Obstetrics and Gynecology International

Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 783289 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783289

Phyllis C. Leppert, Friederike L. Jayes, James H. Segars, "The Extracellular Matrix Contributes to Mechanotransduction in Uterine Fibroids", Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2014, Article ID 783289, 12 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783289

The Extracellular Matrix Contributes to Mechanotransduction in Uterine Fibroids

Academic Editor: Peter E. Schwartz
Received21 Jan 2014
Revised28 May 2014
Accepted11 Jun 2014
Published03 Jul 2014


The role of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and mechanotransduction as an important signaling factor in the human uterus is just beginning to be appreciated. The ECM is not only the substance that surrounds cells, but ECM stiffness will either compress cells or stretch them resulting in signals converted into chemical changes within the cell, depending on the amount of collagen, cross-linking, and hydration, as well as other ECM components. In this review we present evidence that the stiffness of fibroid tissue has a direct effect on the growth of the tumor through the induction of fibrosis. Fibrosis has two characteristics: (1) resistance to apoptosis leading to the persistence of cells and (2) secretion of collagen and other components of the ECM such a proteoglycans by those cells leading to abundant disposition of highly cross-linked, disoriented, and often widely dispersed collagen fibrils. Fibrosis affects cell growth by mechanotransduction, the dynamic signaling system whereby mechanical forces initiate chemical signaling in cells. Data indicate that the structurally disordered and abnormally formed ECM of uterine fibroids contributes to fibroid formation and growth. An appreciation of the critical role of ECM stiffness to fibroid growth may lead to new strategies for treatment of this common disease.

1. Introduction

Uterine fibroids are firm, stiff nodular tumors, a fact understood by all clinicians and confirmed by biomechanical studies (as discussed in [13]). The proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly the interstitial collagens are responsible for this property of “firmness” and for the mechanical strength of the tissue. In biomechanical terms this property is referred to as stiffness. Fibroids feature an accumulation of altered collagen and differing amounts of glycosaminoglycans along with proliferation of cells, which is by definition fibrosis. A complete understanding of the role of the ECM proteins, especially collagen, and their effect on growth and development of fibroids must take into account the process of mechanotransduction, a dynamic system whereby mechanical forces initiate chemical signaling within cells. This bidirectional process is promoted by the stiffness of the ECM and initiates cell-matrix interactions in a progressive, ever changing process leading to activation of signaling cascades. While soluble signaling molecules have long been recognized as important factors in fibroid growth, development, differentiation, and function, mechanical signaling has only more recently been shown to play a critical role.

Here we focus on the ECM and the properties of cell and tissue stiffness that lead to signal transduction and then review current knowledge regarding the ECM of uterine fibroids. This information is placed in the context of the modern appreciation of how the ECM functions in other tissues and organs and the contemporary understanding of mechanotransduction. It is universally accepted that a myriad of chemical signaling molecules has been identified in fibroids and that reproductive tract hormones regulate the complex systems leading to fibroid development and growth. These chemical and hormonal signals are part of the biological mechanism of the development of these tumors, but these signals alone do not fully account for fibroid development and growth. We provide evidence in this review to suggest that mechanical force contributes to the triggering of these signaling pathways and plays a major role in the pathobiology of uterine fibroids.

2. Mechanotransduction: A Mechanism of Disease

Individual cells are capable of translating mechanical stimuli such as stretch or compression from their environment into biochemical signals through a complex system of cytoskeletal ECM receptors and transmembrane molecules that interconnect with integrin subunits and cell surface proteoglycans (as discussed in [4]). The highly dynamic mechanotransduction process is defined as cooperative signaling between the cell and the ECM. It has been suggested that this mechanotransduction system would be able to transfer signals through the entire cell and therefore would be more rapid than the diffusion based system (discussed in [4]). In response to mechanical force in living tissue there is a reciprocal or “back and forth” activity where extracellular remodeling, rapid transient cell-cell, and cell-matrix interactions all have essential functions (as discussed in [5, 6]). This interaction occurs between one cell and its extracellular matrix as well as between many cells and the matrix within tissues. Mechanical force is an upstream signal and will initiate physiological processes such as those in development and disease states. Recent studies show that ECM collagen provides a dynamic role in the breast cell microenvironment and is actually active in the promotion of tumor progression (as discussed by [7]). Increased ECM stiffness generated by collagen regulates breast epithelial signaling through integrin activation of β-catenin and MYC (a transcription factor persistently expressed in cancers, so named because it is similar to the myelocytomatosis viral oncogene) to activate the microRNA-18a expression that drives breast tumor progression (as discussed by [8]). This tumor progression is induced by MiRna reduction of tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) by the reduction of homoebox A9 (HOXA9) (as discussed by [8]). Mechanotransduction can be altered by mutations in downstream signaling cascades. Abnormal mechanical signaling as a result of modifications in these interactions or cellular sensitivity to mechanical stress contributes to disease development (as discussed in [6]). The molecules in the cell-ECM network appear to be linked mechanically from the ECM to the cytoskeleton (Figure 1). Intriguingly, recent work has indicated a system linked from the ECM through the cytoskeleton to the nucleus (as reported in [9]).

While the cell’s membrane receptors, especially integrins, allow the transmission of mechanical signals across the cell surface, change in the ECM structure and the amount within the microenvironment are the sources of the mechanical forces. This dynamic relationship is noted in the disease process of fibrosis. The formation of fibrosis correlates with new collagen deposition and TGF-beta-induced myofibroblast differentiation, as well as elastin gene expression, WNT-1 inducible signaling pathway protein-1, lysyl oxidase, and type V collagen gene expression (as discussed in [10]). In addition there is often the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans as well as resistance to apoptosis in fibrotic tissue (as discussed in [11] and references therein). Fibrosis occurs when there is a hyperproduction of collagen and lack of appropriate remodeling and degradation. The increased accumulation of the ECM observed in fibrotic tissue causes stiffness in the microenvironment of the individual cells in tissues and organs and contributes to mechanotransduction (as discussed in [4, 8]). While the individual cell contributes in this dynamic process and changes within it cause signals to the ECM, this review is focused on the ECM and its functions. As the ECM accumulates additional mechanical force is produced by the ECM. To complete the picture, the role of extracellular fluid (ECF) in the generation of intrinsic mechanical force is now accepted (as discussed in [11]). Conformational changes in proteins that are mechanosensitive are sensed by the cells and open membrane channels, alter binding affinities, and increase phosphorylation thus activating downstream signaling pathways. Although the specific pathways of mechanotransduction have not been completely elucidated in uterine myometrial or fibroid cells, it is reasonable to suggest that mechanical signaling pathways exist in these cells as they do in the cells of tissues studied so far.

The ECM is able to initiate the mechanotransduction process and actually serves as a reservoir for matricellular proteins, growth factors, and cytokines. Often, activation of these factors occurs in the ECM. For example, TGF is activated in the ECM by a very complex mechanism. The ECM is able to transmit physical and chemical signals to the cell membrane leading to signal propagation and amplification via a multiplex array of intracellular signals. Specifically, the Rho/ROCK/MAPK signaling pathway is one important pathway in mechanotransduction (Figure 2). RhoA belongs to a family of small GTP-binding proteins. Both RhoA and Rho-kinase (ROCK), a downstream target of Rho, are involved in the regulation of a wide variety of cellular processes, including changes in cell motility and morphology, focal adhesion formation, and light chain phosphorylation (as discussed in [12]). An important concept is that reciprocity is an indispensable quality of mechanosensitive cells. Cells respond to biophysical and biochemical cues from the ECM, but cells also help maintain and remodel the ECM through secretion of various ECM components and the molecules that degrade the ECM. Thus, ECM remodeling will produce a matrix that can be either flexible or stiff depending on protein cross-links, content of glycoproteins, hydration, and other components of the ECM.

Mechanotransduction has long been viewed as a mechanism of disease (as discussed in [13]).

Mechanical signaling has been well described in dermal wounds and has also been studied in other tissues such as blood vessels, stem cells, respiratory epithelium, and musculoskeletal tissues. Notably, the reproductive system is dynamic and constantly undergoes extensive structural remodeling throughout each reproductive cycle—featuring a remarkable plasticity of the ECM. This remodeling is achieved, in part, by changes in the ECM, which are regulated by cyclic hormonal cues as well as cytokines and growth factors. Mechanotransduction is highly reciprocal and involves extensive bidirectional signals from the ECM to and from the cell (as presented and discussed in [14]).

3. Extracellular Matrix in the Human Uterus

Appreciation of the complexities of the ECM is essential to the understanding of the fibrotic process and its role in mechanotransduction in the human uterus. The uterine myometrium consists mainly of smooth muscle cells that stain positive for α smooth muscle actin and desmin and are interspersed with interstitial collagens. These collagens are large rigid molecules that are responsible for the mechanical strength of uterine tissue as well as all other tissues in the body. Histological examination demonstrates a basketweave pattern of the smooth muscle cells and the interstitial collagens (as discussed in [15, 16]). Notably, myometrium is a complex tissue and heterogeneous in the proportion of tissue stained by Masson Trichrome, a collagen stain (as discussed in [17]). Trichrome staining of tissue, however, will not differentiate between the numerous types of human interstitial collagens. At the ultrastructural level the interstitial collagen fibrils are observed in parallel to the smooth muscle cells, a feature which allows the uterus to maintain its strength as it expands during pregnancy (as discussed in [18]). The collagen superfamily of proteins is complex in molecular organization and is distributed widely in tissues and diverse in function (as discussed by [19]). Twenty-nine types of collagens encoded by numerous genes located on different chromosomes are known in humans.

The predominate collagens found in the interstitial areas of the myometrium are Type I, Type III, and Type V, although types IV and VI are also present in the uterus (as discussed in [2024]). Type IV collagen is membrane collagen, arrayed as a meshwork (as discussed in [25]). All collagens have three polypeptide chains and have tandem repeated Gly-Xaa-Yaa sequences, where X is proline and Y is hydroxyproline. These peptide chains are able to assemble into stable triple helical structures. Glycine is the smallest amino acid and its location in the collagen molecule allows for a tightly coiled helix as glycine is easily “packed” into the center of the assembled helix. The hydroxyprolines are located on the outside of the triple helix stabilizing the molecule. Three alpha chains make up a collagen molecule. As examples, Type I, the most abundant collagen type in the human body is made up of chains encoded by the genes COL1A1 and COL1A2. COL1A1 gene produces the pro-alpha 1 (I) chain and the COL1A2 gene produces the pro-alpha 2(I) chain. Two pro-alpha 1 chains and one pro-alpha 2 chain form type 1 procollagen. Type III collagen consists of three alpha 1(III) chains encoded by COL3A1. Type IV collagen consists of two alpha 1 IV chains and one alpha 2 IV chain and is the type of collagen found in membranes, blood vessels, and nerves (as discussed in [26]).

The biosynthesis of collagen is complicated. Therefore, gene expression studies alone do not reflect the abundance of native, cross-linked collagen in tissue. In general, collagen synthesis includes extensive co- and posttranslational modifications that stabilize the helix and assist with higher order molecular assembly (shown below) (as discussed in [26]).

Synthesis of Type I Collagen: An Interstitial Collagen.(1)COL1A1 gene →pro-alpha1 (I) chain,COL1A2 gene → pro-alpha2 (I) chain,(2)in ER → preprocollagen,(3)ER Lumen → signal peptides cleaved; proline and lysine hydroxylation,  2 pro-alpha1 and 1 pro-alpha2 chains → Type I procollagen, triple helix formed →(4)in Golgi packaged and secreted →(5)outside cell propeptides cleaved → tropocollagenfibrils formed,(6)lysyl oxidase creates intramolecular and intermolecular cross-links.

In the above list synthesis of Type I collagen is described. Other interstitial collagens, such as Type III and Type V, are synthesized in a similar manner.

Briefly, the genes are transcribed and their mRNAs are processed similarly to other molecules. Then the peptide chains are translated in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). These peptide chains are known as preprocollagen and have a signal peptide and propeptides on each end. The signal peptide is cleaved to form pro-alpha chains. In the lumen of the RER, hydroxylation of the proline and lysine amino acids occurs, a step dependent on ascorbic acid (vitamin C) (as discussed in [26]). Specific hydroxylysine residues are glycosylated and the triple helical structure as noted is formed from two alpha-1 chains and one alpha-2 chain. This assembly is assisted by disulfide bonding between the chains (as discussed in [27]). The procollagen molecule has an N-terminal propeptide, the central helix, and a C-propeptide region (as discussed in [28]). This tight triple helix ensures that this part of the molecule is inaccessible to modifying enzymes and the propeptides prevent fibril formation inside the cell. Next, the procollagen moves to the Golgi where it is packaged and secreted (as discussed in [26]).

Once outside the cell, the collagen propeptides are cleaved in the extracellular space and tropocollagen is formed by the enzymatic action of procollagen peptidase (as discussed in [29]). In the case of Types I and III collagens, the tropocollagen molecules spontaneously form fibrils by the alignment of charged and hydrophobic amino acid clusters (as discussed in [30]). These fibrils are laid down in a staggered fashion such that a d-band of alternating regions of protein density in the fibril produces a characteristic gap and overlap appearance of negatively contrasted fibrils observed in transmission electron microscopy (as discussed in [31]). Finally in the extracellular space copper-dependent lysyl oxidase (LOX) enzymatically creates the intramolecular and intermolecular cross-links that form the mature collagen fibrils (as discussed in [32, 33]). These covalent cross-links are di-, tri-, and tetrafunctional and further stabilize the collagen helix (as discussed in [34]). The more lysine derived cross-links in collagenous tissue, the stiffer the tissue. In some tissues Type I and Type III collagen molecules are present within the same collagen fibril, covalently bound between the N-terminal regions (as discussed in [35]). In liver fibrosis Types I and III collagens colocalize in collagen fibers (as discussed in [36]) and while this has not been studied in the uterine fibrosis this type of fiber could be a possibility in that situation. However, in most tissues the collagen fibrils consist of all Type I collagen molecules or all Type III collagen molecules with tissues characterized by specific Type I/Type III ratios. In pathological situations cells are capable of altering this ratio. For instance, in healing wounds there is an increase in Type III collagen and in some situations an increase in Type V collagen as well.

Other major components of the uterine ECM are proteoglycans which are glycoproteins that contain a core protein with covalently attached high negatively charged glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains. GAGs are sulfated polysaccharides that contain repeating disaccharides (as discussed in [26]). There is one exception and that is hyaluronic acid. It is not attached to a protein core and it is not sulfated (as discussed in [26, 37]). The disaccharides are unique to each proteoglycan. Glucuronic acid-N-acetylgalactosamines are components of chondroitin sulfate; iduronic acid-N-acetylgalactosamines are units of dermatan sulfate; heparin contains glucuronic acid-N-acetylglucosamines and heparan sulfate contains glucuronic acid-N-acetylglucosamines. Keratan sulfate is the one glycosaminoglycan that does not contain uronic acid; it contains N-acetylglucosamine-galactose (as discussed in [26]). Proteoglycan synthesis begins with the core protein which is then modified in the RER. After this monosaccharides and sulfate, the building blocks for the GAGs are taken up by the cell through specialized transporters in the plasma membrane (as discussed in [36]). These molecules are activated in the cytosol to form UDP-sugars and 5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) and transported to the Golgi (as discussed in [37]). In the Golgi, the monosaccharides (xylosyl-, galactosyl-galactosyl-uronic acid) and the linker tetrasaccharide are attached to the core protein at selected serine residues, and additional disaccharides are attached to the proteoglycan. The addition of a fifth saccharide then determines if the GAG chain will become chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate, or heparan sulfate or heparin (as discussed in [37]). Heparan sulfate and heparin undergo even more complex modification. When polymerization is finished, O-sulfation occurs. This modification is different depending on the proteoglycan (as discussed in [37]). Proteoglycans attract cations and bind water enabling tissues to accommodate to pressure changes. Proteoglycans also play important roles in the control of cell growth and differentiation. The small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan decorin, a member of the small leucine-rich repeat class of proteins (SLRP) through its interaction with collagen, may aid in the adaption of tissue to increased mechanical loads (force) (as discussed in [38]). Decorin interacts with specific regions of the collagen fibrils and regulates their formation (as discussed by [3942]). Decorin and collagen colocalize in both myometrium and fibroids indicating this interaction may be present in the uterus (as discussed in [43]). Larger and longer GAGs of the side chains on the decorin molecule most likely exert higher osmotic pressure and thus affect both ECM organization and matrix-cell interaction. Decorin has been studied in the uterine cervix and appears to have a role in the cervical changes of gestation and parturition by interaction with collagen fibers (as discussed by [4446]). Hyaluronan becomes dominant at term cervix in mice and women and contributes to the loss of tensile strength of the cervix during parturition (as discussed in [47, 48]). Hyalectans, another family of ECM proteoglycans, interact with hyaluronic acid and are very important in the regulation of water retention and distribution in tissue. One member of this family is versican, a protein glycosylated with galactosaminoglycan side chains and which is increased in tumors compared to normal tissue (as discussed in [49, 50]).

In addition to collagen and glycosaminoglycans, elastin, a hydrophobic ECM protein is an important component of the uterus. Elastin is responsible for the ability of tissue to stretch and recoil and is a hydrophobic protein with a complex synthesis (as discussed in [51]). Elastin is found in the uterus in fibrils and thin sheets from 0.1 to 0.4 microns in thickness that are capable of multidimensional stretch, in contrast to the elastin lamellae found in the aorta which are 1 to 2.5 microns in thickness and stretch in one dimension (as discussed in [52]). The uterine elastin is so thin that elastic fibers are often not seen in histological sections of nonpathological conditions (as discussed in [52]). During pregnancy, elastin allows the uterus to achieve its remarkable increase in size, to stretch, and to accommodate the growing fetus.

Mechanical force is transmitted across the cell membrane by integrins, transmembrane receptors expressed in all cells. These surface molecules are important in both cell to matrix (inside out) and ECM to cell signaling (outside in) and act as mechanosensors generating signals that affect cell physiology and pathology by complex mechanisms (as discussed in [53, 54]). Integrins are heterodimers consisting of an alpha subunit and a beta subunit and are involved in numerous processes such as adhesion, ECM organization, signaling, cell survival, proliferation, and in mechanotransduction (as discussed in [55]). Although there are multiple integrins that bind to many proteins, only those pertinent to this review are mentioned here. The references cited discuss many additional integrins and their functions. There are four collagen-binding integrins in the β1 subfamily, namely, α1β1, α2β1, α10β1, and α11β1 (as discussed in [53]). Three of these collagen binding integrins have been demonstrated to be present in fibroids as well as in the myometrium and in the cervix (as discussed in [5659]). Integrins binding to fibronectin, α3β1, α4β1, α5β1, αvβ1, and αvβ3 and to laminin, α1β1, α3β1, α6β1, and αvβ3 are also expressed in myometrium (as described by [57]). The integrin subunit β1 is expressed in myometrium and in uterine fibroids (as discussed in [57, 60]). Fibronectin, an ECM molecule with multiple functions mediates the assembly of the matrix binding collagen, integrins, and other ECM molecules by undergoing a series of conformational changes that expose cryptic binding sites (as discussed in [61]). Mechanical forces are capable of inducing further conformational changes in fibronectin thus mediating multiple effects on ECM and cell and tissue functions (as discussed in [62]). Thus fibronectin is an organizer of matrix assembly (as discussed by [53, 60]).

The turnover and degradation of the ECM is also complex. Humans are considered to have 23, or as some suggest, up to 28 matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade both matrix and nonmatrix proteins and are important in tissue repair and remodeling (as discussed in [6365]). These enzymes break down cell-surface and ECM molecules that alter cell-matrix or cell-cell interactions and also release growth factors not related to the degradation of collagen or other matrix molecules including proteoglycans (as discussed in [64]). MMPs play roles also in cell migration, growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and inflammatory responses (as discussed in [65]). All MMPs utilize Zn2+ ion linked to their catalytic site to hydrolyze specific peptide substrates. After secretion MMPs must be activated by protein cleavage. For example, ProMMP-1 is activated by cleavage of its propeptide by MMP-3 (as discussed in [66]). MMP-1 binds to and locally unwinds the triple helix before it hydrolyses the collagen molecule into 2 fragments (as discussed in [67]). MMPs are inhibited by tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) and α2-macroglobulin. Thus MMPs are regulated in several ways: during gene expression, by the need for activation of latent proenzymes and by being bound to inhibitory molecules. This equilibrium between activation and inhibition is delicate and results in situations where a particular signal may regulate an MMP in the direction of activation but will regulate another MMP by inhibition (as discussed by [68]). The regulation of TIMPs in some situations can be hormone-dependent (as discussed by [68]). Demonstration of the presence of MMP mRNA or protein in a particular tissue, however, does not prove how MMP is functioning in that tissue (as discussed by [64, 68]). Recent compelling studies demonstrate that vitamin D inhibits the nuclear factor-κβ (NF-κβ) pathway directly regulating genes that contribute to cell proliferation, inflammation, fibrogenesis, increased oxidative stress, and decreased MMP-9 (as discussed by [69]). Experiments in rats showed that vitamin D reduced ECM deposition in induced liver fibrosis and lowered the fibrotic score in the animals (as discussed by [70]).

4. Extracellular Matrix of Uterine Fibroids

Compared to myometrium, in fibroids not only is the expression of collagen genes increased (as discussed by [71]), but also the amount of mature cross-linked collagen protein is increased and most importantly is altered (discussed in [18]) (Figure 3). The collagen fibrils are shorter and are disordered compared to normal myometrium (discussed by [18, 72]). Furthermore, the ratio of Type I/III collagen is altered. Several investigators demonstrated that Type V collagen, a type thought to be found in fibrotic tissue was a noticeable component of fibroids (as discussed by [73, 74]). Studies have also shown that fibroids and myometrium possess different percentages of the glycosaminoglycans chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate as there is 78% in myometrium and 95% in fibroids (as discussed in [75]). The main glycosaminoglycan is decorin whose presence correlates with fibroid size (as discussed in [76]) and as noted previously interacts with specific regions on the surface of the interstitial collagens and is involved in the organization and assembly of collagen fibrils. Interestingly, decorin exists in fibroids in a higher molecular weight form compared to normal myometrium, as it is glycosylated with longer dermatan sulfate side chains but has unaltered core proteins (as discussed by [55]). These modifications in decorin structure could increase osmotic pressure within the fibroid tissue. Distribution patterns of decorin and collagen were completely different in fibroids compared to normal myometrium when observed by immunofluorescence, and the ratio of decorin to Type I collagen was increased in fibroids (as discussed by [76]). These changes most likely affect the ECM organization of fibroids and would affect its stiffness.

Fibroids have increased fluid content relative to myometrium which could contribute to their mechanical properties and response to certain GnRH analogue therapies (as discussed by [77, 78]). One GnRH analogue, leuprolide acetate, will cause a regression of fibroid size; however, the tumors regrow rapidly after treatment is discontinued (as discussed by [79]). Since fibroids have a low mitotic index this regrowth is thought to be due to changes in the regulation of ECM component of the tumors rather than cell proliferation. A recent study demonstrated that leuprolide acetate may act directly on fibroids by an increase in the ECM genes, COL1A1, fibronectin, and veriscan variant 0, followed by return to normal after five days of treatment (as discussed by [80]). These findings were supported by the presence of GnRH receptors in uterine fibroid and subject-matched myometrium (as discussed by [81]). Similar to the concept of reciprocity for mechanical stress, hydration of the ECM requires an osmotic response regulated by the transcription factor, nuclear factor of activated T cells-5 (NFAT5) that coordinates expression of hyperosmolarity response genes, such as aldose reductase and sodium myoinositol transporter 1 (SMIT), all of which were increased in fibroid cells, compared to myometrial cells (as discussed by [82]). The contribution of hydration to the stiffness of fibroids was supported by viscoelastic measurements of fibroid tumors that took into account the contribution of water to ECM stiffness (as discussed by [2]).

Evidence is accumulating that it is the fibrotic process that contributes to the greater stiffness of fibroids compared to adjacent myometrium (as discussed in [13]). Fibrosis was detected by Masson Trichrome staining of collagen in uterine fibroids >1 cm. (as discussed by [83]). Fibrosis was found in 21% of 159 small “seedling” fibroids in premenopausal women and was increased to 50% in the same size tumors in postmenopausal women [84]. Substantial fibrosis, analyzed by morphometry, was noted in 23% of fibroids 2–4 mm in size, while 40% of the 5–9 mm tumors contained fibrotic tissue, a statistically significant increase. Cells were smaller in postmenopausal small fibroids compared to premenopausal fibroids matched within one degree of fibrosis or “fibrous degeneration” (as discussed in [83, 84]). Clearly, cells that could become larger uterine fibroids secreted collagen even before the fibroid was detected clinically. Interestingly, as early as 1983, investigators using electron microscopy observed cells in central regions of fibroids less than 3 mm in size that closely resembled myofibroblasts-cells capable of secreting collagen (as discussed in [85]).

Fibrosis has several components, namely, proliferation and persistence of cells due to resistance of apoptosis and the secretion of collagen by cells and the disposition of abundant highly cross-linked and disoriented collagen fibrils as well as the secretion of proteoglycans and other matrix components (as discussed in [6]). Not only a component of fibrosis is cell proliferation and the formation of new collagen and secretion of proteoglycans, but also an important part of the process is modification of cell proliferation and the correlation of a wide number of genes involved in ECM production including TGF induced myofibroblast differentiation (as discussed in [6]). The stiffness of the ECM that surrounds cells depends on the amount of cross-linking of the newly secreted altered collagen. We have found that LOX is over expressed in fibroids compared to myometrium (unpublished data) which suggests that collagen cross-linking is increased in fibroids. Thus, fibroids meet all of these characteristics of fibrosis. Although some pathologists have traditionally considered fibrosis to be a sign of fibroid senescence, the concept of mechanotransduction challenges this assumption. The changes in the surrounding ECM outlined in the preceding paragraphs would necessarily be accompanied by changes in the mechanical force exerted on resident fibroidal cells, thus leading to changes in cell signaling which would either enhance or inhibit tumor growth, including ECM secretion. Since fibrotic tissue contains abundant collagen, a stiff protein, these findings underscore the role of mechanotransduction in fibroid growth. Even a small amount of increased collagen and other components of the ECM in a cells microenvironment could increase the mechanical force on individual cells and alter cell signaling. Thus, it is not the altered ECM constitution alone but ECM stiffness that has a direct effect on fibroid formation and growth.

Fibrosis is initiated by many triggers which injure a cell, such as extravasation of blood into tissues, oxidative stress, infection, and chronic inflammation. The exact trigger that initiates the fibrotic process in fibroids remains unclear. It is possible that there is not one trigger but several causes, acting either alone, or in concert. For example, resident uterine stem cells might be triggered to undergo altered morphogenesis featuring fibrosis and hypoxia may play a role. The clonality of uterine fibroids (as discussed by [86] and references therein) supports the hypothesis that fibroids arise from a stem-like cell. The nascent fibroid milieu is certainly hypoxic, due in large part to altered angiogenesis, and this observation suggests a role for oxidative stress as a likely trigger for fibroid development and growth (as reviewed in [87]) We and others (as discussed in [88]) have noted that hypoxia might trigger stem cell proliferation giving rise to fibroids. Thus, hypoxia appears to be one underlying pathophysiologic mechanism promoting development of fibroids and a genetic predisposition might be another. Altered expression of Frizzled-related protein 1 was detected on early microarray studies of fibroids (as discussed in [89]), and altered Wingless-type (WNT)/β-catenin signaling has recently been reported to promote growth of leiomyoma side-population cells (as discussed in [90]). Thus, current evidence suggests that a specialized myometrial side population of cells (as discussed in [88, 91]) is induced to embark on a fibrotic differentiation, a predilection that is very common. To our thinking, the underlying etiology may be due to the remarkable plasticity and capacity of the uterus to respond to pregnancy-related myometrial growth, with ECM stiffness playing a critical role in expansion of that cell population leading to fibroid growth.

Intriguingly, fibroids are more common than expected in myometrium, immediately adjacent to endometrium compared to other area of the uterus (as discussed in [92]). Thus, it is equally plausible that extravasation of menstrual blood into the myometrium with its accompanying cytokines and growth factors might cause cell injury leading to fibrosis. Consistent with a location-dependent trigger, fibroids are not observed in equal distribution throughout the uterus. Fibroids are more common in the fundus than in the corpus and isthmus and even less common in the cervix as reported by a detailed morphometric study (as discussed in [92]). It has been hypothesized that ECM stiffness may contribute to tumor development in other systems (as discussed in [93, 94]), most likely through the RhoA pathway (as discussed in [95, 96]). Several studies implicate a role for activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in the pathogenesis of fibroids (as discussed in [97, 98]). Intriguingly, mechanical signaling through P13 K/AKT induces mTOR (as discussed in [99]). Thus, evidence from direct physical measurements, assessment of ECM structural organization, ECM constitution, microscopic analysis, and in vitro studies all support the critical role of ECM stiffness in fibroid growth.

5. New Directions for Fibroid Treatment

Given that uterine fibroids are primarily composed of an abnormally formed matrix, degradation of the ECM is critical for the resolution of the bulk symptoms caused by these tumors. Thus, the concept of mechanical signaling provides rationale for dissolution of the ECM as a treatment of fibroids. A change in mechanical force and signaling to myofibroblasts within the tumor would thus occur. In theory, the decreased force exerted against the cells would decrease signals that cause matrix deposition and then favor apoptosis of the fibroid cells. Consistent with this tenet, we found that degradation of uterine fibroid collagen by a bacterial (clostridium histolyticum) collagenase significantly reduced the tissue stiffness as measured by rheometry. This collagenase, first isolated over sixty years ago (as described by [100]), only degrades the interstitial collagens and it does not degrade Type IV collagen, the collagen found in blood vessels and nerves (discussed by [101]). Furthermore, this collagenase is inhibited by serum proteins (as discussed by [102]).

The altered mechanical properties of uterine fibroids provide support for the dissolution of ECM as a therapy. Fibroids occur in an environment of increased mechanical stress, but their response to the cues from this environment is paradoxically decreased (as discussed by [1, 2]). Myometrial cells reorient their actin cytoskeleton perpendicular to the axis of applied strain, but fibroid cells do not do so to the same degree (as discussed by [2]). Application of mechanical stress to fibroid cells in vitro led to diminished activation of RhoA, in contrast to myometrial cells, suggesting that myofibroblasts have an attenuated response to mechanical cues. Additionally, fibroid tumors exhibited increased stiffness in unconfined compression, compared to adjacent myometrium (discussed in [2]). Treatment of fibroid tissue with purified collagenase derived from clostridium demonstrated collagenolysis and reduced stiffness (as discussed in [3]), confirming the critical role of collagen in the ECM stiffness of fibroids. Likewise, the mechanisms of FUS (or HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE/UFE) in reducing fibroid size are due to necrosis, which also decreases fibroid stiffness by destroying ECM-producing cells, either from heat degradation or coagulation necrosis, respectively.

In keeping with investigations of Vitamin D effects on the ECM in other tissues, a recent study found that Vitamin D inhibits the expression and activities of both MMP2 and MMP9 in fibroid cells (as discussed in [103]). The substrates for MMP2 are numerous and include gelatin; collagen Types I, IV, V, VII, and X; and fibronectin, lamin, aggrecan, tenascin C, and vitronectin, while those of MMP-9 include gelatin; collagen Types IV, V, and XVI; aggrecan; and elastin (as discussed by [104]). Thus low vitamin D serum levels might affect numerous ECM proteins and vitamin D therapy might reduce the fibrotic process in the uterus, similar to the reduction of fibrosis in other tissues. It is very provocative that evidence from epidemiology points to low serum vitamin D as a factor in fibroid formation (as discussed by [105]) and may be one mechanism leading to the differences in fibroid growth in African American compared to Caucasian women (as discussed in [106]). In this study, women with sufficient levels of serum vitamin D had an estimated 32% lower risk of having fibroids.

Uterine fibroids do not grow in a consistently linear pattern, an observation consistent with modulation of growth by an altered ECM. In the same woman, as documented by careful MRI studies, some fibroids grew over six months of time and others were static, while others tended to regress in size. This same clinical investigation reported that women of African American ancestry continued to increase the size of their fibroids after age 35 until menopause. However, women who were identified as white tended to have nongrowing tumors during those ages (as discussed by [107]). When the fibroid tissues of women in this study who underwent surgery were studied for gene expression, dermatopontin was consistently downregulated as reported by others (discussed by [72]). Rho and RAC genes involved in mechanotransduction were elevated in growing tumors. Furthermore it appeared that growing fibroids cells accumulated because there is an absence of cell death signals. These investigators stated that growth of the tumors was also due to the mass accumulation of ECM (discussed by [108]). Recently, in vitro studies have shown that fibroid smooth muscle cells grown on different (nonpolymerized versus polymerized) collagen matrices exhibit differences in cell morphology, proliferation, and signaling pathways (as discussed by [109]). Consistent with an increase in ECM stiffness, in vivo measurement of fibroid elastography revealed heterogeneity between fibroids and supported an increased stiffness in fibroids in six patients (as discussed by [110]). Collectively, these seminal investigations provide strong evidence for a role of ECM and mechanotransduction in the growth of uterine fibroids. The role of integrins as mechanosensors is important to explore more fully. An important question to be answered is how they are involved in the activation stage of the accumulation of altered ECM (as discussed in [111]). Additional studies are needed to quantify ECM stiffness in growing compared to regressing fibroids as such studies may provide a missing piece to the enigmatic puzzle of fibroid growth.

6. Summary

The ECM, especially the interstitial collagens, exert mechanical forces on surrounding cells leading to transmittal of mechanical signals on the cell surface and the initiation of chemical cascades. Uterine fibroids are composed of abundant interstitial collagens (I, III, and V) with fibrils that exhibit a disordered pattern that is increased in amount compared to the adjacent myometrium. Other ECM proteins, especially fibronectin, are also increased relative to myometrium. Proteoglycans especially decorin and versican play roles in the alterations of the ECM organization within fibroids and contribute to the mechanical forces as well and thus to altered mechanical sensing by the cells leading to enhanced accumulation of ECM proteins. The nonlinear growth of fibroids over time and the various patterns of growth and regression of fibroids in the same uterus suggest a local effect of the ECM on mechanical signaling. Therefore, to fully understand uterine fibroids and to elucidate new therapeutic modalities it is essential to investigate further mechanisms of the role the ECM in these common benign tumors.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. R. Rogers, J. Norian, M. Malik et al., “Mechanical homeostasis is altered in uterine leiomyoma,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 474.e1–474.e11, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Norian, C. M. Owen, J. Taboas et al., “Characterization of tissue biomechanics and mechanical signaling in uterine leiomyoma,” Matrix Biology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. L. Jayes, X. Ma, E. M. Flannery, F. T. Moutos, F. Guilak, and P. C. Leppert, Biomechanical Evaluation of Human Uterine Fibroids after Exposure to Purified Clostridial Collagenase, Society for the Study of Reproduction, Montreal, Canada, 2013.
  4. N. Wang, J. P. Butler, and D. E. Ingber, “Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton,” Science, vol. 260, no. 5111, pp. 1124–1127, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. E. Jaalouk and J. Lammerding, “Mechanotransduction gone awry,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Boudreau and M. J. Bissell, “Extracellular matrix signaling: integration of form and function in normal and malignant cells,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 640–646, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Lu, V. M. Weaver, and Z. J. Werb, “The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 395–406, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. K, Y. Mouw, L. Damiano et al., “Tissue mechanics modulate microRNA-dependent PTEN expression to regulate malignant progression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 360–367, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Z. Jahed, H. Shams, M. Mehrbod, and M. R. K. Mofrad, “Pathways linking the extracellular matrix to the nucleus,” International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 310, pp. 171–220, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. E. Blaauboer, C. L. Emson, L. Verschuren et al., “Novel combination of collagen dynamics analysis and transcriptional profiling reveals fibrosis-relevant genes and pathways,” Matrix Biology, vol. 3215, no. 7-8, pp. 424–431, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Agha, R. Ogawa, G. Pietramaggiori, and D. P. Orgill, “A review of the role of mechanical forces in cutaneous wound healing,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 700–708, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Amano, K. Chihara, K. Kimura et al., “Formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions enhanced by Rho- kinase,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5304, pp. 1308–1311, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. E. Ingber, “Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 564–577, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. C. Leppert, “Tissue remodeling in the female reproductive tract: a complex process becomes more complex: the Role of Hox genes,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 86, no. 4, article 98, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. C. Bentley, G. L. Mutter, and S. J. Robboy, “Normal structure of the uterus,” in Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, G. S. Mutter, J. Prat, P. Russell, and M. C. Anderson, Eds., p. 297, Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 2nd edition, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. H. A. Roeder, S. F. Cramer, and P. C. Leppert, “A look at uterine wound healing through a histopathological study of uterine scars,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 463–473, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Schwalm and V. Dubrauszky, “The structure of the musculature of the human uterus—muscles and connective tissue,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 391–404, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
  18. P. C. Leppert, T. Baginski, C. Prupas, W. H. Catherino, S. Pletcher, and J. H. Segars, “Comparative ultrastructure of collagen fibrils in uterine leiomyomas and normal myometrium,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, supplement 3, pp. 1182–1187, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Ricard-Blum and F. Ruggiero, “The collagen superfamily: From the extracellular matrix to the cell membrane,” Pathologie Biologie, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 430–442, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Y. T. Kao and J. G. Leslie, “Polymorphism in human uterine collagen,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–129, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Z. Abedin, S. Ayad, and J. B. Weiss, “Type v collagen: the presence of appreciable amounts of α3(V) chain in uterus,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1237–1245, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. O. Pulkkinen, M. Lehto, M. Jalkanen, and K. Näntö-Salonen, “Collagen types and fibronectin in the uterine muscle of normal and hypertensive pregnant patients,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 149, no. 7, pp. 711–717, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Trüeb and P. Bornstein, “Characterization of the precursor form of type VI collagen,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 259, no. 13, pp. 8597–8604, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. P. Borel, “Uterine Collagen: general review,” Revue Françoise de Gynécologie et d’ Obstétriques, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 712–715, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  25. R. Timpl, H. Wiedemann, V. van Delden, H. Furthmayr, and K. Kühn, “A network model for the organization of type IV collagen molecules in basement membranes,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Kokenyesi, “Collagens and proteoglycans,” in The Extracellular Matrix of the Uterus, Cervix and Fetal Membranes: Synthesis, Degradation and Hormonal Regulation, P. C. Leppert and J. F. Woessner, Eds., pp. 15–28, Perinatology Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  27. R. Myllyla, J. Koivu, T. Pihlajaniemi, and K. I. Kivirikko, “Protein disulphide-isomerase activity in various cells synthesizing collagen,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. J. Prockop, K. I. Kivirikko, L. Tuderman, and N. A. Guzman, “The biosynthesis of collagen and its disorders (first of two parts),” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. J. Prockop and L. Tuderman, “Posttranslational enzymes in the biosynthesis of collagen: extracellular enzymes,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 82, pp. 305–319, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Hofmann, P. P. Fietzek, and K. Kühn, “The role of polar and hydrophobic interactions for the molecular packing of type I collagen: a three-dimensional evaluation of the amino acid sequence,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 137–165, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. F. Holmes, C. J. Gilpin, C. Baldock, U. Ziese, A. J. Koster, and K. E. Kadler, “Corneal collagen fibril structure in three dimensions: Structural insights into fibril assembly, mechanical properties, and tissue organization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 13, pp. 7307–7312, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. B. Rücker, N. Romero-Chapman, T. Wong et al., “Modulation of lysyl oxidase by dietary copper in rats,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Saito, K. Marumo, K. Fujii, and N. Ishioka, “Single-column high-performance liquid chromatographic-fluorescence detection of immature, mature, and senescent cross-links of collagen,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 253, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. A. Lucero and H. M. Kagan, “Lysyl oxidase: an oxidative enzyme and effector of cell function,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 63, no. 19-20, pp. 2304–2316, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. Henkel and R. W. Glanville, “Covalent crosslinking between molecules of type I and type III collagen,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. M. Mak, E. Chu, K. H. V. Lau, and A. J. Kwong, “Liver fibrosis in elderly cadavers: localization of type I, III, and IV, α-smooth muscle actin, and elastic fibers,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 295, no. 7, pp. 1159–1167, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Prydz and K. T. Dalen, “Synthesis and sorting of proteoglycans,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 193–205, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  38. N. A. Visser, G. P. J. Vankampen, M. H. M. T. Dekoning, and J. K. Vanderkorst, “The effects of loading on the synthesis of biglycan and decorin in intact mature articular cartilage in vitro,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 241–250, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. E. Scott and C. R. Orford, “Dermatan sulphate-rich proteoglycan associates with rat tail-tendon collagen at the d band in the gap region,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 213–216, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  40. E. Schonherr, H. Hausser, L. Beavan, and H. Kresse, “Decorin-type I collagen interaction. Presence of separate core protein-binding domains,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 15, pp. 8877–8883, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Kresse, H. Hausser, and E. Schonherr, “Small proteoglycans,” Experientia, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 403–416, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. V. Iozzo, “The biology of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans. Functional network of interactive proteins,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 27, pp. 18843–18846, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. G. A. Berto, S. M. Oba, Y. M. Michelacci, and L. O. Sampaio, “Galactosaminoglycans from normal myometrium and leiomyoma,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 633–637, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  44. P. C. Leppert, R. Kokenyesi, C. A. Klemenich, and J. Fisher, “Further evidence of a decorin-collagen interaction in the disruption of cervical collagen fibers during rat gestation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 805–812, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. Kokenyesi and J. F. Woessner Jr., “Effects of hormonal perturbations on the small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan and mechanical properties of the uterine cervix of late pregnant rats.,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Kokenyesi and J. F. Woessner Jr., “Relationship between dilatation of the rat uterine cervix and a small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Ruscheinsky, C. de la Motte, and M. Mahendroo, “Hyaluronan and its binding proteins during cervical ripening and parturition: dynamic changes in size, distribution and temporal sequence,” Matrix Biology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 487–497, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. Akgul, R. Holt, M. Mummert, A. Word, and M. Mahendroo, “Dynamic changes in cervical glycosaminoglycan composition during normal pregnancy and preterm birth,” Endocrinology, vol. 153, no. 7, pp. 3493–3503, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. D. A. Carrino, S. Mesiano, N. M. Barker, W. W. Hurd, and A. I. Caplan, “Proteoglycans of uterine fibroids and keloid scars: similarity in their proteoglycan composition,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 443, no. 2, pp. 361–368, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. R. de Lima, J. D. A. dos Santos Jr., A. C. P. Nazário, and Y. M. Michelacci, “Changes in glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans of normal breast and fibroadenoma during the menstrual cycle,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: General Subjects, vol. 1820, no. 7, pp. 1009–1019, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. T. Cirulis, C. M. Bellingham, E. C. Davis et al., “Fibrillins, fibulins, and matrix-associated glycoprotein modulate the kinetics and morphology of in vitro self-assembly of a recombinant elastin-like polypeptide,” Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 47, pp. 12601–12613, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. P. C. Leppert and S. Y. Yu, “Three-dimensional structures of uterine elastic fibers: scanning electron microscopic studies,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Barczyk, A. I. Bolstad, and D. Gullberg, “Role of integrins in the periodontal ligament: organizers and facilitators,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Elosegui-Artola, E. Bazellières, M. D. Allen et al., “Rigidity sensing and adaption through regulation of integrin types,” Nature Materials, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 631–637, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  55. S. Israeli-Rosenberg, A. M. Manso, H. Okada, and R. S. Ross, “Integrins and integrins-associated proteins in the cardiac myoctye,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 572–586, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  56. G. Mechtersheimer, T. Barth, A. Quentmeier, and P. Möller, “Differential expression of β1 integrins in nonneoplastic smooth and striated muscle cells and in tumors derived from these cells,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 1172–1182, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  57. C. V. Taylor, M. Letarte, and S. J. Lye, “The expression of integrins and cadherins in normal human uterus and uterine leiomyomas,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 411–419, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. Peavey, N. Salleh, and P. C. Leppert, “Collagen-binding α11 integrin expression in human myometrium and fibroids utilizing a novel RNA in situ probe,” Reproductive Sciences, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. H. Ji, V. Long, V. Briody, and E. K. Chien, “Progesterone modulates integrin α2 (ITGA2) and α11 (ITGA11) in the pregnant cervix,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 156–163, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. Malik, J. Segars, and W. H. Catherino, “Integrin β1 regulates leiomyoma cytoskeletal integrity and growth,” Matrix Biology, vol. 31, no. 7-8, pp. 389–397, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Singh, C. Carraher, and J. E. Schwarzbauer, “Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 26, pp. 397–419, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. D. C. Hocking, P. A. Titus, R. Sumagin, and I. H. Sarelius, “Extracellular matrix fibronectin mechanically couples skeletal muscle contraction with local vasodilation,” Circulation Research, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 372–379, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Lohi, C. L. Wilson, J. D. Roby, and W. C. Parks, “Epilysin, a novel human matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-28) expressed in testis and keratinocytes and in response to injury,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 13, pp. 10134–10144, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. H. Nagase, R. Visse, and G. Murphy, “Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 562–573, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Page-McCaw, A. J. Ewald, and Z. Werb, “Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 221–233, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. Suzuki, J. J. Enghild, T. Morodomi, G. Salvesen, and H. Nagase, “Mechanisms of activation of tissue procollagenase by matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysin),” Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 44, pp. 10261–10270, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Chung, D. Dinakarpandian, N. Yoshida et al., “Collagenase unwinds triple-helical collagen prior to peptide bond hydrolysis,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 3020–3030, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. T. E. Curry Jr. and K. G. Osteen, “The matrix metalloproteinase system: changes, regulation, and impact throughout the ovarian and uterine reproductive cycle,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 428–465, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. H. Khalili, A. H. Talasaz, and M. Salarifar, “Serum vitamin D concentration status and its correlation with early biomarkers of remodeling following acute myocardial infarction,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 321–327, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Abramovitch, L. Dahan-Bachar, E. Sharvit et al., “Vitamin D inhibits proliferation and profibrotic marker expression in hepatic stellate cells and decreases thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats,” Gut, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1728–1737, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. E. A. Stewart, A. J. Friedman, K. Peck, and R. A. Nowak, “Relative overexpression of collagen type I and collagen type III messenger ribonucleic acids by uterine leiomyomas during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 900–906, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. W. H. Catherino, P. C. Leppert, M. H. Stenmark et al., “Reduced dermatopontin expression is a molecular link between uterine leiomyomas and keloids,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 204–217, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. L. Feng, N. Aviles, S. Leikin, and P. Leppert, “Pattern of collagen types in uterine fibroids,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 17, article 270A, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  74. M. Iwahashi and Y. Muragaki, “Increased type I and V collagen expression in uterine leiomyomas during the menstrual cycle,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 2137–2139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. O. Sampaio, C. P. Dietrich, and O. Giannotti Filho, “Changes in sulfated mucopolysaccharide composition of mammalian tissues during growth and in cancer tissues,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 498, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. G. Berto, L. O. Sampaio, C. R. Franco, R. M. Cesar Jr., and Y. M. Michelacci, “A comparative analysis of structure and spatial distribution of decorin in human leiomyoma and normal myometrium,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: General Subjects, vol. 1619, no. 1, pp. 98–112, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. F. A. Aleem and M. Predanic, “The hemodynamic effect of GnRH agonist therapy on uterine leiomyoma vascularity: a prospective study using transvaginal color Doppler sonography,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 253–258, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. S. Okuda, K. Oshio, H. Shinmoto et al., “Semiquantitative assessment of MR imaging in prediction of efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for volume reduction of uterine leiomyoma: initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 917–924, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. C. P. West, M. A. Lumsden, S. Lawson, J. Williamson, and D. D. Baird, “Shrinkage of uterine fibroids during therapy with goserelin (Zoladex): a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist administered as a monthly subcutaneous depot,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  80. J. L. Britten, M. Malik, G. Levy, M. Mendoza, and W. H. Catherino, “Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist leuprolide acetate and GnRH antagonist cetrorelix acetate directly inhibit leiomyoma extracellular matrix production,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 1299–1307, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. D. Parker, M. Malik, and W. H. Catherino, “Human myometrium and leiomyomas express gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone 2 receptor,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. D. M. McCarthy-Keith, M. Malik, J. Britten, J. Segars, and W. H. Catherino, “Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist increases expression of osmotic response genes in leiomyoma cells,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 2383–2387, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. S. F. Cramer, J. Horiszny, A. Patel, and S. Sigrist, “The relation of fibrous degeneration to menopausal status in small uterine leiomyomas with evidence for postmenopausal origin of seedling myomas,” Modern Pathology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 774–780, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  84. S. F. Cramer, C. Marchetti, J. Freedman, and A. Padela, “Relationship of myoma cell size and menopausal status in small uterine leiomyomas,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 1448–1453, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  85. I. Konishi, S. Fujii, C. Ban, Y. Okuda, H. Okamura, and S. Tojo, “Ultrastructural study of minute uterine leiomyomas,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. J. T. Holdsworth-Carson, M. Zaitseva, B. J. Vollenhoven, and P. A. Rogers, “Clonality of smooth muscle and fibroid cells populations isolated from human fibroid and myometrial tissues,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 250–259, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. Tal and J. H. Segars, “The role of angiogenic factors in fibroid pathogenesis: potential implications for future therapy,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 149–216, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. T. Maruyama, M. Ono, and Y. Yoshimura, “Somatic stem cells in the myometrium and in myomas,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 77–81, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. C. M. Tsibris, J. Segars, D. Coppola et al., “Insights from gene arrays on the development and growth regulation of uterine leiomyomata,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. Ono, P. Yin, A. Navarro et al., “Paracrine activation of WNT/β catenin pathway in uterine leiomyoma stem cells promotes tumor growth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 24, pp. 17053–17058, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  91. M. Ono, T. Maruyama, H. Masuda et al., “Side population in human uterine myometrium displays phenotypic and functional characteristics of myometrial stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 47, pp. 18700–18705, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. S. F. Cramer and A. Patel, “The nonrandom regional distribution of uterine leiomyomas: a clue to histogenesis?” Human Pathology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 635–638, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. D. E. Ingber, “Can cancer be reversed by engineering the tumor microenvironment?” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 356–364, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. D. T. Butcher, T. Alliston, and V. M. Weaver, “A tense situation: forcing tumour progression,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 108–122, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. M. J. Paszek and V. M. Weaver, “The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 325–342, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. J. Paszek, N. Zahir, K. R. Johnson et al., “Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype,” Cancer Cell, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 241–254, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. J. S. Crabtree, S. A. Jelinsky, H. A. Harris et al., “Comparison of human and rat uterine leiomyomata: identification of a dysregulated mammalian target of rapamycin pathway,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 15, pp. 6171–6178, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. B. V. Varghese, F. Koohestani, M. McWilliams et al., “Loss of the repressor REST in uterine fibroids promotes aberrant G protein-coupled receptor 10 expression and activates mammalian target of rapamycin pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 2187–2192, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. N. E. Zanchi and A. H. Lancha Jr., “Mechanical stimuli of skeletal muscle: Implications on mTOR/p70s6k and protein synthesis,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 253–263, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. I. Mandl, J. D. MacLennan, and E. L. Howes, “Isolation and characteristics of proteinase and collagenase from Cl histolyticum,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1323–1329, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. T. Toyoshima, O. Matsushita, J. Minami, N. Nishi, A. Okabe, and T. Itano, “Collagen-binding domain of a Clostridium histolyticum collagenase exhibits a broad substrate spectrum both in vitro and in vivo,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 281–290, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. W. Borth, E. J. Menzel, M. Salzer, and C. Steffen, “Human serum inhibitors of collagenase as revealed by preparative isoelectric focusing,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 219–225, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. S. K. Halder, K. G. Osteen, and A. Al-Hendy, “Vitamin D3 inhibits expression and activities of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in human uterine fibroid cells,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2407–2416, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. B. R. Heaps, M. House, S. Socrate, P. Leppert, and J. F. Strauss III, “Matrix biology and preterm birth,” in Preterm Birth Mechanisms, Mediators, Prediction, Prevention and Interventions, F. Petraglia, J. F. Strauss III, S. G. Gabbe, and G. Weiss, Eds., chapter 8, pp. 70–93, Oxon, Informa Healthcare, Abington, Ill, USA, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  105. D. D. Baird, M. C. Hill, J. M. Schectman, and B. W. Hollis, “Vitamin D and the risk of uterine fibroids,” Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 447–453, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. D. D. Baird, D. B. Dunson, M. C. Hill, D. Cousins, and J. M. Schectman, “High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: Ultrasound evidence,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 100–107, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. S. D. Peddada, S. K. Laughlin, K. Miner et al., “Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 50, pp. 19887–19892, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. B. J. Davis, J. I. Risinger, G. V. R. Chandramouli, P. R. Bushel, D. D. Baird, and S. D. Peddada, “Gene Expression in Uterine Leiomyoma from Tumors Likely to Be Growing (from Black Women over 35) and Tumors Likely to Be Non-Growing (from White Women over 35),” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e63909, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. F. Koohestani, A. G. Braudmeier, A. Mahdian et al., “Extracellular matrix collagen alters cell proliferation and cell cycle progression of human uterine smooth muscle cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, Article ID 0075844, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. E. A. Stewart, F. A. Taran, J. Chen et al., “Magnetic resonance elastography of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 281–284, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. D. Gullberg, “Shift happens—a paradigm shift for the role of integrins in fibrosis,” Matrix Biology, vol. 28, no. 7, p. 383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Phyllis C. Leppert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.