Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction and Anticipated Turnover among Nurses in Sidama Zone Public Health Facilities, South Ethiopia
Table 4
Frequency and percentage distribution of responses on work environment and group cohesion subscale, Sidama zone public health facilities, May-June 2010.
Question and subscale
Satisfied (%)
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (%)
Dissatisfied (%)
Work environment and cohesion
(1) By the level of the working environment allowing you to make autonomous nursing care decision
109 (45)
46 (19.0)
87 (36.0)
(2) By the level of the working environment allowing you to be fully accountable for those decision
112 (46.3)
51 (21.1)
79 (32.6)
(3) By the level of the working environment to encourage you to make adjustment in your nursing practice to suit patient needs
117 (48.3)
48 (19.8)
77 (31.8)
(4) By the level of the working environment to provide a stimulating intellectual environment
86 (35.5)
52 (21.5)
104 (43.0)
(5) By the level of the working environment to provide you with high level of clinical competence on your unit
108 (44.6)
44 (18.2)
90 (37.2)
(6) By the level of the working environment allowing opportunity to expand your scope of practice
105 (43.4)
40 (16.5)
97 (40.1)
(7) By the level of relationship among staff in your department
147 (60.7)
45 (18.6)
50 (20.7)
(8) By the level of group members positively influencing one another
135 (55.8)
47 (19.4)
60 (24.8)
(9) By the level of relationship with physician at your unit
