Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Nursing Research and Practice
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 192782, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/192782
Review Article

The Conceptualization and Measurement of Comorbidity: A Review of the Interprofessional Discourse

1Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions & Health, University of Pennsylvania, Room 337 Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4217, USA
2NewCourtland Center for Transitions & Health, University of Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
3New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA
4Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, School of Nursing, 90040-060 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
5School of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, SA 5001, Australia
6NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19109-4217, USA

Received 8 July 2013; Accepted 16 August 2013

Academic Editor: Linda Moneyham

Copyright © 2013 Salimah H. Meghani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. R. Feinstein, “The pre-therapeutic classification of comorbidity in chronic disease,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 455–468, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. E. Meehl, “Comorbidity and taxometrics,” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 507–519, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. K. Parekh and M. B. Barton, “The challenge of multiple comorbidity for the us health care system,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 303, no. 13, pp. 1303–1304, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Starfield, “Threads and yarns: weaving the tapestry of comorbidity,” Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–103, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. A. Holroyd, “Disentangling the gordion knot of migraine comorbidity,” Headache, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 876–877, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. A. Piotrowski, “Comorbidity and psychological science: does one size fit all?” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–19, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. M. Boyd, C. O. Weiss, J. Halter, K. C. Han, W. B. Ershler, and L. P. Fried, “Framework for evaluating disease severity measures in older adults with comorbidity,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 286–295, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. L. Lash, V. Mor, D. Wieland, L. Ferrucci, W. Satariano, and R. A. Silliman, “Methodology, design, and analytic techniques to address measurement of comorbid disease,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Yancik, W. Ershler, W. Satariano, W. Hazzard, H. J. Cohen, and L. Ferrucci, “Report of the national institute on aging task force on comorbidity,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 275–280, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. E. Tinetti, T. R. Fried, and C. M. Boyd, “Designing health care for the most common chronic condition-multimorbidity,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 307, no. 23, pp. 2493–2494, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. “Multiple chronic conditions measurement framework,” http://www.qualityforum.org/Search.aspx?keyword=Multiple+chronic+conditions+%28MCC%29+measurement+framework.
  12. M. Maj, “‘Psychiatric comorbidity’: an artefact of current diagnostic systems?” The British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 186, pp. 182–184, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Maj, “The aftermath of the concept of ‘psychiatric comorbidity’,” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 67–68, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Gijsen, N. Hoeymans, F. G. Schellevis, D. Ruwaard, W. A. Satariano, and G. A. M. van den Bos, “Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 661–674, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. P. Bogenschutz and H. G. Nurnberg, “Theoretical and methodological issues in psychiatric comorbidity,” Harvard Review of Psychiatry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. J. Russell, “Subgroups defined by comorbidity?” Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. V. R. Vieweg, M. Hasnain, E. J. Lesnefsky, E. E. Turf, and A. K. Pandurangi, “Assessing the presence and severity of depression in subjects with comorbid coronary heart disease,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 683–690, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases (ICD), WHO, 2010, http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/.
  19. K. T. Mueser and R. E. Drake, “Comorbidity: what have we learned and where are we going?” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. E. Drake and M. A. Wallach, “Is comorbidity a psychological science?” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 20–22, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Muehrer, “Research on co-morbidity, contextual barriers, and stigma: an introduction to the special issue,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 843–845, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. van Weel and F. G. Schellevis, “Comorbidity and guidelines: conflicting interests,” The Lancet, vol. 367, no. 9510, pp. 550–551, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Roth, “Challenges in the comorbid condition,” Sleep Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. S1–S2, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Roth, “Conclusion: challenges in the comorbid condition,” Sleep Medicine, vol. 8, supplement 4, p. S35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. P. Fried, L. Ferrucci, J. Darer, J. D. Williamson, and G. Anderson, “Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Institute NHGR, A Brief Guide to Genomics, Health NHGRINNIo, 2012.
  27. S. B. Baylin, “Epigenetics and Cancer,” edited by J. Mendelsohn, P. M. Howley, M. A. Israel, J. W. Gray and C. B. Thompson, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  28. Y. Watanabe and M. Maekawa, “Methylation of DNA in cancer,” Advances in Clinical Chemistry, vol. 52, pp. 145–167, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  29. H. G. Buck, S. Meghani, J. P. Bettger et al., “The use of comorbidities among adults experiencing care transitions: a systematic review and evolutionary analysis of empirical literature,” Chronic Illness, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 279–295, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. C. Baird, “Improving outcomes for women with co-morbid conditions: look to the evidence,” Journal of Addictions Nursing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 45–47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Firat, E. Gore, and R. W. Byhardt, “Do “elderly fit” patients have less comorbidity?” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1166–1168, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. M. Valderas, B. Starfield, B. Sibbald, C. Salisbury, and M. Roland, “Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services,” Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 357–363, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. H. Kaplan and A. R. Feinstein, “The importance of classifying initial comorbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 27, no. 7-8, pp. 387–404, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, G. J. Lankhorst, and L. M. Bouter, “How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K. A. Ales, and C. R. MacKenzie, “A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 373–383, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. A. Deyo, D. C. Cherkin, and M. A. Ciol, “Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 613–619, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. W. D'Hoore, A. Bouckaert, and C. Tilquin, “Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1429–1433, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Elixhauser, C. Steiner, D. R. Harris, and R. M. Coffey, “Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data,” Medical Care, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 8–27, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Fawcett, “Occam's razor, comorbidity, and the new millennium,” Psychiatric Annals, vol. 30, no. 1, article 7, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. Fawcett, “The role of comorbidity in severity and outcome,” Psychiatric Annals, vol. 38, no. 11, article 702, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. S. McIntyre, “Introduction: balancing the equation: managing comorbidities in patients with severe mental Illness,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 3, article 4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. R. Feinstein, “T. Duckett Jones memorial lecture. The Jones criteria and the challenges of clinimetrics,” Circulation, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus