Obstetrics and Gynecology International

Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 921236 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/921236

Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for Their Children: A Systematic Review from 2001 to 2011

Academic Editor: Jitti Hanprasertpong
Received10 Jun 2011
Accepted30 Jul 2011
Published02 Oct 2011

Abstract

Objectives. A systematic review of parental surveys about HPV and/or child HPV vaccination to understand parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour before and after FDA approval of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine and the bivalent HPV vaccine. Search Strategy. Searches were conducted using electronic databases limited to published studies between 2001 and 2011. Findings. The percentage of parents who heard about HPV rose over time (from 60% in 2005 to 93% in 2009), as did their appreciation for the HPV infection and cervical cancer link (from 70% in 2003 to 91% in 2011). During the FDA approval, there was a stronger vaccine awareness but it has waned. The same pattern is seen with parents whose children received the HPV vaccine (peak at 84% in 2010 and now 36% in 2011) or the intention to vaccinate (peak at 80% in 2008 and now 41% in 2011). Conclusions. Parents had safety concerns and wanted more information their physician from to recommend and to confidently HPV vaccinate their children.

1. Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the world and is an established causative agent for cervical, anal, and penile cancers, as well as genital warts in both men and women [1, 2]. It is estimated that 75% of Canadians will experience an HPV infection at least once in their lifetime, with the highest rates of infection occurring in individuals under the age of 25 [3]. In June 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the quadrivalent vaccine for use in the prevention of HPV strains 6, 11, 16, and 18, which are associated with 70% of cervical cancer and 90% of genital warts cases [4, 5]. In October 2009, the bivalent HPV vaccine was approved by the FDA for the prevention of HPV strains 16 and 18 which are associated with 70% of cervical cancer cases [4, 6]. Unlike the quadrivalent vaccine, the bivalent HPV vaccine does not protect against strains of HPV that cause genital warts [6]. Both vaccines are administered in three doses over a period of six months.

As a result of the approval of the HPV vaccines, recent health policy discussions have introduced the idea of adjusting the age of initial PAP smears from 18 years old (or with sexual debut) to 21 or 22 years old (or with sexual debut) [7]. Additionally, a move away from PAP smears toward HPV viral testing for women over 30 with a concurrent decrease in the frequency of PAP smear testing from annually to every 3 to 5 years has been proposed [7]. These health policy shifts are rooted in the success of the HPV vaccines to guard against cervical cancer. This success is, necessarily, dependent on successful vaccine uptake.

Currently, policy is modelled on an 80% uptake by young women, which means when combined with vaccination, reducing the frequency of testing and increasing the age of initial PAP smear would be part of an efficient plan to reduce cervical cancer. However, actual uptake of the vaccines is relatively low and not consistent in all areas that the vaccine is offered. For example, in the province of Quebec where there is a passive consent strategy to school immunizations (i.e., parental consent must be explicitly withdrawn in a note to the school), there is an 80% vaccine uptake for grade-8 girls [8, 9]. However, in the province of Ontario, where the school-based immunization program has an active consent strategy (i.e., parental consent is explicitly given in a note to the school), the vaccine uptake rate for grade 8-girls is 50% [8, 9]. By comparison, the acceptance of the hepatitis B vaccine was accepted without difficulty yet both aim at preventing disease that is sexually acquired. The acceptance of the hepatitis B vaccine for grade-7 students in Ontario was 79.8% (range 65.2% to 95.2%) and in Quebec the acceptance for grade-8 students was between 85 and 95% [8, 9]. The hepatitis vaccine is offered to both boys and girls and is marketed to prevent liver disease and liver cancer, which is relatively rare in the developed world compared to cervical cancer. Suggested reasons for a low vaccine uptake rate range from low knowledge levels regarding HPV and the HPV vaccine, to cost, to a perceived low efficacy of the vaccine. Recent literature has examined these possible factors as they relate to adolescent attitudes towards HPV vaccination [7]. However, given that the vaccines are targeted towards males and females in the 9- to 26-age group, with emphasis placed on ages 11 and 12 in order to promote inoculation prior to sexual debut [10], a key factor in the implementation of HPV vaccines is the extent to which parents accept HPV vaccination for their children. In order to fully understand the issues surrounding HPV vaccine uptake, parental attitudes towards the vaccine must be examined.

2. Objectives

The purpose of this systematic paper is to compare the findings of previous studies that have examined parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours towards the HPV vaccine. Particular emphasis will be placed on changes within parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour following the availability of the HPV vaccines. Beyond identifying trends in uptake, the paper will also focus on factors that affect parental intentions to vaccinate their children against HPV. Based on previous studies regarding vaccination, these factors may include parental knowledge regarding cervical cancer and STIs (i.e., genital warts); perceived risk and severity of cervical cancer and genital warts; attitudes towards vaccines in general; issues concerning increase in sexual activity or promiscuity; availability of health insurance to cover vaccine costs. Additionally, a preliminary analysis of parental attitudes towards STI-prevention interventions versus anticancer interventions will be conducted to determine the policy implications of the two vaccines; one of which is part of an anticancer strategy as well as STI (genital warts) prevention and one of which only targets cervical cancer prevention.

3. Method

3.1. Search Strategy

Prior to conducting the literature search, a librarian was consulted for assistance in building a comprehensive search strategy. Relevant research studies were located through an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Searches were limited to only those studies which were published between 2001 and 2011 in an effort to obtain the most recent articles regarding parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour before and after FDA approval of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine and the bivalent HPV vaccine.

A preliminary hand search of the literature was completed in order to identify appropriate keywords and medical subject heading (MESH) terms. The terms that were selected to be used in this paper were “HPV”, “parent” and “vaccine,” with “parent-child relations,” “papillomavirus vaccine,” “parent or child parent relation,” and “wart virus vaccine” often being utilized as synonyms. Search terms were combined using the operators “AND” and “OR” to ensure that all relevant articles were located.

3.2. Study Selection

A total of 325 articles were identified: 304 from the initial search strategy and an additional 21 articles were gathered from the hand search of the literature. Following the removal of duplicates ( ), 254 articles were screened for inclusion in the paper (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria included (a) the study was about parents and their attitudes towards HPV and/or HPV vaccination; (b) the report had cross-sectional data about the parent’s knowledge, attitudes, or beliefs about HPV that were not previously influenced by the research team with an intervention. Exclusion criteria included (a) sample population was not comprised of parents; (b) knowledge, attitudes, and/or behaviours of parents not discussed in results; (c) methodology of study did not include survey; (d) article was not based on original research (i.e., the study was a literature review); (e) the full article was not available in English. The results of the study selection process are shown in Figure 1.

3.3. Data Collection and Abstraction

The data abstraction form was created and was pilot tested on five articles. Once the remaining modifications were made to the abstraction form, three coders extracted the data based on the coding information provided on the form. The data was then entered into SPSS for analysis, with information being transformed into percentages where possible. Initially, five outcomes that correspond to parental knowledge, attitudes, or behaviours were recorded. These five outcomes were that the parents had heard of HPV, heard of the HPV vaccine, knowledge of association between HPV and cervical cancer, an intention to vaccinate their child, and vaccinated their child(ren) with one or more doses of the vaccine. Following this initial analysis, an analysis of factors affecting parental attitudes toward the vaccines was conducted.

4. Results

4.1. Characteristics of Study Samples

The literature search resulted in 53 studies that met inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic paper [1163]. All included studies have been listed by publication date, research question, and focus in Figure 4. Publication dates were between the years of 2004 and 2011 with the majority of the studies being published in 2009 (28.3%) and 2010 (34.0%). Surveys were administered to parents in 2007 or earlier in 60.4% of the studies. The majority of the studies were conducted in North America (USA: 56.6%; Canada: 3.8%), however, the European Union (24.5%), Asia (9.4%), and New Zealand or Australia (5.7%) were also represented. Figure 2 highlights the geographic representation of the sample. Forty-one percent of studies were conducted in a school or medical setting, while 45.3% used some form of population-based sampling (e.g., census or government data, random digit dialling, or an existing longitudinal study), and 13.2% used other sampling procedures. These “other” sampling procedures included pretest data from an educational HPV intervention or mixed methods. Figure 3 demonstrates the methodology of the studies in the sample.

The total number of parents included in this study was 54,194 with a median study sample size of 506, and a mean study sample size of 1,022 (SD = 2,099). Six studies only reported “parents” and did not differentiate between mothers and fathers. Twenty-three studies (43%) reported mothers’ responses only. Of those studies that reported both mothers’ and fathers’ attitudes, the majority of respondents were mothers with the average sample size of mothers at 82.3% (minimum: 47.7% and maximum: 95.1%).

4.2. Framework for Analyses

Studies posed a wide variety of research questions; in order to simplify analyses, each study’s central question and results were grouped according to whether they were concerned with parental knowledge of HPV, parental behaviours toward the HPV vaccines, parental intent to vaccinate their children against HPV (attitudes), or a combination of the three factors (Table 1).


First authorPublication dateYear survey distributed Where study completedNumber of parentsPercent of mothersResearch question (purpose or intent)Knowledge focus Behaviour focus Attitude focus

Allen20102007 USA451Not specifiedDetermine factors influencing parental decisions regarding HPV vaccination in young girlsYesYesYes
Askelson20102010 USA217100%To investigate the influences of mothers' intentions to vaccinate their 9- to 15-year old daughters against HPVYesNoYes
Barnack20102006 USA10076%Examined potential predictors of parents' willingness to vaccinate their children for HPV and physicians' intentions to encourage parents to vaccinate their childrenNoNoYes
Bernat20092007 USA150472.50%Assess support for the HPV vaccine among a representative sample of parents across MinnesotaYesNoYes
Brabin20062005 GB/EU317Not specifiedAssess perceptions and attitudes to HPV vaccination as determinants of acceptance of HPV policies among a representative sample of parents of young adolescents living in ManchesterYesNoYes
Breitkopf20092007 Asia13982.7%Examine parents' perceptions of the role of mothers, fathers, and daughters in the decision to have the daughter receive the HPV vaccine; also examined perceived concordance between spouses and between parents and their daughters with regard to vaccine acceptanceYesNoYes
Brewer20112007 USA65094%(1) Characterize HPV vaccine initiation by a racially diverse sample of adolescent girls from both rural and urban areas with elevated rates of cervical cancer; (2) identify reasons for low HPV vaccine initiation rates using a longitudinal study designYesYesYes
Brown20102008 USA307100%(a) Hypothesize that consumers would have clear preferences over several features of HPV vaccines, favouring cervical cancer protection above all other features; (b) postulate that the estimated value of consumer benefits would exceed the current retail prices of HPV vaccines given the positive and increasing demand for HPV vaccines; (c) hypothesize that total uptake of HPV vaccines would increase when a 2nd vaccine was added to the USYesNoYes
Cates20102008 USA69680.6%Examined characteristics of parents, their adolescent daughters, and households as potential correlates of HPV vaccine awareness and information sources; associations of information sources with HPV vaccine initiationYesYesNo
Chan20072006 Asia170100%Studied the utility of an information pamphlet on HPV vaccine in improving acceptance of HPV vaccination for their daughters among the study subjectsYesNoYes
Chow20102008 Asia1617100%Determine attitudes and knowledge levels around cervical cancer and HPV vaccination amongst both physicians and mothers in AsiaYesYesYes
Constantine20062006 USA52273%(1) Levels of parental acceptance of HPV vaccination for adolescent and preadolescent daughters; (2) potential race/ethnicity and other subgroup disparities in acceptance rates; (3) parents' reasons for acceptance or nonacceptanceNoNoYes
Dahlstrom20092007 GB/EU1394658%Examine Swedish parents' perceptions and concerns about HPV vaccination, their willingness to vaccinate their children against HPV when the vaccine is free or not and correlates of acceptability of the new HPV vaccineYesNoYes
Davis20042003 USA50689%Ascertain parental perception and knowledge regarding HPV and to determine predictors of parental acceptance of a prophylactic HPV vaccine for their 10- to 15-year-old adolescentsYesNoYes
de Visser20082008 GB/EU353Not specifiedIdentify correlates of parents' anticipated uptake of HPV vaccination for their sons and daughtersYesNoYes
Dempsey20052007 USA41184%To measure parental acceptability of HPV vaccines—to look at the effects of HPV information on the parental acceptance of HPV vaccinationYesNoYes
Dempsey20092005 USA52100%To compare the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against HPVYesYesYes
Dinh20072005 Asia181100%Describe general attitudes toward vaccination and toward an HPV vaccine, in particular, among female caregivers of young women, also investigated potential cultural factors that may influence HPV vaccination uptakeYesNoYes
Dursun P.20092007 Turkey (multiple cities) 1427100% To measure the basal knowledge Turkish women have about HPV and their acceptance of the HPV vaccine for themselves and their children, using a national sample of Turkish womenYesNoYes
Fang20102007 USA138352.30% To report on acceptability of the HPV vaccine among a national sample of adults with female children in the household and to investigate health behaviour correlates of vaccine acceptabilityYesNoYes
Ferris20102008 USA32587%Determine factors that influence parental acceptance of a mandatory HPV vaccination programYesYesYes
Gerend20092008 USA8295%Examined parents' knowledge and beliefs about HPV vaccination, as well as correlates of HPV vaccine uptake and intentions to vaccinate a daughter/son in the futureYesYesYes
Gillespie20112011 USA8186% To evaluate HPV vaccine acceptance among parents and guardians of children aged 0–10 yearsYesNoYes
Gottlieb20092007 USA88993%Assess HPV vaccine uptake by adolescent girls, their parents' intentions for them to be vaccinated, and potential barriers to their vaccination in an area with elevated cervical cancer ratesYesYesYes
Guerry20112007 USA50986%To determine vaccine uptake among adolescent girls, parents' intentions to vaccinate their daughters and barriers and facilitators of vaccination in a population at elevated risk for cervical cancerYesYesYes
Hausdorf20072004 NZ/AU2165Not specifiedParents' willingness to vaccinate their children against HPV and impact of potential barriers to vaccinationYesNoYes
Horn20092008 USA32588.60%Determine parents' opinions about HPV vaccine mandates to more effectively implement a universal HPV-vaccination programYesYesYes
Hughes20092007 USA88994%Examine whether HPV and HPV vaccine awareness, knowledge, and use of information sources differ by caregivers' sex, race, age, education, income, and rural/urban residence; chose to examine variables associated with cervical cancer disease burdenYesYesNo
Ilter20102009 GB/EU131100%To examine Muslim Turkish women's knowledge about cervical cancer screening (Pap smear) test, HPV, HPV vaccine, and their attitude toward vaccination to themselves and their daughtersNoNoYes
Kahn20092007 USA7207100% To examine mothers’ intention to vaccinate their daughters and themselves against HPV and to determine which demographic, behavioural, and attitudinal factors were associated with intention to vaccinate daughtersNoNoYes
Kang20102009 Asia667100%To examine the attitudes, intentions, and perceived barriers to HPV vaccination among Korean high school girls and their mothersYesNoYes
Lenselink20072007 GB/EU35691%Assess whether Dutch parents agree to vaccinate their children against HPV infections, which factors influence their decisions and to study their knowledge about HPV, cervical cancer and HPV vaccinationYesNoYes
Marlow20082006 GB/EU296100%Willingness to have their daughters vaccinatedNoNoYes
Marlow20072007 GB/EU684100% To examine the association between general vaccine attitudes, trust in doctors and the government, past experience with vaccination, and acceptance of HPV vaccinationNoNoYes
Marlow20092006 GB/EU332100% To examine the prevalence and predictors of the belief that HPV vaccination will result in “risk compensation,” that is, will increase risky sexual behaviourYesNoYes
Marshall20072006 NZ/AU601Not specifiedAssess community (adult and parental) attitudes in both men and women to the introduction of HPV vaccines in metropolitan and rural South AustraliaNoNoYes
Mortensen20102010 GB/EU45073%Assess parental attitudes towards male HPV vaccination in terms of their acceptance, refusal, or doubts, and who they relied on for informationNoYesYes
Ogilvie20102009 Canada202584.90%Assess the level of uptake of the first dose of the HPV vaccine and to determine the factors associated with receipt of the HPV vaccineYesYesYes
Ogilvie20082007 Canada208373.50%Ascertain parental intentions to vaccinate their sons against HPV in Canada and to determine factors that predict parental intention to vaccinate their sons against HPVYesNoYes
Pelucchi20102008 GB/EU233152.60%Provide basic data necessary for the development of adequate training programs for health professionalsYesNoYes
Podolsky20092009 USA308100%Comparing two populations to gain insight into the potential impact of differences such as vaccine availability, media attention, attitudes about vaccines in general, and knowledge about HPV and vaccine acceptabilityYesNoYes
Rand20112008 USA382100%Factors influencing acceptance of vaccine: perceived susceptibility to HPV; benefits of vaccination, safety concerns; parents satisfaction with communication of vaccineYesYesYes
Reiter20102008 USA61783%Assessing vaccine initiation for HPVNoYesYes
Reiter20102010 USA406100%Acceptability after FDA approval for sonsYesNoYes
Reiter20092007 USA88994%Identify parent beliefs associated with HPV vaccine initiation; determine if associations differed by race and urban/rural statusNoYesYes
Reiter20112011 USA647Not specifiedAssess correlates of uptake of 3 vaccines (tetanus booster, meningococcal, and HPV vaccines) recommended for adolescent femalesNoYesNo
Rose20102008 NZ/AU76994.3%To describe parents' preferences on where their daughters receive the HPV vaccine, at what age, and their information needsNoNoYes
Rosenthal20082007 USA15389%Examine relationships of demographics, parenting, and vaccine attitudes with the acceptance of HPV vaccine or to the intent to vaccinate in the next 12 monthsNoYesYes
Toffolon-Weiss20082007 USA8080%To describe Alaska native-parents knowledge of and attitudes towards cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV vaccineYesNoNo
Tozzi20092007 GB/EU807100%(1) Assess parents' knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccination and their willingness to have their daughters immunized; (2) to investigate the roles of the different medical specialists in the immunization strategy as perceived by parentsYesNoYes
Woodhall20072005 GB/EU72770%To examine acceptance of HPV vaccination by adolescents and their parentsYesNoYes
Yeganeh20102008 USA95100%Examine factors associated with parental consent for HPV vaccination one year after vaccine implementation as well as parental support for an HPV vaccine mandate for middle-school-age childrenYesYesYes
Ziarnowski20092007 USA88994%Examined the role of anticipated regret in caregivers' HPV vaccination decisions as well as potential antecedents of anticipated regretNoYesYes

Of the 53 studies included, 73.6% (39/53) attempted to gauge parental knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine. This ranged from whether parents were aware of HPV to whether parents could correctly identify HPV as the causative agent of cervical cancer. Thirty-eight percent (20/53) of studies focused on parental behaviour (i.e., whether parents had already inoculated their child or children against HPV with either of the two vaccines available). Finally, 92.5% (49/53) of studies focused on parental attitudes toward the vaccine (whether parents intend to vaccinate their children against HPV). Many studies also focused on factors affecting parental attitudes and behaviour regarding the HPV vaccine. These factors included perceived vaccine efficacy; vaccine safety; perceived threat of HPV. They will be discussed more thoroughly in the section regarding factors and barriers.

4.3. Knowledge Trends

Three primary knowledge questions were examined: whether parents had heard of HPV, whether they had heard of the HPV vaccine, and whether they could correctly identify the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer. Of the 53 studies, 19 studies (36%) asked parents whether they had heard of HPV prior to being included in the study (Figure 4).

Parental awareness of HPV increased in 2008 and 2009. Of the 53 studies, 15 studies (28%) asked parents whether they had heard of the HPV vaccines prior to being included in the study (Figure 5).

Parental awareness of the HPV vaccine spiked in 2007 with a mean percentage of 59% compared to 14% in 2006. Awareness continued to climb to 65% in 2008 and dropped off slightly to 47% by 2010. These years are of particular interest since they mark the introduction and availability of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine and the bivalent HPV vaccine. Of the 53 studies, 5 studies (9%) asked parents if they could identify the relationship between cervical cancer and HPV (Figure 6).

It is important to note that only 5 studies asked parents to make the connection between HPV and cervical cancer. In the study in which data were collected most recently (2011), an average of 74% of parents could correctly identify the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer. With only 5 studies examining parental knowledge of the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, it is difficult to make any connections between knowledge and the introduction and availability of the HPV vaccine.

4.4. Behaviour Trends

Of the 53 studies, 17 studies (32%) asked parents whether their child or children had already been vaccinated against HPV (Figure 7).

Following the availability of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in 2007, studies began asking whether parents had already vaccinated their children against HPV. The highest percentages of parents who had vaccinated their children against HPV occurred in 2009 and 2010. This is following the introduction and availability of the bivalent HPV vaccine in 2009.

4.5. Attitude Trends

Of the 53 studies included, 30 studies (57%) asked parents whether they intend to vaccinate their child or children against HPV (Figure 8).

The highest percentage of parents who intend to vaccinate their children (86%) occurs in studies where the data were collected in 2005, prior to the release of the first HPV vaccine. Intent increases in 2008 to 80% of parents from 67% in 2007 and then gradually decreases in 2009, 2010, and 2011.

All three knowledge components have increased from pre-2007 studies to post-2007 studies. While levels of uptake pre-2007 and post-2007 cannot be compared, intent to vaccinate has decreased from pre-2007 to post-2007 (Table 2).


Number of studiesRange values 2007 or earlierNumber of studiesRange values 2008 or later
2007 or earliermin %max %2008 or latermin %max %

Heard of HPV1259.059.5764.793.0
Heard of HPV vaccine1014.058.7547.064.5
Understood connection between HPV and Cervical Cancer48.070.0153.491.0
Parent intends to vaccinate child2254.086.0847.079.5
Child is vaccinated HPVNANA1724.984.0

4.6. Factors Affecting Parental Decision to Vaccinate

Of the 53 studies included, 81% made some mentioning of examining barriers to parental intent to vaccinate. Parental experiences and demographic characteristics were too mixed to show any clear pattern within the 53 studies. Cost factors were also mentioned, but were difficult to compare across studies.

4.7. Knowledge

Parents Concerned about the Safety of the HPV Vaccine
In 20 studies (37%), parents expressed concerns about vaccine safety and the potential side effects of the HPV vaccine [13, 15, 20, 23, 30, 32, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 42, 4648, 5254, 60, 61].

Parents Wanted More Information about the Vaccine to Make an Informed Decision as to Whether They Should Vaccinate Their Child with the HPV Vaccine
In 13 studies (25%), parents needed more information about HPV vaccination [17, 30, 34, 41, 42, 4648, 51, 52, 54, 60, 62].

4.8. Attitudes

Parents Who Were Concerned about the Potential Risk of Cancer Were More Likely to Vaccinate for HPV
In 16 studies (30%), parents mentioned a concern about cancer risk as increasing the likelihood of HPV vaccination. Parents who believed it was likely that their daughters might contract HPV [13, 15, 18, 3133, 50, 52], develop cervical or penile cancer [13, 18, 20, 30, 31, 39, 47, 50, 53, 60, 62, 63] or genital warts [13, 18, 47, 62] were more likely to vaccinate their daughters.

Parents Agreed That Children Should Be Older and Sexually Active to Receive the Vaccine
There were 10 studies (19%) that mentioned the child’s age affecting the parents’ decision to vaccinate. Parents were less likely to vaccinate their children if they believed their children were too young or not sexually active [34, 40, 44, 48]. Some studies indicated that parents were more likely to vaccinate their children if they were sexually active [23] or older [32, 34, 5355, 57].

Mixed Opinions About Parental Concerns for Increased or More Risky Sexual Activity If Child Is Vaccinated
Parents were not concerned that their children would become sexually active if they were given the HPV vaccine in 13 studies (25%) [12, 14, 17, 28, 3234, 39, 42, 46, 51, 60, 62], while in six studies (13%), parents expressed concerns that the HPV vaccine might encourage earlier sexual initiation, or more risky sexual behaviours in their children [15, 23, 43, 4850, 61].

4.9. Behaviours

Parents Looked to Their Physicians to Recommend the HPV Vaccine
In 17 studies (32%), parents indicated that having their doctors recommend the vaccine increased the likelihood of HPV vaccination [17, 19, 24, 28, 3035, 41, 47, 5153, 60, 62].

Parental Attitudes towards Vaccines Generally Indicated Whether They Were in Favour of Vaccinating Their Children for HPV
Parents who had previously vaccinated their children against meningitis [19] or had a general belief in the efficacy of vaccines [15, 24, 25, 32, 45, 4850, 62] were more likely to vaccinate (10 studies or 19%). Parents who had refused previous vaccines for their children [11, 18, 45, 47, 63] and had concerns about too many vaccinations [45, 60] were less likely to vaccinate (6 studies or 11%).

5. Discussion

This paper reviews the parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours toward having their daughters and sons vaccinated against cervical cancer. The parents in these studies were largely from a high resource background. The percentage of parents that participated in these surveys who had heard about HPV clearly rose over time (from 60% in 2005 to 93% in 2009). Parents’ appreciation for the link between HPV infection and cervical cancer did rise (70% in 2003 to 91% in 2011). During the era of FDA approval of the vaccines, there appeared to be stronger awareness of the vaccines and this has waned with time. This same pattern is seen with the percentage of parents whose children had received the HPV vaccine (high of 84% in 2010 and now 36% in 2011). Unfortunately, this pattern is also seen with the intention to have a child vaccinated against HPV (peak at 80% in 2008 and now 41% in 2011).

In terms of barriers against the vaccine, parents still have safety and side-effect questions and they want more information. Parents view the vaccine like the oral contraceptive pill; it is best to invest in it only when you become at risk (i.e., you are sexually active). Parents who have high cancer worries and receive strong messages about HPV risks are more likely to advocate for the HPV vaccine. Parents look to their physicians to recommend the vaccine.

The strengths of this study are that it involves information gathered from a large number of parents from several countries. It shows trends in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours over a time period just preceding the FDA approval of the vaccine; during the approval phase when there were extensive educational campaigns both by the pharmaceutical companies, professional societies, and media, after the FDA approval. The limitations of this study was an inability to validate parental responses, for example, determining how many parents had their child vaccinated with at least one dose of the vaccine.

It will be interesting to see if there are changes in parental attitudes as the types of information about HPV and the HPV vaccine continue to flood the literature. The information about the role of oncogenic HPV in more than cervical cancer is certainly evolving. We are just beginning to grasp the prevention implications of the HPV vaccine in the prevention of anal, oropharengeal, and a proportion of vulvovaginal, and penile cancers. The recent approval of the vaccine in young men may have an impact on decreasing condyloma transmission and having an impact on the rise of anal dysplasia/cancer in the male having sex with male population. As the cervical screening strategy moves toward primary HPV testing, this will also enhance education of the population. Although cost did not emerge as a significant barrier, as the vaccine prices continue to fall, it will be fascinating to see the impact on parental attitudes and behaviour. As public health looks at successful population-based prevention strategies, it will be interesting to look at parental attitudes toward passive consent versus active consent in school-based vaccination programs. Time will provide information on how durable the vaccine is and long-term sequelae; whether this will influence parental attitudes remains to be seen.

In terms of future implications for policy, when the goal is to preserve the health of the population, certainly the passive consent approach, whether it is for vaccination or cervical screening, seems to be showing profound benefits. There is preliminary data that shows women who are vaccinated have less need for cervical precancer procedures like biopsies and treatment, however, how this will impact guidelines and availability of such services in the future remains to be seen.

6. Conclusion

Initial awareness of the virus and the ability of the virus to cause cancer have increased in the time period under study. However, awareness of the vaccine, intent to vaccinate, rates of vaccination rose during the initial introduction of the HPV vaccine but have fallen in subsequent years. Surveys have confirmed that parents want more knowledge and reassurance from their physicians that the HPV vaccine is safe for their children to receive. Policy programs, aimed at increasing HPV vaccination rates as part of an overall HPV strategy to reduce the incidents of cancers and infections caused by the virus, will need to heed the parents’ concerns and information needs to be effective.

References

  1. J. M. M. Walboomers, M. V. Jacobs, M. M. Manos et al., “Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. HPV Info, “What is HPV?” The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2009, http://hpvinfo.ca/hpvinfo/professionals/overview-2.aspx. View at: Google Scholar
  3. HPV Info, “Incidence and prevalence in Canada,” The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2009, http://hpvinfo.ca/hpvinfo/professionals/overview-3.aspx. View at: Google Scholar
  4. K. A. Ault, A. R. Giuliano, R. P. Edwards et al., “A phase I study to evaluate a human papillomavirus (HPV) type 18 L1 VLP vaccine,” Vaccine, vol. 22, no. 23-24, pp. 3004–3007, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Approved Products: Gardasil,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md, USA, http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM094042. View at: Google Scholar
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Approved Products: Cervarix,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md, USA, http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm186957.htm. View at: Google Scholar
  7. An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS), National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), “Statement on human papillomavirus vaccine,” Public Health Agency of Canada, vol. 33, ACS-2, February 2007.
  8. Public Health Division, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, “Initial report on public health,” Tech. Rep., Public Health Division, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Canada, August 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. O. Mackie, J. A. Buxton, S. Tadwalkar, and D. M. Patrick, “Hepatitis B immunization strategies: timing is everything,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 196–202, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. E. Markowitz, E. F. Dunne, M. Saraiya, H. W. Lawson, H. Chesson, and E. R. Unger, “Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),” MMWR—Recommendations and Reports, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 1–24, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. D. Allen, M. K. D. Othus, R. C. Shelton et al., “Parental decision making about the HPV vaccine,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2187–2198, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. M. Askelson, S. Campo, J. B. Lowe, S. Smith, L. K. Dennis, and J. Andsager, “Using the theory of planned behavior to predict mothers' intentions to vaccinate their daughters against HPV,” Journal of School Nursing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 194–202, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. L. Barnack, D. M. Reddy, and C. Swain, “Predictors of parents' willingness to vaccinate for human papillomavirus and physicians' intentions to recommend the vaccine,” Women's Health Issues, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. H. Bernat, S. B. Harpin, M. E. Eisenberg, L. H. Bearinger, and M. D. Resnick, “Parental support for the human papillomavirus vaccine,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 525–527, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Brabin, S. A. Roberts, F. Farzaneh, and H. C. Kitchener, “Future acceptance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination: a survey of parental attitudes,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 16, pp. 3087–3094, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. R. Breitkopf, H. C. Pearson, T. A. Dinh et al., “Human papillomavirus vaccine decision-making in Da Nang, Vietnam: perceived spousal and adolescent-parent concordance,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 2367–2371, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. T. Brewer, S. L. Gottlieb, P. L. Reiter et al., “Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 197–204, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. S. Brown, F. R. Johnson, C. Poulos, and M. L. Messonnier, “Mothers' preferences and willingness to pay for vaccinating daughters against human papillomavirus,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1702–1708, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. R. Cates, A. Shafer, F. D. Carpentier et al., “How parents hear about human papillomavirus vaccine: implications for uptake,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 305–308, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. S. Chan, T. H. Cheung, W. K. Lo, and T. K. H. Chung, “Women's attitudes on human papillomavirus vaccination to their daughters,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 204–207, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. N. Chow, R. Soon, J. S. Park et al., “Knowledge, attitudes, and communication around human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination amongst urban Asian mothers and physicians,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 3809–3817, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. A. Constantine and P. Jerman, “Acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccination among Californian parents of daughters: a representative statewide analysis,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. A. Dahlstrom, T. N. Tran, C. Lundholm, C. Young, K. Sundstrom, and P. Sparen, “Attitudes to HPV vaccination among parents of children aged 12–15 years—a population-based survey in Sweden,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 500–507, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. Davis, E. D. Dickman, D. Ferris, and J. K. Dias, “Human papillomavirus vaccine acceptability among parents of 10- to 15-year-old adolescents,” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 188–194, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. de Visser and E. McDonnell, “Correlates of parents' reports of acceptability of human papilloma virus vaccination for their school-aged children,” Sexual Health, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 331–338, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. F. Dempsey, L. M. Abraham, V. Dalton, and M. Ruffin, “Understanding the reasons why mothers do or do not have their adolescent daughters vaccinated against human papillomavirus,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 531–538, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. F. Dempsey, G. D. Zimet, R. L. Davis, and L. Koutsky, “Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV,” Pediatrics, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1486–1493, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. A. Dinh, S. L. Rosenthal, E. D. Doan et al., “Attitudes of mothers in Da Nang, Vietnam toward a human papillomavirus vaccine,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 559–563, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Dursun, B. Altuntas, E. Kuscu, and A. Ayhan, “Women's knowledge about human papillomavirus and their acceptance of HPV vaccine,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 202–206, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Y. Fang, E. J. Coups, and C. J. Heckman, “Behavioral correlates of HPV vaccine acceptability in the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS),” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 319–326, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Ferris, L. Horn, and J. L. Waller, “Parental acceptance of a mandatory human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program,” Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 220–229, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. A. Gerend, E. Weibley, and H. Bland, “Parental response to human papillomavirus vaccine availability: uptake and intentions,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 528–531, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Gillespie, C. W. Hicks, M. Santana et al., “The acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccine among parents and guardians of newborn to 10-year-old children,” Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 66–70, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. L. Gottlieb, N. T. Brewer, M. R. Sternberg et al., “Human papillomavirus vaccine initiation in an area with elevated rates of cervical cancer,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 430–437, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. L. Guerry, C. J. De Rosa, L. E. Markowitz et al., “Human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in high-risk communities,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2235–2241, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  36. K. Hausdorf, B. Newman, D. Whiteman, J. Aitken, and I. Frazer, “HPV vaccination: what do Queensland parents think?” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 288–289, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Horn, C. Howard, J. Waller, and D. G. Ferris, “Opinions of parents about school-entry mandates for the human papillomavirus vaccine,” Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Hughes, J. R. Cates, N. Liddon, J. S. Smith, S. L. Gottlieb, and N. T. Brewer, “Disparities in how parents are learning about the human papillomavirus vaccine,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 363–372, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Ilter, A. Celik, B. Haliloglu et al., “Women's knowledge of Pap smear test and human papillomavirus: acceptance of HPV vaccination to themselves and their daughters in an islamic society,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1058–1062, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Kahn, L. Ding, B. Huang, G. D. Zimet, S. L. Rosenthal, and A. L. Frazier, “Mothers' intention for their daughters and themselves to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine: a national study of nurses,” Pediatrics, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1439–1445, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. S. Kang and L. Moneyham, “Attitudes, intentions, and perceived barriers to human papillomavirus vaccination among Korean high school girls and their mothers,” Cancer Nursing, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 202–208, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. H. Lenselink, M. M. Gerrits, W. J. Melchers, L. F. Massuger, D. van Hamont, and R. L. Bekkers, “Parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines,” European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 103–107, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  43. L. A. Marlow, A. S. Forster, J. Wardle, and J. Waller, “Mothers' and adolescents' beliefs about risk compensation following HPV vaccination,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 446–451, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. A. Marlow, J. Waller, and J. Wardle, “Sociodemographic predictors of HPV testing and vaccination acceptability: results from a population-representative sample of British women,” Journal of Medical Screening, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. A. Marlow, J. Waller, and J. Wardle, “Trust and experience as predictors of HPV vaccine acceptance,” Human Vaccines, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 171–175, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  46. H. Marshall, P. Ryan, D. Roberton, and P. Baghurst, “A cross-sectional survey to assess community attitudes to introduction of human papillomavirus vaccine,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 235–242, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. L. Mortensen, “Parental attitudes towards vaccinating sons with human papillomavirus vaccine,” Danish Medical Bulletin, vol. 57, no. 12, article A4230, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  48. G. Ogilvie, M. Anderson, F. Marra et al., “A population-based evaluation of a publicly funded, school-based HPV vaccine program in British Columbia, Canada: parental factors associated with HPV vaccine receipt,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, article e1000270, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. G. S. Ogilvie, V. P. Remple, F. Marra et al., “Intention of parents to have male children vaccinated with the human papillomavirus vaccine,” Sexually Transmitted Infections, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 318–323, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Pelucchi, S. Esposito, C. Galeone et al., “Knowledge of human papillomavirus infection and its prevention among adolescents and parents in the greater Milan area, Northern Italy,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, article 378, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Podolsky, M. Cremer, J. Atrio, T. Hochman, and A. A. Arslan, “HPV vaccine acceptability by Latino parents: a comparison of U.S. and Salvadoran populations,” Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 205–215, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. M. Rand, S. J. Schaffer, S. G. Humiston et al., “Patient-provider communication and human papillomavirus vaccine acceptance,” Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. L. Reiter, N. T. Brewer, S. L. Gottlieb, A. L. McRee, and J. S. Smith, “Parents' health beliefs and HPV vaccination of their adolescent daughters,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 475–480, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. L. Reiter, J. R. Cates, A. L. McRee et al., “Statewide HPV vaccine initiation among adolescent females in North Carolina,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 549–556, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. P. L. Reiter, A. L. McRee, S. L. Gottlieb, and N. T. Brewer, “Correlates of receiving recommended adolescent vaccines among adolescent females in North Carolina,” Human Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. L. Reiter, A. L. McRee, S. L. Gottlieb, and N. T. Brewer, “HPV vaccine for adolescent males: acceptability to parents post-vaccine licensure,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 38, pp. 6292–6297, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. B. Rose, B. A. Lawton, T. Lanumata, M. Hibma, and M. G. Baker, “HPV/cervical cancer vaccination: parental preferences on age, place and information needs,” Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 190–198, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. L. Rosenthal, R. Rupp, G. D. Zimet et al., “Uptake of HPV vaccine: demographics, sexual history and values, parenting style, and vaccine attitudes,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 239–245, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Toffolon-Weiss, K. Hagan, J. Leston, L. Peterson, E. Provost, and T. Hennessy, “Alaska Native parental attitudes on cervical cancer, HPV and the HPV vaccine,” International Journal of Circumpolar Health, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 363–373, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  60. A. E. Tozzi, L. Rava, D. Stat, E. Pandolfi, M. G. Marino, and A. G. Ugazio, “Attitudes towards HPV immunization of Italian mothers of adolescent girls and potential role of health professionals in the immunization program,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 19, pp. 2625–2629, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. C. Woodhall, M. Lehtinen, T. Verho, H. Huhtala, M. Hokkanen, and E. Kosunen, “Anticipated acceptance of HPV vaccination at the baseline of implementation: a survey of parental and adolescent knowledge and attitudes in Finland,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 466–469, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. N. Yeganeh, D. Curtis, and A. Kuo, “Factors influencing HPV vaccination status in a Latino population; and parental attitudes towards vaccine mandates,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 25, pp. 4186–4191, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. L. Ziarnowski, N. T. Brewer, and B. Weber, “Present choices, future outcomes: anticipated regret and HPV vaccination,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 411–414, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Kristina Trim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

6651 Views | 3810 Downloads | 62 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.