Clinical Study

The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Table 1

Demographic and clinical data and TMS findings of recruited patients.

GenderAge at incl.DiagnosisDis. d.Pharmacotherapy for spasticityMT leftMT rightCMCTMEP ampl.CSP

1M38AMN13Baclofen, tizanidine74%62%22.4 ↑0.8/10%107
2M56AMN368%66%18.4 ↑1.0/11%280
3M41AMN14Clonazepam, baclofen, and Lorenzo’s oil66%78%24.7 ↑0.5/4%122
4F42Unspecified pure8Tizanidine72%69%19.3 ↑0.5/3%119
5M38Unspecified compl.2067% MHG66% MHG33 ↑1.2/60%129
6M29HSP3A2657% AMT53% AMT14.71.4/10%189
7M36HSP78BaclofenNo responseNo response
8F62AMN gene carrier6Baclofen72%65%18 ↑2.4/13%
9M54Unspecified pure17Baclofen57%54%16.80.6/7%111
10M50Unspecified pure854%50%14.31.5/17%229
11M53Unspecified pure8Baclofen50% AMT50% AMT12.80.4/7%121
12M41Unspecified pure1954% AMT40% AMT16.21.1/7%132
13F46AMN gene carrier463%67%23.7 ↑0.7/10%93
14F48AMN gene carrier15Baclofen72%72%18.4 ↑1.0/7%119
15F22Unspecified compl.2168%76%150.9/5%109

F: female; M: male; age at incl.: age at inclusion; duration of sympt.: duration of symptoms (years); MT left: motor threshold of the left abductor hallucis (except subject 5) in % of the maximal stimulator output; MT right: motor threshold of the right abductor hallucis (except subject 5) in % of the maximal stimulator output; CMCT: central motor conduction time in milliseconds; MEP: motor-evoked potential (expressed in millivolts and as the percentage of the amplitude of respective peripheral response); CSP: cortical silent period (in milliseconds); AMN: adrenomyeloneuropathy; HSP: hereditary spastic paraplegia; MHG: medial head of gastrocnemius; compl.: complicated. The unusually high amplitude of MEP in relation to peripheral response in this patient may be explained by atrophy of MHG, which decreased the peripheral response more profoundly than MEP, because MEP amplitude was probably a summation of potentials generated by MHG and adjacent muscles innervated by the peroneal nerve, which were located—due to atrophy—close to the recording electrode. Patient no. 6 dropped out. CSP was not done in patient number 8. As the published normative data for MT were done using circular coil [24], we did not assess MT regarding its normality.