Review Article

Natural Antioxidant Activity of Commonly Consumed Plant Foods in India: Effect of Domestic Processing

Table 5

Effect of domestic processing on FRAP activity of commonly consumed green leafy vegetables.

Sl. no.Common nameBotanical nameFRAP (mg/100 g FeSO4 Eq.)
RawConventionalPressure Microwave

1AmaranthAmaranthus gangeticus 8237.6a
(100)
11370b
(138)
12102b
(146)
11786b
(143)
2Ambat chukkaRumex vesicarius 3511.6
(100)
3270
(93)
2946
(83)
3243
(92)
3Coriander leavesCoriandrum sativum 7125.6a
(100)
18636b
(261)
16123c
(226)
19802d
(277)
4Curry leavesMurraya koenigii 20275.0a
(100)
18533b
(91)
24213c
(119)
27392d
(135)
5Fennel leavesFoeniculum vulgare 9238.6a
(100)
10128a
(109)
9970a
(107)
13362b
(144)
6Fenugreek leavesTrigonella foenum-graecum 3409.6a
(100)
3919b
(114)
4799c
(140)
5429d
(159)
7Purslane leavesPortulaca oleracea 2863.3a
(100)
4327b
(151)
4800c
(167)
4030b
(140)
8GoguHibiscus cannabinus 5254.0
(100)
7274
(138)
6921
(131)
7107
(135)
9MintMentha spicata 27827.6a
(100)
42562b
(152)
48909b,c
(175)
50401c
(181)
10PonnagantiAlternanthera sessilis 5068.3
(100)
4280
(84)
4837
(95)
4327 
(85)
11SpinachSpinacia oleracea 1380.6a
(100)
3196b
(231)
3471b
(251)
3502b
(253)

Mean values were compared by nonparametric Kruskal wallis one way ANOVA. Differences in alphabets are significantly different at P < 0.05. Percent gain or loss calculated when raw value taken as 100%. Percent recovery values are given in parentheses. Decimal points are not given due to higher numbers.