Neural Plasticity

Neural Plasticity / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Cortical Circuitry and Synaptic Dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8826087 |

Lília Jorge, Nádia Canário, Ricardo Martins, Beatriz Santiago, Isabel Santana, Hugo Quental, Francisco Ambrósio, Rui Bernardes, Miguel Castelo-Branco, "The Retinal Inner Plexiform Synaptic Layer Mirrors Grey Matter Thickness of Primary Visual Cortex with Increased Amyloid β Load in Early Alzheimer’s Disease", Neural Plasticity, vol. 2020, Article ID 8826087, 11 pages, 2020.

The Retinal Inner Plexiform Synaptic Layer Mirrors Grey Matter Thickness of Primary Visual Cortex with Increased Amyloid β Load in Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Academic Editor: Alberto Benussi
Received24 Apr 2020
Revised19 Aug 2020
Accepted24 Aug 2020
Published21 Sep 2020


The retina may serve as putative window into neuropathology of synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we investigated synapse-rich layers versus layers composed by nuclei/cell bodies in an early stage of AD. In addition, we examined the associations between retinal changes and molecular and structural markers of cortical damage. We recruited 20 AD patients and 17 healthy controls (HC). Combining optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance (MR), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we measured retinal and primary visual cortex (V1) thicknesses, along with V1 amyloid β (Aβ) retention ([11C]-PiB PET tracer) and neuroinflammation ([11C]-PK11195 PET tracer). We found that V1 showed increased amyloid-binding potential, in the absence of neuroinflammation. Although thickness changes were still absent, we identified a positive association between the synapse-rich inner plexiform layer (IPL) and V1 in AD. This retinocortical interplay might reflect changes in synaptic function resulting from Aβ deposition, contributing to early visual loss.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by the presence of abnormal extracellular Aβ toxic deposits causing synaptic dysfunction, putative neuroinflammation due to microglia activation, and neuronal loss [16], which typically lead to progressive brain atrophy.

The impact of this pathology in the retina as well as other parts of the visual system in AD remains to be understood [7]. In fact, along with the numerous cognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations, visual complains have often been reported in this condition [712] which include loss of contrast and color sensitivity [1317], visual field loss [18, 19] and deficits in the perception of shape from motion [2023].

Such visual impairments have been previously attributed to visual cortical damage, including V1 and visual associative areas [2427]. However, more recently, it has been suggested that neural populations in the retina are also affected by similar pathophysiological mechanisms [2830], even in the absence of visual cortical atrophy [12, 31].

As a part of the central nervous system (CNS), the retina shares multiple features with the brain, in terms of embryological development, anatomy, and function [3235]. These similarities along with the visual changes observed in patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases have justified the proposal that the retina may serve as a mirror to assess brain changes [10, 3638]. In fact, the pathological hallmarks of AD, i.e., neuronal loss, Aβ plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles from the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein (pTau), have also been found in the retina [28, 3943].

Nevertheless, despite all similarities between brain and retina, important biological differences also exist, which concerns the discovery of early disease biomarkers; some features of the retina are particularly prone to such investigation, in particular, the presence of synapse-rich layers. In the retina, neuron cell bodies are organized in specific layers, while the plexiform layers are exclusively dedicated to make the synaptic connection between the different kinds of neurons (for a review, see Hoon et al. [44]), and thus, synapse-rich and nuclei/cell body layers can be easily and independently assessed. For example, the GCL (ganglion cell layer) comprises ganglion cell bodies and displaced amacrine cells [45], while the IPL is densely packed with synapses connecting retinal ganglion cells, amacrine cells, and bipolar cells [44]. This allows testing the dominance of synaptic mechanism vs. cell loss and hence might let to detect subtle initial changes in dendritic integrity given the tenet that the loss of synapses may precede cell loss [46], being more prone to occur in patients with early AD.

In fact, evidence about neurotransmitter changes, structural alterations, and other biochemical markers favours the hypothesis that AD represents, at least in the early stages, a synaptopathy [47, 48]. Considerable evidence suggests that before massive neuronal cell death occurs, there is synaptic dysfunction originated by oligomeric assemblies of the Aβ protein in the hippocampus, one of the first brain structures affected by the pathological mechanisms of the disease [46]. Remarkably, this early loss of synaptic integrity was already demonstrated in the retina of an AD mouse model [49], as well as in ocular neurodegenerative diseases [50]. Therefore, retina might represent an excellent target to detect early neuropathological mechanisms in a faster, direct, and cost-effective way, using in vivo eye imaging techniques, than methods to assess the same mechanisms in the brain.

Existing work addressing structural changes in AD, using OCT, has focused primarily on both RNFL (retinal fiber layer) and GCL, and the controversy remains [8, 31, 5157], whereby differences could appear only in the late stages of the disease [58].

In the present study, we aimed to take advantage of the existence of synaptic versus cell body-rich layers in the retina to investigate whether AD affects differently such layers, as compared to healthy controls, in relation to integrity of V1—the visual area that primarily receives inputs from the retina. To that end, we measured in V1 Aβ levels through [11C]-Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), neuroinflammation using [11C]-PK11195 radiotracer, and neuronal loss by means of cortical thickness analysis. Regarding the retina, we studied the structural integrity of 4 layers, 2 composed by synapses—IPL and OPL (outer plexiform layer)—and 2 composed by cell bodies—GCL (ganglion cell layer) and INL (inner nuclear layer), the layers of the inner retina closer to the brain.

Taking into account the substantial evidence suggesting that synaptic loss is one of the earliest pathological changes in AD, we hypothesize that synapse-rich layers would better reflect cortical status, considering the early stage of our AD sample.

To the best of our knowledge, the present work is the first to investigate an explicit disease-related morphometric and molecular association between V1 and retinal integrity in AD. Considering the uncertainty of the relative role of visual cortex or retina in the visual deficits observed in this population, it is crucial to study both structures and their potential relationships to common disease mechanisms.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 41 subjects were recruited in the present study. We included 20 AD patients with a probable diagnosis supported by biological biomarkers (CSF and PET-PiB) and in mild stages of the disease, according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (). Patients were recruited at the Neurology Department of Coimbra University Hospital. The diagnosis criteria of AD were based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–fourth edition (DSM-IVTR) [59] and the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders (NINCDS-ADRDA) [60]. A comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation battery was administered, including (1) cognitive instruments as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) with Portuguese normative data [61, 62], the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [63, 64], and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery with normative data for the Portuguese population (BLAD) [65] exploring memory and other cognitive domains.

We considered that patients had to be in a stable condition, without acute significant events or recent/undergoing changes in medication; we defined this as exclusion criteria ophthalmological comorbidities or neurological/psychiatric conditions other than AD or CT or MRI demonstration of significant vascular burden (large cortico-subcortical infarct; extensive subcortical white matter lesions superior to 25%; uni- or bilateral thalamic lacune; lacune in head of caudate nucleus; more than 2 lacunes) (8) [60].

For the present study, we selected AD patients with a probable diagnosis supported by biological biomarkers (cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or PiB-PET). The cut-off values used in our laboratory and applied in the present study were 580 pg/mL for Aβ1–42, 0.068 for Aβ42/Aβ40, 250 pg/mL for tau, and 37 pg/mL for pTau181 (Table 1).

VariableAβ1–42 ()Aβ42/Aβ40 ()Tau ()pTau ()Tau/Aβ42 ()Aβ42/pTau ()


Aβ: amyloid beta; pTau: phosphorylated tau; SD: standard deviation.

The control group was composed of 21 individuals matched for age, education, and sex, from the community, with no history of CNS, neurodevelopmental, or mental disorders. This group was also submitted to cognitive assessment and showed no significant memory complaints (Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire-) [66, 67], had a normal general cognitive status tested by the MoCA ( (SD), ), had preserved daily living activities (Lawton and Brody scale—for ; for ) [68, 69], and no evidence of moderate or severe depressive symptoms (30-item Geriatric Depressive Scale – GDS-30, ) [70, 71].

All subjects underwent PET imaging with [11C]-PiB and [11C]-PK11195 radiotracers in two different visits with a maximum interval of 1 month. PiB positivity was determined by an experienced nuclear medicine physician, who considered simultaneously a visual regional SUVR (standard uptake value ratio) analysis and the output of a homemade support vector machine classifier. The visual analysis of these images was regional based with emphasis to frontal cortex, parietal/precuneus cortex, temporal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, and occipital cortex.

Four subjects of the control group we found with PiB positive, an increasingly frequent finding, which led to their exclusion, although the cognitive tests performed were within normal ranges.

None of the participants had history of ocular diseases, and all were submitted to a comprehensive ophthalmological examination to guarantee the absence of visual complications, which comprised visual acuity assessment with Snellen chart, ocular tension, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and OCT imaging. We involved only subjects with normal or corrected to normal vision (), with a refractive error between ±5 diopters, and without significant alterations of the optic disc or macula. Additionally, we considered exclusion criteria family history of glaucoma, or any other hereditary eye disease and diabetes or other systemic diseases that could affect the eye.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra. All subjects participated voluntarily and gave their informed written consent for the study, following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, after clarification of the nature and possible implications of the study.

2.2. Retinal Imaging

Imaging data from the retina of both eyes were obtained by optical coherence tomography through the Cirrus HD-OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) with the macular cube protocol, by one experienced technician (HQ). This protocol acquires data through a 6 mm square grid centered on the fovea by acquiring a series of 128 horizontal B-scan lines, each composed of 512 A-scans, with an axial resolution of 5 μm.

2.3. MR Imaging

Brain structural data were acquired using a whole-brain approach, with a phased array 12-channel birdcage head coil, in a Siemens Magnetom TIM Trio 3 Tesla scanner (Siemens, Munich, Germany). For each participant, one high-resolution T1-weighted three-dimensional Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) was acquired, with the following acquisition parameters: voxel resolution, repetition time (TR) 2530 ms, echo time (TE) 3.42 ms, and field of view (FOV) . The anatomical sequence comprised 176 slices, a flip angle of 7°, and an inversion time of 1100 ms.

2.4. PET Imaging

The [11C]-PiB PET and [11C]-PK11195 PET acquisitions were performed using a Philips Gemini GXL PET/CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands). Both acquisitions consisted of dynamic 3-dimensional PET scan of the entire brain (90 slices, 2 mm slice sampling) and a low-dose brain computed tomography (CT) scan, for attenuation correction. The dynamic [11C]-PiB PET image comprised 24 frames (total duration of 90 minutes: 37 frames: ) and the dynamic [11C]-PK11195 image of 22 frames (total duration of 60 minutes: ). The [11C]-PiB PET or [11C]-PK11195 PET image acquisition sessions started immediately after the intravenous bolus injection of approximately 555 MBq of [11C]-PiB or 370 MBq of [11C]-PK11195. To minimize head movement, the patients’ head was restrained with a soft elastic tape. The PET images were reconstructed to a matrix, with 2 mm isotropic voxel dimension, using the LOR RAMLA algorithm (Philips PET/CT Gemini GXL) with attenuation and scatter correction.

2.5. Cortical Thickness Assessment

Brain imaging processing was conducted in SPM12 software (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK) throughout its computational anatomy toolbox (CAT12) (, which allows fully automatic cortex segmentation and cortical thickness measurements.

The anatomic images were firstly reoriented into the AC-PC plane and then automatically corrected in order to diminish the intensity variations caused by the magnetic field and RF-field inhomogeneities. Thereon, automatic cortex segmentation in volume space of white matter-grey matter (WM-GM) and grey matter-cerebrospinal fluid (GM-CSF) boundaries was performed relying on prior probability tissue maps, assigning to each voxel a value representing the proportion of the corresponding tissue type [72].

To the spatial normalization, the subject’s brains were aligned to a standard MNI template, resorting to the high-dimensional registration DARTEL algorithm in SPM [73]. At the end of the automatic segmentation procedure, a smoothing on the normalized GM maps was applied by a 15 mm isotropic Gaussian kernel; the datasets were then submitted to well-suited fully automated thickness measurements based on the projection-based thickness method, as described by [74]. This method creates both a correct cortical thickness map and the central cortical surface in one step. The subsequent analyses were performed in surface space, which allows to reparametrize the surface mesh into a common coordinate system throughout a spherical mapping, improving the correspondence between individual subject’s areas.

Moreover, the CAT12 toolbox allows the estimation of ROI-based mean thickness values relying on internal surface maps [75]. We used the ROI-based values provided by the Human Connectome Project (HCP’s) multimodal parcellation [76] surface map, which comprises anatomically delineated V1 (see Figure 1). ROI-based thickness measures were extracted for each subject and then imported by SPSS for further statistical analysis.

2.6. Retinal Thickness Assessment

The OCT datasets underwent an automatic segmentation routine using the Iowa Reference Algorithms software (version 4.0.0, Retinal Image Analysis Lab, Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, Iowa City, IA, USA) [7779], providing the segmentation of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), inner segment/outer segment junction (IS/OS), outer segment (OS), outer segment photoreceptor/RPE complex (OPR), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). In this study, we focused on the individual layers from CGL to OPL (see Figure 2).

Each of the 128 B-scans and all the 5 surface layers were visually inspected in order to check the quality of the segmentation. Manual corrections were performed just in case of an evident algorithm failure. Subsequently, the distance (in voxels) between the respective delimiting surfaces was taken as the thickness of each layer, multiplied by the voxel size in that direction. These measurements were provided by the software based on the number of voxels and imaging depth.

We focused in central vision due to the central magnification present in V1, and given the evidence of a higher involvement of the central vision in the disease [13, 80, 81]. The thickness of each macular layer was computed as the average from a whole area of a 3 mm diameter circular map centered on the foveal pit, corresponding to inner macular ring of the standard EDTRS chart and to an eccentricity of 9.4°.

2.7. PET Imaging Preprocessing and Quantitative Analysis

A sum image obtained using all the frames of the dynamic PET was used to estimate a rigid transformation between the [11C]-PiB PET image space or [11C]-PK11195 PET image space and the T1 anatomical MRI space of each participant, using the 3D-Slicer software (version 4.8.1, BRAINS registration tool,

The individual MRI scans were spatially normalized to an MNI template using the DARTEL algorithm in SPM12.

The voxel-level quantitative analysis of [11C]-PiB PET images and [11C]-PK11195 PET images was implemented in the MNI space using in-house made software. The individual [11C]-PiB standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) map was computed by summing voxel-level signal from 40 to 70 min postinjection, and dividing by the mean signal from the individual’s reference region, the cerebellar grey matter (essentially the cerebellum without the cerebellar peduncles) [8284]. The individual [11C]-PK11195 binding potential (BPND) maps were generated using the MRTM2 (Multilinear Reference Tissue Model 2) [85]. The reference region was determined by the algorithm SVCA4 (Supervised Cluster Analysis with 4 classes: grey matter without specific binding, white matter, blood, grey matter with specific binding) [86], which selected a group of grey matter voxels showing a time-activity curve representing the kinetic activity of normal grey matter without [11C]-PK11195 specific binding.

To extract [11C]-PiB uptake and [11C]-PK11195 BPND in V1, we resorted also to the CAT12 toolbox, following a similar procedure to that one used to measure the V1 thickness values. For each participant, we first mapped each PET volume dataset in native space to the respective individual surfaces, created during the cortical thickness measurement procedure, and then, we extracted the ROI-based values using HCP’s multimodal parcellation [76] surface map, which comprises anatomically delineated V1 (Figure 1), the same used for the cortical thickness measurements. Average values of [11C]-PiB uptake and [11C]-PK1119 BPND in V1 were extracted from both hemispheres to each subject.

3. Statistical Analysis

Twenty mild-stage AD amyloid-positive patients and 17 amyloid-negative HC were considered for both retinal and cortical analyses. After the data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, -test for unpaired samples or its nonparametric version and Mann-Whitney test were used for between-group comparisons of the demographic data.

Average values of [11C]-PiB uptake, [11C]-PK11195 BPND, and thickness in V1 were estimated for each participant across both hemispheres. Concerning the retina, a mean thickness value of both eyes was calculated for each analyzed macular layer. Independent-samples -tests were computed for between-group comparisons of retinal layers thickness and V1-measured biomarkers, with exception of OPL thickness for which the Mann-Whitney test was used, given the nonnormality of the data. Thereon, partial correlation analyses between the retina thickness and V1-driven measures (thickness, Aβ load and microglia activation) were computed for each group to identify possible associations between cortex AD-related biomarkers and retina integrity, controlling for age.

Data analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22.0), and GraphPad Prism (version 6.0) was used for graphs and for slope analysis. The tests were performed two-tailed, and a threshold of was used for statistical significance.

4. Results

Concerning the demographic data, no difference in age, sex, or education was found between groups, whereas results from cognitive assessment (MoCA) were significantly different between groups, as expected (Table 2). The BLAD battery confirmed that mnestic deficits were beyond cut-off in virtually all patients (95%), as compared to executive function (70%), language (40%), constructive (25%), and calculation deficits (20%).

VariableAD group () ()HC group () ()Excluded HC () () value

Age (years)65.294 (6.459)66.250 (6.866)68.5 (6.191)0.667
Education (years)11.412 (5.063)9.300 (5.930)9 (3.830)0.239
Female/male ratio10/107/102/2
MMSE23.1 (2.97)
MoCA14.35 (4.021)24.88 (4.208)23 (4.397)<0.001

MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating; SD: standard deviation; statistical tests performed between AD an HC groups.

values of all variables included in the analysis are depicted in Table 3. Independent-samples -tests did reveal significant differences between groups regarding the V1 [11C]-PiB uptake (see Figure 3). This shows that amyloid load is already affecting V1, in spite of overall preserved thickness. No evidence for significant neuroinflammation was found as assessed by [11C]-PK11195 BPND.

VariableAD group ()HC group () value

V1 (mm)1.974 (0.114)1.957 (0.133)0.719
V1 [11C]-PiB SUVR1.4350 (0.290)1.033 (0.156)<0.0001
V1 [11C]- PK11195 BPND0.196 (0.060)0.205 (0.058)0.603
GCL (μm)41.19 (3.59)42.067 (3.99)0.488
IPL (μm)36.70 (3.16)36.15 (2.80)0.579
INL (μm)36.82 (1.99)36.50 (2.10)0.646
OPL (μm)30.42 (3.97)28.41 (2.17)0.104

V1: primary visual cortex; [11C]-PiB SUVR: Aβ PET radiotracer; [11C]-PK11195 BPND: neuroinflammation PET radiotracer binding potential; GCL: ganglion cell layer; IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; OPL: outer plexiform layer; Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.

The evidence for significant Aβ load in the absence of significant differences in visual pathways thickness assessment is consistent with the notion that our AD patients are at an early stage.

We then asked whether partial (corrected) correlation analysis, performed to study the relationship between the retina and V1, could identify distinct patterns in patients and controls. Results showed a positive correlation between the IPL and V1 thicknesses in AD group (IPL: , , Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons) (Figure 4), whereas no significant associations were found with the other layers (GCL: , ; INL: , ; OPL: , ). Considering the HC group, no significant correlation could be found between the V1 and the thickness of retinal layers. In spite of the significant structural-structural correlations, no significant structural-molecular correlations were found between the retina and V1.

Since we found evidence that V1 is already accumulating Aβ, which also target synapses early on, this positive correlation might suggest initial synaptic AD-related changes in the IPL, which is a specifically synapse-rich region in the retina accumulating amyloid both in animals [87] and humans [40]. Such association makes us suggest that this layer might serve as a biomarker for AD since the assessment of AD-related synaptic changes in the retina is faster, direct, and cost-effective way, using in vivo eye imaging techniques, than methods to assess the same mechanisms in the brain.

5. Discussion

In the present study, we were able to test whether in an early stage of the AD, the neuropathological mechanisms of the disease differently affects the integrity of retinal layers with distinct dominance of either synapses or cell bodies/nuclei between patients and healthy controls, matched for age, education, and sex. We sought for structure-structure associations (by computing partial correlations) at the level of the retina and cortex, while assessing putative biomarkers of the disease in V1—cortical thickness, neuroinflammation, and Aβ load.

Interestingly, AD patients presented higher levels of Aβ in V1 compared to controls, but no evidence of neuroinflammation. Together with the relatively preserved structural integrity, our results further suggest a relatively early disease stage. Importantly, a positive correlation between V1 thickness and the central IPL was specifically found in the AD group, suggesting a relationship between the eye and brain in the presence of Aβ load even when neuronal loss is not evident.

This striking association between a layer composed by synapses (IPL), closer to the cortex, and V1, suggests initial synaptic changes in the disease. This is an interesting finding considering previous animal studies referring IPL as a potential biomarker for the disease [49].

Taking into account current findings in AD research, namely, the evidence revealing that abnormal deposition of Aβ leads initially to synaptic dysfunction, evolving posteriorly to neuroinflammation and neuronal loss [46, 47], we suggested that in an early stage of the disease, V1 starts suffering from abnormal accumulation of Aβ, prior to detectable neuroinflammation or neuronal loss, which explains a structural association between this region and a macular layer rich in synapses. This pattern of early loss is consistent with cumulative reports suggesting that primary visual cortex is one of the later regions affected by the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease, namely, in terms of neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), neuritic plaques (NP), and lesion load [8890].

Furthermore, since we studied two synapse layers (IPL and OPL), the fact that an association was limited to IPL could be attributed to the fact that this layer is the one close to the brain, possibly suffering at first, at least partially, effects from the retrograde V1 deterioration.

Although visual deficits are one of the earliest manifestations of AD [11], there are few studies addressing specifically V1. Nevertheless, one functional study found changes in the visual field map organization and population receptive field measurements of V1 in two AD patients. In addition, one of the subjects had no changes in V1 surface area, while the other showed a reduced surface area in the most central visual field of V1, whereas the peripheral area showed the opposite pattern, when compared to controls [81].

Regarding the retina, a wide variety of studies has been conducted to assess its microstructural changes but results are still contradictory [8, 30, 53, 58, 9193]. In particular, a study suggested that both RNFL and GCL were reduced in the AD sample, whereas the external layers did not show significant differences [94]. Moreover, a GC-IPL shrinkage was found across all macular quadrants in an AD as well as in a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) group [95]. In turn, another study found no difference in GC-IPL thickness in AD compared to the control group [96], similarly to our results. Likewise, a recent study in an early-onset AD patient sample showed no significant differences in the thickness of none of the 7 layers segmented, including GCL, IPL, INL, and OPL in this group when comparing to controls [54].

Accordingly, and in contrast with our work, the majority of the studies have assessed patients in mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe stage of the disease and with no information of Aβ deposition in AD and control groups. Thus, since AD is defined by progressive neurodegeneration, it would be expected a higher decay of structural integrity in the later stages, mainly in layers composed by neuron cell bodies, resulting from the neuronal loss, in contrast with synapse loss predominant in the initial stages.

Recently, some studies have investigated whether neuronal changes in the retina are associated with other forms of structural changes, such as connectivity assessed with MRI. Particularly, in a work of our group was found a significant relationship between INL and white matter integrity (axial diffusivity) of some cortical regions, including tracts associated with the visual system (optic radiation, splenium of the corpus callosum) [97], providing independent evidence for retinocortical associations. Other study searched for associations between CG-IPL and cortical integrity in three different groups. Results demonstrated that GC-IPL shrinkage was related with smaller GM volumes and WM microstructure in healthy participants in some regions, namely, in occipital cortex and cerebellum. In turn, no association was found in the MCI or AD groups [96]. A recent study from our group also found retinocortical associations in healthy aging [98].

Finally, by means of MRI visual rating scores for cortical atrophy, a correlation in both AD and control groups between total macular thickness and parietal atrophy was reported [54]. This issue was also addressed in a sample largely composed of nondemented participants with cognitive decline, where the association of peripapillary RNFL and macular GCL-IPL thickness with cerebral GM volume was examined. An association between the reduction of occipital and temporal lobes GM volumes with GC-IPL and peripapillary RNFL thickness was found. Moreover, because dendritic atrophy might take place before retinal ganglion cell loss, it was suggested that GC-IPL could be more sensitive to the neurodegenerative process [99].

Based on the notion that synapses are an initial target of the pathological mechanism of the disease [46], an animal study has tested whether the GCL dendritic integrity might provide a marker for cerebral damage in a mouse model of amyloid pathology. By evaluating animals carrying significant cognitive deficits resulting from the cortical deposition of Aβ plaques, the authors verified that although GCL significant loss was absent, there was already significant GCL dendritic atrophy in Tg2576 mice compared to controls. They proposed that dendritic changes precede cell loss and are, therefore, likely to occur in patients with early AD. Furthermore, they raised the hypothesis that in case of a resembling GCL degenerative pattern occurs in the human retinas, the IPL would be a useful biomarker for the early detection of AD-related neurodegeneration [49].

This question was directly addressed in the present work. We report here a striking positive correlation between IPL—the layer comprising synaptic connections between dendrites of ganglion cells and other retinal neurons—and V1 in the AD group that was not present in the control group. Hence, our finding might suggest a possible subtle synaptic/dendritic failure of the retinal CG cells that might be associated with primary visual cortex integrity. In fact, considerable evidence suggests that before a massive neuronal cell death, there is synaptic dysfunction originated by oligomeric assemblies of the Aβ protein in some cortical regions [46, 48]. Thus, in case of the mechanisms underlying the AD can be transposed to the retina, the IPL would be one of the layers more prone to suffer changes in the initial stages of the disease.

Consequently, we propose that prior to tissue loss in the retina, changes in synaptic function and dendritic morphology might occur resulting from Aβ deposition, which could contribute to the earlier decline of the visual abilities involved so remarkably in the disease. Nevertheless, along with further studies better suited to directly examine the retinal synaptic function, it is still important to define the nature of the biological mechanisms underlying visual deficits in AD.

In the present study, we were able to study in detail the visual system in Alzheimer’s disease by comparing V1 measurements of AD key features and by investigating differences in the retina thickness of layers with distinct dominance of synapses/neurons cell bodies.

Our results aid in the understanding of visual processing pathway changes in AD patients and might open the door to future work addressing the IPL, using more sensitive techniques to detect synaptic changes in the early stages or prior to manifestation of AD symptoms, so that it could potentially be used as a potential biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of the disease.

Data Availability

We will be very glad to share the data of the present manuscript upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.


This work was supported by Neuroscience Mantero Belard Prize 2015 (Santa Casa da Misericórdia): Ref: MB-1049-2015 and Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (UID/NEU/04539/2013, CEECINST/00041/2018), COMPETE-FEDER (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440), MEDPERSYST (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016428), Centro 2020 (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008: BrainHealth 2020), BIGDATIMAGE (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000016), Centro 2020 FEDER, COMPETE.


  1. J. Avila, N. Pallas, M. Bolós, C. L. Sayas, and F. Hernandez, “Intracellular and extracellular microtubule associated protein tau as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 653–661, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. S. Bloom, “Amyloid-β and tau the trigger and bullet in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 505–508, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Hardy and D. Selkoe, “The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5580, pp. 353–356, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. T. Oliveira, P. R. Louzada, F. G. de Mello, and S. T. Ferreira, “Amyloid-β decreases nitric oxide production in cultured retinal neurons: a possible mechanism for synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease?” Neurochemical Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 163–169, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Pasqualetti, D. J. Brooks, and P. Edison, “The role of neuroinflammation in dementias,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 17, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. J. Selkoe, “Cell biology of protein misfolding: the examples of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1054–1061, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Krasodomska, W. Lubiński, A. Potemkowski, and K. Honczarenko, “Pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and pattern visual evoked potential (PVEP) in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease,” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. Berisha, G. T. Feke, C. L. Trempe, J. W. McMeel, and C. L. Schepens, “Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 2285–2289, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Y. L. Chang, J. Lowe, A. Ardiles et al., “Alzheimer’s disease in the human eye. Clinical tests that identify ocular and visual information processing deficit as biomarkers,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. F. Z. Javaid, J. Brenton, L. Guo, and M. F. Cordeiro, “Visual and ocular manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease and their use as biomarkers for diagnosis and progression,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. Katz and S. Rimmer, “Ophthalmologic manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. A. Sadun and C. J. Bassi, “Optic nerve damage in Alzheimer’s disease,” Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Cronin-Golomb, R. Sugiura, S. Corkin, and J. H. Growdon, “Incomplete achromatopsia in Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 471–477, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. C. Gilmore, K. E. Groth, and C. W. Thomas, “Stimulus contrast and word reading speed in Alzheimer’s disease,” Experimental Aging Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Park, T. F. Brady, M. R. Greene, and A. Oliva, “Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1333–1340, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. L. Risacher, D. Wudunn, S. M. Pepin et al., “Visual contrast sensitivity in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and older adults with cognitive complaints,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1133–1144, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Salamone, C. Di Lorenzo, S. Mosti et al., “Color discrimination performance in patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 501–507, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. L. Trick, L. R. Trick, P. Morris, and M. Wolf, “Visual field loss in senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type,” Neurology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. A. Valenti, “Alzheimer’s disease: screening biomarkers using frequency doubling technology visual field,” ISRN Neurology, vol. 2013, Article ID 989583, 9 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. C. Gilmore, H. E. Wenk, L. A. Naylor, and E. Koss, “Motion perception and Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. P52–P57, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Graewe, R. Lemos, C. Ferreira et al., “Impaired processing of 3D motion-defined faces in mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: an fMRI study,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2489–2499, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. Kavcic, W. Vaughn, and C. J. Duffy, “Distinct visual motion processing impairments in aging and Alzheimer’s disease,” Vision Research, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 386–395, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Lemos, P. Figueiredo, I. Santana, M. R. Simões, and M. Castelo-Branco, “Temporal integration of 3D coherent motion cues defining visual objects of unknown orientation is impaired in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 885–896, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. A. Armstrong, “Visual field defects in Alzheimer’s disease patients may reflect differential pathology in the primary visual cortex,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 677–682, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. G. Cogan, “Visual disturbances with focal progressive dementing disease,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 68–72, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. Leuba and R. Kraftsik, “Visual cortex in Alzheimer’s disease: occurencee of neuronal death and glial proliferation, and correlation with pathological hallmarks,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. H. Morrison, P. R. Hof, and C. Bouras, “An anatomic substrate for visual disconnection in Alzheimer’s disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 640, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. U. Löffler, D. P. Edward, and M. O. Tso, “Immunoreactivity against tau, amyloid precursor protein, and beta-amyloid in the human retina,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  29. V. Parisi, “Correlation between morphological and functional retinal impairment in patients affected by ocular hypertension, glaucoma, demyelinating optic neuritis and Alzheimer’s disease,” Seminars in Ophthalmology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 50–57, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Parisi, R. Restuccia, F. Fattapposta, C. Mina, M. G. Bucci, and F. Pierelli, “Morphological and functional retinal impairment in Alzheimer’s disease patients,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 1860–1867, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. K. Iseri, Ö. Altinaş, T. Tokay, and N. Yüksel, “Relationship between cognitive impairment and retinal morphological and visual functional abnormalities in Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. S. Byerly and S. Blackshaw, “Vertebrate retina and hypothalamus development,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Systems Biology and Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 380–389, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. L. Chow and R. A. Lang, “Early eye development in vertebrates,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 255–296, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. J. Maude, A. M. Dondorp, A. A. Sayeed, N. P. J. Day, N. J. White, and N. A. V. Beare, “The eye in cerebral malaria: what can it teach us?” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 661–664, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Trost, S. Lange, F. Schroedl et al., “Brain and retinal pericytes: origin, function and role,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. K. Archibald, M. P. Clarke, U. P. Mosimann, and D. J. Burn, “The retina in Parkinson’s disease,” Brain, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1128–1145, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. A. Calabresi, L. J. Balcer, and E. M. Frohman, “Retinal pathology in multiple sclerosis: insight into the mechanisms of neuronal pathology,” Brain, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1575–1577, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. London, I. Benhar, and M. Schwartz, “The retina as a window to the brain —from eye research to CNS disorders,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. L. E. Goldstein, J. A. Muffat, R. A. Cherny et al., “Cytosolic β-amyloid deposition and supranuclear cataracts in lenses from people with Alzheimer’s disease,” Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9365, pp. 1258–1265, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Koronyo-Hamaoui, Y. Koronyo, A. V. Ljubimov et al., “Identification of amyloid plaques in retinas from Alzheimer’s patients and noninvasive in vivo optical imaging of retinal plaques in a mouse model,” NeuroImage, vol. 54, pp. S204–S217, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. La Morgia, F. N. Ross-Cisneros, Y. Koronyo et al., “Melanopsin retinal ganglion cell loss in Alzheimer disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 90–109, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. Schön, N. A. Hoffmann, S. M. Ochs et al., “Long-term in vivo imaging of fibrillar tau in the retina of P301S transgenic mice,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 12, article e53547, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. M. Sivak, “The aging eye: common degenerative mechanisms between the Alzheimer’s brain and retinal disease,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 871–880, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Hoon, H. Okawa, L. Della Santina, and R. O. L. Wong, “Functional architecture of the retina: development and disease,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 42, pp. 44–84, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. C. Nag and S. Wadhwa, “Ultrastructure of the human retina in aging and various pathological states,” Micron, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 759–781, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. J. Selkoe, “Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5594, pp. 789–791, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Bastin, M. A. Bahri, F. Meyer et al., “In vivo imaging of synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with [18F]UCB-H positron emission tomography,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 390–402, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. H. Small, S. S. Mok, and J. C. Bornstein, “Alzheimer’s disease and Aβ toxicity: from top to bottom,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 595–598, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. A. Williams, R. A. Thirgood, H. Oliphant et al., “Retinal ganglion cell dendritic degeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1799–1806, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Liu, J. Duggan, T. E. Salt, and M. F. Cordeiro, “Dendritic changes in visual pathways in glaucoma and other neurodegenerative conditions,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 244–250, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. J. Ascaso, N. Cruz, P. J. Modrego et al., “Retinal alterations in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an optical coherence tomography study,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 261, no. 8, pp. 1522–1530, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. Coppola, A. Di Renzo, L. Ziccardi et al., “Optical coherence tomography in Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0134750, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. L. Gao, Y. Liu, X. Li, Q. Bai, and P. Liu, “Abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macula lutea in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 162–167, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Haan, S. F. Janssen, J. A. Kreeke, P. Scheltens, F. D. Verbraak, and F. H. Bouwman, “Retinal thickness correlates with parietal cortical atrophy in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease and controls,” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Jentsch, D. Schweitzer, K.-U. Schmidtke et al., “Retinal fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy measures depend on the severity of Alzheimer’s disease,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. e241–e247, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. H. Kergoat, M. J. Kergoat, L. Justino, H. Chertkow, A. Robillard, and H. Bergman, “An evaluation of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 187–191, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. A. Kurna, G. Akar, A. Altun, Y. Agirman, E. Gozke, and T. Sengor, “Confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic nerve head on the patients with Alzheimer’s disease compared to glaucoma and control,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1203–1211, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Y. Lu, Z. Li, X. Zhang et al., “Retinal nerve fiber layer structure abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease: evidence in optical coherence tomography,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 480, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), American Psychiatric Association Publishing, Washington, DC, 4th edition, 2000.
  60. G. M. McKhann, D. S. Knopman, H. Chertkow et al., “The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, ““Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Freitas, M. R. Simões, L. Alves, and I. Santana, “The relevance of sociodemographic and health variables on MMSE normative data,” Applied Neuropsychology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 311–319, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Freitas, M. R. Simões, L. Alves, and I. Santana, “Montreal cognitive assessment: validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Z. S. Nasreddine, N. A. Phillips, V. Ã.©. Bédirian et al., “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 695–699, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Guerreiro, Contributo da neuropsicologia para o estudo das demências [Contribution of Neuropsychology to the Study of Dementia], University of Lisbon, 1998.
  66. S. Ginó, T. Mendes, F. Ribeiro, A. Mendonça, M. Guerreiro, and C. Garcia, “Escala de Queixas de Memória [Subjective memory complaints],” in Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demências [Study Group on Brain Aging and Dementia]. Escalas e Testes Na Demência [Scales and Tests in Dementia], C. Mendonça, C. Garcia, and M. Guerreiro, Eds., pp. 116–120, GEECD, Lisbon, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  67. B. Schmand, C. Jonker, C. Hooijer, and J. Lindeboom, “Subjective memory complaints may announce dementia,” Neurology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. P. Lawton and E. M. Brody, “Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living,” The Gerontologist, vol. 9, 3 Part 1, pp. 179–186, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. Madureira and A. Verdelho, “Escala de Actividades Instrumentais de Vida Diária [Instrumental activities of daily living],” in Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demências [Study Group on Brain Aging and Dementia]. Escalas e Testes Na Demência [Scales and Tests in Dementia], C. Mendonça, C. Garcia, and M. Guerreiro, Eds., pp. 121–124, GEECD, Lisbon, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  70. J. Barreto, A. Leuschner, F. Santos, and M. Sobral, “Escala de Depressão Geriátrica [Geriatric depressive scale],” in Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demências [Study Group on Brain Aging and Dementia]. Escalas e Testes Na Demência [Scales and Tests in Dementia], C. Mendonça, C. Garcia, and M. Guerreiro, Eds., pp. 69–72, GEECD, Lisbon, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  71. J. A. Yesavage, T. L. Brink, T. L. Rose et al., “Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 17, pp. 37–49, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  72. J. Ashburner and K. J. Friston, “Unified segmentation,” NeuroImage, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 839–851, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. Ashburner, “A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm,” NeuroImage, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 95–113, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. R. Dahnke, R. A. Yotter, and C. Gaser, “Cortical thickness and central surface estimation,” NeuroImage, vol. 65, pp. 336–348, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. Gaser and R. Dahnke, CAT-A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for the Analysis of Structural MRI Data, Organization for Human Brain Mapping, 2016.
  76. M. F. Glasser, T. S. Coalson, E. C. Robinson et al., “A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex,” Nature, vol. 536, no. 7615, pp. 171–178, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. D. Abràmoff, M. K. Garvin, and M. Sonka, “Retinal imaging and image analysis,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 169–208, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. K. Garvin, M. D. Abramoff, Xiaodong Wu, S. R. Russell, T. L. Burns, and M. Sonka, “Automated 3-D intraretinal layer segmentation of macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1436–1447, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. K. Li, X. Wu, D. Z. Chen, and M. Sonka, “Optimal surface segmentation in volumetric images—a graph-theoretic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 119–134, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. C. Blanks, Y. Torigoe, D. R. Hinton, and R. H. I. Blanks, “Retinal pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. I. Ganglion cell loss in foveal/parafoveal retina,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 377–384, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. A. Brewer and B. Barton, “Visual cortex in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: changes in visual field maps and population receptive fields,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, p. 74, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. J. F. J. Bonilla and J. M. C. Carril, “Molecular neuroimaging in degenerative dementias,” Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular (English Edition), vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 301–309, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. L. McNamee, S.-H. Yee, J. C. Price et al., “Consideration of optimal time window for Pittsburgh compound B PET summed uptake measurements,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 348–355, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. F. Oliveira, A. Leuzy, J. Castelhano et al., “Data driven diagnostic classification in Alzheimer’s disease based on different reference regions for normalization of PiB-PET images and correlation with CSF concentrations of Aβ species,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 20, pp. 603–610, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. M. Ichise, J.-S. Liow, J.-Q. Lu et al., “Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C] DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1096–1112, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. M. Yaqub, B. N. van Berckel, A. Schuitemaker et al., “Optimization of supervised cluster analysis for extracting reference tissue input curves in (R)-[11C]PK11195 brain PET studies,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1600–1608, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. S. E. Perez, S. Lumayag, B. Kovacs, E. J. Mufson, and S. Xu, “β-amyloid deposition and functional impairment in the retina of the APPswe/PS1DeltaE9 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 793–800, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. P. Giannakopoulos, G. Gold, M. Duc, J. P. Michel, P. R. Hof, and C. Bouras, “Neuroanatomic correlates of visual agnosia in Alzheimer’s disease: a clinicopathologic study,” Neurology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. G. R. Jackson and C. Owsley, “Visual dysfunction, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging,” Neurologic Clinics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 709–728, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. D. A. Lewis, M. J. Campbell, R. D. Terry, and J. H. Morrison, “Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1799–1808, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. Kesler, V. Vakhapova, A. D. Korczyn, E. Naftaliev, and M. Neudorfer, “Retinal thickness in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 523–526, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. T. Moreno-Ramos, J. Benito-León, A. Villarejo, and F. Bermejo-Pareja, “Retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 659–664, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. C. Paquet, M. Boissonnot, F. Roger, P. Dighiero, R. Gil, and J. Hugon, “Abnormal retinal thickness in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 420, no. 2, pp. 97–99, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. E. Marziani, S. Pomati, P. Ramolfo et al., “Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer thickness in Alzheimer’s disease using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 9, article 5953, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. C. Y. Cheung, Y. T. Ong, S. Hilal et al., “Retinal ganglion cell analysis using high-definition optical coherence tomography in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. S. Liu, Y. T. Ong, S. Hilal et al., “The association between retinal neuronal layer and brain structure is disrupted in patients with cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 585–595, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. C. Alves, L. Jorge, N. Canário et al., “Interplay between macular retinal changes and white matter integrity in early Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 723–732, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. L. Jorge, N. Canário, H. Quental, R. Bernardes, and M. Castelo-Branco, “Is the retina a mirror of the aging brain? Aging of neural retina layers and primary visual cortex across the lifespan,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 360, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. Y.-T. Ong, S. Hilal, C. Y. Cheung et al., “Retinal neurodegeneration on optical coherence tomography and cerebral atrophy,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 584, pp. 12–16, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Lília Jorge et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.