Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
Table 3
Sociodemographic, obstetric, labor, and delivery characteristics of Robson Group 3 women who experienced cesarean birth compared to vaginal birth, bivariate comparisons, and multivariable models.
(3B) Multivariable model of characteristics associated with cesarean birth
Multivariable Poisson model with robust error variance of characteristics associated with cesarean birth
Characteristic
RR
CI
value
Compared to less than 12 hours of labor
2.8
0.7, 12.0
2.0
Likelihood of cesarean if labor duration “not applicable”
0.2
0.5, 8.1
0.3
Likelihood of cesarean if labor duration 12–24 hours
3.6
0.9, 14.3
0.07
Likelihood of cesarean if labor duration >24 hours
Likelihood of cesarean of rural compared to urban location
0.6
0.1, 2.4
0.4
Likelihood of cesarean with each increasing centimeter of dilation on admission cervical exam
0.8
0.6, 1.0
0.07
aKruskal–Wallis test. bFisher’s Exact test. cChi-squared test. dVariables included in the model without an association with the outcome: urban/rural residence, diagnosis of chorioamnionitis, and infant birthweight.