Lower Serum Caveolin-1 Is Associated with Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Zhang, Jun; Zhu, Wusheng; Xiao, Lulu; Cao, Qinqin; Zhang, Hao; Wang, Huaiming; Ye, Zusen; Hao, Yonggang; Dai, Qiliang; Sun, Wen; Xiong, Yunyun; Liu, Xinfeng; Ye, Ruidong; Xu, Gelin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9026787

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Redox Imbalance and Stroke

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 9026787 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9026787

Lower Serum Caveolin-1 Is Associated with Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Jun Zhang,¹Wusheng Zhu,¹Lulu Xiao,¹Qinqin Cao,¹Hao Zhang,¹Huaiming Wang,²Zusen Ye,³Yonggang Hao,³Qiliang Dai,¹Wen Sun,¹Yunyun Xiong,¹and Xinfeng Liu¹ et al.

Academic Editor: David Pattison

Received17 Oct 2015

Revised02 Feb 2016

Accepted13 Mar 2016

Published28 Mar 2016

Abstract

Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) plays pivotal roles in the endothelial damage following stroke. The present study aimed to investigate whether serum Cav-1 level is associated with the presence of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To this end, 156 patients were consecutively enrolled. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging was analyzed to determine the surrogates of cSVD, including cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), silent lacunar infarcts (SLIs), and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with low Cav-1 level had a higher risk of CMBs than patients with high Cav-1 level (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.77–9.30). However, there was no relationship between Cav-1 and the presence of SLIs or WMHs. When CMBs were stratified by location and number, a similar association was found in patients with deep or infratentorial CMBs (OR: 4.04, 95% CI: 1.59–10.25) and with multiple CMBs (OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 1.16–8.72). These results suggest lower serum Cav-1 levels may be associated with CMBs, especially those that are multiple and located in deep brain or infratentorial structures, in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cav-1 may be involved in the pathophysiology of CMBs, and may act as a potential target for treating cSVD.

1. Introduction

Caveolae are small flask-shaped invaginations of the cell plasma membrane and are particularly abundant in endothelial cells. They participate in many intra- and intercellular activities, such as endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and signal transduction [1, 2]. As a key structural protein of caveolae domains, caveolin-1 (Cav-1) participates in regulating blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, oxidative stress, and counteracting neuroinflammatory process [3, 4]. In laboratory stroke investigations, Cav-1 levels have been associated with neuronal apoptosis, BBB disruption, infarction enlargement, and functional deterioration [5, 6], yet there has been no clinical research to confirm these relationships to date.

Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is mainly characterized by cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), silent lacunar infarcts (SLIs), and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7]. These trinity imaging surrogates have been associated with increased risk of subsequent cerebrovascular events and unfavorable functional outcomes in ischemic stroke survivors [8–12]. Although potential unknown mechanisms are thought to participate in the development of cSVD, previous studies demonstrated that inflammatory cascade activated by endothelial lesion and BBB damage is involved in the initiation and progression of cSVD [7, 13]. Considering a salient role of Cav-1 in these pathophysiologic processes, we hypothesized that Cav-1 levels might be related to the presence of cSVD. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the association between serum Cav-1 levels and cSVD detected and measured with MRI in a cohort of patients with ischemic stroke.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects

From January 2013 to December 2014, patients with ischemic stroke registered in Nanjing Stroke Registry Program (NSRP) were prospectively enrolled. NSRP has been described previously in detail [14]. Patients were enrolled in this study if they are (1) with first-ever ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset and (2) aged 18 years or older. We excluded patients if they are (1) with traumatic brain injury or brain surgery, (2) with chronic kidney diseases, (3) with malignant tumor, and (4) currently with infectious disease. All patients provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Jinling Hospital.

According to the inclusion criteria, there were 172 patients with first-ever ischemic stroke within 24 hours of symptom onset and 18 years or older. The ischemic stroke was confirmed by professional neurologist with acute stroke syndrome and subsequent imaging examination. During this period, 7 patients refused to participate. Additionally, 2 patients with traumatic brain injury or brain surgery, 2 with chronic kidney disease, 2 with malignant tumor, and 3 with infectious disease were excluded. Accordingly, a total of 156 patients were included in final analysis.

2.2. MRI Protocols

Cranial MRI imaging was performed with a 3.0 T Trio MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel head coil. The imaging protocol consisted of axial T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, and DWI sequences were performed according to previously standardized procedures and parameters: T1-weighted: repetition time (TR), 350 ms; echo time (TE), 2.46 ms; T2-weighted: TR, 4000 ms; TE, 98 ms; T2-FLAIR: TR, 7000 ms; TE, 87 ms; DWI: TR, 3000 ms; TE, 91 ms. SWI was performed with the following parameters: matrix size, 512 × 254 × 72; field of view (FOV), 230 × 115 × 144 mm³; TR, 56 ms; TE, 25 ms; flip angle, 20°. The detail has been described in our previous study [15].

2.3. Cranial MRI Surrogates of cSVD

The MRI surrogates of cSVD of interest were CMBs, SLIs, and WMHs. Imaging results from all included patients () were assessed by 2 raters who were blind to the clinical information. Disagreements were resolved by consultation with a third reviewer. CMBs were defined as small round hypointensity areas (2–10 mm in diameter) on SWI sequence [16, 17] and were categorized according to their locations as lobar (cortical gray and subcortical or periventricular white matter), deep (deep gray matter: basal ganglia and thalamus, and the white matter of the corpus callosum, internal, eternal, and extreme capsule), and infratentorial (brainstem and cerebellum). Furthermore, patients with CMBs were dichotomized according to the presence or absence of microbleeds in deep or infratentorial locations. Those with microbleeds in deep or infratentorial locations were defined as “deep or infratentorial microbleeds” and those without were defined as “strictly lobar microbleeds” [18]. CMBs were further categorized according to their numbers as absent, single (1 CMB), and multiple (≥2 CMBs). CMBs mimics, such as calcifications, iron deposits, and flow voids in pial blood vessel were carefully excluded [16, 17]. Interrater reliability for the presence of CMBs was 0.85.

SLIs were defined as focal lesions (3–15 mm in diameter), accompanied by hypointensity on T1 image, corresponding hyperintensity on T2 image, and hypointensity with perifocal high signal on T2 FLAIR image [19]. WMHs were defined as hyperintensity surrounding the ventricles and in the deep white matter on FLARI images, classified by a modified Fazekas rating scale. Periventricular hyperintensity was graded as 0 = absence, 1 = “caps” or pencil-thin lining, 2 = smooth “halo,” or 3 = irregular extending into the deep white matter. Deep white matter hyperintensity was rated as 0 = absence, 1 = punctate foci, 2 = beginning confluence of foci, or 3 = large confluent areas [20]. The presence of WMHs was defined when grade is ≥1 of any location. Interrater reliability for the presence of SLIs and WMHs was 0.78 and 0.81, respectively.

2.4. Cerebrovascular Risk Factors

Baseline characteristics of patients were collected at the time of admission. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medications. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed if either the fasting glucose level was ≥126 mg/dL or the participants were currently being treated with antidiabetic agents. Hyperlipidemia was defined as an elevated level of triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL), total cholesterol (≥220 mg/dL), or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (≥140 mg/dL) or having received lipid-lowering drugs. Coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction were all recognized as heart disease. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m²). Smoking was defined as currently smoking or having quit for ≤2 years. Drinking was defined as current alcohol drinking ≥20 g/d.

2.5. Serum Cav-1 Measurement

Morning blood samples for measurements of glucose, lipid, fibrinogen, and Cav-1 levels were obtained after an overnight fast within 48 hours of symptom onset. Blood was centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 minutes within 30 minutes of collection, and the serum was stored at −80°C. Cav-1 levels were measured by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Uscn Life Science, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The intra-assay coefficient was <10%.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) and compared with Student’s -test or Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between Cav-1 and cSVD by calculating adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cav-1 levels were divided into dichotomy with cut points of 5.25 ng/mL. Variables at a level of in univariable comparison and those being reported previously as potential confounders were adjusted in multivariable logistic regression, which were first adjusted for age and sex (Model 1) and then for all potential confounders (Model 2). A two-tailed value of 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All data analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

A total of 156 patients (68.6%, male; mean age, years) were enrolled in the study. The baseline characteristics of the patients were presented in Table 1. Overall, 104 (66.7%) patients had hypertension, 37 (23.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus, 52 (33.3%) patients had hyperlipidemia, and 22 (14.1%) patients had heart disease. The mean ± SD (range) Cav-1 level of these patients was (1.67–12.32) ng/mL.

Based on MRI results, there were 57 (36.5%) patients with CMBs, 82 (52.6%) patients with SLIs, and 95 (60.9%) patients with WMHs. Univariable comparison showed that patients with CMBs were older than patients without ( versus , ). Patients with CMBs had higher incidence of hypertension (77.2% versus 60.6%, ) and higher systolic blood pressure (140 versus 135 mmHg, ) at admission. The levels of blood fibrinogen were higher ( versus mg/dL, ) in patients with CMBs than in patients without. Patients with CMBs had lower serum Cav-1 levels ( versus ng/mL, ) than patients without. For ischemic cSVD, patients with SLIs were older than patients without ( versus , ). Systolic blood pressure at admission was higher in patients with SLIs (140 versus 137 mmHg, ) than in patients without. Similarly, patients with WMHs were older than patients without ( versus , ). And patients with WMHs had higher prevalence of hypertension (73.7% versus 55.7%, ) and higher systolic blood pressure at admission (140 versus 134 mmHg, ) than patients without. However, there were no significant differences concerning the levels of serum Cav-1 between patients with SLIs and patients without ( versus ng/mL, ) or between patients with WMHs and patients without ( versus ng/mL, , Figure 1).

3.2. Relationship between Cav-1 and cSVD

After adjusting for age and sex (model 1), presence of CMBs in patients with low Cav-1 level (≤5.25 ng/mL) was higher (OR = 3.69, 95% CI 1.78–7.64, ) than that in patients with high Cav-1 level (>5.25 ng/mL). After adjusting for more confounders (model 2), presence of CMBs was still higher in patients with low Cav-1 level (OR = 4.05, 95% CI 1.77–9.30, ) than that in patients with high Cav-1 level. However, there were no significant differences between Cav-1 and SLIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 0.77–3.36, , Model 2) or WMHs (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.36–1.67, , Model 2), respectively (Table 2).

3.3. Relationship between Cav-1 and CMBs Subgroups

Of the 57 patients with CMBs, 22 (38.6%) were categorized as being with single CMBs and 35 (61.4%) as being with multiple CMBs. CMBs were more frequently observed in deep brain or infratentorial structures (42/57, 73.7%) than in lobar areas (15/57, 26.3%). When CMBs were categorized according to their locations, patients with CMBs in deep brain or infratentorial structures had significantly lower levels of Cav-1 than patients without CMBs ( versus ng/mL, ). However, there was no significant difference concerning Cav-l levels between patients with lobar CMBs and patients without CMBs ( versus ng/mL, ). When CMBs were categorized according to their numbers, patients with multiple CMBs had lower levels of Cav-1 than patients without CMBs ( versus ng/mL, , Figure 2).

Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of deep or infratentorial CMBs was higher in patients with low Cav-1 levels than that in patients with high Cav-1 level (OR = 3.54, 95% CI 1.58–7.92, , Model 1). After adjusting for more confounders, the association still existed (OR = 4.04, 95% CI 1.59–10.25, , Model 2). Similar association was found between Cav-1 and the presence of multiple CMBs (OR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.16–8.72, , Model 2). However, no association was found between Cav-1 and strictly lobar CMBs (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.43–5.60, , Model 2) or single CMBs (OR = 3.03, 95% CI 0.95–9.72, , Model 2), respectively (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study found that lower serum Cav-1 level is associated with the presence of CMBs in acute ischemic stroke. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with low Cav-1 level had a 3-fold increased risk of CMBs compared with patients with high Cav-1 level. When CMBs were categorized according to number and location, the low serum Cav-1 levels were independently associated with multiple CMBs and deep or infratentorial CMBs.

Growing evidence has suggested that Cav-1 is involved in the regulation of lipoprotein transcytosis across endothelial cells and in the regulation of vascular inflammation and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Cav-1 knockout (KO) ischemic stroke models exhibited increased BBB permeability, redox imbalance, and amplified proinflammatory cytokines [3, 21]. When Cav-1 was downregulated, there was an increase of matrix metalloproteinases- (MMP-) 2/9 activity, which can hydrolyze BBB extracellular matrix and tight junction (TJ) proteins and subsequently leads to the BBB opening [22]. As such, decreased Cav-1 expression can increase the activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), which increases NO production in endothelial cells and leads to remarkably endothelial and microvascular hyperpermeability [23, 24]. On the other hand, downregulation of Cav-1 was reported to have amplified proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-9 [3, 19]. Deficiency of Cav-1 presented altered redox homeostasis and promoted a significant increase of oxidative stress in endothelial cell, which possibly reflects a role of Cav-1 in mitochondrial function [25]. These molecular mechanisms are also supposed to be associated with the occurrence of cSVD. As found in this clinical study, lower serum Cav-1 levels were associated with the presence of CMBs.

CMBs, as a novel image surrogate of cSVD, have been proved to be associated with endothelial dysfunction, BBB leakage, inflammation activation, and oxidative stress [7, 13, 19, 26]. Histopathological studies demonstrate that the spatial distribution of CMBs may reflect specific underlying vascular pathological changes, in particular cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and hypertensive vasculopathy [17]. These two disorders are characterized by different patterns of microbleeds distribution: hypertensive vasculopathy is usually associated with CMBs in the basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum [27], whereas CAA is associated with lobar distribution [28]. In this study, when CMBs were categorized according to their locations, the lower serum Cav-1 levels were independently associated with deep or infratentorial CMBs but not with lobar CMBs. These findings might partly indicate that Cav-1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertensive vasculopathy rather than CAA. Recent studies also have revealed that Cav-1 was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension and was upregulated in high-salt diet-induced endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in type 1 diabetes [29, 30]. However, no evidence demonstrated that there was a relationship between Cav-1 and CAA-related pathology [31], which may partly explain our results.

For ischemic cSVD, there were no remarkable associations between serum Cav-1 levels and SLIs or WMHs in this study. When we repeated the analysis for WMHs with Fazekas 0-1 versus Fazekas 2-3, there was still no significant association (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.69–3.46, , Model 2). Although CMBs, SLIs, and WMHs are common and representative surrogates of cSVD, there might be differences in risk factors and specific pathophysiology between ischemic and hemorrhagic cSVD [13, 32, 33]. CMBs are more likely to reflect BBB disruption and induced oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, while SILs and WMHs are more likely to be associated with ischemic damage of small perforating arterial or emboli. Some inflammatory biomarker profiles were observed with different levels between hemorrhagic and ischemic MRI surrogates of cSVD [7]. As a plasma membrane cell protein, Cav-1 plays a significant role in regulating endothelial function and BBB permeability. Other experiments revealed that deficiency of Cav-1 appeared atheroprotective and decreased plague area. This phenotype was attributed mainly to defective transendothelial migration of low-density lipoprotein [34, 35]. In the current study, although the levels of serum Cav-1 were higher in SLIs and WMHs groups than those in corresponding negative group of each surrogate, there were no significant differences concerning the levels of serum Cav-1 between patients with SLIs and patients without SLIs or between patients with WMHs and patients without WMHs. This finding deserves confirmation by further studies.

There are limitations which should be emphasized when interpreting the results. First, the sample size is relatively small, which might jeopardize the power of the study, especially when evaluating the effects of CMBs subgroups. Second, blood samples were obtained at one time point within 48 hours of symptom onset. A serial observation of the dynamic changes of Cav-1 levels is lacking. Third, in addition to these typically MRI surrogates, enlarged perivascular space and brain atrophy have been recently suggested as constituents of cSVD, which also deserve further study.

In conclusion, lower serum Cav-1 levels may be associated with CMBs, especially those that are multiple or located in deep brain or infratentorial structures, in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Before being generalized to other populations, these results warrant further studies to establish Cav-1 as a biomarker for predicting CMBs. Observational studies focusing on elderly without stroke and interventional studies in animals (such as gene knockout studies) are needed to determine whether Cav-1 is really a marker of CMBs and a potential target for treating cerebral small vessel disease.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no financial competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31300900, 81471182, 81200892, and 31100784). The authors wish to thank Mrs. Ying Lin and Mrs. Zhaojun Wang for their assistance in sample collection and Dr. Xiaohao Zhang for performing sample analysis.

References

G. Sowa, “Caveolae, caveolins, cavins, and endothelial cell function: new insights,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 2, article 120, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Parton and M. A. Del Pozo, “Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 98–112, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xu, R. Guo, Y. Xie, M. Ma, R. Ye, and X. Liu, “Caveolae: molecular insights and therapeutic targets for stroke,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 633–650, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-L. Zhao, J.-N. Song, and M. Zhang, “Role of caveolin-1 in the biology of the blood-brain barrier,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 247–254, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-F. Jasmin, S. Malhotra, M. Singh Dhallu, I. Mercier, D. M. Rosenbaum, and M. P. Lisanti, “Caveolin-1 deficiency increases cerebral ischemic injury,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 721–729, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-F. Chang, S.-F. Chen, T.-S. Lee, H.-F. Lee, S.-F. Chen, and S.-K. Shyue, “Caveolin-1 deletion reduces early brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1749–1761, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shoamanesh, S. R. Preis, A. S. Beiser et al., “Inflammatory biomarkers, cerebral microbleeds, and small vessel disease: Framingham heart study,” Neurology, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 825–832, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, A. S. Puri, M. A. Khan, R. P. Goddeau Jr., and N. Henninger, “Leukoaraiosis predicts a poor 90-day outcome after endovascular stroke therapy,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2070–2075, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Leonards, N. Ipsen, U. Malzahn, J. B. Fiebach, M. Endres, and M. Ebinger, “White matter lesion severity in mild acute ischemic stroke patients and functional outcome after 1 year,” Stroke, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 3046–3051, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-H. Lee, W.-S. Ryu, and J.-K. Roh, “Cerebral microbleeds are a risk factor for warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neurology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dannenberg, J. F. Scheitz, M. Rozanski et al., “Number of cerebral microbleeds and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2900–2905, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-S. Lim, K.-S. Hong, G.-M. Kim et al., “Cerebral microbleeds and early recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack: results from the Korean Transient Ischemic Attack Expression Registry,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 301–308, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Wardlaw, C. Smith, and M. Dichgans, “Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 483–497, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, G. Xu, W. Wu, R. Zhang, Q. Yin, and W. Zhu, “Subtypes and one-year survival of first-ever stroke in Chinese patients: the Nanjing Stroke Registry,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 22, no. 2-3, pp. 130–136, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Sun, C. Yuan, W. Liu et al., “Asymptomatic cerebral microbleeds in adult patients with moyamoya disease: a prospective cohort study with 2 years of follow-up,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 469–475, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Wardlaw, E. E. Smith, G. J. Biessels et al., “Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 822–838, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Greenberg, M. W. Vernooij, C. Cordonnier et al., “Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Vernooij, A. van der Lugt, M. A. Ikram et al., “Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: the Rotterdam Scan Study,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 14, pp. 1208–1214, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Miwa, M. Tanaka, S. Okazaki, S. Furukado, M. Sakaguchi, and K. Kitagawa, “Relations of blood inflammatory marker levels with cerebral microbleeds,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3202–3206, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fazekas, J. B. Chawluk, A. Alavi, H. I. Hurtig, and R. A. Zimmerman, “MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 351–356, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. R. Niesman, J. M. Schilling, L. A. Shapiro et al., “Traumatic brain injury enhances neuroinflammation and lesion volume in caveolin deficient mice,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 11, article 39, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gu, C. M. Dee, and J. Shen, “Interaction of free radicals, matrix metalloproteinases and caveolin-1 impacts blood-brain barrier permeability,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1216–1231, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Siddiqui, Y. A. Komarova, S. M. Vogel et al., “Caveolin-1-eNOS signaling promotes p190RhoGAP-A nitration and endothelial permeability,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 193, no. 5, pp. 841–850, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Schubert, P. G. Frank, S. E. Woodman et al., “Microvascular hyperpermeability in caveolin-1 (-/-) knock-out mice. Treatment with a specific nitric-oxide synthase inhibitor, L-name, restores normal microvascular permeability in Cav-1 null mice,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 42, pp. 40091–40098, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Shiroto, N. Romero, T. Sugiyama et al., “Caveolin-1 is a critical determinant of autophagy, metabolic switching, and oxidative stress in vascular endothelium,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e87871, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xiao, W. Sun, W. Lan et al., “Correlation between cerebral microbleeds and S100B/RAGE in acute lacunar stroke patients,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 340, no. 1-2, pp. 208–212, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fazekas, R. Kleinert, G. Roob et al., “Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2^∗- weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 637–642, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Knudsen, J. Rosand, D. Karluk, and S. M. Greenberg, “Clinical diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: validation of the boston criteria,” Neurology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 537–539, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, W. Xing, Y. Wang et al., “Upregulation of caveolin-1 contributes to aggravated high-salt diet-induced endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in type 1 diabetic rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 113, no. 1-2, pp. 31–39, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, R.-V. Stan et al., “Defects in caveolin-1 cause dilated cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension in knockout mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 17, pp. 11375–11380, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. K. van Helmond, J. S. Miners, E. Bednall et al., “Caveolin-1 and -2 and their relationship to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 317–327, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Charidimou, A. Krishnan, D. J. Werring, and H. Rolf Jäger, “Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and clinical relevance in different disease settings,” Neuroradiology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 655–674, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Moran, T. G. Phan, and V. K. Srikanth, “Cerebral small vessel disease: a review of clinical, radiological, and histopathological phenotypes,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Engel, L. Beckers, E. Wijnands et al., “Caveolin-1 deficiency decreases atherosclerosis by hampering leukocyte influx into the arterial wall and generating a regulatory T-cell response,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3838–3848, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pavlides, J. L. Gutierrez-Pajares, J. Iturrieta, M. P. Lisanti, and P. G. Frank, “Endothelial caveolin-1 plays a major role in the development of atherosclerosis,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 356, no. 1, pp. 147–157, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Jun Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1116

Downloads

1020

Citations