Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2103190 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2103190

Oxidative Stress Delays Prometaphase/Metaphase of the First Cleavage in Mouse Zygotes via the MAD2L1-Mediated Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

Academic Editor: Serafina Perrone
Received19 May 2017
Revised30 Jul 2017
Accepted14 Aug 2017
Published25 Sep 2017

Abstract

In zygotes, DNA damage delays the first cleavage to enable repair. Our previous study found that 0.03 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was the minimum concentration required for induction of oxidative DNA damage in mouse zygotes and that this represented the most similar situation to the clinical phenomenon. In this study, we quantified the cleavage rates of cells in blastocysts at different developmental stages, followed by immunofluorescence to detect activation of γ-H2A histone family member X (a marker of DNA damage) in zygotes to confirm that oxidative DNA damage was induced in H2O2-treated zygotes. Monitoring H3S10P (phosphorylation of Ser10 on histone H3; a prometaphase/metaphase marker) levels at different hour postinsemination revealed that treatment of zygotes with 0.03 mM H2O2 resulted in a prometaphase/metaphase delay. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining for mitotic arrest deficient 2-like 1 and the protein kinase TTK, components of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), suggested that this delay possibly involved SAC activation. These studies of the relationships between oxidative stress and SAC can promote the success rate of in vitro fertilization.

1. Introduction

Although many infertile couples have birthed children with the help of assisted reproduction technologies, these methods continue to suffer from excessive developmental failure due to differences between in vitro culture conditions and the in vivo environment, including energy sources, growth factors, pH, and atmosphere. Suboptimal embryo-culture conditions in vitro can induce high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in embryos and alter embryo development [13]. Excessive ROS generation can affect cellular function, signal transduction, and gene expression, as well as lipid peroxidation and physical DNA damage, resulting in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA-strand breaks in embryos [1, 4, 5]. High levels of ROS represent a major contributing factor in vitro to developmental blockage in zygotes [6]. However, due to ethical limitations, research cannot be performed on human embryos; therefore, in our studies, we treat mouse zygotes with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to simulate the clinical phenomenon.

In the clinic, embryonic aneuploidy in gametes or early embryos represents the leading cause of in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure [7]. This occurs when abnormal chromosomes or their abnormal segregation events are present in early stage embryos [8], resulting in excessive developmental failure in embryos [9]. However, some embryos can appear normal by day 3, although many do not reach the blastocyst stage [10, 11]. This phenomenon might be related to ROS [12]; therefore, this study tested a hypothesis suggesting a possible relationship between ROS and aneuploidy occurrence in in vitro-cultured zygotes. The occurrence of aneuploidy is tightly connected with spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) function, which ensures correct segregation of chromosomes into daughter cells and prevents premature metaphase-anaphase transition until all chromosomes successfully attach to the bipolar spindle with proper tension [13]. The SAC can prevent aneuploidy by delaying chromosome segregation at prometaphase or metaphase in response to unattached kinetochores and DNA damage during preimplantation development [9, 1416].

Because the SAC is involved in monitoring the metaphase-anaphase transition, to determine whether the cell cycle checkpoint mediates metaphase delay in response to oxidative stress, we analyzed the cell cycle kinetics of the first cleavage event in the zygote by monitoring the number of 2-cell blastocysts with both nuclei enriched for histone H3 phosphorylated on Ser10 (H3S10P), a marker of prometaphase/metaphase [15, 17]. In mammalian cells, H3S10P initially occurs within a subset of genes in late G2-interphase cells but subsequently spreads along the chromosomes until completion at prometaphase, after which H3S10P is still evident at the metaphase plate [17, 18]. Delay of H3S10P events in whole chromatin is indicative of prometaphase/metaphase delay and SAC activation [15].

To determine whether the SAC is engaged in response to oxidative stress damage in zygotes, we examined the localization of mitotic arrest deficient 2-like 1 (MAD2L1; also known as MAD2) and the protein kinase TTK by immunofluorescence staining. The end of prometaphase in mitosis correlates with checkpoint inactivation and disappearance of MAD2L1, a key player involved in SAC function [19]. MAD2L1 is observed in a punctate pattern throughout the cytoplasm but translocates to the nucleus following DNA damage and SAC activation [15, 20]. By contrast, the TTK dual-specificity protein kinase, which has been implicated in regulation of mitotic progression, is encoded by human and mouse monopolar spindle 1 (MPS1) [9] and is essential for the SAC. TTK can directly prevent anaphase onset in the presence of misaligned chromosomes. Additionally, TTK activity at the kinetochore stimulates MAD1-dependent conformational changes in MAD2L1 from an open to a closed form [21, 22], which is crucial for inhibition of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) [6, 2326], the ubiquitin ligase that controls anaphase onset.

To characterize the effects of oxidative stress on zygotes, our previous studies used different doses of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to treat mouse zygotes at 7 h postinsemination (hpi) to simulate the clinical phenomenon of oxidative damage in zygotes. Our previous results indicated that 0.03 mM H2O2 was the minimum concentration capable of inducing higher intracellular ROS levels and triggering oxidative damage in the zygote [27, 28]. In this study, we treated zygotes with 0.03 mM H2O2 at 7 hpi (G1 phase) to induce oxidative stress in zygotes, finding that H2O2 reduced the rate of blastocyst formation at day 4 but did not reduce the rates of 2-cell formation, 4-cell formation, and 8-cell formation until day 3 as compared with that observed in untreated control zygotes, representing the most similar situation to clinically observed phenomena [29, 30]. Previous studies showed that embryo damage caused by suboptimal culture media during the early stages can reduce the percentage of surviving embryos reaching the blastocyst stage [10]. γ-H2A histone family member X (γH2AX) plays an important role in DNA damage response [31] and is often used as a marker for DNA damage [3234]. Therefore, to determine whether blastocyst reduction results from DNA damage, we identified whether DNA damage occurs in zygotes by immunocytochemical detection of γH2AX protein.

Our previous study found that zygotes treated with 0.03 mM H2O2 display a delayed G2/M phase transition during the first cleavage and that the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway was involved in this delay [28]. However, we previously failed to distinguish whether the delay occurred at G2 phase or M phase in zygotes; therefore, in this study, we performed immunofluorescent identification of H3S10P, finding that treatment of zygotes with 0.03 mM H2O2 resulted in prometaphase/metaphase delay. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining of MAD2L1 and TTK suggested that the SAC is involved in metaphase delay induced by oxidative stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Adult Kunming mice (3–6 weeks old) were obtained from the animal center of Shantou University Medical College. Treatment of all mice was in compliance with the Guide for the Care of Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication number 85–23, revised 1996) and the rules set forth by the National Animal Protection of China. All experimental protocols were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of our institution (SUMC2014-014). This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shantou University Medical College.

2.2. Reagents and Media

Rabbit antiphospho-histone H2AX (γH2AX; Ser139), rabbit antiphospho-histone H3 (Ser10), and rabbit antiMAD2L1 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Rabbit anti-TTK was obtained from Proteintech (Chicago, IL, USA). Goat antirabbit secondary antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Human tubal fluid (HTF) was obtained from Sage Science (Beverly, MA, USA). 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 2 μg/mL) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Antifade fluorescence-mounting medium was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Haimen, China).

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was dissolved in 1 L ultrapure water: 8 g NaCl, 0.2 g KCl, 1.44 g Na2HPO4, and 0.24 g KH2PO4 (pH 7.4). Pancreatin solution was diluted to 0.1% with PBS, and the pH adjusted to 3.0 with HCl prior to and storage at 4°C. Zygote culture medium was prepared by adding 0.4% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The medium for the treated group was created by adding H2O2 to a final concentration of 0.03 mM, followed by preequilibration for 1 h before use. Fixative liquid consisted of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and permeabilization buffer consisted of PBS supplemented with 0.5% Triton X-100. Sperm capacitation liquid (HTF solution supplemented with 1.5% BSA), fertilization liquid (HTF solution supplemented with 0.4% BSA), and zygote culture medium were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator and allowed to equilibrate for 4 h before use.

2.3. Collection of Sperm and Oocytes, IVF, and Culture of Zygotes

As described in our previous studies [35, 36], male Kunming mice of reproductive age were euthanized, and sperm was collected from the murine cauda epididymis and incubated in capacitation medium (HTF medium containing 1.5% BSA) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 1 h. Female mice were induced to superovulate by consecutive intraperitoneal injections of 10 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and 10 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) 48 h apart [28], followed by euthanization at 13 h to 15 h after HCG administration to obtain cumulus oocytes from the oviducts. Cumulus oocytes were collected in 37°C PBS, followed by transfer to prepared 37°C fertilization liquid (HTF medium containing 0.4% BSA) under oil and containing 10 μL capacitated sperm and incubation at 37°C for 6 h in a 5% CO2 incubator to permit fertilization. Zygotes were then washed three times and cultured in new medium (HTF medium supplemented with 0.4% BSA and 10% FBS).

2.4. Mouse Zygote Model for Oxidative Damage

According to our previous studies, 0.03 mM H2O2 is the minimum concentration capable of inducing oxidative damage in zygotes [27]. Therefore, at 7 hpi, we selected two pronuclear zygotes in G1 phase for exposure to culture medium containing 0.03 mM H2O2 for 30 min to induce oxidative damage. Zygotes in the control and treated groups were then extensively washed twice in fresh embryo-culture medium, followed by further culture in embryo-culture medium for evaluation.

2.5. Indirect Immunofluorescence Staining for γH2AX, H3S10P, MAD2L1, and TTK

Zygotes were collected at different times to detect the activation of different proteins (γH2AX was detected at 17.0-18.0 hpi, H3S10P was detected every 30 min at 18.0–24.0 hpi, and MAD2L1 and TTK were detected at 19.0–19.5 hpi and 21.5–22.5 hpi in the control and treated groups, resp.). Zona pellucida was removed from zygotes with 0.1% pancreatin. After washing for 5 min three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TPBS), the zygotes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in TPBS for 30 min, mounted on polylysine-coated slides, and washed three times again with TPBS. Zygotes were then permeabilized in TPBS supplemented with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. After washing three times as above, zygotes were blocked in blocking solution (TPBS supplemented with 10% normal goat serum and 3% BSA) for 1 h. After blocking, primary antibodies were incubated at 4°C overnight at the following dilutions: rabbit anti-γH2AX (1 : 300), rabbit anti-H3S10P (1 : 150), rabbit anti-MAD2L1 (1 : 100), and rabbit anti-TTK (1 : 100). After washing with TPBS three times, zygotes were incubated with the secondary antibody (goat antirabbit IgG-FITC; 1 : 200) at room temperature for 1 h then washed three times with TPBS. Zygotes were counterstained with DAPI at room temperature for 30 min, washed three times, mounted with antifade fluorescence-mounting medium, and coverslipped. A fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse90 Ni-E; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the signal.

3. Results

3.1. Treatment with 0.03 mM H2O2 Reduces Blastocyst Formation without Affecting Early Cell Division

To explore the impact of oxidative damage on embryo development in vitro, we monitored cleavage rates at different stages in control and 0.03 mM H2O2-treated groups. Our results showed that H2O2 treatment did not significantly reduce the rates of 2-cell formation, 4-cell formation, or 8-cell formation () but produced a significant decrease in the rates of blastocyst formation () (Figure 1), which was similar to phenomena observed in the clinic [29, 30]. Therefore, we considered that treatment with 0.03 mM H2O2 reflected clinical relevance and was suitable for inducing oxidative damage in the treated group.

3.2. H2O2 Exposure Induces Nuclear γH2AX Foci Formation in Mouse Zygotes

γH2AX is an early and sensitive marker for DNA damage. To determine whether H2O2 induces DNA damage, we monitored the presence of γH2AX staining by immunofluorescence microscopy. Punctate γH2AX staining was observed in the nuclei of H2O2-treated zygotes but not detected in control zygotes (Figure 2). These findings indicated that H2O2 treatment resulted in DNA damage.

3.3. The Presence of H3S10P during Different Phases in Mouse Zygotes

In our study, we observed no H3S10P-positive signals (green) during the S phase, and subsequent analysis indicated that H3S10P affected only a subset of genes and not the entire chromatin (blue staining with DAPI) in late G2-interphase cells. However, H3S10P prevalence extended along the chromosomes, with completion observed during prometaphase and remaining evident at the metaphase plate, but disappearing during anaphase and telophase (Figure 3). Therefore, we used H3S10P as a marker of prometaphase/metaphase during mitosis.

3.4. Percentage of H3S10P-Positive Zygotes at Different Time Postfertilization

We monitored the ratios of prometaphase/metaphase zygotes by immunofluorescence staining for H3S10P at 30 min intervals and 18 hpi to 24 hpi (Table 1). After converting the ratios into percentages, we found that the percentage of H3S10P-positive zygotes in the control group was >50% at 19.0 hpi and 19.5 hpi (52.86% and 55.56%, resp.), reaching a maximum at 19.5 hpi and decreasing to zero at 21.0 hpi (i.e., when zygotes finished the first cleavage). However, in the H2O2-treated group, the percentage of H3S10P-positive zygotes was >50% at 21.5, 22.0, and 22.5 hpi (51.4%, 66.6%, and 65.0%, resp.) and reached a maximum at 22.0 hpi, after which H3S10P levels decreased rapidly and were no longer observed. These data suggested that prometaphase/metaphase was delayed in H2O2-treated zygotes and that the duration of prometaphase/metaphase in treated zygotes was prolonged relative to that observed in the control group based on the broader peak width observed in the H2O2-treated group (Figure 4).


Groups18.0 (hpi)18.5 (hpi)19.0 (hpi)19.5 (hpi)20.0 (hpi)20.5 (hpi)21.0 (hpi)21.5 (hpi)22.0 (hpi)22.5 (hpi)23.0 (hpi)23.5 (hpi)24.0 (hpi)

Control0/6710/5637/7040/7221/7512/700/63000000
Treated0/520/537/5220/860/4910/7012/6036/7046/6939/6016/644/580

The treated group was administered 0.03 mM H2O2. Hpi: hours postinsemination.
3.5. MAD2L1 and TTK Expression in the H2O2-Treated and Control Groups

Based on H3S10P prevalence, we chose to examine the expression of MAD2L1 and TTK from 19.0 hpi to 19.5 hpi for the control group and from 21.5 hpi to 22.5 hpi for the treated group. In control zygotes, MAD2L1 expression displayed a punctate pattern throughout the cytoplasm but was enriched in the nucleus in H2O2-treated zygotes (Figure 5, green). TTK expression was similarly analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence (Figure 6, green), showing positive staining in the H2O2-treated group in association with the chromatin and no staining detected in the control group. These results suggested that SAC was activated upon oxidative damage.

4. Discussion

Cultured embryos are usually subjected to oxidative stress in vitro due to suboptimal culture conditions, and H2O2 is commonly used in studies investigating the effects of oxidative stress [2, 27, 37]. When DNA damage results from oxidative stress, two pathways are activated in zygotes: the DDR pathway, which monitors DNA integrity, and the SAC, which responds to defects in spindle attachment/tension in metaphase during mitosis and meiosis [15]. We previously showed that oxidative damage activates the DDR pathway to mediate G2/M cell cycle arrest to allow repair of H2O2-induced oxidative damage [28]. By contrast, in cycling cells, the SAC is critical for preventing genome instability and producing healthy daughter cells containing the same genetic information as the mother cell during mitosis. In this study, we explored the timing of metaphase during the first round of mitosis in control and H2O2-treated zygotes and investigated the involvement of the SAC in metaphase delay.

γH2AX is an early indicator of DNA damage [31], and we previously suggested that γH2AX plays an important role in both DDR [28] and SAC by contributing to the recruitment of both TTK and MAD2L1 to the kinetochore during metaphase [38]. Our results in this study (Figure 2) showed that oxidative stress-induced DNA damage existed in H2O2-treated zygotes, but not in control zygotes. Additionally, we revealed that H2O2 treatment of zygotes did not reduce the rates of 2-cell formation, 4-cell formation, or 8-cell formation but did reduce the rates of blastocyst formation at day 4. This indicated that a moderate concentration of H2O2 (0.03 mM) produced a similar outcome as that observed clinically and in previous studies [27, 29, 30]. Therefore, this H2O2 concentration was used to treat embryos in our study.

H3S10P is a marker for prometaphase/metaphase [39] and can be used to identify metaphase delay upon DNA damage in zygotes [15]. Here, we showed that the peak percentage of H3S10P-positive cells in untreated embryos occurred at 19.5 hpi and that after 21 hpi, H3S10P was no longer detected as a result of all control zygotes having finished their cleavage. However, in the H2O2-treated group, the percentage of H3S10P-positive cells peaked at 22.0 hpi, indicating that prometaphase/metaphase entry was delayed. Additionally, the duration of prometaphase/metaphase in treated zygotes was prolonged relative to that observed in the control group. Because the SAC can delay chromosome segregation at prometaphase or metaphase in response to DNA damage [14, 15], we considered the delay observed in the treated group as resulting from SAC activation. Furthermore, we observed a small peak at 19.5 hpi in the treated group prior to the appearance of the maximum peak and suggesting zygote heterogeneity in response to oxidative damage, with some zygotes either being insensitive to mild oxidative damage or exhibiting an inactive checkpoint. Based on these results, we chose times from 19.0 hpi to 19.5 hpi and 21.5 hpi to 22.5 hpi for detection of the SAC markers MAD2LI and TTK in control and treated zygotes, respectively.

The metaphase-anaphase transition is mediated by the ubiquitin protein ligase APC/C [40] under the control of a network of regulatory factors, including cell division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), cadherin 1 (CDH1), and MAD2L1. CDC20 and CDH1 can activate APC, whereas MAD2L1 acts as an APC/C inhibitor. When the SAC is activated, MAD2L1 forms a ternary complex with CDC20 and the protein kinase BUBR1 to form the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) and prevent APC/C activation, thereby arresting cells at prometaphase [41]. As a critical mediator of MCC formation and APC/C activation [26, 42], MAD2L1 also plays a key role in SAC functions [19]; therefore, its detection represents a significant determinant of SAC activated. Here, our results (Figure 5) showed that MAD2L1 was enriched in the nucleus in response to oxidative damage, providing further evidence of SAC activation following oxidative damage in zygotes. The SAC monitors microtubule tension and attachment at kinetochores to ensure proper chromosome segregation [43], and MAD2L1 localization in the nuclei is regulated by attachment, not tension. Even a single unattached kinetochore is sufficient to activate MAD2L1 nucleocytoplasmic transport and delay anaphase [20]. Therefore, our findings suggested that oxidative stress was capable of activating the SAC based on dysregulated kinetochore-microtubule attachment.

In addition to the spatial and temporal regulation of MAD2L1 localization during cell cycle progression and SAC activation, two MAD2L1 conformations with distinct topologies are also vital to the SAC: the open (O) and closed (C) MAD2L1 conformation [26]. Only the C-MAD2L1 conformation obtained following associating with MAD1 or CDC20 can allow blockage of anaphase progression by inhibiting APC/C activation for SAC signaling [22, 26, 42]. A significant function associated with TTK involving cell cycle control concerns conversion of cytosolic MAD2L1 from an inactive open conformation (O-MAD2L1) to a closed conformation (C-MAD2L1) [21]. Another important finding of this study was elevated TTK expression in zygotes exposed to oxidative stress, suggesting a relationship between TTK expression and oxidative stress. Our findings also suggested that during SAC signaling, MAD2L1 recruitment to kinetochores by TTK also occurred upon the initiation of oxidative damage in zygotes [21, 22, 27]. However, TTK only appears to be required for SAC function following spindle damage and not during unperturbed mitosis [44, 45]. By contrast, other SAC components restrain mitosis in the absence of spindle damage [45]. Therefore, as an indicator of SAC activation, our observation of TTK expression in H2O2-treated zygotes represented additional evidence of SAC activation following oxidative damage.

The SAC is required for regulating mitotic cell cycle progression to ensure mitotic fidelity during preimplantation development in mouse cleavage-stage embryos [9, 46]. The primary role of the SAC is to ensure that all chromosomes are bioriented and accurately attached to spindle microtubules prior to anaphase initiation, thereby contributing to the prevention of aneuploidy by blocking anaphase onset until correct kinetochore-microtubule attachment and tension are attained [16]. Otherwise, errors in chromosome segregation or distribution might result in aneuploid-embryo formation, potentially resulting in implantation failure, spontaneous abortion, genetic diseases, or embryonic death [9]. Embryonic aneuploidy in gametes or early embryos is already the leading cause of IVF failure [7, 9]. Studies of the relationships between oxidative stress and SAC aid in promoting strategies to avoid spontaneous abortion and low rates of reproductive success. However, a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms associated with SAC activation and aneuploid-embryo formation related to oxidative stress is necessary.

5. Conclusion

Our results showed that treatment of zygotes with 0.03 mM H2O2 did not influence the formation of 2-cell embryos, 4-cell embryos, or 8-cell embryos but did reduce rates of blastocyst formation, which was similar to developmental phenomena observed clinically in relation to embryos experiencing oxidative damage. Additionally, we observed DNA damage H2O2-treated zygotes based on the detection of γH2AX, the induction of metaphase delay during initial mitosis of zygotes, and the time of appearance of H3S10P. Furthermore, detection of MAD2L1 and TTK expression by immunofluorescence suggested the involvement of SAC activation in this delay. Given that SAC is largely responsible for chromosome stability, its activation is conducive to avoiding spontaneous abortion resulting from aneuploidy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30872771, no. 81070542, no. 81471522, and no. 81671536), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (no.8151503102000010, no. 10151503102000020, and no. 2014A030313482), and the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project (2016A020218015).

References

  1. M. Takahashi, “Oxidative stress and redox regulation on in vitro development of mammalian embryos,” Journal of Reproduction and Development, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. T. Bain, P. Madan, and D. H. Betts, “The early embryo response to intracellular reactive oxygen species is developmentally regulated,” Reproduction Fertility and Development, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 561–575, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Kimura, S. Tsunoda, Y. Iuchi, H. Abe, K. Totsukawa, and J. Fujii, “Intrinsic oxidative stress causes either 2-cell arrest or cell death depending on developmental stage of the embryos from SOD1-deficient mice,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 441–451, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Liu and D. L. Keefe, “Cytoplasm mediates both development and oxidation-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse zygotes,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1828–1834, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. J. Gille and H. Joenje, “Cell culture models for oxidative stress: superoxide and hydrogen peroxide versus normobaric hyperoxia,” Mutation Research/DNAging, vol. 275, no. 3–6, pp. 405–414, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. L. Fava, M. Kaulich, E. A. Nigg, and A. Santamaria, “Probing the in vivo function of Mad1:C-Mad2 in the spindle assembly checkpoint,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 3322–3336, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Bolton, S. J. Graham, N. Van der Aa et al., “Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, article 11165, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. H. Wang and Q. Y. Sun, “Meiotic spindle, spindle checkpoint and embryonic aneuploidy,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 11, pp. 620–636, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Wei, S. Multi, C. R. Yang et al., “Spindle assembly checkpoint regulates mitotic cell cycle progression during preimplantation embryo development,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, article e21557, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. Ventura-Juncá, I. Irarrázaval, A. J. Rolle, J. I. Gutiérrez, R. D. Moreno, and M. J. Santos, “In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans,” Biological Research, vol. 48, p. 68, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Thomas, A. Sparks, G. Ryan, and B. J. Van Voorhis, “Clinical predictors of human blastocyst formation and pregnancy after extended embryo culture and transfer,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 543–548, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Meuter, L.-M. Rogmann, B. J. Winterhoff, T. Tchkonia, J. L. Kirkland, and D. E. Morbeck, “Markers of cellular senescence are elevated in murine blastocysts cultured in vitro: molecular consequences of culture in atmospheric oxygen,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1259–1267, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Musacchio and E. D. Salmon, “The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 379–393, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. A. Foley and T. M. Kapoor, “Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 25–37, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. S. Lawrence, T. Chau, and J. Engebrecht, “DNA damage response and spindle assembly checkpoint function throughout the cell cycle to ensure genomic integrity,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 11, no. 4, article e1005150, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. Maciejewska, Z. Polanski, K. Kisiel, J. Z. Kubiak, and M. A. Ciemerych, “Spindle assembly checkpoint-related failure perturbs early embryonic divisions and reduces reproductive performance of LT/Sv mice,” Reproduction, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 931–942, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. J. Hendzel, Y. Wei, M. A. Mancini et al., “Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation,” Chromosoma, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 348–360, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  18. B. Perez-Cadahia, B. Drobic, and J. R. Davie, “H3 phosphorylation: dual role in mitosis and interphase,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 695–709, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Sikora-Polaczek, A. Hupalowska, Z. Polanski, J. Z. Kubiak, and M. A. Ciemerych, “The first mitosis of the mouse embryo is prolonged by transitional metaphase arrest,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 734–743, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. C. Waters, R. Chen, A. W. Murray, and E. D. Salmon, “Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 1181–1191, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Hewitt, A. Tighe, S. Santaguida et al., “Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1–C-Mad2 core complex,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Maldonado and T. M. Kapoor, “Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. X. Luo, Z. Tang, J. Rizo, and H. Yu, “The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20,” Molecular Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. Sironi, M. Mapelli, S. Knapp, A. De Antoni, K. T. Jeang, and A. Musacchio, “Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2496–2506, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. DeAntoni, V. Sala, and A. Musacchio, “Explaining the oligomerization properties of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Mad2,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 360, no. 1455, pp. 637–647, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Mapelli, L. Massimiliano, S. Santaguida, and A. Musacchio, “The Mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 730–743, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Qian, Z. Li, Y. Zhang et al., “Response of mouse zygotes treated with mild hydrogen peroxide as a model to reveal novel mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced injury in early embryos,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 1521428, 11 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. Zhang, D. Qian, Z. Li et al., “Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage of mouse zygotes triggers G2/M checkpoint and phosphorylates Cdc25 and Cdc2,” Cell Stress & Chaperones, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 687–696, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. N. Ciray, T. Aksoy, K. Yaramanci, I. Karayaka, and M. Bahceci, “In vitro culture under physiologic oxygen concentration improves blastocyst yield and quality: a prospective randomized survey on sibling oocytes,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, 4 Supplement, pp. 1459–1461, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. E. Kasterstein, D. Strassburger, D. Komarovsky et al., “The effect of two distinct levels of oxygen concentration on embryo development in a sibling oocyte study,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1073–1079, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Benzina, A. Pitaval, C. Lemercier et al., “A kinome-targeted RNAi-based screen links FGF signaling to H2AX phosphorylation in response to radiation,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 18, pp. 3559–3573, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. Turinetto and C. Giachino, “Multiple facets of histone variant H2AX: a DNA double-strand-break marker with several biological functions,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2489–2498, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. E. Redon, A. J. Nakamura, Y. Zhang et al., “Histone γH2AX and poly(ADP ribose) as clinical pharmacodynamic biomarkers,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 4532–4542, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Li, Y. Yu, S.-C. Lee, T. Ishibashi, S. P. Lees-Miller, and J. Ausió, “Phosphorylation of histone H2A.X by DNA-dependent protein kinase is not affected by core histone acetylation, but it alters nucleosome stability and histone H1 binding,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 23, pp. 17778–17788, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Song, Z. Li, B. Wang, J. Xiao, X. Wang, and J. Huang, “Phospho-Cdc25 correlates with activating G2/M checkpoint in mouse zygotes fertilized with hydrogen peroxide-treated mouse sperm,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 396, no. 1-2, pp. 41–48, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. Wang, Z. Li, C. Wang et al., “Zygotic G2/M cell cycle arrest induced by ATM/Chk1 activation and DNA repair in mouse embryos fertilized with hydrogen peroxide-treated epididymal mouse sperm,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, article e73987, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Liu, J. R. Trimarchi, and D. L. Keefe, “Involvement of mitochondria in oxidative stress-induced cell death in mouse zygotes,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1745–1753, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Dotiwala, J. C. Harrison, S. Jain, N. Sugawara, and J. E. Haber, “Mad2 prolongs DNA damage checkpoint arrest caused by a double-strand break via a centromere-dependent mechanism,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 328–332, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Prigent and S. Dimitrov, “Phosphorylation of serine 10 in histone H3, what for?” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 116, Part 18, pp. 3677–3685, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Nasmyth, “How do so few control so many?” Cell, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 739–746, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. Fang, H. Yu, and M. W. Kirschner, “Control of mitotic transitions by the anaphase-promoting complex,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 354, no. 1389, pp. 1583–1590, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. C. Chao, K. Kulkarni, Z. Zhang, E. H. Kong, and D. Barford, “Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex,” Nature, vol. 484, no. 7393, pp. 208–213, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. B. Shannon, J. C. Canman, and E. D. Salmon, “Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3706–3719, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. M. Stucke, C. Baumann, and E. A. Nigg, “Kinetochore localization and microtubule interaction of the human spindle checkpoint kinase Mps1,” Chromosoma, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Schmidt, Y. Budirahardja, R. Klompmaker, and R. H. Medema, “Ablation of the spindle assembly checkpoint by a compound targeting Mps1,” EMBO Reports, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 866–872, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. Meraldi, V. M. Draviam, and P. K. Sorger, “Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression,” Developmental Cell, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Que Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

708 Views | 536 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.