Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2016 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9651236 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9651236

Gisele Pereira Dias, Graham Cocks, Mário Cesar do Nascimento Bevilaqua, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Sandrine Thuret, "Resveratrol: A Potential Hippocampal Plasticity Enhancer", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 9651236, 14 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9651236

Resveratrol: A Potential Hippocampal Plasticity Enhancer

Academic Editor: Francisco J. Romero
Received23 Jan 2016
Revised31 Mar 2016
Accepted24 Apr 2016
Published25 May 2016


The search for molecules capable of restoring altered hippocampal plasticity in psychiatric and neurological conditions is one of the most important tasks of modern neuroscience. It is well established that neural plasticity, such as the ability of the postnatal hippocampus to continuously generate newly functional neurons throughout life, a process called adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN), can be modulated not only by pharmacological agents, physical exercise, and environmental enrichment, but also by “nutraceutical” agents. In this review we focus on resveratrol, a phenol and phytoalexin found in the skin of grapes and red berries, as well as in nuts. Resveratrol has been reported to have antioxidant and antitumor properties, but its effects as a neural plasticity inducer are still debated. The current review examines recent evidence implicating resveratrol in regulating hippocampal neural plasticity and in mitigating the effects of various disorders and diseases on this important brain structure. Overall, findings show that resveratrol can improve cognition and mood and enhance hippocampal plasticity and AHN; however, some studies report opposite effects, with resveratrol inhibiting aspects of AHN. Therefore, further investigation is needed to resolve these controversies before resveratrol can be established as a safe coadjuvant in preventing and treating neuropsychiatric conditions.

1. Introduction

Neural plasticity refers to the ability of the nervous system to adaptively respond to changes in the environment sensed by the organism and extends to stimuli such as an enriched environment (EE), increased physical activity, and changes in pharmaceutical and nutritional intake (reviewed in [14]). Among the most remarkable forms of neural plasticity is the capacity of the adult hippocampus to continuously generate functional neurons throughout life, a process known as adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN). Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus is only possible due to the presence of a pool of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) under constant self-renewal in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus (reviewed in [5]). AHN is a highly regulated process, encompassing stages of cell proliferation, neuronal differentiation, maturation, survival, and functional integration into preexisting circuits (Figure 1). In each of these stages, cells express specific markers, allowing researchers to characterize AHN-related endophenotypes of a certain pathological condition or to identify the specific stages where a proposed intervention exerts its effects.

The search for molecules and lifestyle changes that are able to restore AHN in incapacitating and highly prevalent conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [6], depression [79], anxiety [10], stroke [11], diabetes [12], and chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (reviewed in [13]), is one of the most challenging and relevant goals of modern neuroscience. Here we examine the role of nutrition as a potential enhancer of AHN. In this respect, a number of studies have shown that total calorie intake, as well as meal frequency, texture, and content are able to modulate AHN (reviewed in [14]). Particularly in the context of food content, a growing literature point to polyphenols—compounds widely found in certain fruits, spices, and tea leaves—as capable of inducing important antioxidant responses in the brain [15], as well as protecting or enhancing AHN levels [1618] (reviewed in [19]).

Within the context of polyphenols, we focus here on resveratrol (3,5,4′-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene; RSV), a phenol and phytoalexin found in the skin of grapes and red berries, as well as in several types of nut. RSV is thought to exert part of its actions through the activation of the histone deacetylase enzyme sirtuin 1 (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog; SIRT1) [2022]. In addition, its neuroprotective effects appear to be mediated by an increase in the activation of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK), leading to neurite outgrowth and stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis [23]. RSV’s antioxidant [24] (reviewed in [25]), anti-inflammatory [26], and antitumor [2729] activities are well documented. RSV is also known for its ability to promote increased lifespan [30, 31], resembling the effects exerted by caloric restriction (CR). However, with regard to AHN enhancement, studies show opposing and contradictory results, and therefore it is still intensely debated whether RSV can be considered a proplasticity inducer in the context of AHN. This systematic review aims to describe and discuss the most recent findings on the effects of RSV on AHN, so that a clearer picture of the circumstances in which this polyphenol may exert either pro- or antiplasticity effects at the level of AHN can be delineated.

2. Methods

A bibliographical search was carried out in the databases Medline/PubMed and Web of Science/ISI in order to collect studies about RSV, hippocampal neurogenesis, and hippocampal plasticity. The keywords used were “resveratrol AND hippocampal neurogenesis” and “resveratrol AND hippocampal plasticity”. The search results are displayed in Table 1. Only original papers published in English from 2000 to 2015 and directly assessing hippocampal neurogenesis or other hippocampal plasticity markers accompanied by treatment with RSV were selected. Eleven articles following these criteria were identified, both in vivo and in vitro, to compose Table 2. Seven papers that did not appear in the original search-engine results were further identified manually to comply with the inclusion criteria and were added to the selected literature.

DatabasesResveratrol AND hippocampal neurogenesisResveratrol AND hippocampal plasticity

Web of Science129

ModelCondition studiedRSV treatmentEffects of RSV on behaviorCellular and molecular effects of RSV in the hippocampusConclusion/proposed mechanismReference

Male Wistar rats (180–200 g)Depression (UCMS)20, 40, and 80 mg/kg (daily i.p. injections, for 5 weeks)↑ sucrose consumption (all doses); ↓ immobility time in the FST (40 and 80 mg/kg); ↑ locomotor activity and grooming in the OFT (80 mg/kg)↑ BDNF (80 mg/kg), pERK (80 mg/kg), and pCREB (40 and 80 mg/kg) levels to control levelsAntidepressant effects of RSV likely to be mediated by its ability to regulate HPA axis function and ↑ BDNF, pERK, and pCREB levels in the hippocampus and amygdala[38]

Male Wistar rats (180–200 g)Depression (UCMS)80 mg/kg (daily i.p. injections, for 5 weeks)RSV prevented stress-induced impairment of spatial working memory in the MWM and recognition memory performance in the NORT↑ BDNF, pERK, and pCREB levels to control levelsRSV can prevent UCMS-induced cognitive impairment likely via modulating HPA axis function and ↑ BDNF, pERK, and pCREB levels in the hippocampus and PFC[40]

Male Wistar rats (250–300 g)Depression (UCMS)5 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg (daily i.p. injections, for 35 days)RSV did not prevent the UCMS-induced decrease in locomotor activity; RSV (20 mg/kg) prevented memory impairment in the PAT and MWM↑ BDNF and c-Fos levels in CA1 and CA3 to nonstressed control levelsRSV can prevent UCMS-induced cognitive impairment likely via ↑ expression of BDNF and c-Fos in the hippocampus and regulating plasma levels of TNF-α and IL-β[41]

4–6-week-old male Swiss albino miceDepression (s.c. injection of CORT [40 mg/kg] for 21 days)80 mg/kg (oral), 30 min prior to CORT injection, for 21 days↑ sucrose consumption; ↓ immobility time in the FST and TST↑ BDNF levelsRSV exerts antidepressant effects, likely through restoration of the HPA axis and upregulation of hippocampal BDNF[47]

Offspring (PND 40) of 3-4-month-old Wistar ratsPrenatal stress (restraint stress during early or late gestational period)10 mg/kg (oral) throughout pregnancyN/A↑ number of DCX+ neurons and ↑ expression of BDNFEffects of RSV likely to occur via SIRT-1-induced activation of AMPK, which stimulates neuronal differentiation and mitochondrial biogenesis. This, in turn, could lead to ↑ BDNF activation via ↑ production of ATP[49]

14-15-week-old Wistar-Kyoto ratsNoninduced model of depression10 or 40 mg/kg (acute or chronic—daily i.p. injections, for 7 days)↓ immobility time in the FST (acute, 40 mg/kg, and chronic, 10 and 40 mg/kg); no effects in the OFT; ↑ sucrose intake (chronic, 10 and 40 mg/kg) ↑ BDNF expression (chronic, 10 and 40 mg/kg)Effects of RSV likely to occur via activation of BDNF[50]

In vivo: PND6-PND14 C57/BL6 mice  
In vitro: C17.2 cells
EtOH exposureIn vivo: 20 mg/kg i.p. injection at PND6 (followed by two 2.5 g/kg i.p. injections of 20% EtOH at PND7) 
In vitro: 5 µM (for 12 h); EtOH (700 mg/dL) added after 12 h RSV treatment (and kept for 12 h or 36 h)
N/AIn vivo: RSV rescued ↓ in the number of (DG): granule cells; BrdU+, Sox2+, Sox2 & GFAP+, BLBP & nestin+, BrdU & DCX+, BLBP & GFAP+ cells; spine density; mushroom spine proportion; (hippocampus) pERK/ERK ratio; Hes 1 and Sirt1 protein levels 
In vitro: ↑ ratio of Ki-67+ cells; reversed cell apoptosis and cell arrest of NPCs
EtOH-mediated ↓ in postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis likely involves expression of pERK and Hes 1 in the neonatal hippocampus; activation of SIRT1 by RSV can protect neonatal neurogenesis from EtOH-induced detrimental effects[53]

8-week-old female BALB/c miceCFS40 mg/kg (oral), daily for 4 weeks ↑ daily activityRSV rescued ↓ in the number of BrdU+ cells; ↓ apoptosis in the DG; ↑ BDNF mRNA expression; ↓ levels of acetylated p53RSV can potentially improve fatigue symptoms and enlarge the CFS-related atrophic hippocampus likely through ↓ apoptosis and ↑ cell proliferation in the DG[60]

Male Wistar rats (325–375 g)GCI1 or 10 mg/kg daily i.p. injections for 21 days prior to surgeryBoth doses of RSV ↑ swimming time in the target quadrant during the probe trial of the MWM 7-8 weeks following GCIBoth doses of RSV led to ↑ CA1 neuronal density (7 and 85 days after GCI); ↓ DCX/PSA-NCAM colabeled cells in the DG (both doses and at both intervals); ↑ expression of CD31 in CA1 (1 mg/kg at 7 days); ↑ expression of CD31 in CA1 (1 and 10 mg/kg at 85 days); ↑ expression of CD31 in CA3 (1 and 10 mg/kg at 7 days); ↓ expression of CD31 in the GD (1 mg/kg at 7 days); ↑ expression of CD31 in the DG (1 and 10 mg/kg at 85 days)Chronic RSV administration is associated with neuroprotection against GCI likely through restoration of AHN levels and increased angiogenesis [65]

Male SD rats (250–280 g)Poststroke depression10, 20, or 40 mg/kg (gavage), once daily 7 days prior to MCAO and 1 day or 13 days after insult RSV (20 and 40 mg/kg) ↑ sucrose preference 13 days after MCAO and ↓ immobility time in the FSTRSV (20 and 40 mg/kg) ↓ CRF protein expression, restored expression of GR, and ↑ BDNF protein expressionRSV exerts neuroprotective effects against stroke and poststroke depression in part mediated by HPA axis regulation[69]

8–10-week-old male SD rats Diabetes (streptozotocin-induced)0.75 mg/kg (oral), 3x/day (8 h interval) for 4 weeksN/A↓ number of degenerative neurons in CA3; ↓ astrocytic activation in CA1 and CA3; ↓ hippocampal expression of TNF-α, IL-6, pERK1/2, and phospho-p38; ↓ BBB permeability and VEGF, both in the hippocampus; ↑ mitochondrial genesis in CA3 neurons; ↑ hippocampal pAMPKRSV could be effective for treating diabetes due to its anti-inflammatory/antineurodegeneration effects in the hippocampus [75]

7-week-old C57BL/6 miceDiabetes (streptozotocin-induced)50 mg/kg mixed with AIN93G diet per day for 6 weeksN/A↑ expression of Hdac4 and Jak1 genes; ↓ expression of ApoE and Hat1 genes, in comparison with non-RSV diabetic miceRSV could be effective for cognitive function in diabetes due to its effects in normalizing the expression of AHN and synaptic plasticity genes in the hippocampus[76]

Male Wistar rats (250–300 g)Diabetes (streptozotocin-induced)20 mg/kg (gavage) for 3 weeksN/ARSV could not restore the lower levels of hippocampal cell proliferation (number of BrdU+ cells)RSV was effective in promoting antioxidant effects in diabetic rats but failed to enhance AHN[77]

In vitro: (E7) rat hippocampal H19-7 neuronal cell lineAD75 µM for 2 h before 25 µM of Aβ for 24 hN/ARSV ↑ expression of PSD-95, Arc, and synaptophysinRSV’s neuroprotective effects over memory loss in vitro might occur through improvement of expression of memory-associated proteins[82]

21-month-old male Fischer 344 ratsAging40 mg/kg (daily i.p. injections) for 4 weeks (analysis at 25 months of age)↑ learning and memory in the MWM; ↓ immobility time in the FST ↑ AHN (↑ number of BrdU+ cells; net BrdU+/NeuN+; ↑ number of DCX+ cells); ↑ RECA-1 in CA1 and entire hippocampus; ↓ hypertrophy of astrocytes; ↓ microglia activationRSV administered in late middle age might ↑ memory and mood likely through modulation of synaptic plasticity and suppression of inflammation [83]

20–22 g ICR mice1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg + piperine (2.5 mg/kg)↓ immobility time in the FST and TST (10 and 20 mg/kg RSV + 2.5 mg/kg piperine)↓ MAO-A activity; ↑ 5-HT and NEAntidepressant effects of RSV combined with piperine may be due to activation of the 5-HT and NE systems in brain regions including the hippocampus[92]

4-week-old male C57BL/6 mice1 or 10 mg/kg i.p. injection/day for 14 days↑ latency to find the hidden platform of the MWM↓ number of DCX+ cells and of BrdU+/NeuN+ in the DG; ↓ BDNF and pCREB levels RSV impairs AHN, likely through suppression of CREB and BDNF[94]

In vitro: 14-day hippocampal neurospheres from adult male C57Bl/6 mice0.1, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 50 µM (assessment of number of neurospheres/hippocampus) 
0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µM (assessment of proportion of neurospheres expressing β-III tubulin)
N/A↓ number of neurospheres/hippocampus (10, 20, and 50 µM RSV); ↓ proportion of neurospheres expressing β-III tubulin (2 and 4 µM)RSV hinders differentiation of neurons from adult neural precursors, likely through activation of Sirt1 signaling[95]

AD = Alzheimer’s disease; AMPK = 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; APOE = apolipoprotein E; Arc = activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein; ATP = adenosine triphosphate; BBB = blood-brain barrier; BDNF = brain-derived neurotrophic factor; BLBP = brain lipid-binding protein; BrdU = bromodeoxyuridine; CFS = chronic fatigue syndrome; CORT = corticosterone; CRF = corticotropin-releasing factor; DCX = doublecortin; DG = dentate gyrus; E7 = embryonic day 7; EtOH = ethanol; 5-HT = 5-hydroxytryptamine; FST = forced swimming test; GCI = global cerebral ischemia; GFAP = glial fibrillary acidic protein; GR = glucocorticoid receptor; HAT1 = histone acetyltransferase 1; HDAC4 = histone deacetylase 4; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; IL-1β = interleukin-1β; IL-6 = interleukin-6; JAK1 = Janus kinase 1; MAO-A = monoamine oxidase A; MCAO = middle cerebral artery occlusion; N/A = not assessed; NE = noradrenaline; NeuN = neuronal nuclei protein; NORT = novel object recognition task; OFT = open field test; PAT = passive-avoidance test; PFC = prefrontal cortex; PND = postnatal day; PSD-95 = postsynaptic density protein 95; RECA-1 = endothelial cell antigen-1; RSV = resveratrol; S.C. = subcutaneous; SD = Sprague-Dawley; SIRT1 = nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent deacetylase sirtuin-1; TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-α; TST = tail suspension test; UCMS = unpredictable chronic mild stress; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor.

3. Results and Discussion

Results are discussed in accordance with the disorder or condition investigated: stress, ethanol-induced toxicity, chronic fatigue, stroke, diabetes, aging, AD, and the healthy brain. Main findings are shown in Table 2 and discussed in the following sections.

3.1. RSV and Stress

Stress has been widely proposed as an important risk factor for depression. A range of evidence supports this idea, with one of the most widely accepted animal models for depression being generated as a result of chronic submission to several different and unpredictable stressors (unpredictable chronic mild stress [UCMS]), proposed by Willner et al. in 1987 [32]. Rodents submitted to the UCMS paradigm display depressive-related phenotypes, such as reduced consumption of sucrose [33], increased immobility time in the forced swimming test (FST) [33, 34], impairment of coat state [35] and of hippocampal-dependent learning [36]. Intriguingly, the behavioral changes triggered by exposition to stressful events are often followed by a number of hippocampal alterations, including reduced levels of AHN [36, 37] and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [37]. As demonstrated in several studies, at certain doses, RSV can exert antidepressant effects and restore the hippocampal plasticity markers which are found to be decreased in stress-induced models of depression. For instance, intraperitoneal injections of RSV (mainly at 80 mg/kg; see Table 2 for details) had similar effects to those of antidepressant desipramine, both in normalizing behavior and serum corticosterone (CORT) levels in rats exposed to UCMS for 5 weeks [38]. The study also revealed that RSV could restore the levels of BDNF, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), a protein in the ERK pathway, involved in the differentiation, survival, and other aspects of neuronal plasticity [39], and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB), involved in enhancing the transcription of the BDNF gene [38]. Similarly, the same regimen of RSV was shown to prevent the cognitive deficits caused by the UCMS in the Morris water maze (MWM) and in the novel object recognition task, also accompanied by restoration of BDNF, pERK, and pCREB levels [40]. In another report, RSV at a dose of just 20 mg/kg was found to prevent the UCMS-induced cognitive impairments in the MWM, and also in the passive-avoidance test, a test was designed to assess emotional memory [41]. Once again, the neuroprotective effects of RSV against the deficits induced by the UCMS paradigm were proposed to be mediated by restored levels of hippocampal BDNF (as shown in CA1 (cornus ammonis 1) and CA3 regions). In addition, the reduction in c-Fos protein expression following UCMS was prevented by RSV, suggesting that the effects of this polyphenol can include changes in target gene expression. Furthermore, the study reports anti-inflammatory effects of RSV, in that it normalized the UCMS-induced higher circulating levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Considering the detrimental effects of both TNF-α [42] and IL-1β [43] (reviewed in [44]) over parameters of hippocampal neurogenesis, it is plausible to reason that, by decreasing the levels of these proinflammatory cytokines, RSV could contribute to preserving neurogenesis and, therefore, protecting cognitive function. Also in the context of inflammation, Bellaver et al. showed that RSV could prevent the decrease in antioxidant defenses and the increase in inflammatory responses (as measured by the levels of TNF-α and IL-1β) in hippocampal astrocyte cultures of adult and aged Wistar rats [45]. Although the study did not investigate parameters of hippocampal neurogenesis, it is well known that astrocytes play an important role in the regulation of a number of neural plasticity events, including neurogenesis [46]. Therefore, a potential protection of AHN by RSV through astrocytic regulation should not be discarded.

Besides the UCMS paradigm, another way to induce depressive-like behaviors in rodents is by repeated administration of CORT. A recent study used this model and obtained a depressive-like phenotype in mice after 21 days of CORT subcutaneous injection (40 mg/kg) [47]. Interestingly, orally administered RSV (80 mg/kg) 30 min prior to the 21 CORT injections was able to significantly ameliorate all the behavioral parameters analyzed, including RSV increased sucrose consumption and decreased immobility time both in the FST and in the tail suspension test (TST), to levels comparable with those found in CORT + fluoxetine-treated mice [47]. Moreover, hippocampal BDNF levels were found to be increased in CORT + RSV- and CORT + fluoxetine-treated animals. Although these findings are consistent and encouraging, other hippocampal plasticity markers (such as those related to AHN) have not been investigated, indicating the need for further studies.

In the context of stress, a study investigated the potential neuroprotective effects of RSV (10 mg/kg body weight) orally administered throughout pregnancy in the offspring of female rats subjected to restraint stress (3 times a day, for 45 minutes) in either the early (gestation day 1 to 10) or late (gestation day 11 till delivery) gestational periods [48]. The study demonstrated that prenatal administration of RSV was neuroprotective for the offspring at postnatal day 40 (PND40) from the deleterious effects of prenatal stress on anxiety (as measured in the open field test) and on cognitive function (as assessed in the MWM). The study, however, did not investigate hippocampal plasticity parameters. Considering the involvement of the hippocampus in both anxiety and cognitive regulation, it is clearly of interest to further investigate hippocampal-related plasticity markers in a similar experimental design, and a subsequent study by Madhyastha et al. [49] attempted to address this issue. Using the same prenatal stress and RSV regimen, the authors found that this polyphenol was able to improve the number of DCX+ (doublecortin) neurons in the DG, as well as hippocampal BDNF expression, of PND40 pups whose dams have been exposed to prenatal stress.

Interestingly, it is not only in stress-induced models of dysfunctional phenotypes that RSV has been shown to exert positive effects. In Wistar-Kyoto rats, an inbred strain of rodents that displays depressive-like behavior even in the absence of aversive stimuli, RSV intraperitoneally administered acutely (40 mg/kg) and for 7 days (10 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg) could reduce immobility time in the FST [50]. The chronic regimen, at both doses, could also increase sucrose intake. Interestingly, at one-week posttreatment, behavioral effects could be no longer observed, suggesting that sustained consumption of RSV might be necessary for antidepressant effects. With regard to plasticity markers, following 7 days of RSV treatment (10 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg), BDNF has been found to be increased in the hippocampus, an effect not observed in other brain areas involved in the neurobiology of depression, such as the frontal cortex.

3.2. RSV and Ethanol-Induced Toxicity

Ethanol (EtOH) exposure in utero is well recognized as an important risk factor in abnormal brain development and function. Indeed, a number of adverse outcomes at the cognitive, physical, and behavioral levels have been described as a result of prenatal EtOH exposure, giving rise to a continuum of conditions known as Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) [51]. The detrimental effects of alcohol to the brain and hippocampal plasticity, however, are not restricted to exposure during the prenatal period. In the rat DG, for instance, EtOH administered at the end of the first postnatal week (PND7) was capable of significantly reducing the pool of neural stem cells (NSCs) and NPCs [52], a finding that may have subsequent consequences for AHN.

In order to investigate the putative role of RSV in protecting the neonatal hippocampus against the deleterious effects of EtOH, a recent report pretreated C57/BL6 mice at age PND6 with RSV (20 mg/kg), subsequently exposing them to 20% EtOH (total of 5 g/kg) at PND7 [53]. The study investigated a number of hippocampal neurogenesis markers, as well as other aspects of neural plasticity. For instance, using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling to assess cell proliferation at PND8, it was found that RSV could protect the neonatal DG, reversing the EtOH-induced reduction in cell proliferation. Neuroprotective effects of RSV were also observed with regard to attenuation of the decreased pool of hippocampal neural precursor cells, as shown by the number of Sox2+, Sox2/glial fibrillary acidic protein+ (GFAP), and brain lipid-binding protein (BLBP)/nestin+ cells in the DG. RSV was also found to reverse the antineurogenic effects of EtOH at PND14, as measured by the number of cells expressing both BrdU and DCX. In addition, pretreatment with this polyphenol could promote the reversal of the reduced spine density of granule neurons in mice also exposed to EtOH. In fact, not only the density of spines was augmented as a result of RSV treatment prior to EtOH exposure, but also the proportion of more mature, mushroom shaped spines was found to be higher in RSV-treated groups. Hippocampal levels of proteins involved in the proliferation, maintenance, and fate determination of NPCs, such as pERK [54], Hes 1 (hairy and enhancer of split-1) [55], and Sirt1 [56], were also verified to be increased in the RSV + EtOH group. Interestingly, the findings of RSV treatment in vivo on cell proliferation were also consistent with those of in vitro assays. Using C17.2 NPCs cells, the same study reported that pretreatment with RSV could attenuate the detrimental effects of EtOH on the number of Ki-67+ cells, as well as reducing apoptosis and preventing the cell cycle arrest mediated by EtOH exposure [53].

3.3. RSV and Chronic Fatigue

Another condition whose pathophysiology has been found to include hippocampal abnormalities is chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). For instance, reduced levels of N-acetylaspartate, a marker of neuronal metabolism, were found in the right hippocampus of CFS patients [57]. Other lines of evidence linking the hippocampus and CFS come from studies reporting a particular reduction in serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding potential in this brain structure in these individuals [58], as well as a significant increase in blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activity in brain regions including the hippocampus of CFS subjects during a fatiguing cognitive task [59].

In the context of RSV, Moriya et al. [60] found that daily doses of orally administered RSV (40 mg/kg) for 4 weeks could rescue the decreased daily activity of an animal model of CSF. At the hippocampal level, this behavioral effect was accompanied by an increase in cell proliferation in the DG, as measured by BrdU labeling, and a decrease in the levels of apoptosis, as measured by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay (TUNEL) in the DG, as also suggested by the reduction in the levels of acetylated p53 in the hippocampus.

3.4. RSV and Stroke

In pathological conditions such as stroke, quiescent NSCs can become active, a phenomenon that is being actively investigated in the field of neural repair and regeneration. Also, in the context of stroke, RSV has emerged as a potential plasticity inducer, with evidence pointing to an antiapoptotic action in hippocampal neurons after focal cerebral ischemia in rats [61], and by attenuation of the cerebral ischemic injury through upregulation of transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) and enzyme heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) [62], implicated in oxidative stress responses [63].

With regard to hippocampal neurogenesis, in an in vitro model of stroke using oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R), pretreatment with RSV was able to increase NSCs survival and proliferation [64]. Furthermore, RSV administered prior to the insult was associated with upregulation of protein patched homolog 1 (Patched-1), Smoothened (Smo) and Gli-1 proteins, and mRNA, indicating that RSV effects in this condition were mediated by sonic hedgehog signaling. These findings, however promising, derived from cultured cerebral cortices of rats and could not be directly extrapolated to the context of AHN. Another recent study, nevertheless, analyzed the rat hippocampus following global cerebral ischemia and previous treatment with RSV [65]. The authors found that RSV (at 1 and 10 mg/kg) could protect CA1 neurons from the ischemic insult at both 7 and 85 days after surgery. Protein platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) (CD31), a selective marker of angiogenesis, has also been found at higher density in hippocampal area CA1 (1 mg/kg, 7 days after ischemia; 1 and 10 mg/kg, at both 7 and 85 days after ischemia), CA3 (1 and 10 mg/kg, 7 days after ischemia), and DG (1 and 10 mg/kg, 85 days after ischemia). This latter finding deserves special attention, considering the association between local angiogenesis and normal levels of AHN [66]. Specifically, with regard to AHN, Girbovan et al. [65] found that RSV treatment prior to the global cerebral ischemia was associated with reduced number of DCX-PSA-NCAM colabeling cells at both doses and intervals studied. According to the authors, one possible explanation for this intriguing finding is that RSV can decrease microglia and astrocyte activation 7 days after the ischemic insult [67], which can therefore inhibit glial released trophic factor-induced neurogenesis [68]. However, despite the reduced AHN found, increased swimming time in the target quadrant during the probe trial of the MWM was found in RSV-treated ischemic rats. Further studies are therefore warranted so that a better understanding of the effects of RSV as an inducer or inhibitor of plasticity at the AHN level in the context of stroke can be achieved.

Some of the most interesting findings relating RSV to hippocampal plasticity within the context of ischemia come from measures of poststroke depression. A recent study showed that oral administration of RSV (20 and 40 mg/kg) was able to significantly reduce the infarction volume of the brain 22 h following middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and exerted antidepressant effects 13 days after insult [69]. These antidepressant effects included increased sucrose preference and decreased immobility time in the FST to levels comparable to those elicited by antidepressant imipramine. At the hippocampal level, the authors found that the aforementioned doses of RSV were able to decrease the levels of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) as well as to increase the expression of glucocorticoid receptors (GR), both measures indicating normalized activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Moreover, hippocampal levels of BDNF protein were found to be increased in MCAO rats treated with RSV. It would have been interesting if the study had also included the analysis of neurogenic markers; considering that AHN can be reduced when the HPA axis is activated [70] and, conversely, it is normally found to be increased upon higher levels of hippocampal BDNF (reviewed in [71]), it is plausible to hypothesize that RSV could augment AHN in MCAO rats. Empirical evidence to assert this hypothesis is, nevertheless, needed.

3.5. RSV and Diabetes

Due to its association with cognitive deficits (reviewed in [72]), the link between diabetes and hippocampal changes has been receiving growing attention in the past few years. In clinical studies, it has been shown that patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D) exhibit cognitive deficits which are associated with changes in left hippocampal metabolism [73]. Animal models of diabetes also display a number of hippocampal changes such as synaptic integrity loss, as measured by a decrease in the levels of postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD-95) and synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP 25) in the hippocampus of T2D mice [74].

With regard to RSV, this polyphenol has been found to attenuate a number of diabetes-induced neurodegenerative markers. For instance, Jing et al. used the streptozotocin-induced diabetes model and found that the number of degenerative neurons in CA3 was increased, as well as astrocytic activation in CA1 and CA3 and hippocampal expression of TNF-α, IL-6, pERK1/2, and phospho-p38, among others [75]. All these parameters were significantly restored following oral administration of RSV (0.75 mg/kg) 3 times per day for 4 weeks. Although the study did not investigate AHN markers, it is plausible to reason that neurogenesis is likely to be disrupted in the model, especially considering the increased levels of hippocampal proinflammatory markers found. Supporting evidence came from a study by Thomas et al. [76] where 6 weeks of RSV supplementation (50 mg/kg) in mice resulted in normalization of expression of genes implicated with hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity (such as Hdac4, Hat1, Wnt7a, and ApoE), which had been previously found to be altered as a consequence of the diabetic state. Whether a similar RSV regimen could indeed ameliorate the possible diabetes-mediated disruption in AHN is a question yet to be answered, especially considering that other supplementation regimens in rats (20 mg/kg for 21 days) were not able to restore the lower cell proliferation levels found in the hippocampus of diabetic rats [77]. Also reinforcing the idea that RSV can potentially protect cognitive function in the context of impaired glucose metabolism, Palomera-Avalos et al. used the Senescence-accelerated prone mouse model (SAMP8, a model of glucose hypometabolism characteristic of aging and AD) and showed that RSV added to a high-fat diet (HF) for 15 weeks could prevent the behavioral deficits observed in SAMP8 mice subjected to HF [78]. In particular, it was shown that RSV could prevent the deleterious effects of HF-induced metabolic stress on the novel object recognition test (NORT) and the probe trial of the MWM. The study also showed that RSV could restore mitochondrial function and reduce oxidative stress and parameters of AD, such as Tau hyperphosphorylation. Moreover, the authors showed that in HF-fed SAMP8 mice RSV promoted action of the Wnt pathway, which is known to be important for AHN [79]. Further studies on the effects of RSV in the context of aging and AD will be discussed next.

3.6. RSV, Aging, and AD

AD is one of the most incapacitating of neuropsychiatric conditions, posing important emotional, social, and financial burdens on patients, carers, and society in general. The demographic shift to a higher proportion of older people, particularly in the developed world, places a special urgency on unravelling etiological aspects of the disease and effective ways to intervene and interrupt its progression. Although the search for effective pharmaceuticals is the basis of this endeavor, nutritional supplementation also arises as a potential coadjuvant for both prevention and treatment of AD (reviewed in [80, 81]).

In order to investigate the potential neuroprotective effects of RSV in the context of AD, a recent in vitro study pretreated rat hippocampal neuronal cells with RSV (75 μM) for 2 h followed by 24 h of incubation with Aβ (25 μM) [82]. The findings are encouraging, in that RSV was able to attenuate lipid peroxidation in Aβ-treated cells and restore a number of other oxidative damage markers, improving the levels of ascorbic acid, glutathione reductase, superoxide dismutase, among others. Of special interest here, pretreatment with RSV was also able to improve the hippocampal levels of the synaptic proteins PSD-95, synaptophysin, and activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc).

Promoting healthy aging could be one of the ways to prevent or delay the onset of AD. Within the context of healthy aging, a recent report by Kodali et al. [83] showed that a 4-week treatment with RSV (40 mg/kg) at the age of 21 months brought a series of beneficial effects at 25 months of age, both at the behavioral and hippocampal levels, in comparison with same-age vehicle-treated rats. Among the behavioral effects, RSV-treated rodents displayed decreased latency to reach the hidden platform of the MWM, as well as having improved memory in the probe trial. Antidepressant effects were also identified, as shown by the decreased floating time in the FST. These cognition- and mood-related behavioral outcomes were accompanied by improvements in hippocampal plasticity markers, such as increased number of BrdU+ and DCX+ cells in the SGZ-granule cell layer (GCL), increased net neurogenesis (defined as the number of BrdU+ cells with the percentage of newborn cells also expressing neuronal nuclei protein, NeuN), and enhanced microvasculature, as shown by rat endothelial cell antigen-1 (RECA-1) immunostaining in CA1 and entire hippocampus. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that the hippocampi of RSV-treated aged rats displayed reduced hypertrophy of astrocytes and reduced microglia activation, suggesting that this polyphenol is able to diminish the chronic low-level inflammation found in the aging rat brain. Although the focus of the study was not on dementia, considering the interplay between neuroinflammation and AD (reviewed in [84]), the findings by Kodali et al. [83] suggest that further testing of RSV in animal models of AD could be valuable.

3.7. RSV and the Healthy Brain

As discussed by Girbovan et al. [65], not many studies have investigated the effects of RSV consumptions under nonpathological conditions. This is particularly important, considering the need to better understand under which circumstances this polyphenol could exert beneficial effects to brain health and plasticity.

In this regard, Torres et al. [85] have demonstrated that dietary supplementation with RSV leads to increased cell proliferation in the DG, as determined by the number of Ki-67+ cells, as well as to an increase in the expression of presenilin 1, a regulator of AHN [86] and also involved in AD pathogenesis [87, 88] (reviewed in [89]). Also of interest to hippocampal plasticity and AHN, the authors found that dietary supplementation with RSV was associated with increased expression of the transcriptional repressor Hes 1, involved in stem cell maintenance through the Notch homolog 1 (NOTCH1) signaling pathway. At the behavioral level, an 18-month treatment with RSV (200 mg/kg/day) was capable of improving working memory in the spontaneous alternation task in nonhuman primates to levels comparable with those of CR-treated animals [90]. In addition, supplementation with RSV—but not the CR regimen—led to increased spatial memory in the circular platform task, an adaptation of the Barnes maze. Measures of hippocampal plasticity, however, were not investigated. Also at the behavioral level, RSV (10 and 20 mg/kg, orally administered in conjunction with 2.5 mg/kg piperine—an alkaloid that enhances the bioavailability of RSV in vivo [91]) exerted antidepressant effects in ICR mice, as measured by the reduced immobility time in both FST and TST [92]. Although AHN measures were not examined, the authors report serotonergic and noradrenergic changes in the hippocampus of RSV + piperine-treated mice, such as reduced activity of monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) enzyme and increases of serotonin and noradrenalin levels.

As can be noted throughout the reviewed literature, the majority of studies in healthy rodents are descriptive investigations showing possible associations between a certain RSV treatment regimen and behavioral and hippocampal changes. Not many of these associations, however, can be considered to show a causal relationship. One of the most interesting reports in the RSV literature that tried to bridge this gap is a study by Harada et al. [93]. In this study, the authors report that oral administration of RSV (20 mg/L) once daily for 3 weeks was able to induce insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) production in the hippocampus, increase AHN (as assessed by the number of BrdU+ cells and the number of BrdU+/calbindin-D28k+ cells) and angiogenesis (defined as the number of BrdU+/PECAM-1 [CD31]+ cells), and improve spatial learning and memory in the MWM. Interestingly, none of these effects were observed in calcitonin gene-related peptide- (CGRP-) knockout mice treated with the same regimen of RSV, whilst, in vitro, RSV increased CGRP release from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons from Wt mice. Considering that RSV was undetectable in the hippocampus of RSV-treated Wt mice, the report provides strong evidence that, in vivo, RSV might exert effects on the hippocampus through stimulating the release of CGRP from DRG neurons, leading to enhanced production of IGF-I by hippocampal astrocytes, thereby improving AHN and cognitive performance.

However, not all studies report proneurogenic effects of RSV. For example, Park et al. [94] report that mice administered either 1 or 10 mg/kg RSV for two weeks had reduced numbers of both NPCs and newly generated neurons in the DG of the hippocampus relative to a vehicle-treated control group, in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, they also found a reduction in BDNF and pCREB in the hippocampus and impaired spatial learning in the MWM of the RSV-treated animals relative to controls. As the authors themselves observe in their discussion, there is a marked difference in the amount of RSV administered to the animals in this study (25 or 250 microg/day/mouse) compared to some of the other apparently conflicting studies such as Harada et al. [93], where a much lower dose was administered (4 microg/day/mouse). They argue therefore that there is evidence for opposite effects on hippocampal neurogenesis depending upon the dose of RSV administered. Detrimental effects of RSV to hippocampal neurogenesis also came from in vitro studies showing that RSV treatment (10, 20, and 50 μM) significantly reduced the number of neurospheres derived from hippocampal precursors [95]. Furthermore, the same study showed that RSV (2 and 4 μM) decreased the proportion of neurospheres expressing β-III tubulin, a marker of differentiated neurons.

4. Limitations and Perspectives

Despite the weight of evidence mostly pointing to RSV as an enhancer of hippocampal plasticity, some limitations in the recent literature can be observed. For instance, the lack of behavioral and cellular data from healthy control subjects limits our understanding of the effects of RSV in physiological conditions. In Liu et al.’s work [38], the effects of RSV in the hippocampal markers (BDNF, pERK, and pCREB) in control animals (not UCMS) are not shown. This makes it difficult to evaluate whether RSV has positive effects on the hippocampus of healthy individuals. In Xu et al.’s work [53], however, the hippocampal levels of pERK in vehicle-treated mice are augmented as a result of RSV treatment, even in the absence of the EtOH insult. In addition, especially considering that most of the opposite effects of RSV as a neural plasticity enhancer come from in vivo and in vitro studies that do not mimic any particular neuropsychiatric condition (such as depression, anxiety, AD, or stroke), further replication and novel investigations of the effects of this polyphenol on AHN and other aspects of hippocampal plasticity in the healthy brain are imperative.

Some discrepancies are also found in the context of diabetes. In this respect, some encouraging findings by Jing et al. [75] and Thomas et al. [76] point to a potential role of RSV for enhancing AHN in diabetic rodents. These findings, however, are not in full alignment with those by Venturini et al. [77], where RSV supplementation was not able to elicit changes to the lower levels of cell proliferation in the hippocampus of diabetic rats. This incongruence could be due to a number of factors, including the rodent strain (Sprague-Dawley rats versus C57BL/6 mice versus Wistar rats) and the regimen (0.75 mg/kg (oral), 3x/day for 4 weeks versus 50 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks versus 20 mg/kg for 3 weeks). Furthermore, Venturini et al. [77] could not find differences in the number of proliferating cells in the DG, but other stages of AHN—such as neuronal differentiation, maturation, and survival—were not investigated. A previous study using an animal model of generalized anxiety disorder, rather than the streptozotocin-induced diabetes model, showed differences in other stages of AHN despite similar levels of cell proliferation in the DG [96]. Therefore, the potential role of RSV as an AHN enhancer in the context of diabetes could still be valid and deserves further investigation.

One of the key aspects in any attempt to determine how RSV affects hippocampal plasticity relates to the controversial roles of this polyphenol’s receptor, Sirt1. For instance, in a study by Xu et al. [53], RSV is shown to be able to antagonize the detrimental effects of EtOH on NPCs and neurogenesis, a finding accompanied by the rescue of hippocampal levels of pERK, Hes 1, and Sirt1. The authors point to the involvement of these proteins in the regulation of NPCs; however, Saharan et al. demonstrated that Sirt1 signaling negatively regulates neuronal differentiation in the adult hippocampus, with Sirt1 knockdown increasing the neurogenic potential of NPCs in vivo and in vitro [95]. In their discussion, the authors also claim that previous studies have reported that Sirt1 and Hes 1 interact and repress downstream targets [97], probably including those involved in inhibiting neuronal differentiation [95]. Similarly, Ma et al. report increased neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus with Sirt1 knockout mice [98]. However, they report that this arises primarily as a result of the loss of the repressive effects of Sirt1 on neural stem cell self-renewal, rather than on neuronal differentiation. Interestingly, Ma et al. also report that the survival of newborn neurons in the Sirt1 knockout mice is reduced, suggesting a role for this protein in neuronal viability [98]. In light of these reports additional studies with RSV are needed to further clarify the role of Sirt1 on the reported effects of RSV on hippocampal neurogenesis.

In addition, as discussed by Hurley et al. [50], most studies utilize intraperitoneal injection regimens. For translational purposes, therefore, novel assays testing effective doses of RSV administered orally, as well as investigating their correspondence to appropriate intake in humans, are needed. In this same respect, it is worth noting the need for randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of RSV supplementation with either tablets or diet on the behaviors and brain functions discussed here. Addressing this issue, a recent double-blind placebo-controlled study showed that intake of RSV capsules for 26 weeks (200 mg per day) improved memory retention (retention of words) and enhanced hippocampal functional connectivity in healthy overweight older individuals [99]. It will be interesting to see in the future if these encouraging results could also be observed in other age and body mass index populations, especially considering that another recent randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study found that, when administered in conjunction with piperine, RSV can augment cerebral blood flow in young healthy adults [100]. Nevertheless, the study failed to demonstrate that RSV could improve mood and cognition in this population. These negative results could be due to the relatively short regimen applied: only three doses of RSV (250 mg) at least a week apart. Also concerning the use of RSV by humans, a recent report showed that a single dose of this polyphenol (500 mg tablet taken orally by healthy adults) was able to promote relevant pharmacological activities, comparable to those reported by in vitro studies [101]. It was also promising that the study revealed that besides being well absorbed, RSV was also well tolerated by all participants. However, the population studied was very small ( [9 males and 6 females]); therefore future replications using larger samples would be highly desirable. Another useful line of investigation for the field of RSV and neural plasticity could be to examine if this polyphenol administered in conjunction with other beneficial strategies (such as CR, physical exercise, EE, and even other polyphenols) could exert synergistic effects capable of amplifying the potential enhancement of hippocampal plasticity observed in most of the RSV studies.

5. Conclusion

Overall, for the neuropsychiatric conditions discussed here—depression, anxiety, stroke, diabetes, EtOH administration, chronic fatigue, and AD—RSV appears to be, at least in rodents, an effective agent in promoting neuroprotection and hippocampal plasticity, including aspects of AHN. Nevertheless, the literature is not completely consistent in providing conclusive evidence pointing to RSV as a plasticity/AHN-enhancer. These opposing effects were mainly observed in assays attempting to evaluate the physiological effects of RSV (i.e., not using specific models of diseases) and deserve attention before it can be affirmed that RSV is a safe proplasticity agent. Novel studies addressing the limitations discussed in the present review are therefore needed so that a better understanding of the circumstances—dose, condition (neuropathology model versus healthy brain), form of administration, and treatment duration—in which RSV is beneficial to brain plasticity can be achieved.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work has been funded by grants provided by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq [506305/2013-9; Science without Borders Program (Special Visiting Researcher): 313740/2014-3]), and Carlos Chagas Filho Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ).


  1. H. Hirase and Y. Shinohara, “Transformation of cortical and hippocampal neural circuit by environmental enrichment,” Neuroscience, vol. 280, pp. 282–298, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Svensson, J. Lexell, and T. Deierborg, “Effects of physical exercise on neuroinflammation, neuroplasticity, neurodegeneration, and behavior,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 577–589, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Chollet, “Pharmacologic approaches to cerebral aging and neuroplasticity: insights from the stroke model,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. Murphy, G. P. Dias, and S. Thuret, “Effects of diet on brain plasticity in animal and human studies: mind the gap,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2014, Article ID 563160, 32 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Mu, S. W. Lee, and F. H. Gage, “Signaling in adult neurogenesis,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 416–423, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Sun, A. Knezovic, M. Parlak et al., “Long-term effects of intracerebroventricular streptozotocin treatment on adult neurogenesis in the rat hippocampus,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 772–784, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. S. Snyder, A. Soumier, M. Brewer, J. Pickel, and H. A. Cameron, “Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour,” Nature, vol. 476, no. 7361, pp. 458–462, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Wang, J. Warner-Schmidt, S. Varela, G. Enikolopov, P. Greengard, and M. Flajolet, “Norbin ablation results in defective adult hippocampal neurogenesis and depressive-like behavior in mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 31, pp. 9745–9750, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. S. Hill, A. Sahay, and R. Hen, “Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to reduce anxiety and depression-like behaviors,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2368–2378, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J.-M. Revest, D. Dupret, M. Koehl et al., “Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is involved in anxiety-related behaviors,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 959–967, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. V. M. Machado, M. I. Morte, B. P. Carreira et al., “Involvement of calpains in adult neurogenesis: implications for stroke,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 22, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. M. Nam, J. W. Kim, D. Y. Yoo et al., “Reduction of adult hippocampal neurogenesis is amplified by aluminum exposure in a model of type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Veterinary Science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Pereira Dias, R. Hollywood, M. C. Do Nascimento Bevilaqua et al., “Consequences of cancer treatments on adult hippocampal neurogenesis: implications for cognitive function and depressive symptoms,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 476–492, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. S. A. Zainuddin and S. Thuret, “Nutrition, adult hippocampal neurogenesis and mental health,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 89–114, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. A. Papandreou, A. Dimakopoulou, Z. I. Linardaki et al., “Effect of a polyphenol-rich wild blueberry extract on cognitive performance of mice, brain antioxidant markers and acetylcholinesterase activity,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 352–358, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. K. Tiwari, S. Agarwal, A. Tripathi, and R. K. Chaturvedi, “Bisphenol-a mediated inhibition of hippocampal neurogenesis attenuated by curcumin via canonical Wnt pathway,” Molecular Neurobiology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Y. Yoo, W. Kim, K.-Y. Yoo et al., “Grape seed extract enhances neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus in C57BL/6 mice,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 668–674, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Dong, Q. Zeng, E. S. Mitchell et al., “Curcumin enhances neurogenesis and cognition in aged rats: implications for transcriptional interactions related to growth and synaptic plasticity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e31211, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. P. Dias, N. Cavegn, A. Nix et al., “The role of dietary polyphenols on adult hippocampal neurogenesis: molecular mechanisms and behavioural effects on depression and anxiety,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2012, Article ID 541971, 18 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. D. Rowlands, C. L. Lau, J. G. Ryall et al., “Silent information regulator 1 modulator resveratrol increases brain lactate production and inhibits mitochondrial metabolism, whereas SRT1720 increases oxidative metabolism,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 1147–1156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Shakibaei, C. Buhrmann, and A. Mobasheri, “Resveratrol-mediated SIRT-1 interactions with p300 modulate receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) activation of NF-κB Signaling and inhibit osteoclastogenesis in bone-derived cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 13, pp. 11492–11505, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Shakibaei, P. Shayan, F. Busch et al., “Resveratrol mediated modulation of sirt-1/Runx2 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: potential role of Runx2 deacetylation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e35712, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Dasgupta and J. Milbrandt, “Resveratrol stimulates AMP kinase activity in neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 17, pp. 7217–7222, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Sadi and D. Konat, “Resveratrol regulates oxidative biomarkers and antioxidant enzymes in the brain of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Pharmaceutical Biology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Reinisalo, A. Kårlund, A. Koskela, K. Kaarniranta, and R. O. Karjalainen, “Polyphenol stilbenes: molecular mechanisms of defence against oxidative stress and aging-related diseases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 340520, 24 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Song, S. Y. Cheon, W. Jung, W. T. Lee, and J. E. Lee, “Resveratrol induces the expression of interleukin-10 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in BV2 microglia under hypoxia,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 15512–15529, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. G. Pizarro, E. Verdaguer, V. Ancrenaz et al., “Resveratrol inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells: role of sirtuin 1,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. T. Bai, D.-S. Dong, and L. Pei, “Synergistic antitumor activity of resveratrol and miR-200c in human lung cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2293–2297, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z. L. Chelsky, P. Yue, T. P. Kondratyuk et al., “A resveratrol analogue promotes ERKMAPK-dependent stat3 serine and tyrosine phosphorylation alterations and antitumor effects in vitro against human tumor cells,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 524–533, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. R. Valenzano, E. Terzibasi, T. Genade, A. Cattaneo, L. Domenici, and A. Cellerino, “Resveratrol prolongs lifespan and retards the onset of age-related markers in a short-lived vertebrate,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 296–300, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. X. Yu and G. Li, “Effects of resveratrol on longevity, cognitive ability and aging-related histological markers in the annual fish Nothobranchius guentheri,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 940–949, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Willner, A. Towell, D. Sampson, S. Sophokleous, and R. Muscat, “Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic unpredictable mild stress, and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 358–364, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. M. Crema, L. F. Pettenuzzo, M. Schlabitz et al., “The effect of unpredictable chronic mild stress on depressive-like behavior and on hippocampal A1 and striatal A2A adenosine receptors,” Physiology and Behavior, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Wang, W. Zhou, X. Zhou et al., “Antidepressant-like effects of alarin produced by activation of TrkB receptor signaling pathways in chronic stress mice,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 280, pp. 128–140, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Nollet, A. M. Le Guisquet, and C. Belzung, “Models of depression: unpredictable chronic mild stress in mice,” in Current Protocols in Pharmacology, chapter 5, unit 5 65, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. S. Mineur, C. Belzung, and W. E. Crusio, “Functional implications of decreases in neurogenesis following chronic mild stress in mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 251–259, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Ping, W. Qian, G. Song, and S. Zhaochun, “Valsartan reverses depressive/anxiety-like behavior and induces hippocampal neurogenesis and expression of BDNF protein in unpredictable chronic mild stress mice,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 124, pp. 5–12, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. Liu, K. Xie, X. Yang et al., “Resveratrol reverses the effects of chronic unpredictable mild stress on behavior, serum corticosterone levels and BDNF expression in rats,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 264, pp. 9–16, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Einat, P. Yuan, T. D. Gould et al., “The role of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in mood modulation,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 7311–7316, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  40. D. Liu, Q. Zhang, J. Gu et al., “Resveratrol prevents impaired cognition induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress in rats,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 49, pp. 21–29, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Yazir, T. Utkan, N. Gacar, and F. Aricioglu, “Resveratrol exerts anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects to prevent memory deficits in rats exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress,” Physiology and Behavior, vol. 138, pp. 297–304, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. A. Seguin, J. Brennan, E. Mangano, and S. Hayley, “Proinflammatory cytokines differentially influence adult hippocampal cell proliferation depending upon the route and chronicity of administration,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  43. P. A. Zunszain, C. Anacker, A. Cattaneo et al., “Interleukin-1β: a new regulator of the kynurenine pathway affecting human hippocampal neurogenesis,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 939–949, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Musaelyan, M. Egeland, C. Fernandes, C. M. Pariante, P. A. Zunszain, and S. Thuret, “Modulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis by early-life environmental challenges triggering immune activation,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2014, Article ID 194396, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. Bellaver, D. G. Souza, D. O. Souza, and A. Quincozes-Santos, “Resveratrol increases antioxidant defenses and decreases proinflammatory cytokines in hippocampal astrocyte cultures from newborn, adult and aged Wistar rats,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 479–484, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Sultan, L. Li, J. Moss et al., “Synaptic integration of adult-born hippocampal neurons is locally controlled by astrocytes,” Neuron, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 957–972, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. H. Ali, R. M. Madhana, K. V. Athira et al., “Resveratrol ameliorates depressive-like behavior in repeated corticosterone-induced depression in mice,” Steroids, vol. 101, pp. 37–42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. S. Sahu, S. Madhyastha, and G. M. Rao, “Neuroprotective effect of resveratrol against prenatal stress induced cognitive impairment and possible involvement of Na+, K+-ATPase activity,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 520–525, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Madhyastha, S. Sekhar, and G. Rao, “Resveratrol improves postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis and brain derived neurotrophic factor in prenatally stressed rats,” International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 580–585, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. L. Hurley, L. Akinfiresoye, O. Kalejaiye, and Y. Tizabi, “Antidepressant effects of resveratrol in an animal model of depression,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 268, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. E. Khoury, K. Milligan, and T. A. Girard, “Executive functioning in children and adolescents prenatally exposed to alcohol: a meta-analytic review,” Neuropsychology Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–170, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Ieraci and D. G. Herrera, “Single alcohol exposure in early life damages hippocampal stem/progenitor cells and reduces adult neurogenesis,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 597–605, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. L. Xu, Y. Yang, L. Gao et al., “Protective effects of resveratrol on the inhibition of hippocampal neurogenesis induced by ethanol during early postnatal life,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1852, no. 7, pp. 1298–1310, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Hsieh, K. Nakashima, T. Kuwabara, E. Mejia, and F. H. Gage, “Histone deacetylase inhibition-mediated neuronal differentiation of multipotent adult neural progenitor cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 47, pp. 16659–16664, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. Kageyama, H. Shimojo, and I. Imayoshi, “Dynamic expression and roles of Hes factors in neural development,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 125–133, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. Prozorovski, U. Schulze-Topphoff, R. Glumm et al., “Sirt1 contributes critically to the redox-dependent fate of neural progenitors,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. C. W. Brooks, N. Roberts, G. Whitehouse, and T. Majeed, “Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and morphometry of the hippocampus in chronic fatigue syndrome,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 73, no. 875, pp. 1206–1208, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. J. Cleare, C. Messa, E. A. Rabiner, and P. M. Grasby, “Brain 5-HT1A receptor binding in chronic fatigue syndrome measured using positron emission tomography and [11C]WAY-100635,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 239–246, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. B. Cook, P. J. O'Connor, G. Lange, and J. Steffener, “Functional neuroimaging correlates of mental fatigue induced by cognition among chronic fatigue syndrome patients and controls,” NeuroImage, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 108–122, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Moriya, R. Chen, J.-I. Yamakawa, K. Sasaki, Y. Ishigaki, and T. Takahashi, “Resveratrol improves hippocampal atrophy in chronic fatigue mice by enhancing neurogenesis and inhibiting apoptosis of granular cells,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 354–359, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Z. Li, L. Pang, F. Fang et al., “Resveratrol attenuates brain damage in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia via up-regulation of hippocampal Bcl-2,” Brain Research, vol. 1450, pp. 116–124, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Ren, C. Fan, N. Chen, J. Huang, and Q. Yang, “Resveratrol pretreatment attenuates cerebral ischemic injury by upregulating expression of transcription factor Nrf2 and HO-1 in Rats,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2352–2362, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. E. Lee, H. Yang, G. W. Son et al., “Eriodictyol protects endothelial cells against oxidative stress-induced cell death through modulating ERK/Nrf2/ARE-dependent heme oxygenase-1 expression,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 14526–14539, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. W. Cheng, P. Yu, L. Wang et al., “Sonic hedgehog signaling mediates resveratrol to increase proliferation of neural stem cells after oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation injury in vitro,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2019–2032, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. Girbovan, P. Kent, Z. Merali, and H. Plamondon, “Dose-related effects of chronic resveratrol administration on neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and corticosterone secretion are associated with improved spatial memory retention following global cerebral ischemia,” Nutritional Neuroscience, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. T. D. Palmer, A. R. Willhoite, and F. H. Gage, “Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 425, no. 4, pp. 479–494, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. C. Girbovan and H. Plamondon, “Resveratrol downregulates type-1 glutamate transporter expression and microglia activation in the hippocampus following cerebral ischemia reperfusion in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1608, pp. 203–214, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. D. Battista, C. C. Ferrari, F. H. Gage, and F. J. Pitossi, “Neurogenic niche modulation by activated microglia: transforming growth factor β increases neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. C. Pang, L. Cao, F. Wu et al., “The effect of trans-resveratrol on post-stroke depression via regulation of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 97, pp. 447–456, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. N. Lajud, A. Roque, M. Cajero, G. Gutiérrez-Ospina, and L. Torner, “Periodic maternal separation decreases hippocampal neurogenesis without affecting basal corticosterone during the stress hyporesponsive period, but alters HPA axis and coping behavior in adulthood,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 410–420, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. E. Lee and H. Son, “Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and related neurotrophic factors,” BMB Reports, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 239–244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. L. C. Geijselaers, S. J. S. Sep, C. D. A. Stehouwer, and G. J. Biessels, “Glucose regulation, cognition, and brain MRI in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review,” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–89, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. Wang, X.-Y. Xu, C.-H. Feng et al., “Patients with type 2 diabetes exhibit cognitive impairment with changes of metabolite concentration in the left hippocampus,” Metabolic Brain Disease, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1027–1034, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. C. Carvalho, M. S. Santos, C. R. Oliveira, and P. I. Moreira, “Alzheimer's disease and type 2 diabetes-related alterations in brain mitochondria, autophagy and synaptic markers,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1852, no. 8, pp. 1665–1675, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y.-H. Jing, K.-H. Chen, P.-C. Kuo, C.-C. Pao, and J.-K. Chen, “Neurodegeneration in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats is attenuated by treatment with resveratrol,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 116–127, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Thomas, M. L. Garg, and D. W. Smith, “Dietary resveratrol supplementation normalizes gene expression in the hippocampus of streptozotocin-induced diabetic C57Bl/6 mice,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 313–318, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. D. Venturini, S. Merlo, A. A. Souto, M. D. C. Fernandes, R. Gomez, and C. R. Rhoden, “Resveratrol and red wine function as antioxidants in the nervous system without cellular proliferative effects during experimental diabetes,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 434–441, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. V. Palomera-Avalos, C. Griñán-Ferré, D. Puigoriol-Ilamola et al., “Resveratrol protects SAMP8 brain under metabolic stress: focus on mitochondrial function and Wnt pathway,” Molecular Neurobiology, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. D. Mardones, G. A. Andaur, M. Varas-Godoy et al., “Frizzled-1 receptor regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis,” Molecular Brain, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 29, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. S. D. Rege, T. Geetha, G. D. Griffin, T. L. Broderick, and J. R. Babu, “Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol in Alzheimer disease pathology,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, article 218, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Maruszak, A. Pilarski, T. Murphy, N. Branch, and S. Thuret, “Hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer's disease: is there a role for dietary modulation?” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 11–38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. S. Rege, T. Geetha, T. Broderick, and J. Babu, “Resveratrol Protects β amyloid-induced oxidative damage and memory associated proteins in H19-7 hippocampal neuronal cells,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. Kodali, V. K. Parihar, B. Hattiangady, V. Mishra, B. Shuai, and A. K. Shetty, “Resveratrol prevents age-related memory and mood dysfunction with increased hippocampal neurogenesis and microvasculature, and reduced glial activation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 8075, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. F. Zhang and L. Jiang, “Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 11, pp. 243–256, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. G. Torres, J. N. Dileo, B. H. Hallas, J. M. Horowitz, and J. R. Leheste, “Silent information regulator 1 mediates hippocampal plasticity through presenilin1,” Neuroscience, vol. 179, pp. 32–40, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. J. A. Bonds, Y. Kuttner-Hirshler, N. Bartolotti et al., “Presenilin-1 dependent neurogenesis regulates hippocampal learning and memory,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0131266, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. E. M. Reiman, Y. T. Quiroz, A. S. Fleisher et al., “Brain imaging and fluid biomarker analysis in young adults at genetic risk for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in the presenilin 1 E280A kindred: a case-control study,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1048–1056, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. M. A. Fernandez, J. A. Klutkowski, T. Freret, and M. S. Wolfe, “Alzheimer presenilin-1 mutations dramatically reduce trimming of long amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by γ-secretase to increase 42-to-40-residue Aβ,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 45, pp. 31043–31052, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. S. E. Schindler and A. M. Fagan, “Autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease: a unique resource to study CSF biomarker changes in preclinical AD,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 6, article 142, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Dal-Pan, F. Pifferi, J. Marchal, J.-L. Picq, and F. Aujard, “Cognitive performances are selectively enhanced during chronic caloric restriction or resveratrol supplementation in a primate,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16581, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. J. Johnson, M. Nihal, I. A. Siddiqui et al., “Enhancing the bioavailability of resveratrol by combining it with piperine,” Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1169–1176, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. W. Huang, Z. Chen, Q. Wang et al., “Piperine potentiates the antidepressant-like effect of trans-resveratrol: involvement of monoaminergic system,” Metabolic Brain Disease, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 585–595, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. N. Harada, J. Zhao, H. Kurihara, N. Nakagata, and K. Okajima, “Resveratrol improves cognitive function in mice by increasing production of insulin-like growth factor-I in the hippocampus,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1150–1159, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. H. R. Park, K. H. Kong, B. P. Yu, M. P. Mattson, and J. Lee, “Resveratrol inhibits the proliferation of neural progenitor cells and hippocampal neurogenesis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 51, pp. 42588–42600, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. Saharan, D. J. Jhaveri, and P. F. Bartlett, “SIRT1 regulates the neurogenic potential of neural precursors in the adult subventricular zone and hippocampus,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 642–659, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. G. P. Dias, M. C. D. N. Bevilaqua, A. C. D. S. Da Luz et al., “Hippocampal biomarkers of fear memory in an animal model of generalized anxiety disorder,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 263, pp. 34–45, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. T. Takata and F. Ishikawa, “Human Sir2-related protein SIRT1 associates with the bHLH repressors HES1 and HEY2 and is involved in HES1- and HEY2-mediated transcriptional repression,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 250–257, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. C.-Y. Ma, M.-J. Yao, Q.-W. Zhai, J.-W. Jiao, X.-B. Yuan, and M.-M. Poo, “SIRT1 suppresses self-renewal of adult hippocampal neural stem cells,” Development, vol. 141, no. 24, pp. 4697–4709, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. V. Witte, L. Kerti, D. S. Margulies, and A. Flöel, “Effects of resveratrol on memory performance, hippocampal functional connectivity, and glucose metabolism in healthy older adults,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 7862–7870, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. E. L. Wightman, J. L. Reay, C. F. Haskell, G. Williamson, T. P. Dew, and D. O. Kennedy, “Effects of resveratrol alone or in combination with piperine on cerebral blood flow parameters and cognitive performance in human subjects: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over investigation,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. C. Sergides, M. Chirilă, L. Silvestro, D. Pitta, and A. Pittas, “Bioavailability and safety study of resveratrol 500 mg tablets in healthy male and female volunteers,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 164–170, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Gisele Pereira Dias et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.