Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Mechanisms of Cell Damage in Neurological Diseases and Putative Neuroprotective Strategies

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2596043 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2596043

Cell Type-Specific Mechanisms in the Pathogenesis of Ischemic Stroke: The Role of Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase 1

Academic Editor: Perla D. Maldonado
Received14 Oct 2017
Revised10 Feb 2018
Accepted22 Feb 2018
Published20 Mar 2018


Stroke has become a more common disease worldwide. Despite great efforts to develop treatment, little is known about ischemic stroke. Cerebral ischemia activates multiple cascades of cell type-specific pathomechanisms. Ischemic brain injury consists of a complex series of cellular reactions in various cell types within the central nervous system (CNS) including platelets, endothelial cells, astrocytes, neutrophils, microglia/macrophages, and neurons. Diverse cellular changes after ischemic injury are likely to induce cell death and tissue damage in the brain. Since cells in the brain exhibit different functional roles at distinct time points after injury (acute/subacute/chronic phases), it is difficult to pinpoint genuine roles of cell types after brain injury. Many experimental studies have shown the association of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) with cellular pathomechanisms after cerebral ischemia. Blockade of ASK1, by either pharmacological or genetic manipulation, leads to reduced ischemic brain injury and subsequent neuroprotective effects. In this review, we present the cell type-specific pathophysiology of the early phase of ischemic stroke, the role of ASK1 suggested by preclinical studies, and the potential use of ASK suppression, either by pharmacologic or genetic suppression, as a promising therapeutic option for ischemic stroke recovery.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke is a heterogeneous neurologic disorder characterized by sudden onset and multiple environmental risk factors [1, 2]. Ischemic stroke develops as a result of complex pathomechanisms induced by a critical reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF) caused by either sudden or gradual occlusion of cerebral arteries [3, 4]. The brain requires large amounts of oxygen and glucose from the blood for energy metabolism; thus, blockage of blood circulation causes neurologic deficits [35]. The epicenter of a stroke, the area of the brain with crucially impaired blood flow, is referred to as the “infarct core,” and the neighboring area is referred to as the “ischemic penumbra” or salvageable area [35]. Ischemia-related pathologic reactions can last for days to weeks in these areas of the brain [4]. The main pathologic changes involved in ischemic stroke are energy depletion, calcium overload, excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, inflammatory signals, and ion imbalance, all of which can lead to cell death [3, 5, 6]. These changes are severely detrimental to neuronal, glial, and endothelial cell function [5] and lead to platelet activation, reactive gliosis, immune cell activation, and neuronal cell death in the ischemic brain [3, 5, 7]. Over the last decades, various stroke models have been designed in an effort to find new therapies for stroke [8]. However, therapeutic candidates from preclinical studies have failed to translate into effective therapies [8]. In this review, we will address the underlying pathophysiology of ischemic stroke briefly, focusing on cell type-specific mechanisms generated from preclinical ischemic stroke models. Additionally, we discuss apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) as a potential therapeutic target based on preclinical testing.

2. ASK1

ASK1 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) family, which activates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAP2K: MKK4/MKK7, MKK3/MKK6) and leads to the subsequent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) as part of a signaling cascade [912]. ASK1 is endogenously expressed in various cell types [13]. It is comprised of 1375 amino acids in humans and 1379 in mice, and it contains a serine/threonine kinase domain in the middle region [14]. The phosphorylation of threonine residues (Thr 838 in human and Thr 845 in mouse) is important for ASK1 activation [10, 15]. In normal conditions, ASK1 is a homooligomer, which binds to another ASK1 via its C-terminal coiled-coil domain. The N-terminal coiled-coil domain of ASK1 binds to thioredoxin (Trx), which suppresses ASK1 kinase activity [9, 15]. Under oxidative stress conditions, oxidized Trx is separated from ASK1, and unbound ASK1 is activated by phosphorylation [11, 16]. Calcium influx and oxidative stress can elicit phosphorylation of the ASK1 Thr residue [10, 15]. In addition, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) and TRAF6 act as positive regulators of ASK1 after hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) injury [10]. Negative regulators of ASK1, 14-3-3 proteins, block activation of ASK1 in the steady state by binding to the C-terminal of ASK1 after Ser 966 phosphorylation [9, 10, 15]. However, oxidative stress promotes dephosphorylation of ASK1 at Ser 966 and leads to detachment of 14-3-3, which results in activation of ASK1 [10]. ASK1 is activated not only from oxidative stress but also from endoplasmic reticulum stress and bacterial infection [9, 11, 14]. Both Fas death receptor and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) also activate ASK1 [17, 18]. ASK1 is known as an early responder to ROS after cerebral ischemia [19]. After exposure to various stimuli, activated ASK1 initiates multiple signaling cascades, including c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38, and governs cellular mechanisms, including cell death, growth, and differentiation (Figure 1) [10, 14, 20]. Although ASK1 has previously been known to be mainly involved in apoptotic cell death [21], recent research has identified other functions of ASK1, such as its association with thrombosis, brain edema, inflammatory responses, and reactive gliosis after cerebral ischemia [19, 2224].

Genetic/pharmacological inhibition of ASK1DosageApplicationInjury or durationMain outcomeReference

ASK1 knockout (KO)ASK1 KO miceOptic nerve injuryEye: apoptotic cell death↓, MCP-1↓, TNF-α↓, iNOS↓[77]
MEF cellsH2O2 or TNF treatmentApoptotic cell death↓[96]
PlateletsThromboxane A2↓, platelet granule secretion↓[22]
ASK1 KO miceFeCl3-induced injuryCarotid artery thrombosis↓[22]
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) for ASK1μM/mice (ICV)C57/BL6 mice3 days before ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injuryBrain: brain edema↓, VEGF↓, AQP-1↓[24]
μM/mice (ICV)C57/BL6 mice3 days before I/R injuryBrain: neuronal cell death↓, MMP-9↓[50]
μM/mice (ICV)C57/BL6 mice3 days before I/R injuryBrain: GFAP↓, glial scar formation↓[19]
μM/mice (ICV)C57/BL6 mice3 days before I/R injuryBrain: IL-6↓,TNF-α↓, IL-1β[23]
μM/mice (ICV)C57/BL6 mice3 days before I/R injuryBrain: infarct volume↓[21]
Nanoparticles with anti-ASK1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA)150 μg/rat (IV)Spraque-Dawley rats2 days before I/R injuryBrain: apoptotic cell death↓, infarct injury↓[101]
NQDI-1, ASK1 inhibitor600 nMbEnd.3 cell line3 hrs before oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD)VEGF↓[24]
600 nMbEnd.3 cell line1 hr before OGD/6 hrs during OGDReleased MMP-9↓[50]
600 nMBV2 cell line1 hr before OGD/4 hrs during OGDIL-6↓, TNF-α↓, IL-1β↓, iNOS↓[23]
600 nMRAW 264.7 cell line1 hr before OGD/4 hrs during OGDIL-6↓, TNF-α↓, IL-1β↓, iNOS↓[23]
250 nmol/pup (IH)Spraque-Dawley rats30 mins before hypoxia-ischemia (HI) injuryBrain: caspase-3↓, infarct volume↓, apoptotic cell death↓[100]
AGI-1067, ASK1 inhibitor10 μMHAEC cells1 hr before LPS/during LPS treatmentVCAM-1↓, E-selectin↓, IL-6↓, MCP-1↓[73]
Thioredoxinμg/g (IV)C57/BL6 mice10 mins before ventilationInfiltration of neutrophils↓, MPO↓[75]
MSC2032964A, ASK1 inhibitor10 μMPrimary microglia cells1 hr before LPS treatmentTNF-α↓, iNOS↓[77]

3. Platelets and ASK1

Ischemic stroke is linked to vascular occlusion due to a thrombus or emboli in the brain [25]. Platelets are necessary for thrombosis and thromboembolism formation [26]. Platelet-induced thrombosis is associated with platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation [27]. Normally, homeostasis is maintained by coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet function [28]. When homeostasis breaks down, platelets are involved in thrombus formation through a complex process [27]. For initial adhesion, platelets make connections between platelet surface receptors (glycoprotein (GP) Ib-V-IX complex or integrin αIIbβ3 and α2β1) and adhesive substrates (von Willebrand factor (vWF) and collagen) on an exposed endothelial extracellular matrix (ECM) [2931]. The platelet GP IIb/IIIa surface receptor mediates platelet aggregation through platelet-platelet interactions with extracellular fibrinogen and vWF [25, 27, 29]. These binding events trigger platelet activation and intracellular signaling pathways, which induce the production of thrombin and promote the release of activating factors (granule contents) (adenosine diphosphate (ADP), epinephrine, and thromboxane A2 (TXA2)) [27]. These factors can increase GP IIb/IIIa and calcium levels [32, 33]. Upregulated calcium can induce an increase in phospholipase A2(PLA2) [34]. A previous study proved the expression of p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2), and JNK1 in platelets, which can be activated by thrombin, collagen, vWF, and ADP [35]. ASK1, expressed in human and murine platelets, has recently been found to be rapidly activated by different platelet agonists (ADP, convulxin, and thrombin) [22]. Genetic depletion of ASK1 leads to defects in platelet aggregation, impaired integrin αIIbβ3 activation, and reduced TXA2 generation [22]. In Ask1−/− platelets, inhibition of cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), an important enzyme in the generation of TXA2, led to a reduction in thrombin-, collagen-, and convulxin-induced TXA2 production [22]. Impaired platelet functions, caused by ASK1 depletion in platelets, result in thrombosis deterioration, which eventually becomes protective against arterial thrombosis [22]. Hence, ASK1 serves as an important factor in thrombosis, and its activation is associated with an increased risk factor for ischemic stroke.

4. Endothelial Cells and ASK1

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) consists of a highly specialized endothelial structure and maintains brain homeostasis by controlling para- and transcellular transport between blood and the extracellular space [36]. Brain interendothelial junction complex contains adherence junctions (vascular endothelial cadherin, β-catenin), gap junctions (connexins), and tight junctions (claudins, occludins, and junctional adhesion molecules (JAM)), which are important for constructing barriers and cell-cell communication [3639]. However, pathological conditions, such as ischemic stroke, can change BBB permeability and interactions between endothelial cells [36, 37]. A damaged BBB allows blood to enter the parenchyma and causes brain damage [40], followed by cerebral edema and vasomotor/hemodynamic dysfunctions [40].

Metalloproteinases (MMPs) and proteolytic enzymes can affect BBB integrity by degrading neurovascular substrates [37, 39]. Deterioration of the BBB caused by MMP-mediated tight junction degradation is mainly associated with MMP-9 [37]. BBB breakdown permits water into the extracellular compartments and results in vasogenic edema in the injured brain [41]. MMPs also contribute to edema formation [42]. Several reports have concluded that the excessive activation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in the ischemic brain and cerebral endothelium leads to cellular damage [39, 43]. By inhibiting MMPs, vascular hyper permeability can be reduced by impeding degradation of gap junction proteins and rearrangement of tight junction proteins [44]. In this context, MMP-9 knockout contributes to preventing BBB disruption and enlargement of brain lesion [45].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a vascular permeability factor, is involved in the formation of vascular leakages and vasogenic edema [44]. VEGF has permeabilizing effects on the endothelium through MMP-9-induced reduction of tight junction proteins (zo-1, occludin) [44]. Previous studies have shown that administration of recombinant human VEGF165 exacerbates the breakdown of BBB integrity, which can be prevented by inhibiting VEGF at an early stage of ischemic stroke [46, 47]. A relationship between increased activation of MMP-9- and VEGF-induced BBB leakage had also been identified [48].

Although ASK1 is necessary for angiogenesis and the recovery of blood flow by direct expression of VEGF and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) after unilateral hindlimb ischemia, ASK1 and VEGF play an important role in vascular permeability in cerebral ischemia [24, 49]. Inhibition of ASK1 reduces ischemia-induced edema formation and the expression of VEGF and aquaporin-1 (water channel protein) [24]. In addition, ASK1 silencing by siRNA decreases gene levels of Mmp3, Vegf-a, Vegf-c, and Aquaporin 12 and 18 [24]. ASK1 inhibition reduces MMP-9 activity in both mice and endothelial cell cultures. These results suggest a role for ASK1 in suppressing neuronal cell death [50], based on its profound effect on BBB permeability and brain edema formation after ischemic stroke.

5. Immune Cells and ASK1

After cerebral ischemia, circulating blood leukocytes migrate across disrupted vessel walls into the cerebral parenchyma [40]. During this influx of immune cells, adhesion molecules, such as vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-selectin, and P-selectin, promote the transendothelial recruitment of immune cells [5153]. Infiltrating immune cells accumulate in the brain lesion and trigger the release of inflammatory cytokines, which further promote tissue damage [40]. Peripheral blood cells are involved in a variety of functions, from cell death to cell recovery, depending on the time course of the ischemic stroke [54].

Neutrophils are subpopulations of leukocytes, which exacerbate neuronal damage by participating in the early stages of ischemic stroke [40, 55]. Transmigrated neutrophils possess neurotoxic properties and produce cytokines, protease, chemokines, and ROS [56, 57]. Neutrophils also release neurotoxic-related neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), composed of proteases and decondensed DNA [56]. Moreover, oxygen free radicals and proteolytic enzymes are also released from penetrated neutrophil [58]. Several studies have proven that the inhibition of either neutrophil accumulation or adhesion can diminish ischemic brain injury [55, 58]. Prevention of neutrophil infiltration toward the ischemic lesion has beneficial effects on the ischemic brain [59]. Inhibition of neutrophils by anti-neutrophil antibody (RP3) efficiently reduces the extent of brain infarction and the cerebral water content [60].

Brain microglia, representative immune cells of the brain, contribute to the immune systems in the CNS through defense mechanisms such as phagocytosis [40, 61]. After acute cerebral ischemia, microglia are activated in response to the influx of immune cells and become indistinguishable from macrophages [6264]. Microglia are activated via the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway in response to cellular damage after cerebral ischemia and release cytotoxic and cytoprotective substances [40, 61]. Infiltrated blood-borne macrophages in infarcted brain tissue are key modulators of the immune system [63]. Although microglial activation leads to tissue injury during early stages of cerebral ischemia, microglia/macrophages participate in tissue recovery during the late course of ischemia [65]. Astrocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, as well as resident microglia and peripheral macrophage, are involved in the production of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), transforming necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) [58, 61, 62, 64, 66]. Although microglia and macrophages are associated with brain plasticity and recovery at later stages of cerebral ischemia, several studies have reported that microglia and macrophages induce neuronal injury through a TLR-4-dependent manner and trigger the proinflammatory mediator in the acute stages of ischemic stroke [6769]. Pharmacological inhibition of microglia showed protective effects in cerebral ischemia by inhibiting a microglia-derived inflammatory mediator. Suppression of activated microglia by minocycline led to reduced brain infarction, improved neurological deficits, and diminished BBB leakage [70, 71]. Moreover, macrophage-derived angiopoietin-like protein 2 knockout contributed to reduced brain injury [67].

ASK1 is closely related to the immune system and is required in inflammatory responses [14, 72]. It has been reported that TLR4 activates ASK1 to initiate the MAPK pathway and thereby express inflammatory-related genes [73]. MAPK also mediates expression of a variety of inflammatory genes such as cell surface adhesion molecules, chemokines, and cytokines [74]. ASK1 is linked to ventilation-induced cytokine production, neutrophil infiltration, and cell death in the lung [75]. The TLR/ASK1/p38 pathway is important in chemokine production and in triggering neurotoxicity in multiple sclerosis [76]. ASK1 contributes to production of TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in primary microglia cell culture [77]. However, ASK1 knockout in vivo and in vitro models diminished lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced upregulation of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α and diminished LPS-exaggerated injury [9, 14, 72]. LPS-induced ASK1/p38 signals and cytokine production in the RAW264.7 macrophage cell line are attenuated by antioxidants [14]. From previous studies on ischemic injury, it is known that ASK1 silencing by siRNA reduces infiltrated macrophages/resident microglia in brain regions such as the striatum, cortex, and hippocampus, and ASK1 silencing downregulates proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in the ipsilateral hemisphere at late stages of cerebral ischemia. In the RAW264.7 macrophage cell line and BV2 microglia cell line, ASK1 inhibition diminishes the release of proinflammatory mediators [23]. From a genetic perspective, microarray analysis shows that ASK1 silencing decreased the gene levels of Il1b, Il6, Cxcl2, Cxcl1, and Ccl2 [19]. Considering the relationship between ASK1 and the immune response, ASK1 could be an important regulator of the inflammatory response after ischemic stroke.

6. Astrocytes and ASK1

The key roles of astrocytes in the neuronal system are involved in the maintenance of brain physiology and neuronal support, both structurally and metabolically, through neurotransmitter regulation (glutamate uptake/release), ion buffering, scavenging free radicals, enhancing BBB integrity, and regulating water transports [7881]. However, astrocytes become hyperactivated in response to ischemic stress and extend their processes, changing morphology with the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) [7, 78]. Astrocytes migrate toward the injury site and thus accumulate and produce a glial scar [7, 19, 80]. It has been reported that astrocytes produce and release either trophic factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), fibroblast growth factor-2, and nerve growth factor (NGF)) or inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and interferon-gamma (IFNγ)) [79, 82]. Trophic factors play crucial roles in neuronal survival and protection, while inflammatory mediators contribute to brain injury [18, 63, 83, 84]. Therefore, it is known that astrocytes play dual roles in the immune system [78]. Although several studies have provided evidence of the relationship between reactive astrocytes and neurogenesis, previous reports have suggested that reactive astrocytes block neuronal regeneration [19, 81, 8587].

ASK1 is present in astrocytes and is strongly expressed after cerebral ischemia. Readily identified reactive astrocytes in ischemic lesions form a glial scar in the chronic phase of ischemic stroke, which delays extension of neurite and functional recovery [19]. However, siRNA targeting ASK1 reduced reactive astrocyte marker GFAP in both in vivo and in vitro studies, decreased glial scar formation, and promoted neuronal plasticity and functional performance [19]. Moreover, ASK1 deletion suppressed mitochondrial complex I inhibitor 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine- (MPTP-) induced astrocyte activation and protected against degeneration of dopaminergic neurons [88]. In addition, p38, a molecule downstream of ASK1, is also associated with reactive astrogliosis, and a conditional GFAP/p38 knockout reduced astrogliosis [89]. Therefore, several lines of evidence show that ASK1 may play a major role in reactive astrocytes and glial scar formation after ischemic stroke.

7. Neurons and ASK1

After ischemic injury, neurons are harmed by excitotoxicity, acidotoxicity, MMP, nitric oxide (NO), ion imbalances, and free radicals, which results in neuronal death and cerebral damage [9092]. Inhibition of ATP synthesis in the mitochondria after ischemia depolarizes neuronal plasma membranes [92]. Additionally, the intracellular influx of excess calcium overloads via nonselective cation channels and calcium channels depolarizes neurons [90]. Membrane depolarization induces the release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate, and the increase in glutamate concentration can activate the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors [92, 93]. Calcium-permeable NMDA receptors induce further membrane depolarization, which aggravates calcium overload [92]. Ion imbalances cause excessive ROS in the intracellular system [94]. Increased NO production and free radicals can enhance BBB leakage and contribute to apoptotic signaling cascades [91].

Overexpression of ASK1 promotes apoptotic cell death, and JNK/p38 MAP kinases closely interact with this process [95, 96]. Increased ASK1 levels after cerebral ischemia also induce apoptosis, which leads to neuronal cell death and the development of infarct lesions [21]. Calcium influx activates p38 signals in the ASK1+/+ mice-derived neuron, but these p38 activations are suppressed in the ASK1−/− mice-derived neuron [10]. ASK1 is closely related to Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMK II), which is activated by calcium influx [10, 97]. It has been reported that CaMKII directly phosphorylates ASK1 at Thr 838 [10, 15, 97]. CaMKII inhibition reduces Ca2+-induced activation of ASK1 [15, 97]. NO activates ASK1, and the nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor 7-NI and the NMDA receptor antagonist MK801 reduce ASK1 activity [98]. In addition, an AMPA receptor blocker and a free radical scavenger prevent activation of ASK1 and JNK [99]. These previous studies demonstrated the neuroprotective effects from genetic knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of ASK1 after cerebral ischemia [21, 100, 101]. Neuroprotective drugs show beneficial effects by suppression of ASK1/JNK signals [102]. Based on previous studies, ASK1 may be involved in calcium influx, oxidative stress, neuronal cell death, and cerebral infarctions after ischemic stroke. (Table 1).

8. Conclusion

Ischemic stroke is a complex neurologic disorder with limited treatment options, which amplifies the need for drug development. This review focuses on cell type-specific pathomechanisms, mainly targeting platelets, endothelial cells, immune cells, astrocytes, and neurons in preclinical ischemic stroke models. We focus on ASK1 as a major target molecule in the etiology of ischemic stroke. Pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of ASK1 has been shown to provide neuroprotective effects in cerebral ischemia. Therefore, we would like to highlight the importance of ASK1 as a key target in drug development for ischemic stroke.


CNS:Central nervous system
ASK1:Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1
CBF:Cerebral blood flow
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
MAPKKK:Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase
MAP2K:Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
MAPK:Mitogen-activated protein kinase
H2O2:Hydrogen peroxide
JNK:c-Jun N-terminal kinase
vWF:von Willebrand factor
ADP:Adenosine diphosphate
TXA2:Thromboxane A2
PLA2:Phospholipase A2
ERK2:Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2
cPLA2:Cytoplasmic phospholipase A2
BBB:Blood-brain barrier
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
MCP-1:Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
VCAM-1:Vascular adhesion molecule-1
ICAM-1:Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
NETs:Neutrophil extracellular traps
TLR:Toll-like receptor
TNF-α:Transforming necrosis factor-α
TGF-β:Transforming growth factor-β
iNOS:Inducible nitric oxide synthase
GFAP:Glial fibrillary acidic protein
BDNF:Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
NGF:Nerve growth factor
NO:Nitric oxide
AMPA:α-Amino3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
CaMK II:Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
nNOS:Nitric oxide synthase.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

So Yeong Cheon, Eun Jung Kim, Jeong Min Kim, and Bon-Nyeo Koo participated in writing the manuscript, and all authors approved the final version. So Yeong Cheon and Eun Jung Kim contributed equally to this work.


This article was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIP) to Bon-Nyeo Koo (NRF-2017R1A2B4009478) and Eun Jung Kim (NRF-2017R1C1B5017506).


  1. C. Kleinschnitz, F. Fluri, and M. Schuhmann, “Animal models of ischemic stroke and their application in clinical research,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 9, pp. 3445–3454, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. L. Bi, H. J. Wang, H. Bian, and Z. T. Tian, “Identification of therapeutic targets of ischemic stroke with DNA microarray,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 4012–4019, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Durukan and T. Tatlisumak, “Acute ischemic stroke: overview of major experimental rodent models, pathophysiology, and therapy of focal cerebral ischemia,” Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 179–197, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. U. Dirnagl, C. Iadecola, and M. A. Moskowitz, “Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 391–397, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. E. Khoshnam, W. Winlow, M. Farzaneh, Y. Farbood, and H. F. Moghaddam, “Pathogenic mechanisms following ischemic stroke,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1167–1186, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. L. Mehta, N. Manhas, and R. Raghubir, “Molecular targets in cerebral ischemia for developing novel therapeutics,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 34–66, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Pekny and M. Nilsson, “Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis,” Glia, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 427–434, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. E. O'Collins, M. R. Macleod, G. A. Donnan, L. L. Horky, B. H. van der Worp, and D. W. Howells, “1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 467–477, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Matsukawa, A. Matsuzawa, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “The ASK1-MAP kinase cascades in mammalian stress response,” The Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 261–265, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Shiizaki, I. Naguro, and H. Ichijo, “Activation mechanisms of ASK1 in response to various stresses and its significance in intracellular signaling,” Advances in Biological Regulation, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 135–144, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Hayakawa, T. Hayakawa, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “Therapeutic targets in the ASK1-dependent stress signaling pathways,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 434–453, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Sekine, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “The ASK1-MAP kinase signaling in ER stress and neurodegenerative diseases,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Matsuzawa, H. Nishitoh, K. Tobiume, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “Physiological roles of ASK1-mediated signal transduction in oxidative stress- and endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis: advanced findings from ASK1 knockout mice,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 415–425, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Hayakawa, A. Matsuzawa, T. Noguchi, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “The ASK1-MAP kinase pathways in immune and stress responses,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1098–1107, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Kawarazaki, H. Ichijo, and I. Naguro, “Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 as a therapeutic target,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 651–664, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Matsuzawa and H. Ichijo, “Redox control of cell fate by MAP kinase: physiological roles of ASK1-MAP kinase pathway in stress signaling,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1780, no. 11, pp. 1325–1336, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Y. Chang, H. Nishitoh, X. Yang, H. Ichijo, and D. Baltimore, “Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by the adapter protein Daxx,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5384, pp. 1860–1863, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Yagi, I. Jikihara, M. Fukumura et al., “Rescue of ischemic brain injury by adenoviral gene transfer of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor after transient global ischemia in gerbils,” Brain Research, vol. 885, no. 2, pp. 273–282, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Y. Cheon, K. J. Cho, J. Song, and G. W. Kim, “Knockdown of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 affects ischaemia-induced astrocyte activation and glial scar formation,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 912–922, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Nagai, T. Noguchi, K. Takeda, and H. Ichijo, “Pathophysiological roles of ASK1-MAP kinase signaling pathways,” BMB Reports, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  21. H. W. Kim, K. J. Cho, S. K. Lee, and G. W. Kim, “Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (Ask1) targeted small interfering RNA on ischemic neuronal cell death,” Brain Research, vol. 1412, pp. 73–78, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. U. Naik, P. Patel, R. Derstine et al., “Ask1 regulates murine platelet granule secretion, thromboxane A2 generation, and thrombus formation,” Blood, vol. 129, no. 9, pp. 1197–1209, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Y. Cheon, E. J. Kim, J. M. Kim, E. H. Kam, B. W. Ko, and B. N. Koo, “Regulation of microglia and macrophage polarization via apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 silencing after ischemic/hypoxic injury,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 261, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Song, S. Y. Cheon, W. T. Lee, K. A. Park, and J. E. Lee, “The effect of ASK1 on vascular permeability and edema formation in cerebral ischemia,” Brain Research, vol. 1595, pp. 143–155, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. V. Murray, B. Norrving, P. A. G. Sandercock, A. Terént, J. M. Wardlaw, and P. Wester, “The molecular basis of thrombolysis and its clinical application in stroke,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 267, no. 2, pp. 191–208, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. A. Kinsella, W. O. Tobin, G. Hamilton, and D. J. H. McCabe, “Platelet activation, function, and reactivity in atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review of the literature,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 451–464, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Franchi and D. J. Angiolillo, “Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–47, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. H. Kim, K. M. Lim, and H. S. Gwak, “New anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 461–470, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Stoll, C. Kleinschnitz, and B. Nieswandt, “Molecular mechanisms of thrombus formation in ischemic stroke: novel insights and targets for treatment,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 3555–3562, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Kulkarni, S. M. Dopheide, C. L. Yap et al., “A revised model of platelet aggregation,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 783–791, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. S. Bennett and M. A. Kolodziej, “Disorders of platelet function,” Disease-a-Month, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 577–631, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. M. Wilson and J. J. Ferguson III, “Platelet-endothelial interactions in atherothrombotic disease: therapeutic implications,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 687–698, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Jin, T. M. Quinton, J. Zhang, S. E. Rittenhouse, and S. P. Kunapuli, “Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced thromboxane A2 generation in human platelets requires coordinated signaling through integrin αIIbβ3 and ADP receptors,” Blood, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 193–198, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. D. J. Church, S. Braconi, M. B. Vallotton, and U. Lang, “Protein kinase C-mediated phospholipase A2 activation, platelet-activating factor generation and prostacyclin release in spontaneously beating rat cardiomyocytes,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 477–482, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Adam, A. Kauskot, J. P. Rosa, and M. Bryckaert, “Mitogen-activated protein kinases in hemostasis and thrombosis,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 2007–2016, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Schoknecht, Y. David, and U. Heinemann, “The blood-brain barrier—gatekeeper to neuronal homeostasis: clinical implications in the setting of stroke,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 38, pp. 35–42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. A. Posada-Duque, G. E. Barreto, and G. P. Cardona-Gomez, “Protection after stroke: cellular effectors of neurovascular unit integrity,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 231, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Wallez and P. Huber, “Endothelial adherens and tight junctions in vascular homeostasis, inflammation and angiogenesis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1778, no. 3, pp. 794–809, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Amtul and J. D. Hepburn, “Protein markers of cerebrovascular disruption of neurovascular unit: immunohistochemical and imaging approaches,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 481–507, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Q. Wang, X. Tang, and M. Yenari, “The inflammatory response in stroke,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 184, no. 1-2, pp. 53–68, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Nag, J. L. Manias, and D. J. Stewart, “Pathology and new players in the pathogenesis of brain edema,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 197–217, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Jianliu and G. Rosenberg, “Matrix metalloproteinases and free radicals in cerebral ischemia,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. R. Lee and E. H. Lo, “Induction of caspase-mediated cell death by matrix metalloproteinases in cerebral endothelial cells after hypoxia-reoxygenation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 720–727, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. T. Bauer, H. F. Burgers, T. Rabie, and H. H. Marti, “Matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediates hypoxia-induced vascular leakage in the brain via tight junction rearrangement,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 837–848, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Asahi, X. Wang, T. Mori et al., “Effects of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out on the proteolysis of blood-brain barrier and white matter components after cerebral ischemia,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 7724–7732, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  46. Z. G. Zhang, L. Zhang, Q. Jiang et al., “VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 829–838, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. H. T. Zhang, P. Zhang, Y. Gao et al., “Early VEGF inhibition attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption in ischemic rat brains by regulating the expression of MMPs,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Valable, J. Montaner, A. Bellail et al., “VEGF-induced BBB permeability is associated with an MMP-9 activity increase in cerebral ischemia: both effects decreased by Ang-1,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1491–1504, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Y. Izumi, S. Kim-Mitsuyama, M. Yoshiyama et al., “Important role of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 in ischemia-induced angiogenesis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1877–1883, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Y. Cheon, K. J. Cho, S. Y. Kim, E. H. Kam, J. E. Lee, and B. N. Koo, “Blockade of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 attenuates matrix metalloproteinase 9 activity in brain endothelial cells and the subsequent apoptosis in neurons after ischemic injury,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 213, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. J. Lindsberg, O. Carpen, A. Paetau, M. L. Karjalainen-Lindsberg, and M. Kaste, “Endothelial ICAM-1 expression associated with inflammatory cell response in human ischemic stroke,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 939–945, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Zhang, M. Chopp, Z. Zhang, N. Jiang, and C. Powers, “The expression of P- and E-selectins in three models of middle cerebral artery occlusion,” Brain Research, vol. 785, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Jander, J. Pohl, C. Gillen, M. Schroeter, and G. Stoll, “Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 mRNA is expressed in immune-mediated and ischemic injury of the rat nervous system,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Z. Zheng and M. A. Yenari, “Post-ischemic inflammation: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications,” Neurological Research, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 884–892, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. M. Hallenbeck, “Significance of the inflammatory response in brain ischemia,” Mechanisms of Secondary Brain Damage in Cerebral Ischemia and Trauma, vol. 66, pp. 27–31, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Allen, P. Thornton, A. Denes et al., “Neutrophil cerebrovascular transmigration triggers rapid neurotoxicity through release of proteases associated with decondensed DNA,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 381–392, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. L. Wright, R. J. Moots, R. C. Bucknall, and S. W. Edwards, “Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases,” Rheumatology, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1618–1631, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. Huang, U. M. Upadhyay, and R. J. Tamargo, “Inflammation in stroke and focal cerebral ischemia,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 232–245, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. N. Jiang, M. Moyle, H. R. Soule, W. E. Rote, and M. Chopp, “Neutrophil inhibitory factor is neuroprotective after focal ischemia in rats,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 935–942, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y. Matsuo, H. Onodera, Y. Shiga et al., “Correlation between myeloperoxidase-quantified neutrophil accumulation and ischemic brain injury in the rat. Effects of neutrophil depletion,” Stroke, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1469–1475, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. D. Brea, T. Sobrino, P. Ramos-Cabrer, and J. Castillo, “Inflammatory and neuroimmunomodulatory changes in acute cerebral ischemia,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48–64, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. Kawabori and M. Yenari, “Inflammatory responses in brain ischemia,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1258–1277, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Vogelgesang, K. J. Becker, and A. Dressel, “Immunological consequences of ischemic stroke,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Denes, P. Thornton, N. J. Rothwell, and S. M. Allan, “Inflammation and brain injury: acute cerebral ischaemia, peripheral and central inflammation,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 708–723, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. Amantea, G. Nappi, G. Bernardi, G. Bagetta, and M. T. Corasaniti, “Post-ischemic brain damage: pathophysiology and role of inflammatory mediators,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C. Iadecola and J. Anrather, “The immunology of stroke: from mechanisms to translation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 796–808, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. T. Amadatsu, J. Morinaga, T. Kawano et al., “Macrophage-derived angiopoietin-like protein 2 exacerbates brain damage by accelerating acute inflammation after ischemia-reperfusion,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 11, article e0166285, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Lehnardt, L. Massillon, P. Follett et al., “Activation of innate immunity in the CNS triggers neurodegeneration through a Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 14, pp. 8514–8519, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. Amantea, G. Micieli, C. Tassorelli et al., “Rational modulation of the innate immune system for neuroprotection in ischemic stroke,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 147, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Zhou, Z. Yang, X. Tang, Y. Tan, X. Wu, and F. Liu, “Propofol protects against focal cerebral ischemia via inhibition of microglia-mediated proinflammatory cytokines in a rat model of experimental stroke,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 12, article e82729, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. A. Yenari, L. Xu, X. N. Tang, Y. Qiao, and R. G. Giffard, “Microglia potentiate damage to blood-brain barrier constituents: improvement by minocycline in vivo and in vitro,” Stroke, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1087–1093, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. K. Takeda, T. Noguchi, I. Naguro, and H. Ichijo, “Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 in stress and immune response,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 199–225, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. Zheng, L. Long, Y. Li et al., “A novel ASK inhibitor AGI-1067 inhibits TLR-4-mediated activation of ASK1 by preventing dissociation of thioredoxin from ASK1,” Cardiovascular Pharmacology: Open Access, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. B. C. Berk, J.-I. Abe, W. Min, J. Surapisitchat, and C. Yan, “Endothelial atheroprotective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 947, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. F. Li, S. K. Liao, C. H. Lee, Y. H. Tsai, C. C. Huang, and D. A. Quinn, “Ventilation-induced neutrophil infiltration and apoptosis depend on apoptosis signal-regulated kinase 1 pathway,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1913–1921, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. X. Guo, C. Harada, K. Namekata et al., “Regulation of the severity of neuroinflammation and demyelination by TLR‐ASK1‐p38 pathway,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 504–515, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. T. Katome, K. Namekata, X. Guo et al., “Inhibition of ASK1-p38 pathway prevents neural cell death following optic nerve injury,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 270–280, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. Becerra-Calixto and G. P. Cardona-Gomez, “The role of astrocytes in neuroprotection after brain stroke: potential in cell therapy,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 88, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. K. Takuma, A. Baba, and T. Matsuda, “Astrocyte apoptosis: implications for neuroprotection,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 111–127, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. G. A. Dienel and L. Hertz, “Astrocytic contributions to bioenergetics of cerebral ischemia,” Glia, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 362–388, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Y. Chen and R. A. Swanson, “Astrocytes and brain injury,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. L. T. Lau and A. C. Yu, “Astrocytes produce and release interleukin-1, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha and interferon-gamma following traumatic and metabolic injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 351–359, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. del Zoppo, I. Ginis, J. M. Hallenbeck, C. Iadecola, X. Wang, and G. Z. Feuerstein, “Inflammation and stroke: putative role for cytokines, adhesion molecules and iNOS in brain response to ischemia,” Brain Pathology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 95–112, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. Saito, T. Tominaga, and P. H. Chan, “Neuroprotective role of neurotrophins: relationship between nerve growth factor and apoptotic cell survival pathway after cerebral ischemia,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 268–273, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. M. C. Tiveron, E. Barboni, F. B. Pliego Rivero et al., “Selective inhibition of neurite outgrowth on mature astrocytes by Thy-1 glycoprotein,” Nature, vol. 355, no. 6362, pp. 745–748, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. L. Duan, C. W. Liu, S. W. Shen et al., “Striatal astrocytes transdifferentiate into functional mature neurons following ischemic brain injury,” Glia, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1660–1670, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. H. Song, C. F. Stevens, and F. H. Gage, “Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells,” Nature, vol. 417, no. 6884, pp. 39–44, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. K. W. Lee, X. Zhao, J. Y. Im et al., “Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 mediates MPTP toxicity and regulates glial activation,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, article e29935, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. G. Roy Choudhury, M. G. Ryou, E. Poteet et al., “Involvement of p38 MAPK in reactive astrogliosis induced by ischemic stroke,” Brain Research, vol. 1551, pp. 45–58, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Tuttolomondo, R. Di Sciacca, D. Di Raimondo et al., “Neuron protection as a therapeutic target in acute ischemic stroke,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 1317–1334, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. F. Guo, J. Z. Yu, and C. G. Ma, “Mechanisms related to neuron injury and death in cerebral hypoxic ischaemia,” Folia Neuropathologica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  92. K. P. Doyle, R. P. Simon, and M. P. Stenzel-Poore, “Mechanisms of ischemic brain damage,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 310–318, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. M. Song and S. P. Yu, “Ionic regulation of cell volume changes and cell death after ischemic stroke,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. E. Birben, U. M. Sahiner, C. Sackesen, S. Erzurum, and O. Kalayci, “Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense,” World Allergy Organization Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. H. Ichijo, E. Nishida, K. Irie et al., “Induction of apoptosis by ASK1, a mammalian MAPKKK that activates SAPK/JNK and p38 signaling pathways,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5296, pp. 90–94, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. K. Tobiume, A. Matsuzawa, T. Takahashi et al., “ASK1 is required for sustained activations of JNK/p38 MAP kinases and apoptosis,” EMBO Reports, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. K. Takeda, A. Matsuzawa, H. Nishitoh et al., “Involvement of ASK1 in Ca2+‐induced p38 MAP kinase activation,” EMBO Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. D. H. Liu, F. G. Yuan, S. Q. Hu et al., “Endogenous nitric oxide induces activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 via S-nitrosylation in rat hippocampus during cerebral ischemia-reperfusion,” Neuroscience, vol. 229, pp. 36–48, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. Q. Zhang, G. Zhang, F. Meng, and H. Tian, “Biphasic activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1-stress-activated protein kinase 1-c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase pathway is selectively mediated by Ca2+-permeable alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate receptors involving oxidative stress following brain ischemia in rat hippocampus,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. H. Hao, S. Li, H. Tang et al., “NQDI-1, an inhibitor of ASK1 attenuates acute perinatal hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury by modulating cell death,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4585–4592, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. S. An, Y. Kuang, T. Shen et al., “Brain-targeting delivery for RNAi neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 35, pp. 8949–8959, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. Q. Wang, Q. G. Zhang, D. N. Wu, X. H. Yin, and G. Y. Zhang, “Neuroprotection of selenite against ischemic brain injury through negatively regulating early activation of ASK1/JNK cascade via activation of PI3K/AKT pathway,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 So Yeong Cheon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2065 Views | 657 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.