Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2063179, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2063179
Review Article

Role of Oxidative Stress as Key Regulator of Muscle Wasting during Cachexia

1Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
2Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Santiago, Chile
3Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas & Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
4Laboratory of Nanomedicine and Targeted Delivery, Center for Integrative Medicine and Innovative Science, Faculty of Medicine, and Center for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
5Center for the Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (CEDENNA), Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
6Departamento de Gastroenterología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
7Departamento de Ciencias Químicas y Biológicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago, Chile
8Centro Integrativo de Biología y Química Aplicada, Universidad Bernardo O’Higgins, Santiago, Chile

Correspondence should be addressed to Claudio Cabello-Verrugio; lc.banu@ollebac.oidualc

Received 11 November 2017; Accepted 7 February 2018; Published 28 March 2018

Academic Editor: Rodrigo Franco

Copyright © 2018 Johanna Ábrigo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle atrophy is a pathological condition mainly characterized by a loss of muscular mass and the contractile capacity of the skeletal muscle as a consequence of muscular weakness and decreased force generation. Cachexia is defined as a pathological condition secondary to illness characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass with or without loss of fat mass and with concomitant diminution of muscle strength. The molecular mechanisms involved in cachexia include oxidative stress, protein synthesis/degradation imbalance, autophagy deregulation, increased myonuclear apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Oxidative stress is one of the most common mechanisms of cachexia caused by different factors. It results in increased ROS levels, increased oxidation-dependent protein modification, and decreased antioxidant system functions. In this review, we will describe the importance of oxidative stress in skeletal muscles, its sources, and how it can regulate protein synthesis/degradation imbalance, autophagy deregulation, increased myonuclear apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction involved in cachexia.

1. Introduction

Skeletal muscle atrophy is a pathological condition mainly characterized by a loss of muscular mass and the contractile capacity of skeletal muscle that produces muscular weakness and decreased force generation [16]. This pathological condition affects a large number of individuals and can be generated by several causes, including pathologic status and aging. Among the main causes are disuse, a state that can be produced by prolonged rest, immobilization, or hind-limb unloading [79]; denervation, which is characterized by alterations in neuromuscular connections produced under clinical conditions, such as trauma, diabetic neuropathy, degenerative disease, and spinal cord injury [1016]; sepsis, an inflammatory syndrome produced mainly by bacterial infections [1721]; sarcopenia, a physiological process of aging that decreases mobility and aggravates inflammatory diseases and other age-related diseases [2228]; and chronic diseases that cause collateral damage in muscles by producing atrophic conditions termed cachexia [2938], which will be the focus of this review.

2. Cachexia

Cachexia is defined as a pathological condition that is secondary to illness and characterized by the progressive loss of muscle mass with or without loss of fat mass [39]. Cachexia typically manifests in patients with chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic liver disease (CLD), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [40], which affect the quality of life and survival of patients [41]. In addition to chronic illness, cachexia is associated with diseases that cause inflammation such as AIDS and sepsis [42]. The prevalence of cachexia is 1% of the total patient population, and it is severely increased among cancer (50–80%), AIDS (10–35%), CHF (5–15%), CKD (30–60%), and COPD (27–35%) patients [4244].

Even though different types of diseases can induce cachexia, one important common feature of these conditions is alteration of the plasma levels of several soluble factors (termed “atrophic factors”), such as angiotensin II (Ang-II), transforming growth factor type beta (TGF-β), myostatin, glucocorticoids, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin 1 and 6 (IL-1 and IL-6) [4554] (Figure 1). These molecules can modulate the different mechanisms involved in the loss of mass and function of skeletal muscle [3, 46, 48, 49, 53, 5559].

Figure 1: Oxidative stress in muscle is produced by an imbalance between oxidant and antioxidant species. Soluble atrophic factors produced by different diseases induce an imbalance of the oxidative state, increasing oxidant species such as O2·, H2O2, and OH· and decreasing antioxidant species such as catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). This imbalance is denominated as “oxidative stress” and produces oxidative damage in lipids, DNA, and proteins, impairing functionality of proteins and cellular structures.
2.1. Mechanisms Involved in the Generation and Development of Cachexia

One of the main features of cachexia is the diminution of muscle strength. There are several molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in cachexia that can explain this phenomenon: (i) oxidative stress, (ii) protein synthesis/degradation imbalance, (iii) autophagy deregulation, (iv) increased myonuclear apoptosis, and (v) mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Molecular mechanisms involved in cachexia are modulated by oxidative stress. Atrophic factors can generate oxidative stress in skeletal muscle by the activation of different sources of reactive oxygen species, such as the mitochondria, xanthine oxidase (XO), and NADPH oxidase complex with Nox subunit, in addition to the decrease in antioxidant species. Oxidative stress is able to produce mitochondrial dysfunction, increase ubiquitin proteasome system activity, increase myonuclear apoptosis, decrease the protein synthesis pathway, and deregulate autophagy, all of which are involved in cachexia-skeletal muscle atrophy.

Oxidative stress is one of the most common mechanisms of different causes of cachexia, and two important characteristics of muscle in cachectic patients are increased ROS levels and oxidation-dependent protein modifications [6062]. Additionally, oxidative stress can modulate other mechanisms involved in cachexia. In the following sections, we will describe the generation of oxidative stress, how oxidative stress regulates the aforementioned molecular mechanisms, and their roles in cachexia.

3. Oxidative Stress

Skeletal muscle is a tissue that continuously produces oxidant species such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (for details about RNS, see [63]), which are in balance with antioxidant mechanisms. The production of ROS species is a normal process in all cells (including skeletal muscle cells) in which signaling molecules regulate different pathways essential for cell viability [64, 65]. Skeletal muscle cells produce several types of ROS that differ in terms of origin, localization, stability, and reactivity [66]. The role of ROS in muscle can seem contradictory since they can act as signaling molecules in normal processes such as regeneration and repair [67] and promote mitochondrial biogenesis during exercise [68], but local sustained ROS levels may cause tissue injury due to oxidative damage [69].

The imbalance produced by an increase in oxidant species levels and/or a decrease in antioxidant species generates the loss of normal redox equilibrium in cells, a condition denominated as oxidative stress, which corresponds to redox status; can injure several cellular organelles, proteins, lipids, and membranes; and affects muscle function [70] (Figure 1).

The main features of oxidant and antioxidant species will be described in the following sections, and we will principally describe their participation and contribution to the generation of cachexia in patients with chronic diseases.

3.1. Types and Features of ROS

Superoxide anion (O2·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (OH·) are the main ROS found in most tissues [64]. Several studies suggest that the major ROS produced in skeletal muscle fibers is O2· [71, 72], which is very labile and undergoes enzymatic or spontaneous dismutation by reduction to more stable species, such as H2O2. H2O2 is a nonradical weak oxidant with a relatively long half-life that can diffuse across cell membranes and therefore acts as an important intracellular signaling molecule [73, 74]. Additionally, H2O2 can generate OH· in the presence of active free iron ions or other transition metals, a process known as the Fenton reaction. OH· reacts immediately with any surrounding biomolecules, resulting in most of the deleterious effects associated with oxidative stress. In this context, considering that skeletal muscle contains 10–15% of total body iron—mainly in myoglobin and mitochondria—it could be especially sensitive to alterations due to oxidative stress. Thus, iron homeostasis can be considered a comodulator of ROS signaling and effects [75].

The main cellular macromolecules can be damaged by ROS. Cellular membranes can be damaged by the changes that produce OH· on lipids by attacking polyunsaturated fatty acid lipid residues and generating peroxyl radical [76]. DNA is affected because purine and pyrimidine bases and deoxyribose are damaged by OH [76]. OH· targets proteins by damaging their amino acid residues, such as lysine, arginine, histidine, proline, and threonine, causing the formation of protein carbonyls. In addition, the sulfhydryl group in amino acids undergoes irreversible oxidation [76].

3.2. Sources of ROS in Skeletal Muscle Cells

ROS in cells can be produced by different sources, such as mitochondria, sarcoplasmic reticulum, and sarcolemma. Additionally, the main enzymes involved in ROS generation under physiopathological conditions are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase and xanthine oxidase (XO) (Figure 2).

The Nox protein family is composed of subunits of the NADPH oxidase enzyme complex that have catalytic and electron-transporting functions [77]. The Nox family consists of seven members, Nox1–5 and two dual oxidases (Duox), Duox1 and Duox2 [78]. Structurally, Nox isoforms contain FAD and NADPH binding sites, two heme molecules, and six transmembrane alpha helices with cytosolic N- and C-termini [78, 79]. Several proteins can interact with Nox isoforms. For example, Nox1–4 can bind to p22phox, while Nox1–2 can bind to small GTPases such as Rac. Nox2 can bind to p47phox and p67phox as well as the cytosolic protein p40phox [78, 80]. Nox4 has been reported to bind to the polymerase (DNA-directed) delta-interacting protein 2 (PolDip2) [81]. NADPH oxidases are enzymes that serve a primary function in the production of superoxide/ROS. Nox1, Nox2, and Nox5 mainly produce O2·, while Nox4 mainly produces H2O2 [82, 83]. Nox4 is constitutively active, and modulation of its expression may thus be a major activity regulator, whereas Nox1 can be activated by Nox activator 1 (NOXA1) protein, Nox2 can be activated by p67phox, and Nox5 can be activated by calmodulin [78, 79].

In skeletal muscle, the NADPH oxidase complex is reportedly located on transverse tubules (T-tubules), the sarcolemma, and the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In addition, skeletal muscle expresses only the Nox2 and Nox4 isoforms and partner proteins such as p22phox, p67phox, p47phox, and p40phox [84, 85]. Interestingly, O2· generated from Nox has been implicated in progressive skeletal muscle damage [86]. Recent evidence demonstrated that NADPH oxidase overactivity leads to atrophy of glycolytic muscle in a rat model of heart failure (HF) [87]. Interestingly, the mechanism also involved the NF-κB activation and increased p38 phosphorylation and was reduced by aerobic exercise training, suggesting that NADPH oxidase activity can be a good candidate for targeting and treating the muscle wasting [87].

Xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH), the most common form of xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) in tissue, can be converted to xanthine oxidase (XO) via oxidation of sulfhydryl residues or proteolysis [88]. XO is an enzyme belonging to the molybdenum protein family with a homodimer structure and a molecule mass of 290 kDa. It contains two separate substrate-binding sites [88]. Functionally, XO causes oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and then to uric acid [89, 90]. During reoxidation of XO, O2 acts as an electron acceptor, producing superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide [91]. During these reactions, O2· and H2O2 are formed [91]. Spontaneously or under the influence of enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD), O2· are transformed into H2O2 and O2 [88]. The conversion of XDH to XO is assumed to be required for radical generation and tissue injury, although some evidence suggests that XDH directly participates in O2· generation in ischemic tissue [92, 93]. In this context, it has been proposed that ischemia induces conversion of XDH into XO as well as production of hypoxanthine, which reacts with O2 during reperfusion and generates a high amount of superoxide radical from XO [94]. Early studies have suggested that ROS arising from XO plays an important role in the inflammatory response to physical eccentric contractions or high-intensity or long-lasting exercise as well as in injuries caused by ischemia-reperfusion processes [95, 96]. These studies are in agreement with those reporting the role of XO in muscle injury associated with exhaustive physical exercise [9799]. In skeletal muscle, XO is localized mainly in the vascular endothelium [100]. The intake of enzyme inhibitors diminishes the release of O2· in the vessels of contracting muscles, which has proven to be effective for reducing muscle fatigue in vivo [101, 102]. Another study shows that suppression of XO activity by allopurinol may increase maximum isometric strength in the skeletal muscle of old mice [103]. In addition, administration of allopurinol and subsequent XO inhibition prevent muscular atrophy by inhibiting the p38 MAPK-atrogin-1 pathway and may have beneficial clinical effects, such as resistance against muscular atrophy in patients with permanent immobilization, sarcopenia, or cachexia [104, 105].

A third component that produces ROS in skeletal muscle is mitochondria. Skeletal muscle is a tissue that constantly demands ATP for energy production. ATP is generated via the activity of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) mainly at two sites: (i) complex I, where it is generated by auto-oxidation of the flavin mononucleotide from the NADH-dehydrogenase, and (ii) complex III, where its generation depends on auto-oxidation of unstable semiquinone, which is an intermediate of the Q-cycle reaction [106]. The ETC is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane. In this membrane, oxygen is consumed, resulting in the liberation of electrons that can quickly react with cellular proteins, resulting in their oxidation, or with molecules such as H2O or H2O2, generating more reactive molecules. Additionally, about 1–3% of the total oxygen utilized by the mitochondria is incompletely reduced and remains as ROS [107]. Compared with other tissues, skeletal muscle has a high number of mitochondria, and therefore, the contribution of this organelle to oxidative stress is very relevant.

3.3. Antioxidant Species in Skeletal Muscle

It is well known that skeletal muscle features high metabolic activity and oxidative capacity. Considering the importance of ROS production in skeletal muscle, the antioxidant system is essential for maintenance of cellular oxidative homeostasis. There are several antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) [108]. SOD has three isoforms: SOD1, which is located in the intracellular cytoplasmic compartment; SOD2, which is found in mitochondria; and SOD3, which is located in the extracellular matrix. This enzyme is a specific antioxidant for O2· and catalyzes the dismutation of O2· to H2O2 [108]. Some studies have indicated that mice lacking SOD1 lose muscle mass, suggesting that it plays a role in the maintenance of muscle fibers [109]. Catalase is present in cytoplasmic compartments and in mitochondria [110]. It catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to H2O and O2 [111]. The enzymatic activity of catalase is higher in oxidative myofibers than in fast glycolytic fibers [112]. As an ROS scavenger, GPx has the same function, but with higher affinity for H2O2 than for catalase [108].

Five GPx isoforms have been described in mammals with different cellular localizations and substrate specificities. GPx1 is localized predominantly in the cytosol and somewhat in the mitochondrial matrix. GPx3 is present in the extracellular space [113]. GPx4 is a membrane-associated enzyme that is partly localized in the mitochondrial intermembrane space.

Studies have indicated that a decrease in antioxidant levels in response to diseases can lead to an imbalance in the redox state of the cell, causing oxidative damage [66, 114, 115] (Figure 1).

3.4. Oxidative Stress in Cachexia

Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) develop cachexia associated with their pathologic status [116118]. One of the main participants in this phenomenon is Ang-II, an endogenous peptide with atrophic activity in skeletal muscle. Patients with CHF and CKD have increased levels of circulating Ang-II [119121]. Interestingly, Ang-II induces ROS production in skeletal muscle cells through its AT-1 receptor, as demonstrated by a study that found that losartan, an AT-1 receptor blocker, eliminates the oxidative effect of Ang-II [122]. Additionally, the atrophic effects mediated by Ang-II depend on ROS [123, 124]. In this context, Zhao et al. [125] and Cabello-Verrugio et al. [126] demonstrated that rats and mice infused with Ang-II have high ROS levels in skeletal muscle as well as major expression of gp91phox, a Nox subunit, suggesting that Nox increases ROS levels. Similar results were obtained in muscle cells incubated with Ang-II (i.e., they exhibited enhanced Nox activity) [124]. Moreover, the use of apocynin, a Nox inhibitor, blocks ROS production, suggesting that Ang-II increases ROS levels in skeletal muscle via a Nox-dependent mechanism [122]. Further, Ang-II promotes membrane mitochondrial depolarization, which increases mitochondrial ROS production, therefore contributing to oxidative stress in skeletal muscle [127]. Together, these results indicate that, in the presence of high levels of Ang-II, ROS is an important factor in the development of muscle atrophy in cachectic patients with chronic disease.

Patients with cancer cachexia have exhibited protein oxidation in skeletal muscle, suggesting the involvement of oxidative stress in cachexia [128]. In particular, patients with cancer present elevated ROS levels and decreased antioxidant levels in serum [66, 129]. They also have increased levels of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins (UCP) such as UCP2 and UCP3, which could lead to uncoupling of ETC and thus to the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, increasing ROS production in mitochondria [130133]. Additionally, cancer increases the levels of several proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of cachexia and oxidative damage, such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α [134137]. TNF-α induces ROS production by mitochondria and Nox activation [106, 138, 139]. Sullivan-Gunn et al. demonstrated that the expression of the Nox enzyme subunits Nox2, p40phox, and p67phox was decreased in the muscle of mice with cancer cachexia, in spite of increased superoxide levels. However, these mice also exhibited decreased levels of antioxidant proteins such as SOD1, SOD2, and GPx [140], as reported previously [66, 141]. These results suggest that the development of oxidative stress in association with cancer-induced cachexia can be attributed, at least partially, to increased ROS levels and failure of the antioxidant systems that operate in muscle cells. Other evidence has indicated that inhibition of XO reduces skeletal muscle wasting and improves outcomes in a rat model of cancer cachexia, suggesting that other sources may contribute to oxidative stress [142].

4. Redox Regulation of Molecular Mechanisms of Cachexia

4.1. Imbalance in the Protein Synthesis/Degradation

All types of skeletal muscle atrophy are associated with a decrease in the levels of myofibrillar proteins, mainly myosin heavy chain, myosin light chain, and troponin, which are essential parts of the sarcomere structure [7, 39, 143]. The myosin proteins form a complex with actin and are responsible for muscle contraction [6]. In cachectic conditions, there is an imbalance in the degradation and/or synthesis of myofibrillar proteins, explaining their decreased levels. Under muscle atrophy conditions such as cachexia, the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) and calpains are the main mechanisms involved in the degradation of muscle proteins [144].

4.1.1. The Ubiquitin Proteasome System

The UPS acts by the coordinated action of three enzymes: E1 (enzyme activator of ubiquitin), E2 (enzyme conjugator of ubiquitin), and E3 (ubiquitin ligase). All are involved in the labeling of specific proteins with ubiquitin (Ub) molecules. Ubiquitinated proteins are then degraded by proteasome 26S subunits [145]. E3 ubiquitin ligases are a family of enzymes that determine which protein will be ubiquitinated and degraded [1, 145]. In cachectic skeletal muscle, the levels of two E3 ubiquitin ligases are increased: MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF-1. These muscle-specific enzymes target myofibrillar proteins, such as myosin, and factors involved in myogenesis, such as MyoD [145, 146]. Interestingly, our research and that of others have demonstrated that UPS is overactivated by soluble factors such as Ang-II and TGF-β1, which are increased during cachexia [45, 46, 48, 49, 147, 148].

UPS is the principal proteolytic mechanism described in skeletal muscle atrophy associated with chronic diseases. In pathological conditions, this pathway can be overactivated in multiple ways, including oxidative stress. Li et al. studied the effect of H2O2 on UPS markers in myotubes, showing that ubiquitin-conjugating activity is stimulated concomitant with an increase in the expression of E2 and E3 enzymes [149]. Additionally, a study by Russell et al. employing a murine model of cancer cachexia indicated that ubiquitin gene expression increases downstream Nox-generated ROS production, suggesting that Nox plays a role in cancer cachexia [124, 150] (Figure 2).

In chronic diseases, systemic increase of ROS can promote oxidative stress and alterations in peripheral tissues such as skeletal muscle, increasing the levels of proinflammatory transcription factors, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), that regulate specific UPS genes [60, 124]. In skeletal muscle, NF-κB is activated and translocated to the nucleus to induce MuRF-1 expression [151]. Additionally, NF-κB increases the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, two important soluble factors involved in the development of skeletal muscle atrophy that increases ROS production and activate UPS, forming a positive feedback mechanism [50, 151153].

These results indicate that, in skeletal muscle, ROS upregulates the expression of key components of UPS and increases their activity and that Nox participates in this phenomenon.

4.1.2. Calpains

Calpains are Ca2+-activated proteases coded by 15 genes in humans that are involved in the selective cleavage of target proteins [154]. In skeletal muscle, calpain 1 (μ-calpain) and calpain 2 (m-calpain) participate in skeletal muscle atrophy [155]. Specifically, active calpains are able to cleave cytoskeletal proteins such as titin and nebulin, which are responsible for anchoring contractile proteins, as well as several kinases, phosphatases, and oxidized contractile proteins, such as actin and myosin [155, 156]. There is evidence that oxidative stress increases the expression of calpains in murine and human skeletal muscle cells [157, 158].

Studies have found that oxidative stress increases calpain activity in skeletal muscle cells [157, 158]. Specifically, H2O2 is able to increase calpain 1 activity in murine skeletal muscle cells and induce activation of calpain 1 and calpain 2 in human skeletal muscle cells [157, 158]. In line with these findings, antioxidant treatment of disused skeletal muscle has been found to prevent both oxidative stress and calpain 1 activation [159]. Together, these investigations confirm that oxidative stress in skeletal muscle can activate calpain.

The main regulators of calpain activity are cytosolic calcium and calpastatin, an endogenous calpain inhibitor [155, 160]. Thus, increased oxidative stress-dependent calpain activity is likely due to an increase in the cytosolic level of free calcium, which also depends on oxidative stress [158, 161, 162].

4.1.3. Anabolic Pathways

Despite the fact that increased catabolism in skeletal muscle is the principal mechanism involved in the imbalance of protein content, reduced anabolism also contributes to this phenomenon. Induction of protein synthesis is determined by the Akt/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway and depends on insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGFR), which can be activated by different factors, such as amino acids, insulin, and IGF-1. After IGFR binds to IGF-1, it is phosphorylated and activated, inducing activation of PI3K, which phosphorylates Akt and, consequently, mTOR, promoting protein synthesis [163]. Additionally, there is evidence that IGF-1 inhibits proteolysis in skeletal muscle by avoiding overactivation of UPS, suggesting regulation of both processes [164166]. Previous reports have indicated that the circulating level of IGF-1 is reduced in patients with pathological conditions such as sepsis, cancer, and liver diseases [167169]. Furthermore, soluble factors such as TNF-α and Ang-II act upstream of the IGF-1 pathway, inhibiting PI3K-Akt signaling and the downstream pathway. An example of this regulation involves the Forkhead box O (FoxO), a transcription factor normally phosphorylated by active PI3K-Akt/PKB that is kept inactive in the cytoplasm. When the synthesis pathway for TNF-α and Ang-II is inhibited, FoxO translocates to the nucleus and induces expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligases MAFbx/atrogin 1 and MuRF-1, increasing protein degradation [170].

Several factors, including ROS, are involved in the regulation of the PI3K-Akt pathway. Low ROS levels induce activation of the anabolic pathway, while high ROS levels inhibit it [171, 172] (Figure 2). Previous studies have established that Akt is a redox-sensitive protein that is activated in the presence of excess H2O2; however, this effect can be a consequence of indirect mechanisms such as oxidative inactivation of phosphatases or loss of feedback inhibition via MAPKs [173]. Increased ROS levels can induce protein oxidation in specific cysteine residues, inhibiting the activity of phosphorylases such as PKA that induce the activation of Akt [174]. The use of antioxidants such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) after oxidative stress stimulus prevents ROS increases and avoids inhibition of Akt activity [175], indicating that oxidation plays a role in this phenomenon. Additionally, inhibition of two important ROS sources, Nox and the mitochondrial ETC, activates Akt [175]. In skeletal muscle, ROS can be involved in the activation of metabolic effects by other signaling pathways independent of insulin, stimulating, for example, glucose transport during exercise, specifically during muscle contraction [176, 177].

4.2. Deregulation of Autophagy

The autophagy-lysosomal pathway is a normal mechanism that maintains cell homeostasis by removing old and damaged cellular components. This process eliminates portions of the cytoplasm, organelles, and protein aggregates in double-membrane vesicles, called autophagosomes, which are then fused with lysosomes for degradation [178]. Autophagy is often described as a five-step process: (1) induction, (2) expansion, (3) elongation and completion of autophagosomes, (4) fusion with lysosomes, and (5) degradation of proteins and organelles [63, 179]. Autophagy is induced by the formation of the pre-autophagosome structure, which occurs by activation of the ULK1 complex [179]. One of the main negative regulators of this step is mTORC1, and consequently all factors that prevent mTORC1 activation can promote autophagy [179]. The stage of expansion is characterized by the formation of phagophore, a fractional autophagosome membrane, and the recruitment of several Atg proteins, including the essential Atg6 (also called beclin-1) [179]. The elongation and completion of autophagosomes involve Atg genes (e.g., Atg5, Atg7, Atg8, and Atg12) [179]. During this stage, LC3B protein (Atg8) is posttranslationally modified from its inactive form (LC3I) to its active form (LC3II), which is a component of autophagosomes [180, 181]. Next, the autophagosome is fused with a lysosome, and the autophagosome’s contents (i.e., cytosolic proteins and organelles) are transferred to lysosomal proteases (i.e., cathepsins B, D, and L) [179]. The fifth and final step of autophagy involves cathepsin-mediated degradation of proteins and organelles (i.e., the cargo) contained within the autophagosome [179181].

Under pathological conditions, autophagy increases in association with muscle wasting induced by proatrophic stimuli, fasting, high-fat diet/insulin resistance, hypoxia, and exercise [182]. In addition, impaired autophagy has been reported in several myopathies [183185]. Interestingly, a bidirectional relation between autophagy and oxidative stress has been reported, with some studies finding an increase in autophagy induced by ROS and other studies finding an increase in ROS induced by autophagy [182].

It has been demonstrated that, in patients with COPD, locomotor muscles feature increased autophagy [186, 187]. Recently, a study employing a murine model of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and perforation showed that limb muscles exhibit higher autophagy than do respiratory muscles [188]. Another recent study using an experimental model of CKD revealed a correlation between skeletal muscle oxidative stress, muscle catabolism, and autophagy, finding that inhibition of oxidative stress could improve muscle atrophy by enhancing mitophagy [189]. Moreover, a C26 cell-induced cancer model demonstrated that exercise increased autophagy flux, improving muscle homeostasis, probably due to the removal of damaged proteins and mitochondria [190].

Several studies have suggested that autophagy is activated by oxidative stress, but a study of expression of a mutant form of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1G93A) in skeletal muscle revealed a causal relation between oxidative stress, activation of autophagy, and muscle atrophy and weakness [191194]. Although the mechanisms involved in the regulation of autophagy by ROS during skeletal muscle wasting are not yet known, studies have suggested that several signaling pathways participate in this regulation. Thus, it has been suggested that ROS can induce autophagy by regulating the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway. A model of muscle atrophy by disuse demonstrated that ROS can inhibit Akt/mTOR signaling and consequently induce autophagy [195]. However, a skeletal muscle model employing dystrophic mdx mice revealed that Nox2-derived ROS can activate the Src/PI3K/Akt pathway and, subsequently, mTORC1, leading to autophagy inhibition [183].

Inactivation of PTEN (a phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10) results in increased cellular PIP3 levels, activation of PI3K/Akt, and subsequent activation of autophagy [182]. One inhibitor of PTEN is oxidative stress [196, 197]. PTEN can also regulate ROS production, resulting in a feedback loop in which it has been suggested that Nox participates in [197]. While ROS has been shown to activate Akt through inhibition of PTEN in C2C12 myotubules, its role in regulating autophagy in skeletal muscle has not been directly assessed [196].

ROS-dependent regulation of autophagy may also occur through p38 MAPK. In skeletal muscle, the participation of p38 MAPK in autophagy was found in a model of muscle atrophy induced by sepsis [17]. The same model was used to demonstrate the involvement of ROS in p38 MAPK regulation of autophagy [198]. In other tissues, the p38 MAPK/p53 pathway has been shown to activate autophagy, but this pathway has not yet been evaluated in skeletal muscle [199, 200].

AMPK, a widely investigated indicator of cellular energy levels and regulator of muscle metabolism during exercise, may be another possible mechanism for redox regulation of autophagy in association with skeletal muscle wasting [201]. Alterations in redox balance have been shown to regulate AMPK activity [202]. Moreover, a study using C2C12 cells showed that, during nutrient deprivation and rapamycin treatment, there is an increase in mitochondria-derived ROS, which promotes skeletal muscle autophagy, and this effect is mediated in part by activation of AMPK and inhibition of Akt [194].

4.3. Myonuclear Apoptosis

Apoptosis is defined as programmed cell death. In skeletal muscle, this process is called myonuclear apoptosis and has distinctive characteristics compared to apoptosis of other tissues because muscle fibers are multinucleated cells. Myonuclear apoptosis involves elimination of the fiber segments that surround the apoptotic nucleus (known as the myonuclear domain), not the complete fiber [203205].

The mechanisms involved in the generation of apoptotic nuclei have not been clearly elucidated. However, two principal signaling pathways are involved in apoptosis: extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. The extrinsic pathway is mediated by factors of the TNF family or Ang-II, which activate death receptors and induce activation of pro-caspase 8 by proteolytic cleavage. The intrinsic pathway is dependent on mitochondria and triggers an imbalance between antiapoptotic factors such as Bcl-2 (diminished) and apoptotic factors such as Bax (elevated) that might induce cytochrome c release and promote the formation of the mitochondrial transitory pore. Then, cytochrome c binds to apoptosis protease-activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) and pro-caspase 9 in the cytoplasm to form an apoptosome complex, which induces activation of caspase 9 (initiator caspase) [206]. Both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways converge in the activation of effectors such as caspase 3. Caspase 3 activates endonuclease G, which triggers DNA fragmentation, degradation of genetic material by proteases, and posterior formation of apoptotic bodies eliminated by phagocytic cells.

Myonuclear apoptosis is increased in pathologies such as COPD, CHF, CKD, and obesity [38, 207210]. Our group and others have found that cachectic muscle induced by Ang-II develops myonuclear apoptosis and that this is one of the main factors involved in overactivation of myonuclear apoptosis and the consequent increase in muscle weakness [45, 118, 211213].

In other cell types, oxidative stress has been described as a potent inducer of cell death [214]. In an experimental model of cancer cachexia in which an XO inhibitor was used to reduce caspase-3 activity, Springer et al. showed that ROS production and proteasome activity decrease in skeletal muscle and consequently prevent body weight loss in animals [142]. Additionally, the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is activated by a direct or indirect effect of ROS because increasing ROS can induce expression and mitochondrial translocation of the proapoptotic factor Bax, in turn inducing formation of the mitochondrial transition pore. Patients with cancer or CHF often present with hyperuricemia (incremented levels of uric acid), a condition in which XO activity is upregulated in the affected tissue and the systemic ROS level is increased [215]. Recently, studies employing a murine model of obesity induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) have shown that muscle weakness and protein degradation are accompanied by increased ROS levels and myonuclear apoptotic markers in muscle fibers [216].

4.4. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondria play a key role in muscle physiology and metabolism. As mentioned throughout this review, mitochondria are the main producers of ATP and one of the main sources of ROS. However, other signaling intermediates such as calcium, NAD+/NADH, acetyl-CoA, and alpha-ketoglutarate are also produced/released to control muscle metabolism and epigenetics [217219]. Mitochondrial function depends on the success of the mitochondrial life cycle, which involves mitochondrial biogenesis, remodeling through mitochondrial fusion and fission events called mitochondrial dynamics (MtDy), and degradation through a process called selective mitochondrial autophagy or mitophagy [220223]. Any disruption of the mitochondrial life cycle will lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, which is characterized by low ATP levels and/or high ROS production [224, 225].

Superoxide (O2·) is a byproduct of the ETC that can be converted to H2O2 by SOD2. As previously mentioned, O2− and H2O2, which are both abundant in mitochondria, generate OH· (hydroxyl radical), which is the most reactive and harmful reactive radical for mitochondrial function. ROS will not only oxidize the respiratory complexes of ETC and mitochondrial DNA, among other macromolecules, but will also increase ROS production by damaged mitochondria, leading to a vicious cycle that ends in cell death due to apoptosis and/or necrosis [226, 227].

In addition to the antioxidant mechanisms previously described in this manuscript, mitochondria have more complex defense systems, including triple A proteases and mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR), which protect against cytotoxic protein aggregates and misfolded proteins, and the mitochondrial life cycle itself, which acts as a quality control system to eliminate old, dysfunctional, and depolarized mitochondria through mitophagy [225, 228231].

The mitochondrial life cycle and defense systems are both defective in cachectic conditions, negatively impacting mitochondrial function. As previously reported, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial dynamics, and mitophagy are defective in skeletal and cardiac muscle cells with altered mitochondrial content and morphology; disruption of mitochondrial fusion and exacerbation of mitochondrial fission; altered mitophagy; reduced ETC activity; increased ROS generation; and proneness to apoptosis and mPTP opening [232, 233]. At the level of mitochondrial content, there is a reduction in the expression of PGC1-alpha, the master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis; nuclear receptor factor 1 and transcription factor A, both of which control nuclear and mitochondrial gene expression for proper mitochondrial function; and SIRT1, a deacetylase that controls PGC1-alpha activity [232, 233]. At the level of mitochondrial dynamics, expression of the fusion proteins MFN1 and MFN2 reduces, and the level of the FIS1 and DRP1 fission proteins is increased [232, 233]. In addition, mitophagy, defined by expression of the LC3, PARKIN, PINK, and Atg5 markers, increases. However, there are some controversial points about mitophagy, which will be discussed later. Finally, at the level of the ETC, the respiratory complexes cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) and cytochrome bc1 (complex III) and the mobile component of cytochrome c showed reduced expression. A similar result was observed for the enzyme citrate synthase that forms part of Krebs cycle [232, 233].

It has been recently shown that mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial dynamics, and mitophagy are interconnected. This means that there is a perfect balance between the need for mitochondrial dynamics in mitophagy and the need for mitophagy in mitochondrial biogenesis [234239]. Mitophagy is essential for mitochondrial turnover to maintain a healthy mitochondria population, control the amount of cellular ROS, and eliminate damaged and ROS-producing mitochondria. Thus, mitophagy failure is associated with an accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria and decreased mitochondrial biogenesis. Several studies performed in cachectic muscle have reported increased mitophagy indicated by the expression of mitophagy markers [232]. However, other studies have reported reduced mitophagy in patients with cancer cachexia [224]. Given these conflicting findings, it is important to consider mitophagy in terms of flux. Diminished mitophagic flux will cause accumulation of mitophagic markers and damaged mitochondria and decreased mitochondrial biogenesis, generating a pool of dysfunctional mitochondria in accordance with the pathology of cachexia.

5. Conclusions

As mentioned in this review, cachexia is a pathological condition that affects skeletal muscle and leads to weakness and loss of strength and muscle mass. This condition is secondary to other pathologies that affect other tissues and is characterized by the participation of secreted soluble factors that produce an atrophic effect in skeletal muscle.

We know that different mechanisms are involved in the development of skeletal muscle atrophy, such as UPS overactivation, protein synthesis pathway diminution, autophagy deregulation, increased myonuclear apoptosis, and oxidative stress, which are activated depending on the stimuli. In this review, we have shown that, even though each mechanism can act independently and play an important role in muscle weakness, the mechanisms are interconnected. In particular, we emphasized oxidative stress as an atrophic mechanism that affects the other mentioned mechanisms. We highlighted the importance of redox state regulation in muscle cells in order to maintain homeostasis and the deleterious effects produced when this balance is lost. In conclusion, although all these mechanisms can generate harmful effects in muscle through different pathways, oxidative stress modulates all of them and can produce a more harmful effect or accelerate muscle damage. Therefore, reduction or prevention of oxidative imbalance in muscle is of vital importance.

Abbreviations

AIDS:Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AMP:Adenosine monophosphate
AMPK:AMP-activated protein kinase
Ang-II:Angiotensin II
Apaf-1:Apoptotic protease-activating factor-1
AT-1:Angiotensin II receptor type 1
Atg:Autophagy-related gene
ATP:Adenosine triphosphate
CHF:Chronic heart failure
CKD:Chronic kidney disease
CLD:Chronic liver disease
COPD:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
DRP1:Dynamin-related protein
Duox:Dual oxidases
E1:Enzyme activator of ubiquitin
E2:Enzyme conjugator of ubiquitin
E3:Ubiquitin ligase
ETC:Electron transport chain
FAD:Flavin adenine dinucleotide
FIS1:Mitochondrial fission 1 protein
FoxO:Forkhead box O
GPx:Glutathione peroxidase
GTPase:Guanosine triphosphatase
HFD:High-fat diet
H2O2:Hydrogen peroxide
IL-1:Interleukin 1
IL-6:Interleukin 6
IGF-1:Insulin-like growth factor-1
IGFR:Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor
MAFbx:Muscle atrophy F-box
MAPK:Mitogen-activated protein kinases
MFN1:Mitofusin 1
mPTP:Mitochondrial permeability transition pore
MtDy:Mitochondrial dynamics
mtUPR:Mitochondrial unfolded protein response
MuRF-1:Muscle RING finger 1
MyoD:Myogenic differentiation factor
NAC:N-Acetyl cysteine
NADPH:Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NF-κB:Nuclear factor kappa B
NFR1:Nuclear receptor factor 1
Nox:NADPH oxidase subunity
NOXA1:Nox activator 1
O2·:Superoxide anion
OH·:Hydroxyl radical
PGC1-alpha:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha
PI3K:Phosphoinositide 3-kinase
PINK:PTEN-induced putative kinase
PKA:Protein kinase A
PolDip2:Polymerase (DNA-directed) delta-interacting protein 2
PTEN:Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10
RNS:Reactive nitrogen species
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
SIRT1:Sirtuin 1
SOD:Superoxide dismutase
Src:Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase
TFAM:Transcription factor A, mitochondrial
TGF-β:Transforming growth factor type beta
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
UPS:Ubiquitin proteasome system
UCP:Uncoupling proteins
ULK1:Unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase
XDH:Xanthine dehydrogenase
XO:Xanthine oxidase
XOR:Xanthine oxidoreductase.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by research grants from National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT 1161646 to Claudio Cabello-Verrugio, 1161288 to Felipe Simon, 1161438 to Cristian Vilos, and 11171001 to Daniel Cabrera), Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy (P09-016-F to Claudio Cabello-Verrugio, Felipe Simon, Alvaro A. Elorza, and Claudia A. Riedel), Programa de Cooperación Científica Internacional ECOS-CONICYT (C16S02 to Claudio Cabello-Verrugio), UNAB-DI (741-15/N to Claudio Cabello-Verrugio, Felipe Simon, Alvaro A. Elorza, and Claudia A. Riedel), and BASAL Grant CEDENNA (FB0807 to Cristian Vilos). Johanna Ábrigo thanks CONICYT for providing a PhD scholarship (21161353).

References

  1. R. W. Jackman and S. C. Kandarian, “The molecular basis of skeletal muscle atrophy,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 287, no. 4, pp. C834–C843, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Bonaldo and M. Sandri, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy,” Disease Models & Mechanisms, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Fanzani, V. M. Conraads, F. Penna, and W. Martinet, “Molecular and cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle atrophy: an update,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163–179, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. E. Brooks and K. H. Myburgh, “Skeletal muscle wasting with disuse atrophy is multi-dimensional: the response and interaction of myonuclei, satellite cells and signaling pathways,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, p. 99, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. M. Callahan, M. S. Miller, A. P. Sweeny et al., “Muscle disuse alters skeletal muscle contractile function at the molecular and cellular levels in older adult humans in a sex-specific manner,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 592, no. 20, pp. 4555–4573, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. S. Miller, D. M. Callahan, and M. J. Toth, “Skeletal muscle myofilament adaptations to aging, disease, and disuse and their effects on whole muscle performance in older adult humans,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, p. 369, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. C. Bodine, “Disuse-induced muscle wasting,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2200–2208, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. W. Booth and P. D. Gollnick, “Effects of disuse on the structure and function of skeletal muscle,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 415–420, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Ohira, T. Yoshinaga, T. Nomura et al., “Gravitational unloading effects on muscle fiber size, phenotype and myonuclear number,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 777–781, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. D. Allen, D. W. Stashuk, K. Kimpinski, T. J. Doherty, M. L. Hourigan, and C. L. Rice, “Increased neuromuscular transmission instability and motor unit remodelling with diabetic neuropathy as assessed using novel near fibre motor unit potential parameters,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 794–802, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. M. Carlson, “The biology of long-term denervated skeletal muscle,” European Journal of Translational Myology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3293–3293, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Castro, D. F. Apple Jr, E. A. Hillegass, and G. A. Dudley, “Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury,” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 373–378, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Dionyssiotis, K. Stathopoulos, G. Trovas, N. Papaioannou, G. Skarantavos, and P. Papagelopoulos, “Impact on bone and muscle area after spinal cord injury,” BoneKEy Reports, vol. 4, p. 633, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Giangregorio and N. McCartney, “Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies,” The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 489–500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. R. Roy, K. M. Baldwin, and V. R. Edgerton, “8 The plasticity of skeletal muscle: effects of neuromuscular activity,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 19, pp. 269–312, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. L. Rowan, K. Rygiel, F. M. Purves-Smith, N. M. Solbak, D. M. Turnbull, and R. T. Hepple, “Denervation causes fiber atrophy and myosin heavy chain co-expression in senescent skeletal muscle,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, article e29082, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Doyle, G. Zhang, E. A. Abdel Fattah, N. T. Eissa, and Y. P. Li, “Toll-like receptor 4 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced muscle catabolism via coordinate activation of ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–110, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Tiao, S. Hobler, J. J. Wang et al., “Sepsis is associated with increased mRNAs of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway in human skeletal muscle,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. Tiao, M. Lieberman, J. E. Fischer, and P. O. Hasselgren, “Intracellular regulation of protein degradation during sepsis is different in fast- and slow-twitch muscle,” The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 272, 3 Part 2, pp. R849–R856, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. R. Pinsky, “Dysregulation of the immune response in severe sepsis,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 328, no. 4, pp. 220–229, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. J. Dehoux, R. P. van Beneden, L. Fernández-Celemín, P. L. Lause, and J. P. Thissen, “Induction of MafBx and Murf ubiquitin ligase mRNAs in rat skeletal muscle after LPS injection,” FEBS Letters, vol. 544, no. 1–3, pp. 214–217, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Vinciguerra, A. Musaro, and N. Rosenthal, “Regulation of muscle atrophy in aging and disease,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 694, pp. 211–233, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. J. Evans and W. W. Campbell, “Sarcopenia and age-related changes in body composition and functional capacity,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 123, Supplement 2, pp. 465–468, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. A. Dennis, B. Przybyla, C. Gurley et al., “Aging alters gene expression of growth and remodeling factors in human skeletal muscle both at rest and in response to acute resistance exercise,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 393–400, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Kortebein, A. Ferrando, J. Lombeida, R. Wolfe, and W. J. Evans, “Effect of 10 days of bed rest on skeletal muscle in healthy older adults,” JAMA, vol. 297, no. 16, pp. 1769–1774, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. M. Cesari, S. B. Kritchevsky, R. N. Baumgartner et al., “Sarcopenia, obesity, and inflammation—results from the Trial of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Novel Cardiovascular Risk Factors study,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 428–434, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Cesari, B. W. Penninx, M. Pahor et al., “Inflammatory markers and physical performance in older persons: the InCHIANTI study,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. M242–M248, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. R. Frontera, V. A. Hughes, R. A. Fielding, M. A. Fiatarone, W. J. Evans, and R. Roubenoff, “Aging of skeletal muscle: a 12-yr longitudinal study,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1321–1326, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. V. E. Baracos, L. Martin, M. Korc, D. C. Guttridge, and K. C. H. Fearon, “Cancer-associated cachexia,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 4, article 17105, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. K. A. Kern and J. A. Norton, “Cancer cachexia,” JPEN Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 286–298, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. J. Tisdale, “Cachexia in cancer patients,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 862–871, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. J. Akashi, J. Springer, and S. D. Anker, “Cachexia in chronic heart failure: prognostic implications and novel therapeutic approaches,” Current Heart Failure Reports, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 198–203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. P. Okoshi, F. G. Romeiro, S. A. Paiva, and K. Okoshi, “Heart failure-induced cachexia,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 476–482, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Plauth and E. T. Schutz, “Cachexia in liver cirrhosis,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Laviano, Z. Krznaric, K. Sanchez-Lara, I. Preziosa, A. Cascino, and F. Rossi Fanelli, “Chronic renal failure, cachexia, and ghrelin,” International Journal of Peptide, vol. 2010, Article ID 648045, 5 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. H. Mak, A. T. Ikizler, C. P. Kovesdy, D. S. Raj, P. Stenvinkel, and K. Kalantar-Zadeh, “Wasting in chronic kidney disease,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. C. Frier, E. G. Noble, and M. Locke, “Diabetes-induced atrophy is associated with a muscle-specific alteration in NF-κB activation and expression,” Cell Stress and Chaperones, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 287–296, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Sishi, B. Loos, B. Ellis, W. Smith, E. F. du Toit, and A. M. Engelbrecht, “Diet-induced obesity alters signalling pathways and induces atrophy and apoptosis in skeletal muscle in a prediabetic rat model,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 179–193, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. W. J. Evans, J. E. Morley, J. Argilés et al., “Cachexia: a new definition,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 793–799, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. E. Morley, D. R. Thomas, and M. M. Wilson, “Cachexia: pathophysiology and clinical relevance,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 735–743, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. S. D. Anker and R. Sharma, “The syndrome of cardiac cachexia,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 51–66, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. von Haehling and S. D. Anker, “Prevalence, incidence and clinical impact of cachexia: facts and numbers—update 2014,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261–263, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. M. Leitner, R. J. Wilson, Z. Yan, and A. Gödecke, “Reactive oxygen species/nitric oxide mediated inter-organ communication in skeletal muscle wasting diseases,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 700–717, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. M. Argilés, S. Busquets, B. Stemmler, and F. J. López-Soriano, “Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 754–762, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Cabello-Verrugio, G. Cordova, and J. D. Salas, “Angiotensin II: role in skeletal muscle atrophy,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 560–569, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Du Bois, C. Pablo Tortola, D. Lodka et al., “Angiotensin II induces skeletal muscle atrophy by activating TFEB-mediated MuRF1 expression,” Circulation Research, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 424–436, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Sukhanov, T. Yoshida, A. Michael Tabony et al., “Angiotensin II, oxidative stress and skeletal muscle wasting,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 342, no. 2, pp. 143–147, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Abrigo, J. C. Rivera, F. Simon, D. Cabrera, and C. Cabello-Verrugio, “Transforming growth factor type beta (TGF-β) requires reactive oxygen species to induce skeletal muscle atrophy,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 366–376, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. L. Mendias, J. P. Gumucio, M. E. Davis, C. W. Bromley, C. S. Davis, and S. V. Brooks, “Transforming growth factor-beta induces skeletal muscle atrophy and fibrosis through the induction of atrogin-1 and scleraxis,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. B. Reid and Y. P. Li, “Tumor necrosis factor-α and muscle wasting: a cellular perspective,” Respiratory Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 269–272, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. F. Haddad, F. Zaldivar, D. M. Cooper, and G. R. Adams, “IL-6-induced skeletal muscle atrophy,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 911–917, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. P. Janssen, G. Gayan-Ramirez, A. van den Bergh et al., “Interleukin-6 causes myocardial failure and skeletal muscle atrophy in rats,” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 996–1005, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. O. Zamir, P. O. Hasselgren, T. Higashiguchi, J. A. Frederick, and J. E. Fischer, “Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) induce muscle proteolysis through different mechanisms,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 247–250, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. M. Rezk, T. Yoshida, L. Semprun-Prieto, Y. Higashi, S. Sukhanov, and P. Delafontaine, “Angiotensin II infusion induces marked diaphragmatic skeletal muscle atrophy,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, article e30276, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T. Kadoguchi, S. Kinugawa, S. Takada et al., “Angiotensin II can directly induce mitochondrial dysfunction, decrease oxidative fibre number and induce atrophy in mouse hindlimb skeletal muscle,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 312–322, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. W. Keller, C. Fokken, S. G. Turville et al., “TNF-α induces macroautophagy and regulates MHC class II expression in human skeletal muscle cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 5, pp. 3970–3980, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Y. Lee, N. S. Hopkinson, and P. R. Kemp, “Myostatin induces autophagy in skeletal muscle in vitro,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 415, no. 4, pp. 632–636, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. Y. P. Li, Y. Chen, J. John et al., “TNF-α acts via p38 MAPK to stimulate expression of the ubiquitin ligase atrogin1/MAFbx in skeletal muscle,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 362–370, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. M. Sanders, S. T. Russell, and M. J. Tisdale, “Angiotensin II directly induces muscle protein catabolism through the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway and may play a role in cancer cachexia,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 425–434, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. Y. P. Li, R. J. Schwartz, I. D. Waddell, B. R. Holloway, and M. B. Reid, “Skeletal muscle myocytes undergo protein loss and reactive oxygen-mediated NF-ĸB activation in response to tumor necrosis factor α,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 871–880, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. Laviano, M. M. Meguid, I. Preziosa, and F. R. Fanelli, “Oxidative stress and wasting in cancer,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 449–456, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. C. Gomes-Marcondes and M. J. Tisdale, “Induction of protein catabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by mild oxidative stress,” Cancer Letters, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 69–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. K. Powers, A. B. Morton, B. Ahn, and A. J. Smuder, “Redox control of skeletal muscle atrophy,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 98, pp. 208–217, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. W. Droge, “Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 47–95, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. K. Powers and M. J. Jackson, “Exercise-induced oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1243–1276, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. Barreiro, B. de la Puente, S. Busquets, F. J. López-Soriano, J. Gea, and J. M. Argilés, “Both oxidative and nitrosative stress are associated with muscle wasting in tumour-bearing rats,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 7, pp. 1646–1652, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. G. Tidball, “Inflammatory processes in muscle injury and repair,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 288, no. 2, pp. R345–R353, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. J. Adhihetty, I. Irrcher, A. M. Joseph, V. Ljubicic, and D. A. Hood, “Plasticity of skeletal muscle mitochondria in response to contractile activity,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 99–107, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. P. A. Kramer, J. Duan, W. J. Qian, and D. J. Marcinek, “The measurement of reversible redox dependent post-translational modifications and their regulation of mitochondrial and skeletal muscle function,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 6, p. 347, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. Mecocci, G. Fanó, S. Fulle et al., “Age-dependent increases in oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and proteins in human skeletal muscle,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 303–308, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. L. A. Callahan, Z. W. She, and T. M. Nosek, “Superoxide, hydroxyl radical, and hydrogen peroxide effects on single-diaphragm fiber contractile apparatus,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. M. B. Reid and W. J. Durham, “Generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in contracting skeletal muscle: potential impact on aging,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 959, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. J. M. Gutteridge and B. Halliwell, “Free radicals and antioxidants in the year 2000. A historical look to the future,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 899, pp. 136–147, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. E. A. Veal, A. M. Day, and B. A. Morgan, “Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Altun, E. Edström, E. Spooner et al., “Iron load and redox stress in skeletal muscle of aged rats,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 223–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. D. Trachootham, W. Lu, M. A. Ogasawara, N. R. D. Valle, and P. Huang, “Redox regulation of cell survival,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1343–1374, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. T. Maraldi, “Natural compounds as modulators of NADPH oxidases,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2013, Article ID 271602, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. Bedard and K. H. Krause, “The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 245–313, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. D. I. Brown and K. K. Griendling, “Nox proteins in signal transduction,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1239–1253, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. T. Ueyama, K. Lekstrom, S. Tsujibe, N. Saito, and T. L. Leto, “Subcellular localization and function of alternatively spliced Noxo1 isoforms,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 180–190, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. N. Lyle, N. N. Deshpande, Y. Taniyama et al., “Poldip2, a novel regulator of Nox4 and cytoskeletal integrity in vascular smooth muscle cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 249–259, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. Coso, I. Harrison, C. B. Harrison et al., “NADPH oxidases as regulators of tumor angiogenesis: current and emerging concepts,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1229–1247, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. I. Takac, K. Schröder, L. Zhang et al., “The E-loop is involved in hydrogen peroxide formation by the NADPH oxidase Nox4,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 15, pp. 13304–13313, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. G. Cheng, Z. Cao, X. Xu, E. G. V. Meir, and J. D. Lambeth, “Homologs of gp91phox: cloning and tissue expression of Nox3, Nox4, and Nox5,” Gene, vol. 269, no. 1-2, pp. 131–140, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. D. Javeshghani, S. A. Magder, E. Barreiro, M. T. Quinn, and S. N. Hussain, “Molecular characterization of a superoxide-generating NAD(P)H oxidase in the ventilatory muscles,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 412–418, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Mansouri, F. L. Muller, Y. Liu et al., “Alterations in mitochondrial function, hydrogen peroxide release and oxidative damage in mouse hind-limb skeletal muscle during aging,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 298–306, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. T. F. Cunha, L. R. G. Bechara, A. V. N. Bacurau et al., “Exercise training decreases NADPH oxidase activity and restores skeletal muscle mass in heart failure rats,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 817–827, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. D. A. Kostić, D. S. Dimitrijević, G. S. Stojanović, I. R. Palić, A. S. Đorđević, and J. D. Ickovski, “Xanthine oxidase: isolation, assays of activity, and inhibition,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 294858, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. Cos, L. Ying, M. Calomme et al., “Structure-activity relationship and classification of flavonoids as inhibitors of xanthine oxidase and superoxide scavengers,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. A. Mittal, A. R. J. Phillips, B. Loveday, and J. A. Windsor, “The potential role for xanthine oxidase inhibition in major intra-abdominal surgery,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 288–295, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. E. E. Kelley, N. K. H. Khoo, N. J. Hundley, U. Z. Malik, B. A. Freeman, and M. M. Tarpey, “Hydrogen peroxide is the major oxidant product of xanthine oxidase,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 493–498, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. W. Doehner and U. Landmesser, “Xanthine oxidase and uric acid in cardiovascular disease: clinical impact and therapeutic options,” Seminars in Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 433–440, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. M. C. I. Lee, M. Velayutham, T. Komatsu, R. Hille, and J. L. Zweier, “Measurement and characterization of superoxide generation from xanthine dehydrogenase: a redox-regulated pathway of radical generation in ischemic tissues,” Biochemistry, vol. 53, no. 41, pp. 6615–6623, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. F. Sanchis-Gomar, H. Pareja-Galeano, C. Perez-Quilis et al., “Effects of allopurinol on exercise-induced muscle damage: new therapeutic approaches?” Cell Stress and Chaperones, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. Y. Hellsten, U. Frandsen, N. Orthenblad, B. Sjødin, and E. A. Richter, “Xanthine oxidase in human skeletal muscle following eccentric exercise: a role in inflammation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 498, no. 1, pp. 239–248, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. A. Kadambi and T. C. Skalak, “Role of leukocytes and tissue-derived oxidants in short-term skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. H435–H443, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. M. C. Gomez-Cabrera, A. Martínez, G. Santangelo, F. V. Pallardó, J. Sastre, and J. Viña, “Oxidative stress in marathon runners: interest of antioxidant supplementation,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 96, Supplement 1, no. S1, pp. S31–S33, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. C. Gómez-Cabrera, F. V. Pallardó, J. Sastre, J. Viña, and L. García-del-Moral, “Allopurinol and markers of muscle damage among participants in the Tour de France,” JAMA, vol. 289, no. 19, pp. 2503-2504, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. J. Viña, M. C. Gomez-Cabrera, A. Lloret et al., “Free radicals in exhaustive physical exercise: mechanism of production, and protection by antioxidants,” IUBMB Life, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 271–277, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. N. Linder, J. Rapola, and K. O. Raivio, “Cellular expression of xanthine oxidoreductase protein in normal human tissues,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 967–974, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  101. J. K. Barclay and M. Hansel, “Free radicals may contribute to oxidative skeletal muscle fatigue,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 279–284, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. D. A. Stofan, L. A. Callahan, A. DiMARCO, D. E. Nethery, and G. S. Supinski, “Modulation of release of reactive oxygen species by the contracting diaphragm,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 161, 3 Part 1, pp. 891–898, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  103. M. J. Ryan, J. R. Jackson, Y. Hao, S. S. Leonard, and S. E. Alway, “Inhibition of xanthine oxidase reduces oxidative stress and improves skeletal muscle function in response to electrically stimulated isometric contractions in aged mice,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 38–52, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. F. Derbre, B. Ferrando, M. C. Gomez-Cabrera et al., “Inhibition of xanthine oxidase by allopurinol prevents skeletal muscle atrophy: role of p38 MAPKinase and E3 ubiquitin ligases,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 10, p. e46668, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. F. Sanchis-Gomar, H. Pareja-Galeano, J. Cortell-Ballester, and C. Perez-Quilis, “Prevention of acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness,” Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 80, p. 748, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  106. K. Schulze-Osthoff, A. C. Bakker, B. Vanhaesebroeck, R. Beyaert, W. A. Jacob, and W. Fiers, “Cytotoxic activity of tumor necrosis factor is mediated by early damage of mitochondrial functions. Evidence for the involvement of mitochondrial radical generation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 8, pp. 5317–5323, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  107. A. Boveris, “[57] Determination of the production of superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 429–435, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. I. N. Zelko, T. J. Mariani, and R. J. Folz, “Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 337–349, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. F. L. Muller, W. Song, Y. Liu et al., “Absence of CuZn superoxide dismutase leads to elevated oxidative stress and acceleration of age-dependent skeletal muscle atrophy,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1993–2004, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. D. F. Dai, Y. A. Chiao, G. M. Martin et al., “Mitochondrial-targeted catalase: extended longevity and the roles in various disease models,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, vol. 146, pp. 203–241, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. G. K. Sakellariou, A. P. Lightfoot, K. E. Earl, M. Stofanko, and B. McDonagh, “Redox homeostasis and age-related deficits in neuromuscular integrity and function,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 881–906, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. B. Pereira, L. F. B. Costa Rosa, D. A. Safi, M. H. G. Medeiros, R. Curi, and E. J. H. Bechara, “Superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activities in muscle and lymphoid organs of sedentary and exercise-trained rats,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1095–1099, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. R. Brigelius-Flohe, “Glutathione peroxidases and redox-regulated transcription factors,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 10-11, pp. 1329–1335, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. L. L. Ji, “Antioxidant signaling in skeletal muscle: a brief review,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 582–593, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. J. M. McCord and M. A. Edeas, “SOD, oxidative stress and human pathologies: a brief history and a future vision,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 139–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. S. Kinugawa, S. Takada, S. Matsushima, K. Okita, and H. Tsutsui, “Skeletal muscle abnormalities in heart failure,” International Heart Journal, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 475–484, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. A. Kaltsatou, G. K. Sakkas, K. P. Poulianiti et al., “Uremic myopathy: is oxidative stress implicated in muscle dysfunction in uremia?” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 6, p. 102, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. P. Delafontaine and M. Akao, “Angiotensin II as candidate of cardiac cachexia,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 220–224, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. S. D. Anker, W. Steinborn, and S. Strassburg, “Cardiac cachexia,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 518–529, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. A. Q. Adigun and A. A. L. Ajayi, “The effects of enalapril-digoxin-diuretic combination therapy on nutritional and anthropometric indices in chronic congestive heart failure: preliminary findings in cardiac cachexia,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 359–363, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. J. S. Chamberlain, “ACE inhibitor bulks up muscle,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 125-126, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. Y. Wei, J. R. Sowers, R. Nistala et al., “Angiotensin II-induced NADPH oxidase activation impairs insulin signaling in skeletal muscle cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 46, pp. 35137–35146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. L. C. Semprun-Prieto, S. Sukhanov, T. Yoshida et al., “Angiotensin II induced catabolic effect and muscle atrophy are redox dependent,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 409, no. 2, pp. 217–221, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. S. T. Russell, H. Eley, and M. J. Tisdale, “Role of reactive oxygen species in protein degradation in murine myotubes induced by proteolysis-inducing factor and angiotensin II,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1797–1806, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. W. Zhao, S. A. Swanson, J. Ye et al., “Reactive oxygen species impair sympathetic vasoregulation in skeletal muscle in angiotensin II–dependent hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 637–643, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. C. Cabello-Verrugio, M. G. Morales, J. C. Rivera, D. Cabrera, and F. Simon, “Renin-angiotensin system: an old player with novel functions in skeletal muscle,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 437–463, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. A. K. Doughan, D. G. Harrison, and S. I. Dikalov, “Molecular mechanisms of angiotensin II–mediated mitochondrial dysfunction: linking mitochondrial oxidative damage and vascular endothelial dysfunction,” Circulation Research, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 488–496, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. H. L. Eley and M. J. Tisdale, “Skeletal muscle atrophy, a link between depression of protein synthesis and increase in degradation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 10, pp. 7087–7097, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. G. Mantovani, A. Macciò, C. Madeddu et al., “Antioxidant agents are effective in inducing lymphocyte progression through cell cycle in advanced cancer patients: assessment of the most important laboratory indexes of cachexia and oxidative stress,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 664–673, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. D. Sanchis, S. Busquets, B. Alvarez, D. Ricquier, F. J. López-Soriano, and J. M. Argilés, “Skeletal muscle UCP2 and UCP3 gene expression in a rat cancer cachexia model,” FEBS Letters, vol. 436, no. 3, pp. 415–418, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. C. Bing, M. Brown, P. King, P. Collins, M. J. Tisdale, and G. Williams, “Increased gene expression of brown fat uncoupling protein (UCP)1 and skeletal muscle UCP2 and UCP3 in MAC16-induced cancer cachexia,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 2405–2410, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  132. S. Busquets, V. Almendro, E. Barreiro, M. Figueras, J. M. Argilés, and F. J. López-Soriano, “Activation of UCPs gene expression in skeletal muscle can be independent on both circulating fatty acids and food intake. Involvement of ROS in a model of mouse cancer cachexia,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 3, pp. 717–722, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. P. Collins, C. Bing, P. McCulloch, and G. Williams, “Muscle UCP-3 mRNA levels are elevated in weight loss associated with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma in humans,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 372–375, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. G. Strassmann, M. Fong, J. S. Kenney, and C. O. Jacob, “Evidence for the involvement of interleukin 6 in experimental cancer cachexia,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1681–1684, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. J. Gelin, L. L. Moldawer, C. Lönnroth, B. Sherry, R. Chizzonite, and K. Lundholm, “Role of endogenous tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 1 for experimental tumor growth and the development of cancer cachexia,” Cancer Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 415–421, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  136. G. Mantovani, A. Macciò, P. Lai, E. Massa, M. Ghiani, and M. C. Santona, “Cytokine activity in cancer-related anorexia/cachexia: role of megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 25, Supplement 6, no. 2, pp. 45–52, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  137. H. J. Smith and M. J. Tisdale, “Signal transduction pathways involved in proteolysis-inducing factor induced proteasome expression in murine myotubes,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1783–1788, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. R. C. Langen, A. M. Schols, M. C. Kelders, J. L. Van Der Velden, E. F. Wouters, and Y. M. Janssen-Heininger, “Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibits myogenesis through redox-dependent and -independent pathways,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 283, no. 3, pp. C714–C721, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. Y. S. Kim, M. J. Morgan, S. Choksi, and Z. G. Liu, “TNF-induced activation of the Nox1 NADPH oxidase and its role in the induction of necrotic cell death,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 675–687, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. M. J. Sullivan-Gunn, S. P. Campbell-O'Sullivan, M. J. Tisdale, and P. A. Lewandowski, “Decreased NADPH oxidase expression and antioxidant activity in cachectic skeletal muscle,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 181–188, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. G. Mantovani and C. Madeddu, “Cancer cachexia: medical management,” Support Care Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. Springer, A. Tschirner, K. Hartman et al., “Inhibition of xanthine oxidase reduces wasting and improves outcome in a rat model of cancer cachexia,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 2187–2196, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. V. Banduseela, J. Ochala, K. Lamberg, H. Kalimo, and L. Larsson, “Muscle paralysis and myosin loss in a patient with cancer cachexia,” Acta Myologica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 136–144, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  144. S. H. Lecker, R. T. Jagoe, A. Gilbert et al., “Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. M. Sandri, “Protein breakdown in muscle wasting: role of autophagy-lysosome and ubiquitin-proteasome,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2121–2129, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. J. P. Gumucio and C. L. Mendias, “Atrogin-1, MuRF-1, and sarcopenia,” Endocrine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. D. L. Waning, K. S. Mohammad, S. Reiken et al., “Excess TGF-β mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1262–1271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. C. Cabello-Verrugio, J. C. Rivera, and D. Garcia, “Skeletal muscle wasting: new role of nonclassical renin-angiotensin system,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 158–163, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. Y. P. Li, Y. Chen, A. S. Li, and M. B. Reid, “Hydrogen peroxide stimulates ubiquitin-conjugating activity and expression of genes for specific E2 and E3 proteins in skeletal muscle myotubes,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 285, no. 4, pp. C806–C812, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  150. S. T. Russell, P. M. A. Siren, M. J. Siren, and M. J. Tisdale, “Attenuation of skeletal muscle atrophy in cancer cachexia by D-myo-inositol 1,2,6-triphosphate,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 517–527, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. Y. P. Li and M. B. Reid, “NF-κB mediates the protein loss induced by TNF-α in differentiated skeletal muscle myotubes,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 279, no. 4, pp. R1165–R1170, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. M. D. Layne and S. R. Farmer, “Tumor necrosis factor-α and basic fibroblast growth factor differentially inhibit the insulin-like growth factor-I induced expression of myogenin in C2C12 myoblasts,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 177–187, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. M. Pedersen, H. Bruunsgaard, N. Weis et al., “Circulating levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6-relation to truncal fat mass and muscle mass in healthy elderly individuals and in patients with type-2 diabetes,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 495–502, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. R. L. Campbell and P. L. Davies, “Structure-function relationships in calpains,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 447, no. 3, pp. 335–351, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. D. E. Goll, V. F. Thompson, H. Li, W. Wei, and J. Cong, “The calpain system,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 731–801, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. A. J. Smuder, A. N. Kavazis, M. B. Hudson, W. B. Nelson, and S. K. Powers, “Oxidation enhances myofibrillar protein degradation via calpain and caspase-3,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1152–1160, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. J. M. McClung, A. R. Judge, E. E. Talbert, and S. K. Powers, “Calpain-1 is required for hydrogen peroxide-induced myotube atrophy,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 296, no. 2, pp. C363–C371, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. E. Dargelos, C. Brulé, P. Stuelsatz et al., “Up-regulation of calcium-dependent proteolysis in human myoblasts under acute oxidative stress,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 316, no. 1, pp. 115–125, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. M. A. Whidden, A. J. Smuder, M. Wu, M. B. Hudson, W. B. Nelson, and S. K. Powers, “Oxidative stress is required for mechanical ventilation-induced protease activation in the diaphragm,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1376–1382, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. S. K. Powers, A. N. Kavazis, and J. M. McClung, “Oxidative stress and disuse muscle atrophy,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 2389–2397, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. E. Dargelos, S. Poussard, C. Brulé, L. Daury, and P. Cottin, “Calcium-dependent proteolytic system and muscle dysfunctions: a possible role of calpains in sarcopenia,” Biochimie, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 359–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. J. I. Kourie, “Interaction of reactive oxygen species with ion transport mechanisms,” The American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. C1–C24, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. J. R. Florini, D. Z. Ewton, and S. A. Coolican, “Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 481–517, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. D. Chrysis and L. E. Underwood, “Regulation of components of the ubiquitin system by insulin-like growth factor I and growth hormone in skeletal muscle of rats made catabolic with dexamethasone,” Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 12, pp. 5635–5641, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  165. D. Hong and N. E. Forsberg, “Effects of serum and insulin-like growth factor I on protein degradation and protease gene expression in rat L8 myotubes,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 2279–2288, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  166. M. A. Lawlor and P. Rotwein, “Insulin-like growth factor-mediated muscle cell survival: central roles for Akt and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 8983–8995, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. S. P. Attard-Montalto, C. Camacho-Hübner, A. M. Cotterill et al., “Changes in protein turnover, IGF-I and IGF binding proteins in children with cancer,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 54–60, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. P. Costelli, M. Muscaritoli, M. Bossola et al., “IGF-1 is downregulated in experimental cancer cachexia,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 291, no. 3, pp. R674–R683, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. J. Fan, P. E. Molina, M. C. Gelato, and C. H. Lang, “Differential tissue regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I content and binding proteins after endotoxin,” Endocrinology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1685–1692, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. M. Sandri, C. Sandri, A. Gilbert et al., “Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy,” Cell, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 399–412, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. J. Papaconstantinou, “Insulin/IGF-1 and ROS signaling pathway cross-talk in aging and longevity determination,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 89–100, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. N. Bashan, J. Kovsan, I. Kachko, H. Ovadia, and A. Rudich, “Positive and negative regulation of insulin signaling by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 27–71, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. M. Genestra, “Oxyl radicals, redox-sensitive signalling cascades and antioxidants,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1807–1819, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. J. V. Cross and D. J. Templeton, “Regulation of signal transduction through protein cysteine oxidation,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 9-10, pp. 1819–1827, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. R. Wani, J. Qian, L. Yin et al., “Isoform-specific regulation of Akt by PDGF-induced reactive oxygen species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 26, pp. 10550–10555, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. L. Coderre, K. V. Kandror, G. Vallega, and P. F. Pilch, “Identification and characterization of an exercise-sensitive pool of glucose transporters in skeletal muscle,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 46, pp. 27584–27588, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  177. S. Lund, G. D. Holman, O. Schmitz, and O. Pedersen, “Contraction stimulates translocation of glucose transporter GLUT4 in skeletal muscle through a mechanism distinct from that of insulin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 13, pp. 5817–5821, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. M. Sandri, “Autophagy in skeletal muscle,” FEBS Letters, vol. 584, no. 7, pp. 1411–1416, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  179. J. Navarro-Yepes, M. Burns, A. Anandhan et al., “Oxidative stress, redox signaling, and autophagy: cell death versus survival,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–85, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  180. J. J. Lum, R. J. DeBerardinis, and C. B. Thompson, “Autophagy in metazoans: cell survival in the land of plenty,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 439–448, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. B. Levine and G. Kroemer, “Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease,” Cell, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 27–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  182. G. G. Rodney, R. Pal, and R. Abo-Zahrah, “Redox regulation of autophagy in skeletal muscle,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 98, pp. 103–112, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  183. R. Pal, M. Palmieri, J. A. Loehr et al., “Src-dependent impairment of autophagy by oxidative stress in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, article 4425, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. M. Chrisam, M. Pirozzi, S. Castagnaro et al., “Reactivation of autophagy by spermidine ameliorates the myopathic defects of collagen VI-null mice,” Autophagy, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2142–2152, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. Y. Xiao, C. Ma, J. Yi et al., “Suppressed autophagy flux in skeletal muscle of an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model during disease progression,” Physiological Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, article e12271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. Y. Guo, H. R. Gosker, A. M. W. J. Schols et al., “Autophagy in locomotor muscles of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 188, no. 11, pp. 1313–1320, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  187. J. Gea, S. Pascual, C. Casadevall, M. Orozco-Levi, and E. Barreiro, “Muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: update on causes and biological findings,” Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. E418–E438, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. F. Stana, M. Vujovic, D. Mayaki et al., “Differential regulation of the autophagy and proteasome pathways in skeletal muscles in sepsis,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. e971–e979, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  189. G. Gortan Cappellari, A. Semolic, G. Ruozi et al., “Unacylated ghrelin normalizes skeletal muscle oxidative stress and prevents muscle catabolism by enhancing tissue mitophagy in experimental chronic kidney disease,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 5159–5171, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  190. E. Pigna, E. Berardi, P. Aulino et al., “Aerobic exercise and pharmacological treatments counteract cachexia by modulating autophagy in colon cancer,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 26991, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. G. Dobrowolny, M. Aucello, E. Rizzuto et al., “Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 425–436, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. Y. Chen, M. B. Azad, and S. B. Gibson, “Superoxide is the major reactive oxygen species regulating autophagy,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1040–1052, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. R. Scherz-Shouval and Z. Elazar, “Regulation of autophagy by ROS: physiology and pathology,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  194. M. Rahman, M. Mofarrahi, A. S. Kristof, B. Nkengfac, S. Harel, and S. N. A. Hussain, “Reactive oxygen species regulation of autophagy in skeletal muscles,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 443–459, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  195. E. E. Talbert, A. J. Smuder, K. Min, O. S. Kwon, H. H. Szeto, and S. K. Powers, “Immobilization-induced activation of key proteolytic systems in skeletal muscles is prevented by a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 529–538, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  196. P. L. Tan, T. Shavlakadze, M. D. Grounds, and P. G. Arthur, “Differential thiol oxidation of the signaling proteins Akt, PTEN or PP2A determines whether Akt phosphorylation is enhanced or inhibited by oxidative stress in C2C12 myotubes derived from skeletal muscle,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 62, pp. 72–79, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. A. Nakanishi, Y. Wada, Y. Kitagishi, and S. Matsuda, “Link between PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway and NOX proteinin diseases,” Aging and Disease, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 203–211, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  198. J. M. McClung, A. R. Judge, S. K. Powers, and Z. Yan, “p38 MAPK links oxidative stress to autophagy-related gene expression in cachectic muscle wasting,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 298, no. 3, pp. C542–C549, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  199. L. Yuan, S. Wei, J. Wang, and X. Liu, “Isoorientin induces apoptosis and autophagy simultaneously by reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related p53, PI3K/Akt, JNK, and p38 signaling pathways in HepG2 cancer cells,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 23, pp. 5390–5400, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  200. W. J. Duan, Q. S. Li, M. Y. Xia, S. I. Tashiro, S. Onodera, and T. Ikejima, “Silibinin activated p53 and induced autophagic death in human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells via reactive oxygen species-p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  201. S. B. Jorgensen, E. A. Richter, and J. F. Wojtaszewski, “Role of AMPK in skeletal muscle metabolic regulation and adaptation in relation to exercise,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 574, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  202. I. Irrcher, V. Ljubicic, and D. A. Hood, “Interactions between ROS and AMP kinase activity in the regulation of PGC-1α transcription in skeletal muscle cells,” The American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. C116–C123, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  203. D. L. Allen, J. K. Linderman, R. R. Roy et al., “Apoptosis: a mechanism contributing to remodeling of skeletal muscle in response to hindlimb unweighting,” The American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. C579–C587, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  204. A. B. Borisov and B. M. Carlson, “Cell death in denervated skeletal muscle is distinct from classical apoptosis,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 258, no. 3, pp. 305–318, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  205. D. L. Allen, R. R. Roy, and V. R. Edgerton, “Myonuclear domains in muscle adaptation and disease,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1350–1360, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  206. S. Gupta, “Molecular steps of tumor necrosis factor receptor-mediated apoptosis,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 317–324, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  207. A. G. Agusti, J. Sauleda, C. Miralles et al., “Skeletal muscle apoptosis and weight loss in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 166, no. 4, pp. 485–489, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  208. D. Verzola, V. Procopio, A. Sofia et al., “Apoptosis and myostatin mRNA are upregulated in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 773–782, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  209. V. Adams, H. Jiang, J. Yu et al., “Apoptosis in skeletal myocytes of patients with chronic heart failure is associated with exercise intolerance,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 959–965, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  210. G. Vescovo, M. Volterrani, R. Zennaro et al., “Apoptosis in the skeletal muscle of patients with heart failure: investigation of clinical and biochemical changes,” Heart, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 431–437, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  211. M. Brink, S. R. Price, J. Chrast et al., “Angiotensin II induces skeletal muscle wasting through enhanced protein degradation and down-regulates autocrine insulin-like growth factor I,” Endocrinology, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 1489–1496, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  212. M. Brink, J. Wellen, and P. Delafontaine, “Angiotensin II causes weight loss and decreases circulating insulin-like growth factor I in rats through a pressor-independent mechanism,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 2509–2516, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  213. C. Meneses, M. G. Morales, J. Abrigo, F. Simon, E. Brandan, and C. Cabello-Verrugio, “The angiotensin-(1–7)/Mas axis reduces myonuclear apoptosis during recovery from angiotensin II-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in mice,” Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, vol. 467, no. 9, pp. 1975–1984, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  214. P. M. Siu, Y. Wang, and S. E. Alway, “Apoptotic signaling induced by H2O2-mediated oxidative stress in differentiated C2C12 myotubes,” Life Sciences, vol. 84, no. 13-14, pp. 468–481, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  215. S. D. Anker, W. Doehner, M. Rauchhaus et al., “Uric acid and survival in chronic heart failure: validation and application in metabolic, functional, and hemodynamic staging,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 15, pp. 1991–1997, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  216. J. Abrigo, J. C. Rivera, J. Aravena et al., “High fat diet-induced skeletal muscle wasting is decreased by mesenchymal stem cells administration: implications on oxidative stress, ubiquitin proteasome pathway activation, and myonuclear apoptosis,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 9047821, 13 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  217. E. Barreiro and S. Tajbakhsh, “Epigenetic regulation of muscle development,” Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  218. R. M. Carr, E. Enriquez-Hesles, R. L. O. Olson, A. Jatoi, J. Doles, and M. E. Fernandez-Zapico, “Epigenetics of cancer-associated muscle catabolism,” Epigenomics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1259–1265, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  219. D. T. Shaughnessy, K. McAllister, L. Worth et al., “Mitochondria, energetics, epigenetics, and cellular responses to stress,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 1271–1278, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  220. M. Liesa, M. Palacin, and A. Zorzano, “Mitochondrial dynamics in mammalian health and disease,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 799–845, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  221. I. Novak, “Mitophagy: a complex mechanism of mitochondrial removal,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 794–802, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  222. B. Westermann, “Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 872–884, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  223. R. J. Youle and D. P. Narendra, “Mechanisms of mitophagy,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. E. Marzetti, M. Lorenzi, F. Landi et al., “Altered mitochondrial quality control signaling in muscle of old gastric cancer patients with cachexia,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 87, Part A, pp. 92–99, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  225. R. F. Roberts, M. Y. Tang, E. A. Fon, and T. M. Durcan, “Defending the mitochondria: the pathways of mitophagy and mitochondrial-derived vesicles,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 79, pp. 427–436, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. P. S. Brookes, Y. Yoon, J. L. Robotham, M. W. Anders, and S. S. Sheu, “Calcium, ATP, and ROS: a mitochondrial love-hate triangle,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 287, no. 4, pp. C817–C833, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  227. N. Cheema, A. Herbst, D. McKenzie, and J. M. Aiken, “Apoptosis and necrosis mediate skeletal muscle fiber loss in age-induced mitochondrial enzymatic abnormalities,” Aging Cell, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1085–1093, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  228. N. M. Held and R. H. Houtkooper, “Mitochondrial quality control pathways as determinants of metabolic health,” BioEssays, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 867–876, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  229. S. G. Rhee, H. A. Woo, I. S. Kil, and S. H. Bae, “Peroxiredoxin functions as a peroxidase and a regulator and sensor of local peroxides,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 7, pp. 4403–4410, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  230. R. Scherz-Shouval and Z. Elazar, “ROS, mitochondria and the regulation of autophagy,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 422–427, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  231. G. Twig, A. Elorza, A. J. A. Molina et al., “Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 433–446, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. J. A. Carson, J. P. Hardee, and B. N. VanderVeen, “The emerging role of skeletal muscle oxidative metabolism as a biological target and cellular regulator of cancer-induced muscle wasting,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 54, pp. 53–67, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. K. Boengler, M. Kosiol, M. Mayr, R. Schulz, and S. Rohrbach, “Mitochondria and ageing: role in heart, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 349–369, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  234. M. Chen, Z. Chen, Y. Wang et al., “Mitophagy receptor FUNDC1 regulates mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 689–702, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  235. A. Lang, R. Anand, S. Altinoluk-Hambüchen et al., “SIRT4 interacts with OPA1 and regulates mitochondrial quality control and mitophagy,” Aging, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2163–2189, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. K. Palikaras, E. Lionaki, and N. Tavernarakis, “Balancing mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy to maintain energy metabolism homeostasis,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1399–1401, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  237. K. Palikaras, E. Lionaki, and N. Tavernarakis, “Coordination of mitophagy and mitochondrial biogenesis during ageing in C. elegans,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 525–528, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  238. C. Ploumi, I. Daskalaki, and N. Tavernarakis, “Mitochondrial biogenesis and clearance: a balancing act,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 183–195, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. J. Sin, A. M. Andres, D. J. R. Taylor et al., “Mitophagy is required for mitochondrial biogenesis and myogenic differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 369–380, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus