Aerobic Exercise and Human Visual Cortex Neuroplasticity: A Narrative Review

Abuleil, Dania; Thompson, Benjamin; Dalton, Kristine

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6771999

Neural Plasticity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6771999 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6771999

Aerobic Exercise and Human Visual Cortex Neuroplasticity: A Narrative Review

Dania Abuleil,^1,2Benjamin Thompson,^1,2and Kristine Dalton^1,2

Academic Editor: J. Michael Wyss

Received16 Apr 2022

Accepted07 Jul 2022

Published23 Jul 2022

Abstract

There is compelling evidence from animal models that physical exercise can enhance visual cortex neuroplasticity. In this narrative review, we explored whether exercise has the same effect in humans. We found that while some studies report evidence consistent with exercise-induced enhancement of human visual cortex neuroplasticity, others report no effect or even reduced neuroplasticity following exercise. Differences in study methodology may partially explain these varying results. Because the prospect of exercise increasing human visual cortex neuroplasticity has important implications for vision rehabilitation, additional research is required to resolve this discrepancy in the literature.

1. Introduction

The visual cortex exhibits pronounced neuroplasticity during a “critical” or “sensitive” period of early development [1]. After the closure of this critical period, which in humans is estimated to occur at approximately age 7 [2], visual cortex neuroplasticity is attenuated [3]. However, recent evidence in both animal models and humans suggests that adult visual cortex neuroplasticity can be boosted by a range of interventions including environmental enrichment [4, 5], pharmacological manipulation [6–10], noninvasive brain stimulation (see [11] for a comprehensive review, [12–15]), and aerobic exercise [16–18].

Of these various neuroplasticity enhancers, aerobic exercise is perhaps the most attractive because of its general health benefits. There is strong evidence that physical exercise can enhance neuroplasticity in cortical networks ([19]; see [20] for a recent review; [21]). In particular, enhanced cognitive and motor performance has been positively associated with exercise and physical activity [22, 23]. For instance, rodents with access to a running wheel performed better on learning and memory tasks compared to rodents without a running wheel in their cage [24]. Additionally, exercise can protect against the negative physiological and behavioral impacts of stress [25, 26] that include reduced neuroplasticity and neurogenesis ([27]; see [28] for an overview). One potential mechanism for this effect is an exercise-induced increase in production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that supports and maintains neuronal growth and maturation [29] and enhances neuroplasticity (see [30] for a comprehensive review). However, as described below, while there is also strong evidence that aerobic exercise enhances visual cortex neuroplasticity in animal models, studies involving human participants have produced widely varying results. Here, we review both animal and human studies investigating the effects of exercise on visual cortex plasticity, either alone or in combination with another neuroplasticity modulating technique. We also consider factors that may explain differing results across studies. In particular, we suggest that inconsistencies in the results of human studies may be attributed, in part, to variations in the intensity and amount of exercise, the timing of exercise with respect to the outcome measure, and the psychophysical task used to index neuroplasticity. We conclude by suggesting ways to advance the field.

2. Measures of Visual Cortex Neuroplasticity in Animal Models

Common measures of visual cortex neuroplasticity in animal models involve deprivation of one eye [31]. When visual cortex neuroplasticity is high, monocular deprivation causes a pronounced shift in visual cortex ocular dominance whereby the proportion of cells that show a larger response to stimulation of the nondeprived eye relative to the deprived eye increases [1]. The magnitude of this ocular dominance plasticity is typically measured electrophysiologically and can be used as an index of visual cortex neuroplasticity. In addition, monocular deprivation during the critical period causes deprivation amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental vision disorder characterized by poor amblyopic eye visual acuity and loss of binocular vision in animal models [32–34]. Recovery of vision in post-critical-period animals with deprivation amblyopia requires significant visual cortex neuroplasticity. Therefore, the extent of vision recovery measured electrophysiologically or behaviorally can be used to index visual cortex neuroplasticity.

3. Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Visual Cortex Neuroplasticity in Animal Models

3.1. Physiological Changes

Studies of rodents have revealed several exercise-induced neurochemical and physiological changes within the visual cortex that may enhance neuroplasticity [35–38]. These changes include a general reduction in cortical inhibition within the primary visual cortex [36] as well as an upregulation and activation of neural growth factors such as BDNF, IGF-1, and VEGF [37], all thought to stimulate neurogenesis or neural growth [35]. Physical activity in rodents also enhances pyramidal cell firing in the primary visual cortex which alters the response of cells in V1 to visual input [38, 39] and improves visual cortex response gain [40–42].

3.2. Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects

In addition to the physiological changes that occur within the visual cortex during and after physical exercise, animal studies have also demonstrated effects on visual perception such as improved object recognition [43] and enhanced discrimination of bidirectional moving gratings [44]. There is strong evidence that exercise, particularly voluntary exercise, enhances ocular dominance plasticity in adult rodents measured using in vivo electrophysiology [45–47]. Adult mice in environments with running wheels showed more pronounced ocular dominance plasticity following 7 days of monocular deprivation compared to mice without a running wheel. Furthermore, physical exercise alongside environmental enrichment allowed for the recovery of amblyopia in adult rats [45]. Rats were rendered amblyopic by performing an eyelid suture at P21 followed by a reverse-suture (opening the closed eye and closing the open eye) at P70. Adult rats were then placed in different environments to assess the factors that enhance vision recovery including visual enrichment, motor enrichment, and classic bright conditions, as well as dark conditions. Rats in the exercise condition recovered normal visual acuity and ocular dominance, indicating enhanced neuroplasticity.

4. Measures of Visual Cortex Neuroplasticity in Humans

Many studies investigating visual cortex neuroplasticity enhancement in humans utilize visual perceptual learning paradigms, where repeated exposure to a visual task leads to improved task performance [48–51]. Visual perceptual learning is likely to involve training-induced changes at multiple stages of the cortical visual processing hierarchy [52, 53], and interventions that enhance visual cortex neuroplasticity are expected to increase the rate, magnitude, and/or generalizability of learning. Another common index of human visual cortex neuroplasticity involves the use of short-term monocular occlusion to transiently alter ocular dominance. Specifically, patching one eye for two hours has been found to strengthen the contribution of the deprived eye during binocular viewing, with Lunghi et al. [54] being the first group to demonstrate this effect in young heathy adults. Other studies replicated these findings using psychophysical [55, 56] and electrophysiological [57, 58], as well as imaging [59–61] techniques. The magnitude of the ocular dominance shift or, to borrow a term from the animal literature, ocular dominance plasticity can be used as a measure of visual cortex neuroplasticity.

5. Effect of Aerobic Exercise in Humans

The ability of exercise to enhance visual cortex neuroplasticity is evident in animal models; however, these effects have yet to be unequivocally demonstrated in human adults, while there is some evidence to support the notion that exercise can augment visual cortex neuroplasticity in healthy young adults [17, 18, 21, 62, 63], other studies report no effect of exercise [16, 64–67] and possibly a counterproductive effect depending on the timing of exercise [68] (see Table 1). Nonetheless, structural and neurochemical changes within the human brain have been associated with exercise [69, 70]. The balance between excitation and inhibition within the visual cortex is thought to modulate neuroplasticity, whereby an increase in excitation promotes plasticity [59, 61, 71, 72]. One way to assess changes in inhibitory tone within the human visual cortex is to measure the relative local concentrations of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Maddock et al. [18] found that exercise increased the concentrations of both GABA and glutamate within the visual cortex suggesting a greater availability of neurochemicals without a change in the balance of excitation and inhibition. Another approach is to measure the amplitude of visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to assess changes in visual cortex excitability. Using this approach, Bullock et al. [73] observed that low intensity physical exercise increased visual cortex excitability (exercise increased VEP amplitude). The extent to which these neurochemical and excitability changes induced by exercise alter visual cortex neuroplasticity remains unclear.

In support of the theory that exercise enhances human visual cortex neuroplasticity, Lunghi and Sale [17] observed that young adults exhibited greater ocular dominance plasticity following exercise and monocular deprivation as compared to rest and monocular deprivation [17]. This effect was demonstrated with a binocular rivalry visual task that involved the dichoptic presentation of orthogonal gratings while participants reported their percept (the left eye grating, right eye grating, or a mixture of both) over the span of 2 hours. The deprived eye dominated perception for a longer period in the exercise group indicating a larger ocular dominance shift presumably enabled by increased visual cortex neuroplasticity.

Recently, Virathone et al. [21] observed that mild-to-moderate cycling completed in 10-minute intervals distributed across 2 hours reduced binocular rivalry eye dominance in young healthy adults. This finding demonstrates that exercise alone without monocular deprivation, visual learning paradigms, or other interventions may impact binocular rivalry outcomes, perhaps by reducing cortical inhibition.

Other studies have investigated the effects of physical exercise on vision and visual cortex neuroplasticity in older adults. An early study found that aerobic exercise enhanced visual attention in older adults aged 65 to 74 as compared to their younger counterparts aged 20-35 [74]. Additionally, several studies have found that although brain volume decreases with age [75], older adults who are more physically active have higher brain volume [76–78]. As cortical function declines with maturation, it appears that physical exercise may counteract or slow the effects of aging. In addition to the older adult population, one study has reported improved vision following physical exercise in patients with amblyopia [79]. Visual acuity and stereoacuity improved after six daily cycling sessions in adults with anisometropic amblyopia [79]. However, these effects may have been due to a parallel intervention (reverse patching) that the participants received during exercise that was not controlled for in the experimental design.

Zhou et al. [16] attempted to replicate the exercise-induced enhancement of ocular dominance plasticity reported by Lunghi and Sale [17] using a binocular combination task. Participants were presented with dichoptic gratings that had the same spatial frequency but different phases and reported the perceived phase when the gratings were fused. The perceived phase is biased towards the phase presented to the dominant eye. The authors found no significant effect of physical exercise on ocular dominance plasticity [16]. In a subsequent study, the group was also unable to replicate Lunghi and Sale’s [17] results despite using an identical visual task [21, 67]. An absence of exercise effects has also been reported in studies using EEG [65], psychophysical surround suppression [64, 65], and perceptual learning [68] to assess visual cortex neuroplasticity.

Therefore, in contrast to studies involving animals, studies into a link between exercise and visual cortex neuroplasticity in humans are inconclusive. In the following sections, we identify discrepancies across human studies and suggest how we may reconcile these differences.

6. Protocol Discrepancies

Most research into the effects of exercise on vision or visual cortex neuroplasticity in humans incorporates some form of aerobic exercise such as running, jogging, or cycling. However, exercise intensity, exercise dosage, the timing of exercise, and the outcome measure differ across studies.

6.1. Exercise Intensity

Many studies incorporate moderate to intense exercise, determined primarily by a target heart rate or a VO2 max measurement. In a recent study of motor cortex plasticity, exercise intensity was found to be an important variable whereby high intensity exercise enhanced neuroplasticity more than moderate exercise [80]. This study measured cortico-motor excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Whether this effect of exercise intensity holds for the visual cortex is unknown. For instance, no enhancement of visual cortex neuroplasticity following high intensity exercise has been shown across multiple studies [16, 64, 66, 67], while others found evidence of neuroplasticity enhancement [17, 18, 21, 63]. On the other hand, moderate exercise seems to have no effect on visual cortex neuroplasticity [16, 65, 68]. It is also important to note that each study incorporated the exercise component in a slightly different manner (see Timing: Concurrent vs. Sequential Exercise and Table 1); however, further investigation into whether exercise intensity matters for induction of visual cortex neuroplasticity is warranted.

6.2. Exercise Dosage

A key aspect of integrating exercise into a visual perceptual learning protocol is determining how many sessions participants should complete. This is particularly important for potential future clinical applications of the exercise interventions. One session of high intensity exercise, lasting at least 8 minutes, resulted in visual neuroplasticity enhancement seen as a shift in ocular dominance or changes in the concentration of GABA and glutamate [17, 18, 63] (Table 1). A study by Lunghi et al. [79] incorporated six consecutive days of high intensity exercise and reported visual acuity and stereoacuity improvements in adult patients with anisometropic amblyopia that persisted for up to one year when combined with patching. However, as noted above, another treatment was also administered at the same time as the exercise. However, the majority of studies have reported no enhancement in visual cortex plasticity following one session of exercise [16, 64, 65, 67] or multiple sessions of exercise [66, 68]. While the use of consecutive sessions of exercise in humans was adapted from animal model studies that showed longer lasting effects and larger enhancement as compared to a single bout of exercise [46, 81], it remains to be seen whether these results apply to adult humans and are consistent across populations.

6.3. Timing: Concurrent vs. Sequential Exercise

While some animal model studies observed enhanced visual cortex plasticity when outcome measures were asynchronous with exercise [46], studies where outcome measures that were synchronous with exercise seem to demonstrate the largest neuroplasticity enhancement. For instance, mice exhibited enhanced detection and discrimination of visual stimuli during exercise but not before or after exercise [39, 44, 81] (Table 1). However, psychophysical measurements during exercise in humans are more difficult to execute. Only one study with humans by Benjamin et al. [65] incorporated concurrent low intensity exercise—specifically walking—while surround suppression was measured psychophysically. Contrary to the animal studies, no enhancement was reported. The logistical complications that arise with the adult human population exercising (running or cycling) at high intensity while focusing on a visual task have logically pushed researchers to take vision measurements either before or after exercise. This may be a reason for the discrepancies between animal and human studies, particularly as exercise either before or after vision measurements or perceptual learning has yielded mixed results; one study even finding that exercise before a vision training session impairs visual perceptual learning [68].

6.4. Psychophysical Task

A wide variety of vision tasks and outcome measures have been used by studies of exercise and visual cortex neuroplasticity which may have contributed to the variability in results. Psychophysical tasks that have been employed include binocular rivalry [17, 21, 67], orientation discrimination [63], vernier acuity [66], surround suppression [64, 65], and motion direction discrimination [68]. The variety of psychophysical tasks complicate the comparison of results across studies, particularly since different tasks may recruit differing networks of visual cortical areas (Table 1). It is possible that exercise affects regions of the brain differently depending on their cortical and neurochemical composition. A recent study found that the physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation differ across cortical regions [82]. As physical exercise appears to interact with neurochemicals in a similar way to noninvasive brain stimulation, the effects of physical exercise may also differ across various brain regions, influencing distinct visual tasks differently. The relatively recent literature has yet to investigate the impact of exercise on different psychophysical tasks within the same study or assess the visual cortex neurochemical changes before, during, and after physical exercise. In addition, many studies of humans involve young adults who are likely to have a high level of fitness because they have volunteered for an exercise study. Whether baseline fitness level interacts with the effects of exercise on the visual cortex is currently unknown.

7. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

While there is strong evidence from animal models to support the hypothesis that physical exercise can enhance visual cortex plasticity, the results from human studies are variable and are inconclusive. Protocol discrepancies such as exercise intensity, exercise dosage, timing of exercise relative to outcome measures, psychophysical task, and sample population complicate the comparison across the studies. High intensity exercise during perceptual learning may have an increased likelihood of revealing a neuroplasticity enhancement effect as this method shows promising results in animal models. As such, a protocol where visual training can take place while participants exercise intensely should be investigated. If physical exercise indeed influences the human visual cortex and enhances neuroplasticity as seen in animal models, it could be used a rehabilitation treatment for the recovery or improvement of visual function in adults suffering from a wide variety of vision conditions. Further research in this area is warranted.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government and InnoHK, as well as the Natural Science and Engineering Council (NSERC) grants RPIN-05394 and RGPAS-477166.

References

T. N. Wiesel and D. H. Hubel, “Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1003–1017, 1963.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Hooks and C. Chen, “Critical periods in the visual system: changing views for a model of experience-dependent plasticity,” Neuron, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 312–326, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Bang, G. Hamilton-Fletcher, and K. C. Chan, “Visual plasticity in adulthood: perspectives from Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity,” The Neuroscientist, no. article 107385842110376, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kalogeraki, J. Pielecka-fortuna, and S. Lo, “Environmental enrichment accelerates ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex whereas transfer to standard cages resulted in a rapid loss of increased plasticity,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–24, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sale, J. F. M. Vetencourt, P. Medini et al., “Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 679–681, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Deidda, M. Allegra, C. Cerri et al., “Early depolarizing GABA controls critical-period plasticity in the rat visual cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 18, pp. 87–96, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Harauzov, M. Spolidoro, G. DiCristo et al., “Reducing intracortical inhibition in the adult visual cortex promotes ocular dominance plasticity,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 361–371, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. F. Heise, M. Niehoff, J.-F. Feldheim, G. Liuzzi, C. Gerloff, and F. C. Hummel, “Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 146, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Romero, M. Davare, M. Armendariz, and P. Janssen, “Neural effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation at the single-cell level,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. M. Vetencourt, A. Sale, A. Viegi et al., “The antidepressant fluoxetine restores plasticity in the adult visual cortex,” Science, vol. 320, pp. 385–388, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Antal, M. Nitsche, and W. Paulus, “Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 459–463, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Behrens, A. Kraft, K. Irlbacher, H. Gerhardt, M. C. Olma, and S. A. Brandt, “Long-lasting enhancement of visual perception with repetitive noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 11, pp. 1–10, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. K. Esser, R. Huber, M. Massimini, M. J. J. Peterson, F. Ferrarelli, and G. Tononi, “A direct demonstration of cortical LTP in humans: a combined TMS/EEG study,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Nitsche, S. Doemkes, T. Karaköse et al., “Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 3109–3117, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Thompson, B. Mansouri, L. Koski, and R. F. Hess, “Brain plasticity in the adult: modulation of function in amblyopia with rTMS,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1067–1071, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, A. Reynaud, and R. F. Hess, “Aerobic exercise effects on ocular dominance plasticity with a phase combination task in human adults,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2017, Article ID 4780876, 7 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lunghi and A. Sale, “A cycling lane for brain rewiring,” Current Biology, vol. 25, no. 23, pp. R1122–R1123, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Maddock, G. A. Casazza, D. H. Fernandez, and M. I. Maddock, “Acute modulation of cortical glutamate and GABA content by physical activity,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2449–2457, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Hillman, K. I. Erickson, and A. F. Kramer, “Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition,” Nature, vol. 9, pp. 58–65, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Fernandes, R. M. Arida, and F. Gomez-Pinilla, “Physical exercise as an epigenetic modulator of brain plasticity and cognition,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 80, pp. 443–456, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Virathone, B. N. Nguyen, F. Dobson, O. L. Carter, and A. M. McKendrick, “Exercise alone impacts short-term adult visual neuroplasticity in a monocular deprivation paradigm,” Journal of Vision, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 12, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. R. Pierson and H. J. Montoye, “Movement time, reaction time and age,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 418–421, 1958.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. W. Spirduso, “Reaction and movement time as a function of age and physical activity level,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 435–440, 1975.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. E. Fordyce and J. M. Wehner, “Physical activity enhances spatial learning performance with an associated alteration in hippocampal protein kinase C activity in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice,” Brain Research, vol. 619, no. 1-2, pp. 111–119, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. N. Greenwood and M. Fleshner, “Exercise, stress resistance, and central serotonergic systems,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 140–149, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pittenger and R. S. Duman, “Stress, depression, and neuroplasticity: a convergence of mechanisms,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 88–109, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. T. Kolassa and T. Elbert, “Structural and functional neuroplasticity in relation to traumatic stress,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 321–325, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Kays, R. A. Hurley, and K. H. Taber, “The dynamic brain: neuroplasticity and mental health,” The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 118–124, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Marais, D. J. Stein, and W. M. U. Daniels, “Exercise increases BDNF levels in the striatum and decreases depressive-like behavior in chronically stressed rats,” Metabolic Brain Disease, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 587–597, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Davidson and B. S. Mcewen, “Social influences on neuroplasticity: stress and interventions to promote well-being,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 689–695, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. von Noorden and M. L. Crawford, “The sensitive period,” Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom, vol. 99, pp. 442–446, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
N. W. N. W. Daw, “Critical periods and amblyopia,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 502–505, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. Hensch, “Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 877–888, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Holman, K. R. Duffy, and D. E. Mitchell, “Short periods of darkness fail to restore visual or neural plasticity in adult cats,” Visual Neuroscience, vol. 35, p. E002, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. El-Sayes, D. Harasym, C. V. Turco, M. B. Locke, and A. J. Nelson, “Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: a mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–85, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Fu, M. Kaneko, Y. Tang, A. Alvarez-Buylla, and M. P. Stryker, “A cortical disinhibitory circuit for enhancing adult plasticity,” eLife, vol. 4, pp. 1–12, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Neeper, F. Gómez-Pinilla, J. Choi, and C. W. Cotman, “Physical activity increases mRNA for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor in rat brain,” Brain Research, vol. 726, no. 1-2, pp. 49–56, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Niell and M. P. Stryker, “Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex,” Neuron, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 472–479, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kaneko and M. P. Stryker, “Sensory experience during locomotion promotes recovery of function in adult visual cortex,” eLife, vol. 3, pp. 1–16, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ayaz, A. B. Saleem, M. L. Schölvinck, and M. Carandini, “Locomotion controls spatial integration in mouse visual cortex,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 890–894, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-O. Polack, J. Friedman, and P. Golshani, “Cellular mechanisms of brain state-dependent gain modulation in visual cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1331–1339, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Saleem, A. I. Ayaz, K. J. Jeffery, K. D. Harris, and M. Carandini, “Integration of visual motion and locomotion in mouse visual cortex,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1864–1869, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. O’Callaghan, R. Ohle, and Á. M. Kelly, “The effects of forced exercise on hippocampal plasticity in the rat: a comparison of LTP, spatial- and non-spatial learning,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 362–366, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Dadarlat and M. P. Stryker, “Locomotion enhances neural encoding of visual stimuli in mouse V1,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 3764–3775, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Baroncelli, J. Bonaccorsi, M. Milanese et al., “Enriched experience and recovery from amblyopia in adult rats: impact of motor, social and sensory components,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 2388–2397, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kalogeraki, F. Greifzu, F. Haack, and S. Lowel, “Voluntary physical exercise promotes ocular dominance plasticity in adult mouse primary visual cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 46, pp. 15476–15481, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kalogeraki, J. Pielecka-Fortuna, J. M. Hüppe, and S. Löwel, “Physical exercise preserves adult visual plasticity in mice and restores it after a stroke in the somatosensory cortex,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 8, pp. 1–15, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Gilbert, W. Li, and V. Piech, “Perceptual learning and adult cortical plasticity,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 587, no. 12, pp. 2743–2751, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Hussain, B. S. Webb, A. T. Astle, and P. V. McGraw, “Perceptual learning reduces crowding in amblyopia and in the normal periphery,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 474–480, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Klink, J. W. Brascamp, R. Blake, and R. van Wezel, “Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 16, pp. 1464–1469, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Lau, D. R. Ruggles, S. Katyal, S. A. Engel, and A. J. Oxenham, “Sustained cortical and subcortical measures of auditory and visual plasticity following short-term perceptual learning,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chen, P. Cai, T. Zhou, B. Thompson, and F. Fang, “Perceptual learning modifies the functional specializations of visual cortical areas,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 20, pp. 5724–5729, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maniglia and A. R. Seitz, “Towards a whole brain model of perceptual learning,” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 47–55, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lunghi, D. C. Burr, and C. Morrone, “Brief periods of monocular deprivation disrupt ocular balance in human adult visual cortex,” Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. R538–R539, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. F. Hess, J. Zhou, and S. Clavagnier, “Short-term monocular deprivation strengthens the patched eye’s contribution to binocular combination,” Journal of Vision, vol. 13, pp. 1–10, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Zhou, A. Reynaud, and R. F. Hess, “Real-time modulation of perceptual eye dominance in humans,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 281, no. 1795, article 20141717, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lunghi, M. Berchicci, M. C. Morrone, and F. Di Russo, “Short-term monocular deprivation alters early components of visual evoked potentials,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 593, no. 19, pp. 4361–4372, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, D. H. Baker, M. Simard, D. Saint-Amour, and R. F. Hess, “Short-term monocular patching boosts the patched eye’s response in visual cortex,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 381–387, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Binda, J. W. Kurzawski, C. Lunghi, L. Biagi, M. Tosetti, and M. C. Morrone, “Response to short-term deprivation of the human adult visual cortex measured with 7T bold,” eLife, vol. 7, pp. 1–25, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Chadnova, A. Reynaud, S. Clavagnier, and R. F. Hess, “Short-term monocular occlusion produces changes in ocular dominance by a reciprocal modulation of interocular inhibition,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2–7, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lunghi, U. E. Emir, M. C. Morrone et al., “Short-term monocular deprivation alters GABA in the adult human visual cortex,” Current Biology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1496–1501, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Holzschneider, T. Wolbers, B. Röder, and K. Hötting, “Cardiovascular fitness modulates brain activation associated with spatial learning,” NeuroImage, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 3003–3014, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Perini, M. Bortoletto, M. Capogrosso, A. Fertonani, and C. Miniussi, “Acute effects of aerobic exercise promote learning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Baldwin, A. E. Finn, H. M. Green, N. Gant, and R. F. Hess, Exercise does not enhance short-term deprivation-induced ocular dominance plasticity: evidence from dichoptic surround suppression, bioRxiv, 2020.
A. V. Benjamin, K. Wailes-Newson, A. Ma-Wyatt, D. H. Baker, and A. R. Wade, “The effect of locomotion on early visual contrast processing in humans,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3050–3059, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Campana, L. Fongoni, A. Astle, and P. V. McGraw, “Does physical exercise and congruent visual stimulation enhance perceptual learning?” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 40, pp. 680–691, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. E. Finn, A. S. Baldwin, A. Reynaud, and R. F. Hess, “Visual plasticity and exercise revisited: No evidence for a “cycling lane”,” Journal of Vision, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 10–21, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. W. W. Connell, B. Thompson, H. Green, R. K. Sullivan, and N. Gant, “Effects of regular aerobic exercise on visual perceptual learning,” Vision Research, vol. 152, pp. 110–117, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Erickson, D. L. Miller, A. M. Weinstein, S. L. Akl, and S. Banducci, “Physical activity and brain plasticity in late adulthood: a conceptual and comprehensive review,” Ageing Research, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 6, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Vivar, M. C. Potter, and H. van Praag, “All about running: synaptic plasticity, growth factors and adult hippocampal neurogenesis,” Behavior Analysis and Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 15, pp. 289–320, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Fierro, F. Brighina, G. Vitello et al., “Modulatory effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 565, no. 2, pp. 659–665, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Lou, K. H. Madsen, O. B. Paulson et al., “Monocular visual deprivation suppresses excitability in adult human visual cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 2876–2882, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bullock, J. C. Elliot, J. T. Serences, and B. Giesbrecht, “Acute exercise modulates feature-selective responses in human cortex,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 605–618, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Hawkins, A. F. Kramer, and D. Capaldi, “Aging, exercise, and attention,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 643–653, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Raz, U. Lindenberger, K. M. Rodrigue et al., “Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1676–1689, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Colcombe, K. I. Erickson, N. Raz et al., “Aerobic fitness reduces brain tissue loss in aging humans,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 176–180, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Colcombe, K. I. Erickson, P. E. Scalf et al., “Aerobic exercise training increases brain volume in aging humans,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1166–1170, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. I. Erickson and A. F. Kramer, “Aerobic exercise effects on cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 22–24, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lunghi, A. T. Sframeli, A. Lepri et al., “A new counterintuitive training for adult amblyopia,” Annals of Clinical Translational Neurology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 274–284, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Andrews, D. Curtin, Z. Hawi, J. Wongtrakun, J. C. Stout, and J. P. Coxon, “Intensity matters: high-intensity interval exercise enhances motor cortex plasticity more than moderate exercise,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kaneko, Y. Fu, and M. P. Stryker, “Locomotion induces stimulus-specific response enhancement in adult visual cortex,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 3532–3543, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Castrillon, N. Sollmann, K. Kurcyus, A. Razi, S. M. Krieg, and V. Riedl, “The physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation fundamentally differ across the human cortex,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 5, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Dania Abuleil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

634

Downloads

592

Citations