Research Article
Effects of Mnemonic Strategy Training on Brain Activity and Cognitive Functioning of Left-Hemisphere Ischemic Stroke Patients
Table 2
MST effects on cognitive and behavioral performance of left-sided stroke patients.
| | Pretraining | Posttraining | FDR-corrected p value | Effect size | | Mean ± SD |
| Neuropsychological measures | | | | | HVLT-R immediate learning | | | 0.296 | | HVLT-R delayed recall | | | 0.003 | | BVMT-R immediate learning | | | 0.534 | | BVMT-R delayed recall | | | 0.382 | | Digit span forward | | | 0.368 | | Digit span backward | | | 0.447 | | TMTA | | | 0.228 | | TMTB | | | 0.572 | | VST-I | | | 0.759 | | VST-II | | | 0.534 | | VST-III | | | 0.176 | | SVF | | | 0.759 | | PVF | | | 0.106 | | MCST | | | 0.534 | | Off-scan measures | | | | | FNRT—total | | | 0.00002 | | FNRT—trained stimuli | | | 0.00002 | | FNRT—untrained stimuli | | | 0.108 | | SSI verbal repetition | | | 0.296 | | SSI visual inspection | | | 0.226 | | SSI autobiographical association | | | 0.773 | | SSI face-name association | | | 0.172 | | Ecological and generalization measures | | | | | SUT delayed recall | | | 0.131 | | SUT delayed recall strategy | | | 0.106 | | SUT recognition | | | 0.032 | | SUT recognition strategy | | | 0.080 | | MMQ contentment | | | 0.296 | | MMQ ability | | | 0.932 | | MMQ strategy | | | 0.845 | | BFNQ—name difficulties | | | 0.053 | | BFNQ—face difficulties | | | 0.534 | | BFNQ—name strategy | | | 0.055 | | BFNQ—face strategy | | | 0.045 | |
|
|
Significant differences ( ) after FDR p value correction. : matched rank biserial correlation; : Cohen’s ; HVLT-R: Revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; BVMT-R: Brief Visuospatial Learning Test; VST: Victoria Stroop Test; TMT: Trail Making Test; MCST: Modified Card Sorting Test; PVF: Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test; SVF: Semantic Verbal Fluency; FNRT: Face-Name Recognition Task; SSII: Spontaneous Strategy Implementation Inquiry; MMQ: Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire; BFNQ: Brief Face-Name Questionnaire; SUT: Strategy Use Task. |