Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Using Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Cancer Treatment

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3873928 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3873928

Plasma Medicine: Applications of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma in Dermatology

Academic Editor: Nagendra K. Kaushik
Received24 May 2019
Accepted12 Aug 2019
Published03 Sep 2019

Abstract

The ability to produce cold plasma at atmospheric pressure conditions was the basis for the rapid growth of plasma-related application areas in biomedicine. Plasma comprises a multitude of active components such as charged particles, electric current, UV radiation, and reactive gas species which can act synergistically. Anti-itch, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, tissue-stimulating, blood flow-enhancing, and proapoptotic effects were demonstrated in in vivo and in vitro experiments, and until now, no resistance of pathogens against plasma treatment was observed. The combination of the different active agents and their broad range of positive effects on various diseases, especially easily accessible skin diseases, renders plasma quite attractive for applications in medicine. For medical applications, two different types of cold plasma appear suitable: indirect (plasma jet) and direct (dielectric barrier discharge—DBD) plasma sources. The DBD device PlasmaDerm® VU-2010 (CINOGY Technologies GmbH), the atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) kINPen® MED (INP Greifswald/neoplas tools GmbH), and the SteriPlas (Adtec Ltd., London, United Kingdom) are CE-certified as a medical product to treat chronic wounds in humans and showed efficacy and a good tolerability. Recently, the use of plasma in cancer research and oncology is of particular interest. Plasma has been shown to induce proapoptotic effects more efficiently in tumor cells compared with the benign counterparts, leads to cellular senescence, and—as shown in vivo—reduces skin tumors. To this end, a world-wide first Leibniz professorship for plasmabiotechnology in dermatology has been introduced to establish a scientific network for the investigation of the efficacy and safety of cold atmospheric plasma in dermatooncology. Hence, plasma medicine especially in dermatology holds great promise.

1. Plasma Medicine

Plasma medicine emerged in the last decade as an exciting new field of research at the interface between physics and the life sciences. Physical plasma can be generated by adding energy (heat or electromagnetic fields) to a neutral gas until the ionized gaseous substance becomes increasingly electrically conductive. Plasmas emit electromagnetic radiation, predominately UV radiation and visible light, and contain excited gas molecules, positively and negatively charged ions, free electrons, neutral reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), free radicals, and molecule fragments [1]. Due to its distinct characteristics compared to ordinary neutral gases, plasma is considered as a fourth state of matter (besides solid, fluid, and gaseous). In modern medicine, high-temperature plasmas are used, e.g., for sterilization of medical devices and implants [29]. Cold atmospheric pressure plasmas (CAP), however, can also be used for the treatment of viable tissues and thus have become a focus of medical research over the past years. Besides therapeutic applications, CAP is also used for surface modification and biological decontamination [7, 1013].

A variety of different CAP devices have been developed and tested for research purposes. In general, these can be divided into direct discharge (e.g., DBD: dielectric barrier discharge) and indirect discharge (e.g., APPJ: atmospheric pressure plasma jet) devices. To date, three plasma devices have been certified for medical purposes. In 2013, the medical device kINPen® MED (INP Greifswald/neoplas tools GmbH, Greifswald, Germany), an APPJ, and PlasmaDerm® VU-2010 (CINOGY Technologies GmbH, Duderstadt, Germany), a DBD source, have been CE-certified in Germany by MEDCERT under the norm ISO 13485 (Table 1, Figure 1). Subsequently, the medical device SteriPlas (Adtec Ltd., London, United Kingdom) has been certified to be used for treatment of chronic and acute wounds, as well as for reduction of microbial load.


Atmospheric pressure plasma jet kINPen® MED (INP Greifswald/neoplas tools GmbH, Greifswald, Germany)
Dielectric barrier discharge source PlasmaDerm® VU-2010 (CINOGY GmbH plasma technology for health, Duderstadt, Germany)
SteriPlas (Adtec Ltd., London, United Kingdom)

The use of many different devices or modifications by different research groups pose a challenge with respect to comparability of the results obtained with these devices, leading to difficulties defining long-term safety and efficacy of plasma devices in a comparable and standardized manner. Numerous organizations on a national and international level have been established to certify technical standardization. Some of these organizations are specific for certain fields such as electrical engineering or telecommunications, and others are more general. An organization for general standardization in Germany is the German Institute for Standardization (DIN). The European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provide standardization on a European and international level, respectively.

In order to establish general requirements for plasma sources in medicine, a DIN SPEC 91315 has been published by Mann and colleagues in 2014 [14]. The goal is to provide basic criteria for plasma sources to be used as medical applications. Furthermore, the efficacy of medical plasma sources as well as the safety for users (experimenters, patients, therapists, etc.) is of great importance. Although Mann et al. did not define new threshold or standard values, concerning, e.g., leakage current, UV irradiance, and formation of toxic gases, they refer to already existing standards and guidelines (DIN EN ISO 12100, DIN EN 60601-1, DIN EN 60601-1-6, and DIN EN 60601-2-57). This procedure allows a faster implementation of certified standards.

The tests described in the DIN SPEC 91315 are easy to adapt if common laboratory equipment is available, but they have to be adjusted to every plasma source with regard to individual treatment conditions. In order to obtain information on performance, effectiveness, and safety of medical plasma devices, certain physical and biological characteristics should be assessed. Physical performances include temperature, optical emission spectrometry (OES), UV irradiance, gas emission, and leakage current, and biological performances include antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity, and chemical composition of liquid. These performances have been tested with a μs-pulsed DBD source on human skin fibroblasts [15] and according to the requirements of the DIN SPEC 91315 with the plasma jet kINPen® MED [16]. Both devices meet the requirements of the DIN SPEC 91315, indicating safety and effectiveness of these devices.

Besides standardization to allow comparability of different plasma sources, a thorough risk assessment for adverse effects such as genotoxicity and mutagenicity is of tremendous importance. A couple of studies using different testing systems have shown that moderate CAP treatment does not increase genotoxicity nor mutagenicity in cultured cells [17, 18]. Although these results are promising, further studies are needed to assess the potential risk of CAP under different conditions and intensities.

As mentioned above, plasma is composed of a number of different components which all may contribute more or less to its efficacy. While the mechanisms for the efficacy of CAP are not fully understood, it is conceivable that physical components such as UV radiation or electrical current as well as chemical components such as reactive oxygen species or reactive nitrogen species play a role in the mode of action. Numerous effects of CAP such as disinfection (bacteria, fungi, and viruses), tissue regeneration (pH modulation, angiogenesis), anti-inflammation (anti-itch), and anticancerous effects (proapoptotic) have been described [1923].

These effects provide an opportunity for CAP to be used in different applications. Applications of CAP in medicine are quite versatile and include decontamination/sterilization, use in dental medicine, enhancement of coagulation, surface coating of implants, cosmetics and plastic surgery, and treatment of skin diseases, and even the use in cancer treatment is being investigated [10, 19, 2433]. With respect to applications in medicine, this review focuses particularly on dermatological applications of CAP (Table 2) which include treatment of atopic eczema, itch, and pain, disinfection (bacteria, parasites, and fungus), treatment of ichthyosis/epidermal barrier defect, wound healing, scar treatment, and possibly treatment of skin tumors (melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma) [1922, 25, 33].


Atopic eczema, itch, and pain relief
Disinfection (bacteria/fungi/viruses)
Treatment of epidermal barrier defects such as ichthyosis
Wound healing
Scar treatment
Treatment of skin tumors

2. Atopic Eczema, Itch, and Pain

A case study presented at the 20th International Conference of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) 2008 showed a reduction of itch for four hours and an overall reduction of itch from 8 to 3 (on a scale from 0 to 10) after daily CAP treatment for one minute of the left arm vs. basic treatment of the right arm over a period of 30 days [34]. No side effects have been observed, and overall, the eczema of this patient was reduced by two points on a scale from -5 to +5. However, a randomized two-sided placebo-controlled study on the efficacy and safety of atmospheric nonthermal argon plasma for pruritus with a total of 46 patients showed a similar improvement between plasma-treated and placebo-treated group with respect to itch [35]. In this study, patients have been treated daily for two minutes with plasma or argon only (placebo). At the end of the study, a reduction of pruritus has been observed, which was likely due to standard therapy. Another case study of a patient with chronic postoperative ear infection showed a highly significant reduction of pain after CAP application for local infection control [36]. Considering these studies, cold atmospheric plasma seems to have positive effects on atopic eczema, itch, and pain, but still, more research is necessary to confirm these effects.

3. Disinfection (Bacteria/Fungi/Viruses)

Several studies have elucidated the lethality of CAP on bacteria and fungi and have shown its potential as an effective tool for disinfection. A two-minute CAP treatment, for example, has been shown to be effective against a variety of bacteria including important skin and wound pathogens such as Escherichia coli, group A Streptococcus, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, suggesting positive effects of CAP on wound healing [12]. Furthermore, the killing of clinically relevant fungal strains by CAP has been shown in vitro [37]. A significant reduction of bacterial and fungal targets after plasma treatment has also been shown on model nails with onychomycosis (a fungal infection of the nail) [38]. The authors of this study conclude that the “CAP technology appears to be a safe, effective, and inexpensive therapy for fungal nail infection treatment.” Following this in vitro study, an in vivo pilot study evaluated the plasma treatment on 19 study participants with toenail onychomycosis [39]. No long-term sequelae have been observed after plasma treatment, and overall clinical cure was observed in 53.8% of participants, whereas mycological cure was observed in 15.4% of participants. A prospective randomized controlled study including 37 patients with herpes zosters (a painful skin infection caused by the varicella zoster virus) revealed that a weekday five-minute CAP treatment is safe, painless, and effective, improving initial healing of the herpes zoster lesions [40]. Taken together, promising effects of CAP have been shown in regard to disinfection with no evidence for resistance of microorganisms against the treatment. Hence, CAP provides an effective method for skin disinfection.

4. Ichthyosis/Epidermal Barrier Defect

An acidic protective hydrolipid film produced by perspiratory glands and sebaceous glands covers the outer layer of the skin. This hydrolipid film provides an epidermal barrier that protects the skin from drying and contains a complex microbial ecosystem, consisting of numerous bacteria [41]. The pH of the hydrolipid film is balanced between 5.4 and 5.9 in healthy skin [42]. Altered conditions in the hydrolipid film compared to healthy skin can lead to a shift in the microbial load and thus may promote disease [43, 44]. Pathogenic bacteria usually prefer pH values above 6; consequently, areas with increased pH values possess a higher susceptibility to pathogenic growth [45]. The pH values in hydrolipid films of patients with diseases such as ichthyosis or atopic dermatitis have been shown to be higher compared to pH values of healthy skin [4648]. One reason for an increased pH in patients with atopic dermatitis may be due to a mutation in filaggrin, a protein involved in the regulation of epidermal homeostasis [49]. When human skin is treated with CAP, the hydrolipid film interacts directly with the chemical compounds of the plasma. This prompted Helmke and colleagues to investigate the effect of CAP on pH of the hydrolipid film of diseased skin [50]. Using a DBD plasma source, they treated lipid films of wool wax, pork sebum, and human lipid films with CAP and observed significant decreases in pH values. A treatment for only five seconds was sufficient to result in a decrease of pH, and treatment for 60 seconds led to a decrease of the pH down to 3.7 (from initial 4.6-6.2). The pH values of wool wax after plasma treatment remained decreased for more than two hours [50]. These studies provide first evidence for the potential treatment of epidermal barrier defects such as ichthyosis with CAP, where a decrease of the pH value would result in an inhibition of wound pathogens and, therefore, promote wound healing.

5. Wound Healing

In several clinical studies and case reports, the effect of CAP on wound healing has been assessed (Table 3). Different plasma sources have been used in these studies (e.g., kINPen MED or PlasmaDerm VU-2010, Figure 2). The use of a hand-held dielectric barrier discharge plasma generator (PlasmaDerm® VU-2010) to alleviate chronic venous leg ulcers has been assessed in a monocentric, two-armed, open, prospective, randomized, and controlled trial [51]. This pilot study included 14 patients with at least one chronic venous ulcer, which had been divided into two comparable groups each consisting of seven patients. One group received standard care, while the other group in addition to standard care also received plasma therapy. Both groups were treated three times a week for a total of eight weeks with subsequent follow-up of four weeks. While in both groups an ulcer size reduction of 50% has been observed, a greater size reduction (5.30 cm2 vs. 3.40 cm2) as well as a quicker size reduction after three weeks compared to the group without plasma treatment was found. Furthermore, there was one patient in the plasma-treated group who experienced complete healing of the ulcer. An example for successful wound healing after CAP treatment using the PlasmaDerm® VU-175 2010 is shown in Figure 3. Further prospective randomized controlled studies using a different plasma device (MicroPlaSter predecessor of SteriPlas, Adtec Healthcare) primarily aimed at decreasing the bacterial load in chronic wounds. These studies including 36 and 24 patients, respectively, showed significant reductions of bacterial load in CAP-treated chronic wounds [52, 53]. A subsequent open retrospective study with 70 patients suggests that wound healing may be accelerated by CAP treatment [36]. Improved healing of pressure ulcers was also found in a prospective randomized controlled trial including 50 patients of which 25 received CAP treatment using a Bioplasma jet device [54]. In another clinical case-control study, the efficacy of the plasma source kINPen MED was compared to octenidine treatment. This study including 16 patients with chronic leg ulcers revealed a similar reduction of bacteria using CAP treatment compared to octenidine [55]. A similar study with 34 patients showed a benefit of sequential treatment with CAP and octenidine dihydrochloride over treatment with just one of the two with respect to the antiseptic treatment [56]. In addition to studies investigating the effect of CAP on chronic wounds, a few pilot studies also looked at the efficacy of CAP on acute wounds [5759]. Heinlin and colleagues enrolled 40 patients with skin graft donor sites on the upper leg. Equally sized areas of the wounds were assigned randomly to receive either CAP or placebo treatment [59]. From the second posttreatment day onwards, the CAP-treated sites showed significant improved healing compared to placebo treatment. In a case report study, four sterile ablative laser lesions (acute wounds) were induced in each of five volunteers [60]. The wounds received either 10 seconds, three times 10 seconds, and 30 seconds CAP or no treatment for three consecutive days. Treatment for three times 10 seconds and single treatment for 30 seconds showed best results in early stages of wound healing, and even at later stages (after six months and after one year), plasma treatment resulted in improved outcomes with respect to avoiding posttraumatic skin disorders [58]. Another study including six individuals with vacuum-generated wounds on the forearm analyzed wound healing parameters such as area decline and histomorphological characteristics [57]. Wounds were treated with either no treatment, CAP, octenidine, or sequential treatment with CAP and octenidine. A statistically significant accelerated decline was observed after CAP treatment in comparison to the other treatment groups.


TitleNumber of subjectsConclusionWoundReference

A first prospective randomized controlled trial to decrease bacterial load using cold atmospheric argon plasma on chronic wounds in patients36 patientsHighly significant reduction in bacterial loadChronicIsbary et al. [53]
Successful and safe use of 2 min cold atmospheric argon plasma in chronic wounds: results of a randomized controlled trial24 patientsMicroPlaSter alpha: significant reduction in bacterial load
MicroPlaSter beta: highly significant reduction in bacterial load
ChronicIsbary et al. [52]
Cold atmospheric argon plasma treatment may accelerate wound healing in chronic wounds: results of an open retrospective randomized controlled study in vivo70 patientsWound healing may be accelerated by CAP, particularly for chronic venous ulcersChronicIsbary et al. [78]
The healing effect of low-temperature atmospheric-pressure plasma in pressure ulcer: a randomized controlled trial50 patientsCAP-treated group had significantly better PUSH (pressure ulcer scale for healing) scores and exudate amountChronicChuangsuwanich et al. [54]
Clinical use of cold atmospheric pressure argon plasma in chronic leg ulcers: a pilot study16 patientsImmediate antimicrobial effects of CAP plasma almost comparable to octenidine without signs of cytotoxicityChronicUlrich et al. [55]
Combined antibacterial effects of tissue-tolerable plasma and a modern conventional liquid antiseptic on chronic wound treatment34 patientsThe combined use of CAP and conventional antiseptics might represent the most efficient strategy for antiseptic treatment of chronic woundsChronicKlebes et al. [56]
Alleviation of chronic venous leg ulcers with a hand-held dielectric barrier discharge plasma generator (PlasmaDerm® VU-2010): results of a monocentric, two-armed, open, prospective, randomized and controlled trial14 patientsPlasmaDerm® VU-2010 device is safe and effective in patients with chronic venous leg ulcersChronicBrehmer et al. [51]
Randomized placebo-controlled human pilot study of cold atmospheric argon plasma on skin graft donor sites40 patientsDonor site wound areas treated with plasma showed significantly improved healing compared with placebo-treated areasAcuteHeinlin et al. [59]
Experimental recovery of CO2-laser skin lesions by plasma stimulation5 experimental case reportsNonthermal atmospheric pressure plasma stimulation of laser skin lesion recovery looks promisingAcuteMetelmann et al. [60]
Scar formation of laser skin lesions after cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) treatment: a clinical long-term observation20 laser lesions in 5 individualsPlasma treatment seems to support the inflammation needed for tissue regenerationAcuteMetelmann et al. [58]
Laser scanning microscopy as a means to assess the augmentation of tissue repair by exposition of wounds to tissue-tolerable plasma6 subjects with vacuum-generated woundsCAP led to a significantly more rapid area decline in comparison to no treatment, treatment with octenidine, and sequential treatment with CAP and octenidineAcuteVandersee et al. [57]

Accelerated wound healing has also been observed in a mouse model treated with a cold plasma jet [61]. In cell culture experiments with HaCaT keratinocytes and MRC5 fibroblasts, an increased motility of the cells has been observed after plasma treatment, and at least in HaCaT cells, this was associated with a decreased mRNA and protein expression of Cx43. Cx43 is a gap junctional protein of keratinocytes and was shown to inhibit cell migration and wound healing [61]. These findings suggest that cold plasma enhances wound healing in chronic and slowly healing wounds.

There are several aspects of CAP that may contribute to an improved wound healing: UV radiation and reactive gas species (i.e., ozone) disinfect the wound, generation of nitric oxide (NO) or nitrogen species (NOx) stimulates the regeneration of tissue, and electric current stimulates angiogenesis. Furthermore, CAP leads to an acidification of the wound (decrease of pH) [12, 20, 50, 6265].

6. Scar Treatment

The effect of CAP on tissue regeneration has also been elucidated for its potential in scar treatment. In one study, ten patients with acne scars received a single CAP treatment using a Plasma Skin Regeneration (PSR) system. According to patient and doctoral assessment, acne scars improved in 30% of the patients. Thermal damage to the epidermis and upper dermis had been observed for four-six days, and besides that, collagen remodeling effects without permanent pigmentary or textural irregularities as well as regenerative epidermal effects have been described [66]. Similarly, antimicrobiocidal effects of CAP and improved acne symptoms have been demonstrated using a direct DBD device. A reduction of P. acnes by 75% has been observed in a study with 31 volunteers [66].

Another cohort of 30 patients received weekly application of CAP for four weeks. This treatment led to a reduction of sebum production of 80%, which lasted four weeks following the treatment [66]. Although the authors concluded that their plasma source can offer a new therapeutic option for acne treatment, more studies are needed to validate these findings.

7. Skin Tumors

Potential applications of CAP in cancer therapy are currently explored by several research groups. The possibility of a paradigm shift in cancer therapy and the selectivity to ablate cancer cells (e.g., melanoma) while the corresponding normal cells remain unaffected have already been described in 2011 by Keidar and colleagues [19]. Detachment of SW900 cancer cells from the culture vessel after plasma treatment has been observed, whereas no detachment was observed when normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells were treated. Furthermore, one single in vivo treatment with CAP for two minutes of ten mice with subcutaneous bladder cancer tumors (SCaBER) showed an ablation of small tumors (about five millimeters in diameter) and a size reduction of larger tumors. While fully ablated tumors did not recur, larger tumors started to regrow but did not reach their original size even after three weeks.

Next, the in vivo efficacy of CAP in a murine melanoma model has been investigated. A single plasma treatment induced ablation of the tumor and decreased the growth rate markedly. This also resulted in an increased survival rate in the treatment group, with a median survival of 33.5 days compared to 24.5 days in the control group [19]. Following this study, a number of other studies assessed the efficacy of CAP as a potential therapy for cancer treatment. Daeschlein and colleagues compared the antitumor efficacy of CAP with electrochemotherapy (ECT) in a melanoma mouse model [30]. A single CAP treatment led to a significant delay of tumor growth acceleration. However, this was less effective compared to ECT, whereas the combination of CAP and ECT had the strongest effect. In light of these findings, the authors concluded that cold plasma provides a potential alternative to ECT and may serve as a new option for palliative skin melanoma therapy, either alone or in combination with ECT [30].

A murine melanoma B16/F10 cell line has been used to elucidate the effect of CAP against melanoma cells in vitro, showing a loss of viability of almost 100% 48 hours after CAP treatment for three minutes [29]. In addition, in vivo treatment with CAP of F10 cells in mice showed a decrease in growth of the tumors which was even comparable to the decrease of tumor growth achieved with chemotherapy [29].

In a clinical study with six patients suffering from locally advanced head and neck cancers, the efficacy and side effects of cold plasma treatment have been explored [67]. Two patients experienced a strong response to the treatment, resulting in a clear tumor reduction. While the tumor in one of these patients started to regrow ending with exitus letalis, the other patient was still receiving treatment, aiming for total remission. No side effects have been observed in two patients, while four patients experienced fatigue and a dry mouth. At least five of the patients had a reduction of odor, most likely due to decontamination, and four had a reduced demand of pain medication. Out of the six patients, five passed away after one to twelve months, which was not due to CAP application.

Besides ROS/RNS, the authors discussed the role of myeloid cells and the immunogenic cell death model of cancer treatment as potential mechanisms of action of CAP [67].

The potential use of CAP for cancer treatment has also been assessed in vitro and in vivo in several other nonskin cancer entities including breast cancer, pancreatic carcinomas, glioblastoma, colorectal carcinoma, and neuroblastomas [2428]. In these studies, growth inhibition of different cell lines in culture as well as decreased tumor growth or a reduction of tumor volume has been observed in different mouse models after CAP treatment.

Although the molecular mechanisms for the efficacy of CAP on cancer cells are not fully understood, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and charged particles have been determined to be major contributors to plasma-induced cell death [68].

Taken together, these findings indicate a general efficacy of CAP against various cancer entities, suggesting plasma to be a potential new therapy against diverse cancerous diseases. However, to integrate plasma treatment into modern cancer therapy, further studies have to be conducted.

8. Actinic Keratosis

The precancerous actinic keratosis is a patch of thick, scaly, or crusty skin [6971]. There are several options to treat actinic keratosis in order to prevent the development of squamous cell carcinomas. One option is the use of ingenol mebutate, which works in two ways: first, it leads to rapid lesion necrosis beginning one to two hours after application of ingenol mebutate, resulting from mitochondrial swelling and membrane disruption as well as membrane depolarization [72]. This process causes an inflammatory response, which, subsequently, leads to specific neutrophil-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) within days. These specific antibodies bind to specific antigens on dysplastic epidermal cells, as well as to receptors of infiltrating neutrophils, thereby causing the release of cytotoxic agents (e.g., ROS), which then destroy dysplastic epidermal cells [72]. The importance of the immune cell reaction against LK2 tumors (squamous cell carcinoma) has been shown in mice by Challacombe and colleagues. Following the treatment with PEP005 (ingenol-3-angelate), neutrophil-depleted mice showed a significant higher tumor volume in comparison to the control mice [73].

Similar to that, CAP seems to positively influence the healing of actinic keratosis as well. This has been shown in a pilot study with seven patients, who were treated twice a week, with CAP for two minutes, for a total of seven treatments [74]. All patients have shown promising responses with no adverse events so that further investment does not only seem necessary but also very promising. In a retrospective study of 12 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, CAP was used to decontaminate infected cancer ulcerations and evaluated for its anticancer effects [75]. Analysis of data from this study showed a decreased request for pain medication, a reduction of typical fetid odor related to a reduction of microbial load, and in some cases even a superficial partial remission of tumor and wound healing of infected ulcerations.

A case report from Daeschlein and colleagues showed promising results of CAP in a patient with recalcitrant actinic keratosis of the scalp [76]. No actinic lesion relapse has been observed until at least 26 months after a single treatment with CAP, and furthermore, scar formation had been proven.

Taken together, these studies indicate a promising application of CAP as an innovative therapy for skin cancers or precancerous conditions, but the evidence is still sparse, and more basic research as well as more clinical studies are needed. To foster the investigation of the efficacy and safety of CAP in dermatooncology, a world-wide first Leibniz professorship for plasmabiotechnology in dermatology has been introduced, offering an opportunity to bring clinical needs and scientific findings together, while integrating CAP treatment in dermatology [77].

9. Conclusions

CAP has been shown to be a promising and inexpensive treatment for a variety of different diseases. While CAP already reached standard medical care status for wound treatment, only preliminary data for its effects in oncology are available. Continuing efforts in this emerging and highly dynamic field of plasma medicine will be necessary to further explore the full therapeutic potential of CAP and to fully understand its mechanisms of action. Whereas the development of novel plasma sources and modifications of existing devices will open up more opportunities, it will be crucial to adhere to certain standards in order to enable comparability of results obtained in different studies. Overall, the exciting field of plasma medicine is expanding and thus is providing increasing evidence for the use of CAP as a treatment option for a variety of dermatological diseases.

Disclosure

The content of this review has been presented at least in part as an oral presentation during the 7th International Conference on Plasma Medicine in Philadelphia, USA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Damp Stiftung and through the joint research project ONKOTHER-H supported by the European Social Fund, reference: ESF/14-BM-A55-0001/18 & 06/18, and the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.

References

  1. T. Gerling and K.-D. Weltmann, Einfhrung in Atmosphrendruck-Plasmaquellen fr plasmamedizinische Anwendung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Plasmamedizin, 2016.
  2. K.-D. Weltmann, M. Polak, K. Masur, T. von Woedtke, J. Winter, and S. Reuter, “Plasma processes and plasma sources in medicine,” Contributions to Plasma Physics, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 644–654, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K.-D. Weltmann, J. Winter, M. Polak, J. Ehlbeck, and T. Woedtke, Plasma for Bio-Decontamination , Medicine and Food Security, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.
  4. G. E. Morfill and J. L. Zimmermann, “Plasma health care - old problems, new solutions,” Contributions to Plasma Physics, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 655–663, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Ehlbeck, U. Schnabel, M. Polak et al., “Low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma sources for microbial decontamination,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 013002, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. Woedtke, A. Kramer, and K.-D. Weltmann, “Plasma sterilization: what are the conditions to meet this claim?” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 534–539, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Moreau, N. Orange, and M. G. J. Feuilloley, “Non-thermal plasma technologies: new tools for bio-decontamination,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Laroussi, “Low temperature plasma-based sterilization: overview and state-of-the-art,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 391–400, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Moisan, J. Barbeau, S. Moreau, J. Pelletier, M. Tabrizian, and L.'. H. Yahia, “Low-temperature sterilization using gas plasmas: a review of the experiments and an analysis of the inactivation mechanisms,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 226, no. 1-2, pp. 1–21, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Woedtke, S. Reuter, K. Masur, and K.-D. Weltmann, “Plasmas for medicine,” Physics Reports, vol. 530, no. 4, pp. 291–320, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Daeschlein, M. Napp, S. von Podewils et al., “In vitro susceptibility of multidrug resistant skin and wound pathogens against low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBD),” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Daeschlein, S. Scholz, A. Arnold et al., “In vitro susceptibility of important skin and wound pathogens against low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and dielectric barrier discharge plasma (DBD),” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 380–389, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. d'Agostino, P. Favia, C. Oehr, and M. R. Wertheimer, “Low-temperature plasma processing of materials: past, present, and future,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Mann, R. Tiede, R. Ahmed et al., DIN SPEC 91315: General Requirements for Plasma Sources in Medicine, Beuth Verlag, 2014.
  15. R. Tiede, J. Hirschberg, W. Viöl, and S. Emmert, “A μs-pulsed dielectric barrier discharge source: physical characterization and biological effects on human skin fibroblasts,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 775–787, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. S. Mann, R. Tiede, K. Gavenis et al., “Introduction to DIN-specification 91315 based on the characterization of the plasma jet kINPen MED,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 35–45, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Maisch, A. K. Bosserhoff, P. Unger et al., “Investigation of toxicity and mutagenicity of cold atmospheric argon plasma,” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 172–177, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Wende, S. Bekeschus, A. Schmidt et al., “Risk assessment of a cold argon plasma jet in respect to its mutagenicity,” Mutation Research, Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol. 798-799, pp. 48–54, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Keidar, R. Walk, A. Shashurin et al., “Cold plasma selectivity and the possibility of a paradigm shift in cancer therapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1295–1301, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Emmert, F. Brehmer, H. Hänßle et al., “Atmospheric pressure plasma in dermatology: ulcus treatment and much more,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Heinlin, G. Isbary, W. Stolz et al., “Plasma applications in medicine with a special focus on dermatology,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Heinlin, G. Morfill, M. Landthaler et al., “Plasma medicine: possible applications in dermatology,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 968–976, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. Daeschlein, T. von Woedtke, E. Kindel, R. Brandenburg, K. D. Weltmann, and M. Jünger, “Antibacterial activity of an atmospheric pressure plasma jet against relevant wound pathogens in vitro on a simulated wound environment,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 224–230, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. M. Walk, J. A. Snyder, P. Srinivasan et al., “Cold atmospheric plasma for the ablative treatment of neuroblastoma,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Vandamme, E. Robert, S. Lerondel et al., “ROS implication in a new antitumor strategy based on non-thermal plasma,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 130, no. 9, pp. 2185–2194, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. N. Hattori, S. Yamada, K. Torii et al., “Effectiveness of plasma treatment on pancreatic cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1655–1662, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Brullé, M. Vandamme, D. Riès et al., “Effects of a non thermal plasma treatment alone or in combination with gemcitabine in a MIA PaCa2-luc orthotopic pancreatic carcinoma model,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 12, p. e52653, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Mirpour, S. Piroozmand, N. Soleimani et al., “Utilizing the micron sized non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma inside the animal body for the tumor treatment application,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Mashayekh, H. Rajaee, M. Akhlaghi, B. Shokri, and Z. M. Hassan, “Atmospheric-pressure plasma jet characterization and applications on melanoma cancer treatment (B/16-F10),” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 22, no. 9, p. 093508, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Daeschlein, S. Scholz, S. Lutze et al., “Comparison between cold plasma, electrochemotherapy and combined therapy in a melanoma mouse model,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 582–586, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. Fridman, A. Shereshevsky, M. M. Jost et al., “Floating electrode dielectric barrier discharge plasma in air promoting apoptotic behavior in melanoma skin cancer cell lines,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 163–176, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. Fridman, M. Peddinghaus, M. Balasubramanian et al., “Blood coagulation and living tissue sterilization by floating-electrode dielectric barrier discharge in air,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 425–442, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. Fridman, A. Shereshevsky, M. Peddinghaus et al., “Bio-medical applications of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma,” in 37th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  34. N. Mertens, A. Goppold, S. Emmert, and W. Vioel, Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma-A Powerful Tool for Medical Applications, 20th International Conference of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT), Vienna, Austria, 2008.
  35. J. Heinlin, G. Isbary, W. Stolz et al., “A randomized two-sided placebo-controlled study on the efficacy and safety of atmospheric non-thermal argon plasma for pruritus,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 324–331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. Isbary, T. Shimizu, J. L. Zimmermann, H. M. Thomas, G. E. Morfill, and W. Stolz, “Cold atmospheric plasma for local infection control and subsequent pain reduction in a patient with chronic post-operative ear infection,” New Microbes and New Infections, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 41–43, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. Daeschlein, S. Scholz, T. von Woedtke et al., “In vitro killing of clinical fungal strains by low-temperature atmospheric-pressure plasma jet,” IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 815–821, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Z. Xiong, J. Roe, T. C. Grammer, and D. B. Graves, “Plasma treatment of onychomycosis,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 588–597, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. R. Lipner, G. Friedman, and R. K. Scher, “Pilot study to evaluate a plasma device for the treatment of onychomycosis,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 295–298, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Isbary, T. Shimizu, J. L. Zimmermann et al., “Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial showed cold atmospheric argon plasma relieved acute pain and accelerated healing in herpes zoster,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 50–55, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. A. Bojar and K. T. Holland, “Review: the human cutaneous microflora and factors controlling colonisation,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 889–903, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. H. Schmid-Wendtner and H. C. Korting, “The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function,” Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 296–302, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Marchionini and R. Schmidt, “Säuremantel der Haut und Bakterienabwehr,” Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 461–467, 1939. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. N. Fredricks, “Microbial ecology of human skin in health and disease,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Symposium Proceedings, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 167–169, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. M. Stewart, M. B. Cole, J. D. Legan, L. Slade, M. H. Vandeven, and D. W. Schaffner, “Staphylococcus aureus growth boundaries: moving towards mechanistic predictive models based on solute-specific effects,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1864–1871, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. B. Glibbery and R. Mani, “pH in leg ulcers,” International Journal of Microcirculation, Clinical and Experimental, vol. 2, p. 109, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  47. S. Seidenari and G. Giusti, “Objective assessment of the skin of children affected by atopic dermatitis: a study of pH, capacitance and TEWL in eczematous and clinically uninvolved skin,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 75, pp. 429–433, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  48. H. Öhman and A. Vahlquist, “The pH gradient over the stratum corneum differs in X-linked recessive and autosomal dominant ichthyosis; a clue to the molecular origin of the “acid skin mantle”?” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 674–677, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. M. Jungersted, H. Scheer, M. Mempel et al., “Stratum corneum lipids, skin barrier function and filaggrin mutations in patients with atopic eczema,” Allergy, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 911–918, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. Helmke, D. Hoffmeister, N. Mertens, S. Emmert, J. Schuette, and W. Vioel, “The acidification of lipid film surfaces by non-thermal DBD at atmospheric pressure in air,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, no. 11, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. F. Brehmer, H. A. Haenssle, G. Daeschlein et al., “Alleviation of chronic venous leg ulcers with a hand-held dielectric barrier discharge plasma generator (PlasmaDerm®VU-2010): results of a monocentric, two-armed, open, prospective, randomized and controlled trial (NCT01415622),” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 148–155, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. Isbary, J. Heinlin, T. Shimizu et al., “Successful and safe use of 2 min cold atmospheric argon plasma in chronic wounds: results of a randomized controlled trial,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 404–410, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. Isbary, G. Morfill, H. U. Schmidt et al., “A first prospective randomized controlled trial to decrease bacterial load using cold atmospheric argon plasma on chronic wounds in patients,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 163, pp. 78–82, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. Chuangsuwanich, T. Assadamongkol, and D. Boonyawan, “The healing effect of low-temperature atmospheric-pressure plasma in pressure ulcer: a randomized controlled trial,” The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 313–319, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. Ulrich, F. Kluschke, A. Patzelt et al., “Clinical use of cold atmospheric pressure argon plasma in chronic leg ulcers: a pilot study,” Journal of wound care, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 196–203, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Klebes, C. Ulrich, F. Kluschke et al., “Combined antibacterial effects of tissue-tolerable plasma and a modern conventional liquid antiseptic on chronic wound treatment,” Journal of Biophotonics, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 382–391, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Vandersee, H. Richter, J. Lademann et al., “Laser scanning microscopy as a means to assess the augmentation of tissue repair by exposition of wounds to tissue tolerable plasma,” Laser Physics Letters, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 115701, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H.-R. Metelmann, T. T. Vu, H. T. Do et al., “Scar formation of laser skin lesions after cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) treatment: a clinical long term observation,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Heinlin, J. L. Zimmermann, F. Zeman et al., “Randomized placebo-controlled human pilot study of cold atmospheric argon plasma on skin graft donor sites,” Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 800–807, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H.-R. Metelmann, T. von Woedtke, R. Bussiahn et al., “Experimental recovery of CO 2 -laser skin lesions by plasma stimulation,” American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Schmidt, S. Bekeschus, K. Wende, B. Vollmar, and T. Woedtke, “A cold plasma jet accelerates wound healing in a murine model of full-thickness skin wounds,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 156–162, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. N. Plasmamedizin, “Risikopotenzial und zu Anwendungsperspektiven von kaltem Atmosphrendruckplasma in der Medizin. Positionspaper des Nationalen Zentrums fr Plasmamedizin,” Plasmakurier, vol. 1, pp. 43–52, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  63. G. Fridman, G. Friedman, A. Gutsol, A. B. Shekhter, V. N. Vasilets, and A. Fridman, “Applied plasma medicine,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 503–533, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Helmke, D. Hoffmeister, F. Berge et al., “Physical and microbiological characterisation of Staphylococcus epidermidis inactivation by dielectric barrier discharge plasma,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 278–286, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. G. Valacchi, V. Fortino, and V. Bocci, “The dual action of ozone on the skin,” The British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1096–1100, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C. Chutsirimongkol, D. Boonyawan, N. Polnikorn, W. Techawatthanawisan, and T. Kundilokchai, “Non-thermal plasma for acne and aesthetic skin improvement,” Plasma Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1-4, pp. 79–88, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H.-R. Metelmann, C. Seebauer, V. Miller et al., “Clinical experience with cold plasma in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 9, pp. 6–13, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. A. Lin, N. Chernets, J. Han et al., “Non-equilibrium dielectric barrier discharge treatment of mesenchymal stem cells: charges and reactive oxygen species play the major role in cell death,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1117–1127, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. J. Quaedvlieg, E. Tirsi, M. R. Thissen, and G. A. Krekels, “Actinic keratosis: how to differentiate the good from the bad ones?” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 335–339, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  70. I. M. Freedberg and T. B. Fritzpatrick, Fritzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine, McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, New York, 2003.
  71. V. Prajapati and B. Barankin, “Dermacase. Actinic keratosis,” Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 691–699, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  72. R. H. Rosen, A. K. Gupta, and S. K. Tyring, “Dual mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate gel for topical treatment of actinic keratoses: rapid lesion necrosis followed by lesion-specific immune response,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 486–493, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J. M. Challacombe, A. Suhrbier, P. G. Parsons et al., “Neutrophils are a key component of the antitumor efficacy of topical chemotherapy with ingenol-3-angelate,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 8123–8132, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. Wirtz, I. Stoffels, J. Dissemond, D. Schadendorf, and A. Roesch, “Actinic keratoses treated with cold atmospheric plasma,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. e37–e39, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. H.-R. Metelmann, D. S. Nedrelow, C. Seebauer et al., “Head and neck cancer treatment and physical plasma,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. G. Daeschlein, A. Arnold, S. Lutze et al., “Treatment of recalcitrant actinic keratosis (AK) of the scalp by cold atmospheric plasma,” Cogent Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. Weishaupt and S. Emmert, “Connecting basic cold plasma technology to dermato-oncology,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 16–19, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. G. Isbary, W. Stolz, T. Shimizu et al., “Cold atmospheric argon plasma treatment may accelerate wound healing in chronic wounds: results of an open retrospective randomized controlled study in vivo,” Clinical Plasma Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 25–30, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Thoralf Bernhardt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

4579 Views | 1911 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.