Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disease

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 4157213 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4157213

Judith Stein, Sebastian Steven, Matthias Bros, Stephan Sudowe, Michael Hausding, Matthias Oelze, Thomas Münzel, Stephan Grabbe, Angelika Reske-Kunz, Andreas Daiber, "Role of Protein Kinase C and Nox2-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species Formation in the Activation and Maturation of Dendritic Cells by Phorbol Ester and Lipopolysaccharide", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 4157213, 12 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4157213

Role of Protein Kinase C and Nox2-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species Formation in the Activation and Maturation of Dendritic Cells by Phorbol Ester and Lipopolysaccharide

Academic Editor: Leopoldo Aguilera-Aguirre
Received18 Nov 2016
Revised07 Feb 2017
Accepted08 Feb 2017
Published28 Mar 2017


Aims. Activation/maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) plays a central role in adaptive immune responses by antigen processing and (cross-) activation of T cells. There is ongoing discussion on the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in these processes and with the present study we investigated this enigmatic pathway. Methods and Results. DCs were cultured from precursors in the bone marrow of mice (BM-DCs) and analyzed for ROS formation, maturation, and T cell stimulatory capacity upon stimulation with phorbol ester (PDBu) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). LPS stimulation of BM-DCs caused maturation with moderate intracellular ROS formation, whereas PDBu treatment resulted in maturation with significant ROS formation. The NADPH oxidase inhibitors apocynin/VAS2870 and genetic gp91phox deletion both decreased the ROS signal in PDBu-stimulated BM-DCs without affecting maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity of BM-DCs. In contrast, the protein kinase C inhibitors chelerythrine/Gö6983 decreased PDBu-stimulated ROS formation in BM-DCs as well as maturation. Conclusion. Obviously Nox2-dependent ROS formation in BM-DCs is not always required for their maturation or T cell stimulatory potential. PDBu/LPS-triggered BM-DC maturation rather relies on phosphorylation cascades. Our results question the role of oxidative stress as an essential “danger signal” for BM-DC activation, although we cannot exclude contribution by other ROS sources.

1. Introduction

Immune cells provide protection of the organism from invading microbial pathogens. The immune system with its various cell types can be divided into innate immune system (e.g., PMN or NK cells) and adaptive immune response (e.g., lymphocytes). Dendritic cells (DCs) serve as a messenger between adaptive and innate immune response [1]. A key event in the adaptive immune response consists of the priming or sensitization of resting T cells, which is a prerequisite for any antigen-induced cellular adaptive immune response. T cell activation largely depends on efficient presentation of antigen fragments by antigen-presenting cells such as DCs. The latter are located in tissues with close contact to the external environment like skin (Langerhans cells) or epithelium of lungs and intestines. DC-dependent activation of T cells also contributes to the development of arterial hypertension [2]. This underlines the clinical relevance of DC activation/maturation for cardiovascular disease. It is known that platelet activation during the course of vascular injury or bleeding and subsequent CD40L release provides a “danger signal” that activates DCs at the site of blood vessel damage and thus facilitates the induction of local T cell-mediated immune responses. In addition, other “danger signals” such as bacterial or fungal endotoxins (e.g., lipopolysaccharide [LPS] or zymosan A), tissue injury markers (e.g., uric acid, hyaluronic acid), immune activation (e.g., CD40L, inflammatory cytokines), and even angiotensin II cause potent activation/maturation of DC [2, 3]. Therefore, an inflammatory and thrombotic environment represents a major trigger for DC activation, maturation, and infiltration, and subsequent immune responses leading to atherothrombotic events in the vasculature.

In addition to the above-described classical “danger signals,” DCs may also become activated by oxidative stress, either via direct immunomodulatory actions of ROS on proteins in immune cells or on mediators of inflammation (e.g., oxLDL, isoketals, and other lipid peroxidation products) [411]. In support of this notion, it was shown that oxidative stress in the bone marrow upregulates TNFα leading to activation of DCs [12] and that vascular oxidative stress leads to DC activation, adhesion, and transmigration [13]. However, cigarette smoke-induced oxidative stress suppressed the generation of key cytokines by maturing DCs through the activation of ERK-dependent pathways [14]. In turn, ROS have been demonstrated to activate NADPH oxidases in a protein kinase C-dependent fashion [15] opening the opportunity to activate the DC NADPH oxidase (Nox2 isoform). Several publications ascribe an important role of Nox2-derived ROS in antigen processing and presentation by controlling the pH of the phagosome [1618]. Protein kinase C (isoform α) not only is an essential activator of Nox2 activity but also regulates cytokine production of DCs in a MyD88- and toll-like receptor- (TLR-) dependent fashion [19].

With the present study we sought to investigate the role of protein kinase C and Nox2-derived ROS in DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Treatment Protocol

C57BL/6, BALB/cJ, and gp91phox knockout mice were obtained from the Translational Animal Research Center of the University Medical Center Mainz and maintained under pathogen-free conditions on a standard diet.

Hemizygous mice (Nox2 knockout (#2365), C57BL/6 background, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were generated as described previously [20] and C57BL/6 mice were used as the corresponding wild type controls. Mice were sacrificed under isoflurane anesthesia and femurs and tibias were recovered for generation of BM-DCs. Animal treatment was in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as adopted and promulgated by the US National Institutes of Health and was approved by the Ethics Commission according to the German Law on the Protection of Animals (Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Koblenz, Germany: #23 177-07/G 10-1-054, #23 170-07/G 07-1-023).

2.2. Bone Marrow-Derived DCs

BM-DCs were generated as first described by Scheicher et al. [21] and modified by Bros et al. [22]. Shortly, bone marrow cells (2 × 106 cells/10 ml) were cultured in IMDM supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FCS (Gibco, Paisley, UK), 2 mM L-glutamine (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (both PAA, Pasching, Austria), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Roth), and 5% GM-CSF-containing cell culture supernatant derived from X63.Ag8-653 myeloma cells stably transfected with a murine GM-CSF expression construct [23] on bacterial dishes (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany). BM-DC culture medium was replenished on day 3 and day 6 of culture. On day 7, immature BM-DCs were harvested, centrifuged, reseeded in 6-well nontissue culture treated plates (1 × 106 cells/2 ml), and cultured for another 24 hours.

2.3. Detection of Extracellular and Intracellular ROS Formation of Cultured BM-DCs

Oxidative burst of cultured BM-DCs (24-well, 1 × 106 cells/well, day 8) was induced by phorbol ester dibutyrate (PDBu, 10 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) or LPS (50 μg/ml) (Calbiochem) using L-012- (100 μM-) enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) in PBS (1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+) on a Centro plate reader (Berthold Technology, Bad Wildbad, Germany). In some experiments, inhibitors of NADPH oxidase, apocynin (150 or 300 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) or VAS2870 (20 μM, Sigma-Aldrich), or the protein kinase C inhibitors chelerythrine (10, 50, and 100 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) or Gö6983 (0.1, 1, 10 μM, Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the cells 20 min before addition of the L-012 dye and stimulation with PDBu or LPS. ROS formation by BM-DCs (24-well, 2 × 105 cells/well) was also tested by dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCF-DA, 20 μM) or dihydroethidium (DHE, 1 μM) fluorescence using a Mithras 2 fluorescence plate reader for DCF-DA (Berthold Techn., Bad Wildbad, Germany; filters for excitation:  nm, emission:  nm) and fluorescence microscopy for DHE (Axiovert, Zeiss). DCF-DA was added with the inhibitor to the cells 20 min before stimulation with PDBu or LPS.

2.4. Detection of Intracellular ROS Generation by Flow Cytometry (FACS)

On day 8 of culture, an aliquot of BM-DCs was incubated with the dye CM-DCF-DA (5 μM/1 × 106/ml) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for 30 min, while another aliquot was left untreated. Cells were stimulated with LPS (1.5 μg/ml), various concentrations of PDBu (0.1 μM, 1 μM, or 10 μM), PMA (50 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), zymosan A (50 μg/ml, life technologies), lipoteichoic acid (10 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich), activating antiCD40 Ab (10 μg/ml), mouse recombinant soluble CD40L (0.5 μg/ml, ImmunoTools, Frisoythe, Germany), TNF-α/IL-1β (10 ng/mg each, ImmunoTools), or remained unstimulated as a control for the time points indicated. Cells were harvested and washed in staining buffer (PBS/2% FCS). To avoid Fc receptor-mediated nonspecific binding of antibodies (Ab), cells were incubated for 15 min on ice with a rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Ab (clone 2.4G2, purified from hybridoma supernatant). Cell surface was stained with a phycoerythrin- (PE-) conjugated Ab recognizing CD11c (clone N418, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) and a phycoerythrin-cyanine 5- (PE-Cy5-) conjugated Ab recognizing MHCII (clone M5/114, eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Suitable isotype control Abs were used. Flow cytometry measurement was performed using a FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software. In particular, DCs were identified by the expression of the surface marker CD11c (named CD11c+ cells), and these were subsequently subdivided into expressing DCs and expressing DCs as indicated in suppl. Figure S available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4157213. ROS generation was analyzed in both subpopulations.

2.5. Detection of Maturation Using FACS

Stimulated and unstimulated BM-DCs were harvested and Fc-receptor block was performed as described above. Cell surface was stained with the following Abs: fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) conjugated anti-CD11c (clone N418, Miltenyi Biotec), PE-conjugated anti-CD86 (clone GL1, eBioscience), and PE-Cy5-conjugated anti-MHCII (clone M5/114, eBioscience). Cells were fixed with 0.7% paraformaldehyde (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in PBS and subjected to FACS analysis as described above. As described above, DCs were defined as CD11c+ cells, and expression of and characterized these cells as mature DCs as indicated in suppl. Figure S.

2.6. Allogeneic T Cell Stimulation Assays

Splenic BALB/cJ T cells (3 × 105) enriched by nylon wool adherence as described [24] were cocultured with serially diluted C57BL/6 or BM-DCs (start concentration: 5 × 104) in triplicates in 200 μl culture medium without GM-CSF in 96-well flat-bottom plates for 4 days. Proliferation was assessed by measuring the genomic incorporation of [3H] thymidine (0.25 μCi/well), which was added for the last 16 h of the culture. Cells were harvested onto glass fiber filters and retained radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (1205 Betaplate, LKB Wallac, Turcu, Finland).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistically significant differences were assessed by using one-way ANOVA for comparisons of groups followed by pairwise comparison analysis using Holm-Sidak. values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (, , and ). Analysis was performed for most data by using SigmaPlot 12.3 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA) and for chemiluminescence and fluorescence data of ROS formation by employing Prism 6 for Windows, version 6.05, GraphPad Software.

3. Results

3.1. LPS and the PKC-Activator PDBu Promote BM-DC Maturation, but Only PDBu Increases Intracellular ROS Formation in BM-DCs

In a set of pilot experiments, we observed that the phorbol ester PDBu induced a concentration-dependent increase in ROS formation in cells, whereas maturation was augmented by the lowest concentration of PDBu and showed only marginal further increase at higher concentrations of PDBu (Figure 1(a)). In contrast, the endotoxin LPS at all concentrations employed increased the maturation of BM-DCs to a similar extent but led to a less pronounced augmentation of the ROS formation rate as compared to PDBu (Figure 1(a)). Puzzled by this obvious dissociation between ROS formation and maturation in BM-DCs we tested a set of different stimulators of BM-DC maturation. We found that only phorbol esters induced ROS formation and maturation, whereas all other classical stimulators induced maturation without significant ROS formation (Figure 1(b)). In order to exclude artificial ROS signals by FACS analysis, we tested other ROS detection methods. Staining of cultured BM-DCs with the fluorescence dyes dihydroethidium (DHE) or dihydrodichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) revealed a quite similar increase in intracellular ROS formation upon stimulation of BM-DCs with PDBu or LPS (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Due to a high background signal, the increase in ROS formation upon stimulation with PDBu or LPS was less obvious with DCF-DA but was significantly suppressed by the NADPH oxidase inhibitor VAS2870. Using the luminol analogue and chemiluminescence dye L-012 we established a time course for PDBu- and LPS-induced extracellular ROS formation by BM-DCs with maxima at 20 and 40 min, respectively (Figure 2(c)). Maximal ROS formation revealed by L-012 ECL was approximately 10-fold more pronounced with PDBu stimulation as compared with the LPS-treated group. Therefore, the overall ROS signal induced by the two stimulators largely depends on the site of ROS measurement and the employed dye.

More detailed FACS analysis confirmed these initial findings on the dissociation between ROS formation and maturation of BM-DCs. Only PDBu, but not LPS, resulted in a significant increase in ROS formation by BM-DCs at 15 and 120 min (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), whereas both stimuli increased the maturation at 24 h after stimulation to a similar degree (Figure 3(c)). Furthermore, T cell stimulatory capacity of BM-DCs was increased by PDBu and LPS (Figure 3(d)).

3.2. PDBu-Induced Maturation of BM-DCs Can Be Blocked by PKC-Inhibition and Does Not Depend on Nox2-Derived ROS Formation

Since previous studies identified the NADPH oxidase system (mainly the Nox2 isoform) as a potent source of ROS in activated BM-DCs, we tested the effect of the pharmacological inhibitor of NADPH oxidase-derived ROS formation, apocynin, on the ROS signal, and maturation of BM-DCs. We established a concentration-dependent inhibition of BM-DC-derived extracellular ROS formation by apocynin and the known Nox2 inhibitor nebivolol [25, 26] (Figure 4(a)). Also, LPS-induced extracellular ROS formation by BM-DCs was decreased by apocynin in a dose-dependent fashion (Figure 4(b)). In contrast, apocynin only caused a minor inhibition of maturation (Figure 4(c)) but a more pronounced loss of T cell stimulatory capacity (Figure 4(d)) of PDBu-stimulated BM-DCs. The latter would be compatible with numerous reports on a role of Nox2 in antigen presentation by BM-DCs that is based on pH modulation in the phagosome [1618].

Since apocynin, especially at higher concentrations, has direct antioxidant properties [27], we also tested genetic deletion of the Nox2 subunit gp91phox in order to characterize the role of Nox2-derived ROS in BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity. Although we observed a significant decrease in ROS formation by PDBu-stimulated BM-DCs of gp91phox-deficient as compared with control mice (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)), neither maturation nor T cell stimulatory capacity was significantly impaired in gp91phox-deficient animals upon PDBu stimulation (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). However, since PDBu-induced ROS formation was not completely absent in BM-DCs without gp91phox, we cannot exclude contribution of other sources of ROS (e.g., mitochondria or other Nox isoforms) to BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity.

Nox2 activation is mainly mediated by PKC [28], which in turn was reported to essentially contribute to DC cytokine production [19]. We therefore tested the effect of the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine on BM-DC-derived ROS formation and maturation. Chelerythrine induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of PDBu- and LPS-induced BM-DC-derived extracellular ROS formation (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). Also PDBu-induced intracellular ROS formation by BM-DCs (measured by FACS analysis) was decreased by chelerythrine in a dose-dependent fashion (Figure 6(c)). LPS-triggered ROS formation was clearly less pronounced as compared to the PDBu-treated group. PDBu-triggered BM-DC maturation was completely abolished by chelerythrine (Figure 6(d)). In an independent experiment we showed that the Nox2 inhibitor VAS2870 as well as the alternative PKC inhibitor Gö6983 inhibited the PDBu or LPS-stimulated extracellular ROS signal in BM-DCs (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). As shown for chelerythrine, also Gö6983 decreased the PDBu-triggered BM-DC maturation (Figure 7(c)).

4. Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrate that the phorbol ester PDBu like LPS, which are classical stimulators for oxidative burst in PMN, trigger BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity. We aimed to identify the role of oxidative stress in BM-DC maturation and found that PDBu and to a minor extent also LPS induced intracellular ROS formation in BM-DCs. Interestingly, inhibition of NADPH-oxidase by apocynin, VAS2870, or genetic knock-out of Nox2 subunit gp91phox had only minor or no effect on BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity. However, inhibition of protein kinase C by chelerythrine or Gö6983 inhibited both PDBu-induced maturation and ROS formation. Taken together, we here provide evidence against an essential role of intracellular Nox2-derived ROS formation in BM-DC maturation by PDBu and LPS.

The phagocyte NADPH oxidase Nox2 is a well-known player in host defense of the innate immune system, and there is increasing evidence for a role of Nox2 in adaptive immunity [2931]. Patients suffering from chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) have a higher susceptibility to autoimmune diseases like lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis [32, 33]. Maturation of DCs is part of the pathogenesis of such autoimmune diseases [34]. Nox2-deficient mice crossed onto a lupus-prone genetic background () develop higher antibody titer and a more severe clinical picture of the disease than control mice [35]. Furthermore, Nox2 is involved in antigen presentation by BM-DCs, which is based on pH modulation in the phagosome [1618].

However, the role of Nox2-derived ROS in autoimmune disease is not clear until now and the literature data reflect a quite contradictory picture of the role of ROS formation in DC maturation. It was shown that ROS-low DCs displayed a more pronounced response to TLR agonists like LPS and zymosan, followed by accelerated maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity as compared with ROS-high DCs, which showed increased MAPK signaling, adhesion and hydrogen peroxide release indicating their role in immediate microbial targeting [36]. In contrast, liposome-driven ROS formation and chemokine (ERK-dependent)/cytokine (MAPK-dependent) production were all prevented by unspecific antioxidants (TEMPO and ebselen), an inhibitor of flavin-dependent oxidoreductases including NADPH oxidases (diphenyl iodonium) and a MAPK inhibitor (SB203580) [37]. Although representing an unspecific approach, cigarette smoke extract induced ROS formation, production of the chemokines CCL3 and CXCL2, and NFκB activation in a TLR-dependent fashion, all of which were prevented by the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine [38]. Another unspecific approach was based on LPS-triggered ROS formation by DCs and their activation (maturation, cytokine production, and T cell stimulatory potential), all of which were prevented by the antioxidant ebselen [39], however, keeping in mind that this compound is an unspecific inhibitor of thiol-dependent enzymes [40]. Also, treatment with a glutathione ester successfully prevented LPS-induced mitochondrial ROS formation (measured by electron spin resonance spectroscopy) and cytokine production [41]. Mitochondrial ROS formation was demonstrated to be an essential contributor to DC differentiation since the complex I inhibitor rotenone but also catalase in the culture medium decreased DC-derived ROS levels and markers of differentiation, pointing towards an essential role of mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide in this process [41]. This is in line with the observation that mitochondrial ROS can trigger hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent reprogramming and switch to glycolysis in various cell types including DC [42, 43].

Previously it was shown that NADPH oxidase-derived ROS did not contribute to DC differentiation, maturation, cytokine production, and induction of T cell proliferation, since DC generated from patients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) displayed normal function [44]. Likewise, treatment with a ROS scavenger also had no effect in the hands of these authors. In contrast, NADPH oxidase activation was essential for DC-mediated killing of intracellular E. coli [44], which is supported by various cases indicating exacerbated inflammatory reactions upon bacterial infections of CGD patients [45]. In line with this previous observations, our data indicate a minor role of Nox2-derived ROS formation for BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity upon activation by PDBu or LPS. Nevertheless, since neither PDBu-induced nor LPS-induced ROS formation was completely absent in BM-DCs without gp91phox, it might be speculated whether other sources of ROS (e.g., mitochondria or other Nox isoforms) contribute to BM-DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity. Also, as shown in multiple studies on experimental sepsis (endotoxemia), LPS-dependent activation of immune cells is associated with appreciable levels of ROS formation, which most likely originate from mitochondria and NADPH oxidases [46, 47]. In general, it is also well known that ROS over production in immune cells leads to cell dysfunction and impaired/unregulated immune response and end organ damage [4851], although in some rare diseases also insufficient ROS production may contribute to uncontrolled inflammatory conditions [52]. In most cases, this implies that even in LPS models ROS may play a role in the activation of immune cells as well as resolution of inflammation, as shown for mitochondrial ROS in LPS-primed bone marrow-derived macrophages [53]. In support of this it was shown in several experimental sepsis models that LPS-induced ROS formation is decreased and survival is improved in endotoxemic gp91phox knockout mice or by pretreatment with apocynin [5456]. In contrast, in human genetic gp91phox deficiency (like in CGD patients) even exacerbation of LPS-induced inflammation was reported [45].

In conclusion, we provide evidence for an important role of protein kinase C in BM-DC maturation, since PKC blockade by chelerythrine or Gö6983 inhibited PDBu-dependent BM-DC maturation. There are only few reports on PKC stimulatory effects on BM-DC maturation, but it was reported to essentially contribute to DC cytokine production [19].

5. Limitations

A major problem in the comparison of the different studies on DC-dependent ROS production and its impact on maturation might be the exact time point of measurement. As long as no kinetics of ROS formation are provided it is hard to assign the signal to a certain source of ROS. Also the fact that FACS analyses are restricted to the measurement of intracellular ROS formation represents a major limitation of the previous studies on effects of ROS on DC maturation and T cell stimulatory capacity.

Moreover, in vivo activation and maturation of DC are multifactorial and antigen/disease specific [3, 57]. Of note, other sources of ROS (e.g., mitochondria) as well as oxidation products generated by ROS (e.g., oxLDL, reactive aldehydes, and isoketals) are known to contribute to DC activation and maturation [6, 911]. Likewise, ROS from external Nox2 sources (e.g., other activated immune cells) could trigger BM-DC maturation in vivo. These “external” factors could be missing in our BM-DC cell culture model. In fact, our present data indicate that not all DC activation and maturation require ROS but may solely depend on the toll-like receptor activation and cell signaling pathways such as PKC.

The identification of the specific PKC isoform(s) that contribute to this ROS independent signaling by future experiments would provide important molecular insights in the activation mechanisms of DCs.

6. Conclusions and Clinical Implications

Our findings question the concept that Nox2-dependent ROS formation in BM-DCs is required for their maturation or their T cell stimulatory potential (based on the absence of any effect of gp91phox deficiency or the NADPH oxidase inhibitor apocynin). The observed phorbol ester-triggered BM-DC maturation seems to rather depend on phosphorylation cascades than on Nox2-derived ROS formation (based on the observed effects with the PKC inhibitors chelerythrine and Gö6983). However, we cannot exclude that other sources of ROS in DCs (e.g., mitochondria) or ROS coming from external Nox2 sources (e.g., other immune cells) or ROS-generated oxidized DC activators such as lipid oxidation products contribute to BM-DC maturation and their T cell stimulatory potential in vivo. Since DCs provide an essential link between adaptive and innate immune response and confer the priming or sensitization of resting T cells, which is a prerequisite for any antigen-induced cellular adaptive immune response, their activation represents a fundamental mechanism in all kinds of immune responses but also progression of autoimmune diseases and low-grade inflammation triggered cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurodegenerative pathologies. Our results question the role of oxidative stress as an essential “danger signal” for BM-DC activation.

Competing Interests

The authors have no financial conflict to declare.

Authors’ Contributions

Judith Stein, Sebastian Steven, Angelika Reske-Kunz, and Andreas Daiber contributed equally and should be considered as joint first and senior authors.


The authors acknowledge Jörg Schreiner and Evelyn Montermann for their excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by funds from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EO1003, TRP A3 and a Virchow Fellowship) to Andreas Daiber and Sebastian Steven and Stephan Grabbe.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary material explains the gating strategy for FACS analyses: suppl. Figure 1S “ROS detection” and suppl. Figure 2S “maturation status”.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. G. Nace, J. Evankovich, R. Eid, and A. Tsung, “Dendritic cells and damage-associated molecular patterns: endogenous danger signals linking innate and adaptive immunity,” Journal of Innate Immunity, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 6–15, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Xiao, A. Kirabo, J. Wu et al., “Renal denervation prevents immune cell activation and renal inflammation in Angiotensin II-induced hypertension,” Circulation Research, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 547–557, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Reis E Sousa, “Dendritic cells in a mature age,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 476–483, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Abderrazak, T. Syrovets, D. Couchie et al., “NLRP3 inflammasome: from a danger signal sensor to a regulatory node of oxidative stress and inflammatory diseases,” Redox Biology, vol. 4, pp. 296–307, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Lei, K. Wang, L. Deng, Y. Chen, E. C. Nice, and C. Huang, “Redox regulation of inflammation: old elements, a new story,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 306–340, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. G. McMaster, A. Kirabo, M. S. Madhur, and D. G. Harrison, “Inflammation, immunity, and hypertensive end-organ damage,” Circulation Research, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1022–1033, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Janko, M. Filipović, L. E. Munoz et al., “Redox modulation of HMGB1-related signaling,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1075–1085, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Wenzel, S. Kossmann, T. Münzel, and A. Daiber, “Redox regulation of cardiovascular inflammation—immunomodulatory function of mitochondrial and Nox-derived reactive oxygen and nitrogen species,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Kirabo, V. Fontana, A. P. C. De Faria et al., “DC isoketal-modified proteins activate T cells and promote hypertension,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 4642–4656, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Frostegard, Y. Zhang, J. Sun, K. Yan, and A. Liu, “Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein (OxLDL)-treated dendritic cells promote activation of T cells in human atherosclerotic plaque and blood, which is repressed by statins: microRNA let-7c is integral to the effect,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 5, no. 9, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Perrin-Cocon, F. Coutant, S. Agaugué, S. Deforges, P. André, and V. Lotteau, “Oxidized low-density lipoprotein promotes mature dendritic cell transition from differentiating monocyte,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 7, pp. 3785–3891, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Grassi, G. Tell, M. Robbie-Ryan et al., “Oxidative stress causes bone loss in estrogen-deficient mice through enhanced bone marrow dendritic cell activation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 38, pp. 15087–15092, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W.-G. Zhu, S. Li, L.-Q. Lin, H. Yan, T. Fu, and J.-H. Zhu, “Vascular oxidative stress increases dendritic cell adhesion and transmigration induced by homocysteine,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 254, no. 2, pp. 110–116, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. R. Kroening, T. W. Barnes, L. Pease, A. Limper, H. Kita, and R. Vassallo, “Cigarette smoke-induced oxidative stress suppresses generation of dendritic cell IL-12 and IL-23 through ERK-dependent pathways,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 1536–1547, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. K. Doughan, D. G. Harrison, and S. I. Dikalov, “Molecular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction: linking mitochondrial oxidative damage and vascular endothelial dysfunction,” Circulation Research, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 488–496, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Savina, C. Jancic, S. Hugues et al., “NOX2 controls phagosomal pH to regulate antigen processing during crosspresentation by dendritic cells,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 205–218, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Jancic, A. Savina, C. Wasmeier et al., “Rab27a regulates phagosomal pH and NADPH oxidase recruitment to dendritic cell phagosomes,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 367–378, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. R. Mantegazza, A. Savina, M. Vermeulen et al., “NADPH oxidase controls phagosomal pH and antigen cross-presentation in human dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 12, pp. 4712–4722, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Langlet, C. Springael, J. Johnson et al., “PKC-α controls MYD88-dependent TLR/IL-1R signaling and cytokine production in mouse and human dendritic cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 505–515, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. D. Pollock, D. A. Williams, M. A. C. Gifford et al., “Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production,” Nature Genetics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 202–209, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Scheicher, M. Mehlig, R. Zecher, and K. Reske, “Dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow: in vitro differentiation using low doses of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Bros, E. Montermann, A. Cholaszczyńska, and A. B. Reske-Kunz, “The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast augments the Th17-promoting capability of dendritic cells by enhancing IL-23 production, and impairs their T cell stimulatory activity due to elevated IL-10,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 35, pp. 174–184, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Zal, A. Volkmann, and B. Stockinger, “Mechanisms of tolerance induction in major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T cells specific for a blood-borne self-antigen,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 2089–2099, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Bros, F. Jährling, A. Renzing et al., “A newly established murine immature dendritic cell line can be differentiated into a mature state, but exerts tolerogenic function upon maturation in the presence of glucocorticoid,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3820–3829, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Oelze, A. Daiber, R. P. Brandes et al., “Nebivolol inhibits superoxide formation by NADPH oxidase and endothelial dysfunction in angiotensin II-treated rats,” Hypertension, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 677–684, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Mollnau, E. Schulz, A. Daiber et al., “Nebivolol prevents vascular NOS III uncoupling in experimental hyperlipidemia and inhibits NADPH oxidase activity in inflammatory cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 615–621, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Heumüller, S. Wind, E. Barbosa-Sicard et al., “Apocynin is not an inhibitor of vascular NADPH oxidases but an antioxidant,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. P. Brandes, N. Weissmann, and K. Schröder, “Nox family NADPH oxidases: molecular mechanisms of activation,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 76, pp. 208–226, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. D. Lambeth and A. S. Neish, “Nox enzymes and new thinking on reactive oxygen: a double-edged sword revisited,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 9, pp. 119–145, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Cachat, C. Deffert, S. Hugues, and K.-H. Krause, “Phagocyte NADPH oxidase and specific immunity,” Clinical Science, vol. 128, no. 10, pp. 635–648, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Kotsias, E. Hoffmann, S. Amigorena, and A. Savina, “Reactive oxygen species production in the phagosome: impact on antigen presentation in dendritic cells,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 714–729, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. M. van den Berg, E. van Koppen, A. Åhlin et al., “Chronic granulomatous disease: the European experience,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e5234, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. S. De Ravin, N. Naumann, E. W. Cowen et al., “Chronic granulomatous disease as a risk factor for autoimmune disease,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 1097–1103, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Wahren-Herlenius and T. Dörner, “Immunopathogenic mechanisms of systemic autoimmune disease,” The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9894, pp. 819–831, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. M. Campbell, M. Kashgarian, and M. J. Shlomchik, “NADPH oxidase inhibits the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 157, Article ID 3004801, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K.-C. Sheng, G. A. Pietersz, C. K. Tang, P. A. Ramsland, and V. Apostolopoulos, “Reactive oxygen species level defines two functionally distinctive stages of inflammatory dendritic cell development from mouse bone marrow,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 2863–2872, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. Yan, W. Chen, and L. Huang, “Reactive oxygen species play a central role in the activity of cationic liposome based cancer vaccine,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Mortaz, A. D. Kraneveld, J. J. Smit et al., “Effect of cigarette smoke extract on dendritic cells and their impact on T-cell proliferation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID e4946, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Matsue, D. Edelbaum, D. Shalhevet et al., “Generation and function of reactive oxygen species in dendritic cells during antigen presentation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 3010–3018, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Daiber, M.-H. Zou, M. Bachschmid, and V. Ullrich, “Ebselen as a peroxynitrite scavenger in vitro and ex vivo,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Yamada, T. Arai, N. Endo et al., “LPS-induced ROS generation and changes in glutathione level and their relation to the maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 926–933, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. Requejo-Aguilar, I. Lopez-Fabuel, E. Fernandez, L. M. Martins, A. Almeida, and J. P. Bolaños, “Pink1 deficiency sustains cell proliferation by reprogramming glucose metabolism through HIF1,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, article 4514, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. U. Fearon, M. Canavan, M. Biniecka, and D. J. Veale, “Hypoxia, mitochondrial dysfunction and synovial invasiveness in rheumatoid arthritis,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 385–397, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Vulcano, S. Dusi, D. Lissandrini et al., “Toll receptor-mediated regulation of NADPH oxidase in human dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 9, pp. 5749–5756, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. A. Winkelstein, M. C. Marino, R. B. Johnston Jr. et al., “Chronic granulomatous disease. Report on a national registry of 368 patients,” Medicine, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 155–169, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Steven, M. Hausding, S. Kröller-Schön et al., “Gliptin and GLP‐1 analog treatment improves survival and vascular inflammation/dysfunction in animals with lipopolysaccharide‐induced endotoxemia,” Basic Research in Cardiology, vol. 110, no. 6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Kröller-Schön, M. Knorr, M. Hausding et al., “Glucose-independent improvement of vascular dysfunction in experimental sepsis by dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibition,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 140–149, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Karbach, A. L. Croxford, M. Oelze et al., “Interleukin 17 drives vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial hypertension in psoriasis-like skin disease,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2658–2668, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Karbach, P. Wenzel, A. Waisman, T. Münzel, and A. Daiber, “eNOS uncoupling in cardiovascular diseases-the role of oxidative stress and inflammation,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 3579–3594, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Mittal, M. R. Siddiqui, K. Tran, S. P. Reddy, and A. B. Malik, “Reactive oxygen species in inflammation and tissue injury,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1126–1167, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Z. V. Varga, Z. Giricz, L. Liaudet, G. Haskó, P. Ferdinandy, and P. Pacher, “Interplay of oxidative, nitrosative/nitrative stress, inflammation, cell death and autophagy in diabetic cardiomyopathy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1852, no. 2, pp. 232–242, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. Aviello and U. G. Knaus, “ROS in gastrointestinal inflammation: rescue or sabotage?” British Journal of Pharmacology, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. Zhou, A. S. Yazdi, P. Menu, and J. Tschopp, “A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation,” Nature, vol. 469, no. 7329, pp. 221–225, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. H.-W. Clement, J. F. Vazquez, O. Sommer et al., “Lipopolysaccharide-induced radical formation in the striatum is abolished in Nox2 gp91phox-deficient mice,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. V. Ben-Shaul, L. Lomnitski, A. Nyska, Y. Zurovsky, M. Bergman, and S. Grossman, “The effect of natural antioxidants, NAO and apocynin, on oxidative stress in the rat heart following LPS challenge,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. Zhou, D.-Y. Hu, L.-M. Liu, and X.-W. Zhou, “Protective effects of apocynin on ‘two-hit’ injury induced by hemorrhagic shock and lipopolysaccharide,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1023–1028, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  57. S. Balkow, K. Loser, M. Krummen et al., “Dendritic cell activation by combined exposure to anti-CD40 plus interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 efficiently stimulates anti-tumor immunity,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 78–87, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Judith Stein et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.