Research Article

Effect of the Antioxidant Lipoic Acid in Aortic Phenotype in a Marfan Syndrome Mouse Model

Table 4

Evolution of echocardiographic parameters in WT and MFS mice with 6 months of age after losartan or lipoic acid treatments.

UntreatedLosartan treatmentLipoic acid treatment
WT6MFS6WT6MFS6WT6MFS6
()()()()()()

Ao/BW (mm/mg)47 ± 163 ± 3a47 ± 1e58 ± 2f42 ± 2b,c60 ± 2f,g
LVEDD (mm)3.3 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.13.2 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.2k4.4 ± 0.2a,e,i,j
LVESD (mm)1.9 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.12.4 ± 0.22.2 ± 0.1
IVST (mm)0.7 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.1c,d
PWT (mm)0.7 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1e0.6 ± 0.1e0.8 ± 0.1h,k1.0 ± 0.1a,i,j
FS (%)41 ± 143 ± 237 ± 238 ± 238 ± 340 ± 2
EF (%)78 ± 179 ± 272 ± 375 ± 274 ± 377 ± 2
E/A ratio1.9 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.1a2.5 ± 0.2b1.4 ± 0.1a,i1.8 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.1f,i

WT: wild type; MFS: Marfan syndrome; 6: 6 months of age; Ao/BW: aortic root diameter index; LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic diameters; LVESD: left ventricular end- systolic diameters; IVST: interventricular septal thickness; PWT: posterior wall thickness; FS: fractional shortening; EF: ejection fraction; E/A: E/A waves; a versus untreated WT6; b versus untreated MFS6; c versus losartan treatment MFS6; d versus losartan treatment WT6; e versus untreated MFS6; f versus untreated WT6; g versus lipoic acid treatment WT6; h versus losartan treatment WT6; i versus losartan treatment WT6; j versus losartan treatment MFS6; k versus losartan treatment MFS6.