Obstetrics and Gynecology International

Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Female Genital Mutilation, Cutting, or Circumcision

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 643780 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/643780

Adriana Kaplan, Babucarr Cham, Lamin A. Njie, Ana Seixas, Sandra Blanco, Mireia Utzet, "Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: The Secret World of Women as Seen by Men", Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2013, Article ID 643780, 11 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/643780

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: The Secret World of Women as Seen by Men

Academic Editor: Johanne Sundby
Received29 Mar 2013
Revised27 May 2013
Accepted16 Jun 2013
Published10 Jul 2013


Efforts aimed at the abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the communities where it is deeply rooted have extensively considered and addressed women’s perceptions on the issue, leaving those of men barely acknowledged. Although the practice is generally confined to the secret world of women, it does not mean that men cannot be influential. Indeed, men can play an important role in prevention. In order to address this gap, and having as background an extensive ethnographic field work, a transversal descriptive study was designed to explore Gambian men’s knowledge and attitudes towards FGM/C, as well as related practices in their family/household. Results show ethnic identity, more than religion, as the decisive shaping factor on how men conceive and value FGM/C. The greater support towards the practice is found among traditionally practicing groups. A substantial proportion of men intend to have it performed on their daughters, although reporting a low involvement in the decision making process, with very few taking alone the final decision. Only a minority is aware of FGM/C health consequences, but those who understand its negative impact on the health and well-being of girls and women are quite willing to play a role in its prevention.

1. Introduction

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1] as all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or injury to the female genital organs, for nontherapeutic reasons. The WHO classifies the practice into four types: type I (clitoridectomy), type II (excision), and type III (infibulation) are ordered according to a growing level of severity, while type IV comprises all other harmful procedures performed on the female genitalia for nonmedical purposes (e.g., pricking, piercing, incising, scraping, and cauterization).

According to the WHO latest data, 140 million women and girls in the whole world are thought to have been subjected to the practice, and 3 million girls are at risk of having it performed every year. FGM/C constitutes an extreme form of discrimination and violation of the human rights of girls and women, with health consequences now acknowledged and documented. In the short term, the practice can result in shock, haemorrhage, infections, and psychological consequences, while in the long term it can lead to chronic pain, infections, keloids, fibrosis, primary infertility, increase in delivery complications, and psychological sequela/trauma [27].

FGM/C has been practiced for centuries, having acquired a deep cultural meaning. Under a shared vision of the world where life is understood in cycles, FGM/C had been linked with the moment in which a girl becomes a woman in many societies. During the rite of passage to adulthood, within a ceremony secretly kept from outsiders, especially men, initiates were taught about the cultural and social wealth of their community, as well as their roles and responsibilities as women, mothers and wives, establishing gender power relationships [8]. The physical cutting would be the proof that a girl was granted with all necessary teachings that make her worthy to belong to her community. FGM/C had become a synonym of cleanliness, femininity, beauty, and purity, a way to protect virginity, guarantee “family’s honour,” and ensure marriageability [9, 10].

In The Gambia, the overall prevalence is estimated at 76.3% [11], meaning that it affects approximately 3 out of 4 women. However, this global figure obviates important discrepancies within regions and ethnic groups, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.

RegionLocal government areaPrevalence

Great Banjul AreaBanjul56.3%
West Coast RegionBrikama84.5%
Lower River RegionMansakonko90.6%
North Bank RegionKerewan49.2%
Central River RegionKuntaur63.4%
Upper River RegionBasse99.0%

Source: MICS2010, UNICEF The Gambia—GBOs.

Ethnic groupPrevalence


Source: MICS2010, UNICEF The Gambia—GBOs.

Its impact for health has been assessed in two clinical studies conducted in-country by the first author of the present paper, which revealed that 1 out of 3 girls and women presented injuries as a consequence of the practice [12] and the risk of complications during delivery and for the newborn increased 4.5 times for women with FGM/C [13]. Whilst these girls and women will need specific medical care for decades to come, prevention is an urgent step. However, strategies need to be carefully designed in order to respect the deep cultural value of the practice within the communities where it is performed.

Although traditionally the practice was part of the rite of passage to womanhood among certain ethnic groups, as extensively described in an ethnographic research conducted by the first author of this paper [8], over the past generation several changes have been occurring. In a recent study, Shell-Duncan et al. [14] found that the physical cutting is increasingly becoming divorced from the traditional ritual. FGM/C is not a condition to ensure marriageability, but mainly a way to facilitate entry into a social network and have access to social support and resources, with peer pressure playing a major role in its perpetuation.

In order to gather evidence to inform prevention strategies, many studies have focused in women’s perception regarding the practice, but much is still unknown about the role played by men on its perpetuation. However, their perception of the “secret world of women” might bring important elements to understand the context in which the practice occurs, as well as enlighten effective ways to involve them in prevention. What lies under their support towards the practice? Do they establish a parallelism with male circumcision, the cutting-off of the penis’ foreskin prepuce? Indeed, in all the societies where FGM/C is found, male circumcision is also performed [15], sometimes linked to the rite of passage to adulthood as a keystone component of the socialization process. It has a similar hygienic and aesthetic meaning and an analogous power to preserve ethnic and gender identities [2, 3, 8, 16]. A deep situation analysis on FGM/C conducted in The Gambia in 1999 [17] revealed that some respondents established a parallelism between the two practices. Since Islam endorses male circumcision as an acceptable practice and makes no distinction between genders, some would argue that female circumcision is also prescribed.

Acknowledging this gap, a new line of research is now emerging, interested in exploring how men position themselves on the matter, with the objective of assessing their potential inclusion in preventive actions and programmes. The results obtained so far have showed different—and sometimes contradictory—levels of involvement and support towards FGM/C that seem to be influenced by sociodemographic variables, such as ethnicity and religion [1820]. Others have highlighted that both men and women blame each other for the continuation of the practice and position themselves as victims [21]. In a recent study conducted in The Gambia with health care professionals [22], it was discovered that FGM/C found higher support among men. While women would give more strength to the deep cultural roots of the tradition, men seemed to privilege a moral perspective, prioritizing the fact that the practice is mandatory by religion and attenuates women’s sexual feelings, contributing to family honour.

This study intends to contribute towards this field of research, by exploring the knowledge and attitudes of Gambian men towards FGM/C, as well as practices in their family and household. It expects to help to increase the understanding of the social environment embedding the practice, in order to inform prevention strategies that might successfully accelerate its abandonment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design of the Study

A transversal descriptive study was designed with the main objective of assessing the knowledge and attitudes of Gambian men on FGM/C, as well as related practices in their family/household, exploring eventual associations with sociodemographic characteristics.

A secondary objective was to empower and promote knowledge’s ownership of the native population, through a strategy designed to build capacities on FGM/C and social research skills. For this reason, the study was integrated in the Practicum of Community Medicine of the School for Enrolled Community Health Nurses and Midwives (ECHN/M) at Mansakonko, Lower River Region. Students were given the responsibility for data collection, under the supervision of their tutors and trainers from Wassu Gambia Kafo (WGK), the non-governmental organization that supported the study.

To ensure the accuracy of this process, students received specific training on social research skills, by a team consisting of a medical anthropologist and ECHN/M tutors. Furthermore, prior to their involvement on this study, students had already been trained on FGM/C identification, management and prevention, as their school is one of the health schools that integrated FGM/C in its Academic Curriculum—an initiative of WGK.

The survey was implemented through questionnaires administered face to face. Taking into consideration the sensitivity of the topic, it was considered that the best strategy to avoid resistance was to administer the questionnaires in the communities where these students were doing their practicum, and in their home villages. In this way, it was ensured that (1) they were known and respected; (2) shared the same cultural background of the interviewees; and (3) were able to speak their local language, what contributed to create an environment of trust conducive to conduct the interviews. The selection of the communities where the practicum was conducted was a responsibility of ECHN/M tutors.

As a consequence of this strategy, the survey was implemented in three regions of the country: Lower River Region, North Bank Region, and West Coast Region. According to Census 2003, the population in the first two regions is predominantly rural (80% approximately), while in West Coast Region is mainly urban (60%) [23]. As stated in Table 1, FGM/C prevalence rates in these regions are 90.6%, 49.2%, and 84.5%, respectively [11].

2.2. Research Population

The overall sample is composed of 993 men. The study intended to capture men with heterogeneous profiles in terms of occupation, age, ethnicity, religion, and marital status, both from rural and urban areas. Due to the fact that this study was integrated on a strategy to build students and tutors capacities on social research, it was considered that a quota sampling method was the most feasible method to apply. Each student was requested to administrate the questionnaire to 30 men.

2.3. KAP Questionnaire

The data collection tool was a questionnaire with nineteen close-ended questions, designed to gather information on men’s knowledge and attitudes with regard to FGM/C, related practices in their families/households, and sociodemographic data.

The questionnaire was developed by a researcher and medical anthropologist, having as background former ethnographic studies conducted in the country since 1989 [8].

Although the questionnaire was drawn up in English, the official language of The Gambia, students were carefully instructed to know how to administer it in local languages whenever needed, in order to ensure an accurate understanding of the questions and of what was meant by “FGM/C.” In The Gambia, the practice is generally conceived as the equivalent to types I and II as established by WHO, which are the most prevalent in the country (66.2% and 26.3%, resp., [12]). Each ethnic group has specific words to distinguish the “cutting” and the “sealing” formed during the healing process after cutting and repositioning the labia.

2.4. Variables

The five socio-demographic variables comprised occupation (agriculture, livestock, and fishery sector; services sector; health professionals; education professionals; students), age, ethnic group (Mandinka, Wolof, Fula, Djola, Serahule, and Serer), religion (Muslim, Christian), and marital status (married, single). The variables analyzed, chosen from the questionnaire, are presented below. Among them, Q1, Q5, Q8, Q13, and Q15 were selected as active variables for the Cluster Analysis.(i)Q1. Is FGM/C practiced in your family/household? (Yes/No)(ii)Q3. At what age is FGM/C done on girls in your family/household? (0–3/Above 4) (iii)Q5. Do you take part in the decision making process on FGM/C? (Yes/No)(iv)Q6. Who takes the final decision to practice FGM/C on your daughter? (Men/Women/Both men and women/Other relatives, community members)(v)Q8. Do you know of any health consequences related to FGM/C? (Yes/No)(vi)Q9. Is FGM/C a mandatory practice by religion? (Yes/No)(vii)Q10. Is FGM/C equivalent to male circumcision? (Yes/No)(viii)Q13. Do you think men have a role to play in preventing FGM/C? (Yes/No)(ix)Q15. If you have a daughter in the future, do you intend to circumcise her? (Yes/No)(x)Q16. Do you think that the practice of FGM/C should continue? (Yes/No).

2.5. Ethical Aspects

The study was submitted and approved by The Gambia Government/Medical Research Council Laboratories Joint Ethics Committee (Ref: R08002). The purpose of the research was carefully explained and clarified by the students to the interviewees. The administration of the questionnaires only took place after respondents’ signature or thumb print on an informed consent that was kept under the custody of WGK. The identity of the participants was maintained through rigorous confidentiality.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A descriptive analysis was carried out of the main variables, and prevalence proportions (%) and 95% confidence intervals (95%  CI) were calculated for the overall sample and, in order to detect differences, for each of the socio-demographic variables (occupation, age, ethnic group, religion, and marital status). Prevalence proportions were compared with Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. Unspecified data (“other religion” and “other ethnic group”) were not taken into account in the analysis.

Statistically significant differences were considered at .

A multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and a cluster analysis were conducted to detect underlying groups of individuals according to their knowledge and attitudes regarding FGM/C, as well as related practices in their families/households, as defined by the active variables. The five socio-demographic variables were included as supplementary information, allowing the identification of opposite profiles of men towards the practice.

The information was computerized via EpiData. Descriptive univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted through SPSS Version 19, while MCA and cluster analysis through SPAD version 5.6.

2.7. Methodological Issues

The main methodological issue regarding this study has to do with the sensitivity of the topic itself, as it is common to find resistance to talk openly about FGM/C, especially to an outsider. This was addressed by giving Gambian students the responsibility for interviewing people in communities where they were known and respected. Another methodological issue is related to the fact that Serahule’s sample size was quite small (only 12 individuals).

3. Results

The socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents are shown in Table 5. The sample was composed predominantly of young men, their mean age being 36.5 years old, with Muslim affiliation (96.2%). The majority were married (74.4%) and worked in agriculture, livestock, and fishery (51.3%) or in services sector (20.6%). However, the sample also included education and health care professionals (7.8% and 7.0%, resp.) and a few students (7.6%). With regard to ethnicity, 41.2% were Mandinka, 19.9% Wolof, 17.6% Fula, 9.7% Djola, and 1.2% Serahule.

The prevalence proportions and 95% CI of knowledge, attitudes, and practices, according to socio-demographic variables, are presented in Table 3. FGM/C appears in this study as a widespread practice, with a prevalence rate (70.0%) not far from the most recent official data (76.3%). A total of 61.8% men embrace its continuation and 60.7% intend to have it performed on their daughters in the future. Although FGM/C is mainly performed by families affiliated with Islam (72.5% versus 27.3% Christians, ), prevalence proportions disagree amongst Muslims with different ethnic backgrounds. With statistically significant differences, traditionally practicing groups (Mandinka, Djola, Fula, and Serahule) are the ones reporting the highest prevalence rates in their families/households, expressing the highest support towards the continuation of the practice and the strongest willingness to have it performed on their daughters.


Q1. Is FGM/C practiced in your family/household?a Q3. At what age is FGM/C done on girls in your family/household?b,c Q5. Do you take part in the decision making process on FGM/C in your family?a,c
% (95% CI) %(95% CI) % (95% CI)

 Agriculture, livestock, and fishery sector31664.1 (59.8; 68.4)10937.8(32.2; 43.5)10934.6(29.2; 40.0)
 Services sector15175.9(69.7; 82.1)5441.2(32.7; 49.7)6039.7(31.6; 47.9)
 Health professionals5582.1(72.2; 92.0)2040.0(26.3; 53.7)2138.9(24.7; 52.8)
 Education professionals5066.7(55.3; 78.0)1938.8(25.0; 52.6)1530.0(16.3; 43.7)
 Students5676.7(66.3; 87.1)1734.7(21.2; 48.1)1119.6(8.3; 30.9)
P = 0.001P = 0.973P = 0.099

 16–30 years29472.4(67.9; 76.9)9434.8(29.1; 40.5)6722.9(17.9; 27.8)
 31–45 years25565.7(60.9; 70.6)11048.7(42.1; 55.2)11746.1(39.7; 52.4)
 46–60 years9468.6(60.5; 76.7)3236.4(26.2; 46.5)4547.4(36.8; 57.9)
 +60 years5185.0(75.1; 94.9)1532.6(18.9; 46.3)1224.0(11.2; 36.8)
P = 0.011P = 0.009P < 0.0001

Ethnic group
 Mandinka39497.8(96.2; 99.3)15944.8(39.6; 50.0)14436.6(61.8; 41.5)
 Wolof105.1(1.8; 8.5)333.3(0.6; 66.1)333.3(7.5; 70.1)
 Fula15389.0(84.0; 93.9)4834.0(26.2; 41.9)4932.0(24.3; 39.7)
 Serahule1083.3(51.6; 97.9)440.0(7.9; 72.1)440.0(12.2; 73.8)
 Djola95100(96.2; 100.0)2629.9(20.2; 39.6)3132.6(22.7; 42.6)
 Serer1017.2(6.7; 27.8)444.4(9.9; 78.9)330.0(6.7; 35.2)
P < 0.0001P = 0.093P = 0.910

 Muslim65172.5(69.5; 75.5)24240.8(36.8; 44.8)23135.6(31.8; 39.4)
 Christian927.3(10.6; 44.0)222.219.0
P < 0.0001P = 0.324P = 0.127

Marital status
 Married48369.1(65.6; 72.6)18842.9(38.3; 47.6)18939.3(34.8; 73.8)
 Single17572.9(67.1; 78.7)5132.5(25.1; 38.2)3721.1(14.8; 27.5)
P = 0.265P = 0.022P < 0.0001

To allow a better understanding of the results, the table only presents the percentage of men who answered “yes” to the question.
To allow a better understanding of the results, the table only presents the percentage of men who answered “0–3 years old” to the question.
Only answered if replied “yes” in Q1.

Q8. Do you know of any health consequences related to FGM/C?a Q9. Is FGM/C a mandatory practice by religion?a Q10. Is FGM/C equivalent to male circumcision?a
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI)

 Agriculture, livestock, and fishery sector12224.7(20.7; 28.6)19641.4(36.8; 45.9)17536.2(31.8; 40.5)
 Services sector4824.2(18.0; 30.5)10856.0(48.7; 63.2)9246.9(39.7; 54.2)
 Health professionals3146.3(33.6; 59.0)3047.6(34.5; 60.7)2639.4(26.8; 51.9)
 Education professionals3648.0(36.0; 60.0)3344.6(32.6; 56.6)2838.4(26.5; 50.2)
 Students1926.0(15.3; 36.8)3041.7(29.6; 53.7)2750.0(35.7; 64.3)
P < 0.001P = 0.011P = 0.081

 16–30 years11728.7(24.2; 33.3)17845.3(40.2; 50.3)16340.6(35.7; 45.6)
 31–45 years12231.5(26.8; 36.3)17045.1(39.9; 50.2)14237.4(32.4; 42.4)
 46–60 years3324.1(16.6; 31.6)6449.2(40.3; 58.2)5440.0(31.4; 48.6)
 +60 years815.4(4.6; 26.2)3153.4(39.7; 67.1)2949.2(35.5; 62.8)
P = 0.20P = 0.568P = 0.360

Ethnic group
 Mandinka9724.0(19.7; 28.3)28372.8(68.2; 77.3)23459.4(54.4; 64.4)
 Wolof9347.9(40.7; 55.2)94.7(1.5; 8.0)105.2(1.8; 8.5)
 Fula3319.2(13.0; 25.4)9356.0(48.2; 63.9)7443.8(36.0; 51.6)
 Serahule433.3(9.9; 65.1)975(42.8; 94.5)433.3(9.9; 65.1)
 Djola1616.8(8.8; 24.9)3236.4(25.7; 47.0)4447.3(36.6; 58.0)
 Serer1220.7(9.4; 32.0)610.3(1.6; 19.0)58.6(2.9; 19.0)
P < 0.0001P < 0.0001P < 0.0001

 Muslim25328.2(25.2; 31.2)42348.7(45.3; 52.1)36441.1(37.8; 44.4)
 Christian1133.3(15.7; 50.9)39.1(1.9; 24.3)618.8(7.2; 36.4)
P = 0.518P < 0.0001P = 0.011

Marital status
 Married19928.5(25.1; 31.9)31246.6(42.8; 50.5)27139.4(35.7; 43.2)
 Single6627.4(21.5; 33.2)10845.6(39.0; 52.1)9539.7(33.3; 46.2)
P = 0.378P = 0.777P = 0.934

To allow a better understanding of the results, the table only presents the percentage of men who answered “yes” to the question.

Q13. Do you think men have a role to play in preventing FGM/C?a Q15. If you have a daughter in the future, do you intend to circumcise her?a Q16. Do you think that the practice of FGM/C should continue?a
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI)

 Agriculture, livestock, and fishery sector25251.2(46.7; 55.7)27556.7(52.2; 61.2)28458.4(54.0; 62.9)
 Services sector9547.7(40.5; 54.9)13068.8(61.9; 75.7)13769.2(62.5; 75.9)
 Health professionals3857.6(44.9; 70.3)3863.3(50.3; 76.4)3859.4(46.6; 72.2)
 Education professionals4865.3(53.9; 76.8)4459.5(47.6; 71.3)4560.8(49.0; 72.6)
 Students3041.1(29.1; 53.1)4055.6(43.4; 67.7)4358.9(46.9; 70.9)

 16–30 years19247.3(42.3; 52.3)25363.4(58.6; 68.3)26265.0(60.2; 69.8)
 31–45 years21856.3(51.3; 61.4)21457.1(51.9; 62.2)21556.3(51.2; 61.4)
 46–60 years7051.1(42.4; 59.8)7862.4(53.5; 71.3)8966.4(58.0; 74.8)
 +60 years3050.8(37.2; 64.5)3864.4(51.3; 77.5)3966.1(53.2; 79.0)

Ethnic group
 Mandinka15137.5(32.6; 42.3)34288.4(85.0; 91.7)34587.1(83.7; 90.6)
 Wolof16383.6(78.1; 89.0)105.2(1.8; 8.6)189.2(4.9; 13.6)
 Fula7342.7(35.0; 50.4)12172.0(64.9; 79.1)12976.3(69.6; 83.0)
 Serahule541.7(15.2; 72.3)866.7(34.9; 90.1)763.6(30.8; 89.1)
 Djola3435.8(25.6; 46.0)7684.4(76.4; 92.5)7883.0(74.8; 91.1)
 Serer4680.7(69.6; 91.8)916.4(5.7; 27.1)1221.1(9.6; 32.5)

 Muslim44549.7(46.3; 53.0)55463.7(60.4; 66.9)57464.6(61.4; 67.8)
 Christian2575.6(59.6; 91.9)515.6(5.3; 32.8)618.2(7.0; 35.5)

Marital status
 Married36051.7(47.9; 55.4)40860.8(57.0; 64.6)41961.0(57.3; 64.7)
 Single12451.7(45.1; 58.2)14360.3(53.9; 66.8)15263.3(57.0; 69.6)

To allow a better understanding of the results, the table only presents the percentage of men who answered “yes” to the question.

Also with statistically significant differences, almost 60% of Mandinka consider FGM/C as equivalent to men’s circumcision, a parallelism that is established by 47.3% Djola, 43.8% Fula and 33.3% Serahule. Whilst 75% Serahule and 72.8% Mandinka believe that the practice is mandatory by Islam, only 56.0% Fula, and 36.4% Djola do so. Serer and Wolof, which are also Muslims but traditionally nonpracticing groups, do not establish a connection between the practice and Islam neither acknowledge a parallelism between FGM/C and male circumcision—indeed, around 95% of Wolof and 90% of Serer deny it ( ). Interesting but not statistically significant, men over 60 years old establish the relation between FGM/C and Islam and its equivalence with male circumcision in a higher percentage than other age groups.

In the overall sample, almost 72.0% of men do not know that FGM/C has a negative impact on the health and well-being of girls and women. The highest awareness is found among Wolof men (47.9%, ), health and education professionals (48.0% and 46.3%, ). Although not being a statistically significant trend, it is found that awareness of FGM/C health consequences decreases with age, with the lower levels being found among men over 60 years old (15.4%). Also interesting but not statistically significant is to find that the group of men between 31 and 45, who have the highest awareness of FGM/C health consequences, are also the less supportive of the practice, with a lower intention to have it performed on their daughters and the highest willingness of seeing men intervening in its prevention. The negative impact that the practice has on the health and welfare of girls and women is, indeed, the major reason given by 72.9% of those who, on the overall sample, are against its perpetuation.

This study also reveals that over 39.8% of girls are subjected to FGM/C before completing their fourth anniversary. This is mainly reported by men between 31 and 45, whilst men above 60 report the practice to occur when the girl child has already completed 4 years old (67.4%, ).

A minority of men take part in this decision-making process, especially if they are not married (married 39.3%, single 21.1%, ). Only 8.0% take the final decision towards subjecting their daughters to the practice, and 6.2% join the wives in this decision (Table 4). FGM/C appears mainly as a women’s choice (75.8%) or a decision of other relatives and community members (10.0%). Since there is no statistically significant association with the socio-demographic variables, this information is not shown in Table 4.

Q6. Who takes the final decision to practice FGM/C on your daughter?a

Both men and women416.2
Other relatives/community members6610.0


Only answered if replied “yes” in Q1.

Cluster 1 ( ; 65.1%) Cluster 2 ( ; 34.9%) Total sample ( )
% % %

 16–30 years27242.113538.940741.0
 31–45 years24037.214842.738839.1
 46–60 years9214.24613.313813.9
 +60 years426.5185.2606.0
 Agriculture, livestock, and fishery sector29547.020059.349551.3
 Services sector14623.35315.719920.6
 Health professionals497.8185.3677.0
 Education professionals457.2308.9757.8
Ethnic group
 Mandinka382 226.440441.2
 Wolof91.4186 19519.9
 Fula133 4011.717317.6
 Djola84 113.2959.7
 Serer91.449 585.9
 Muslim608 29291.590096.2
 Christian91.524 333.5
Marital status

Occurrence is significantly overrepresented in the given cluster than in the whole sample ( ).

Cluster Analysis. The cluster analysis revealed statistically significant differences for ethnicity and religious affiliation, allowing the identification of two profiles of respondents which are identified in Clusters 1 and 2 (Tables 5 and 6, and Figure 1).

Variable labelCharacteristic categoriesPercent of category in clusterPercent of category in sample

Cluster 1
 Q1. Is FGM/C practiced in your family/household?Yes99.770.0
 Q5. Do you take part in the decision making process on FGM/C?Yes37.025.7
 Q8. Do you know of any health consequences related to FGM/C?No82.971.4
 Q13. Do you think men have a role to play in preventing FGM/C?No68.848.4
 Q15. If you have a daughter in the future, do you intend to circumcise her?Yes92.560.7

Cluster 2
 Q1. Is FGM/C practiced in your family/household?No80.730.0
 Q5. Do you take part in the decision making process on FGM/C?No87.274.3
 Q8. Do you know of any health consequences related to FGM/C?Yes47.028.6
 Q13. Do you think men have a role to play in preventing FGM/C?Yes86.151.6
 Q15. If you have a daughter in the future, do you intend to circumcise her?No96.039.3

Cluster 1 is composed of those men who declare, on a rate statistically significant and higher than the overall sample, that FGM/C is practiced in their families/households (99.7% versus 67.4%); that they are involved in the decision making process (37.0% versus 25.6%); intend to have it performed on their own daughters (92.5% versus 60.9%); are not aware of the practice having health consequences (82.9% versus 71.7%); and do not think that men have a role to play in its prevention (68.8% versus 48.4%). This cluster comprises almost two-thirds of the overall sample (65.1%) and is overrepresented by men from Mandinka, Fula, Serahule, and Djola ethnic origins, with Muslim affiliation.

Cluster 2 comprises the remaining one-third of the total sample and is composed of those men whose knowledge, attitudes, and practices are opposite to the ones expressed by men in Cluster 1. This group gathers those who report, on a rate statistically significant and lower than the overall sample, that FGM/C is not practiced in their family/households (80.7% versus 30.0%); that they are not involved in the decision making process (87.2% versus 74.4%); do not intent to have it performed on their daughters (96.0% versus 39.1%); are aware that the practice has health consequences (47.0% versus 28.3%); and believe that men have a role to play in its prevention (86.1% versus 51.6%). In this group, Wolof and Serer ethnic origins are overrepresented, together with the Christian religion (7.5% versus 3.5%).

4. Discussion

Seen through men’s eyes, the secret world of women remains embedded in cloudy concepts shaped by culture in ethnic tradition, also influenced by religion. All ethnicities included in this study follow Islam, but each one of them establishes a different relation between FGM/C and religion. While those from traditionally practicing groups tend to consider the practice as a religious injunction or as “Sunna,” finding justification for its continuation, almost all those from traditionally nonpracticing groups deny that the practice is an obligation in Islam. FGM/C is, in fact, a pre-Islamic practice.

Even within traditionally practicing groups, perceptions diverge substantially. Mandinka found FGM/C on its mandatory character by Islam and are eager to consider it as equivalent to male circumcision. Serahule share the same religious conviction but do not establish the equivalence with the male practice, in opposition to Djola, for whom religion does not seem to be significant but the parallelism with male circumcision is more evident. Although sharing the same nationality and religion, ethnic identities are built up on different cultural values and social norms, which are the decisive shaping factors of men’s concept of the practice. Ethnicity’s power to influence the knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to FGM/C had already been shown in a previous study conducted with Gambian health care professionals, by the same authors of this paper [22].

Amongst older men, FGM/C is seen as a mandatory practice by religion, equivalent to male circumcision, with no health consequences. But a window of opportunity for change is found among younger generations. Men between 31 and 45 are the less supportive towards the practice, have the lowest intention to have it performed on their daughters and the highest willingness to play a role in its prevention, and are also the group more aware of FGM/C health consequences. Can this increased knowledge and less supportive attitudes be linked, and on this foundation built on a strategy for prevention? This and other findings from this study suggest that it can. Indeed, among the group of men who are against the continuation of the practice, health consequences are presented as the major reason to stop its continuation. Health and education professionals, who are the ones more aware of FGM/C health consequences, show more willingness to participate in prevention.

The fact that the majority of men are not active in the decision making process concerning the practice does not mean that they do not have the power to influence it. The finding that 60.7% of men intend to have FGM/C performed on their daughters in the future, but only 34.8% actually participate in the decision-making process and a few 14.2% take the final decision, alone (8.0%) or with their wives (6.2%), suggests that decision-making is not a simple one-way process. Indeed, field work evidence reveals that women who decide that their daughters will not undergo the practice face, not only peer pressure, but also feelings of helplessness when not actively supported by their husbands, as well as other influential male leaders from their communities. In a patriarchal society, although men might not be actively participating in FGM/C decision making process, they are still decision-makers.

The finding that decisions concerning FGM/C can be made by multiple actors including women, men, relatives, and community members corroborates the results achieved by Shell-Duncan et al. in a study recently conducted in The Gambia and Senegal [14]. These authors explain that the multiplicity of decision makers and peer pressure among women makes individuals less able to act upon intentions to carry on with the practice or not. In the secret world of women, avoiding discrimination is a powerful motif to perpetuate FGM/C, and this social force must be acknowledged. However, men’s power to influence it should also not be disregarded.

Over the past generation, FGM/C practices have changed in many ways in Gambian societies. The group ritual in the “bush” is giving place to individual ceremonies behind doors [14]. Field experience reveals that the traditional knife, used to perform FGM/C on a number of girls without being sterilized, is being replaced with individual razor blades, as a result of HIV/AIDS awareness campaigns. Similarly, traditional herbs and charms, used to manage bleeding, relief pain and accelerate the healing process, are being complemented with modern drugs. Nowadays some babies and girls are taken to health facilities when health complications cannot be managed at community level, in opposition to the secrecy that characterized the seclusion period in the past. Sometimes, FGM/C is even performed by health professionals themselves: medicalization is already a reality in the country [22]. Finally, the age at which the practice is performed is declining—our study reveals that over 40% of Gambian girls are subjected to FGM/C before celebrating their fourth anniversary. This reduction may be explained by the belief that wounds heal faster and pain is lower for babies than for grown-up girls.

This paper suggests that new actors can be called on stage to play an important role in FGM/C prevention. May knowledge be shared and synergies be built up, in order to promote positive changes that lead to the abandonment of the practice.

5. Conclusions

Although sharing the same religious beliefs, men from traditionally and nontraditionally practicing groups see the relation between the practice and Islam in different ways and have diverse perceptions of its parallelism with male circumcision. Differences are also significant within traditionally practicing groups, showing how ethnic identities are the decisive shaping factors on how men conceive and value FGM/C.

The decision to subject or not a girl to the practice appears as the result of a complex process involving multiple actors. Although few men are active participants in this process, their intention to have FGM/C performed on their daughters is likely to influence it. The support towards the practice is highly dependent on ethnic identity, being much higher among men from traditionally practicing groups. However, awareness on FGM/C health complications is prone to positively influence men’s willingness to play a role in its prevention. In this line of thought, a strategy of acknowledging men’s ethnic background and focusing on increasing their understanding of FGM/C negative impact on health might well be an effective way to influence and promote a positive change to the secret world of women.


This study was made possible by a close collaboration with the tutors and students of the School for Enrolled Community Health Nurses and Midwives at Mansakonko. They are all thankfully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the Fundació “La Caixa”, Diputación Foral de Álava, and Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID), for funding the project. They also want to thank the NGO Wassu The Gambia Kafo for the support provided. Finally, a special mention must be made to all Gambian men who accepted to participate in this study. To all of them, the most respectful and thankful acknowledgement is presented.


  1. World Health Organization, Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: An Interagency Statement. OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241596442_eng.pdf.
  2. F. O. Dare, V. O. Oboro, S. O. Fadiora, E. O. Orji, A. O. Sule-Odu, and T. O. Olabode, “Female genital mutilation: an analysis of 522 cases in South-Western Nigeria,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 281–283, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Behrendt and S. Moritz, “Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1000–1002, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. A. Alsibiani and A. A. Rouzi, “Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 722–724, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Morison, C. Scherf, G. Ekpo et al., “The long-term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community-based survey,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 643–653, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. World Health Organization Study Group on Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcome, “Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries,” The Lancet, vol. 367, no. 925, pp. 1835–1841, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Chibber, E. El-Saleh, and J. El Harmi, “Female circumcision: obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century,” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 833–836, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Kaplan, From Senegambia to Catalonia: Acculturation and Social Integration Process, Fundación La Caixa, Barcelona, Spain, 1998.
  9. A. J. Gage and R. van Rossem, “Attitudes toward the discontinuation of female genital cutting among men and women in Guinea,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. United Nations Children’s Fund, The Dynamics of Social Change Towards the Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Five African Countries, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy, 2010, http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/fgm_insight_eng.pdf.
  11. Gambia Bureau of Statistics, “The Gambia multiple indicator cluster survey,” Tech. Rep., UNICEF, Banjul, Gambia, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. Kaplan, S. Hechavarría, M. Martín, and I. Bonhoure, “Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action,” Reproductive Health, vol. 8, no. 1, article 26, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Kaplan, M. Forbes, I. Bonhoure et al., “Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in The Gambia: long-term health consequences and complications during delivery and for the newborn,” International Journal of Women’s Health, vol. 5, pp. 323–331, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. Shell-Duncan, K. Wander, Y. Hernlund, and A. Moreau, “Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: testing predictions of social convention theory,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 73, no. 8, pp. 1275–1283, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Johnsdotter, “Projected cultural histories of the cutting of female genitalia: a poor reflection as in a mirror,” History and Anthropology, no. 1, pp. 91–114, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  16. World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Male Circumcision: Global Trends and Determinants of Prevalence, Safety and Acceptability, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  17. Government of The Gambia, A Situational Analysis on Female Genital Mutilation in the Gambia, WHO, Banjul, Gambia, 1999.
  18. I. O. Ogunlola, E. O. Orji, and A. T. Owolabi, “Female genital mutilation and the unborn female child in southwest Nigeria,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 143–145, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Abdalla, A. Omer, and K. Elmusharaf, “Female genital mutilation in Sudan: what do men think?” Contraceptions, vol. 85, no. 3, article 317, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. Sakeah, A. Beke, H. V. Doctor, and A. V. Hodgson, “Males' preference for circumcised women in northern Ghana,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  21. V. Berggren, S. Musa Ahmed, Y. Hernlund, E. Johansson, B. Habbani, and A. K. Edberg, “Being victims or beneficiaries? Perspectives on female genital cutting and reinfibulation in Sudan,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 24–36, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Kaplan, S. Hechavarría, M. Bernal, and I. Bonhoure, “Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding FGM/C among rural Gambian health care professionals: a transcultural study,” BMC Public Health. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Gambia Bureau of Statistics (GBoS), The Gambia Atlas of 2003 Population and Housing Census, Gambia Bureau of Statistics, Banjul, Gambia, 2006.

Copyright © 2013 Adriana Kaplan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.