Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Volume 2014, Article ID 581783, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581783
Review Article

Current Status of Comprehensive Chromosome Screening for Elective Single-Embryo Transfer

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 10002, Taiwan

Received 10 January 2014; Accepted 12 May 2014; Published 1 June 2014

Academic Editor: Curt W. Burger

Copyright © 2014 Ming-Yih Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. L. Steinberg, S. Boulet, D. Kissin, L. Warner, and D. J. Jamieson, “Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome—United States, 1999 to 2010,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1937–1943, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Maheshwari, S. Griffiths, and S. Bhattacharya, “Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Ooki, “Theoretical model of the relationship between single embryo transfer rate and multiple pregnancy rate in Japan,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2012, Article ID 620753, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. J. Heitmann, M. J. Hill, K. S. Richter, A. H. DeCherney, and E. A. Widra, “The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 563–567, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Seli, C. G. Vergouw, H. Morita et al., “Noninvasive metabolomic profiling as an adjunct to morphology for noninvasive embryo assessment in women undergoing single embryo transfer,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 535–542, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. G. Katz-Jaffe, S. McReynolds, D. K. Gardner, and W. B. Schoolcraft, “The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 271–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. McReynolds, L. Vanderlinden, J. Stevens, K. Hansen, W. B. Schoolcraft, and M. G. Katz-Jaffe, “Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2631–2633, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Lédée, V. Gridelet, S. Ravet et al., “Impact of follicular G-CSF quantification on subsequent embryo transfer decisions: a proof of concept study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 406–413, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Wathlet, T. Adriaenssens, I. Segers et al., “Pregnancy prediction in single embryo transfer cycles after ICSI using QPCR: validation in oocytes from the same cohort,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e54226, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. M. Rosenbluth, D. N. Shelton, A. E. T. Sparks, E. Devor, L. Christenson, and B. J. van Voorhis, “MicroRNA expression in the human blastocyst,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 855–861.e3, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. R. Angell, R. J. Aitken, P. F. A. van Look, M. A. Lumsden, and A. A. Templeton, “Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos after in vitro fertilization,” Nature, vol. 303, no. 5915, pp. 336–338, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. H. Handyside, “24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 595–602, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Niinimäki, A.-M. Suikkari, S. Mäkinen, V. Söderström-Anttila, and H. Martikainen, “Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40–44 years,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 331–335, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. L. Haadsma, H. Groen, T. M. Mooij et al., “Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 191–200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Franasiak, E. J. Forman, K. H. Hong et al., “The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15, 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 656–663.e1, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Gutiérrez-Mateo, J. Benet, H. Starke et al., “Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenM-FISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3395–3401, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, J. van Echten-Arends et al., “In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Mertzanidou, L. Wilton, J. Cheng et al., “Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 256–264, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. E. Northrop, N. R. Treff, B. Levy, and R. T. Scott Jr., “SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 590–600, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Kallioniemi, O.-P. Kallioniemi, D. Sudar et al., “Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors,” Science, vol. 258, no. 5083, pp. 818–821, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y.-L. Chen, C.-C. Hung, S.-Y. Lin et al., “Successful application of the strategy of blastocyst biopsy, vitrification, whole genome amplification, and thawed embryo transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1,” Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 74–78, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. R. Treff, J. Su, X. Tao, L. E. Northrop, and R. T. Scott, “Single-cell whole-genome amplification technique impacts the accuracy of SNP microarray-based genotyping and copy number analyses,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 335–343, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Wells, J. K. Sherlock, A. H. Handyside, and J. D. A. Delhanty, “Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1214–1218, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Wilton, R. Williamson, J. Mcbain, D. Edgar, and L. Voullaire, “Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 345, no. 21, pp. 1537–1541, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Rius, G. Daina, A. Obradors et al., “Comprehensive embryo analysis of advanced maternal age-related aneuploidies and mosaicism by short comparative genomic hybridization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 413–416, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Rius, A. Obradors, G. Daina et al., “Detection of unbalanced chromosome segregations in preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations by short comparative genomic hibridization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 134–142, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. G. Hu, G. Webb, and N. Hussey, “Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 283–289, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Guo, Q. Sheng, D. C. Samuels et al., “Comparative study of exome copy number variation estimation tools using array comparative genomic hybridization as control,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 915636, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Gutiérrez-Mateo, P. Colls, J. Sánchez-García et al., “Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 953–958, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Alfarawati, E. Fragouli, P. Colls, and D. Wells, “First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1560–1574, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. D. Keltz, M. Vega, I. Sirota et al., “Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) with Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1333–1339, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. L. Harton, S. Munne, M. Surrey et al., “Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 1695–1703, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Cohen, D. Wells, and S. Munne, “Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 496–503, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C.-C. Huang, L.-J. Chang, Y.-Y. Tsai et al., “An feasible strategy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers with chromosomal translocation: using blastocyst biopsy and array comparative genomic hybridization,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 537–544, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Daser, M. Thangavelu, R. Pannell et al., “Interrogation of genomes by molecular copy-number counting (MCC),” Nature Methods, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 447–453, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. I. Evans, D. A. Wright, E. Pergament, H. S. Cuckle, and K. H. Nicolaides, “Digital PCR for noninvasive detection of aneuploidy: power analysis equations for feasibility,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 244–247, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. J. Hindson, K. D. Ness, D. A. Masquelier et al., “High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, no. 22, pp. 8604–8610, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. Belgrader, S. C. Tanner, J. F. Regan, R. Koehler, B. J. Hindson, and A. S. Brown, “Droplet digital PCR measurement of HER2 copy number alteration in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissue,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 991–994, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. R. Treff, J. Su, X. Tao, B. Levy, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 2017–2021, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. R. Treff, B. Levy, J. Su, L. E. Northrop, X. Tao, and R. T. Scott Jr., “SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 583–589, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. T. Scott Jr., K. Ferry, J. Su, X. Tao, K. Scott, and N. R. Treff, “Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 870–875, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. B. Schoolcraft, N. R. Treff, J. M. Stevens, K. Ferry, M. Katz-Jaffe, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 638–640, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. N. R. Treff, L. E. Northrop, K. Kasabwala, J. Su, B. Levy, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 1606–1612.e2, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Y.-Q. Tan, K. Tan, S.-P. Zhang et al., “Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2581–2592, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Rabinowitz, A. Ryan, G. Gemelos et al., “Origins and rates of aneuploidy in human blastomeres,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 395–401, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. N. R. Treff, X. Tao, K. M. Ferry, J. Su, D. Taylor, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 819–824.e2, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. J. Forman, X. Tao, K. M. Ferry, D. Taylor, N. R. Treff, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Single embryo transfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improved ongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates,” Human Reproduction, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1217–1222, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. E. J. Forman, K. M. Upham, M. Cheng et al., “Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 718–724, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. Genomes Project, G. R. Abecasis, A. Auton et al., “An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes,” Nature, vol. 491, no. 7422, pp. 56–65, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. C. J. Bell, D. L. Dinwiddie, N. A. Miller et al., “Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 3, no. 65, Article ID 65ra64, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. X. Yin, K. Tan, G. Vajta et al., “Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 88, no. 3, article 69, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. R. Treff, A. Fedick, X. Tao, B. Devkota, D. Taylor, and R. T. Scott Jr., “Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1377–1384.e6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. W. B. Schoolcraft and M. G. Katz-Jaffe, “Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 615–619, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. L.-J. Chang, C.-C. Huang, Y.-Y. Tsai et al., “Blastocyst biopsy and vitrification are effective for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1435–1444, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus