Natural Products Targeting on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Safety AssessmentView this Special Issue
Potential of Lichen Compounds as Antidiabetic Agents with Antioxidative Properties: A Review
The advancement in the knowledge of potent antioxidants has uncovered the way for greater insight in the treatment of diabetic complications. Lichens are a rich resource of novel bioactive compounds and their antioxidant potential is well documented. Herein we review the antidiabetic potential of lichens which have received considerable attention, in the recent past. We have correlated the antidiabetic and the antioxidant potential of lichen compounds. The study shows a good accordance between antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of lichens and points out the need to look into gathering the scarce and scattered data on biological activities for effective utilization. The review establishes that the lichen extracts, especially of Parmotrema sp. and Ramalina sp. have shown promising potential in both antidiabetic and antioxidant assays. Ubiquitous compounds, namely, zeorin, methylorsellinate, methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate, methyl haematommate, lecanoric acid, salazinic acid, sekikaic acid, usnic acid, gyrophoric acid, and lobaric acid have shown promising potential in both antidiabetic as well as antioxidant assays highlighting their potential for effective treatment of diabetic mellitus and its associated complications. The available compilation of this data provides the future perspectives and highlight the need for further studies of this potent herbal source to harvest more beneficial therapeutic antidiabetic drugs.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an ever increasing global epidemic and one of the most challenging health problems of 21st century. In 2010, more than 285 million people around the world were afflicted with diabetes, and it was then estimated that the number of people with diabetes will increase to 439 million by 2030. Interestingly, the reports of 2015 show that globally 415 million (215.2 million men and 199.5 million women) had DM with a prevalence of 8.8%. In other words, one in eleven people have DM and global expenditure for treating it in 2015 alone was US$ 673 billion (12% of health expenditure) .
Two main groups of DM are distinguished: (1) autoimmune T1DM or insulin dependent DM or juvenile DM and (2) T2DM or noninsulin dependent DM or Maturity Onset DM. About 90% of people with DM around the world have type 2 DM (T2DM) .
In T1DM, β-cells in the pancreas are destroyed and do not secrete adequate insulin; treatment of T1DM requires insulin replacement via injection. T2DM is characterized by insulin resistance and a diminished capacity for insulin secretion by β-cells of the pancreas. T2DM is considerably more amenable to therapeutic drug intervention and is treated with insulin sensitizers, or through methods which reduce the plasma glucose levels. Natural products and herbal medicines that have claimed to be efficacious in the treatment of DM are thus most efficient in the treatment of T2DM .
Recent basic and clinical studies have exposed new understandings into the role of antioxidants to combat diabetic complications . Oxidative stress plays a significant part in the pathogenesis of diabetes and its ramifications as it leads to the dysfunction of β-cells. Antioxidants on the other hand protect β-cells from apoptosis and preserve their function . Therefore, if a compound shows good antioxidant activity, it is anticipated that it would show greater effects on diabetes and its complications as well. Thus antioxidant therapy recommends a different, innovative, and fundamental approach towards diabetes treatment [6, 7].
Lichens are composite organisms consisting of a symbiotic association between a fungal partner (mycobiont) and one or more photosynthetic partners (photobiont) usually either green algae or cyanobacterium or both. Lichens are found in all ecosystems, including the most extreme environments on earth-arctic tundra, hot deserts, icebergs, rocky coast, toxic heaps, and so on. Lichens produce characteristic and unique substances which may help them to survive in these extreme environments . Around 1050 lichen metabolites are known up to date . Importantly, the last decade witnessed renewed and growing interest in lichen substances as a source of novel, pharmacologically active biomolecules [10, 11]. Overall, tropical lichens are one of the least studied cryptogams. For example, in Sri Lanka, new species and new records of lichens are being discovered at a rapid rate and in the coming years the number of tropical lichens recorded will contribute to new knowledge of their pharmaceutical potential [12, 13]. Interestingly, wide array of biological activities have been reported revealing the pharmaceutical importance of Sri Lankan lichens [14–23].
Adequate literature exists, for certain lichens to be a viable source of antioxidants [9, 10, 24, 25]. Their antioxidant potential has been assessed in a number of assays, including, DPPH radical scavenging, reducing power, superoxide anion radical scavenging, nitric oxide radical scavenging, and lipid peroxidation inhibition. Antioxidant properties of 75 lichen species and 65 isolated metabolites were reviewed and reported . Further, over 66 lichen extracts have been reviewed and analyzed for their antioxidant potential. . However, compared to crude extracts, a limited number of publications exists for the antioxidant activity of pure compounds. The antioxidant activity of number of lichen compounds with its structure activity relationship has been reported [18, 19].
Further confounding the available information, compared to the antioxidant potential, limited information exists on evaluation of the efficacy of lichens as antidiabetic agents. A number of different approaches have been used, including α-amylase inhibitory [27–34], α-glucosidase [35, 36], and PT1B inhibitory activity [37–40], antiglycation [41, 42], along with a few in vivo studies to identify the potential of lichens in treating DM [43–45].
Importantly, most of the extracts and pure compounds of lichens reported for its antidiabetic potential have been separately studied for their antioxidant potential. Here, we summarize the antidiabetic effect of lichens by referring to recent studies, including those reported by us with the perspective of how their reported radical scavenging activities would influence the relationship (if any) between the antioxidant potential and the antidiabetic activities.
2. In Vitro Antidiabetic Activities of Lichen Extracts
Several studies have discovered the positive potential of exploring lichens as potent antidiabetic agents. Their hypoglycemic action has been assessed in different methods, including through their inhibitory activity of carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes (α-amylase and α-glucosidase) or protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), which is recognized as the major negative regulator in insulin signaling, or through antioxidative effect, involved in restoring of insulin secreting pancreatic cells .
This review summarizes the reported antidiabetic activity of lichens using α-amylase, α-glucosidase, antiglycation, and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) inhibitory assays as well of some work reported by us.
2.1. α-Amylase Activity of Lichen Extracts
α-Amylase is the key enzyme involved in carbohydrate digestion. It hydrolyzes starch and glycogen into maltose and ultimately increases the blood sugar.
Several lichen extracts have been evaluated for α-amylase inhibitory activity and have shown beneficial effects in bringing down the pace of digestion and assimilation of sugars and thereby leading to the effective management of type 2 diabetes by decreasing the postprandial hyperglycemia .
Up to now, 22 lichen extracts including some in more than one study have been assessed and shown a positive potential in the α-amylase inhibitory assay. These include Everniastrum cirrhatum, Usnea sinensis, Ramalina conduplicans, R. hossei, Parmotrema tinctorum, P. pseudotinctorum, , Flavoparmelia caperata, Physcia aipolia, Heterodermia leucomela , Ramalina sinensis, Heterodermia leucomela, Herpothallon sp., Parmotrema reticulatum , Parmotrema tinctorum , Usnea articulate, Ramalina pollinaria, Ramalina hyrcana, Cladonia rei, Flavoparmelia caperata, Parmotrema chinense, Punctelia subrudecta, Punctelia borreri, Hyperphyscia adglutinata, and Peltigera praetextata .
Wider interest has been received by plant natural polyphenols for their α-amylase inhibitory activity . Nevertheless, no reports exist for the evaluation of pure lichen compounds against the α-amylase. However, it could be resolved that the α-amylase inhibitory activity shown by above lichens could be attributed to their phenolic compounds.
The structure activity relationship of polyphenols isolated from other plant sources has shown that α-amylase inhibitory activity is influenced by a number of hydroxyl groups and their positions, methylation, methoxylation, glycosylation, and so on. Broadly, it is considered that hydroxylation of phenols increases the α-amylase inhibitory activity and methoxylation, blocks the free hydroxyl groups, and reduces the inhibitory activity .
Molecular docking studies have revealed that, overall, the inhibitory activity of phenols depends on two parameters: (i) hydrogen bonding capacity of the OH groups of the phenols with the side chains of amino acids such as Asp197, and Glu233 and (ii) planarity of aromatic rings to form an efficient conjugated π-π system with the indole Trp59 of the active site .
It is important to understand that lichen polyphenols are structurally distinct from other phenols such as flavonoids, catechins, and tannis found in higher plants. Lichen phenolics are mainly monocyclic phenols, depsides, depsidones, dibenzofurans, derived through the acetyl-polymalonly pathway, with mainly orsellinic acid as the basic unit in the biosynthesis. Thus, it would be interesting to estimate the α-amylase inhibitory activity of these different classes of polyphenols and to analyze its structure activity relationship, to describe its mechanism of action.
2.2. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of Lichen Compounds
α-Glucosidase is an another key enzyme involved in the digestion of dietary carbohydrates in humans. It hydrolyzes oligosaccharides and disaccharides into glucose, which is absorbed through the gut wall to become blood glucose. Thus, inhibition of α-glucosidase activity is viewed as one of the most effective therapeutic approaches in the reduction of glucose levels in plasma and, as a consequence, the suppression of postprandial hyperglycemia.
However, compared to α-amylase inhibitory activity, an extensive literature survey showed only four lichen, namely, Caloplaca biatorina , Ramalina celastri, R. nervulosa, and R. pacifica,  where extracts were evaluated, for their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. On the other hand, 6 common secondary metabolites have been evaluated in two different studies and have shown promising antihyperglycemic effect. These include zeorin, methyl-β-orcinolcarboxylate, methylorsellinate [16, 35], sekikaic acid, salazinic acid, and dibenzofuran usnic acid .
Monocyclic aromatics, methyl-β-orcinolcarboxylate, and methylorsellinate exhibited 4-5-fold higher activity than acarbose , whereas depsidone salazinic acid, depside sekikaic acid, and dibenzofuran usnic acid showed compatible IC50 value as compared to the standard acarbose . The kinetic inhibition studies of salazinic acid, sekikaic acid, and usnic acid towards α-glucosidase enzyme revealed the competitive type of suppression by both salazinic acid and sekikaic acid and noncompetitive inhibition by usnic acid . The kinetic studies of methyl-β-orcinolcarboxylate and methylorsellinate are not reported.
Several polyphenols isolated from different sources, especially flavonoids, have been extensively reviewed as inhibitors of α-glucosidase. Detailed SAR has revealed that both α-amylase and α-glucosidase share the same properties in terms of structural requirements for inhibition [47, 48]. However, similar to α-amylase no reports exist on SAR of lichen polyphenols against α-glucosidase. Thus, it would be vital to carry out docking based studies to understand which type(s) of hydroxyl moieties undergo H bonding with active sites amino acid residues.
Interestingly, the ubiquitous triterpenoid zeorin found exclusively in almost all lichens, possessed the most significant α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of μM, when compared to standard drugs, acarbose (IC50 = μM), and 1-deoxynojirimycin (IC50 = μM) .
The role of triterpenoids in the management of diabetic mellitus and its complications has received as much attention as plant polyphenols. Pentacyclic triterpenoids, belonging to oleanane, ursane, and lupane types, isolated from different plant sources, have been extensively reviewed as α-glucosidase inhibitors . On the other hand, zeorin is structurally different from any of the above pentacyclic triterpenoids and it would be noteworthy to study its mode of action.
2.3. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Inhibitory Assay
Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) has been recognized as a major negative regulator of insulin signaling and therefore has been identified as a possible drug target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Prior to studies by Seo et al., in 2009, no reports existed on PTP1B inhibitory activity of lichens . This group has gone on to study further, several lichen extracts as well as their isolated secondary metabolites [37–40] along with their kinetic studies, to draw considerable attention to the evaluation of different lichens against PTP1B inhibitory activity.
The Antarctic lichens which were evaluated against PTP1B inhibitory activity were Umbilicaria antarctica, Stereocaulon alpinum [37, 38], Lecidella carpathica , and Huea sp. . The compounds which resulted in the above PTP1B inhibitory activity were identified as triterpenoid, zeorin (hopane-6α,22-diol), monocyclic aromatic compounds as methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate (atraric acid), methylorsellinate, methyl haematommate, depsides lecanoric acid, gyrophoric acid, atranorin, brialmontin 1, and depsidone lobaric acid along with four new diterpene furanoids. Gyrophoric acid consisting of three orsellenic acid units had shown almost 9 times more potent PTP1B inhibitory activity as compared to lecanoric acid which consisted of two orsellenic rings. Similarly, lecanoric acid had shown almost 9 times more potent inhibitory activity than monocyclic methylorsellinate. On the other hand, Brialmontin 1, with more hydrophobicity when compared to lecanoric acid, has shown higher inhibitory potential. These results reveal that inhibitory potency appears to get stronger with increase in lipophilicity. Zeorin, the most lipophilic compound out of the tested compounds, had shown the highest potential as PTP1B inhibitor.
Further, over 27 triterpenoids of oleanane, ursane, and lupane types, isolated from different sources, have been reported as PTP1B inhibitors . However, zeorin was the most potent amongst the reported PTP1B inhibitors and inhibited PTP1B in a competitive manner. Additionally, zeorin displayed selectivity towards PTP1B over other PTPs, such as TCPTP (T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase). Structurally zeorin is different from other triterpenoids isolated from plant sources. It lacks a carboxyl group, which is considered as an essential feature, related to the inhibitory activity. Also zeorin was the only triterpenoid, amongst the PTP1B active triterpenoids, which lacked the C-3 hydroxyl group, another essential feature related to inhibitory activity. It would be interesting to see the mode of action of zeorin, which has a C-6 hydroxyl group.
2.4. Antiglycation Activity of Lichen Compounds
Increased glycation and buildup of advanced glycation end products have been implicated in diabetes complications. Thus, there is considerable interest in antiglycation compounds because of their therapeutic potential against diabetes.
Literature on crude lichen extracts for antiglycation was not found; however, antiglycation activity of several secondary metabolites has been described . Amongst the compounds examined, the depside atranorin had shown substantial activity as an antiglycation agent along with divaricatic acid and usnic acid. In an another study, ethyl haematommate, ethyl orsellinate, lecanoric acid, and gyrophoric acid had shown antiglycation activity .
Table 1 summarizes the reported antidiabetic lichens and compounds along with their tested activities.
Interestingly, ubiquitous compounds, namely, zeorin, methylorsellinate, methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate, atranorin, and lecanoric acid have shown antidiabetic activity in more than one assay including in α-glucosidase, PTP1B, and antiglycation activities, revealing the multidiabetic benefits of these lichen compounds.
2.5. In Vivo Antidiabetic Studies
The in vivo antidiabetic studies of three lichen extracts, namely, Cladonia humilis , Parmotrema grayana  and P. hababianum  have been described to prove the in vivo antidiabetic potential of lichens.
Ethanolic extracts of P. hababianum, which had shown potent in vitro antioxidant activity, had also proven to be antihyperglycemic when tested against streptozocin induced diabetic rats . Herein we report the hypoglycemic effect of authentic zeorin on streptozocin induced diabetic rats. Results revealed that zeorin at 50 mg/kg was able to bring down the blood glucose level from 500 mg/dL to 400 mg/dL within 2 hours, whereas zeorin, at 100 mg/Kg, reduced the glucose level from 580 mg/dL to 380 mg/dL. Acarbose at 5 mg/Kg reduced the serum glucose from 520 mg/dL to 380 mg/dL.
3. Antioxidant Activities of Lichen Compounds
Lichens appear to be a promising source of unique phenolic compounds, which do not occur in higher plants, and other free living fungi. The antioxidant properties of these phenolic compounds, as well as their crude extracts, have been thoroughly assessed using both in vitro and in vivo studies. Ample data exist to prove lichens as a reliable source of antioxidants. There are already several reviews on antioxidant activities of lichen extracts and their compounds [25, 26]. Reviewing the antioxidant activities of lichen compounds is beyond the scope of this study. Herein we capture the antioxidant potential of only the lichens and their compounds which have been reported as antihyperglycemic agents, to further reveal their multidiabetic potentials.
Interestingly, most of these lichen extracts and lichen compounds which are reported as antihyperglycemic (Table 1) have been separately studied and reported as antioxidants as well.
It is encouraging to note that out of the 22 lichens extracts which are reported for their antidiabetic potential, 19 have shown antioxidant activity (Table 2). The lichen extracts, namely, Flavoparmelia caperata, Parmotrema reticulatum, P. tinctorum, P. pseudotinctorum, P. chinense, Everniastrum cirrhatum, Usnea sinensis, U. articulate, Ramalina pollinaria, R. celastri, R. nervulosa, R. pacifica, R. conduplicans, R. hossei, Punctelia subrudecta, Peltigera praetextata, Umbilicaria antarctica, Stereocaulon alpinum, and Caloplaca biatorina are reported for both their antihyperglycemic and promising antioxidant activity.
Similar observations were made in the case of pure compounds. Of the 17 known secondary metabolites which have shown antidiabetic activity, namely, zeorin, methylorsellinate, methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate, methyl haematommate, orsellinic acid, lecanoric acid, atranorin, sekikaic acid, salazinic acid, gyrophoric acid, usnic acid, lobaric acid, divaricatic acid, gyrophoric acid, ethyl haematomate, ethyl orsellinate, Brialmontin 1 (Table 1), 13 are already reported for their antioxidant potentials (Table 2).
Importantly, methylorsellinate, methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate, and lecanoric acid, which had shown promising antidiabetic properties in more than one assay (Table 1), are also reported as antioxidants in diverse assays (Table 2). The other compounds such as salazinic acid, gyrophoric acid, sekikaic acid, usnic acid, methyl haematommate, orsellinic acid, lobaric acid, and divaricatic acid have also been reported for both antidiabetic and antioxidant potentials. Positive action in both assays makes these phenolic metabolites promising sources to be measured for their effects in the treatment of diabetes mellitus as well as its related ramifications.
Antioxidant activity of ethyl haematommate, ethyl orsellinate, and brialmontin 1 is not reported, whereas zeorin has not shown potent antioxidant activities in DPPH, SOI, NO, and metal chelating assays .
4. Pharmaceutical Potential of Lichen Compounds as Antidiabetic Agents
Diverse antidiabetic benefits of lichen compounds could be summarized as inhibition of starch digestion by inhibition of digestion enzymes (α-amylase, α-glucosidase), PTP1B inhibitory activity, inhibition of advanced glycation end products, and antioxidants activities, resulting in protection of β-cells from apoptosis.
Further, methylorsellinate, methyl-β-orcinol carboxylate, methyl haematommate, orsellinic acid, and lobaric acid have likewise been reported as immunomodulators in addition to antioxidants and antiglycation agents . The immunomodulatory agents are being used as adjuvant therapy in oxidative stress induced diseases to ameliorate the immune system. Thus, these compounds also show a huge potential to be pharmaceutically exploited.
Interestingly, most of the above bioactive compounds are ubiquitous compounds and it would be beneficial to develop novel techniques for direct identification of these compounds in a given extract, rather than the laborious and hectic processes of isolation, purification, and structure elucidation. A recent report on “Rapid identification of lichen compounds based on the structure–fragmentation relationship using ESI-MS/MS analysis”  may have paved the way for such analysis.
However, there is a need for more precise investigations to examine the clinical value of both isolated pure compounds and crude extracts and to elucidate their mechanisms of action. Apart from clinical validation and elucidation of their mechanism of action, biosafety studies of the compounds are also important to legitimately use the potential bioactive compounds for the further development of future lead drugs.
Lichen metabolites have demonstrated promising results as a reservoir of biological active compounds. Even though the studies on antioxidant activities of lichens have a comparatively long prior history, the reports on the potential of lichens as antidiabetic agents have evolved in the very recent past. Even from the limited data, the diverse diabetic potential is signified. Several lichens extracts have shown promising effects both in the antioxidant and in the antidiabetic assays. Interestingly and importantly, out of the 22 lichens extracts studied for their antidiabetic potential, 19 have already been established as antioxidants in separate studies. Likewise, of the 17 known secondary metabolites which have proven antidiabetic activity, 13 are recognized as antioxidants in various assays. Thus the study shows that there is a good accordance between antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of lichens.
This review points out the importance of studying lichen specific, polyphenols as α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors, to understand their mode(s) of action. Further this review highlights that even though there are substantial data on the plant derived triterpenoids such as oleanolic acid, as antidiabetic agents, lack of data on the more potent triterpenoid zeorin limits its potential application.
A detailed study of the potential protective role of these agents needs to be carried out to exploit their potential for the effective treatment of DM and associated complications.
Even from the limited number of studies it can be concluded that lichen-derived bioactive compounds hold great promise for biopharmaceutical applications as reported for antidiabetic activity and also antioxidant properties and point out the need to look into gathering the scarce and scattered data on biological activities for effective utilization.
However, unfortunately, lichens have been essentially overlooked to a great extent by the modern pharmaceutical industry, despite all the evidence of biological activity in lichen extracts provided in literature.
The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.
K. Molnár and E. Farkas, “Current results on biological activities of lichen secondary metabolites: a review,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 157–173, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
T. Mitrović, S. Stamenković, V. Cvetković, M. Nikolić, S. Tošić, and D. Stojičić, “Lichens as source of versatile bioactive compounds,” Biologica Nyssana, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
A. Orange, P. Wolseley, V. Karunaratne, and K. Bombuwela, “Two leprarioid lichens new to Sri Lanka,” Bibliotheca Lichenologica, vol. 78, pp. 327–333, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
S. Kathirgamanathar, A. Wickramasinghe, K. Bombuwela, P. Wolseley, and V. Karunaratne, “Chemistry of two new Leprarioid lichens from Sri Lanka,” Journal of National Science Foundation Sri Lanka, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
V. Karunaratne, K. Bombuwela, S. Kathirgamanathar, and V. M. Thadhani, “Lichens: a chemically important biota,” Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 169–186, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
V. M. Thadhani, Q. Naaz, M. I. Choudhary, M. A. Mesaik, and V. Karunaratne, “Enzyme inhibitory and immunomodulatory activities of the depsidone lobaric acid extracted from the lichen Heterodermia sp.,” Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 193–196, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. I. Choudhary, S. Ali, V. M. Thadhani, and V. Karunaratne, “Natural novel antioxidants,” US Patent 20,090,048,332.View at: Google Scholar
V. M. Thadhani, M. I. Choudhary, S. Khan, and V. Karunaratne, “Antimicrobial and toxicological activities of some depsides and depsidones,” Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
V. M. Thadhani, M. A. Mesaik, M. Asif, V. Karunaratne, and M. I. Choudhary, “Immunomodulatory activities of some common lichen metabolites,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 144–147, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
S. Karthik, K. C. Nandini, T. R. P. Kekuda, K. S. Vinayaka, and S. Mukunda, “Total phenol content, insecticidal and amylase inhibitory efficacy of Heterodermia leucomela (L).,” Annals of Biological Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 38–43, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
K. S. Vinayaka, S. Karthik, K. C. Nandini, and T. R. P. Kedura, “Amylase inhibitory activity of some macrolichens of western ghats, Karnataka, India,” Indian Journal of Novel Drug Delivery, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 225–228, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
R. Shivanna, P. Hengameh, and H. G. Rajkumar, “Screening of lichen extracts for in-vitro antidiabetic activity using alpha amylase inhibitory assay,” International Journal of Biological & Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 364–367, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
P. Hengameh, R. Shivanna, and H. G. Rajkumar, “In-vitro inhibitory activity of some lichen extracts against α-amylase enzyme,” European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 315–318, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
P. S. Raj, A. Prathapan, J. Sebastian et al., “Parmotrema tinctorum exhibits antioxidant, antiglycation and inhibitory activities against aldose reductase and carbohydrate digestive enzymes: an in vitro study,” Natural Product Research, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 1480–1484, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Valadbeigi and M. Shaddel, “Amylase inhibitory activity of some macro lichens in Mazandaran province, Iran,” Physiology and Pharmacololgy, vol. 20, pp. 215–219, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
V. M. Thadhani, S. N. Khan, V. Karunratne, and M. I. Choudhary, “α-Glucosidase inhibitors from lichens,” US Patent 7,867,989, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
N. Verma, B. C. Behera, and B. Om Sharma, “Glucosidase inhibitory and radical scavenging properties of lichen metabolites salazinic acid, sekikaic acid and usnic acid,” Hacettepe Journal of Biology & Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 7–21, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
C. Seo, Y.-H. Choi, J. S. Ahn, J. H. Yim, H. K. Lee, and H. Oh, “PTP1B inhibitory effects of tridepside and related metabolites isolated from the Antarctic lichen Umbilicaria antarctica,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1133–1137, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Seo, J. H. Sohn, J. S. Ahn, J. H. Yim, H. K. Lee, and H. Oh, “Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibitory effects of depsidone and pseudodepsidone metabolites from the Antarctic lichen Stereocaulon alpinum,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2801–2803, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. M. Thadhani, Semisynthesis and Bioactivities of Lichen Metabolites, Scholars' Press, 2013.
Y. Zhang, J. Shi, Y. Zhao, H. Cui, C. Cao, and S. Liu, “An investigation of the anti-diabetic effects of an extract from Cladonia humilis,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 509–512, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
C. M. Rathnayake, A. P. Malalasekera, R. P. Perera, and W. D. Ratnasooriya, “Hypoglycemic activity of methanol and methylene chorlide extracts of the lichen Parmotrema grayana,” Inventi Impact: Ethnopharmacology, vol. 2, p. 128, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
A. Ganesan, A. Mahesh, J. P. Sundararaj, K. Mani, and P. Ponnusamy, “Antihyperglycemic and anti-oxidant activity of various fraction of Parmotrema hababianum in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat,” Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 935–939, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Gonzales, G. Smagghe, C. Grootaert, M. Zotti, K. Raes, and J. V. Camp, “Flavonoid interactions during digestion, absorption, distribution and metabolism: a sequential structure–activity/property relationship-based approach in the study of bioavailability and bioactivity,” Drug Metabolism Reviews, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 175–190, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Xiao and P. Högger, “Dietary polyphenols and type 2 diabetes: current insights and future perspectives,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–38, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
M. N. Vivek, Y. Kambar, M. Manasa, T. R. P. Kekuda, and K. S. Vinayaka, “Radical scavenging and antibacterial activity of three Parmotrema species from Western Ghats of Karnataka, India,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 86–91, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. P. Kumar, T. R. P. Kekuda, K. S. Vinayaka, S. J. Sudharshan, N. Mallikarjun, and D. Swathi, “Studies on antibacterial, anthelmintic and antioxidant activities of a macrolichen Parmotrema pseudotinctorum (des. Abb.) Hale (Parmeliaceae) from Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, Karnataka,” International Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1207–1214, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
T. R. P. Kekuda, K. S. Vinayaka, D. Swathi, Y. Suchitha, T. M. Venugopal, and N. Mallikarjun, “Mineral composition, total phenol content and antioxidant activity of a macrolichen Everniastrum cirrhatum (Fr.) Hale (Parmeliaceae),” E-Journal of Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1886–1894, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kumar, B. Naik, V. Kumar, S. Kumar, D. Singh, and M. Aslam, “Evaluation of antibacterial and anti-oxidant activity of some lichens of Uttarakhand,” American Journal of Current Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
M. Gulluce, A. Aslan, M. Sokmen et al., “Screening the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of the lichens Parmelia saxatilis, Platismatia glauca, Ramalina pollinaria, Ramalina polymorpha and Umbilicaria nylanderiana,” Phytomedicine, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 515–521, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Xia, L. Namujila, and B. H. Ying, “Chemical constituents and their antioxidant activities from thallus of Ramalina conduplicans,” Mycosystema, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 169–176, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
S. V. P. Kumar, T. R. P. Kekuda, K. S. Vinayaka, and S. J. Sudharshan, “Anthelmintic and antioxidant efficacy of two macrolichens of Ramalinaceae,” Pharmacognosy Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 238–242, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
B. Ranković, Lichen secondary metabolites, Springer, 2015.View at: Publisher Site
A. Mastan, B. Sreedevi, and J. Pramoda Kumari, “Evaluation of the in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of secondary metabolites produced from lichens,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 193–198, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
H. Luo, Y. Yamamoto, J. Kim, J. S. Jung, Y. J. Koh, and J.-S. Hur, “Lecanoric acid, a secondary lichen substance with antioxidant properties from Umbilicaria antarctica in maritime Antarctica (King George Island),” Polar Biology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1033–1040, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Selvaraj, A. Tinabaye, and R. Ananthi, “In vitro antioxidant activities of Salazinic acid and its derivative hexaacetylsalazinic acid,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 345–355, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
N. Manojlović, B. Ranković, M. Kosanić, P. Vasiljević, and T. Stanojković, “Chemical composition of three Parmelia lichens and antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of some their major metabolites,” Phytomedicine, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 1166–1172, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kosanic, B. Rankovic, T. Stanojkovic, P. Vasiljevic, and N. Manojlovic, “Biological activities and chemical composition of lichens from Serbia,” Experimental and Clinical Science Journal, vol. 13, pp. 1226–1238, 2014.View at: Google Scholar