Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 847370, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/847370
Case Report

Gonadal Dysgenesis 46, XX Associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome: One Case Report

1Department of Gynecology Obstetric I, Teaching Hospital Hassan II, Fez 30000, Morocco
2Department of Medical Genetic and Oncogenetic, Teaching Hospital Hassan II, Fez 30000, Morocco

Received 26 September 2010; Accepted 19 December 2010

Academic Editor: J. L. Simpson

Copyright © 2010 N. Bousfiha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Aydos, A. Tükün, and I. Bökesoy, “Gonadal dysgenesis and the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome in a girl with 46,X,del(X)(pter→q22:),” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 173–174, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. J. J. Gorgojo, F. Almodóvar, E. López, and S. Donnay, “Gonadal agenesis 46,XX associated with the atypical form of Rokitansky syndrome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 185–187, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. C. Ting and S. P. Chang, “Coexistence of gonadal dysgenesis and Mullerian agenesis with two mosaic cell lines 45,X/46,X,del(X)(p22.2),” Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 450–452, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. S. Azoury and H. W. Jones, “Cytogenetic findings in patients with congenital absence of the vagina,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 178–180, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Morcel, D. Guerrier, T. Watrin, I. Pellerin, and J. Levêque, “The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: clinical description and genetics,” Journal de Gynecologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 539–546, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. A. Marrakchi, M. H. Gharbi, and A. Kadiri, “Gonadal dysgenesis associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report,” Annales d'Endocrinologie, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 466–468, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Kdous, M. Ferchiou, M. Boubaker, A. Chaker, and S. Meriah, “Gonadal agenesis 46,XX associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Haüser syndrome. A rare association,” La Tunisie Médicale, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 1101–1102, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Plevraki, M. Kita, D. G. Goulis, H. Hatzisevastou-Loukidou, A. F. Lambropoulos, and A. Avramides, “Bilateral ovarian agenesis and the presence of the testis-specific protein 1-Y-linked gene: two new features of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 689–692, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. A. Kumar, S. Mishra, and P. N. Dogra, “Management of an unusual case of atypical Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, with unilateral gonadal agenesis, solitary ectopic pelvic kidney, and pelviureteric junction obstruction,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 823–825, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. H. Kaya, M. Sezik, O. Özkaya, and S. A. Köse, “Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome associated with unilateral gonadal agenesis: a case report,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 902–904, 2003. View at Google Scholar