Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Polyphenols Targeting Brain Cells Longevity, Brain's Redox Status, and Neurodegenerative Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7043213 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7043213

Roxana Braga de Andrade Teles, Tâmara Coimbra Diniz, Tiago Coimbra Costa Pinto, Raimundo Gonçalves de Oliveira Júnior, Mariana Gama e Silva, Érica Martins de Lavor, Antonio Wilton Cavalcante Fernandes, Ana Paula de Oliveira, Fernanda Pires Rodrigues de Almeida Ribeiro, Amanda Alves Marcelino da Silva, Taisy Cinthia Ferro Cavalcante, Lucindo José Quintans Júnior, Jackson Roberto Guedes da Silva Almeida, "Flavonoids as Therapeutic Agents in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Evidences", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 7043213, 21 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7043213

Flavonoids as Therapeutic Agents in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Evidences

Academic Editor: David Vauzour
Received12 Jan 2018
Accepted02 Apr 2018
Published10 May 2018


Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases are considered the most common neurodegenerative disorders, representing a major focus of neuroscience research to understanding the cellular alterations and pathophysiological mechanisms involved. Several natural products, including flavonoids, are considered able to cross the blood-brain barrier and are known for their central nervous system-related activity. Therefore, studies are being conducted with these chemical constituents to analyze their activities in slowing down the progression of neurodegenerative diseases. The present systematic review summarizes the pharmacological effects of flavonoids in animal models for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. A PRISMA model for systematic review was utilized for this search. The research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, BIREME, and Science Direct. Based on the inclusion criteria, 31 articles were selected and discussed in this review. The studies listed revealed that the main targets of action for Alzheimer’s disease therapy were reduction of reactive oxygen species and amyloid beta-protein production, while for Parkinson’s disease reduction of the cellular oxidative potential and the activation of mechanisms of neuronal death. Results showed that a variety of flavonoids is being studied and can be promising for the development of new drugs to treat neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, it was possible to verify that there is a lack of translational research and clinical evidence of these promising compounds.

1. Introduction

For many years, neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases have been a major focus of neuroscience research to understanding the cellular alterations and pathophysiological mechanisms [1]. Neurodegenerative diseases are multifactorial conditions in which many biological processes become unregularly [2] mediated by endogenous, genetic, and environmental factors [3] intimately associated with progressive brain damage [4].

The generation of free radicals and oxidative stress producing cellular impairments is often cited as an important factor in the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases [5, 6]. Beyond the oxidative stress, the neurodegenerative disease pathogenesis has some common characteristics such as neuroinflammation, abnormal accumulation of proteins, and aging [79].

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic progression characterized by loss of memory and cognitive deficits such as agnosia, aphasia, and apraxia, among others, facts that cause interference in daily life and in the individual’s work. The prevalence rate is about 7% for individuals aged 65 or more, with the risk doubling every 5 years [10].

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s. PD is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra which leads to decreased levels of dopamine in the striatum and disrupted motor control [11, 12]. Its incidence is usually comprised between 10 and 50/100,000 person-years, and its prevalence between 100 and 300/100,000 population and prevalence both increase progressively after 60 years of age [13].

Recently, studies showed considerable efforts on search of antioxidant plant-derived polyphenol compounds with neuroprotective potential for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases [14]. Dietary flavonoids have been suggested to prevent and treat neurodegenerative diseases [9].

Flavonoids are found in numerous plants, fruits, and vegetables [15] and are known as the most common phytochemicals which possess a multiple range of pharmacological effects [16]. These secondary metabolites have been described as potent antioxidant, free radical scavengers, and metal chelators [417], also presenting anticholinesterase [18], antiaging [7], neuroprotective [2, 19] and anti-inflammatory properties [5, 20, 21], and neurotrophic roles [22], ameliorating learning and memory [23], possessing potent antidepressant and antiamyloidogenic effects [16], suppressing the activation of microglia, and mediating inflammatory processes in the central nervous system (CNS) [24]. Moreover, flavonoids are able to cross the blood-brain barrier with chronic or acute administration suggesting that these compounds can feasibly have a direct effect on the brain, so this chemical compounds could be used as a prophylactic, in order to slow down the progression of diseases such as AD and PD [11].

Considering that neurodegenerative diseases represent some of the greatest challenges for basic science and clinical medicine, our study consists a systematic review of pharmacological reports involving the use of flavonoids on neurodegenerative conditions, especially AD and PD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

The present systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines for Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA statement) [25]. In this review, the specialized databases Pubmed, Web of Science, “Biblioteca Regional de Medicina” (BIREME), and Science Direct were used for the literature search in September and October 2017, using the terms “flavonoids, bioflavonoids, flavonols, flavonoid, anthocyanin, flavone, flavones, 2-phenyl-benzopyrans, 2-phenyl-chromenes, isoflavonoids or flavonones,” combined with “neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer disease or Parkinson disease.” We did not contact investigators, nor did we attempt to identify unpublished data.

2.2. Study Selection

In this step, two independent researchers (T.C.C.P. and T.C.D.) conducted the selection, and electronic search titles, selected abstracts, and full-text articles were independently reviewed by a third researcher who conducted the analysis of the full text. Disagreements on study inclusion/exclusion were resolved with a consensus between all investigators. The following inclusion criteria were applied: studies with flavonoids acting on CNS in animal models. Studies were excluded according to the following exclusion criteria: review articles, meta-analyses, abstracts, conference proceedings, editorials/letters, case reports, studies in humans, and published over 5 years. Additional papers were included in our study after analyses of all references from the selected articles.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data were extracted by one reviewer using standardized forms and were checked by a second reviewer. Extracted information included the substance, animal models, doses and concentrations, and evaluated parameters.

2.4. Methodological Quality Assessment

The risk of bias and quality of preclinical evidences were assessed using a checklist adapted from Hooijmans et al. [26] and Siqueira-Lima et al. [27]. This analysis allowed evaluating the methodological quality of the selected manuscripts regarding the outcome measurements, randomization of treatment allocation, blinded drug administration, blinded outcome assessment, appropriate description of the doses and routes of administration used, and appropriately reported statistical analysis of data. Studies that reported randomization of animals, blinding, outcome measurements, and statistical analysis were considered to be of higher methodological quality.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Study Selection

The primary search identified 2456 articles, including 347 from PubMed, 1338 from BIREME, 595 from Web of Science, and 176 from Science Direct. Among these, 1157 documents were published more than five years ago and were therefore excluded from the review. In addition, 305 manuscripts were indexed in two or more databases and were considered only once, resulting in 994 eligible articles. After an initial screening of titles and abstracts, followed by a full text analysis, 31 articles were included in this systematic review, while the reminder () was excluded since they did not meet the inclusion criteria. A flowchart illustrating the progressive study selection and numbers at each stage is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Characteristics of Included Studies

In general, the studies were conducted by research groups from several countries, mainly China (10 reports, 32.3%), Republic of Korea (07 reports, 22.6%), and India (05 reports, 16.1%). These findings reflect the contribution of Oriental medicine in the search for new drugs from natural products. In fact, Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) are major traditional treatment systems used not only in India and China, but also in several countries [28, 29]. These systems have provided important information for the development of new pharmaceutical products based on plant extracts or even small molecules of original chemical structure and with innovative mechanisms of action. Their by-products have been applied in a variety of diseases, including central nervous system disorders such as AD and PD [30, 31].

Chinese herbal medicines have been clinically used to treat AD for a long time with significant effectiveness [32]. Recently, Jiang et al. [33] have described the progress of TCM in the treatment of AD, highlighting traditional Chinese medicinal herbs as potential AChE inhibitors for anti-AD approach. Among bioactive molecules, numerous flavonoids have been cited, including quercetin, apigenin, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, catechin, epigallocatechin, epicatechin-3-O-gallate, icariin, procyanidin, and silibinin. Similarly, TCM has also been reported for the treatment of PD. Several Chinese plant derivatives have been shown to be promising neuroprotective agents in PD, including resveratrol, curcumin, and ginsenoside [34, 35]. In this context, such information justifies the significant number of Chinese authorship studies included in this review.

Although most of the manuscripts was focused on AD (20 reports), a relevant number of studies involving experimental protocols in PD were also found (13 reports). Many studies have evaluated important behavioral parameters related to memory, motor functions, and cognitive activities of animals. However, biochemical and molecular targets were also verified by colorimetric and enzymatic assays; histological, biochemical, and hematological analyses; and western blot, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence techniques. The parameters evaluated and main outcomes are summarized in Table 1.

Authors, year, countrySubstance(s)DiseaseAnimals, (strain/sex) n (per group)Doses, route, administration, periodPreclinical modelsEvaluated parameters

Wei et al., 2013 [36], China(2S)-5, 2, 5-trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone (TMF)Alzheimer’sMice (Kunming/NR) ()4 or 8 mg/kg, i.p., 1 weekD-galactose(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test)(i) Colorimetric assay: GSH and GSSG
(ii) ELISA: AP-1 and BDNF
(iii) Western blot: CREB and p-CREB
Mani et al., 2013 [37], IndiaNaringinAlzheimer’sRats (W/M), 100 mg/kg, p.o., 21 daysDeltamethrin(i) NR(i) Agarose gel electrophoresis: DNA fragmentation
(ii) Biochemical: LDH, CK, AChE, SOD, CAT, GPx, GR, GSH, vitamin C, vitamin E, and lipid peroxidation level
(iii) Histological analysis
(iv) Native gel electrophoresis: SOD and CAT
Nakajima et al., 2013 [38], JapanNobiletinAlzheimer’sRats (SAMP8/M) 10 or 50 mg/kg, i.p., unclearSenescence-accelerated prone mouse (SAMP8) model(i) Nonspatial memory (novel object test)
(ii) Contextual and auditory fear memory (fear conditioning test)
(iii) Emotional reactivity, anxiety (elevated plus maze test)
(i) Biochemical: MDA, protein carbonyl level, SOD, and GPx
(ii) HPLC: GSH and GSSG
(iii) Real-time RT-PCR: GPx1 and GPx4
(iv) Western blot: Aβ1–42, tau, p-tau, GPx1, and GPx4
Moghbelinejad et al., 2014 [39], IranRutinAlzheimer’sRats (W/M) 100 mg/kg, i.p., 3 weeksAmyloid beta (Aβ1–42)(i) Memory retrieval (passive avoidance apparatus test)(i) Biochemical: MDA and total SH groups
(ii) Real-time RT-PCR: BDNF, ERK1, ERK2, and CREB1
Li et al., 2014 [40], GermanyHesperidinAlzheimer’sMice (APP/PS1–21/M), 100 mg/kg, p.o., NRTransgenic APP/PS1–21 mouse model(ii) Nesting behavior (nest building assay)
(iii) Social behavior, degree of interaction (social interaction assay)
(i) Double immunostaining
(ii) Immunohistochemistry: Aβ, GFAP, TGF-β1, and Alzheimer precursor protein A4
Javed et al., 2014 [41], IndiaHesperidinAlzheimer’sMice (S/M), or 100 and 200 mg/kg, i.p, 15 daysStreptozotocin(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test)(i) Biochemical: TBARS, GSH, AChE, ganglioside, and phospholipids
(ii) Immunohistochemistry: GFAP, NF-κB, iNOS, and COX-2
Walker et al., 2015 [42], USAEpigallocatechin gallateAlzheimer’sMice (TgCRND8 (Tg) and wild type (nTg)/M and F), , , or 50 mg/kg, p.o., 4 monthsTgCRND8 amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice(i) Acquisition experience (nest building)
(ii) Locomotor activity and exploratory (open field test)
(iii) Novelty-seeking and anxiety-like behaviors (light-dark box)
(iii) Learning (Barnes maze)
(i) ELISA: Aβ1–42
Kou et al., 2016 [43], ChinaDihydromyricetinAlzheimer’sRats (SD/M), 100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o., 6 weeksD-galactose(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test)(i) Histological analysis
(ii) Real-time PCR: miR-34a
(iii) SA-β-gal staining
(iv) Western blot: caspase-3, Bcl-2, SIRT1, p53, p21, Atg7, LC3-II/LC3-I, GFAP, and mTOR
Ali et al., 2016 [44], Republic of KoreaAnthocyanins and anthocyanin-loadedPEG-AuNPsAlzheimer’sMice (C57BL/M), 12 μg/g/day, p.o., 14 daysAmyloid beta (Aβ1–42)(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze and Y-maze tests)(i) Immunohistochemical Nissl and FJB staining
(ii) Immunofluorescence
(iii) Western blot: Aβ, BACE-1, SNAP23, synaptophysin, p-AMPARs, p-PI3K, p-Akt, p-GSK3β, p-tau, PSD95, caspase-3, Cyt c, Bax, Bcl2, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-(PARP-1)
Ramalingayya et al., 2016 [45], IndiaNaringin and RutinAlzheimer’sRats (W/F), 50 and 100 mg/kg, p.o., 15 daysDonepezil and scopolamine(i) Locomotor activity and time spent in the center zone (open field test)
(ii) Nonspatial memory (object recognition task)
(i) Hematological
Chen et al., 2016 [46], ChinaQuercetinAlzheimer’sMice (C57BL/6J/M), NR30 mg/kg, p.o., NRCognitive disorders per high-fat diet (HFD)(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze test)(i) Immunohistochemisty: p-PERK, p-IRE1α, NLRP3, and p-tau
(ii) Light microscopy: CA1
(iii) Western blot: AMPK, p-AMPK, IRE1α, p-IRE1α, eIF-2α, p-IF-2α, TXNIP, NLRP3, GSK-3β, p-GSK-3βser9, tau, and p-tau
Song et al., 2017 [47], ChinaSilibininAlzheimer’sRats (SD/M), NR25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o., 28 daysAmyloid beta (Aβ25–35)(i) Anxiety and locomotor activity (Elevated plus maze test)
(ii) Spatial learning and memory ability (Morris water maze test)
(iii) Learning and memory (novel object-recognition test)
(iv) Memory (memory flexibility test)
(i) Biochemical: MDA and GSH
(ii) ELISA: IL-1β, IL-4
(iii) Flow cytometric analysis
(iv) Transmission electron microscopy
(v) Western blot: NF-κB, COX-2, iNOS, p53, and p-p53
Moreno et al., 2017 [48], SpainQuercetin and quercetin-loadednanoparticlesAlzheimer’sRats (SAMP8/M), Quercetin (25 mg/kg, p.o., 2 months)
Quercetin-loaded nanoparticles (25 mg/kg every 48 hours, p.o., 2 months)
Senescence-accelerated prone mouse (SAMP8) model(i) Locomotor activity (open field test)
(ii) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(ii) Exploratory motivation (marble burying test)
(iii) Spatial memory and both the working and reference memory functions (Morris water maze test)
(i) Western blot: GFAP and CD11b
Godoy et al., 2016 [49], ChileQuercetinAlzheimer’sRats (B6.129S7-Sod2tm1Leb/J/NR), NR50 mg/kg, two times a week, p.o., 4 weeksAmyloid beta (Aβ25–35)(i) NR(i) Electrophysiology
Palle and Neerati, 2016 [50], IndiaQuercetin and quercetin nanoparticlesAlzheimer’sRats (W/M), 30 mg/kg, i.p., 8 daysScopolamine(i) Conditioning, avoidance responses (conditioned avoidance test)
(ii) Learning, memory (rectangular maze test)
(i) Biochemical: MDA, GPx, AChE, and CAT
(ii) Histological analysis
Ahmad et al., 2016 [51], Republic of KoreaFisetinAlzheimer’sMice (C57BL/6N/M), 20 mg/kg, i.p., 2 weeksAmyloid beta Aβ1–42(i) Spatial memory and both the working and reference memory functions (Morris water maze test)(i) FJB staining
(ii) Immunofluorescence: Aβ (B4), synaptophysin, PSD95, p-tau, GFAP, and Iba-1
(iii) Immunohistochemistry: caspase-3
(iv) Western blot: caspase-9, SYN, p-AMPAR1, p-CREB, p-CAMKII, p-PI3K, and p-Akt
Rehman et al., 2017 [52], Republic of KoreaAnthocyaninsAlzheimer’sRats (SD/M), 100 mg/kg, i.p., 7 weeksD-galactose(i) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze and Y-maze tests)(i) Biochemical: ROS, MDA
(ii) Immunofluorescence: Aβ, 8-OxoG, p-JNK, GFAP, and Iba-1
(iii) Western blot: Aβ, BACE-1, RAGE, 8-OxoG, TNF-α, iNOS, p-JNK, Bax, Bcl2, PARP-1, syntaxin, synaptophysin, SNAP-23, p-CREB, GFAP, and Iba-1
Kim et al., 2017 [53], Republic of KoreaAnthocyanins alone and anthocyanin-loaded poly (ethylene glycol) gold nanoparticles (PEG-AuNPs)Alzheimer’sMice (C57BL/6N/M), 10 mg/kg, i.v., 14 daysAmyloid β (Aβ1–42)(i) NR(i) ICP-AES
(ii) Immunofluorescence: GFAP, Iba-1, and RAGE
(iii) Nissl staining
(iv) TEM
(v) Western blot: Aβ, BACE-1, GSK3β, CDK5, tau, NF-κB, iNOS, p-JNK, Bcl2, Bax, Cyt c, FJB, COX-2, NOS3, IL-1β, and TNF-α
Sharma et al., 2016 [54], IndiaQuercetinAlzheimer’s and Parkinson’sRats (W/M), 10 mg/kg, p.o., 12 weeksAluminum(i) NR(i) Biochemical: ROS, MnSOD
(ii) DNA isolation for DNA fragmentation
(iii) Electron microscopy analysis
(iv) Histological analysis
(v) Immunohistochemistry: MnSOD, c-c, and caspase-3
(vi) RT-PCR: MnSOD;
(vi) Western blot: MnSOD, Cyt c, Bax, Bcl-2, p53, and caspase-3
Jeong et al., 2015 [55], Republic of KoreaNaringinEpilepsy, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’sMice (C57BL/6/M) NR80 mg/kg, i.p., 7 daysKainic acid(i) NR(i) Immunohistochemical: NeuN and Iba-1
(ii) Light microscopy: CA1
(iii) Western blot: LC3B and TNFα
Lee et al., 2014 [56], Republic of KoreaBaicaleinParkinson’sMice (C57B/6/M), 1 and 10 mg/kg (i.p.), 7 daysMPTP(i) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)(i) DAB immunostaining: TH
(ii) Double label immunostaining: TH, GFAP, and Iba-1
(iii) Histological analysis
(iv) Western blot: GFAP
Antunes et al., 2014 [57], BrazilHesperidinParkinson’sMice (C57 BL/6/F), 50 mg/kg, p.o., 28 days6-OHDA(i) Depression (Tail-suspension test)
(ii) Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze)
(iii) Locomotor activity and time spent in the center zone (open field test)
(i) Biochemical: GSH, ROS, TRAP, SOD, CAT, GR, GPx, GST, DA, DOPAC, and HVA
Lou et al., 2014 [58], ChinaNaringeninParkinson’sMice (C57BL/6/F), 70 mg/kg, p.o., 4 days6-OHDA(i) Rotational behavior—numbers of rotations (apomorphine-induced circling behavior)(i) HPLC-MS: DA, DOPAC, and HVA
(ii) Immunohistochemistry: TH
(iii) Western blot: Nrf2, HO-1, GCLM, GCLC, Lamin A, cleaved caspase-3, p-JNK, JNK, p-p38, and p38
Wang et al., 2015 [59], ChinaTanshinone IParkinson’sMice (C57BL/6/M), NR5, 10 mg/kg, p.o., 7 daysMPTP(i) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)(i) Biochemical: ALT, AST, and ALP
(ii) ELISA: TNF-α and IL-10
(iii) HPLC: DA, DOPAC, HVA, and MPP+
(iv) Immunohistochemistry: TH and Iba-1
Chen et al., 2015 [60], ChinaSilibilinParkinson’sRats (M and F), NR25 and 50 mg/kg, p.o. in second dayIncreased neonatal iron intake(i) Locomotor activity and time spent in the center zone (open field test)
(ii) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(i) Biochemical: MDA and GSH
(ii) HPLC-ECD: DA and 5-HT
Mu et al., 2016 [61], ChinaQuercetinParkinson’sRats (SD/M), NR100, 200, and 400 mg/kg, i.g., NR6-OHDA(i) Rotational behavior—numbers of rotations (apomorphine-induced circling behavior)(i) HPLC-ECD: DA, DOPAC, HVA, 5-HT, and 5-HIAA
Lee et al., 2015 [62], KoreaSilibininParkinson’sMice (C57B/6/M), or 121 or 10 mg/kg, i.p., 5 daysMPTP(i) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)(i) DAB immunostaining: TH
(ii) Double label immunostaining: GFAP and Iba-1
Hu et al., 2016 [63], ChinaBaicaleinParkinson’sMice (C57BL/6/M), NR100 mg/kg, i.p., 7 weeks to 12 weeksRotenone(i) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(ii) Motor dysfunctions (grid test)
(i) HPLC: DA, DOPAC, and HVA
(ii) Immunofluorescence: α-syn, TH, and ChAT
(iii) Real-time PCR: α-syn
(iv) TEM
(v) Western blot: α-synuclein and GAPDH
Zhang et al., 2017 [64], ChinaBaicaleinParkinson’sRats (SD/M), , or 10100, 200, and 400 mg/kg, p.o., 28 daysRotenone(i) Locomotor activity (open field test)
(ii) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(iii) The inclined plane assessment
(i) Immunohistochemistry: TH
(ii) TEM
(iii) TUNEL staining
(iv) Western blot: caspase-3, PGC-1α, NRF-1, and TFAM
Goes et al., 2017 [65], BrazilChrysinParkinson’sMice (C57B/6J/M), 10 mg/kg, p.o., 28 days6-OHDA(i) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(ii) Rotational behavior—numbers of rotations (apomorphine-induced circling behavior)
(i) ELISA: IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, NF-κB, S100B, BDNF, GDNF, and NGF
(ii) HPLC: DA, DOPAC, and HVA
(iii) TRAP and TAR
(iv) Immunohistochemistry: TH+ neurons
Ay et al., 2017 [66], USAQuercetin and quercetin-containingformulation (QB3C)Parkinson’sMice (MitoPark and C57BL/6/M/F), or Quercetin (25 mg/kg, p.o., 6 weeks)
QB3C comprising quercetin (175 mg/kg, p.o., 8 weeks)
MitoPark transgenic mouse models(i) Locomotor activity (open field test)
(ii) Motor coordination and balance (rotarod test)
(i) HPLC: DA, DOPAC, and HVA
(ii) DAB immunostaining: TH

Animals: SD: Sprague-Dawley; W: Wistar; S: Swiss; SAMP8: senescence-accelerated prone mouse 8; NR: not reported. Parameters assessed: DPPH: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; MDA: malonaldehyde; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; AAPH: 2,2-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride; FeSO4: ferrous sulphate; 6-OHDA: 6-hydroxydopamine; MPTP: 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine; FJB: Fluoro-Jade B; GSH: reduced glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; AP-1: activator protein-1; BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CREB: cAMP response element-binding protein; p-CREB: phosphorylated; SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; GR: glutathione reductase; GSH: reduced glutathione; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; CK: creatine kinase; AChE: acetylcholinesterase; MDA: malondialdehyde; p-tau: phosphorylated tau; TGF-β1: transforming growth factor beta 1; SYN: synaptophysin; p-AMPAR1: phospho-α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors; p-CRE: phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein; p-CAMKII: phosphorylated calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; p-PI3K: phosphorylated phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase; p-Akt: phosphorylated protein kinase B; GFAP: antiglial fibrillary acidic protein; Iba-1: anti-ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1; 8-OxoG: 8-oxoguanine; p-JNK: C-jun N-terminal kinase; ICP-AES: inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; Aβ: brain expression levels of amyloid beta; BACE-1: beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1; GSK3β: glycogen synthase kinase-3β; CDK5: cyclin-dependent kinase 5; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; COX-2; NOS3; IL-1β; TNF-α; p-JNK: phospho-JNK; Bcl2; Bax; Cyt c: cytochrome c; FJB. RAGE receptor for advanced glycation end products; MnSOD: mitochondrial superoxide dismutase; NeuN: neuronal nuclei; LC3B: microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 isoform B; MS: mass spectrometry; DA: dopamine; DOPAC: dihydroxyphenylacetic acid; HVA: homovanillic acid; HO-1: hemeoxygenase; Nrf2: nuclear factor E2-related factor 2; GCLC: glutathione cysteine ligase regulatory subunit; GCLM: glutathione cysteine ligase modulatory subunit; JNK: c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MPP+: 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; ECD: equipped with electro chemical detector; TRAP: total reactive antioxidant potential; TAR: total antioxidant reactivity; S100B: calcium-binding protein B; GDNF: glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; NGF: nerve growth factor; DAB: diaminobenzidine; SA-β-Gal: senescence-associated β-galactosidase.
3.3. Methodological Quality

Concerning the methodological quality, all reports were carefully evaluated through a standard checklist. As shown in Figure 2, only one of the included articles reported sample size calculations. Only 48.4% of the studies reported randomization of animals for outcome assessment. Allocation of the animals in different treated groups was adequately reported by 64.5% of the studies. Blinding of investigators during animal treatment and outcome evaluation was found only in 16.1 and 12.9% of the studies, respectively. The remaining studies did not report any blindness strategy.

Although these parameters are most often applied in clinical trials, the need of randomization, blinding, allocation concealment, and attempt to minimize variation has been discussed and strongly recommended for preclinical studies, especially when the experimental protocols involve the evaluation of behavioral parameters. Since human studies are often justified based on results from animal studies, it is extremely important to plan preclinical protocols that follow the same rigor of clinical trials. In addition to reducing the risk of bias, this research strategy avoids obtaining distinct results between the two study designs (preclinical and clinical) [6769]. In this context, the methodological quality of the studies included in our review was considered low to moderate, which limits the interpretation of the results.

3.4. Animal Models in Alzheimer’s Disease

AD is a gradual and highly prevalent neurodegenerative disease and has as pathological neuroinflammation characteristic, neuronal loss, and impairment of cognitive function [47, 70]. AD is classified into two subtypes: early-onset familial outcome, related to specific mutations in genes that code for presenilin 1 (PS1), presenilin 2 (PS2), and amyloid precursor protein (APP), and late-onset sporadic disease, associated with mutations in genes that code for apolipoprotein E (ApoE), which include several environmental and genetic risk factors, yet unknown [71].

Among the pathological features, there is an amyloid dense core of β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of an abnormally phosphorylated form of the tau protein [41]. The deposition of amyloid β peptide culminates in pathological processes of synaptic and cognitive dysfunction and neuronal death [47, 70].

Animal models recapitulate pathological feature characteristic of AD in addition to several phenotypic traits simulate of the disease, acting as therapeutic targets and in their preclinical validation. According to Laurijssens et al. [72], animal models used in AD can be divided into three categories: natural (dog, mouse lemur, Octodon, and Rhesus monkey), genetic (APP mice, Tg2576 mice, and PSAPP mice), and interventional models (rat, intrahippocampal amyloid infusion model).

In the selected studies, interventional models were the most used [39, 44, 47, 49, 51, 53]. In fact, interventional models would generally be better at identifying symptomatic or corrective treatment. These models can provide important insights such as the Aβ pharmacochemical substance-induced model and the understanding of inflammation, neurotoxicity, neurodegeneration and synaptic function, specific brain lesions, and neuronal mechanism underlying memory dysfunction [72, 73].

3.5. Animal Models in Parkinson’s Disease

PD is a progressive neurodegenerative disease defined by the selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway [62]. A disruption of synaptic activity may represent the primary event in PD pathogenesis. Recently, studies on the neurodegeneration mechanisms in PD have revealed pathological features and important genetic influences. Common pathogenic pathways are present in PD, such as proteostatic deficits, mitochondrial dysfunctions, oxidative stress, and inflammation process [74, 75].

As well as knowledge of new pathophysiological mechanisms involved, the development of experimental models in PD has also advanced. As in other neurodegenerative disorders, PD experimental protocols have become increasingly sensitive and accurate, allowing not only the evaluation of new drugs, but also the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that play an important role in the disease [74]. However, it is important to note that animal models still cannot express the complexity of human pathological hallmarks and clinical features, each one has specific limitations, and its choice must be conditioned to what best responds to the research objective [74, 76].

The papers selected in this review reported animal models to evaluate pathogenic mechanisms, motor and nonmotor manifestations of PD by administering different neurotoxic agents such as 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) [57, 58, 61, 65], 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) [56, 59, 62], or rotenone [63, 64]. The most cited animal model in the selected studies was 6-OHDA. It exerts toxic effects on catecholaminergic neurons and is characterized as a neurotoxin structural analogue of catecholamines, dopamine, and noradrenaline. It is toxic at the peripheral and central levels although its toxicity in the CNS is only possible through direct stereotaxic surgery. Its neurotoxicity involves the accumulation of toxin in the catecholaminergic neurons triggering the alteration of the cellular homeostasis and neuronal damages. 6-OHDA oxidation by MAO-A generates H2O2 which, besides being highly cytotoxic, triggers the production of oxygen radicals [7779]. Another model included the alteration of dopaminergic neurotransmission by drugs, such as reserpine [80], or by genetic manipulation to study the progression of dopaminergic cell degeneration and motor signs [81].

The models that use toxins are widely used and act in the replication of most pathological and phenotypic features of the disease. However, as a limitation of this tool, the loss of approximately 70 to 80% of the dopaminergic neurons in the acutely induced neurodegeneration is difficult to achieve, making it difficult to explore dysfunction and progression. In view of the early synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration that are inherent to the pathology, new models are necessary to help the early stages of the disease, as well as new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of PD [76].

3.6. Flavonoids in the AD and PD Treatment

The plants use adaptation systems in extreme conditions, such as high temperatures, lighting, and water scarcity, which culminate in oxidative damages leading to excessive production of free radicals. Among the main natural antioxidant agents, we highlight carotenoids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and phenolic derivatives that act in several mechanisms against oxidative stress [82].

Flavonoids are a class of secondary metabolites that always attract the attention of the pharmaceutical industry due to their versatility in therapeutic properties. Additionally, they are part of the human diet due to their abundance in vegetables, fruits, seeds, and beverages such as coffee, tea, and red wine, as well as in medicinal herbs. More than 9000 different flavonoids have been identified and are divided into six subclasses based on their molecular structure. These subclasses include flavonols (rutin, quercetin), flavanols (catechin, epicatechin, and epigallocatechin), isoflavones (genistein, daidzein, glycetin, and formanantine), anthocyanidins (cyanidin, malvidine, and delphinidine), flavanones (hesperetin, naringenin), and flavones (apigenin, luteolin) [83].

Studies indicate that phenolic compounds play an important role in prevention and treatment of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases. Among the neuroprotective actions of dietary flavonoids, we highlighted their potential to modulate cell signaling pathways, protect neurons against oxidative stress, inhibit nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, subsequently decrease reactive oxygen species production, and downregulate proinflammatory transcription factors, as well as its ability to suppress neuroinflammation through reduction of the release of cytokines [84].

In our systematic review, quercetin, rutin, silibinin, naringin, baicalein, hesperidin, and anthocyanins (Figure 3) were the most studied flavonoids for PD and AD treatment. In this sense, we describe below the pharmacological effects of these compounds to better understand the role of flavonoids in the treatment of AD and PD (Figures 4 and 5, resp.). In general, they act to improve the progression of the disease, but in the included reports, there is no consensus of dose, treatment duration, and route of administration of these flavonoids. However, the researchers argue that they have good bioavailability.

3.6.1. Quercetin

Quercetin (3,3,4,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone) is a flavonoid found naturally in plants and among other foods such as onions, apples, broccoli, and red wine. It presents pharmacological, antioxidant, cardioprotective, and antiapoptotic properties [85]. Some studies relate their neuroprotective action in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases like AD and PD [86]. Sharma et al. [54] evaluated the effect of quercetin manipulation in young rats treated with aluminum on isolated mitochondrial hippocampus. A decrease in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was observed; however, there were no significant changes in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase activity (MnSOD) [54].

Expression of the apoptotic markers in the mitochondrial fraction revealed levels of reduced Bax and increased Bcl. When the cytosolic fractions were evaluated, the expression of Bcl-2 and Cyt c was decreased, reducing the activation of caspase-3 suggesting that the administration of quercetin inhibits apoptosis. Quercetin prevents the release of Cyt c and subsequent activation of caspase-3 and decreases p53 expression. The histopathological analysis revealed no significant degeneration [54]. Thus, the study performed by Sharma et al. [54] has shown that quercetin attenuates aluminum-induced mitochondrial turgor, loss of ridge, and chromatin condensation.

Environmental factors such as hyperlipidemic diet consumption may increase the inflammatory response in the brain by increasing the release of cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 [87]. Studies have shown that the action of these cytokines promotes neuronal death by activating the apoptotic cascade [88]. Quercetin is also involved in the activity of AMPK, an energy sensor, which has the ability to prevent the phosphorylation of tau protein [89]. Tau protein facilitates the polymerization of tubulin in the cell, resulting in microtubule formation. In the neurofibrillary tangles, the aggregation of Tau is by irreversible phosphorylation suffered by this protein. This prevents its normal function and at the same time facilitates its aggregation in fibrils, preventing the normal functioning of the neuron [90].

Chen et al. [46] evaluated whether the activation of AMPK through the action of quercetin is able to block or not the phosphorylation of tau protein in animals submitted to a hyperlipidic diet. It was seen that quercetin was able to promote downregulation in blood levels of TNF-α and IL-6. And it especially prevented tau phosphorylation by restoring AMPK activation. Additionally, quercetin inhibits GSK3β enzyme activity by dephosphorylation, attenuates the expression of P-PERK and P-IRE1α (membrane sensors present in the endoplasmic reticulum whose activation indicates oxidative stress), and normalizes the inflammation of NLRP3 (inflammation promoter). Improvement in learning and spatial memory was also seen [46].

In a study that evaluated the manipulation of quercetin nanoparticle facilitating oral absorption, it was seen that there was no change in coordination or locomotor activity [48]. The nanoparticle treatment of quercetin is capable of promoting reversal of abnormal exploratory behavior by improving learning and memory assessed by the Morris water maze test. In addition, the expression of an inflammatory marker GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) in the hippocampus was significantly reduced, which was not observed with free quercetin. On the other hand, the expression of CD11b, a member of the complement cascade, whose function is adhesion and leukocyte migration in response to inflammation, did not present significant results. Therefore, manipulation of quercetin-loaded nanoparticles has been shown to increase the concentration of this flavonoid in the brain of animals [48].

In the study performed by Palle and Neerati [50], the protective effect of quercetin nanoparticles compared to free quercetin against the induction of spatial memory deficiency promoted by scopolamine in animals was evaluated. This work highlighted a relevant role of quercetin nanoparticles on oxidative stress, revealing that these nanoparticles are able to significantly reduce malonaldehyde levels and increase levels of glutathione peroxidase and catalase in the brain. In observing the effect of treatment of quercetin nanoparticles on the pharmacological action of scopolamine, it has been seen that they are able to reduce the induction of elevation of scopolamine-promoted anticholinesterase activity. In addition, treatment with quercetin nanoparticles significantly reduces morphological abnormalities revealing the cellular protective effect of this flavonoid [50].

It is believed that changes in mitochondrial activity are the main cause of the occurrence of neurodegenerative disorders because they are the main producers of ROS [76]. Godoy et al. [49] have observed that quercetin exhibits antioxidant activity protecting against neuronal toxicity induced by hydrogen peroxide, although this protection has been partial in rat hippocampal neurons. Animals treated with quercetin caused a reduction in ROS levels, recovered normal mitochondrial morphology, and prevented mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons that were manipulated with hydrogen peroxide [49].

Of all the works selected in this review, only one demonstrated the role of quercetin on Parkinson’s disease. Mu et al. [61] investigated the antitremor effect of quercetin in the experimental model of PD induced by the application of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). The study demonstrated that injection of 6-OHDA into the striatum induces marked decrease in serotonin levels and its metabolite 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA). Therefore, it was seen that these animals when treated with quercetin had attenuated serotonin levels, which may be related to an improvement in the tremor level of these animals [61].

Quercetin seems to act by inhibiting the cell oxidative potential, in addition to exhibiting anti-inflammatory action. Both events may minimize the progression of PD and AD.

3.6.2. Silibinin

Silibinin, (2R,3R)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-[(2R,3R)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2- (hydroxymethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-6-yl]-2,3-dihydro-4H -chromen-4-one, is a flavonoid derived from milk thistle of the species Silybum marianum [91]. Recent research investigated the effects of silibinin on the inflammatory process, oxidative stress, and autophagy [92, 93]. Following this subject, Song et al. [47] investigated the effect of silibinin treatment on locomotor activity, learning, and spatial memory. In addition to the concentration of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-4, and the levels of the antioxidant enzyme (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA), a lipid peroxidation marker, which occurs in response to excess free radicals the NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B), a regulator of the immune response released in different situations among these oxidative stress, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), i-NOS (nitric oxide synthase) are products of glial cells contributing to an inflammatory response in the brain. P-53, a tumor suppressor agent, is a critical component of the acute stress cell response, and p-p53 is its phosphorylated component. It has been seen that silibinin decreases anxiety-like behavior, reverses memory damage and spatial learning caused by the treatment of Aβ25-35, and improves the ability to recognize new objects and memory flexibility. Silibinin is able to suppress the inflammatory response and improve oxidative stress levels in the hippocampus, in addition to suppressing the expression of p-p53 and p-53 [47].

Chen et al. [60] analyzed the levels of glutathione and malondialdehyde in animals that underwent neonatal manipulation with carbonyl iron dose and its consequence in young adult and old animals as well as treatment with silibinin. It was first seen that iron consumption resulted in abnormal behavior of coordination and locomotor activity only in the old animals. Also in these animals, iron in the neonatal period also increased levels of malondialdehyde and reduced those of glutathione enzyme. Treatment with silibinin in aging animal’s decrease dopamine depletion in the striatum improving motor behavior was also able to significantly reduce the content of MDA and increase the content of GSH in the nervous system. It is concluded that silibinin acts as a neuroprotective factor preventing oxidative stress; one of the consequences of neurodegenerative diseases, among them, is Parkinson’s disease [60].

Using a model of dopaminergic neuronal death caused by the pharmacological agent MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine), a neurotoxin capable of inducing Parkinsonism, Lee et al. [62] investigated the neuroprotective mechanism of sibilinin. Treatment with silibinin prevented motor dysfunction in the pharmacological parkinsonism (MPTP) model, as well as neuronal loss (TH-positive neurons) in the striatum and substantia nigra. Silibinin effectively protects dopaminergic neurons in the striatum and black matter of neuronal death caused by MPTP, but does not impede the inflammatory response, since it does not act effectively on glial cell activation or modulation of oxidative stress. The latter result differs from the previous work probably due to the dose difference used in the present study, from 1 to 10 mg/kg body weight. This demonstrates that the neuroprotective action of silibinin is dose dependent [62].

It can be concluded that silibinin is a flavonoid with a neuroprotective characteristic especially acting on the inflammatory response and on the components of oxidative stress and neuronal death, thus having a potential therapeutic agent in neurodegenerative diseases.

In summary, silibinin is a flavonoid with a neuroprotective potential, especially acting on the inflammatory response, on components of oxidative stress, and on neuronal death.

3.6.3. Anthocyanins

Anthocyanins are polyphenolic flavonoids widely found in fruits, flowers, grains, and vegetables [94]. This flavonoid has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptosis properties, in addition to improving memory and cognition [95]. They are characterized by the basic flavylium core (2-phenylbenzopyryl cation) consisting of two aromatic rings joined by a three-carbon unit and condensed by an oxygen. The anthocyanin molecule consists of two or three portions, an aglycone (anthocyanidin), a group of sugars, and often a group of organic acids [96].

There are several evidences that relate the role of this flavonoid in cognition and memory, being characterized with a neuroprotective factor in the dementias among them AD. Alim et al. [44] observed in genetically modified mice (Aβ1–42 mouse model of AD) the ability of anthocyanin particles and (ethylene glycol) gold nanoparticles (PEG-AuNPs) (polyphenolic flavonoid anthocyanins for conjugation to PEG-AuNPs) to improve memory loss and synaptic deficit and neurodegeneration. The behavioral assessment showed that the latency times of there quired to reach the hidden platform in were shorter, increased the number of platform crossings and time spent in the target quadrant during the probe test in mice treated with anthocyanins and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs. Furthermore, anthocyanins and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs increased the spontaneous alteration behavior. Anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs reduced the levels of Aβ (β-amyloid protein), BACE-1 (a beta-secretase, a key enzyme in the formation of the β-amyloid protein), and APP (protein precursor antiamyloid). This demonstrates a potential action of this flavonoid on the production of beta-amyloid protein. The administration of free anthocyanins and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs mitigated the effect of Aβ1–42 and increased the expression levels of synaptophysin, PSD95, and SNAP23; these molecules are related to the synapse process between the neurons. Anthocyanins and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs increased the phosphorylation of GluR1 at Ser845 and increased the expression level of p-CREB (Ser133), which can improve the memory process. The administration of free anthocyanins and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs increased phosphorylation and elevated the levels of p-PI3K and p-Aktat Ser473, increased the level of p-GSK3β at Ser9, and reduced the level of p-tau at Ser413 and Ser404, which consequently may reduce the level of formation of fibrillar components. The results showed a reduction of the ratio of Bax/Bcl2 and Cyt c, but anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs were more effective than free anthocyanin. A reduction in the caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, and PARP-1 levels in the hippocampus was also observed, and these results demonstrate the neuroprotective action of this flavonoid. Finally, an increase in the number of surviving neurons and a reduction in the Aβ1–42-induced-degenerated neuronal cells in the hippocampus and cortex were seen [44].

In the work of Kim et al. [53], the therapeutic efficacy of anthocyanins alone and anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs in the Aβ1–42-induced AD mouse model was also investigated. It was observed that the anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs can cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the Aβ-injected mice. Furthermore, the anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs reduced β-amyloid and BACE-1 expressions and also prevented tau hyperphosphorylation GSK-3β/CDK5 pathway. Anthocyanin-loaded PEG-AuNPs also reduced Aβ1–42-induced microglia and astrocyte cell activation [53].

In another study, the anthocyanins inhibited activated astrocytes and various inflammatory markers including p-NF-κB, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the hippocampus and cortex regions of D-gal-treated rats [52].

Anthocyanins are able to inhibit the cascade of myeloid beta-protein production and to decrease synaptogenesis and neuronal death. They also induce microglial activation in areas important to the process of memory as hippocampus and cortex.

3.6.4. Naringin

Naringin (4,5,7-trihydroxyflavanone 7-rhamnoglucoside) belongs to a family of C6-C3-C6 polyphenol compounds and exists in grapefruit and other citrus fruits. This flavonoid has been shown to possess numerous biological benefits such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory [97]. Preclinical models of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disorders, diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative disorders, osteoporosis, and rheumatological disorders were established in a few studies of naringin in vitro and in vivo [98]. Recently, studies demonstrated a neuroprotective effect of naringin by modulation of endogenous biomarkers and downregulation of free radical and cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in streptozotocin-induced painful diabetic neuropathy [99]. Mani et al. [37] investigated the effect of naringin against deltamethrin-induced neurotoxicity in male Wistar rats. The result showed that treatment leads to a significant revival of the oxidative status, which confirms the protective effect of naringin.

Behavioral analysis of the effect of naringin on memory deficit in a pharmacological model (donepezil and scopolamine) in animals has demonstrated a significant difference in the locomotor activity and confirmed that naringin has no confounding influence on locomotion on improving the potential for episodic memory, in the familiarization trial no preference or discrimination toward any of the objects used. The flavonoid reversed the time-induced episodic memory deficit increase in novel object exploration time compared with familiar object and improvement in recognition and discriminative indices. Therefore, naringin reversed the scopolamine-induced short-term episodic memory deficits and improved discrimination and recognition [45].

In a model of animal excitotoxicity by treatment with kainic acid (KA), a potent agonist of excitatory amino acids, especially glutamate, the prevention effect of autophagy and neuroinflammation of naringin was investigated [55]. Excess KA becomes a neurotoxin leading to neuronal death due to excitotoxicity. The naringin treatment significantly decreased the frequency of chronic spontaneous seizures in KA-treated mice compared with KA alone suggesting that naringin might have beneficial properties as an antiepileptic agent. Additionally, treatment with naringin attenuated the loss of hippocampal neurons in the KA-treated CA1 region, suggesting that naringin might have a property of reducing autophagic stress, which could be involved in neuronal cell death. In addition, the naringin treatment attenuated an increase in TNF-α within Iba1-positive microglia in the KA-treated hippocampus characteristic of diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s [55].

The naringenin (5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chroman-4-one) is a flavonoid of citrus fruits, predominantly found in grapefruit. The antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects of the naringenin have already been demonstrated [100]. Lou et al. [58] investigated the effect of naringenin on PD through the pharmacological parkinsonism model (6-OHDA). Naringenin treatment resulted in an increase in nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) protein (regulatory factor of the expression of antioxidant protein genes) levels and subsequent activation of antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway genes. Additionally, the pretreatment with naringenin protected mice against 6-OHDA-associated ROS damage in striatum. The 6-OHDA-induced loss of TH-positive neurons in the striatum and SNC were remarkably attenuated by naringenin treatment. Therefore, there was a profound reduction in striatal DA and its metabolites after 6-OHDA lesioning that was attenuated by naringenin treatment, which produced a significant elevation in striatal DA and the metabolites DOPAC (dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) and HVA (homovanillic acid). Furthermore, apomorphine-induced asymmetrical rotations contralateral to the 6-OHDA injection site were significantly reduced by naringenin treatment as compared to mice lesioned with 6-OHDA [58].

Narigin seems to act especially through the inhibition of oxidative cellular stress, which reflects in reduction of neuronal loss (autophagic stress). It is known that oxidative stress is a strong mechanism of neuroinflammation and has an important consequence for neurodegenerative diseases.

3.6.5. Baicalein

Baicalein (5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone) is a flavonoid originally isolated from the roots of Scutellaria baicalensis and Scutellaria lateriflora [101]. It has neuroprotective properties against PD and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [102]. Hu et al. [63] noted that baicalein treatment attenuated the motor deficits, in addition to increase in striatal neurotransmitters: DA (dopamine), DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid), and HVA (homovanillic acid). Analysis of fluorescence intensity by microscopy and the amount of α-syn in enteric nervous system was also lower and increased of the in the number of TH-positive neurons. There was a decrease of α-synoligomers, not monomers, in ileum, thoracic spinal cord, and midbrain; baicalein had no effect on α-syn mRNA expression. Therefore, it can be inferred that this flavonoid can prevent the progression of α-syn accumulation in PD, by inhibiting the formation of α-syn oligomers [63].

When investigating the therapeutic effects of baicalein on rotenone-induced PD rats and exploring whether the neuroprotective potential practices by baicalein were through intervening in mitochondrial function and mitobiogenesis, it was found that baicalein partially ameliorated the motor dysfunction and increased the number of TH+ cells in the substance nigra (SN) in rotenone-induced PD rats [64]. This flavonoid also protected neurons in the SN against rotenone-induced apoptosis. The baicalein ameliorated the dysfunction of mitochondrial complex I in the ventral midbrain that was damaged by rotenone [64]. In addition, the administration of baicalein increased the protein levels of PGC-1α (a regulator of mitochondrial mitobiogenesis), NRF-1 (transcription factor that regulates the expression of antioxidant proteins), and TFAM (mitochondrial transcription factor) in the ventral midbrain, which may improve the brain’s response to oxidative stress and consequent neuronal loss observed in Parkinson’s disease [64].

Lee et al. [56], through a model of pharmacological parkinsonism in animals (MPTP administration), observed that the, in low doses, baicalein improves motor ability and prevented the loss of dopaminergic neurons caused by MPTP. In addition, microglial activation and astrocyte activation were reduced in the animal with pretreated baicalein PD. This study reveals the importance of astrocyte activation for the occurrence of the neurodegenerative process. It has also been reported that baicalein reduces MPP (a toxic molecule that interferes with oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria) that is capable of inducing the activation of NF-κB, ERK (protein kinase intracellular signaling), and JNK (c-jun N-terminal kinase) in the astrocyte leading to a mechanism of neuroinflammation considered as a potent inducer of PD [56].

These studies taken together reveal the neuroprotective action of baicalein especially on mitochondrial activity and activation of glial cells. Both processes are recognized with potential mechanisms capable of increasing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. This flavonoid proved to be effective as a therapeutic strategy especially against PD disease.

3.6.6. Hesperidin

Hesperidin, (2S)-5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromen-7-yl 6-O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside, is the major flavanone glycoside present in citrus fruits. This compound has an important neuroprotective property and radical scavenging properties related to diverse neuronal insults, such as ischemia [103], stroke [104], and oxidative-induced damage [105], as well as pathology related to AD [106] and Huntington’s disease [107].

Nones et al. [108] showed that hesperidin promotes neuronal differentiation and survival and also enhances the neuroprotective capacity of astrocytes, by inducing them to secrete soluble factors involved in neuronal survival in vitro.

Li et al. [40] investigated the potential therapeutic effect of hesperidin on behavioral dysfunction, Aβ deposition, and neuroinflammation in the transgenic APP/PS1–21 mouse model. In this research, the treatment with hesperidin caused a decrease in the nesting ability and social interaction. Furthermore, the improvement of amyloid beta accumulation and APP expression, with reduction of microglial activation, suggests that hesperidin might be a potential candidate for the treatment of AD or even of other neurodegenerative diseases.

An investigation into the anti-inflammatory potential, antioxidants, and protective effects of hesperidin was performed by Javed et al. [41] using the mouse model of sporadic dementia of Alzheimer’s type (SDAT). In this model, researchers have shown that hesperidin can be used for the treatment of cognitive disorders because of its neuronal cell death modulation by inhibiting the overexpression of inflammatory markers like nuclear factor κB, coupled with the inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, and glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive astrocytes.

Antunes et al. [57] evaluate the role of the flavonoid hesperidin in an animal model of PD induced by 6-OHDA and demonstrated that hesperidin (50 mg/kg) treatment was effective in preventing memory impairment and depression-like behavior with reduction in glutathione peroxidase and catalase activity, total reactive antioxidant potential, and the dopamine and its metabolite levels in the striatum of aged mice.

Matias et al. [109] described hesperidin as a new drug able to improve memory in healthy adult mice by two main mechanisms: by inducing synapse formation and function between hippocampal and cortical neurons. In addition, other mechanisms enhance the synaptogenic ability of cortical astrocytes by means of increased secretion of transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) by these cells.

Hesperidin appears to present a neuroprotective role through its action on glial cells, microglia, and astrocytes, promoting reduction of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. In addition, it may induce synapse formation in brain regions involved with memory and decision-making.

3.6.7. Rutin

Rutin (2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-4H-chromen-3-yl 6-O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside) is a glycone of quercetin with a flavonol structure. This substance modifies the cognitive and various behavioral symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases due to the ability of rutin and/or its metabolites to cross the blood-brain barrier; this way causes effects on the various cellular functions under pathological conditions [110, 111].

Some reports have demonstrated that rutin scavenges superoxide radicals, increases antioxidant enzymatic activity in vitro, reduces lipid peroxidation and cytokine production, and prevents cognitive deficits including CNS injuries in rat models [112, 113].

In recent studies, Rodrigues et al. [114] investigate the effect of treatment with rutin after induction of focal cortical ischemia and results that shown that rutin is a putative candidate to treat stroke. Few studies have evaluated the treatment with rutin in models of global and focal brain ischemia, showing positive effects [115].

According to Hhan et al. [116], similar to other flavonoids, the main expected mechanisms of action of rutin are its anti-inflammatory and antioxidative potentials. Thus, anti-inflammatory action of rutin was demonstrated with reduction of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in a model of PD.

Moghbelinejada et al. [39] investigated the possible effects of rutin on MAPK and BDNF gene expression and memory retrieval in β-amyloid-injected rats. Their results demonstrated improved memory impairment caused by injection of Aβ in rats through activation of MAPK and BDNF, as also reduced oxidative stress in the hippocampus of rats by reducing MDA level and increasing thiol content in the hippocampus. Further studies are necessary to clarify the effects and molecular mechanisms of this flavonoid.

Rutin has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory roles; its mechanism of action is not yet completely elucidated but may be related to the MAPK pathway and reduction of nitric oxide synthase activation.

4. Conclusion and Perspective

This systematic review suggests that the flavonoids reported have a potential for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases such as PD and AD and are considered drug candidates in the future clinical research. The studies listed in this review revealed that the main targets of action for Alzheimer’s disease therapy were reduction of reactive oxygen species and amyloid beta-protein production. In Parkinson’s disease, reduction of the cellular oxidative potential and mechanisms of neuronal death are often involved in the neuroprotective potential of flavonoids.

It was observed that flavonoids had been studied using various in vivo animal models, including the evaluation of its mechanism of action and effects on the molecular level. However, it is essential to improve the rigor of study design and data in view of the fact that most of the included studies presented low to moderate methodological quality, which limits the interpretation of the results and the continuity of the studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian agencies CNPq, CAPES, FACEPE, and State University of Feira de Santana (UEFS).


  1. V. M. Mani, S. Asha, and A. M. M. Sadiq, “Pyrethroid deltamethrin-induced developmental neurodegenerative cerebral injury and ameliorating effect of dietary glycoside naringin in male wistar rats,” Biomedicine & Aging Pathology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Gomes, R. C. Pimpão, S. Fortalezas et al., “Chemical characterization and bioactivity of phytochemicals from Iberian endemic Santolina semidentata and strategies for ex situ propagation,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 74, pp. 505–513, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Relja, “Pathophysiology and classification of neurodegenerative diseases,” Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 3, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  4. C. M. Nday, E. Halevas, G. E. Jackson, and A. Salifoglou, “Quercetin encapsulation in modified silica nanoparticles: potential use against Cu(II)-induced oxidative stress in neurodegeneration,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 145, pp. 51–64, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Ahmed, M. M. Khan, H. Javed et al., “Amelioration of cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration by catechin hydrate in rat model of streptozotocin-induced experimental dementia of Alzheimer’s type,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 492–501, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Q. Zhang, J. J. Zhao, J. Xu, F. Feng, and W. Qu, “Medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of the genus Uncaria,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 173, pp. 48–80, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Lin, B. Ni, H. Lin et al., “Traditional usages, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Polygonum multiflorum Thunb.: a review,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 159, pp. 158–183, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. M. Khan, D. Kempuraj, R. Thangavel, and A. Zaheer, “Protection of MPTP-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration by pycnogenol,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 379–388, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Grosso, P. Valentão, F. Ferreres, and P. Andrade, “The use of flavonoids in central nervous system disorders,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 37, pp. 4694–4719, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. C. Brown, A. H. Lockwood, and B. R. Sonawane, “Neurodegenerative diseases: an overview of environmental risk factors,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 113, no. 9, pp. 1250–1256, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Elbaz, L. Carcaillon, S. Kab, and F. Moisan, “Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease,” Revue Neurologique, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. O. B. Tysnes and A. Storstein, “Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 901–905, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Pringsheim, N. Jette, A. Frolkis, and T. D. Steeves, “The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Movement Disorders, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 1583–1590, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. A. Kelsey, H. M. Wilkins, and D. A. Linseman, “Nutraceutical antioxidants as novel neuroprotective agents,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 7792–7814, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. M. Liu, J. Q. Ma, S. S. Liu, G. H. Zheng, Z. J. Feng, and J. M. Sun, “Proanthocyanidins improves lead-induced cognitive impairments by blocking endoplasmic reticulum stress and nuclear factor-κB-mediated inflammatory pathways in rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 72, pp. 295–302, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. F. Nabavi, N. Braidy, S. Habtemariam et al., “Neuroprotective effects of chrysin: from chemistry to medicine,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 90, pp. 224–231, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. K. Li, Z. T. Jiang, R. Li, and J. Tan, “Investigation of antioxidant activities and free radical scavenging of flavonoids in leaves of Polygonum multiflorum Thumb,” China Food Additives, vol. 2, pp. 69–74, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. B. C. Adedayo, G. Oboh, S. Oyeleye, I. I. Ejakpovi, A. A. Boligon, and M. L. Athayde, “Blanching alters the phenolic constituents and in vitro antioxidant and anticholinesterases properties of fireweed (Crassocephalum crepidioides),” Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 419–426, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Prakash and G. Sudhandiran, “Dietary flavonoid fisetin regulates aluminium chloride-induced neuronal apoptosis in cortex and hippocampus of mice brain,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1527–1539, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Q. Li, H. Zhao, M. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Chronic green tea catechins administration prevents oxidative stress-related brain aging in C57BL/6J mice,” Brain Research, vol. 1353, pp. 28–35, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Ashafaq, S. S. Raza, M. M. Khan et al., “Catechin hydrate ameliorates redox imbalance and limits inflammatory response in focal cerebral ischemia,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1747–1760, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Matsuzaki, K. Miyazaki, S. Sakai et al., “Nobiletin, a citrus flavonoid with neurotrophic action, augments protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor subunit, GluR1, and the postsynaptic receptor response to glutamate in murine hippocampus,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 578, no. 2-3, pp. 194–200, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. H. Kim, S. Kim, S. J. Jeon et al., “Tanshinone I enhances learning and memory, and ameliorates memory impairment in mice via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase signalling pathway,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 1131–1142, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. P. Spencer, K. Vafeiadou, R. J. Williams, and D. Vauzour, “Neuroinflammation: modulation by flavonoids and mechanisms of action,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 83–97, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, article e1000097, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. R. Hooijmans, M. M. Rovers, R. B. Vries, M. Leenaars, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga, and M. W. Langendam, “SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 43, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. S. Siqueira-Lima, J. C. Silva, J. S. S. Quintans et al., “Natural products assessed in animal models for orofacial pain – a systematic review,” Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 124–134, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Balachandran and R. Govindarajan, “Ayurvedic drug discovery,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1631–1652, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. Y. Wu, J. J. Hou, H. L. Long, W.-Z. Yang, J. Liang, and D.-A. Guo, “TCM-based new drug discovery and development in China,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 241–250, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Z. L. Ren and P. P. Zuo, “Neural regeneration: role of traditional Chinese medicine in neurological diseases treatment,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 139–145, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Z. Wang, H. Wan, J. Li, H. Zhang, and M. Tian, “Molecular imaging in traditional Chinese medicine therapy for neurological diseases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 608430, 11 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Su, Q. Wang, C. Wang, K. Chan, Y. Sun, and H. Kuang, “The treatment of Alzheimer’s disease using Chinese medicinal plants: from disease models to potential clinical applications,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 403–423, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Jiang, H. Gao, and G. Turdu, “Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs as potential AChE inhibitors for anti-Alzheimer’s disease: a review,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 75, pp. 50–61, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. F. Kum, S. S. Durairajan, Z. X. Bian et al., “Treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease with traditional Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot clinical study,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 724353, 8 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. Fu, W. Zhuang, S. Zhou, and X. Wang, “Plant-derived neuroprotective agents in Parkinson’s disease,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1189–1202, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  36. H. Wei, G. Wu, J. Chen et al., “(2S)-5, 2, 5-trihydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone, a natural product from Abacopterispenangiana, presents neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1686–1694, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. V. M. Mani, S. Asha, and A. M. M. Sadiq, “Pyrethroid deltamethrin-induced developmental neurodegenerative cerebral injury and ameliorating effect of dietary glycoside naringin in male wistar rats,” Biomedicine & Aging Pathology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Nakajima, Y. Aoyama, T. T. Nguyen et al., “Nobiletin, a citrus flavonoid, ameliorates cognitive impairment, oxidative burden, and hyperphosphorylation of tau in senescence-accelerated mouse,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 250, pp. 351–360, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Moghbelinejada, M. Nassiri-Asla, T. N. Farivar et al., “Rutin activates the MAPK pathway and BDNF gene expression on beta-amyloid induced neurotoxicity in rats,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 224, no. 1, pp. 108–113, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. Li, C. Zug, H. Qu, H. Schluesener, and Z. Zhang, “Hesperidin ameliorates behavioral impairments and neuropathology of transgenic APP/PS1 mice,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 281, no. 15, pp. 32–42, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Javed, K. Vaibhav, M. E. Ahmed et al., “Effect of hesperidin on neurobehavioral, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and lipid alteration in intracerebroventricular streptozotocin induced cognitive impairment in mice,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 348, no. 1-2, pp. 51–59, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. M. Walker, D. Klakotskaia, D. Ajit et al., “Beneficial effects of dietary EGCG and voluntary exercise on behavior in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 561–572, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. X. Kou, X. Liu, X. Chen, J. Li, X. Yang, and N. Chen, “Ampelopsin attenuates brain aging of D-gal-induced rats through miR-34a-mediated SIRT1/mTOR signal pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 46, pp. 74484–74495, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Alim, M. J. Kim, S. U. Rehman, A. Ahmad, and M. O. Kim, “Anthocyanin-loaded PEG-gold nanoparticles enhanced the neuroprotection of anthocyanins in an Aβ1-42 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 6490–6506, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. V. Ramalingayya, M. Nampoothiri, P. G. Nayak et al., “Naringin and Rutin alleviates episodic memory deficits in two differentially challenged object recognition tasks,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 12, no. 45, pp. 63–70, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Chen, X. Deng, N. Liu et al., “Quercetin attenuates tau hyperphosphorylation and improves cognitive disorder via suppression of ER stress in a manner dependent on AMPK pathway,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 22, pp. 463–476, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Song, B. Zhou, L. Cui et al., “Silibinin ameliorates Aβ25-35-induced memory deficits in rats by modulating autophagy and attenuating neuroinflammation as well as oxidative stress,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1073–1083, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. C. G. E. I. Moreno, E. Puerta, J. E. Suárez-Santiago, N. S. Santos-Magalhães, M. J. Ramirez, and J. M. Irache, “Effect of the oral administration of nanoencapsulated quercetin on a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 517, no. 1-2, pp. 50–57, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. A. Godoy, C. B. Lindsay, R. A. Quintanilla, F. J. Carvajal, W. Cerpa, and N. C. Inestrosa, “Quercetin exerts differential neuroprotective effects against H2O2 and Aβ aggregates in hippocampal neurons: the role of mitochondria,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 7116–7128, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Palle and P. Neerati, “Quercetin nanoparticles attenuates scopolamine induced spatial memory deficits and pathological damages in rats,” Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Ahmad, T. Ali, H. Y. Park, H. Badshah, S. U. Rehman, and M. O. Kim, “Neuroprotective effect of Fisetin against amyloid-beta-induced cognitive/synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in adult mice,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 2269–2285, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. U. Rehman, S. A. Shah, T. Ali, J. I. Chung, and M. O. Kim, “Anthocyanins reversed D-galactose-induced oxidative stress and neuroinflammation mediated cognitive impairment in adult rats,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 255–271, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. J. Kim, S. U. Rehman, F. U. Amin, and M. O. Kim, “Enhanced neuroprotection of anthocyanin-loaded PEG-gold nanoparticles against Aβ1-42-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration via the NF-KB/JNK/GSK3β signaling pathway,” Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2533–2544, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. R. Sharma, W. Y. Wani, A. Sunkaria et al., “Quercetin attenuates neuronal death against aluminum-induced neurodegeneration in the rat hippocampus,” Neuroscience, vol. 324, pp. 163–176, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. H. Jeong, U. J. Jung, and S. R. Kim, “Naringin attenuates autophagic stress and neuroinflammation in kainic acid-treated hippocampus in vivo,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 354326, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. E. Lee, H. R. Park, S. T. Ji, Y. Lee, and J. Lee, “Baicalein attenuates astroglial activation in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridine-induced Parkinson’s disease model by downregulating the activations of nuclear factor-κB, ERK, and JNK,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 130–139, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. S. Antunes, A. T. R. Goes, S. P. Boeira, M. Prigol, and C. R. Jesse, “Protective effect of hesperidin in a model of Parkinson’s disease induced by 6-hydroxydopamine in aged mice,” Nutrition, vol. 30, no. 11-12, pp. 1415–1422, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. Lou, X. Jing, X. Wei, H. Shi, D. Ren, and X. Zhang, “Naringenin protects against 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity via activation of the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 79, pp. 380–388, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Wang, H. Jing, H. Yang et al., “Tanshinone I selectively suppresses pro-inflammatory genes expression in activated microglia and prevents nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 164, pp. 247–255, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. Chen, X. Wang, M. Wang et al., “Behavioral and neurochemical deficits in aging rats with increased neonatal iron intake: silibinin’s neuroprotection by maintaining redox balance,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 206, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. X. Mu, X. Yuan, L. D. Du, G. R. He, and G. H. Du, “Antagonism of quercetin against tremor induced by unilateral striatal lesion of 6-OHDA in rats,” Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. Lee, H. R. Park, H. J. Chun, and J. Lee, “Silibinin prevents dopaminergic neuronal loss in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease via mitochondrial stabilization,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 755–765, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Q. Hu, V. N. Uversky, M. Huang et al., “Baicalein inhibits α-synuclein oligomer formation and prevents progression of α-synuclein accumulation in a rotenone mouse model of Parkinson’s disease,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1862, no. 10, pp. 1883–1890, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. X. Zhang, L. Du, W. Zhang, Y. Yang, Q. Zhou, and G. Du, “Therapeutic effects of baicalein on rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease through protecting mitochondrial function and biogenesis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 9968, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. T. R. Goes, C. R. Jesse, M. S. Antunes et al., “Protective role of chrysin on 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurodegeneration a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: involvement of neuroinflammation and neurotrophins,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 279, pp. 111–120, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Ay, J. Luo, M. Langley et al., “Molecular mechanisms underlying protective effects of quercetin against mitochondrial dysfunction and progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration in cell culture and MitoPark transgenic mouse models of Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 766–782, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. A. Hirst, J. Howick, J. K. Aronson et al., “The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 6, article e98856, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. P. J. Karanicolas, F. Farrokhyar, and M. Bhandari, “Blinding: who, what, when, why, how?” Canadian Journal of Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 345–348, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  69. J. E. Aguilar-Nascimento, “Fundamental steps in experimental design for animal studies,” Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 2-3, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Tapia-Rojas, C. B. Lindsay, C. Montecinos-Oliva et al., “Is L-methionine a trigger factor for Alzheimer’s-like neurodegeneration?: changes in Aβ oligomers, tau phosphorylation, synaptic proteins, Wnt signaling and behavioral impairment in wild-type mice,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 62, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. J. C. Corrêa-Velloso, M. C. B. Gonçalves, Y. Naaldijk, A. Oliveira-Giacomelli, M. M. Pillat, and H. Ulrich, “Pathophysiology in the comorbidity of bipolar disorder and Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacological and stem cell approaches,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 80, Part A, pp. 34–53, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. Laurijssens, F. Aujard, and A. Rahman, “Animal models of Alzheimer’s disease and drug development,” Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. e319–e327, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. A. Castañé, D. E. Theobald, and T. W. Robbins, “Selective lesions of the dorsomedial striatum impair serial spatial reversal learning in rats,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 74–83, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. V. Francardo, “Modeling Parkinson’s disease and treatment complications in rodents: potentials and pitfalls of the current options,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 17, pp. 31471–31477, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. N. Hauser and T. G. Hastings, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease and monogenic parkinsonism,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 51, pp. 35–42, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. P. Imbriani, G. Sciamanna, M. Santoro, T. Schirinzi, and A. Pisani, “Promising rodent models in Parkinson’s disease,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 46, pp. S10–S14, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. G. Cohen, “Oxy-radical toxicity in catecholamine neurons,” Neurotoxicology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  78. J. Luthman, A. Fredriksson, E. Sundstrom, G. Jonsson, and T. Archer, “Selective lesion of central dopamine or noradrenaline neuron systems in the neonatal rat: motor behavior and monoamine alterations at adult stage,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 267–277, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. Wąsik, D. Polak, I. Romańska, J. Michaluk, and L. Antkiewicz-Michaluk, “The impact of 1MeTIQ on the dopaminergic system function in the 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1205–1213, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. E. Shireen, S. Pervez, M. Masroor et al., “Reversal of haloperidol induced motor deficits in rats exposed to repeated immobilization stress,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1459–1466, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  81. A. Quiroga-Varela, E. Aguilar, E. Iglesias, J. A. Obeso, and C. Marin, “Short- and long-term effects induced by repeated 6-OHDA intraventricular administration: a new progressive and bilateral rodent model of Parkinson’s disease,” Neuroscience, vol. 361, pp. 144–156, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. E. Kelly, P. Vyas, and J. T. Weber, “Biochemical properties and neuroprotective effects of compounds in various species of berries,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 26, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. L. F. Ferreyra, S. P. Rius, and P. Casati, “Flavonoids: biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 3, p. 222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. I. Solanki, P. Parihar, and M. S. Parihar, “Neurodegenerative diseases: from available treatments to prospective herbal therapy,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 95, pp. 100–108, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Y. Li, J. Yao, C. Han et al., “Quercetin, inflammation and immunity,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 167, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. Spagnuolo, S. Moccia, and G. L. Russo, “Anti-inflammatory effects of flavonoids in neurodegenerative disorders,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 17, pp. 30683–30689, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. C. Morris and C. C. Tangney, “Dietary fat composition and dementia risk,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 35, pp. S59–S64, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. E. Bahar, J. Y. Kim, and Y. Yoon, “Quercetin attenuates manganese-induced neuroinflammation by alleviating oxidative stress through regulation of apoptosis, iNOS/NF-κB and HO-1/Nrf2 pathways,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 9, p. 1989, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. D. M. Wang, S. Q. Li, W. L. Wu, X. Y. Zhu, Y. Wang, and H. Y. Yuan, “Effects of long-term treatment with quercetin on cognition and mitochondrial function in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1533–1543, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. C. Li and J. Gotz, “Tau-based therapies in neurodegeneration: opportunities and challenges,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 863–883, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. Z. Švagera, N. Škottová, P. Váňa et al., “Plasma lipoproteins in transport of silibinin, an antioxidant flavonolignan from Silybum marianum,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 524–530, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. R. Lim, C. J. Morwood, G. Barker, and M. Lappas, “Effect of silibinin in reducing inflammatory pathways in in vitro and in vivo models of infection-induced preterm birth,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 3, article e92505, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. M. Wang, Y. J. Li, Y. Ding et al., “Silibinin prevents autophagic cell death upon oxidative stress in cortical neurons and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 932–943, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. S. Y. Wang, C. T. Chen, W. Sciarappa, C. Y. Wang, and M. J. Camp, “Fruit quality, antioxidant capacity, and flavonoid content of organically and conventionally grown blueberries,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 14, pp. 5788–5794, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. A. N. Winter, E. K. Ross, H. M. Wilkins et al., “An anthocyanin-enriched extract from strawberries delays disease onset and extends survival in the hSOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” Nutritional Neuroscience, vol. 9, pp. 1–13, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. A. Smeriglio, D. Barreca, E. Bellocco, and D. Trombetta, “Chemistry, pharmacology and health benefits of anthocyanins,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1265–1286, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. S. Qin, Q. Chen, H. Wu et al., “Effects of naringin on learning and memory dysfunction induced by gp120 in rats,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 124, pp. 164–171, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Bharti, N. Rani, B. Krishnamurthy, and D. S. Arya, “Preclinical evidence for the pharmacological actions of naringin: a review,” Planta Medica, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 437–451, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. D. Kandhare, K. S. Raygude, P. Ghosh, A. E. Ghule, and S. L. Bodhankar, “Neuroprotective effect of naringin by modulation of endogenous biomarkers in streptozotocin induced painful diabetic neuropathy,” Fitoterapia, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 650–659, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. M. F. Manchope, C. Calixto-Campos, L. Coelho-Silva et al., “Naringenin inhibits superoxide anion-induced inflammatory pain: role of oxidative stress, cytokines, Nrf-2 and the NO−cGMP−PKG−KATP channel signaling pathway,” PloS One, vol. 11, no. 4, article e0153015, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. T. Makino, A. Hishida, Y. Goda, and H. Mizukami, “Comparison of the major flavonoid content of S. Baicalensis, S. Lateriflora, and their commercial products,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 294–299, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. F. Q. Li, T. Wang, Z. Pei, B. Liu, and J. S. Hong, “Inhibition of microglial activation by the herbal flavonoid baicalein attenuates inflammation-mediated degeneration of dopaminergic neurons,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 331–347, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. V. Gaur and A. Kumar, “Hesperidin pre-treatment attenuates NO-mediated cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury and memory dysfunction,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 635–648, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S. S. Raza, M. M. Khan, A. Ahmad et al., “Hesperidin ameliorates functional and histological outcome and reduces neuroinflammation in experimental stroke,” Brain Research, vol. 1420, pp. 93–105, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. M. Chen, H. Gu, Y. Ye et al., “Protective effects of hesperidin against oxidative stress of tert-butyl hydroperoxide in human hepatocytes,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2980–2987, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. S. M. Huang, S. Y. Tsai, J. A. Lin, C. H. Wu, and G. C. Yen, “Cytoprotective effects of hesperetin and hesperidin against amyloid β-induced impairment of glucose transport through downregulation of neuronal autophagy,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 601–609, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. E. T. Menze, M. G. Tadros, A. M. Abdel-Tawab, and A. E. Khalifa, “Potential neuroprotective effects of hesperidin on 3-nitropropionic acid-induced neurotoxicity in rats,” Neurotoxicology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1265–1275, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. J. Nones, A. P. Costa, R. B. Leal, F. C. A. Gomes, and A. G. Trentin, “The flavonoids hesperidin and rutin promote neural crest cell survival,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 350, no. 2, pp. 305–315, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. I. Matias, L. P. Diniz, A. Buosi, G. Neves, J. Stipursky, and F. C. A. Gomes, “Flavonoid hesperidin induces synapse formation and improves memory performance through the astrocytic TGF-β1,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 184, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. W. Arjumand, A. Seth, and S. Sultana, “Rutin attenuates cisplatin induced renal inflammation and apoptosis by reducing NFκB, TNF-α and caspase-3 expression in wistar rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2013–2021, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. S. Habtemariam, “Rutin as a natural therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: insights into its mechanisms of action,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 860–873, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. H. Javed, M. M. Khan, A. Ahmad et al., “Rutin prevents cognitive impairments by ameliorating oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in rat model of sporadic dementia of Alzheimer type,” Neuroscience, vol. 210, pp. 340–352, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. P. X. Xu, S. W. Wang, X. L. Yu et al., “Rutin improves spatial memory in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice by reducing Aβ oligomer level and attenuating oxidative stress and neuroinflammation,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 264, pp. 173–180, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. A. M. G. Rodrigues, F. S. Marcilio, M. F. Muzitano, and A. Giraldi-Guimarães, “Therapeutic potential of treatment with the flavonoid rutin after cortical focal ischemia in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1503, pp. 53–61, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. M. Khan, A. Ahmad, T. Ishrat et al., “Rutin protects the neural damage induced by transient focal ischemia in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1292, pp. 123–135, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. M. M. Khan, S. S. Raza, H. Javed et al., “Rutin protects dopaminergic neurons from oxidative stress in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Roxana Braga de Andrade Teles et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.