Research Article

Prevalence, Indications, and Community Perceptions of Caesarean Section Delivery in Ngora District, Eastern Uganda: Mixed Method Study

Table 5

Generated themes and myths generated from the focus group discussion.

Themes and subthemes generated from focus group discussionNumber, n, and percentage (%) of respondents
MaleFemale respondents
YesNoUndecidedYesNoUndecided

Theme 1: community perception of women undergoing caesarean section
Subtheme: doctors’ monetary benefit25 (65.8)5 (13.2)8 (21.1)12 (50)8 (33.3)4 (16.7)
Subtheme: dangerous procedure30 (78.9)5 (13.2)3 (7.9)20 (83.3)2 (8.3)2 (8.3)
Subtheme: laziness29 (76.3)7 (18.4)2 (5.3)10 (41.7)11 (45.8)3 (12.5)

Theme 2: perceived indications and risk factors for caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: previous scars (from previous caesarean section and vaginal delivery)20 (52.6)10 (26.3)8 (21.1)17 (70.8)2 (8.3)5 (20.8)
Subtheme: medical deformities16 (42.1)4 (10.5)18 (47.4)20 (83.3)4 (16.7)0 (0)
Subtheme: maternal age18 (47.4)15 (39.5)5 (13.2)19 (79.2)3 (12.5)2 (8.3)

Theme 3: perceived advantages of caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: lifesaving15 (39.5)16 (42.1)7 (18.4)20 (83.3)2 (8.3)2 (8.3)
Subtheme: prevents mother-to-child transmission of HIV21 (55.3)5 (13.2)12 (31.6)17 (70.8)5 (20.8)2 (8.3)

Theme 4: perceived disadvantages of caesarean section delivery
Subtheme: expensive procedure34 (89.5)4 (10.5)0 (0)20 (83.3)4 (16.7)0 (0)
Subtheme: family breakups20 (52.6)15 (39.5)3 (7.9)6 (25)17 (70.8)1 (4.2)