Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Neurodegeneration, Neurogenesis, and Oxidative Stress 2015

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3215391 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3215391

Oxidative Stress in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Sources, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targets

Academic Editor: Renata Santos
Received01 Sep 2015
Revised19 Oct 2015
Accepted20 Oct 2015
Published30 Dec 2015

Abstract

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with the highest mortality and morbidity despite only constituting approximately 10–15% of all strokes. Complex underlying mechanisms consisting of cytotoxic, excitotoxic, and inflammatory effects of intraparenchymal blood are responsible for its highly damaging effects. Oxidative stress (OS) also plays an important role in brain injury after ICH but attracts less attention than other factors. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that the metabolite axis of hemoglobin-heme-iron is the key contributor to oxidative brain damage after ICH, although other factors, such as neuroinflammation and prooxidases, are involved. This review will discuss the sources, possible molecular mechanisms, and potential therapeutic targets of OS in ICH.

1. Introduction

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, although studies of ICH intervention have increased dramatically in the past decades [1]. Currently, there is no effective surgical or medical treatment available to improve the functional outcomes in patients with ICH because of its multiple injury mechanisms [1, 2]. Numerous preclinical studies show that secondary brain injury after ICH is caused by the interaction of cytotoxicity, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress (OS), and inflammation from the products of red blood cell lysis and plasma components [3, 4]. However, the precise pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ICH remain to be completely elucidated.

OS is a condition in which the overproduction of free radicals, mainly reactive oxygen species (ROS), exceeds the antioxidant capacity and subsequently leads to cell injury via directly oxidizing cellular protein, lipid, and DNA or participating in cell death signaling pathways [5]. OS has been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system and stroke [6, 7]. There are three major types of ROS: the superoxide radical (), the hydroxyl radical (), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [8]. Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are another major type of free radicals, which mainly consist of nitric oxide (NO) and its derivatives. NO is produced in neurons, endothelial cells, and activated astrocytes by nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Under physiological conditions, NO mediates neurotransmission and regulates neuronal survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Under pathological conditions, however, excessive NO can lead to OS via various mechanisms [9]. Moreover, NO reacts with to form the more toxic compound peroxynitrite (ONOO), which can cause oxidation and nitration of tyrosine residues in proteins [10].

Experimental studies have confirmed that OS plays a pivotal role in cerebral injury following ICH. The oxidative products of macromolecules significantly increased, whereas antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase, correspondingly decreased as a result of ICH [11, 12]. Free radical scavengers proved to be effective in neuroprotection in animal ICH models [13, 14]. Moreover, oxidative markers, leukocyte 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine and lipid hydroperoxides, are detected in association with long-term and short-term clinical outcomes, respectively, after spontaneous ICH [15, 16]. However, no antioxidant has been applied in patients with ICH because of the unclear mechanism of OS-related injury. The current review attempted to illustrate the knowledge regarding ICH-related OS and its possible molecular mechanism and to discuss the potential targets of intervention for future research.

2. Primary and Secondary Brain Injury after ICH

Primary brain injury is caused by immediate physical disruption to the neurovascular architecture surrounding the hemorrhagic site due to sheering force and the mass effect of an ICH. Surgical clot evacuation targeting the primary injury has failed due to the extra adverse effects of the surgical procedure [17, 18]. Many clinical trials on minimally invasive surgery for ICH evacuation have thus been performed with potentially improved functional outcomes [19, 20]. However, there are several drawbacks, such as the long time required for an adequate blood evacuation, a relatively high risk of infection and rehemorrhage, and intensive labor and resource consumption [21]. After the onset of bleeding, hematoma enlargement further exacerbates brain damage in 20–40% patients within 24 hours [22]. Hypertension may be a modified factor affecting hematoma growth [23].

When initial bleeding stops and a stable hematoma is formed, a cascade of events occurs to induce secondary brain injury. Thrombin is instantly produced after ICH to stop bleeding, but it also contributes to early neural and endothelial injury [24]. Inflammatory cells infiltrate and damage perihematoma viable brain tissue by excreting a variety of cytokines and chemokines [25]. Another contributor to brain injury after ICH is hemoglobin and its metabolite released via erythrocyte lysis in hematoma [26]. As the major component of hemoglobin, heme can be degraded into iron, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin by heme oxygenase (HO). Iron overload in the brain after hemorrhage subsequently generates abundant ROS, resulting in neurotoxicity [27]. These overlapped mechanisms interact and result in blood brain-barrier (BBB) disruption, neuronal loss, and gliosis with permanent neurological deficits.

3. OS in ICH

ROS are byproducts of cellular metabolism and are mainly generated by mitochondria in living cells [28]. They are highly active with a short half-life, making them very difficult to analyze directly in the laboratory [29]. OS is usually assessed by indirectly measuring the oxidized products of macromolecules. 8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is a widely used biomarker of in vivo oxidative DNA damage. Both malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenal (HNE) are lipid peroxides produced by free radical attack. Dinitrophenyl (DNP) and protein carbonyl can be measured to quantify protein oxidative damage. The detection of oxidized hydroethidine (HEt) is specifically used to assess production in vivo because HEt can pass through the BBB and be selectively taken up by neuron and glia cells and oxidized by to ethidine (Et), which provides a red fluorescence signal [30].

In a rodent ICH model, 8-OHdG and DNP increased along the same time course, with peak production at 3 days after ICH, suggesting the presence of OS in ICH [12]. Additionally, the level of MDA increases and is correlated with apoptosis following ICH, indicating that OS contributes to ICH-induced brain injury [31]. Moreover, brain white matter is also damaged as a result of protein oxidation in a porcine ICH model [32].

Recently, OS was reported to exert a prognostic effect in ICH patients. A prospective study analyzing blood samples from 64 ICH patients revealed that elevated level of leukocyte 8-OHdG was associated with lower 30-day Barthel Index independent of traditional prognostic factors [15]. Another prognostic study reported that the serum lipid hydroperoxide (ROOH) concentration was a predictor of poor clinical outcome in ICH survivors and was positively correlated with short-term mortality [16]. In contrast, Mantle et al. observed similar levels of protein carbonyl and antioxidants in ICH and control cases, suggesting that there may be no increased oxidative damage in ICH [33]. This unexpected result is questionable because the tissue (peritumor or aneurysm tissue) used as a control for the oxidative measurement may be pathologically compromised with potentially elevated levels of OS and therefore is not a qualified control [34].

4. Free Radical Sources after ICH

4.1. Mitochondria Dysfunction

Physiologically, 1–3% of all electrons in the electron transport chain in mitochondria leak, generating superoxide radicals, that can be neutralized by normal antioxidant systems [28]. During ICH, mitochondria dysfunction occurs, and substantial ROS production follows [35, 36]. Kim-Han et al. detected an obvious reduction in the oxygen consumption rates of mitochondria in ICH patients, indicating that mitochondria dysfunction, and not ischemia, is responsible for the decreased oxygen metabolites after ICH [35]. Direct evidence of ROS from malfunctioning mitochondria was reported in a recent study, which found that a mitochondrial ROS-specific scavenger can significantly alleviate the increased ROS following ICH [37]. The mechanism of excessive ROS formation by mitochondria after ICH remains unclear but may be partially attributable to mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) because the inhibition of MPTP can attenuate ROS production [37].

4.2. Hb-Heme-Iron

As the most abundant erythrocyte protein, hemoglobin (Hb) is released into the extracellular space via complement-mediated cell lysis in the hours after ICH and is a potent mediator of OS-induced injury [38, 39]. Both in vitro and in vivo investigations have shown that ROS is highly produced after exposing Hb to cell culture or injecting Hb into mouse striatum [3941]. Katsu et al. studied the temporal change of ROS in a Hb-injection rat model and observed remarkable ROS production as early as 1 h, which increased at 24 h [42]. Recently, NO, a form of RNS, has also been found to be overproduced because of NOS activation and leads to BBB disruption after infusing Hb into rat brain [43]. Regarding the prooxidant mechanism of Hb, it is commonly believed that iron released from its degradation is responsible for oxidative damage because an iron chelator may block Hb-induced neurotoxicity [44]. In fact, Hb itself can release a large amount of superoxide during spontaneous, nonenzymatic oxidation to oxyhemoglobin and methemoglobin [45, 46].

Heme, released from methemoglobin, quickly oxidizes to form hemin, which also triggers oxidative damage in brain tissue around the hematoma. An in vitro experiment demonstrated that hemin exposure leads to cell death, preceded by a significant, iron-dependent increase in ROS [47]. Nevertheless, another in vitro study showed that hemin could stimulate lipid peroxidation, irrespective of iron mediation, because the reaction could not be inhibited by deferoxamine or transferrin [48]. Hence, the mechanism of hemin-related oxidative damage partly involves its breakdown to iron by HO, similar to that of Hb [49]. Indeed, hemin is redox-active and can react with peroxides to produce cytotoxic free radicals [48, 50]. Moreover, hemin can intercalate into the cell plasma membrane, facilitating lipid peroxidation [51]. Given the effect of hemin in preclinical studies, biphasic functions are observed. Hemin-induced brain injury is evidenced by increased brain water content at 24 hours after intracerebral hemin infusion [46]. In contrast, systemic hemin treatment is neuroprotective after ICH [52]. Although the mechanisms underlying the protection provided by systemic hemin administration are poorly understood, it is clear that most hemin is in circulation rather than in the brain.

Iron overload is involved in secondary brain injury, leading to neuronal death, brain edema, and neurodeficits after ICH [53, 54]. Intracerebral iron overload begins within 24 h, peaks at 7 days, and continues for at least a month after hemorrhage [55]. Excessive iron in the extracellular space induces oxidative damage via the Fenton reaction, which yields ROS, especially toxic hydroxyl radicals [56]. Direct evidence of iron-mediated oxidative injury has shown that injecting FeCl2 into rat brain causes oxidative DNA damage [11, 12]. The strongest finding supporting the hypothesis of iron-mediated oxidative brain injury is that iron chelators decrease iron accumulation, attenuate ROS generation, exert anti-inflammatory effects, and improve neurological function [57, 58].

4.3. Inflammatory Cells

Neuroinflammation is recognized as a vital factor in the pathophysiology of ICH-induced brain injury and is characterized by microglia activation, leukocyte infiltration, and cytokine and chemokine production [3, 4, 25]. In addition to the release of inflammatory factors, the activation of inflammatory cells following ICH, initially to remove oxidative toxins, also participates in ROS production.

As one type of innate immune cell within the brain, microglia are rapidly activated within 1 h after ICH, peaking at 3–7 days and persisting for several weeks [59]. Hb is a powerful activator of microglia via toll-like receptors [60]. The imbalance of the phenotypic shift between the M1 and M2 phenotypes of microglia contributes to a large release of ROS in addition to proinflammatory factors [61]. Cell experiments have shown that microglia can induce ROS production in vitro [58, 59]. Furthermore, the inhibition of microglia was reported to decrease the ROS production and brain damage volume in an ICH animal model [62].

Neutrophils are the earliest leucocytes to enter the brain after ICH. The role of neutrophils in radical production during ischemic brain stroke has been confirmed by reduced radical formation after neutrophil depletion [63]. OS-related brain injury is part of the pathogenesis mechanism of neutrophil infiltration after ICH [64]. The inflammation linked to OS following ICH indicates that neuroinflammation and OS are intercalated in ICH-induced secondary brain injury.

5. Prooxidase in ICH

The process of OS is related to the activation of many prooxidases in many diseases. The prooxidases that are reported in ischemia stroke include NADPH oxidase (NOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), xanthine oxidase, and nitric oxide synthase [NOS] [65]. In ICH, NOX and NOS are most commonly studied [10, 6668].

5.1. NADPH Oxidase

NOX is a major source of ROS and is mainly composed of five subunits: a large gp91phox and a smaller gp22phox subunit in the plasma membrane and p47phox, p67phox, and p40phox subunits in cytoplasm [65]. Once cytosolic p47phox is phosphorylated upon stimulation, it binds to the components of the plasma membrane and activates NOX, which can transfer electrons from NADPH to oxygen, forming superoxide [66]. Seven NOX isoforms, NOX1 to NOX5 and Dual Oxidases 1 and 2, have been identified among which NOX2 (gp91phox) is abundant in the brain [6769]. Tang et al. found that the OS resulting from activation of NOX2 contributes to the severity of ICH and promotes brain injury by comparing wild-type and gp91phox knockout mice [67]. The gp91phox knockout hemorrhagic mice showed lower levels of oxidative product, ICH volume, brain water content, neurological deficit, and mortality rate [67].

Another study by Zia and colleagues showed that the induction of NOX2 could cause OS and worsen brain injury, whereas the inhibition of NOX2 by apocynin suppresses ROS production and confers neuroprotection in rabbit pups with germinal matrix hemorrhage-intraventricular hemorrhage (GMH-IVH) [68]. Moreover, OS resulting from NOX2 activation not only deteriorated ICH-related injury but was associated with the occurrence of ICH in hypertensive mice [70]. However, the same NOX2 inhibitor that exerts a protective property in the GMH-ICH model by preventing p47phox subunit translocation exhibits no effects on enhanced NOX2 activity, lipid peroxidation, brain edema, or neurological dysfunction in a rat ICH model [71]. It is possible that different species (rabbit versus rat), hemorrhagic locations (GMH-IVH versus basal ganglia hemorrhage), and bleeding (autologous artery blood versus collagenase) are responsible for these opposing conclusions.

5.2. Nitric Oxide Synthase

There are three isoforms of NOS accounting for NO production: neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS), and inducible NOS (iNOS). The first two are constitutively expressed, and their activities are calcium dependent, whereas the last one is synthesized by the induction of proinflammatory cytokines, independent of calcium regulation [72].

The activation of NOS after ICH has been demonstrated in many studies. Using the autologous blood model, Zhao et al. reported the temporal profile of iNOS and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and found that the maximal detection of iNOS paralleled the peak concentration of NF-κB at 3 days after ICH, suggesting that iNOS may be mediated by NF-κB because the downstream gene products of NF-κB include iNOS [73]. Other investigators detected NOS overexpression and suggested the role of the NOS/NO/ONOO pathway in BBB disruption using the Hb-injection rat model [10, 43]. In contrast, administering nNOS inhibitor after ICH was found to protect BBB integrity and decrease both neuronal death and neurological deficits [74]. Moreover, iNOS knockout mice present significantly less brain edema after collagenase-induced ICH [75]. Therefore, NOS might be a therapeutic target.

The molecular mechanisms for NOS activation after ICH are primarily NF-κB dependent [9, 73]. Thrombin and proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1, can induce iNOS expression in microglia via the PKC/p38MAFP/NF-κB pathway [76]. Hemin also activates the NF-κB transcription factor via an undefined mechanism [77, 78]. In addition, high levels of glutamate activate NOS through the NMDA receptor with subsequent Ca2+ influx by phosphorylating IKB and NF-κB translocation [74, 79].

6. Antioxidative System in ICH

6.1. Heme Oxygenase

Extracellular heme binds to hemopexin to enter neuronal cells through the hemopexin receptor or heme carrier protein 1 [80]. Intracellular heme is then degraded into iron, carbon monoxide, and biliverdin. HO is the rate-limiting enzyme for this catabolic process with two active isoenzymes: the inducible HO-1 and the constitutively active HO-2. HO-1 is barely detected in the brain under normal conditions but is induced in microglia/macrophages after ICH, whereas HO-2 is normally expressed in neurons, accounting for the vast majority of HO activity in the brain [81].

The antioxidant effects of these enzymes on ICH-induced secondary brain injury are debatable and have been thoroughly reviewed by Chen-Roetling et al. [82]. Their roles are variable, depending on the different ICH models used and various cellular types affected [82]. Compared to wild-type mice, HO-2 knockout was found to attenuate brain injury, remarkably reducing cell loss, striatal protein, and lipid oxidation in a blood-injection model, but worsened the outcome by increasing perihematomal lesion volume, neuroinflammation, and edema in a collagenase-injection model [83, 84]. Conversely, HO-1 knockout exerted a beneficial effect on outcome in a collagenase-induced ICH model [85]. These disparate conclusions are partly explained by the diverse injury mechanisms between the blood- and collagenase-injection ICH models and the different distributions and expression timing of HO-1 and HO-2 [82].

6.2. Superoxide Dismutase

SOD is a key antioxidant enzyme that can detoxify to H2O2, which is further converted to H2O by catalase or GPx. According to the specific cellular distribution and metal cofactors, SOD can be categorized into copper/zinc SOD (SOD1) in the cytosol and manganese SOD (SOD2) in the mitochondria and extracellular SOD (SOD3) [86].

Experimental animal studies have shown that free radical scavenging systems are destroyed after ICH. More specifically, evidence suggests that the levels of SOD1 and SOD2 decrease as the ROS level increases 1 day after lysed erythrocyte infusion in rats [87]. Chen et al. confirmed the damaged antioxidant system with elevated lipid oxidation and decreased SOD activity 1 day after ICH in the ventricle [88]. Clinically, decreased plasma SOD and reduced total superoxide scavenger activities have been observed in ICH patients within 1 day after onset [89]. However, SOD1 was found to increase from 1 day after ICH induced by whole blood infusion and peak at 7 days in one study [90]. These contrasting results require further investigation.

Given the protective effect of SOD1, exogenous or endogenous enhancement of SOD1 has been attempted to alleviate the oxidative damage in ICH. SOD1 overexpression in transgenic rats was linked to reduced OS, BBB disruption, and neuronal apoptosis in a Hb-injection model [42]. A recent study on cell replacement therapy in ICH found that neural stem cells (NSCs) overexpressing SOD1 3 days after ICH could increase neuronal survival, indicating that SOD1 enhancement alone or combined with other treatments may be effective in ICH [91]. Moreover, SOD1 hyperexpression is also protective against the spontaneous occurrence of ICH in hypertensive mice by decreasing superoxide. Fewer occurrences, smaller size, and a lower number of ICH are observed in SOD1 transgenic mice than those in SOD1-deficient mice [92]. However, chemically synthesized SOD with extended half-life and improved BBB permeability was reported to have no effect in a collagenase-induced ICH model when intravenously administered [93]. This failure may be partially ascribed to the insufficient dosage used [93].

6.3. Nuclear Factor Erythroid-2 Related Factor 2 (Nrf2)

Nrf2 is a basic region-leucine zipper protein that controls the genomic regulator of the cellular antioxidant defense system, including the HO and SOD mentioned above [94]. ROS can activate the Keap1/Nrf2/ARE pathway to counteract oxidative damage after ICH as an adaptive response [90, 95, 96]. Keap1 is an OS sensor and negatively regulates Nrf2. Once exposed to ROS, Nrf2 dissociates from Keap1, translocates to the nucleus, and activates antioxidant response element (ARE) dependent cytoprotective genes that mediate cell survival [97]. Nrf2 increases significantly from 22 h and peaks at 8 h, whereas Keap1 shows a corresponding decrease in the perihematoma region in ICH rats [90]. These opposing expression changes suggest that Nrf2 is activated by Keap1 suppression after ICH. Moreover, the neuroprotection of Nrf2 indicates that Nrf2 knockout mice suffer more brain damage associated with the increased production of ROS and apoptosis [95, 96] and that Nrf2 activation could reduce peroxide formation by augmenting the antioxidative capacity and hematoma clearance after ICH [98]. Hence, Nrf2 activation by pharmaceutical drugs is a promising target to attenuate OS-induced brain injury following ICH.

Recently, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a fumaric acid ester that has been approved by the FDA as a treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) [99], demonstrated a beneficial effect by activating Nrf2 in rodent ICH models [100, 101]. In the study by Zhao et al., rats and mice, including Nrf2 knockouts, were initially subjected to intracerebral injection of blood and were then treated with DMF at a clinically relevant dose [100]. The results showed that treatment with DMF activated Nrf2, induced antioxidative enzymes, reduced brain edema, and ultimately enhanced neurological function. Additionally, enhanced hematoma resolution was observed in in vitro experiments by evaluating the phagocytic functions of primary microglia in culture. Iniaghe and colleagues found that upstream casein kinase 2 promoted Nrf2 translocation to exert a neuroprotective effect after DMF treatment [101]. These findings are important. Because DMF is currently approved for clinical use for MS, clinical translation will be relatively easy once the efficacy of DMF on ICH is confirmed in a clinical trial.

7. OS and Death Signaling Pathways in ICH

Numerous brain stroke studies have revealed that ROS/RNS not only directly oxidize cellular macromolecules, such as lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, associated with oxidative damage, but also are involved in the death signaling pathways. The molecular mechanisms of ROS-mediated cell death in brain ischemia have been thoroughly studied and reviewed elsewhere [29, 65]. Briefly, there are three major OS-mediated pathway activations, including the PI3K/Akt, MAPK/P38, and NK-κB pathways [29]. Cytochrome c-mediated apoptosis is another critical pathway that is mitochondria dependent [102]. These OS-induced death signaling pathways have also been discussed in subarachnoid hemorrhage [103].

Free radicals can induce apoptosis, and antioxidant therapy can reduce neuronal apoptosis after ICH [104, 105]. Few studies have focused on the precise mechanism of ROS/RNS-induced apoptosis or necrosis in the setting of ICH. In vitro Hb oxidative neurotoxicity was attenuated by inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC) and protein kinase CK2, suggesting that the PKC/CK2 pathway might participate in Hb-induced apoptosis, independent of HO activity [106]. However, the ERK pathway is involved in heme-mediated neuronal death by affecting HO-1 activity [107, 108]. The NF-κB pathway has also been detected in mediating Hb-induced apoptosis [108]. Moreover, the JNK pathway was reported to be activated following iron infusion, and the inhibition of JNK activation reduces apoptotic neuronal cell death and improves functional outcome [109, 110]. Other studies have shown that caspase cascades are activated by OS after hemoglobin explosion in primary neuronal cultures [36] and that ROS-induced apoptosis is related to cytochrome c release in the ICH model [95].

Although the ROS-mediated apoptotic signal pathway after ICH remains unclear, recent findings have shown that MMP-9 is an important mediator linking ROS/RNS with cell death following ICH [42, 95, 111, 112]. MMP-9 has been reported to elevate early, with a peak at 2-3 days, and is associated with apoptosis in the acute phase of ICH [113, 114]. The MMP inhibitor, GM6001, ameliorated neuronal death when administered within 72 h in a mouse ICH model [113]. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that Hb-induced ROS contributes to MMP-9 activation [42, 111]. NO derived from iNOS has also been reported to directly activate MMP-9 [112]. Moreover, a recent study by Ding et al. demonstrated that superoxide, NO, and their potent toxic metabolite peroxynitrite (ONOO) participate in the activation of MMP-9 via the following two mechanisms [115]. First, ONOO directly modifies pro-MMP through S-nitrosylation and then activates MMP-9. Second, NF-κB is indirectly upregulating and mediates the transcription of MMP-9 [116]. The strong evidence supporting MMP-9-mediated OS-induced cell death is based on the fact that scavenging or decomposing ROS/RNS significantly decreases MMP-9 activity and subsequent neuronal death. SOD1 overexpression or free radical scavenger U83836E successfully reduced OS, MMP-9 levels, and subsequent apoptosis after intrastriatal Hb injection [42, 111]. iNOS inhibition by osteopontin to prevent NO production also suppressed MMP-9 activation and rescued neuronal cells in the perihematoma region in a mouse collagenase-induced mouse ICH model [112]. Additionally, FeTPPS, a type of ONOO decomposition catalyst, decreased the levels of ONOO and MMP-9 activity, followed by reduced apoptosis, in a Hb-injection rat model [115]. Therefore, ROS/RNS and MMP-9 may constitute a crucial cell death pathway in ICH (Figure 1).

8. Therapeutic Targets and Clinical Trial

Given the abovementioned multiple sources of ROS generation and injured oxidant scavenger systems during OS-induced damage in ICH, several potentially therapeutic targets are discussed.

8.1. Blocking the Sources of ROS Production

Because intraparenchymal blood is the origin of many prooxidant toxins, including Hb, heme, and iron, it is reasonable to suppose that blood evacuation may reduce oxidative damage if the surgery results in no or minimal additional new injury. Hence, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for clot evacuation may represent a therapeutic strategy for the prevention of secondary oxidative damage. Animal studies have demonstrated that MIS alone or combined with other therapy can improve neurofunction with decreased oxidative injury and reduced apoptosis [117, 118]. More recently, clinical trials with small sample sizes investigating newly applied mechanical devices have reported promising outcomes [119, 120]. A multicenter, randomized, controlled study by our center comparing MIS with routine craniotomy is ongoing and involves 2448 ICH patients [121]. The clinical results will provide valuable information regarding the effect of MIS on the prognosis of patients with ICH.

Strategies targeting chelating individual prooxidants have been investigated. Haptoglobin is a blood protein primarily synthesized by hepatocytes that is also produced locally by oligodendrocytes in the brain. Haptoglobin binds extracellular Hb, preventing Hb-mediated oxidative damage [122]. Animals that are hypohaptoglobinemic exhibit more brain damage after ICH, whereas those overexpressing haptoglobin are relatively protected. Therefore, haptoglobin is a potential therapeutic target for the prevention of brain injury following ICH [123]. Sulforaphane, a Nrf2 activator, has been shown to elevate haptoglobin and reduce brain injury in an ICH animal model [96]. Hemopexin is another blood protein known to bind heme with high affinity [124]. Hemopexin-deficient mice show increased protein oxidation, tissue heme, and augmented ICH damage [125]. This protein may also be a target to alleviate brain injury after ICH. Additional work must be performed to further establish its efficacy.

Deferoxamine mesylate (DFO), an iron chelator, is a promising agent for ICH treatment that has been confirmed to be effective in many preclinical studies [126128]. The preliminary results in clinical trials are also encouraging. The phase I clinical trial has determined the tolerability, safety, and maximum tolerated dose of DFO in patients with ICH [129]. The phase II trial (High Dose Deferoxamine [HI-DEF] in Intracerebral Hemorrhage) is now underway, with the initial results indicating that DFO can reduce perihematoma edema, a major predictor of clinical outcome [130].

Other possible interventional targets include prooxidant enzymes, which are activated during ICH. Theoretically, inhibiting or deactivating these enzymes would be beneficial. However, controversy remains regarding the use of prooxidase inhibitors. For example, the beneficial effect of apocynin given 2 h after ICH is not achieved by its acting as an intracellular inhibitor of NADPH oxidase [71]. Tetrahydrobiopterin, which has been reported to limit the superoxide generation from NOS and chemically reduce superoxide, fails to reduce neurological deficits 24 h after ICH in mice [131]. One possible reason for this inefficacy is that many prooxidases consist of several isoforms, and their functions usually differ or can even be opposing [72, 132]. Completely, and not selectively, suppressing their activation would negate the benefits gained from some protective isoenzymes. It would be useful to identify the agent specifically acting on the detrimental isoform for a certain prooxidase.

As mentioned above, the various effects of heme oxygenases (HO-1 and HO-2) relevant to different ICH models indicate that they are challenging targets in the treatment of ICH [84, 133]. HO inhibitors may attenuate the neurotoxicity of the iron release from heme/hemin decomposition, but the toxicity of heme can enhance oxidative damage. A combination approach using two or more agents to increase HO activity while detoxifying iron with chelators has been proposed [82].

8.2. Scavenging Excessive ROS/RNS

Because of the impaired defense system after ICH, an alternative treatment is to neutralize the overproduced ROS and restore the normal function of endogenous antioxidant enzymes and scavengers. There is substantial support for the use of free radical scavengers in the management of brain injury secondary to ICH. Many free radical scavenging drugs have been evaluated in clinical trials to improve the outcome of ICH.

NXY-059 (disufenton sodium) is a free radical-trapping agent that significantly reduced disability and hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients in the SAINT-I clinical trial [134]. Accordingly, the efficacy of NXY-059 treatment was also explored in ICH patients in the Cerebral Hematoma and NXY Treatment trial (CHANT) [135]. However, the result was disappointing, with no treatment effect observed on functional outcome, despite tolerability and safety. Edaravone is another free radical scavenger that has been marketed for clinical use in acute ischemia stroke treatment since 2001, with preclinical success in ICH [136138]. Although good neurological function has been observed in preclinical studies, the clinical effect of edaravone in ICH remains unclear because of a lack of multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trials [139].

PPARγ agonists have been reported to play antioxidative roles by upregulating catalase and SOD directly or activating the Nrf2 pathway, and the Safety of Pioglitazone for Hematoma Resolution in ICH (SHRINC) clinical trial has been launched [140142]. The SHRINC study will provide important information regarding the safety and clinical outcome of PPARγ agonists in ICH.

9. Conclusion

OS has been established as an important pathogenesis of brain injury in ICH. Upon bleeding into the parenchyma, elevated glutamate, infiltrating inflammatory cells, and the metabolic products of erythrocyte lysis are the sources of active free radical generation. Free radical overproduction is accompanied by prooxidase activation and antioxidase inhibition, causing OS in ICH. The direct biomolecule oxygenation and indirect cell death signaling pathway activations by ROS/RNS are responsible for the OS-induced brain damage after ICH (Figure 2).

Future research should focus on developing new antioxidant compounds that can both block the sources of oxidative stress in ICH and neutralize the existing overproduction of free radicals. More importantly, efforts should be made to identify the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of OS on cell death in ICH. Additionally, because ICH-induced brain damage is ascribed to a complex pathogenic mechanism, focusing on one specific pathway, such as single antioxidant treatment, is not sufficient to achieve significant clinical improvement. Therefore, one drug with multifaceted function or combined surgical and pharmaceutical treatment or two or more drug interventions with distinctive mechanisms may be promising future treatments. For these reasons, the ultimate results of the clinical trials of DFO and pioglitazone in ICH are high anticipated because both drugs have multiple beneficial effects and reduce oxidative damage [140, 143].

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding this work.

Authors’ Contribution

Xin Hu and Chuanyuan Tao contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. J. C. Hemphill III, S. M. Greenberg, C. Anderson et al., “Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association,” Stroke, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2032–2060, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Fiorella, S. L. Zuckerman, I. S. Khan, N. K. Ganesh, and J. Mocco, “Intracerebral hemorrhage: a common and devastating disease in need of better treatment,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1136–1141, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Chaudhary, J. J. Gemmete, B. G. Thompson, G. Xi, and A. S. Pandey, “Iron—potential therapeutic target in hemorrhagic stroke,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 7–9, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Aronowski and X. Zhao, “Molecular pathophysiology of cerebral hemorrhage: secondary brain injury,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1781–1786, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Sinha, J. Das, P. B. Pal, and P. C. Sil, “Oxidative stress: the mitochondria-dependent and mitochondria-independent pathways of apoptosis,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1157–1180, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. H. Yana, X. Wang, and X. Zhu, “Mitochondrial defects and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 62, pp. 90–101, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Manzanero, T. Santro, and T. V. Arumugam, “Neuronal oxidative stress in acute ischemic stroke: Sources and contribution to cell injury,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 712–718, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Matés, J. A. Segura, F. J. Alonso, and J. Márquez, “Oxidative stress in apoptosis and cancer: an update,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 1649–1665, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Li, H. Worthmann, M. Deb, S. Chen, and K. Weissenborn, “Nitric oxide (NO) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): their pathophysiological role and involvement inintracerebral hemorrhage,” Neurological Research, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 541–548, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Ding, Y. Chen, S. Yang et al., “Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by hemoglobin in vivo: involvement of up-regulation of nitric oxide synthase and peroxynitrite formation,” Brain Research, vol. 1571, pp. 25–38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Nakamura, R. F. Keep, Y. Hua, S. Nagao, J. T. Hoff, and G. Xi, “Iron-induced oxidative brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 96, pp. 194–198, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Nakamura, R. F. Keep, Y. Hua, J. T. Hoff, and G. Xi, “Oxidative DNA injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” Brain Research, vol. 1039, no. 1-2, pp. 30–36, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Lekic, R. Hartman, H. Rojas et al., “Protective effect of melatonin upon neuropathology, striatal function, and memory ability after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 627–637, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Hama, Y. Ishihara, M. Watanabe, S. Danjo, Y. Nakamura, and K. Itoh, “Effects of sulfaphenazole after collagenase-induced experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rats,” Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1849–1853, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y.-C. Chen, C.-M. Chen, J.-L. Liu, S.-T. Chen, M.-L. Cheng, and D. T.-Y. Chiu, “Oxidative markers in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Leukocyte 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine as an independent predictor of the 30-day outcome: clinical article,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1184–1190, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. L. Alexandrova and M. P. Danovska, “Serum C-reactive protein and lipid hydroperoxides in predicting short-term clinical outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 247–252, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. D. Mendelow, B. A. Gregson, H. M. Fernandes et al., “Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9457, pp. 387–397, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. D. Mendelow, B. A. Gregson, E. N. Rowan, G. D. Murray, A. Gholkar, and P. M. Mitchell, “Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9890, pp. 397–408, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. A. Mould, J. R. Carhuapoma, J. Muschelli et al., “Minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation decreases perihematomal edema,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 627–634, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Naff, M. A. Williams, P. M. Keyl et al., “Low-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator enhances clot resolution in brain hemorrhage: the intraventricular hemorrhage thrombolysis trial,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3009–3016, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Barnes, D. F. Hanley, and J. R. Carhuapoma, “Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral haemorrhage,” Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 148–152, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. S. Balami and A. M. Buchan, “Complications of intracerebral haemorrhage,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Arima, C. S. Anderson, J. G. Wang et al., “Lower treatment blood pressure is associated with greatest reduction in hematoma growth after acute intracerebral hemorrhage,” Hypertension, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 852–858, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. M. Liu, B. Z. Shi, and J. S. Zhou, “Effects of thrombin on the secondary cerebral injury of perihematomal tissues of rats after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 4617–4626, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, J. Wang, R. Anne Stetler, and Q.-W. Yang, “Inflammation in intracerebral hemorrhage: from mechanisms to clinical translation,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 115, pp. 25–44, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. F. Keep, Y. Hua, and G. Xi, “Intracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 720–731, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. X.-Y. Xiong, J. Wang, Z.-M. Qian, and Q.-W. Yang, “Iron and intracerebral hemorrhage: from mechanism to translation,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 429–441, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Orrenius, V. Gogvadze, and B. Zhivotovsky, “Mitochondrial oxidative stress: implications for cell death,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 47, pp. 143–183, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Chen, H. Yoshioka, G. S. Kim et al., “Oxidative stress in ischemic brain damage: mechanisms of cell death and potential molecular targets for neuroprotection,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1505–1517, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Murakami, T. Kondo, M. Kawase et al., “Mitochondrial susceptibility to oxidative stress exacerbates cerebral infarction that follows permanent focal cerebral ischemia in mutant mice with manganese superoxide dismutase deficiency,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. N. Han, S.-J. Ding, T. Wu, and Y.-L. Zhu, “Correlation of free radical level and apoptosis after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats,” Neuroscience Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 351–358, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. R. Wagner, B. A. Packard, C. L. Hall et al., “Protein oxidation and heme oxygenase-1 induction in porcine white matter following intracerebral infusions of whole blood or plasma,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 154–160, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. Mantle, S. Siddique, F. Eddeb, and A. D. Mendelow, “Comparison of protein carbonyl and antioxidant levels in brain tissue from intracerebral haemorrhage and control cases,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 312, no. 1-2, pp. 185–190, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Aronowski and C. E. Hall, “New horizons for primary intracerebral hemorrhage treatment: experience from preclinical studies,” Neurological Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 268–279, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. S. Kim-Han, S. A. Kopp, L. L. Dugan, and M. N. Diringer, “Perihematomal mitochondrial dysfunction after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2457–2462, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. A. Swanson, “Intracerebral hematoma: beyond the mass lesion,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 10, p. 2445, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Q. Ma, S. Chen, Q. Hu, H. Feng, J. H. Zhang, and J. Tang, “NLRP3 inflammasome contributes to inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 209–219, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Hua, G. Xi, R. F. Keep, and J. T. Hoff, “Complement activation in the brain after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1016–1022, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. F. Regan and S. S. Panter, “Neurotoxicity of hemoglobin in cortical cell culture,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 219–222, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. Wang, T. Mori, T. Sumii, and E. H. Lo, “Hemoglobin-induced cytotoxicity in rat cerebral cortical neurons: caspase activation and oxidative stress,” Stroke, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1882–1888, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Qu, J. Chen, L. Benvenisti-Zarom, X. Ma, and R. F. Regan, “Effect of targeted deletion of the heme oxygenase-2 gene on hemoglobin toxicity in the striatum,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1466–1475, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Katsu, K. Niizuma, H. Yoshioka, N. Okami, H. Sakata, and P. H. Chan, “Hemoglobin-induced oxidative stress contributes to matrix metalloproteinase activation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in vivo,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1939–1950, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Yang, Y. Chen, X. Deng et al., “Hemoglobin-induced nitric oxide synthase overexpression and nitric oxide production contribute to blood-brain barrier disruption in the rat,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 352–363, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. F. Regan and B. Rogers, “Delayed treatment of hemoglobin neurotoxicity,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. P. Misra and I. Fridovich, “The generation of superoxide radical during the autoxidation of hemoglobin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 247, no. 21, pp. 6960–6962, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  46. F.-P. Huang, G. Xi, R. F. Keep, Y. Hua, A. Nemoianu, and J. T. Hoff, “Brain edema after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: role of hemoglobin degradation products,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 287–293, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. Goldstein, Z.-P. Teng, E. Zeserson, M. Patel, and R. F. Regan, “Hemin induces an iron-dependent, oxidative injury to human neuron-like cells,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. M. C. Gutteridge and A. Smith, “Antioxidant protection by haemopexin of haem-stimulated lipid peroxidation,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 256, no. 3, pp. 861–865, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. K. J. Kwon, J. N. Kim, M. K. Kim et al., “Neuroprotective effects of valproic acid against hemin toxicity: possible involvement of the down-regulation of heme oxygenase-1 by regulating ubiquitin-proteasomal pathway,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 240–250, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Cai, G.-S. Cho, C. Ju et al., “Activated microglia are less vulnerable to hemin toxicity due to nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of JNK and p38 MAPK activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 1314–1321, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Chen-Roetling, Y. Cai, X. Lu, and R. F. Regan, “Hemin uptake and release by neurons and glia,” Free Radical Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 200–205, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. X. Lu, J. Chen-Roetling, and R. F. Regan, “Systemic hemin therapy attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 70, pp. 245–251, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Caliaperumal, Y. Ma, and F. Colbourne, “Intra-parenchymal ferrous iron infusion causes neuronal atrophy, cell death and progressive tissue loss: implications for intracerebral hemorrhage,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 237, no. 2, pp. 363–369, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. H. Wu, T. Wu, X. Xu, J. Wang, and J. Wang, “Iron toxicity in mice with collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1243–1250, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. F. Zhao, Y. Hua, Y. He, R. F. Keep, and G. Xi, “Minocycline-induced attenuation of iron overload and brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 3587–3593, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. J. Ward, F. A. Zucca, J. H. Duyn, R. R. Crichton, and L. Zecca, “The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1045–1060, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. Wu, T. Wu, M. Li, and J. Wang, “Efficacy of the lipid-soluble iron chelator 2,2′-dipyridyl against hemorrhagic brain injury,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 388–394, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. J. Cui, H. Y. He, A. L. Yang et al., “Efficacy of deferoxamine in animal models of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e0127256, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Z. Yang, S. Zhong, Y. Liu, H. Shen, and B. Yuan, “Scavenger receptor SRA attenuates microglia activation and protects neuroinflammatory injury in intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 278, pp. 232–238, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y.-C. Wang, Y. Zhou, H. Fang et al., “Toll-like receptor 2/4 heterodimer mediates inflammatory injury in intracerebral hemorrhage,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 876–889, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. X. Hu, R. K. Leak, Y. Shi et al., “Microglial and macrophage polarization: new prospects for brain repair,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 11, pp. 56–64, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Wang and S. E. Tsirka, “Tuftsin fragment 1–3 is beneficial when delivered after the induction of intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 613–618, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. Matsuo, T. Kihara, M. Ikeda, M. Ninomiya, H. Onodera, and K. Kogure, “Role of neutrophils in radical production during ischemia and reperfusion of the rat brain: effect of neutrophil depletion on extracellular ascorbyl radical formation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 941–947, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. J. Wang, “Preclinical and clinical research on inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 463–477, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. H. Pradeep, J. B. Diya, S. Shashikumar, and G. K. Rajanikant, “Oxidative stress—assassin behind the ischemic stroke,” Folia Neuropathologica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. X. N. Tang, B. Cairns, N. Cairns, and M. A. Yenari, “Apocynin improves outcome in experimental stroke with a narrow dose range,” Neuroscience, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 556–562, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Tang, J. Liu, C. Zhou et al., “Role of NADPH oxidase in the brain injury of intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 1342–1350, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. T. Zia, A. Csiszar, and N. Labinskyy, “Oxidative-nitrosative stress in a rabbit pup model of germinal matrix hemorrhage: role of NAD(P)H oxidase,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2191–2198, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  69. K. Bedard, S. Whitehouse, and V. Jaquet, “Challenges, progresses, and promises for developing future NADPH oxidase therapeutics,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 355–357, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. Y. Wakisaka, J. D. Miller, Y. Chu et al., “Oxidative stress through activation of NAD(P)H oxidase in hypertensive mice with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1175–1185, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. E. Titova, R. P. Ostrowski, L. C. Sowers, J. H. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Effects of apocynin and ethanol on intracerebral haemorrhage-induced brain injury in rats,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 845–850, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. H. H. Chan and J. Y. H. Chan, “Brain stem NOS and ROS in neural mechanisms of hypertension,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 146–163, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, R. Strong, J. Zhang, J. C. Grotta, and J. Aronowski, “Distinct patterns of intracerebral hemorrhage-induced alterations in NF-κB subunit, iNOS, and COX-2 expression,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 652–663, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. Lu, K. R. Wagner, J. P. Broderick, and J. F. Clark, “Administration of S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline protects against brain injuries after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neuroscience, vol. 270, pp. 40–47, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. W. Kim, S.-H. Im, J.-Y. Kim, D.-E. Kim, G. T. Oh, and S.-W. Jeong, “Decreased brain edema after collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage in mice lacking the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. Laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 995–1000, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Ryu, H. Pyo, I. Jou, and E. Joe, “Thrombin induces NO release from cultured rat microglia via protein kinase C, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and NF-κB,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 39, pp. 29955–29959, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. S. Lin, Q. Yin, Q. Zhong et al., “Heme activates TLR4-mediated inflammatory injury via MyD88/TRIF signaling pathway in intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 9, article 46, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. D. Laird, C. Wakade, C. H. Alleyne Jr., and K. M. Dhandapani, “Hemin-induced necroptosis involves glutathione depletion in mouse astrocytes,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1103–1114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. L. Kiedrowski, E. Costa, and J. T. Wroblewski, “Glutamate receptor agonists stimulate nitric oxide synthase in primary cultures of cerebellar granule cells,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 335–341, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. S. R. Robinson, T. N. Dang, R. Dringen, and G. M. Bishop, “Hemin toxicity: a preventable source of brain damage following hemorrhagic stroke,” Redox Report, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 228–235, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. Muñoz-Sánchez and M. E. Chánez-Cárdenas, “A review on hemeoxygenase-2: focus on cellular protection and oxygen response,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2014, Article ID 604981, 16 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. J. Chen-Roetling, X. Lu, and R. F. Regan, “Targeting heme oxygenase after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Therapeutic Targets for Neurological Diseases, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e474, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. J. Wang and S. Doré, “Heme oxygenase 2 deficiency increases brain swelling and inflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neuroscience, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 1133–1141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. J. Chen-Roetling, Y. Cai, and R. F. Regan, “Neuroprotective effect of heme oxygenase-2 knockout in the blood injection model of intracerebral hemorrhage,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 7, article 561, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. J. Wang and S. Doré, “Heme oxygenase-1 exacerbates early brain injury after intracerebral haemorrhage,” Brain, vol. 130, part 6, no. 6, pp. 1643–1652, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. I. Batinic-Haberle, A. Tovmasyan, E. R. H. Roberts, Z. Vujaskovic, K. W. Leong, and I. Spasojevic, “SOD therapeutics: latest insights into their structure-activity relationships and impact on the cellular redox-based signaling pathways,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 2372–2415, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. J. Wu, Y. Hua, R. F. Keep, T. Schallert, J. T. Hoff, and G. Xi, “Oxidative brain injury from extravasated erythrocytes after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Brain Research, vol. 953, no. 1-2, pp. 45–52, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. Z. Chen, J. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Guo, G. Zhu, and H. Feng, “Neuroprotective effects of edaravone after intraventricular hemorrhage in rats,” NeuroReport, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 635–640, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. R. Aygul, B. Demircan, F. Erdem, H. Ulvi, A. Yildirim, and F. Demirbas, “Plasma values of oxidants and antioxidants in acute brain hemorrhage: role of free radicals in the development of brain injury,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 108, no. 1–3, pp. 43–52, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. H. Shang, D. Yang, W. Zhang et al., “Time course of Keap1-Nrf2 pathway expression after experimental intracerebral haemorrhage: correlation with brain oedema and neurological deficit,” Free Radical Research, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 368–375, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. Wakai, H. Sakata, P. Narasimhan, H. Yoshioka, H. Kinouchi, and P. H. Chan, “Transplantation of neural stem cells that overexpress SOD1 enhances amelioration of intracerebral hemorrhage in mice,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 441–449, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. Y. Wakisaka, Y. Chu, J. D. Miller, G. A. Rosenberg, and D. D. Heistad, “Critical role for copper/zinc-superoxide dismutase in preventing spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage during acute and chronic hypertension in mice,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 790–797, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. E. Titova, R. P. Ostrowski, J. Rowe, W. Chen, J. H. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Effects of superoxide dismutase and catalase derivates on intracerebral hemorrhage-induced brain injury in rats,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 105, pp. 33–35, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. X. Zhao and J. Aronowski, “Nrf2 to pre-condition the brain against injury caused by products of hemolysis after ICH,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 71–75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. J. Wang, J. Fields, C. Zhao et al., “Role of Nrf2 in protection against intracerebral hemorrhage injury in mice,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 408–414, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. X. Zhao, G. Sun, J. Zhang et al., “Transcription factor Nrf2 protects the brain from damage produced by intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 3280–3286, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. Qaisiya, C. D. Coda Zabetta, C. Bellarosa, and C. Tiribelli, “Bilirubin mediated oxidative stress involves antioxidant response activation via Nrf2 pathway,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 512–520, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. X. Zhao, G. Sun, S. M. Ting et al., “Cleaning up after ICH: the role of Nrf2 in modulating microglia function and hematoma clearance,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 144–152, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. R. Gold, R. A. Linker, and M. Stangel, “Fumaric acid and its esters: an emerging treatment for multiple sclerosis with antioxidative mechanism of action,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. X. Zhao, G. Sun, J. Zhang, S. M. Ting, N. Gonzales, and J. Aronowski, “Dimethyl fumarate protects brain from damage produced by intracerebral hemorrhage by mechanism involving Nrf2,” Stroke, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1923–1928, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. L. O. Iniaghe, P. R. Krafft, D. W. Klebe, E. K. Omogbai, J. H. Zhang, and J. Tang, “Dimethyl fumarate confers neuroprotection by casein kinase 2 phosphorylation of Nrf2 in murine intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 82, pp. 349–358, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. P. H. Chan, “Mitochondria and neuronal death/survival signaling pathways in cerebral ischemia,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1943–1949, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. R. E. Ayer and J. H. Zhang, “Oxidative stress in subarachnoid haemorrhage: significance in acute brain injury and vasospasm,” Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum, no. 104, pp. 33–41, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. H. Lu, J. Shen, X. Song et al., “Protective effect of pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) in rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 921–930, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. C. F. Chang, S. Cho, and J. Wang, “(-)-Epicatechin protects hemorrhagic brain via synergistic Nrf2 pathways,” Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 258–271, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. J. Chen-Roetling, Z. Li, and R. F. Regan, “Hemoglobin neurotoxicity is attenuated by inhibitors of the protein kinase CK2 independent of heme oxygenase activity,” Current Neurovascular Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. J. Chen-Roetling, Z. Li, M. Chen, O. O. Awe, and R. F. Regan, “Heme oxygenase activity and hemoglobin neurotoxicity are attenuated by inhibitors of the MEK/ERK pathway,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 922–928, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. L. Benvenisti-Zarom, J. Chen-Roetling, and R. F. Regan, “Inhibition of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway attenuates heme oxygenase-1 expression and heme-mediated neuronal injury,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 230–234, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. Ohnishi, H. Katsuki, S. Fujimoto, M. Takagi, T. Kume, and A. Akaike, “Involvement of thrombin and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in hemorrhagic brain injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. S. Wan, R. Zhan, S. Zheng, Y. Hua, and G. Xi, “Activation of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhage: the role of iron,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 100–105, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. E. Tejima, B.-Q. Zhao, K. Tsuji et al., “Astrocytic induction of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and edema in brain hemorrhage,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 460–468, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. B. Wu, Q. Ma, H. Suzuki et al., “Recombinant osteopontin attenuates brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage in mice,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. J. Wang and S. E. Tsirka, “Neuroprotection by inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases in a mouse model of intracerebral haemorrhage,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 1622–1633, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. J. J. Chang, B. A. Emanuel, W. J. Mack, G. Tsivgoulis, and A. V. Alexandrov, “Matrix metalloproteinase-9: dual role and temporal profile in intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2498–2505, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. R. Ding, L. Feng, L. He et al., “Peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst prevents matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation and neurovascular injury after hemoglobin injection into the caudate nucleus of rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 297, pp. 182–193, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  116. Y. Suofu, J. Clark, J. Broderick et al., “Peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst prevents matrix metalloproteinase activation and neurovascular injury after prolonged cerebral ischemia in rats,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 1266–1276, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. G. Wu, C. Li, L. Wang, Y. Mao, and Z. Hong, “Minimally invasive procedures for evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage reduces perihematomal glutamate content, blood-brain barrier permeability and brain edema in rabbits,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 118–126, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. X. C. Liu, L. Y. Jing, M. F. Yang et al., “Enhanced neuroprotection of minimally invasive surgery joint local cooling lavage against ICH-induced inflammation injury and apoptosis in rats,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. C. J. Przybylowski, D. Ding, R. M. Starke, R. W. Crowley, and K. C. Liu, “Endoport-assisted surgery for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1727–1732, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. A. M. Spiotta, D. Fiorella, J. Vargas et al., “Initial multicenter technical experience with the Apollo device for minimally invasive intracerebral hematoma evacuation,” Neurosurgery, vol. 11, supplement 2, pp. 243–251, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. J. Zheng, H. Li, R. Guo et al., “Minimally invasive surgery treatment for the patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (MISTICH): protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled trial,” BMC Neurology, vol. 14, no. 1, article 206, 6 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. X. Zhao, S. Song, G. Sun et al., “Neuroprotective role of haptoglobin after intracerebral hemorrhage,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 50, pp. 15819–15827, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. X. Zhao, S. Song, G. Sun et al., “Cytoprotective role of haptoglobin in brain after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum, no. 111, pp. 107–112, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. P. Hahl, T. Davis, C. Washburn, J. T. Rogers, and A. Smith, “Mechanisms of neuroprotection by hemopexin: modeling the control of heme and iron homeostasis in brain neurons in inflammatory states,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. L. Chen, X. Zhang, J. Chen-Roetling, and R. F. Regan, “Increased striatal injury and behavioral deficits after intracerebral hemorrhage in hemopexin knockout mice,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1159–1167, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. Q. Xie, Y. Gu, Y. Hua, W. Liu, R. F. Keep, and G. Xi, “Deferoxamine attenuates white matter injury in a piglet intracerebral hemorrhage model,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 290–292, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. M. Okauchi, Y. Hua, R. F. Keep, L. B. Morgenstern, T. Schallert, and G. Xi, “Deferoxamine treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage in aged rats: therapeutic time window and optimal duration,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 375–382, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. T. Hatakeyama, M. Okauchi, Y. Hua, R. F. Keep, and G. Xi, “Deferoxamine reduces neuronal death and hematoma lysis after intracerebral hemorrhage in aged rats,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 546–553, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. M. Selim, S. Yeatts, J. N. Goldstein et al., “Safety and tolerability of deferoxamine mesylate in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3067–3074, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. S. D. Yeatts, Y. Y. Palesch, C. S. Moy, and M. Selim, “High dose deferoxamine in intracerebral hemorrhage (Hi-Def) trial: rationale, design, and methods,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. R. Tsuchiyama, T. Sozen, E. Titova, J. H. Zhang, and J. Tang, “The effects of tetrahydrobiopterin on intracerebral hemorrhage-induced brain injury in mice,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 106, pp. 155–157, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  132. X. N. Tang, B. Cairns, J. Y. Kim, and M. A. Yenari, “NADPH oxidase in stroke and cerebrovascular disease,” Neurological Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 338–345, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. J. Chen-Roetling, W. Song, H. M. Schipper, C. S. Regan, and R. F. Regan, “Astrocyte overexpression of heme oxygenase-1 improves outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1093–1098, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. K. R. Lees, J. A. Zivin, T. Ashwood et al., “NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 6, pp. 588–600, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. P. D. Lyden, A. Shuaib, K. R. Lees et al., “Safety and tolerability of NXY-059 for acute intracerebral hemorrhage: the CHANT trial,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2262–2269, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. E. Otomo, H. Tohgi, K. Kogure et al., “Effect of a novel free radical scavenger, edaravone (MCI-186), on acute brain infarction. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study at multicenters,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 222–229, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. H. Shang, D. Cui, D. Yang, S. Liang, W. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “The radical scavenger edaravone improves neurologic function and perihematomal glucose metabolism after acute intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 215–222, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. T. Nakamura, Y. Kuroda, S. Yamashita et al., “Edaravone attenuates brain edema and neurologic deficits in a rat model of acute intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 463–469, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. J. Yang, X. Cui, J. Li, C. Zhang, J. Zhang, and M. Liu, “Edaravone for acute stroke: meta-analyses of data from randomized controlled trials,” Developmental Neurorehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 330–335, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. X. R. Zhao, N. Gonzales, and J. Aronowski, “Pleiotropic role of PPARγ in intracerebral hemorrhage: an intricate system involving Nrf2, RXR, and NF-κB,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 357–366, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. X. Zhao, Y. Zhang, R. Strong, J. C. Grotta, and J. Aronowski, “15d-Prostaglandin J2 activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, promotes expression of catalase, and reduces inflammation, behavioral dysfunction, and neuronal loss after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 811–820, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. N. R. Gonzales, J. Shah, N. Sangha et al., “Design of a prospective, dose-escalation study evaluating the Safety of Pioglitazone for Hematoma Resolution in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (SHRINC),” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 388–396, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. M. Selim, “Deferoxamine mesylate: a new hope for intracerebral hemorrhage: from bench to clinical trials,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. S90–S91, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Xin Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2001 Views | 777 Downloads | 41 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.