Obstetrics and Gynecology International

Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2010 / Article
Special Issue

Hysterectomy—Current Methods and Alternatives

View this Special Issue

Editorial | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 705073 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/705073

Liselotte Mettler, Harry Reich, Limin Feng, Shailesh Puntambekar, Adolf Gallinat, Michael Stark, "Hysterectomy: Current Methods and Alternatives", Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2010, Article ID 705073, 1 page, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/705073

Hysterectomy: Current Methods and Alternatives

Received31 Dec 2010
Accepted31 Dec 2010
Published09 Jun 2011

Hysterectomies performed in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology until the 19th century always had a lethal end. In the 20th century they were performed quite successful concerning survival but perhaps too frequently, whereas the 21st century has witnessed a steep decline in hysterectomy numbers. It is, therefore, an opportune time to review the indications for hysterectomies and hysterectomy techniques as well as the present and future status of this surgical procedure.

There is a widespread consensus that hysterectomies are primarily to be performed in cancer cases and obstetrical chaos situations even though minimal invasive surgical (MIS) technologies have made the procedure more patient friendly than the classical abdominal opening. Today, minimally invasive hysterectomies are performed as frequently as vaginal hysterectomies, and the vaginal approach is still the first choice if the correct indications are given. It is rarely necessary to open the abdomen; this procedure has been replaced by laparoscopic surgery with multiple- and single-port entries. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery can also be indicated for hysterectomies in selected patients with gynaecological cancers.

For women of reproductive age, laparoscopic myomectomies and numerous other uterine-preserving techniques are applied in a first treatment step of meno-metrorrhagia, uterine adenomyosis, and submucous myoma. These interventions are only followed by a hysterectomy if the pathology prevails.

We have selected six papers to reflect the present status of hysterectomies and alternate techniques preserving the uterus. In the time of organ preserving minimal invasive surgery in splendid cooperation with imaging technologies and early recognition of the disease, the number of hysterectomies definitely decreases and will hopefully one day be only used in cases of malignancy. Even malignancy treatment, of course, totally depends on early recognition and possibly can also be treated by different modalities than resection in the future.

Liselotte Mettler
Harry Reich
Limin Feng
Shailesh Puntambekar
Adolf Gallinat
Michael Stark

Copyright © 2010 Liselotte Mettler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.