|
Report (number of cases and grades) | Antibody used | Immunostaining percentage | Correlations with clinicopathological features | Other correlations | Survival analysis |
|
Korkolopoulou et al. [30] (111 patients: 25 grade II, 15 III, and 71 IV) | Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-p70S6K (Thr421/Ser424) ab (specific for p70 subunit) (SCB), diluted 1 : 250 for IHC and 1 : 200 for WB | 99.1% (99/111) showed nuclear staining | No significant correlation | p-p70S6K with (i) cytoplasmic p-AKT (ii) p-mTOR (marginal) (iii) VEGF | No significant correlation |
Yang et al. [12] (96 patients: 16 grade II, 35 III, and 45 IV) | Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-S6 (Ser235/236) ab (CST), at a concentration of 0.125 Ig/mL (IHC) | 82.3% (79/96) cytoplasmic | p-S6 with (i) tumor grade (ii) lower KPS score | — | (i) p-S6 with worse prognosis (ii) Multivariate analysis: p-S6 as an independent prognostic factor |
Li et al. [14] (87 patients: 27 grade I-II, 24 III, and 36 IV) | Rabbit monoclonal anti-p-p70S6K (Thr389) ab (EP), diluted 1 : 50 (IHC) | (i) 72.4% (63/87) nuclear and/or cytoplasmic (ii) 41.7% of grade IV showed strong expression | p-p70S6K with tumor grade | — | — |
McBride et al. [35] (45 patients: 22 astrocytomas grade II) | (i) Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-S6 (Ser235/236) ab (SCT), diluted 1 : 200 (IHC) (ii) Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-S6 (Ser240/244) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 200 (IHC) | (i) p-S6 (Ser235/236): 76% (29/38) (ii) p-S6 (Ser240/244): 76% (29/38) | — | p-S6 (Ser235/236) with (i) p-PRAS40 (ii) p-S6 (Ser240/244) p-S6 (Ser240/244) with (iii) PTEN methylation (iv) inversely PTEN expression | (i) p-S6 (Ser235/236) with OS (ii) p-S6 (Ser240/244) with OS |
Annovazzi et al. [18] (54 patients: 10 grade II, 10 III, and 34 IV) | Rabbit polyclonal anti-p-S6 (Ser240/244) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 100 for IHC. Not provided for WB | (i) 0%, 30%, and 82.3% in grade II, III, and IV, respectively (ii) Nuclear in grade II and III but mainly cytoplasmic in grade IV | p-S6 with tumor grade | p-S6 IHC with (i) p-S6 WB (ii) Ki-67 (iii) inversely with Beclin 1 | No significant correlation |
Ermoian et al. [36] (71 patients: 28 grade II, 17 III, and 26 IV | Anti-p-S6 ab (CST) | Not provided | p-S6 unrelated to tumor grade | No significant correlation | No significant correlation |
Pelloski et al. [22] (268 grade IV) | Anti p-p70S6K ab (CST), diluted 1 : 1000 (WB) | Not provided | — | p-p70S6K with (i) p-ERK (ii) p-mTOR (iii) p-AKT (iv) PTEN (v) YKL-40 | (i) p-p70S6K with shorter OS (ii) Multivariate analysis: not retained as an independent prognostic factor |
Riemenschneider et al. [23] (29 grade IV) | (i) Mouse monoclonal anti-p-p70S6K (Thr389) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 200 (IHC) (ii)Rabbit monoclonal anti-p-S6 (Ser235/236) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 200 (IHC) | Not provided | — | (i) p-p70S6K with p-AKT (ii) p-S6 with p-AKT | — |
Ckakravarti et al. [25] (11 grade II, 13 III, and 56 IV) | Anti-p-p70S6K (Thr389) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 50 (WB) | 39.1% (36/92) of grade IV | p-p70S6K with tumor grade | p-p70S6K with (i) p-PI3K (ii) p-AKT (iii) inversely cCas3 | p-p70S6K with (i) adverse outcome (ii) reduced time to death Multivariate analysis: p-p70S6K as an independent prognostic factor |
Choe et al. [26] (45 grade IV) | Anti p-S6 (Ser235/236) ab (CST), diluted 1 : 50 (IHC) | Not provided | — | p- S6 with (i) EGFRwt (ii) EGFRvIII (iii) p-mTOR (iv) p-ERK | — |
|