Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 686253, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/686253
Review Article

The Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Impacted by Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Phipps 264 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

Received 21 July 2011; Accepted 25 November 2011

Academic Editor: B. S. Garg

Copyright © 2012 Paul R. Brezina and Yulian Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. W. Jones, “Moments in the life of Patrick Steptoe,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 15–16, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Ombelet, I. Cooke, S. Dyer, G. Serour, and P. Devroey, “Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 605–621, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. P. C. Steptoe and R. G. Edwards, “Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo,” The Lancet, vol. 2, no. 8085, p. 366, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. M. Chambers, E. A. Sullivan, O. Ishihara, M. G. Chapman, and G. D. Adamson, “The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2281–2294, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. H. W. Jones, I. Cooke, R. Kempers, P. Brinsden, and D. Saunders, “International federation of fertility societies surveillance,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 2, p. 491, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. L. A. Schieve, H. B. Peterson, S. F. Meikle et al., “Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, no. 19, pp. 1832–1838, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. American Fertility Society and Ethics Committee, “Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 46, no. 3, supplement 1, pp. 1S–94S, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  8. “Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA),” Pub. L. no.102 —493,1992.
  9. W. L. Ledger, D. Anumba, N. Marlow, C. M. Thomas, and E. C. Wilson, “The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. ASRM Practice Committee, “Guidelines on number of embryos transferred,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1518–1519, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. J. McLernon, K. Harrild, C. Bergh et al., “Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials,” BMJ, vol. 341, Article ID c6945, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. http://www.cdc.gov/art/.
  13. A. Massip, P. Mermillod, and A. Dinnyes, “Morphology and biochemistry of in-vitro produced bovine embryos: implications for their cryopreservation,” Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 3004–3011, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. H. Reindollar, M. M. Regan, P. J. Neumann et al., “A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 888–899, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. P. E. L. Setti, E. Albani, A. Cesana et al., “Italian constitutional court modifications of a restrictive assisted reproduction technology law significantly improve pregnancy rate,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 376–381, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. E. G. Hughes and D. DeJean, “Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. e16–e19, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. J. Collins and J. Cook, “Cross-border reproductive care: now and into the future,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. e25–e26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. A. P. Ferraretti, G. Pennings, L. Gianaroli, F. Natali, and M. C. Magli, “Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies,” Reproductive BioMedicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. T. Jain and M. D. Hornstein, “Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 221–223, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. K. R. Omurtag, A. K. Styer, D. Session, and T. L. Toth, “Economic implications of insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization in the United States: a review,” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 54, no. 11-12, pp. 661–668, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Garcia, “Profiling assisted reproductive technology: the society for assisted reproductive technology registry and the rising costs of assisted reproductive technology,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 624–626, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Mladovsky and C. Sorenson, “Public financing of IVF: a review of policy rationales,” Health Care Analysis, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 113–128, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. R. Klemetti, M. Gissler, and E. Hemminki, “Equity in the use of IVF in Finland in the late 1990s,” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 203–209, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. World Health Organization, “Infections, pregnancies, and infertility: perspectives on prevention,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 964–968, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. R. Sharp, M. L. McGowan, J. A. Verma et al., “Moral attitudes and beliefs among couples pursuing PGD for sex selection,” Reproductive BioMedicine, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 838–847, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. K. Ehrich, C. Williams, B. Farsides, J. Sandall, and R. Scott, “Choosing embryos: ethical complexity and relational autonomy in staff accounts of PGD,” Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1091–1106, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. I. A. van Rooij, L. F. Bancsi, F. J. Broekmans, C. W. Looman, J. D. Habbema, and E. R. Te Velde, “Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels differ in poor response rate and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 482–488, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. D. Spandorfer, K. Bendikson, K. Dragisic, G. Schattman, O. K. Davis, and Z. Rosenwaks, “Outcome of in vitro fertilization in women 45 years and older who use autologous oocytes,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 74–76, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. ASRM Ethics Committee Report, “Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1622–1628, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  30. E. Porcu, R. Fabbri, G. Damiano, R. Fratto, S. Giunchi, and S. Venturoli, “Oocyte cryopreservation in oncological patients,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 113, supplement 1, pp. S14–S16, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. N. Noyes, J. Boldt, and Z. P. Nagy, “Oocyte cryopreservation: is it time to remove its experimental label?” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 69–74, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. J. Donnez, J. Squifflet, P. Jadoul et al., “Pregnancy and live birth after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in a patient with metastatic disease undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1787.e1–1787.e4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. E. Ernst, S. Bergholdt, J. S. Jørgensen, and C. Y. Andersen, “The first woman to give birth to two children following transplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue,” Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1280–1281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. G. D. Rao, R. C. Chian, W. S. Son et al., “Fertility preservation in women undergoing cancer treatment,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9423, pp. 1829–1830, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Meirow, “Fertility preservation in cancer patients using stored ovarian tissue: clinical aspects,” Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 536–547, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. T. F. Murphy, “Ethics and the prohibition of donor gametes in fertility medicine,” Reproductive BioMedicine, vol. 18, supplement 1, pp. 60–67, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  37. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Interests, obligations, and rights of the donor in gamete donation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  38. E. D. Levens and A. H. DeCherney, “Human oocyte research: the ethics of donation and donor protection,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 300, no. 18, pp. 2174–2176, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  39. A. D. Levine, “The oversight and practice of oocyte donation in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada,” HEC Forum, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. J. L. Sauer, “Competing interests and gamete donation: the case for anonymity,” Seton Hall Law Review, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 919–954, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. Jadva, T. Freeman, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok, “Sperm and oocyte donors experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 638–645, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. D. W. Riggs and L. Russell, “Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 266–272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. J. A. Burr, “To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 801–806, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. M. S. Paul, R. Berger, E. Blyth, and L. Frith, “Relinquishing frozen embryos for conception by infertile couples,” Families, Systems and Health, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 258–273, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, “American society for reproductive medicine: defining embryo donation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1818–1819, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  46. K. Hug, “Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 263–277, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. T. Kalista, H. A. Freeman, B. Behr, R. R. Pera, and C. T. Scott, “Donation of embryos for human development and stem cell research,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 360–362, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  48. F. Baylis, “For love or money? The saga of Korean women who provided eggs for embryonic stem cell research,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 385–396, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. S. L. Crockin, “A legal defense for compensating research egg donors,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 99–102, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. S. James, R. Chilvers, D. Havemann, and J. Y. Phelps, “Avoiding legal pitfalls in surrogacy arrangements,” Reproductive BioMedicine, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 862–867, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. J. K. Hanna, “Revisiting child-based objections to commercial surrogacy,” Bioethics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 341–347, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. C. Humbyrd, “Fair trade international surrogacy,” Developing World Bioethics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 111–118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. N. Gamble, “Crossing the line: the legal and ethical problems of foreign surrogacy,” Reproductive BioMedicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 151–152, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Osberg, “For your first born child: an ethical defense of the exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy,” Penn Bioethics Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 42–45, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Damelio and K. Sorensen, “Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy,” Bioethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 269–277, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. K. Drabiak, C. Wegner, V. Fredland, and P. R. Helft, “Ethics, law, and commercial surrogacy: a call for uniformity,” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 300–309, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. U. B. Wennerholm, V. Söderström-Anttila, C. Bergh et al., “Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 2158–2172, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. H. Logerot-Lebrun, J. De Mouzon, A. Hachelot, and A. Spira, “Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French national registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990, FIVNAT (French In Vitro National),” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 746–756, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Petersen, P. J. Hornnes, S. Ellingsen et al., “Perinatal outcome after in vitro fertilisation,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 129–131, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  60. M. Ceelen, M. M. van Weissenbruch, J. P. W. Vermeiden, F. E. van Leeuwen, and H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal, “Growth and development of children born after in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1662–1673, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. E. L. Niemitz and A. P. Feinberg, “Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 599–609, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. L. N. Odom and J. Segars, “Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology,” Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 517–522, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. A. Fortunato and E. Tosti, “The impact of in vitro fertilization on health of the children: an update,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed