Neurology Research International

Neurology Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 2351638 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2351638

Impaired Recent Verbal Memory in Pornography-Addicted Juvenile Subjects

Academic Editor: Changiz Geula
Received30 Nov 2018
Accepted21 May 2019
Published18 Aug 2019

Abstract

We aimed to find the differences in memory capabilities between pornography-addicted and nonaddicted juveniles. We enrolled 30 juveniles (12–16 y) consisting of 15 pornography addiction and 15 nonaddiction subjects. We used Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) to measure verbal memory, Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) for visual memory, along with Trail Making Test A and B (TMT-A and TMT-B) for attention. We found a significant reduction in the RAVLT A6 result of the addiction group (nonaddiction vs addiction: 13.47 ± 2.00 vs 11.67 ± 2.44, MD = −1.80, ), but not in ROCFT or attention tests. Analysis in sex subgroups yielded no sex-specific difference. We concluded that pornography addiction may be associated with impaired recent verbal memory in juveniles, regardless of sex and without association to attention.

1. Introduction

Substance addiction has since long been known to cause various cognitive and behavioral disorders, due to its direct effect on brain circuitry especially in the prefrontal cortex [1]. However, it has been proposed that behavioral addictions may also cause similar effects on the brain [2]. Among them, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder Fifth Edition (DSM-5) by American Psychiatric Association in 2013 has recognized gambling disorder as official diagnosis and considered Internet gaming disorder for further study [2, 3]. However, pornography addiction was deemed as lacking research and remained unmentioned.

Trend in pornography becomes more prevalent among juveniles in this modern time as they are exposed to technology and Internet. Yayasan Kita Dan Buah Hati found that almost 97% of fourth to sixth-grade primary school students in Jakarta and its surrounding area have been exposed to pornographic contents from various forms of media [4]. This may significantly affect their social behavior, especially to sexual-related activity, potentially change the structure and activity of their brains, and may result in Internet pornography addiction. This, in turn, was associated with impaired cognitive functions, i.e., attention, working memory, and cognitive control [2], as were other behavioral addictions (e.g., pathological gambling [5, 6] and Internet addiction [710]), as was substance addiction itself [5, 1115].

To the best of our knowledge, all previous studies regarding pornography addiction were performed on adult subjects. However, we believe it is also necessary to study the relationship between pornography addiction and cognitive function on those who are most vulnerable to it: juveniles, since it is the age group of brain maturation and is most vulnerable to addiction [16, 17]. This study aimed to appraise the differences in memory capabilities between pornography-addicted and nonaddicted juveniles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 30 juvenile subjects (aged 12–16 y) were screened using Pornography Addiction Test developed by Yayasan Kita Dan Buah Hati (explained below) to allocate them into pornography addiction group () and nonaddiction group (). Pornography addiction is defined as test score equal or greater than 32. Enrollment was done during December 2017–February 2018, in various events held by YKBH in Bekasi, Indonesia. Exclusion criteria were left-handed, verbal or language disorder, history of brain-related disorder or disease, head trauma, trauma during pregnancy or birth, developmental, psychological, or neurological disorder, or mental illness.

2.2. Pornography Addiction Screening

To determine pornography addiction, we used a self-reported questionnaire developed by expert psychologists. Based on field studies and literature researches, we found several indicators commonly found in juveniles with high pornography consumption. The indicators can be grouped into three dimensions: (1) time spent to use pornography, defined as number of times, frequency, and duration spent to use pornography in the last six months; (2) motivation to use pornography, defined as factors encouraging access to pornography, such as sexual curiosity, emotional avoidance, sensation seeking, and sexual pleasure; and (3) problematic pornography use, defined as distress and functional problems, excessive use, control difficulties, and use of pornography to escape/avoid negative emotions. The questionnaire consisted of 92 items and has been tested on 740 students of grade six to ten in Indonesia, detailed in an unpublished report. To minimalize possibility of faking good, there were 3 additional questions; subjects who answered these according to social desire will be excluded. Psychometric analysis showed that all items are valid (CFA > 1.96) and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7). Pornography addiction was defined as weighted score of greater than or equal to 32.

The questionnaire was specially developed and adapted to juvenile population in the context of pornography; therefore, it was very suitable for this study. Additionally, it had a fail-safe mechanism from subjects who faked good, and most questions used forced choice technique which allows for less bias.

Limitation of this questionnaire included its number of questions, which may induce fatigue and boredom on the subjects. Additionally, its use in other context outside of juvenile pornography addiction may require wording adjustments, as knowledge of pornography-related vocabularies was crucial in understanding and responding to the questions.

2.3. Memory Assessments

To assess the participants’ memory functions, we used the A6 and A7 scores of Ray Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) for auditory-verbal memory, along with recall/delayed score of Ray–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (ROCFT) for visual memory. Additionally, as attention has been widely recognized an important factor in working memory [18, 19], we also evaluated Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B. All tests were performed using standard procedures described in respective articles [2023].

2.4. Ethical Approval

We did not expose our subjects to any form of pornography in all tests. The study was approved by Health Research Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia (Clearance No. 1155/UN2.F1/ETIK/2017).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The Mann–Whitney test was used for comparison between addiction and nonaddiction groups. We also compared memory assessment results between sex subgroups in each group. Statistical significance was assumed on . All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® version 22 on Windows 7.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

We enrolled 30 subjects (nonaddiction group vs addiction group: mean age = 13.27 ± 1.03 vs 13.80 ± 1.26 y) (Table 1). Both groups were age-matched ().


Nonaddiction ()Addiction ()MD

Sex (female : male)7 : 85 : 10
Age13.27 ± 1.0313.80 ± 1.260.530.23
RAVLT A16.87 ± 2.776.87 ± 2.200.000.82
RAVLT A29.33 ± 2.539.13 ± 2.77−0.200.93
RAVLT A311.47 ± 3.4012.00 ± 2.650.530.83
RAVLT A413.07 ± 1.9413.20 ± 2.240.130.70
RAVLT A513.27 ± 2.2514.27 ± 1.161.000.26
RAVLT B17.73 ± 2.917.47 ± 2.53−0.260.95
RAVLT A613.47 ± 2.0011.67 ± 2.44−1.800.04
RAVLT A713.67 ± 1.7612.07 ± 2.63−1.600.08
ROCFT recall24.10 ± 4.7923.23 ± 6.57−0.870.88
TMT-A (second)40.20 ± 13.1344.67 ± 14.494.470.40
TMT-B (second)93.27 ± 30.8991.60 ± 53.48−1.670.58

Statistically significant (). All values are in mean ± SD, except stated. MD = mean difference (addiction − nonaddiction); RAVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ROCFT = Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test.
3.2. Memory Assessment Results

There was significant difference between addiction and nonaddiction groups in RAVLT A6 (MD = −1.80, ), along with tendency, but not statistically significant, of difference in A7 (MD = −1.60, ) (Table 1, Figure 1). Further comparison in sex subgroups did not show sex-specific difference, apart from the tendency in RAVLT A7 on male subjects (MD = −2.30, ). There was no significant difference in ROCFT, TMT-A, and TMT-B test results.

4. Discussion

We found lower RAVLT A6 score in the pornography addiction group when compared to the nonaddiction group, by 1.80 point of mean difference (13.36% of nonaddiction score). As A6 signifies recent memory capability after disruption (in B1), our results showed diminishing memory capability on pornography addiction. Working memory is known to have an important role in maintaining goal-oriented behavior [24, 25]; therefore, our findings suggested that pornography-addicted juveniles may have problem to do so.

As this study was the first to specifically learn about memory function in pornography addiction, especially in juveniles, we were unable to directly compare with previous study. Therefore, we will attempt to discuss the results indirectly with other related studies, mainly Internet addiction, as both are behavioral-based addictions and the fact that many Internet addictions stem from using Internet to find pornographic materials [26].

An EEG study by Yu et al. on Internet addiction subjects found significantly decreased amplitude along with increased/delayed latency in P300 amplitudes when compared to nonaddiction subjects, suggesting reduced memory capability [9]. P300 is a positive peaking wave in EEG occurring at ±300 ms after a stimulus resolves a degree of uncertainty [27], which is proposed to be associated with memory and attention [28, 29]. Consistent with Yu et al.’s study, various other studies found similar results on substance addiction [28, 29], such as alcohol [30], cannabis [31], cocaine [32, 33], and opioid/heroin [3335]. Additionally, P300 abnormality is also associated with antisocial personality disorder and impulsive behavior [30, 36].

Previous studies found lower working memory in substance addiction [5, 15, 3739], but not pathological gambling [5, 15]. Nie et al. studied the performance of Internet addicts on verbal working memory when faced with related Internet materials; the study found that the subjects’ memory function in 2-back task was slightly worse than normal control, but surprisingly, they performed better on internet-related material compared to internet-unrelated material [10]. Laier et al. specifically used pornographic contents and found significantly impaired visual working memory in pictorial 4-back task [40], although this study did not specifically evaluate addiction. Since RAVLT, which we used, measures verbal memory, similar to what was evaluated in Nie et al.’s study, our results were better compared to this study and similarly found reduction in memory capability.

Further analysis (based on sex subgroups) showed no sex-specific difference between female and male subgroups. Although it has been traditionally known that pornography affects males more than females [2, 41, 42], here we presented sex equality on association of pornography addiction with impaired memory capability. Therefore, problems with pornography addiction are not exclusive to males and that females should also be screened and treated for pornography addiction.

Despite attention being a confounding factor for memory performance [18, 19], we found that there was no significant difference in attention test results between both groups, suggesting that the impaired memory in pornography addiction was not related to attention problem. Further studies are warranted to understand the cause of this impairment.

Limitation of this study, which was also its strength, was our enrollment of juvenile subjects. Despite our aim to pioneer pornography addiction study in its earliest and most critical phase, juvenile brains are still growing and developing [43] and thus might compensate underlying brain impairment [44]. Furthermore, although it is a common approach to use related materials in order to gain better results, it was unfortunately unfavorable in our study as showing pornography to juveniles is considered unethical. Secondly, our study, being a cross-sectional design, was unable to find the cause-and-effect relationship between lower memory capability and pornography addiction. Another thing to consider is that we did not correct our results for multiple comparisons, as our study had only 3 actual variables to compare: auditory immediate memory (represented by RAVLT A6), auditory delayed memory (A7), and visual delayed memory (ROCFT delayed), which we considered as too few to cause a multiple-comparison false-discovery error. Other information in our results were all accompanying data displayed for completion purpose: RAVLT A1–5 were results of process toward A6 and A7, while TMT A and B were to rule out attention disorder.

Further neurocognitive studies regarding pornography effects on memory, attention, and other aspects of cognition, especially on longitudinal and functional imaging designs, are required to confirm the cause and extent of impairment.

5. Conclusions

Pornography addiction may be associated with impaired recent verbal memory in juveniles, regardless of sex and without association to attention.

Data Availability

The memory performance measurement score data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Disclosure

An earlier version of this work has been presented as abstract and poster at The 3rd International Conference and Exhibition on Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (ICE on IMERI), 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Pukovisa Prawiroharjo and Hainah Ellydar contributed equally to this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection (government-sponsored). The authors would like to thank Alexandra Chessa, Kevin Widjaja, and Nia Soewardi for their contributions in this paper.

Supplementary Materials

Comparison of memory and attention test scores between nonaddiction and addiction groups, subgrouped by sex. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. R. Z. Goldstein and N. D. Volkow, “Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 652–669, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Love, C. Laier, M. Brand, L. Hatch, and R. Hajela, “Neuroscience of Internet pornography addiction: a review and update,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 388–433, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC, USA, 5th edition, 2013.
  4. Yayasan Kita Dan Buah Hati, Data on Indonesian Children’s Exposure to Pornography, Yayasan Kita Dan Buah Hati, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016.
  5. N. Albein-Urios, J. M. Martinez-González, Ó. Lozano, L. Clark, and A. Verdejo-García, “Comparison of impulsivity and working memory in cocaine addiction and pathological gambling: implications for cocaine-induced neurotoxicity,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 126, no. 1-2, pp. 1–6, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Moccia, M. Pettorruso, F. De Crescenzo et al., “Neural correlates of cognitive control in gambling disorder: a systematic review of fMRI studies,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 78, pp. 104–116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Dong, H. Zhou, and X. Zhao, “Male Internet addicts show impaired executive control ability: evidence from a color-word Stroop task,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 499, no. 2, pp. 114–118, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Dong, E. E. DeVito, X. Du, and Z. Cui, “Impaired inhibitory control in ‘Internet addiction disorder’: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study,” Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, vol. 203, no. 2-3, pp. 153–158, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Yu, X. Zhao, N. Li, M. Wang, and P. Zhou, “Effect of excessive Internet use on the time–frequency characteristic of EEG,” Progress in Natural Science, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1383–1387, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Nie, W. Zhang, J. Chen, and W. Li, “Impaired inhibition and working memory in response to Internet-related words among adolescents with internet addiction: a comparison with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 236, pp. 28–34, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. W. Kalivas and N. D. Volkow, “The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 162, no. 8, pp. 1403–1413, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Spiga, A. Lintas, and M. Diana, “Addiction and cognitive functions,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1139, no. 1, pp. 299–306, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Fattore and M. Diana, “Drug addiction: an affective-cognitive disorder in need of a cure,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 65, pp. 341–361, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A.-P. Le Berre, R. Fama, and E. V. Sullivan, “Executive functions, memory, and social cognitive deficits and recovery in chronic alcoholism: a critical review to inform future research,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1432–1443, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W.-S. Yan, Y.-H. Li, L. Xiao, N. Zhu, A. Bechara, and N. Sui, “Working memory and affective decision-making in addiction: a neurocognitive comparison between heroin addicts, pathological gamblers and healthy controls,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 134, pp. 194–200, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. P. Spear, “The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 417–463, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Steinberg, “Cognitive and affective development in adolescence,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. Unsworth, K. Fukuda, E. Awh, and E. K. Vogel, “Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 71, pp. 1–26, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. Cowan, “The magical mystery four: how is working memory capacity limited, and why?” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Strauss, E. M. S. Sherman, and O. Spreen, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, Third edition, 2006.
  21. P. A. Osterrieth, The Test of Copying a Complex Figure: a Contribution to the Study of Perception and Memory, vol. 30, American Psychiatric Association, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1944.
  22. A. Rey, The Clinical Examination in Psychology, Presse Universitaires de France, Paris, France, 1964.
  23. US Army Individual Test Battery, Manual of Directions and Scoring, War Department, Adjunct General’s Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1944.
  24. J. Schiebener, C. Laier, and M. Brand, “Getting stuck with pornography? Overuse or neglect of cybersex cues in a multitasking situation is related to symptoms of cybersex addiction,” Journal of Behavioral Addictions, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. d. Boisgueheneuc, R. Levy, E. Volle et al., “Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study,” Brain, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 3315–3328, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G.-J. Meerkerk, R. J. J. M. V. D. Eijnden, and H. F. L. Garretsen, “Predicting compulsive internet use: it’s all about sex!,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 95–103, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Sutton, P. Tueting, J. Zubin, and E. R. John, “Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential,” Science, vol. 155, no. 3768, pp. 1436–1439, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Polich, “Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 2128–2148, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Campanella, O. Pogarell, and N. Boutros, “Event-related potentials in substance use disorders,” Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 67–76, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Costa, L. Bauer, S. Kuperman et al., “Frontal P300 decrements, alcohol dependence, and antisocial personality disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1064–1071, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. L. Theunissen, G. F. Kauert, S. W. Toennes et al., “Neurophysiological functioning of occasional and heavy cannabis users during THC intoxication,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 341–350, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. Sokhadze, C. Stewart, M. Hollifield, and A. Tasman, “Event-related potential study of executive dysfunctions in a speeded reaction task in cocaine addiction,” Journal of Neurotherapy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 185–204, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. O. Bauer, “CNS recovery from cocaine, cocaine and alcohol, or opioid dependence: a P300 study,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 112, no. 8, pp. 1508–1515, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Yang, S. Yang, L. Zhao, L. Yin, X. Liu, and S. An, “Event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task of abnormal response inhibition in heroin addicts,” Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 780–788, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. C. Papageorgiou, I. A. Liappas, E. M. Ventouras et al., “Long-term abstinence syndrome in heroin addicts: indices of P300 alterations associated with a short memory task,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1109–1115, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. N. Justus, P. R. Finn, and J. E. Steinmetz, “P300, disinhibited personality, and early-onset alcohol problems,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1457–1466, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. J. Morgan, “Memory deficits associated with recreational use of “ecstasy” (MDMA),” Psychopharmacology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Bechara and E. M. Martin, “Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions,” Neuropsychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 152–162, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. O. George, C. D. Mandyam, S. Wee, and G. F. Koob, “Extended access to cocaine self-administration produces long-lasting prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory impairments,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2474–2482, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Laier, F. P. Schulte, and M. Brand, “Pornographic picture processing interferes with working memory performance,” Journal of Sex Research, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 642–652, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. W. Aviv, R. Zolek, A. Babkin, K. Cohen, and M. Lejoyeux, “Factors predicting cybersex use and difficulties in forming intimate relationships among male and female users of cybersex,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 6, pp. 1–8, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Peter and P. M. Valkenburg, “Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet,” Communication Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 178–204, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. J. Casey, R. M. Jones, and T. A. Hare, “The adolescent brain,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1124, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Y. Ismail, A. Fatemi, and M. V. Johnston, “Cerebral plasticity: windows of opportunity in the developing brain,” European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 23–48, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Pukovisa Prawiroharjo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2704 Views | 531 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.