Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2010, Article ID 852647, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/852647
Research Article

Resident Education in Principles and Technique of Bowel Surgery Using an Ex-Vivo Porcine Model

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA
2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA
3Institute for Clinical Simulation and Patient Safety, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104 PA, USA

Received 11 August 2009; Accepted 11 January 2010

Academic Editor: William T. Creasman

Copyright © 2010 M. Bijoy Thomas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. A. Goff, “Changing the paradigm in surgical education,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 112, no. 2, part 1, pp. 328–332, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. B. A. Goff, “Surgical education: what role should gynecologic oncologists play?” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 164–165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. L. M. Sutherland, P. F. Middleton, A. Anthony et al., “Surgical simulation: a systematic review,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 291–300, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. D. J. Scott, P. C. Bergen, R. V. Rege et al., “Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 272–283, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. L. Coleman and C. Y. Muller, “Effects of a laboratory-based skills curriculum on laparoscopic proficiency: a randomized trial,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 836–842, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. H. Banks, S. Chudnoff, I. Karmin, C. Wang, and S. Pardanani, “Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative performance of laparoscopic tubal ligation?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 197, no. 5, pp. 541.e1–541.e5, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. E. D. Grober, S. J. Hamstra, K. R. Wanzel et al., “The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 240, no. 2, pp. 374–381, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. D. Matsumoto, S. J. Hamstra, S. B. Radomski, and M. D. Cusimano, “The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: a randomized controlled study,” Journal of Urology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1243–1247, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. J. Anastakis, G. Regehr, R. K. Reznick et al., “Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 167–170, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. K. Patterson, X. G. Lei, and D. D. Miller, “The pig as an experimental model for elucidating the mechanisms governing dietary influence on mineral absorption,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 233, no. 6, pp. 651–664, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. C. R. Macedonia, R. B. Gherman, and A. J. Satin, “Simulation laboratories for training in obstetrics and gynecology,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 388–392, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. M. Hammoud, F. S. Nuthalapaty, A. R. Goepfert et al., “To the point: medical education review of the role of simulators in surgical training,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 338–343, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. G. M. Lentz, L. S. Mandel, D. Lee, C. Gardella, J. Melville, and B. A. Goff, “Testing surgical skills of obstetric and gynecologic residents in a bench laboratory setting: validity and reliability,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1462–1470, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. S. Mandel, B. A. Goff, and G. M. Lentz, “Self-assessment of resident surgical skills: is it feasible?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 1817–1822, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. B. Goff, L. Mandel, G. Lentz et al., “Assessment of resident surgical skills: is testing feasible?” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 1331–1340, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. G. M. Lentz, L. S. Mandel, and B. A. Goff, “A six-year study of surgical teaching and skills evaluation for obstetric/gynecologic residents in porcine and inanimate surgical models,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 6, pp. 2056–2061, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus