Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 6492029 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6492029

Shreekrishna Lamichane, Sang Hong Baek, Yeon-Ju Kim, Ji Hye Park, Babita Dahal Lamichane, Woong Bi Jang, SeungTaek Ji, Na Kyung Lee, Li Dehua, Da Yeon Kim, Songhwa Kang, Ha Jong Seong, Jisoo Yun, Dong Hyung Lee, Hyung Ryong Moon, Hae Young Chung, Sang-Mo Kwon, "MHY2233 Attenuates Replicative Cellular Senescence in Human Endothelial Progenitor Cells via SIRT1 Signaling", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 6492029, 18 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6492029

MHY2233 Attenuates Replicative Cellular Senescence in Human Endothelial Progenitor Cells via SIRT1 Signaling

Academic Editor: Gabriele Saretzki
Received13 Feb 2019
Accepted09 Apr 2019
Published22 May 2019

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a major cause of death worldwide. Due to the prevalence of many side effects and incomplete recovery from pharmacotherapies, stem cell therapy is being targeted for the treatment of CVDs. Among the different types of stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have great potential. However, cellular replicative senescence decreases the proliferation, migration, and overall function of EPCs. Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) has been mainly studied in the mammalian aging process. MHY2233 is a potent synthetic SIRT1 activator and a novel antiaging compound. We found that MHY2233 increased the expression of SIRT1, and its deacetylase activity thereby decreased expression of the cellular senescence biomarkers, p53, p16, and p21. In addition, MHY2233 decreased senescence-associated beta-galactosidase- (SA-β-gal-) positive cells and senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs), such as the secretion of interleukin- (IL-) 6, IL-8, IL-1α, and IL-1β. MHY2233 treatment protected senescent EPCs from oxidative stress by decreasing cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, thus enhancing cell survival and function. The angiogenesis, proliferation, and migration of senescent EPCs were enhanced by MHY2233 treatment. Thus, MHY2233 reduces replicative and oxidative stress-induced senescence in EPCs. Therefore, this novel antiaging compound MHY2233 might be considered a potent therapeutic agent for the treatment of age-associated CVDs.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death throughout the world [13]. Among various CVDs, tissue ischemia associated with stroke and coronary heart disease represents the majority [2]. Despite advancements in the field of pharmacotherapy, complete recovery from CVDs and elimination of side effects of the drugs are still major challenges. Recently, stem cell therapy is emerging as a promising strategy for the treatment of CVDs [3]. Different types of stem cells that are utilized for the treatment of ischemic heart diseases include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), adipose tissue-derived stem cells (Ad-MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) [4].

Endothelial injury is associated with many CVDs, such as atherosclerosis, thrombosis, hypertension, and myocardial infraction. Circulating EPCs maintain endothelial integrity and neovascular functions; hence, they are candidates for cell therapy in CVDs [1, 5]. EPCs have a high capacity to migrate, proliferate, and differentiate into mature endothelial cells (ECs) [6]. EPCs can mobilize into the peripheral blood from the bone marrow and collect at injured or ischemic vascular sites to assist with vascular regeneration [7]. Senescent or impaired EPCs are risk factors of CVDs and are responsible for endothelial dysfunction [8]. With aging, stem cells lose their self-renewal capacity to proliferate, differentiate, migrate, and restitute the original function of damaged cells [5]. The functions of EPCs are age-dependent, and the capacity to repair damaged tissue varies with age. Bone marrow-derived EPCs from young rats improved angiogenesis in impaired myocardium more than those from the aged rats [7].

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) has been studied mostly in vascular aging and CVDs. SIRT1 is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent histone deacetylase, which aids in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. SIRT1 is highly expressed in EPCs [9] and is a longevity gene that has important protective effects in CVDs [10]. An age-dependent decrease in SIRT1 levels was observed in arteries, which suggests its role in aging of the cardiovascular system. SIRT1 delays both replicative senescence and premature senescence in stem cells and differentiated cells that were exposed to oxidative stress [11]. Oxidative stress is also a key factor for endothelial senescence [8]. Beneficial effects of SIRT1 on aging via DNA modulation have been reported [12]. SIRT1 is normally localized in the nucleus, where it deacetylates p53, Forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors [13], histones, and nonhistone proteins [14]. It regulates chromatin structure, transcription, apoptosis, cell survival, DNA repair, inflammation, and oxidative stress by deacetylating numerous substrates [15]. In replicative cell senescence, the cell cycle inhibitors, p53, p21, and p16, are activated and delay cell division, [16] and the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin E is decreased [17]. SIRT1 deacetylates p53 and reduces the ability of p53 to regulate transcription of p21, which is a cell cycle inhibitor [18]. The SIRT1 promoter binds the transcription factors FOXO3a and p53. Upon starvation, FOXO3a translocates to the nucleus and then binds the SIRT1 promoter to remove p53. Since p53 represses SIRT1 gene expression, p53 removal by FOXO3a activates SIRT1 transcription [13].

MHY2233 is a potent SIRT1 activator synthesized from 18 benzoxazole hydrochloride derivatives based on the structure of well-known SIRT1 activators, such as resveratrol and SRT1720. The binding capacity of MHY2233 to SIRT1 is 1.5-fold higher than that of resveratrol. MHY2233 was shown to suppress the acetylation of p53 in db/db mice. MHY2233 has been identified as the strongest SIRT1 activator using an in vitro SIRT1 activity assay, and MHY2233 induces more SIRT1 deacetylase activity than resveratrol [14]. Surprisingly, to date, there has been no study on the effects of MHY2233 on aging.

The main purpose of this study is to examine the role of the novel compound, MHY2233, in preventing vascular senescence in human EPCs. Moreover, this study is aimed at evaluating the effect of MHY2233 on the biological functions of senescent EPCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Culture of Human EPCs

Human umbilical cord blood was provided by Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from the human umbilical cord blood by density gradient centrifugation through Ficoll (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Isolated MNCs were seeded in 1% gelatin- (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) coated culture plates and cultured in endothelium growth medium-2 (EGM-2) (Lonza, USA): endothelium basal medium-2 (EBM-2) containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS), human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), human basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), human insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), human epidermal growth factor (EGF), ascorbic acid, and GA-1000. The medium was changed daily, and colonies were cultured for further use. EPCs from passage 8 to passage 10 were used as young EPCs, and EPCs from passage 16 to passage 20 were used as senescent EPCs in the experiments.

2.2. Cytotoxicity Assay (Cell Viability Assay)

Passage 10 EPCs were used for the cytotoxicity assay using the D-Plus Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), lot number DI1701-01 (http://www.donginls.com). Before seeding, each 96-well plate was coated with 1% gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), incubated for 15 min at 37°C and then washed with 1x PBS (phosphate-buffered saline). Seven thousand cells were seeded per well in the required number of wells and incubated for 24 h. Then, the medium was removed and the cells were treated with different concentrations of drug for another 24 h. After that, the medium was removed and diluted CCK-8 solution was added to each well and incubated for one hour at 37°C. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nM using a SUNRISE-absorbance microplate reader (serial number 909004125; Firmware: V 3.32 08/07/08; XFLUOR4 version V 4.51) in order to assess cytotoxicity.

2.3. Senescence-Associated β-Galactosidase (SA-β-gal) Assay

To measure SA-β-gal activity, 6-well Nunc plates, which had been coated with 1% gelatin and washed with 1x PBS, were seeded with cells per well. After removing the medium, the cells were stained using an x-Gal staining kit (Senescence β-Galactosidase Staining Kit # 9860; Cell Signaling Technology, http://www.cellsignal.com) to determine the number of senescent cells, following the manufacturer’s protocol. After staining, images from five random microscopic fields were acquired by using a light microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Drug Treatment

MHY2233 was provided by Prof. Hyung Ryong Moon, Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University. The known SIRT1 activator, resveratrol (R5010; Sigma-Aldrich, USA), was used as a positive control. Similarly, the specific inhibitor of SIRT1, EX527 (E7034; Sigma-Aldrich, Ukraine), was used as a negative control. MHY2233, resveratrol, and EX527 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; D2438; UK). Because long-term or chronic treatments with the drugs were cytotoxic, low drug concentrations were used: 10 nM of MHY2233, 100 nM of resveratrol, and 100 nM of EX527.

2.5. Tube Formation Assay (Angiogenesis In Vitro)

For the in vitro tube-forming assay, 7500 cells/well were seeded in 96-well plates coated with Matrigel® GFR (BD, Science, http://www.bd.com) and incubated for 6 to 8 h. The tube formation capacity of EPCs was determined by counting the number of tubes formed and by measuring the total length of the tubes formed using a microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured in one microscopic field per well under 40x magnification.

2.6. Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

For determining mRNA levels, total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL® (Ambion, Life Technologies, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of RNA was measured by a NanoDrop™ UV spectrophotometer. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript™ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TAKARA, Japan, Cat# 6110A). SYBR® Green Real-Time PCR Mastermix (Roche, Germany) was used for determining the mRNA levels of different genes using the primers listed in Table 1. The Roche Light Cycler 96 Real-Time PCR machine was used for thermal cycling. The data were calculated using double delta Ct analysis and were normalized against control gene (GAPDH).


Name of gene (human)Sequences of primers used

GAPDHForward: ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC
Reverse: TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGT
SIRT1Forward: GCAGATTAGTAGGCGGCTTG
Reverse: TCTGGCATGTCCCACTATCA
SIRT2Forward: CCGGCCTCTATGACAACCTA
Reverse: GGAGTAGCCCCTTGTCCTTC
SIRT3Forward: CAGTCTGCCAAAGACCCTTC
Reverse: AAATCAACCACATGCAGCAA
SIRT4Forward: CAGCAAGTCCTCCTCTGGAC
Reverse: CCAGCCTACGAAGTTTCTCG
SIRT5Forward: GCTCGCCCACTGTGATTTAT
Reverse: CCCTGGAAATGAAACCTGAA
SIRT6Forward: CCAAGTTCGACACCACCTTT
Reverse: CGGACGTACTGCGTCTTACA
SIRT7Forward: CGCCAAATACTTGGTCGTCT
Reverse: GTGATGCTCATGTGGGTGAG
p16Forward: CCCCGATTGAAAGAACCAGAGA
Reverse: ACGGTAGTGGGGGAAGGCATAT
p21Forward: CCGCCCCCTCCTCTAGCTGT
Reverse: CCCCCATCATACCCCTAACACA
p53Forward: CCGGCGCACAGAGGAAGAGA
Reverse: TGGGGAGAGGACTGGTGTTGT
IL-6Forward: TACCCCCAGGAGAAGATTCC
Reverse: TTTTCTGCCAGTGCCTCTTT
IL-8Forward: GTGCAGTTTTGCCAAGGAGT
Reverse: CTCTGCACCCAGTTTTCCTT
IL-1αForward: AATGACGCCCTCAATCAAAG
Reverse: TGGGTATCTCAGGCATCTCC
IL-1βForward: GGGCCTCAAGGAAAAGAATC
Reverse: TTCTGCTTGAGAGGTGCTGA
VEGFR2Forward: GTGACCAACATGGAGTCGTG
Reverse: TGCTTCACAGAAGACCATGC
CXCR4Forward: ATGCAAGGCAGTCCATGTCA
Reverse: ATGAATGTCCACCTCGCTTT

2.7. Western Blot Analysis

Total protein was extracted on ice with RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, http://www.thermofisher.com) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and protein concentration was quantified using a Bicinchoninic Acid Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins were separated using 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate- (SDS-) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were transferred to Immobilon® polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Merck). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk for one hour at room temperature and were incubated with primary antibodies against SIRT1 (sc-74504, Santa Cruz), p53 acetylated on K382 (Ac-p53) (ab75754, Abcam), CDKN2A/p16INK4a (ab108349, Abcam), p21 (ab109199, Abcam), FOXO3a (#2497, Cell Signaling), cyclin D1 (sc-8396, Santa Cruz), cyclin E (sc-481, Santa Cruz), eNOS (#9586, Cell Signaling), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylated on S1177 (p-eNOS) (#9571, Cell Signaling), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, sc-25778 and sc-47724, Santa Cruz) at 4°C overnight. After washing with 1x TBST (Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20), the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature for one hour. Anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (ADI-SAB-300-J, EnZo) and anti-mouse HRP conjugate (ADI-SAB-100-J, EnZo) were used as secondary antibodies. After washing the membranes again with 1x TBST, the bands were visualized using Luminata Crescendo Western HRP Substrate (Millipore; Cat. No. WBLUR0500) and X-ray film. GAPDH was used as a loading control for all western blots.

2.8. Cell Proliferation Assay

EPCs (7000 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates coated with 1% gelatin and incubated for 6, 24, or 48 h. Cell proliferation was determined by WST-8 assay, using the D-Plus CCK-8 (lot number DI1701-01; http://www.donginls.com). The absorbance after treatment with CCK-8 was measured at 450 nM using a SUNRISE-absorbance microplate reader (serial number 909004125; Firmware: V 3.32 08/07/08; XFLUOR4 version V 4.51). Cell proliferation was also evaluated by cell counting after trypan blue (Welgene) staining. Senescent cells ( per well, passage 19) were pretreated with DMSO, 10 nM MHY2233, 100 nM resveratrol, or 100 nM EX527, seeded in 6-well plates, and cultured in EGM2 medium for 6, 12, 24, or 48 h. The number of unstained cells at each time point was counted after trypsinization.

2.9. Scratch Wound Healing Assay

Senescent EPCs ( cells/well, passage 20) were pretreated with DMSO, 10 nM MHY2233, 100 nM resveratrol, or 100 nM EX527 and seeded in 6-well plates. Cell migration was assessed by the scratch wound healing method. After 24 h of culturing, at full confluence, a linear gap in the cell monolayer was created by scratching the surface with an SPLScar Scratcher (SPL Life Science, Korea). The cells were washed to remove detached cells and incubated at 37°C. Images were captured by using a light microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h. The migrated area was calculated using the following formula:

2.10. Transwell® Migration Assay

Transwell® migration assays were performed using 24-well Transwell® inserts (8 μM pore size; Costar, USA). The upper sides of the inserts were coated with 1% gelatin and placed on a clean bench for 30 min. In each upper insert, cells were seeded with EBM-2 containing 2% FBS; EGM-2 containing 5% FBS, 1% PS, and other endothelial cell growth supplements was placed in each lower chamber. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 6 h. Afterward, the cells were fixed for 10–15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde. The cells were then stained with 0.5% crystal violet (25% methanol and 1% crystal violet at a ratio of 1 : 1) for one hour. The inserts were washed twice with distilled water, and the membranes were excised and mounted on glass slides. The cell migration capacity was quantified by counting the number of cells that had migrated in five random microscopic fields (100x magnification) using a microscope (AXIO Imager; M2 ZEISS).

2.11. SIRT1 Deacetylase Activity Assay

SIRT1 deacetylase activity was measured by using a commercial kit (SIRT1 Assay Kit CS1040; Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 5 μL NAD+ solution (cat. No. N1663) was added per well in white 96-well plates except for the blank wells. After adding a 5 μL activator (resveratrol), 5 μL inhibitor (EX527), or 5 μL sample drug (MHY2233) in the respective wells, 1.5 μg human SIRT1 recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli (cat. No. S8446) was added to each well. Then, a 10 μL SIRT1 substrate (cat. No. S9821) was added to each well. The final volume was brought to 50 μL by adding the required volume of assay buffer (cat. No. A6480). The plate was mixed in a horizontal shaker for 1 min. After incubating the plate at 37°C for 30 min, 5 μL developing solution (cat. No. D5068) was added and mixed by pipetting. The plate was again incubated at 37°C for 10 min. Then, the fluorescence signal was measured at excitation/emission wavelengths of 355/460 nM using a Multilabel Plate Reader (VICTOR3). Finally, the SIRT1 deacetylase activity was calculated using a standard curve.

2.12. Immunocytochemistry

Senescent EPCs (5000 cells/well, passage 17) that had been pretreated with DMSO or 10 nM MHY2233 were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well tissue culture plates. The cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min. Then, the fixed cells were blocked for one hour at room temperature using 10% normal goat serum containing 0.3 M glycine in PBS. After washing with 1% BSA in PBS, the cells were incubated with specific primary antibody (1 : 100 dilution) overnight at 4°C. The cells were washed with 1% BSA in PBS four times and incubated with Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-mouse or Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen) for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. After washing, the nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1 μg/mL). After washing four times, the coverslip was removed and mounted on a glass slide using Prolong® Diamond Antifade Mountant (Ref. p36961, Molecular Probes, Life Technologies). Confocal images were acquired using a Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope-KM (ZEISS LSM 700).

2.13. Cell Cycle Analysis

For cell cycle analysis, passage 18 senescent EPCs pretreated with DMSO, MHY2233, resveratrol, or EX527 were trypsinized when cell confluence was approximately 60–70% and collected. The harvested cells were washed with 1x PBS, fixed in 70% cold ethanol at 4°C overnight, washed with FACS buffer (2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA in PBS), and stained with Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/mL) and Pyronin Y (1 μg/mL) for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. Cell cycle distribution was then analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto M). Cell cycle distributions were assessed by using FlowJo single cell analysis software (V10.3, USA).

2.14. Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

To determine cellular ROS levels, EPCs were treated with DMSO, 10 nM MHY2233, 100 nM resveratrol, or 100 nM EX527 for 24 h and then treated with 600 μM H2O2 for 30 min. Afterward, the cells were detached with trypsin and washed with FACS buffer. Then, the cells were stained with 10 μM 6-carboxy-2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (carboxyl H2DFFDA) in FACS buffer for 30 min at 37°C and washed with FACS buffer three times. ROS levels were determined using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS; BD Accuri C6).

2.15. Annexin V and Propidium Iodide (PI) Staining Assay

To measure the percentage of apoptotic cells, we harvested the cells and washed them twice with cold PBS. Then, the cells were suspended in 1x binding buffer followed by the addition of 5 μL fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) annexin V and 5 μL PI. After gentle vortexing, the cells were incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Then, 400 μL of 1x binding solution was added to each tube. Finally, the percentage of apoptotic cells was measured by FACS (BD Accuri C6) and separated as live cells (FITC-annexin V/PI), apoptotic cells (FITC-annexin V+/PI), and dead cells (FITC-annexin V+/PI+).

2.16. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as of the mean (SEM) of at least three replicates and analyzed by using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. Unpaired Student’s -tests were used to compare between two groups, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the difference among more than two groups using Tukey-Kramer multiple post hoc comparisons. A value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant (, , and ).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Replicative Senescent EPCs

To investigate the characteristic features of young EPCs and senescent EPCs, SA-β-gal activity, senescence marker proteins, and mRNA expression levels between young and senescent EPCs were evaluated. The number of SA-β-gal-positive cells was significantly higher in senescent EPCs than in young EPCs (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). To evaluate the difference between functional activities of young and senescent EPCs, cell proliferation, Transwell® migration, and tube formation assays were performed. The cell proliferation capacity of young EPCs (Figure 1(c)) and the number of migrating cells in the Transwell® were significantly increased compared to that of senescent EPCs (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)). Moreover, the tube-forming capacity of young EPCs in Matrigel® was significantly higher compared to that of senescent EPCs (Figure 1(f)). Likewise, the tube length and number of branches formed in Matrigel® were markedly decreased in senescent EPCs (Figures 1(g) and 1(h)). We also checked the expression levels of the senescence-associated markers, SIRT1, acetylated p53, p16INK4a, and p21. The protein expression of SIRT1 was decreased in senescent EPCs whereas that of Ac-p53, p16INK4a, and p21 was increased (Figure 1(i)). Similarly, the mRNA level of SIRT1 was found to be decreased markedly, but the mRNA level of p53, p21, and p16 was significantly increased in senescent EPCs when compared with that of young EPCs (Supplementary Figure S1). Thus, these results clarify the characteristic differences between young and senescent EPCs and suggest that the functional activities of EPCs decrease with aging or senescence.

3.2. SIRT1 Deacetylase Activity of the Novel Antiaging Compound MHY2233

First, we isolated EPCs from the human umbilical cord blood; the experimental design is outlined in Figure 2(a). The novel compound MHY2233 was synthesized as an activator of SIRT1 based on the structure of resveratrol and SRT1720 (Figure 2(b)) [14]. Then, we assessed the cytotoxicity of MHY2233 toward EPCs. The cells were treated with different concentrations of MHY2233 for 24 h. MHY2233 was not toxic to the cells up to 1 μM, but concentrations greater than 1 μM were found to be cytotoxic (Figure 2(c)). We also checked the cytotoxicity of resveratrol (a known SIRT1 activator) and EX527 (a known SIRT1 inhibitor) in EPCs and found that resveratrol and EX527 were not toxic up to 10 μM and 5 μM, respectively (Supplementary Figure S2). Then, we quantified the mRNA levels of different sirtuin family members (SIRT1 to SIRT7) in young and senescent EPCs and found that SIRT1 and SIRT6 mRNA decreased significantly in senescent EPCs, whereas SIRT4 mRNA increased significantly (Figure 2(d)). After treating the cells with 1 μM MHY2233, we found that the mRNA levels of SIRT1 and SIRT6 were increased, whereas those of SIRT4 and SIRT5 were significantly decreased compared to the corresponding levels in the DMSO group (control). There was no significant change in the mRNA levels of SIRT2, SIRT3, and SIRT7 (Figure 2(e)). Furthermore, we measured SIRT1 deacetylase activity after MHY2233 treatment using a commercially available kit and found that MHY2233 induced more SIRT1 deacetylase activity than the positive control, resveratrol (Figure 2(f)). Thus, these results suggest that MHY2233 is a new potent compound that activates SIRT1.

3.3. Rescue of Replicative Senescence in EPCs by MHY2233 Treatment via SIRT1 Signaling

To determine the role of MHY2233 in the replicative senescence of EPCs, senescent EPCs were treated with MHY2233 in a concentration-dependent manner and senescence markers, including SA-β-gal activity, were measured. The results show that MHY2233 treatment significantly decreased the percentage of SA-β-gal-positive cells concentration-dependently (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). To establish the role of MHY2233 in preventing replicative senescence of EPCs, SIRT1 protein and mRNA levels were assessed in EPCs after concentration-dependent treatment with MHY2233. SIRT1 protein and mRNA levels both were upregulated with increasing concentrations of MHY2233 (Figure 3(c) and Supplementary Figure S3A). Furthermore, treatment with MHY2233 decreased the mRNA levels of p16, p53, and p21 (Supplementary Figure S3B, C, and D). Collectively, these data indicate that MHY2233 treatment increases SIRT1 gene expression and decreases senescent markers in a concentration-dependent manner, which highlights the role of MHY2233 in rescuing replicative EPC senescence.

To compare the effect of the chronic treatment of MHY2233 with that of resveratrol and EX527, EPCs were treated with low concentrations. In this experiment, the mRNA and protein levels of SIRT1 were increased by MHY2233 and resveratrol, but were decreased by EX527 (Figures 3(d) and 3(h)). The protein and mRNA levels of SIRT1 after MHY2233 treatment were greater than those after resveratrol treatment, even though the concentration of resveratrol (100 nM) was much higher than that of MHY2233 (10 nM). Similarly, the mRNA levels of p16, p21, and p53 were decreased by MHY2233 and resveratrol treatment but were increased by treatment with the SIRT1 inhibitor, EX527, when compared with that of DMSO treatment alone (Figures 3(e), 3(f), and 3(g)). The protein levels of Ac-p53, p16INK4a, and p21 were significantly decreased by MHY2233 and resveratrol, but as expected, they were increased by EX527. Moreover, the protein level of FOXO3a was significantly increased by MHY2233 and resveratrol, whereas it was decreased by EX527 (Figure 3(h)). Immunocytochemistry of senescent EPCs treated with DMSO and MHY2233 confirmed the respective changes in the expression of SIRT1, Ac-p53, p21, and p16INK4a in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (Supplementary Figure S4). These results signify that MHY2233 decreases the replicative senescence of EPCs by stimulating SIRT1 activity and SIRT1 gene expression.

3.4. MHY2233 Attenuates Oxidative Stress-Mediated Senescence in EPCs

The cellular ROS levels of young EPCs and senescent EPCs were determined using carboxyl H2DFFDA staining and FACS, and we found that the senescent EPCs had significantly elevated ROS levels compared to those of the young EPCs (Figure 4(a)). To determine the effect of the long-term treatment of MHY2233, resveratrol, and EX527 on EPCs, the percentage of apoptotic cells was determined. The results show that MHY2233 and resveratrol significantly reduced the percentage of apoptotic cells, whereas the percentage was increased by EX527 (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). EPCs were treated with H2O2 to mimic oxidative stress conditions. Cellular ROS with or without H2O2 treatment were measured. H2O2 treatment increased the cellular ROS levels in EPCs. After cotreatment of EPCs with H2O2 and DMSO, MHY2233, resveratrol, or EX527, cellular ROS levels were quantified. Cellular ROS levels decreased with MHY2233 and resveratrol treatment, but increased significantly with EX527 treatment, when compared to the levels with DMSO treatment (Figure 4(d)). The percentage of apoptotic cells was assessed after cotreatment with H2O2 and DMSO, MHY2233, resveratrol, or EX527. The percentage of apoptotic cells increased dramatically in the H2O2-treated group compared to that in the untreated group. There was no significant difference in the percentage of apoptotic cells between the H2O2-treated group and the H2O2 and DMSO-treated group. The MHY2233-treated group had fewer apoptotic cells than the resveratrol-treated group did. However, the EX527-treated group contained a markedly increased percentage of apoptotic cells (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)). This indicates that MHY2233 is more efficient in protecting EPCs from oxidative stress than resveratrol. MHY2233 treatment also decreased the mRNA levels of various SASPs, namely, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1α, and IL-1β (Figure 4(g)). MHY2233 also increased the phosphorylation of eNOS on serine 1177 (Figure 4(h)). Thus, MHY2233 is essential to protect EPCs from oxidative stress, and it prevents cell apoptosis by increasing eNOS phosphorylation and downregulating SASPs through the activation of SIRT1.

3.5. Effect of MHY2233 on Cell Proliferation

To evaluate the effect of MHY2233 on cell proliferation, a cell counting method was used. The cells were collected after treating with trypsin-EDTA and were stained with trypan blue. The unstained cells after 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of MHY2233 treatment were counted. Cell proliferation was enhanced statistically by MHY2233 treatment. The proliferation rate was similar to that with the activator of SIRT1, resveratrol. However, the inhibitor of SIRT1, EX527, decreased cell proliferation when compared with that of DMSO (Figure 5(a)). To determine the reason for the increased cell proliferation, different phases of the cell cycle in different treatment groups were analyzed. MHY2233 decreased the cells in the G0 phase of the cell cycle and increased those in the G1 phase. Moreover, MHY2233 significantly increased the number of cells in the S/G2/M phase of the cell cycle in a similar manner as that of resveratrol. EX527 increased the cells in the G0 phase and decreased those in the G1 and S/G2/M phases of the cell cycle (Figure 5(b)). This was further supported by western blot data of the cell cycle proteins cyclin D1 and cyclin E. MHY2233 and resveratrol increased the protein expression of both cyclins, whereas EX527 decreased their expression when compared with that of DMSO treatment alone (Figure 5(c)). Thus, these data indicate that MHY2233 increases cell proliferation of senescent EPCs by upregulating cell cycle proteins (cyclin D1 and cyclin E) and increasing cell cycle progression.

3.6. Effect of MHY2233 on Angiogenesis Potential

To study the effect of MHY2233 on the functional activities of senescent EPCs, their tube formation capacity on Matrigel®, Transwell® cell migration, and scratch wound healing were assessed. MHY2233 and resveratrol increased the tube-forming capacity, tube length, and number of tube branches formed on Matrigel®. The SIRT1 inhibitor reduced the tube formation, tube length, and number of branches formed (Figures 5(d), 5(e), and 5(f)). Moreover, for Transwell® migration, the number of migrated cells was statistically increased by MHY2233 and resveratrol treatment compared with that of DMSO and was decreased by EX527 treatment (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). In the scratch wound healing assay, MHY2233 significantly increased the percentage of the area containing migrating cells in a similar manner to that of resveratrol, when compared to that of DMSO. The inhibitor of SIRT1 significantly decreased the migrated area compared to that of control wells (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). We measured the mRNA level of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and found that MHY2233 increased the mRNA levels of both VEGFR2 and CXCR4 (Figure 6(e)). These increased mRNA levels might be a possible reason for increased migration and tube-forming capacity in senescent EPCs.

In summary, MHY2233 activates SIRT1 activity and upregulates SIRT1 expression. During aging or stress, SIRT1 deacetylase activity increases the activity of FOXO3a, which translocates into the nucleus to increase SIRT1 gene expression. SIRT1 regulates eNOS activity to produce nitric oxide and reduce ROS levels in the endothelium, thus preventing oxidative stress-induced vascular aging. Moreover, SIRT1 blocks the senescence markers, p16INK4a, p53, and p21, as well as other SASPs, and aids in the prevention of vascular aging. A schematic diagram that shows a possible mechanism of MHY2233 activity to prevent senescence in EPCs is presented in Figure 7.

4. Discussion

This study for the first time demonstrated a new potent SIRT1 activator, MHY2233, to prevent replicative senescence and oxidative stress-induced senescence in cultured human EPCs. The major finding is that MHY2233 not only increases SIRT1 activity but also increases SIRT1 gene expression in EPCs with chronic treatment. Moreover, it reduces the expression of cell cycle arrest proteins (acetylated p53, p16INK4a, and p21) and enhances functional activities of senescent EPCs (migration, proliferation, and tube formation capacity). Likewise, MHY2233 decreases ROS formation in senescent EPCs and decreases the percentage of apoptotic cells. Consistently, it reduces cellular ROS with H2O2-induced oxidative stress, protects EPCs from oxidative stress, and prevents premature senescence. Furthermore, MHY2233 minimizes SA-β-gal-positive cells and downregulates SASPs, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-1α, and IL-1β, in senescent EPCs. This reveals the potential effect of MHY2233 in preventing vascular senescence.

Aging is a major risk factor for the development of different types of CVDs [19] including atherosclerosis that leads to stroke and myocardial infraction. Various studies have suggested that EPCs show impaired functions and diminished numbers with age [2022]. Damaged endothelium is an important indicator of aging-related vascular diseases [19, 23]. Among the sirtuin family members, SIRT1 plays an important role especially in endothelial cells for angiogenesis and vasculogenesis [23]. SIRT1 is associated with lifespan extension and other antiaging effects. The SIRT1 activator, SRT1720, increases arterial SIRT1 activity and expression [24]. Donato et al. reported that SIRT1 expression and activity decrease with age in the vasculature of both humans and mice [25]. Likewise, Wang et al. reported that endothelial SIRT1 expression is decreased in senescent EPCs [26, 27]. Our investigation showed that SIRT1 mRNA and protein expression levels are decreased in senescent EPCs.

Previous studies have shown that p53, p16INK4a, and p21 are key components of cellular senescence [28]. p21 is a known target of p53, and therefore, p21 expression induced by p53 will inhibit CDKs and mediate cell cycle arrest during senescence [29]. The expression of another CDK inhibitor, p16INK4a, also contributes to age-dependent EPC senescence [30]. p53 acetylation promotes the transactivation of many genes controlling cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. SIRT1 inhibits p53 transcription of its downstream effector p21 by deacetylation of p53 at the C-terminal lysine K382 [31, 32]. Moreover, SIRT1 significantly reduces the levels of the CDK inhibitor, p16INK4a [30, 33]. Consistently, this study showed that MHY2233 improved SIRT1 deacetylase activity. SIRT1 activity enhanced the deacetylation of p53 at K382, resulting in low levels of acetylated p53. Moreover, upon chronic treatment with MHY2233, upregulated SIRT1 expression suppressed the p21 expression induced by p53. Likewise, MHY2233 blocked the CDK inhibitor, p16INK4a, and prevented cellular senescence in EPCs by activating SIRT1. Stimulation of EPCs with the SIRT1 activator, resveratrol, upregulated SIRT1 expression and downregulated p53 acetylation, thereby blocking the CDK inhibitors, p21 and p16INK4a. Moreover, the SIRT1 antagonist, EX527, blocked SIRT1 expression and thus upregulated senescence markers, such as acetylated p53, p21, and p16INK4a. Therefore, MHY2233 stimulated SIRT1 expression and prevented EPC replicative senescence.

The mechanism of SIRT1-activating compounds (STACs), such as resveratrol and SRT1720, to increase SIRT1 expression is unclear. There is still controversy whether STACs have a direct or indirect effect on SIRT1 expression [3436]. SRT1720 [24] and resveratrol were shown to enhance SIRT1 expression and SIRT1 activity [37]. However, other studies suggested that SIRT1 activating compounds (e.g., SRT1720 and resveratrol) are not direct SIRT1 activators [38]. Subsequently, it was confirmed that resveratrol and other STACs activate SIRT1 activity through allosteric enzymatic regulation [34, 3941]. Among the FOXO subclass isoforms, FOXO1 and FOXO3a are predominant in human endothelial cells [42]. Under stress, FOXO3a translocates into the nucleus [43]. FOXO3a is the target of SIRT1 deacetylase activity [35]. In human cells, FOXO3a interacts with p53 response elements in the promoter region of SIRT1 and increases SIRT1 gene expression upon stress or DNA damage [4345]. Current results suggest that MHY2233 and resveratrol increase SIRT1 deacetylase activity and, during stress or aging, SIRT1 activity upregulates the expression of FOXO3a. Then, FOXO3a is translocated into the nucleus where it interacts with the proximal promoter of SIRT1 and increases SIRT1 gene transcription. In addition, the inhibitor of SIRT1, EX527, decreases FOXO3a expression and thereby decreases the expression of SIRT1.

Several studies have suggested the role of oxidative stress and ROS in cellular senescence and endothelial dysfunction [8, 46, 47]. Aging of endothelial cells leads to increased ROS formation [48]. Fu et al. reported that stress-induced premature senescence of EPCs caused by oxidative stress was characterized by DNA damage. EPC senescence through the activation of ROS signaling leads to cell cycle arrest. Cyclin D1 is a downstream protein of oxidative stress-induced EPC senescence [49]. ROS, such as superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical, and singlet oxygen, are generally viewed as regulators of aging processes [48]. SIRT1 plays a significant role in oxidative stress resistance via SIRT1/eNOS pathways [50]. Resveratrol enhances eNOS gene expression by stimulating endothelial nitric oxide generation [51]. Resveratrol induces eNOS enzymatic activity by enhancing eNOS phosphorylation [42, 52]. The present study showed that MHY2233 protects EPCs from apoptosis caused by ROS. MHY2233 increases eNOS activity through phosphorylation, by activating SIRT1. Furthermore, the SIRT1 antagonist, EX527, decreases the phosphorylation of eNOS. Thus, this study confirmed that MHY2233 can prevent EPC aging caused by oxidative stress and ROS generation by activating the SIRT1/eNOS pathway.

Cellular senescence is the stage where cells can no longer replicate. It is characterized by irreversible cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase. Senescent cells show different morphological characteristics, such as an increase in size, a flattened appearance, and the presence of large vacuoles. Another important characteristic of senescent cells is the expression of SA-β-gal [53]. Senescent cells secrete many soluble factors that are called SASPs. IL-6, IL-8, IL-1α, and IL-1β are key SASPs [53, 54]. The mRNA levels of IL-6 and IL-8 are increased after the induction of senescence. Hayakawa et al. reported that SIRT1 binds to the promoter region of SASP components and protects against aging by suppressing SASP expression through epigenetic gene regulation [54]. Likewise, our study indicates that the SA-β-gal enzyme and SASPs, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-1α, and IL-1β, were upregulated in senescent EPCs. Upon treatment with MHY2233, there were significant reductions in the expression of SASPs and the number of SA-β-gal-positive cells. This suggests that MHY2233 prevents senescence in EPCs by stimulating SIRT1.

Several previous studies mentioned that the functional activities of EPCs (e.g., cell proliferation, cell migration, and tube formation) were reduced in replicative aging or cellular senescence [26, 55]. Our results also demonstrated that senescent EPCs had impaired functions, namely, proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. Li et al. reported that SIRT1 promoted EPC migration and proliferation by activation of eNOS expression [56]. SIRT1 promotes angiogenesis by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression [26]. In the present study, MHY2233 and resveratrol upregulated eNOS activity in senescent EPCs and therefore increased angiogenesis and cell migration. Moreover, MHY2233 upregulated the expression of the cell cycle proteins, cyclin D1 and cyclin E, stimulated progression into the S/G2/M phase of the cell cycle, and promoted cell proliferation in senescent EPCs. In addition, MHY2233 increased the mRNA levels of VEGFR2 and CXCR4, thus enhancing the angiogenic capacity of senescent EPCs. Treatment with the SIRT1 antagonist, EX527, decreased the cell proliferation, migration, and tube-forming capacity of EPCs. Thus, collectively, it can be concluded that MHY2233 increases the functional activities of EPCs by activating the SIRT1/eNOS pathway and upregulating cyclin D1 and cyclin E protein levels.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the role of MHY2233 in preventing senescence in human endothelial progenitor cells. The antiaging effect of MHY2233 is mainly due to SIRT1 deacetylase activity and upregulation of SIRT1 expression. MHY2233 was found to be highly effective in reducing replicative senescence and oxidative stress-induced senescence in EPCs. Moreover, MHY2233 increases the functional activities of senescent EPCs, such as cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. This study reveals that MHY2233 is more potent than the commercially available SIRT1 activator, resveratrol. Therefore, the novel compound MHY2233 can be used as a potent therapeutic target for the treatment of aging- and age-associated cardiovascular diseases.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article and within the supplementary file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Shreekrishna Lamichane and Sang Hong Baek contributed equally.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOE) (MSIP; NRF-2015R1A5A2009656 and 2018R1A2B6006380) and a Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI14C1863, HI17C1662, HI18C2458010018, and HI18C2459010018), funded by the Korean Government.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1: mRNA levels of SIRT1, p53, p21, and p16 in young and senescent EPCs were determined using qRT-PCR ( per group). and vs. young EPCs by unpaired Student’s -test. Supplementary Figure S2: EPCs were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with different concentrations of resveratrol and EX527 for 24 h ( per group). (A) Cytotoxicity assay of resveratrol and (B) cytotoxicity assay of EX527 determined using WST-8 assay ( per group). , , and vs. DMSO (control) by a one-way ANOVA test. Supplementary Figure S3: relative mRNA levels of (A) SIRT1, (B) p16, (C) p53, and (D) p21 in senescent EPCs treated with MHY2233 in a concentration-dependent manner (10 nM, 100 nM, and 1 μM) using qRT-PCR ( per group). , , and vs. DMSO (control) by a one-way ANOVA test. Supplementary Figure S4: representative confocal images of immunofluorescence staining for SIRT1, p16, ac-p53, and p21 (red) in senescent EPCs treated with DMSO or 10 nM MHY2233 (). The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars 20 μM. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. E. Shantsila, T. Watson, and G. Y. H. Lip, “Endothelial progenitor cells in cardiovascular disorders,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 741–752, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Lemcke, N. Voronina, G. Steinhoff, and R. David, “Recent progress in stem cell modification for cardiac regeneration,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2018, Article ID 1909346, 22 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Sun, X. Li, M. Liu, Y. Zeng, S. Chen, and P. Zhang, “Advances in stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease (Review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Yu, K. Lu, J. Zhu, and J. Wang, “Stem cell therapy for ischemic heart diseases,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 135–154, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Altabas, K. Altabas, and L. Kirigin, “Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in ageing and age-related diseases: how currently available treatment modalities affect EPC biology, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular outcomes,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 159, pp. 49–62, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. R. Balistreri, S. Buffa, C. Pisano, D. Lio, G. Ruvolo, and G. Mazzesi, “Are endothelial progenitor cells the real solution for cardiovascular diseases? Focus on controversies and perspectives,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 835934, 17 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Zhu, J. Wang, M. Song et al., “Overexpression of Jagged1 ameliorates aged rat-derived endothelial progenitor cell functions and improves its transfusion efficiency for rat balloon-induced arterial injury,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 41, pp. 241–258, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Guo, P. Li, L. Gao et al., “Kallistatin reduces vascular senescence and aging by regulating microRNA-34a-SIRT1 pathway,” Aging Cell, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 837–846, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Kida and M. S. Goligorsky, “Sirtuins, cell senescence, and vascular aging,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 634–641, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Chen, H. Liu, X. Wang, H. Zhang, E. Liu, and X. Su, “Homocysteine up-regulates endothelin type A receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells through Sirt1/ERK1/2 signaling pathway,” Microvascular Research, vol. 114, pp. 34–40, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Grabowska, E. Sikora, and A. Bielak-Zmijewska, “Sirtuins, a promising target in slowing down the ageing process,” Biogerontology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 447–476, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Chen, X. Liu, W. Zhu et al., “SIRT1 ameliorates age-related senescence of mesenchymal stem cells via modulating telomere shelterin,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 103, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. S. Kwon and M. Ott, “The ups and downs of SIRT1,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 517–525, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. J. Kim, H. J. An, D. H. Kim et al., “Novel SIRT1 activator MHY2233 improves glucose tolerance and reduces hepatic lipid accumulation in db/db mice,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 684–688, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Wang, H. Z. Chen, X. Lv, and D. P. Liu, “SIRT1 as a novel potential treatment target for vascular aging and age-related vascular diseases,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Nollet, V. Y. Hoymans, I. R. Rodrigus et al., “Accelerated cellular senescence as underlying mechanism for functionally impaired bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in ischemic heart disease,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 260, pp. 138–146, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. C. Wang and M. Bennett, “Aging and atherosclerosis: mechanisms, functional consequences, and potential therapeutics for cellular senescence,” Circulation Research, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 245–259, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Glozak, N. Sengupta, X. Zhang, and E. Seto, “Acetylation and deacetylation of non-histone proteins,” Gene, vol. 363, pp. 15–23, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. X. Yang, Y. Y. Pan, X. X. Wang, Y. G. Qiu, and W. Mao, “Endothelial progenitor cells in age-related vascular remodeling,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 786–795, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. A. Williamson, A. Hamilton, J. A. Reynolds et al., “Age-related impairment of endothelial progenitor cell migration correlates with structural alterations of heparan sulfate proteoglycans,” Aging Cell, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 139–147, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Thum, S. Hoeber, S. Froese et al., “Age-dependent impairment of endothelial progenitor cells is corrected by growth-hormone-mediated increase of insulin-like growth-factor-1,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 434–443, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Heiss, S. Keymel, U. Niesler, J. Ziemann, M. Kelm, and C. Kalka, “Impaired progenitor cell activity in age-related endothelial dysfunction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1441–1448, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Guo, A. Xu, and Y. Wang, “SIRT1 in endothelial cells as a novel target for the prevention of early vascular aging,” Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 465–473, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. B. Gano, A. J. Donato, H. M. Pasha, C. M. Hearon Jr., A. L. Sindler, and D. R. Seals, “The SIRT1 activator SRT1720 reverses vascular endothelial dysfunction, excessive superoxide production, and inflammation with aging in mice,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 307, no. 12, pp. H1754–H1763, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. J. Donato, K. A. Magerko, B. R. Lawson, J. R. Durrant, L. A. Lesniewski, and D. R. Seals, “SIRT-1 and vascular endothelial dysfunction with ageing in mice and humans,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 589, no. 18, pp. 4545–4554, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Li, Q. Cao, L. Huang, and S. Chen, “MeCP2-mediated epigenetic regulation in senescent endothelial progenitor cells,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 87, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Z. Wan, P. Gao, S. Zhou et al., “SIRT1-mediated epigenetic downregulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 prevents vascular endothelial replicative senescence,” Aging Cell, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 890–899, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Milanovic, D. N. Y. Fan, D. Belenki et al., “Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness,” Nature, vol. 553, no. 7686, pp. 96–100, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Rosso, A. Balsamo, R. Gambino et al., “p53 Mediates the accelerated onset of senescence of endothelial progenitor cells in diabetes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 7, pp. 4339–4347, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. P. F. Vassallo, S. Simoncini, I. Ligi et al., “Accelerated senescence of cord blood endothelial progenitor cells in premature neonates is driven by SIRT1 decreased expression,” Blood, vol. 123, no. 13, pp. 2116–2126, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. T. Lee and W. Gu, “SIRT1: Regulator of p53 deacetylation,” Genes Cancer, vol. 4, no. 3-4, pp. 112–117, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. J. Kim, J. H. Kho, M. R. Kang, and S. J. Um, “Active regulator of SIRT1 cooperates with SIRT1 and facilitates suppression of p53 activity,” Molecular Cell, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 277–290, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Huang, Q. Gan, L. Han et al., “SIRT1 overexpression antagonizes cellular senescence with activated ERK/S6k1 signaling in human diploid fibroblasts,” PLoS One, vol. 3, no. 3, article e1710, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. P. Hubbard, A. P. Gomes, H. Dai et al., “Evidence for a common mechanism of SIRT1 regulation by allosteric activators,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6124, pp. 1216–1219, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. R. Revollo and X. Li, “The ways and means that fine tune Sirt1 activity,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 160–167, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Hu, J. Liu, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, “The controversial links among calorie restriction, SIRT1, and resveratrol,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 250–256, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. C. Chao, Y. J. Chen, K. H. Huang et al., “Induction of sirtuin-1 signaling by resveratrol induces human chondrosarcoma cell apoptosis and exhibits antitumor activity,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 3180, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Pacholec, J. E. Bleasdale, B. Chrunyk et al., “SRT1720, SRT2183, SRT1460, and resveratrol are not direct activators of SIRT1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 11, pp. 8340–8351, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Cao, M. Wang, X. Qiu et al., “Structural basis for allosteric, substrate-dependent stimulation of SIRT1 activity by resveratrol,” Genes & Development, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1316–1325, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Kumar, L. Nigam, A. P. Singh, K. Singh, N. Subbarao, and S. Dey, “Design, synthesis of allosteric peptide activator for human SIRT1 and its biological evaluation in cellular model of Alzheimer's disease,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 127, pp. 909–916, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Gut and E. Verdin, “Rejuvenating SIRT1 activators,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 635–637, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N. Xia, S. Strand, F. Schlufter et al., “Role of SIRT1 and FOXO factors in eNOS transcriptional activation by resveratrol,” Nitric Oxide, vol. 32, pp. 29–35, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Brunet, L. B. Sweeney, J. F. Sturgill et al., “Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5666, pp. 2011–2015, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Nemoto, M. M. Fergusson, and T. Finkel, “Nutrient availability regulates SIRT1 through a forkhead-dependent pathway,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5704, pp. 2105–2108, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. Gao, Q. Kong, K. Kemp, Y.-S. Zhao, and D. Fang, “Analysis of sirtuin 1 expression reveals a molecular explanation of IL-2–mediated reversal of T-cell tolerance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 899–904, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Ungvari, G. Kaley, R. de Cabo, W. E. Sonntag, and A. Csiszar, “Mechanisms of vascular aging: new perspectives,” The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, vol. 65A, no. 10, pp. 1028–1041, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. Imanishi, C. Moriwaki, T. Hano, and I. Nishio, “Endothelial progenitor cell senescence is accelerated in both experimental hypertensive rats and patients with essential hypertension,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1831–1837, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Haendeler, J.̈. Hoffmann, J. F. Diehl et al., “Antioxidants inhibit nuclear export of telomerase reverse transcriptase and delay replicative senescence of endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 768–775, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Fu, B. Li, Y. Sun, G. Ma, and Y. Yao, “Bradykinin inhibits oxidative stress-induced senescence of endothelial progenitor cells through the B2R/AKT/RB and B2R/EGFR/RB signal pathways,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 28, pp. 24675–24689, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. Zhang, Q. Huang, Z. Zeng, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Chen, “Sirt1 Inhibits Oxidative Stress in Vascular Endothelial Cells,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 7543973, 8 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Wallerath, G.̈. Deckert, T. Ternes et al., “Resveratrol, a polyphenolic phytoalexin present in red wine, enhances expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 1652–1658, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. M. Klinge, N. S. Wickramasinghe, M. M. Ivanova, and S. M. Dougherty, “Resveratrol stimulates nitric oxide production by increasing estrogen receptor α-Src-caveolin-1 interaction and phosphorylation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 2185–2197, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. Y. González-Puertos, L. Á. Maciel-Barón, B. A. Barajas-Gómez, N. E. López-Diazguerrero, and M. Königsberg, “Senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) involvement in the development of cancer, aging and age related diseases,” Gaceta Médica de México, vol. 151, pp. 460–468, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  54. T. Hayakawa, M. Iwai, S. Aoki et al., “SIRT1 suppresses the senescence-associated secretory phenotype through epigenetic gene regulation,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 1, article e0116480, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. O. M. Tepper, R. D. Galiano, J. M. Capla et al., “Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 22, pp. 2781–2786, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. W. Li, D. Du, H. Wang et al., “Silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) promotes the migration and proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells through the PI3K/Akt/eNOS signaling pathway,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2274–2287, 2015. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Shreekrishna Lamichane et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1341
Downloads860
Citations

Related articles