Neural Plasticity

Neural Plasticity / 2020 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8815990 |

Mei Wei, Wei Wang, Yao Liu, Xiang Mao, Tai Sheng Chen, Peng Lin, "Protection of Cochlear Ribbon Synapses and Prevention of Hidden Hearing Loss", Neural Plasticity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8815990, 11 pages, 2020.

Protection of Cochlear Ribbon Synapses and Prevention of Hidden Hearing Loss

Academic Editor: Josef Syka
Received04 Apr 2020
Revised08 Oct 2020
Accepted21 Oct 2020
Published02 Nov 2020


In the auditory system, ribbon synapses are vesicle-associated structures located between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons that are implicated in the modulation of trafficking and fusion of synaptic vesicles at the presynaptic terminals. Synapse loss may result in hearing loss and difficulties with understanding speech in a noisy environment. This phenomenon happens without permanent hearing loss; that is, the cochlear synaptopathy is “hidden.” Recent studies have reported that synapse loss might be critical in the pathogenesis of hidden hearing loss. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the formation, structure, regeneration, and protection of ribbon synapses will assist in the design of potential therapeutic strategies. In this review, we describe and summarize the following aspects of ribbon synapses: (1) functional and structural features, (2) potential mechanisms of damage, (3) therapeutic research on protecting the synapses, and (4) the role of synaptic regeneration in auditory neuropathy and the current options for synapse rehabilitation.

1. Introduction

Hair cells (HCs) in the mammalian cochlea play a vital role in converting mechanical sound waves into neural signals for hearing [13]. Ribbon synapses are the vital structures between inner HCs (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and are the first excitatory afferent synapses in the auditory pathway. Acoustic stimuli of various intensities and frequencies cause corresponding changes in the number, structure, shape, and function of ribbon synapses. These synapses are highly sensitive to noise, ototoxic drugs, inflammation, and aging [49], factors that can lead to changes in the hearing threshold.

In the traditional sense, “hearing loss” (i.e., an increase in threshold) is generally considered to result from damaged HCs [1015]. However, in recent years, clinical and basic studies have shown that an increase in the threshold value does not necessarily accompany hearing loss; after a period of time, the threshold value returns to the normal level [1619]. A special type of sensorineural hearing loss, namely, “hidden hearing loss” (HHL), can be caused by damaged synapses between IHCs and SGNs; no dysfunction in the auditory threshold is observed, yet serious perceptual difficulties are obvious, especially in understanding speech in a noisy environment [20, 21]. HHL reportedly correlates with the loss of a subset of synaptic connections between the IHCs and the auditory nerve (AN) [22, 23]. To better elucidate the effect of synaptic damage on hearing and to provide new perspectives and clues to explain clinically complex hearing problems, in this article, we summarize the mechanisms underlying ribbon synaptic damage, protection, and regeneration.

2. Functional and Structural Features of Ribbon Synapses

Ribbon synapses play an important role in the inner ear system. They are vesicle-associated structures implicated in the modulation of trafficking and fusion of synaptic vesicles at the presynaptic terminals [24]. In the mammalian auditory system, ribbon synapses are essential for phase locking and spatial sound localization [25]. In a vestibular HC, ribbon synapses play a role in triggering the ms-range vestibulo-ocular reflex [26]. In the inner ear system, the shape, size, and number of ribbon synapses vary according to the spatial position and physiological state, even at different developmental stages of the same animal [27]. Ribbon synapses of vestibular HCs have a smaller number of ribbons and a tighter coupling with Ca2+ channels compared with cochlear IHCs [28]. In the IHCs, the ribbon synapse structure differs in the high- and low-frequency regions of the cochlea, leading to variations in the exocytosis of ribbon synapses in terms of spatial distribution and calcium dependence [27].

Recently, the structure and function of ribbon synapses have been further studied. Proteins play essential roles in mammalian IHC synapses, including Ribeye, Otoferlin, Cav1.3 channels, Bassoon, Piccolo, SHANK, PSD95, and F-actin (Figure 1).

Ribeye is the main protein forming the framework of the ribbon, and it can regulate ribbon size. Ribeye is a splice variant of the transcriptional corepressor CtBP2 and has two domains, the unique A domain and the B domain. The B domain includes a nicotinamide (NAD+, NADH, or NAD(H))-binding domain. In developing HCs, NAD+ promotes Ribeye-Ribeye interactions or Ribeye localization to the ribbon, whereas NADH inhibits them. Ribbon size is directly regulated by the levels of NAD+ and NADH [29].

Otoferlin is a unique calcium sensor that is involved in calcium-regulated synaptic transmission as well as vesicle release in vestibular and cochlear synapses [30]. Otoferlin is a multivalent protein capable of simultaneously binding multiple copies of the cytoplasmic loop of Cav1.3 and SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor complex) proteins. Otoferlin acts as a calcium-sensitive scaffolding protein, localizing SNARE proteins proximal to the calcium channel. This close apposition permits fast membrane fusion and exocytosis of neurotransmitters in response to sound [31].

Cav1.3 channels are the main L-type Ca2+ channel subunits involved in synaptic exocytosis in IHCs [32]. The domains II and III of Cav1.3, consisting of amino acids 752–891, are referred to as loop 1.3 [33]. The loop 1.3 region of voltage-gated calcium channels is thought to contribute to exo- and endocytotic processes through interaction with multiple Otoferlin C2 domains [34]. The membrane-associated Cav1.3 channels aggregate in small clusters in close spatial organization to the synaptic ribbons, forming a spatially restricted Ca2+ microdomain in the active zone [35].

Bassoon and Piccolo are two significant scaffolding proteins of the assembled cytomatrix. They play important roles in the maintenance of the presynaptic structure and function and in the assembly of synaptic ribbons. These two proteins can regulate activity-dependent communication between presynaptic boutons and the neuronal nucleus [36], as well as specific protein ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated proteolysis, which potentially induces short-term plasticity at the presynapse. Bassoon and Piccolo also induce molecular rearrangements at the presynapse, with the reprogramming of the expression of neuronal activity-regulated genes. These two large scaffolding proteins use their modular structure to organize supermolecular complexes essential for various aspects of presynaptic function [36].

Receptor clusters can be found in the postsynaptic terminal of the ribbon synapses, including α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors (AMPARs) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NR1, NR2A/B). Mechanosensory HCs release glutamate at the ribbon synapses to excite postsynaptic afferent neurons via AMPA-type ionotropic glutamate receptors (AMPARs) [37]. NMDA receptors are present at the afferent synapses in the cochlea, which can modulate the reaction of AMPAR to glutamate at the type I afferent terminals [38].

The SHANK protein family, including SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3, comprises “master” scaffolding proteins in the postsynaptic site. The proteins interconnect many components of the postsynaptic density with those of the cytoskeletal matrix, including NMDA, AMPA, and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) [39]. AMPA transmission may be affected by the deletion of SHANK genes. SHANK proteins play a pivotal role in synaptic development and function and also in the regulation of excitatory neurotransmission [40].

PSD95, an important regulator of synaptic maturation, is an essential scaffolding protein in synaptogenesis and neurodevelopment. It interacts with, stabilizes, and directs N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) and AMPARs to the postsynaptic membrane [41]. PSD95 is perhaps the best characterized MAGUK protein of the postsynaptic density. It has a PDZ domain that can interact with NMDARs, which potentially affects glutamate transmission and the formation of silent synapses during critical time points of neurodevelopment. The C-terminus of the protein has a guanylate kinase domain, which is linked to members of the SAPAP family of proteins. SAPAP proteins subsequently bind to the SHANK protein family. The protein of PSD95 can serve as an interface between clustered membrane-bound receptors, cell adhesion molecules, and the actin cytoskeleton [42].

In auditory HCs, the pressure produced by sound waves is converted into an electrical nerve signal. Ribbon synapses are essential in neural encoding of microphonic potentials by mechanisms involving Cav1.3 channels and Otoferlin-dependent exocytosis of synaptic vesicles [28, 43]. The F-actin network maintains tight spatial organization of Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels and influences the efficiency of Otoferlin-dependent exocytosis. It controls the flow of synaptic vesicles during exocytosis at the IHC ribbons, thus playing a vital role in the function of normal ribbon synapses [44].

The unique morphological, molecular, and physiological characteristics of ribbon synapses help to maintain high rates of neurotransmitter release, with a high degree of temporal precision. At each synapse, an electron-dense ribbon is located in the presynaptic region. The ribbon is normally surrounded by a halo of synaptic vesicles containing glutamate [45]. The presynaptic membrane is depolarized after external sound stimulation, resulting in the generation of a depolarizing receptor potential of the potassium cation influx. This graded potential triggers Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) at the presynaptic active zones of the ribbon synapse. Calcium in the presynaptic active zones binds to the HC’s Ca2+ sensor and Otoferlin, driving synaptic vesicle fusion and glutamate release [46]. Glutamate released into the synaptic cleft then activates AMPA receptors present on the terminals of the auditory afferent nerve fibers, thereby completing the excitatory transmission of sound signals on the AN.

3. Mechanisms of Ribbon Synapse Damage

Studies have shown that the number of cellular synapses can be influenced by acute noise exposure, ototoxicity, gene mutations, and aging. However, the number of IHCs does not change. An increasing number of detailed studies have been conducted to determine the causes and molecular-level mechanisms of cochlear synaptic lesions.

3.1. Genetic Factors

Recently, genetic studies have examined the molecules required for hearing in zebrafish and mammals. Of the synapse-associated genes, DFNB9 and Cav1.3, in particular, are required for HC neurotransmission. Mutations in these genes have been associated with HHL. Here, we discuss the influence of these mutants on HC synaptic development, maintenance, and function.

3.1.1. DFNB9

The OTOF gene (DFNB9) encodes Otoferlin, a transmembrane protein belonging to the ferlin protein family that is expressed in cochlear IHCs and is needed for synaptic exocytosis at the ribbon synapse [47]. Otoferlin comprises multiple C2 domains (A–F) [48]. A C2 domain contains 100–130 amino acids and can mediate interaction with membranes by binding Ca2+ and negatively charged lipids such as phosphatidylserine (PS) or phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). In a recent study of Otoferlin C2 domains, the binding of Ca2+ was indicated for all C2 domains with the exception of C2A [49, 50] (Figure 2(a)). The C2C and C2F domains of Otoferlin preferentially bind PIP2, and PIP2 may target Otoferlin to the presynapse in a calcium-independent manner [51]. This positioning facilitates fast calcium-dependent exocytosis at the HC synapse [48]. Otoferlin can trigger ultrafast exocytosis and endocytosis and can recruit synaptic vesicles to the active zone [49]. It acts as a scaffolding protein that first targets the presynaptic membrane by interacting with PIP2 and subsequently interacts with the calcium channels and membrane fusion machinery (one or more SNARE isoforms). The linking of the synaptic vesicle, presynaptic calcium channel, and membrane fusion proteins in close spatial proximity was shown to reduce the “reaction pace” and increase the fidelity and precision of exocytosis in response to presynaptic calcium influx [34]. The potential molecular mechanisms of Otoferlin function include (i) targeting the presynaptic membrane via interaction with PIP2, (ii) Ca2+-dependent approximation of vesicular and plasma membranes, and (iii) interaction with proteins such as SNARE and the Cav1.3 channels to mediate Ca2+-triggered fusion [52] (Figure 2(b)).

Pathogenic mutations in OTOF cause nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB9 [53]. To date, more than 160 variants of OTOF have been reported [54], and gene mutations are among the major causes of auditory neuropathy [55, 56]. OTOF mutations disrupt the functioning of the ribbon synapses by impairing multivesicular glutamate release. In Otof−/− mice, the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test demonstrates that the amplitude of the wave is reduced, and the band-shaped synaptic morphology of Otof−/− mice is normal. However, the extracellular transport of synaptic vesicles in the IHCs ceases completely [47] (Figure 2(c)). Otoferlin operates as a Ca2+ sensor at the IHC synapse [57]. In Otoferlin knockout mice, the rapid phase of exocytosis is abolished in IHCs and is not reversed by fast Ca2+ influx or Ca2+ uncaging [58]. Mutation in C2C may induce decreased levels of Otoferlin, and exocytosis may be critically reduced during prolonged stimulation. Mutation in the C2F domain results in a slower replenishment of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at the synaptic pole of IHCs [33]. The C2D domain of Otoferlin interacts with the calcium channel Cav1.3 in a calcium-dependent manner. Mutation in C2D leads to substantially decreased binding to Cav1.3, independent of calcium [35]. For fast and precise acoustic coding, a large, rapidly releasable pool (RRP) of synaptic vesicles is crucial for the release of large amounts of neurotransmitters within a short time. Otoferlin could promote the formation of long tethers that hold and prime the synaptic vesicles in the IHC active zones, which are crucial structures for vesicle replenishment [48].

3.1.2. Cav1.3

Cav1.3 channels belong to the L-type calcium channel family and play a role in neurotransmission at HC synapses. The Cav1.3 channels are ideal calcium channels for mediating rapid and continuous exocytosis, as they can be activated by lower voltages than those needed to activate other Cav1 channels [32]. Cav1.3 channels cluster tightly at synaptic ribbons and are important for tightly coupled calcium influx and vesicle release [59].

Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels have protein isoforms resulting from extensive alternative splicing, especially in the C-terminus region, thereby underlying their different gating properties [60]. The long and short C-terminal isoforms of the Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels differ in the kinetics of their Ca2+ channels and their relative sensitivity to the L-type Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine. The short C-terminal isoforms encode the phasic exocytotic component and have low sensitivity to nifedipine; they control the fast fusion of the RRP. The expression of short fast inactivating isoforms of the Cav1.3 channels decreases in IHCs lacking Otoferlin [61]. The long isoforms of the Cav1.3 Ca2+ channel, with slow inactivation and great sensitivity to nifedipine, regulate the sustained or tonic exocytosis of the RRP. Slow inactivating long Cav1.3 isoforms enable sustained and deeper Ca2+ diffusion in IHCs, which is essential for the recruitment of vesicles located at large distances from the release sites [62]. In IHCs, the mechanisms of transient and sustained exocytosis use the different isoforms of the Cav1.3 channels [61]. The Cav1.3 L-type channels control IHC sensory function. Downregulated expression of Cav1.3 is related to age-related hearing loss. Cav1.3 protects cells in the auditory pathway from oxidative stress, so decreased Cav1.3 expression can lead to hearing loss through the enhancement of calcium-mediated oxidative stress [63]. In Cav1.3 knockout mice, the IHCs remain immature, because they cannot upregulate voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ channels [64]. In zebrafish HCs, the Cav1.3 channels play a role in the regulation of presynaptic size during cell development [65].

3.2. Ototoxicity

Some ototoxic drugs can also damage ribbon synapses. High doses of aminoglycosides, including gentamicin and neomycin, induce auditory threshold shifts for HC toxicity [66] by causing acute swelling of SGN terminal dendrites [67, 68]. In the normal cochlea, ribbon synapses accumulate at the base of IHCs and appear in pairs. After aminoglycoside-induced injury, the ribbon synapses move from the base of the IHCs to the perinucleus, and many dissociations of the synaptic pairs are observed [69]. Low-dose gentamicin may cause ribbon synapse-associated protein synthesis disorder (e.g., Ribeye and Otoferlin), which affects the plasticity and neurotransmitter release pattern of the ribbon synapses [35, 70]. IHC ribbon synapses are the primary targets of aminoglycoside ototoxicity, with resultant hearing loss.

Ouabain is also ototoxic. Injecting ouabain through the cochlea round window membrane in mice can selectively destroy type I SGNs. Disintegrated synaptic pairs appear after ouabain injury, and these dissociated synaptic pairs gather in IHCs near the nucleus, which is similar to the characteristic damage of aminoglycosides [71].

Cisplatin can also cause hearing loss. The mechanisms underlying cisplatin ototoxicity include the induction of calcium ion accumulation in IHCs, which prevents calcium influx. The decreasing calcium current leads to dysfunction of synaptic release and impairs vesicle cycling, thereby resulting in hearing loss [72].

3.3. Noise Exposure

In humans, intense or prolonged exposure to noise can result in profound hearing loss. However, in some cases, noise exposure only leads to an elevated hearing threshold [73]. There are many related studies on noise-induced sensorineural hearing loss [7476], because the pathological mechanism of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is extremely complicated, and the exact mechanism is still unclear.

Researchers have shown that severe noise exposure can lead to damage or loss of HCs or HC synapses or permanent threshold shifts [7779]. Moderate noise exposure results in an elevation in the hearing threshold, but the threshold eventually returns to normal [80]. However, despite the clinical hearing threshold returning to normal, the numbers of ribbon synapses and afferent fiber terminals are significantly reduced [81, 82]. Moderate noise exposure can significantly reduce the number of ribbon synapses per IHC in the apical region, but this number then fully recovers. Tight control of Ca2+ influx through VGCCs is important for the precise transmission of auditory signals in IHC ribbon synapses. After moderate exposure to noise, the Ca2+ current amplitude decreases but gradually recovers [83]. In IHCs, a temporary decrease in Ca2+ current is consistent with a decrease in the number of ribbon synapses. IHCs prolong the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles and are related to the rapid replenishment of these synaptic vesicles [84]. After noise exposure, the fast and efficient recycling of synaptic vesicles decreases, which may contribute to the loss and recovery of ribbon synapses; such a decrease could also be caused by a decrease in the efficiency of Ca2+ in triggering synaptic vesicle release. Thus, exploring changes in synaptic function after noise exposure may be a new direction for the study of implicit hearing loss [85].

3.4. Aging

Presbycusis, also known as age-related hearing loss, results from age-related decline in the function of the inner ear [86]. Ribbon synapses between IHCs and SGNs are formed as the first afferent neuronal connection in the auditory nervous system. In the early stage of presbycusis, the cochlear ribbon synapse is the primary insult site [87]. A high rate of neurotransmitter release is a characteristic of ribbon synapses. An effective neurotransmitter transport system in IHCs for the maintenance of synaptic vesicle recycling and tonic exocytosis is largely dependent on ATP produced by mitochondria [88]. Increased oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and decreased mitochondrial ATP production are detected in the cochlea of mice exposed to D-gal-induced aging. Thus, age-related ribbon synapse insult may result from mitochondrial oxidative damage and subsequent dysfunction [87].

4. Synapse Protection

Certain proteins or factors protect ribbon synapses, so targeting these to protect the ribbon synapses would be an effective measure for preventing HHL.

When exposed to noise, glutamate accumulation in the synaptic cleft leads to overactivation of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluR) and subsequent excitotoxic damage, which in turn damages the postsynaptic terminal. Thus, regulating glutamate excitotoxicity and blocking iGluR might prevent noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy [89]. The application of the iGluR agonists AMPA, kainic acid (KA), and NMDA to the mammalian inner ear or HC explants can mimic glutamate excitotoxicity associated with noise exposure [90]. In mammals, the application of AMPA or KA leads to overactivation of the iGluR receptors, which affects neurotransmission at postsynaptic afferent terminals [89]. The application of NMDA glutamate receptor blockers, such as kynurenate and DNQX, can reduce the dendritic SGNs. For instance, MK-801, an antagonist for the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors, is effective against NIHL; however, whether this protection is attributable to the preservation of the synapses between IHCs and SGNs or other mechanisms has yet to be determined [91]. Therefore, detailed pharmacodynamics studies with current immunohistological methods are needed to determine whether modulation of the glutamate excitotoxicity pathways could prevent cochlear synaptopathy.

The distribution of both VGCC blockers (L- and N-type) and calcium channels in IHCs is reportedly consistent. Thus, VGCC blockers could be used to protect the cochlear IHCs from noise damage. However, whether the application of a blocker can prevent noise-induced synaptic damage has yet to be demonstrated. Another protective approach is to regulate calcium signaling pathways. Studies have shown that blockers for T-type VGCCs can protect against NIHL, and L-type VGCC blockers also can be used to prevent NIHL. However, these studies did not focus on cochlear synaptopathy [92, 93].

Recently, many other factors and proteins have been shown to protect synapses. The WW domain-binding protein 2 encoded by WBP2 acts as a transcription coactivator for the estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor [94]. Both estrogen and progesterone can protect against stroke and glutamate toxicity [95]. In the auditory system, estrogen controls central and peripheral auditory processing [96]. According to research, Wbp2 may be a potential target to prevent or even reverse progressive hearing loss via regulating the estrogen signaling pathway, which has vital involvement in synaptic damage [97].

Fibroblast growth factor-22 (FGF22) plays a novel role in protecting the IHC ribbon synapses of the cochlea from gentamycin ototoxicity. In mice, intraperitoneal injection of gentamycin causes a decrease in the ribbon synapse number and FGF22 expression as well as an increase in MEF2D expression. FGF22 infusion reversed the loss of ribbon synapse and upregulation of MEF2D caused by gentamycin and restored hearing [98]. MEF2D, a member of the myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) family, which is reported to be highly expressed in the brain and is regulated by calcium signaling pathways, suppresses the number of excitatory synapses [99]. Activating FGF22 might provide the conceptual basis for the therapeutic strategies.

Nicotinamide riboside (NR) is a potent stimulator of NAD+ production and can increase NAD+ levels in many types of animal tissues. NAD+ is a fundamental molecule in all mammalian cells and plays an essential role in numerous cellular processes, such as metabolism and cell signaling pathways. The use of NR could promote the recovery of synapses, contributing to the protection of hearing [100].

The macrophage migration inhibitory factor is expressed in the inner ear of mammals or chickens and plays a role in neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival at the stage of initial neurite outgrowth; it is essential for the maintenance of normal hearing [101]. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor kenpaullone may be effective in preventing recessive hearing loss caused by low-decibel noise, although the exact mechanism remains unclear [102, 103].

The network of interactions between these cytokines needs further study, and the molecular mechanisms that regulate inner ear development and innervation also need to be further elucidated.

5. Synapse Regeneration

Cochlear ribbon synapses have only limited spontaneous regenerative capacity [104, 105]. Recent studies have shown that many factors and signaling pathways may play a role in promoting synaptic reconstruction and regeneration, which gives new insight into the reversal of hearing loss.

Neurotrophins are critical factors in the mammalian cochlea. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophic factor-4/5 (NT-4/5), neurotrophic factor-3 (NT-3), and nerve growth factor play a role in ribbon synapse formation during development, in plasticity, and in the maintenance of synaptic stability [106108]. NT-3 and BDNF are the two major types [109]. BDNF levels in immature cochleae are higher than those in mature cochleae, in which BDNF expression eventually declines to undetectable levels. Analyses of neurotrophin levels in adult cochleae have detected only NT-3 and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor [110112]. Knockout of BDNF and NT-3 in the inner ear of newborn mammals caused ribbon synaptic damage in the vestibule and inner ear, respectively, resulting in vestibular dysfunction and hearing loss [113]. Application of BDNF and NT-3 promoted reconstruction of SGNs in cultured cochleae, and they expressed markers of postsynaptic ototoxic drug damage [114]. Several studies have reported that synapse regeneration can be promoted by NT-3. Synapse density increased, and the ABR threshold decreased in mice overexpressing NT-3 [112]. NT-3 has a protective ability, as demonstrated in tests of the ABR amplitude and synapse count by round window injection. After noise trauma, applying NT-3 through the round window may be an ideal solution for protecting against synaptic damage [115, 116].

Photobiomodulation (PBM) enhances neural growth and connections in the peripheral nervous system. The use of low-intensity lasers for PBM has been studied in various fields for therapeutic purposes, and some studies indicate that PBM may have therapeutic effects on hearing [109]. PBM promotes and activates cell growth by increasing the mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production after oxidative stress, which play essential roles in NIHL [110]. A study found that PBM rescued cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure by increasing neurotrophins and intracellular components, including ATP, matrix metalloproteinases, and Ca2+ [111].

Another important synaptotrophic factor is glutamate. Glutamatergic transmission can be mediated by Vglut3 [113]. In Vglut3-deleted mice, the number of newly generated synaptic contacts at the dendrites of SGNs was significantly decreased when compared with the number in normal controls, which indicated that the proper release of glutamate transmitter plays an important role in the regeneration of synaptic contacts in vitro [113].

Clarin-1 (CLRN1) is essential for hair bundle morphogenesis in auditory HCs. Usher syndrome type IIIA is caused by mutations in CLRN1 encoding clarin-1 [117]. The protein is crucial for the structural organization and function of the presynaptic Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels at the IHC ribbon synapses, as well as for the distribution of postsynaptic AMPA receptors. Loss of CLRN1 leads to disorganization of the synaptic F-actin network in IHCs, which is likely to account for lower Ca2+ efficiency in exocytosis in IHCs. Virus-mediated CLRN1 could preserve ribbon synapses and hair bundle structures in CLRN1 mutant HCs, indicating that gene therapy targeting mutant HCs could reverse synaptic defects and restore hearing. Gene therapy approaches could be used to effectively treat genetic inner ear disorders.

6. Conclusion

Many researchers have increased awareness of synaptopathy, which may contribute to HHL. Studying synapse formation is especially important for the diagnosis and treatment of HHL. Research progress in the topic of ribbon synapses, as well as analysis of the biological mechanisms in ribbon synapses, is rapid. The mechanisms underlying ribbon synapse damage and protection have been explored in the past decades; however, more studies to identify the survival and regenerative mechanisms of ribbon synapses are needed. Furthermore, implementing large-scale screening of the genes and chemicals involved in ribbon synapses is important in identifying candidate mechanisms that can be manipulated with pharmaceutical, genetic, or other interventions for broader discoveries about ribbon synapses. As biochemical, molecular, and imaging approaches become more advanced, insights into the etiology and mechanisms responsible for the survival, damage, and regeneration of ribbon synapses will be obtained, which may in turn lead to the discovery of novel effective therapeutic targets for HHL.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


This study was supported by the Key Clinical Discipline of Tianjin, National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971698), and Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (19JCYBJC27200).


  1. Y. Liu, J. Qi, X. Chen et al., “Critical role of spectrin in hearing development and deafness,” Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 4, article eaav7803, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Qi, Y. Liu, C. Chu et al., “A cytoskeleton structure revealed by super-resolution fluorescence imaging in inner ear hair cells,” Cell Discovery, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Qi, L. Zhang, F. Tan et al., “Espin distribution as revealed by super-resolution microscopy of stereocilia,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  4. Z. H. He, S. Y. Zou, M. Li et al., “The nuclear transcription factor FoxG1 affects the sensitivity of mimetic aging hair cells to inflammation by regulating autophagy pathways,” Redox Biology, vol. 28, p. 101364, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Gao, C. Cheng, M. Wang et al., “Blebbistatin inhibits neomycin-induced apoptosis in hair cell-like HEI-OC-1 cells and in cochlear hair cells,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 590, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Zhang, W. Li, Z. He et al., “Pre-treatment with fasudil prevents neomycin-induced hair cell damage by reducing the accumulation of reactive oxygen species,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 264, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Liu, X. Xu, Z. Fan et al., “Wnt signaling activates TP53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator and protects against cisplatin-induced spiral ganglion neuron damage in the mouse cochlea,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1389–1410, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Qi et al. et al., “Wnt activation protects against neomycin-induced hair cell damage in the mouse cochlea,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 7, no. 3, article e2136, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Li, Y. Song, Z. He et al., “Meclofenamic acid reduces reactive oxygen species accumulation and apoptosis, inhibits excessive autophagy, and protects hair cell-like HEI-OC1 cells from cisplatin-induced damage,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 139, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Wang, J. Li, X. Yao et al., “Loss of CIB2 causes profound hearing loss and abolishes mechanoelectrical transduction in mice,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 401, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Z. He, L. Guo, Y. Shu et al., “Autophagy protects auditory hair cells against neomycin-induced damage,” Autophagy, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1884–1904, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. He, Q. Fang, H. Li et al., “The role of FOXG1 in the postnatal development and survival of mouse cochlear hair cells,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 144, pp. 43–57, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Li, D. You, W. Li et al., “Novel compounds protect auditory hair cells against gentamycin-induced apoptosis by maintaining the expression level of H3K4me2,” Drug Delivery, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1033–1043, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Dong et al., “Knockdown of Foxg1 in supporting cells increases the trans-differentiation of supporting cells into hair cells in the neonatal mouse cochlea,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1401–1419, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. X. Yu, W. Liu, Z. Fan et al., “c-Myb knockdown increases the neomycin-induced damage to hair-cell-like HEI-OC1 cells in vitro,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Henderson, E. C. Bielefeld, K. C. Harris, and B. H. Hu, “The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Hoben, G. Easow, S. Pevzner, and M. A. Parker, “Outer hair cell and auditory nerve function in speech recognition in quiet and in background noise,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 157, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. H. A. M. Mulders, I. L. Chin, and D. Robertson, “Persistent hair cell malfunction contributes to hidden hearing loss,” Hearing Research, vol. 361, pp. 45–51, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. C. Kohrman, G. Wan, L. Cassinotti, and G. Corfas, “Hidden hearing loss: a disorder with multiple etiologies and mechanisms,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. G. Kujawa and M. C. Liberman, “Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 45, pp. 14077–14085, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. M. H. Bakay, L. A. Anderson, J. A. Garcia-Lazaro, D. McAlpine, and R. Schaette, “Hidden hearing loss selectively impairs neural adaptation to loud sound environments,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4298, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Wan and G. Corfas, “Transient auditory nerve demyelination as a new mechanism for hidden hearing loss,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. E. Choi, J. M. Seok, J. Ahn et al., “Hidden hearing loss in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 10335, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Snellman, B. Mehta, N. Babai et al., “Acute destruction of the synaptic ribbon reveals a role for the ribbon in vesicle priming,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1135–1141, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. R. Palmer and I. J. Russell, “Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells,” Hearing Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Huterer and K. E. Cullen, “Vestibuloocular reflex dynamics during high-frequency and high-acceleration rotations of the head on body in rhesus monkey,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Khimich, R. Nouvian, R. Pujol et al., “Hair cell synaptic ribbons are essential for synchronous auditory signalling,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7035, pp. 889–894, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. F. Y. Vincent, Y. Bouleau, S. Safieddine, C. Petit, and D. Dulon, “Exocytotic machineries of vestibular type I and cochlear ribbon synapses display similar intrinsic otoferlin-dependent Ca2+ sensitivity but a different coupling to Ca2+ channels,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 33, pp. 10853–10869, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. C. Wong, Q. Zhang, A. J. Beirl, R. S. Petralia, Y. X. Wang, and K. Kindt, “Synaptic mitochondria regulate hair-cell synapse size and function,” eLife, vol. 8, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Dulon, S. Safieddine, S. M. Jones, and C. Petit, “Otoferlin is critical for a highly sensitive and linear calcium-dependent exocytosis at vestibular hair cell ribbon synapses,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 34, pp. 10474–10487, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Jung, T. Maritzen, C. Wichmann et al., “Disruption of adaptor protein 2μ (AP-2μ) in cochlear hair cells impairs vesicle reloading of synaptic release sites and hearing,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 2686–2702, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Brandt, J. Striessnig, and T. Moser, “CaV1.3 channels are essential for development and presynaptic activity of cochlear inner hair cells,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 10832–10840, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. A. Ramakrishnan, M. J. Drescher, and D. G. Drescher, “Direct interaction of otoferlin with syntaxin 1A, SNAP-25, and the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel Cav1.3,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 3, pp. 1364–1372, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Hams, M. Padmanarayana, W. Qiu, and C. P. Johnson, “Otoferlin is a multivalent calcium-sensitive scaffold linking SNAREs and calcium channels,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 30, pp. 8023–8028, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. B. Wong, M. A. Rutherford, M. Gabrielaitis et al., “Developmental refinement of hair cell synapses tightens the coupling of Ca2+ influx to exocytosis,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 33, pp. 247–264, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. D. Gundelfinger, C. Reissner, and C. C. Garner, “Role of bassoon and piccolo in assembly and molecular organization of the active zone,” Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 19, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Glowatzki and P. A. Fuchs, “Transmitter release at the hair cell ribbon synapse,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Z. Chen, M. Peppi, S. G. Kujawa, and W. F. Sewell, “Regulated expression of surface AMPA receptors reduces excitotoxicity in auditory neurons,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 1152–1159, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. M. Boeckers, “The postsynaptic density,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 326, no. 2, pp. 409–422, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Monteiro and G. Feng, “SHANK proteins: roles at the synapse and in autism spectrum disorder,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 147–157, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. A. Coley and W. J. Gao, “PSD95: a synaptic protein implicated in schizophrenia or autism?” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 82, pp. 187–194, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. Sala, C. Vicidomini, I. Bigi, A. Mossa, and C. Verpelli, “Shank synaptic scaffold proteins: keys to understanding the pathogenesis of autism and other synaptic disorders,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 849–858, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Brandt, D. Khimich, and T. Moser, “Few CaV1.3 channels regulate the exocytosis of a synaptic vesicle at the hair cell ribbon synapse,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 50, pp. 11577–11585, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. F. Vincent, Y. Bouleau, C. Petit, and D. Dulon, “A synaptic F-actin network controls otoferlin-dependent exocytosis in auditory inner hair cells,” eLife, vol. 4, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. A. Fuchs, E. Glowatzki, and T. Moser, “The afferent synapse of cochlear hair cells,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 452–458, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. A. Fuchs, “Time and intensity coding at the hair cell's ribbon synapse,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 566, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. N. Michalski, J. D. Goutman, S. M. Auclair et al., “Otoferlin acts as a Ca2+ sensor for vesicle fusion and vesicle pool replenishment at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses,” Elife, vol. 6, no. 6, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Padmanarayana, N. Hams, L. C. Speight, E. J. Petersson, R. A. Mehl, and C. P. Johnson, “Characterization of the lipid binding properties of otoferlin reveals specific interactions between PI(4,5)P2 and the C2C and C2F domains,” Biochemistry, vol. 53, no. 30, pp. 5023–5033, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. P. Johnson and E. R. Chapman, “Otoferlin is a calcium sensor that directly regulates SNARE-mediated membrane fusion,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 187–197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. V. Bulankina and S. Thoms, “Functions of vertebrate ferlins,” Cell, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 534, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Pangršič, L. Lasarow, K. Reuter et al., “Hearing requires otoferlin-dependent efficient replenishment of synaptic vesicles in hair cells,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 869–876, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Pangršič, E. Reisinger, and T. Moser, “Otoferlin: a multi-C2 domain protein essential for hearing,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 671–680, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S.’i. Yasunaga, M.’h. Grati, M. Cohen-Salmon et al., “A mutation in OTOF, encoding otoferlin, a FER-1-like protein, causes DFNB9, a nonsyndromic form of deafness,” Nature Genetics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 363–369, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. A. H. Kuchay, Y. R. Mir, X. Zeng, A. Hassan, K. Namba, and M. Tekin, “Novel OTOF pathogenic variant segregating with non-syndromic hearing loss in a consanguineous family from tribal Rajouri in Jammu and Kashmir,” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 130, p. 109831, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. Rodríguez-Ballesteros, R. Reynoso, M. Olarte et al., “A multicenter study on the prevalence and spectrum of mutations in the otoferlin gene (OTOF) in subjects with nonsyndromic hearing impairment and auditory neuropathy,” Human Mutation, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 823–831, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Romanos, L. Kimura, M. L. Fávero et al., “Novel OTOF mutations in Brazilian patients with auditory neuropathy,” Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 382–385, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. L. Johnson, S. Safieddine, M. Mustapha, and W. Marcotti, “Hair cell afferent synapses: function and dysfunction,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 12, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. Santarelli, P. Scimemi, E. Dal Monte, E. Genovese, and E. Arslan, “Auditory neuropathy in systemic sclerosis: a speech perception and evoked potential study before and after cochlear implantation,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 263, no. 9, pp. 809–815, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. F. Qi, R. Zhang, J. Chen et al., “Down-regulation of Cav1.3 in auditory pathway promotes age-related hearing loss by enhancing calcium-mediated oxidative stress in male mice,” Aging, vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 6490–6502, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. F. Y. Vincent, Y. Bouleau, G. Charpentier et al., “Different CaV1.3 channel isoforms control distinct components of the synaptic vesicle cycle in auditory inner hair cells,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2960–2975, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. X. Liu, P. S. Yang, W. Yang, and D. T. Yue, “Enzyme-inhibitor-like tuning of Ca(2+) channel connectivity with calmodulin,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7283, pp. 968–972, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Z. He, S. Sun, M. Waqas et al., “Reduced TRMU expression increases the sensitivity of hair-cell-like HEI-OC-1 cells to neomycin damage in vitro,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Eckrich, D. Hecker, K. Sorg et al., “Cochlea-specific deletion of Cav1.3 calcium channels arrests inner hair cell differentiation and unravels pitfalls of conditional mouse models,” Front Cell Neurosci, vol. 13, p. 225, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Sheets, K. S. Kindt, and T. Nicolson, “Presynaptic CaV1.3 channels regulate synaptic ribbon size and are required for synaptic maintenance in sensory hair cells,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 48, pp. 17273–17286, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. H. Huang, D. Yu, and T. W. Soong, “C-terminal alternative splicing of CaV1.3 channels distinctively modulates their dihydropyridine sensitivity,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 643–653, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. S. Sun, M. Sun, Y. Zhang et al., “In vivo overexpression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein protects against neomycin-induced hair cell loss in the apical turn of the cochlea during the ototoxic-sensitive period,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 248, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Duan, K. Agerman, P. Ernfors, and B. Canlon, “Complementary roles of neurotrophin 3 and a N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in the protection of noise and aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 13, pp. 7597–7602, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. Schacht, A. E. Talaska, and L. P. Rybak, “Cisplatin and aminoglycoside antibiotics: hearing loss and its prevention,” Anat Rec (Hoboken), vol. 295, no. 11, pp. 1837–1850, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Hong, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang et al. et al., “N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptors involvement in the gentamicin-induced hearing loss and pathological changes of ribbon synapse in the mouse cochlear inner hair cells,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2018, Article ID 3989201, 16 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. K. Liu, D. Chen, W. Guo et al., “Spontaneous and partial repair of ribbon synapse in cochlear inner hair cells after ototoxic withdrawal,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1680–1689, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Y. Yuan, F. Shi, Y. Yin et al., “Ouabain-induced cochlear nerve degeneration: synaptic loss and plasticity in a mouse model of auditory neuropathy,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Lu, W. Wang, H. Liu, H. Liu, and H. Wu, “Cisplatin induces calcium ion accumulation and hearing loss by causing functional alterations in calcium channels and exocytosis,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 11, no. 11, article 31814894, pp. 6877–6889, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  73. D. L. Johnson, C. W. Nixon, and M. R. Stephenson, “Long-duration exposure to intermittent noises,” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, vol. 47, pp. 987–990, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  74. Q. Song, P. Shen, X. Li et al., “Coding deficits in hidden hearing loss induced by noise: the nature and impacts,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 25200, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Shi, Y. Chang, X. Li, S. J. Aiken, L. Liu, and J. Wang, “Coding deficits in noise-induced hidden hearing loss may stem from incomplete repair of ribbon synapses in the cochlea,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 231, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. L. Shi, L. Liu, T. He et al., “Ribbon synapse plasticity in the cochleae of guinea pigs after noise-induced silent damage,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 12, article e81566, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. C. Liberman and S. G. Kujawa, “Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: manifestations and mechanisms,” Hearing Research, vol. 349, pp. 138–147, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. L. Shi, K. Liu, H. Wang et al., “Noise induced reversible changes of cochlear ribbon synapses contribute to temporary hearing loss in mice,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 135, no. 11, pp. 1093–1102, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. E. Lobarinas, C. Spankovich, and C. G. Le Prell, “Evidence of "hidden hearing loss" following noise exposures that produce robust TTS and ABR wave-I amplitude reductions,” Hearing Research, vol. 349, pp. 155–163, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. F. Ryan, S. G. Kujawa, T. Hammill, C. Le Prell, and J. Kil, “Temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shifts: a review of basic and clinical observations,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. e271–e275, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. H. M. Bharadwaj, S. Verhulst, L. Shaheen, M. C. Liberman, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, “Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound,” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 26, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. G. C. Stamper and T. A. Johnson, “Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 172–184, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. V. Zampini, S. L. Johnson, C. Franz et al., “Burst activity and ultrafast activation kinetics of CaV1.3 Ca2+ channels support presynaptic activity in adult gerbil hair cell ribbon synapses,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 591, no. 16, pp. 3811–3820, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. G. Matthews and P. Fuchs, “The diverse roles of ribbon synapses in sensory neurotransmission,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 812–822, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. H. Liu, J. Lu, Z. Wang et al., “Functional alteration of ribbon synapses in inner hair cells by noise exposure causing hidden hearing loss,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 707, p. 134268, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. Howarth and G. R. Shone, “Ageing and the auditory system,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 82, no. 965, pp. 166–171, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Z.-D. Du, S.-G. Han, T.-F. Qu et al., “Age-related insult of cochlear ribbon synapses: an early-onset contributor to D-galactose-induced aging in mice,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 133, article 104649, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. P. Verstreken, C. V. Ly, K. J. T. Venken, T. W. Koh, Y. Zhou, and H. J. Bellen, “Synaptic mitochondria are critical for mobilization of reserve pool vesicles at Drosophila neuromuscular junctions,” Neuron, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 365–378, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. Y. Sebe, S. Cho, L. Sheets, M. A. Rutherford, H. von Gersdorff, and D. W. Raible, “Ca2+-permeable AMPARs mediate glutamatergic transmission and excitotoxic damage at the hair cell ribbon synapse,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 25, pp. 6162–6175, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. L. Sheets, “Excessive activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors induces apoptotic hair-cell death independent of afferent and efferent innervation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 41102, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. Y. Ohinata, J. M. Miller, and J. Schacht, “Protection from noise-induced lipid peroxidation and hair cell loss in the cochlea,” Brain Research, vol. 966, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. T. M. Helfer, N. N. Jordan, R. B. Lee, P. Pietrusiak, K. Cave, and K. Schairer, “Noise-induced hearing injury and comorbidities among postdeployment U.S. Army soldiers: April 2003-June 2009,” American Journal of Audiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. U. R. Heinrich, J. Maurer, and W. Mann, “Ultrastructural evidence for protection of the outer hair cells of the inner ear during intense noise exposure by application of the organic calcium channel blocker diltiazem,” ORL: Journal for Otorhinolaryngology and Its Related Specialties, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 321–327, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. S. K. Lim, M. Orhant-Prioux, W. Toy, K. Y. Tan, and Y. P. Lim, “Tyrosine phosphorylation of transcriptional coactivator WW-domain binding protein 2 regulates estrogen receptor α function in breast cancer via the Wnt pathway,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3004–3018, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. B. Liu, N. Zhang, Y. Y. Guo et al., “G-protein-coupled receptor 30 mediates rapid neuroprotective effects of estrogen via depression of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 14, pp. 4887–4900, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Hultcrantz, R. Simonoska, and A. E. Stenberg, “Estrogen and hearing: a summary of recent investigations,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. A. Buniello, N. J. Ingham, M. A. Lewis et al., “Wbp2 is required for normal glutamatergic synapses in the cochlea and is crucial for hearing,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 191–207, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Li, L. Hang, and Y. Ma, “FGF22 protects hearing function from gentamycin ototoxicity by maintaining ribbon synapse number,” Hearing Research, vol. 332, pp. 39–45, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. Terauchi, E. M. Johnson-Venkatesh, A. B. Toth, D. Javed, M. A. Sutton, and H. Umemori, “Distinct FGFs promote differentiation of excitatory and inhibitory synapses,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7299, pp. 783–787, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. S. Han, Z. Du, K. Liu, and S. Gong, “Nicotinamide riboside protects noise-induced hearing loss by recovering the hair cell ribbon synapses,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 725, p. 134910, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. L. M. Bank, L. M. Bianchi, F. Ebisu et al., “Macrophage migration inhibitory factor acts as a neurotrophin in the developing inner ear,” Development, vol. 139, no. 24, pp. 4666–4674, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. T. Teitz, J. Fang, A. N. Goktug et al., “CDK2 inhibitors as candidate therapeutics for cisplatin- and noise-induced hearing loss,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 215, no. 4, pp. 1187–1203, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. K. Hill, H. Yuan, X. Wang, and S. H. Sha, “Noise-induced loss of hair cells and cochlear synaptopathy are mediated by the activation of AMPK,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 28, pp. 7497–7510, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S. F. Maison, H. Usubuchi, and M. C. Liberman, “Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 5542–5552, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. M. Matsumoto, T. Nakagawa, K. Kojima, T. Sakamoto, F. Fujiyama, and J. Ito, “Potential of embryonic stem cell-derived neurons for synapse formation with auditory hair cells,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 14, pp. 3075–3085, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. L. T. Alto, L. A. Havton, J. M. Conner, E. R. Hollis II, A. Blesch, and M. H. Tuszynski, “Chemotropic guidance facilitates axonal regeneration and synapse formation after spinal cord injury,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1106–1113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. L. X. Deng, P. Deng, Y. Ruan et al., “A novel growth-promoting pathway formed by GDNF-overexpressing Schwann cells promotes propriospinal axonal regeneration, synapse formation, and partial recovery of function after spinal cord injury,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 5655–5667, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. H. Park and M. M. Poo, “Neurotrophin regulation of neural circuit development and function,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. K. C. M. Campbell, S. M. Martin, R. P. Meech, T. L. Hargrove, S. J. Verhulst, and D. J. Fox, “D-methionine (D-met) significantly reduces kanamycin-induced ototoxicity in pigmented guinea pigs,” International Journal of Audiology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 273–278, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. A. Tamura, T. Matsunobu, K. Mizutari et al., “Low-level laser therapy for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in rats,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 595, pp. 81–86, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. H. Lee, M. Y. Lee, P. S. Chung, and J. Y. Jung, “Photobiomodulation using low-level 808 nm diode laser rescues cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure in rat,” Journal of Biophotonics, vol. 12, no. 11, article e201900145, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. G. Wan, M. E. Gómez-Casati, A. R. Gigliello, M. C. Liberman, and G. Corfas, “Neurotrophin-3 regulates ribbon synapse density in the cochlea and induces synapse regeneration after acoustic trauma,” eLife, vol. 3, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. K. X. Kim, S. Payne, A. Yang-Hood et al., “Vesicular glutamatergic transmission in noise-induced loss and repair of cochlear ribbon synapses,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 39, no. 23, pp. 4434–4447, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. M. Tong, A. Brugeaud, and A. S. B. Edge, “Regenerated synapses between postnatal hair cells and auditory neurons,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 321–329, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Yagi, S. Kanzaki, K. Kawamoto et al., “Spiral ganglion neurons are protected from degeneration by GDNF gene therapy,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 315–325, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. J. Suzuki, G. Corfas, and M. C. Liberman, “Round-window delivery of neurotrophin 3 regenerates cochlear synapses after acoustic overexposure,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 24907, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. R. Geng, A. Omar, S. R. Gopal et al., “Modeling and preventing progressive hearing loss in Usher syndrome III,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 13480, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mei Wei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.