Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Interplay between ROS and Autophagy in Cancer and Aging: From Molecular Mechanisms to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 9675450 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9675450

Liubing Hu, Yan Wang, Zui Chen, Liangshun Fu, Sheng Wang, Xinyue Zhang, Pengchao Zhang, Xueping Lu, Huiyang Jie, Manmei Li, Yifei Wang, Zhong Liu, "Hsp90 Inhibitor SNX-2112 Enhances TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis of Human Cervical Cancer Cells via the ROS-Mediated JNK-p53-Autophagy-DR5 Pathway", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 9675450, 26 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9675450

Hsp90 Inhibitor SNX-2112 Enhances TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis of Human Cervical Cancer Cells via the ROS-Mediated JNK-p53-Autophagy-DR5 Pathway

Academic Editor: Marco Cordani
Received23 Aug 2018
Revised08 Nov 2018
Accepted19 Nov 2018
Published25 Mar 2019

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a potent cancer cell apoptosis-inducing factor that can induce apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells. However, resistance to TRAIL in cancer cells is a huge obstacle in creating effective TRAIL-targeted clinical therapies. Thus, agents that can either enhance the effect of TRAIL or overcome its resistance are needed. In this study, we combined TRAIL with SNX-2112, an Hsp90 inhibitor we previously developed, to explore the effect and mechanism that SNX-2112 enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. Our results showed that SNX-2112 markedly enhanced TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity in HeLa cells, and this combination was found to be synergistic. Additionally, we found that SNX-2112 sensitized TRAIL-mediated apoptosis caspase-dependently in TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells. Mechanismly, SNX-2112 downregulated antiapoptosis proteins, including Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and FLIP, promoted the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and increased the expression levels of p-JNK and p53. ROS scavenger NAC rescued SNX-2112/TRAIL-induced apoptosis and suppressed SNX-2112-induced p-JNK and p53. Moreover, SNX-2112 induced the upregulation of death-receptor DR5 in HeLa cells. The silencing of DR5 by siRNA significantly decreased cell apoptosis by the combined effect of SNX-2112 and TRAIL. In addition, SNX-2112 inhibited the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and induced autophagy in HeLa cells. The blockage of autophagy by bafilomycin A1 or Atg7 siRNA abolished SNX-2112-induced upregulation of DR5. Meanwhile, ROS scavenger NAC, JNK inhibitor SP600125, and p53 inhibitor PFTα were used to verify that autophagy-mediated upregulation of DR5 was regulated by the SNX-2112-stimulated activation of the ROS-JNK-p53 signaling pathway. Thus, the combination of SNX-2112 and TRAIL may provide a novel strategy for the treatment of human cervical cancer by overcoming cellular mechanisms of apoptosis resistance.

1. Introduction

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), also known as apo2 ligand, is a member of the TNF family that binds to receptors to selectively target tumor cells while sparing normal cells. As a result, TRAIL and its receptor (TRAIL-R) agonist antibodies are considered attractive candidates for use as anticancer drugs in clinical studies. TRAIL leads to the formation of the death-inducing signal complex (DISC) by interacting with death receptor 4 (DR4) and death receptor 5 (DR5), followed by binding to caspase 8. Caspase 8 is recruited to DISC to activate its proteolytic properties, which induce the activation of protease caspase 3 cascades or Bcl-2 family members, facilitating the cleavage of dead substrates, ultimately leading to apoptosis [1]. Many tumors are susceptible to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, but the development of resistance to TRAIL is also common in many types of cancer [2, 3]. Resistance to TRAIL can result from a wide range of molecular changes: the downregulation of DR4 and DR5 expression and the upregulation of decoy receptors; the overexpression of antiapoptotic molecules, including the caspase 8 inhibitor, Fas-associated death domain-like IL-1-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein (cFLIP), inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members, and Bcl-2 family proteins; the loss of proapoptotic proteins; and the activation of the PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways [48]. Bortezomib and other protease inhibitors have been found to reverse resistance to TRAIL, but have long been considered to be highly toxic [9, 10]. Therefore, there is a great need for anticancer drugs that are able to regulate cancer cell resistance to TRAIL and thus improve the therapeutic effect of TRAIL on tumors through combined treatment.

As molecular chaperones, heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) can help intracellular signal transduction proteins fold, stabilize, and mediate cellular homeostasis, cell survival, and transcriptional regulation. It plays an important role in both normal and stress conditions and in pathological states such as cancer [1113]. In contrast to normal cells, Hsp90 in cancer cells is usually upregulated by exposure to different kinds of stresses, such as acidosis, low oxygen tension, and nutrient deprivation [14, 15]. It has been found that the overexpression of Hsp90 was essential in protecting therapeutic agent-induced apoptosis and could be a potential target molecule for anticancer drugs [16, 17]. One of the challenges of targeted cancer therapies is that the malignant progression of cancer cells is often related to a variety of molecular abnormalities. Hsp90 inhibitors can degrade Hsp90 client proteins (including cancerogenic proteins) by targeting a single protein (Hsp90), thereby affecting several signaling pathways. Hsp90 regulates over 100 client proteins. These client proteins include Akt, Raf-1, IKK, Her2, Cdk4, MMP2, and VEGFR2 and play an important role in tumor cell survival, growth, migration, and angiogenesis [1820]. Besides, inhibition of Hsp90 could increase ER stress to disrupt mitochondrial homeostasis and, thereby, stimulate the production of mitochondrial ROS, leading to the selective killing of cancer cells when compared to normal cells, by elevating ER stress originating from the accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER [2123]. Meanwhile, rational drug combination of prooxidant and antioxidant might be a potential new treatment strategy to combat drug resistance in cancer [22]. In recent years, dozens of Hsp90 have been developed for oncotherapy, including first-generation Hsp90 inhibitors (geldanamycin and its derivatives) and second-generation Hsp90 inhibitors (NVP-AUY922). Geldanamycin 17-AAG (tanespimycin) is a natural product and was the first Hsp90 inhibitor to enter clinical trials [11, 12]. Hsp90 inhibitors have therapeutic applications in melanoma, AML, castrated refractory prostate cancer, NSCLC, and other types of cancers [24]. Nevertheless, there are no FDA-approved Hsp90 inhibitors or standardized experiments that confirm the inhibitory effect of Hsp90. The most significant off-target toxicity of geldanamycin derivatives in clinical use is their hepatotoxicity caused by the benzoquinone moiety. In addition to hepatotoxicity, the ocular and cardiac toxicity of these drugs limits their further clinical development [24, 25].

Geldanamycin or 17-AAG inhibition of Hsp90 has been reported to sensitize some cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis [26, 27]. The combination of 17-AAG and death receptors targeting agent TRAIL can synergistically increase antitumor activity and eliminate resistance to TRAIL in gliomas [28]. In TRAIL-resistant tumor cell lines, such as prostate LNCaP cells, colon cancer HT29, and RKO cells, pre- or coexposure to 17-AAG with TRAIL can induce high levels of cell apoptosis [2931]. Studies have shown that the combination of 17-AAG with TRAIL coinduces apoptosis as a result of the deregulation of NF-κB or Akt cell survival pathways [32, 33].

We have previously proven that SNX-2112 was a novel, highly efficient, and highly selective small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90 that could competitively integrate with the N-terminal ATP-binding site of Hsp90 and exhibit anticancer activity in cancer cells, including breast cancer [34], multiple myeloma [35], melanoma [36, 37], chronic myeloid leukemia [38], esophageal cancer [39], and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [40]. Especially in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, SNX-2112 could induce apoptosis, elevating the role of ER stress [41]. In this study, we attempted to use SNX-2112 in combination with TRAIL to overcome the resistance of cervical cancer HeLa cells to TRAIL-induced cell apoptosis and provided a new therapeutic strategy for the clinical treatment of cervical cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Human cervical cancer cells (HeLa, SiHa, and Caski) were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), stored in liquid nitrogen, and cultured in RPMI-1640 or DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin in 5% CO2 at 37°C.

2.2. Reagents and Antibodies

SNX-2112 was synthesized as previously described in our lab with >98.0% purity [42], dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to obtain a 100 mM stock solution, and stored at −20°C. TRAIL was purchased from Merck Millipore (Waltham, MA, USA). N-Acetyl-cysteine (NAC) and 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) were purchased from the Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Bafilomycin A1 (BFA) was purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Shanghai, China). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Antibodies for GAPDH, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, FLIP, pro-caspase 3, cleaved-caspase 3 (c-caspase 3), cleaved-caspase 8 (c-caspase 8), cleaved-PARP (c-PARP), Akt, p-Akt (Ser473), DR4, DR5, LC3, Beclin1, Atg7, p62, p-mTOR, p-S6, p-4EBP1, p53, p-ERK, ERK, p-p38, p38, p-JNK, and JNK were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST; Beverly, MA, USA).

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay. Exponentially growing cells were plated in 96-well culture plates (5000/well in 100 μL medium) for 24 h and incubated with a series of concentrations of SNX-2112 (0-1 μM) or TRAIL (0-1000 ng/mL) for 48 h. A 10 μL volume of MTT working solution was added to each well for 4 h. After the medium was removed, formazan crystals solubilized in 100 μL DMSO/well, and the absorbance values were assessed at 570 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The inhibition ratio was calculated as follows: (A control – A treated)/A control × 100%, where and are the absorbance of the treated and control groups after a 48 h incubation, respectively.

2.4. Synergy Analysis

The synergistic interaction of SNX-2112 and TRAIL was calculated by using the Chou-Talalay method [4345]. The combination index (CI) was evaluated using CompuSyn software (ComboSyn Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA) for each combination. A fitting curve of CI value data points was plotted according to the data generated by the viability assay using CompuSyn software. When the fitting curve of the drug’s CI value was near or on the additive line (CI ), it represented an additive treatment effect. The fitting curve below or above the additive line represents the synergism or antagonism effect, respectively.

2.5. ROS Detection

Generation of intracellular ROS was detected using DCFH-DA, a dye that detects reactive oxygen species (ROS). After cell treatment, HeLa cells were stained with the DCFH-DA (20 μM) fluorescent dye for 20 min. Fluorescence was measured with an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan).

2.6. Western Blotting Analysis

To assess the effect of SNX-2112 on TRAIL-induced protein activation, HeLa cells were collected and lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer for 30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation at 12000 g for 20 min, the supernatant was pipetted for analysis with a bicinchoninic acid assay. Equivalent amounts (>30 μg) of protein were separated by 10-15% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were blocked in 5% skimmed milk dissolved in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) at room temperature for 1 h. Membranes were then incubated with the corresponding primary antibody (1 : 1000) at 4°C overnight, then washed in TBST and probed with secondary antibody (1 : 6000-1 : 8000) in TBST for 2 h at room temperature. Protein expression was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (4 A Biotech Co. Ltd., Beijing, China). GAPDH was used as a loading control.

2.7. Flow Cytometry for Apoptosis Measurement

Cell apoptosis was quantified by flow cytometry using an Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) staining kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Cells were seeded at cell/mL in 6-well plates for 24 h, then exposed to the indicated concentrations of SNX-2112 or TRAIL alone or in combination for 48 h. Cell samples were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, cells were washed and resuspended in 500 μL PBS, then incubated with 10 μL PI and 10 μL Annexin V-FITC at room temperature in the dark for 15 min. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer with CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson, Mississauga, CA, USA).

2.8. Immunofluorescence Analysis of the Expression of Cell Surface DR5

To detect the cellular expression of DR5, HeLa cells plated in chamber slides were treated with the indicated concentrations of SNX-2112/TRAIL for 48 h at 37°C. Samples were processed as described before [46]. Briefly, after fixing, permeabilizing, and blocking, the cells were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with an antibody against DR5 (1 : 50, Cell Signaling Technology). The cells were then probed with an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1 : 1000) for 1 h. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. Finally, cells were washed, and fluorescence was examined by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Nikon, Japan).

2.9. Transfection of siRNA

Transfection of HeLa cells was conducted with siRNA transfection reagent of jetPRIME (Polyplus, New York, NY, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. High-purity controls (scrambled RNA), along with DR5, DR4, and Atg7, were obtained from GenePharma. The targeting sequences of the siRNA constructs were DR5 siRNA, 5-UUCUGGGAACACGAGCAACAG-3; DR4 siRNA-1, 5-AAGAACCA GCAGAGGUCACAA-3; DR4 siRNA-2, 5-CACCAAUGCUUCCAACAAUdTdT-3; Atg7 siRNNA-1, 5-CCCUGUACUCCUCAACAAG-3; and Atg7 siRNA-2, 5-GCCUCUCUAUGAGUUUGAA-3.

2.10. Detection of JC-1

HeLa cells () were seeded in 60 mm Petri dishes for a day before the experiment. After treatment with SNX-2112 alone or in combination with TRAIL at the indicated concentrations for 48 h, cells were harvested, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and incubated with JC-1 (10 μg/mL) in the dark for 15 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed three times with ice-cold PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry using emission wavelengths of 590 nm and 525 nm.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as the , and three independent experiments were performed to confirm the reliability of the data. For groups of two, statistical analysis was carried out by using two-tailed unpaired Student’s test. For groups of three or more, comparison was carried out using one-way ANOVA multiple. values <0.05 and <0.01 were considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. SNX-2112 and TRAIL Synergistically Induce Cytotoxicity in Cervical Cancer HeLa Cells

To investigate whether SNX-2112 could synergize with TRAIL to suppress human cervical cancer cell viability, a range of cervical cancer cell lines, including HeLa, SiHa, Caski cells, were tested. Before testing the combined effect of SNX-2112 and TRAIL therapy, we first evaluated the cytotoxicity of TRAIL monotherapy in three human cervical cancer cell lines by means of a MTT assay. Our data showed that, at concentrations of 1000 ng/mL or lower, TRAIL showed no significant antitumor effect on HeLa and SiHa cells, indicating that both cervical cell lines either had low sensitivity or were resistant to TRAIL monotherapy (Figure 1(b)). Both types of cervical cells were assessed with SNX-2112 monotherapy, and similar results were found (Figure 1(c)). Meanwhile, when the cells were cotreated with 125 or 250 nM of SNX-2112 and 200 ng/mL of TRAIL for 48 h, cell viability of both cell lines was markedly inhibited (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)).

For the two cell lines, HeLa and SiHa cells, the combination of both agents within a certain concentration range was the most effective treatment for blocking cell growth rather than the use of either agent alone. To determine the effect of a combined treatment of SNX-2112 and TRAIL, a combination study was performed. We obtained the fitting curves of CI value data points, and a fitted curve analysis was performed using CompuSyn software to define the interactions between SNX-2112 and TRAIL in HeLa and SiHa cells. According to the Chou–Talalay method, CIs were always less than 1 for the combination treatments in HeLa cell lines, indicating that cotreatment of SNX-2112 and TRAIL led to synergistic inhibitory effects on cell proliferation in HeLa cell lines, but not in SiHa cell lines (Figures 1(f) and 1(g)). Based on the above observations, we concluded that SNX-2112 markedly enhanced TRAIL-induced cytotoxicity in human cervical cancer cells and that the combination was considered synergistic in HeLa cells.

3.2. SNX-2112 Sensitizes TRAIL-Mediated Apoptosis via the Activation of Caspases in TRAIL-Resistant HeLa Cells

To investigate whether SNX-2112 could sensitize HeLa cancer cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, HeLa cells were initially treated with 125 nM SNX-2112 or 200 ng/mL TRAIL alone or in combination for 48 h. Their morphology was found to be significantly affected by the combined treatment compared with the control or monotherapy group (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Apoptosis characteristics, including cell shrinkage, apoptotic bodies, and detachment from the plate, were observed more generally in HeLa cells treated with both SNX-2112 and TRAIL (Figure 2(a)). Furthermore, the results of flow cytometry analysis for apoptosis showed that SNX-2112 or TRAIL alone induced 21.4 or 13.5% apoptosis, individually, and that the combination of treatment with SNX-2112 and TRAIL augmented apoptosis to 90.0%. Nevertheless, the synergistic effect of this treatment was abolished by pretreatment with Z-VAD-fmk, the cell-permeable pan caspase inhibitor (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). Change in the mitochondrial membrane potential () is an early event preceding caspase activation and is regarded as a hallmark of apoptosis [47]. Therefore, we measured in TRAIL/SNX-2112-treated HeLa cells using the membrane-permeable JC-1 dye. As shown in Figures 2(e) and 2(f), treatment with TRAIL and SNX-2112 induced a marked increase in JC-1-related green fluorescence in HeLa cells.

To investigate the mechanisms behind the role of SNX-2112 in the intensification of TRAIL-induced apoptosis, we quantified multiple cell death pathway components that could be influenced by SNX-2112. The results indicated that the expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL was suppressed (Figure 2(g)). As single agents, SNX-2112 or TRAIL reduced the expression level of FLIP and induced low levels of caspase 3 and 8 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, whereas their combination induced profoundly higher processing of these proteins (Figure 2(h)). Furthermore, consistent with the flow cytometry analysis, the upregulation of apoptosis-associated proteins (c-caspase 3 and 8 and c-PARP) was abolished by pretreatment with Z-VAD-fmk (Figure 2(i)). At least in part, these results may help to clarify the synergistic effect. Taken together, these experimental data suggested that SNX-2112 could sensitize TRAIL-mediated apoptosis via the activation of caspases in TRAIL-resistant HeLa cells.

3.3. SNX-2112-Induced Accumulation of ROS Is Pivotal for SNX-2112-Stimulated TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis

To investigate whether ROS contributed to SNX-2112-enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis, we measured the level of ROS in HeLa cells. In the DCFH-DA-based fluorescent assay, HeLa cells were treated with SNX-2112, and green fluorescence was found to markedly increase in a time-dependent manner (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), suggesting the production of ROS in HeLa cells. However, we found that treatment with TRAIL alone could not increase the level of ROS in HeLa cells (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)).

Notably, flow cytometry analysis showed that pretreatment with NAC, a ROS scavenger, significantly rescued SNX-2112/TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells (Figures 3(e) and 3(f)). Sensitization to apoptosis was completely abolished by NAC. These results suggest that SNX-2112-induced ROS plays a key role in apoptosis induced by treatment with a combination of SNX-2112 and TRAIL.

3.4. DR5 Upregulation Mediates SNX-2112-Stimulated TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis

Two TRAIL receptors, DR4 and DR5, are known to trigger apoptotic signals upon TRAIL binding via the functional death domain. In certain cancer cell lines, reduced expression of TRAIL receptors DR4 and DR5 and/or upregulation of the decoy receptors DcR1 and DcR2 have been defined as the main causes of TRAIL resistance [48]. To further explore the molecular mechanisms underlying ROS-mediated TRAIL sensitization in HeLa cells, we investigated whether SNX-2112-induced TRAIL receptor upregulation and its subsequent increased expression contributed to synergistic apoptosis caused by the combination of SNX-2112 and TRAIL. As expected, our Western blotting results showed that SNX-2112 alone or in combination with TRAIL obviously upregulated DR5 in HeLa cells. Although the expression of DR4 was also significantly increased (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)), the upregulation of DR5 was predominant compared to DR4. As a result, in subsequent experiments, we focused on DR5. Consistent with the changes observed in the protein, immunofluorescence analysis showed that SNX-2112 treatment increased DR5 cell surface expression (Figure 4(c)). Subsequently, we found that the treatment of HeLa cells with SNX-2112 could significantly induce increased protein levels of DR5 in both concentration-dependent and time-dependent manners (Figures 4(d)-4(g)).

To determine the role of DR5 and DR4, we applied a specific siRNA to silence DR5 and DR4 expression. Western blotting revealed that SNX-2112-induced upregulation of DR5 was abolished by DR5 siRNA (Figures 4(h) and 4(i)). Flow cytometry analysis showed that the silencing of DR5 significantly decreased the apoptosis induced by TRAIL/SNX-2112 (Figures 4(j) and 4(k)). However, cleaved-PARP induced by SNX-2112 was not affected by DR5 siRNA (Figure 4(h)). On the other hand, Western blotting also showed that SNX-2112-induced upregulation of DR4 was abolished by DR4 siRNAs (Figures 4(l) and 4(m)). However, flow cytometry analysis showed that the silencing of DR4 did not affect the apoptosis induced by TRAIL/SNX-2112 (Figures 4(n) and 4(o)). These results suggest that DR5 upregulation significantly enhanced apoptosis induced by treatment with a combination of SNX-2112 and TRAIL.

3.5. SNX-2112 Can Significantly Induce Autophagy to Enhance Apoptosis by Inhibiting the Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway in HeLa Cells

By the downregulation of DR4 and DR5 surface expression, the accumulation of autophagosomes in TRAIL-resistant breast cancer cells induces TRAIL resistance [49]. We studied whether autophagy was related to the mechanism that accounted for the upregulation of SNX-2112-induced DR5. The turnover of LC3 protein, a characteristic autophagosomal marker, from the cytosolic form LC3-I to the lipidated form LC3-II is associated with the formation of autophagosomes [50]. Beclin1 is a pivotal protein in autophagy, whose upregulation can lead to autophagy [51].

We determined the expression levels of LC3 and Beclin1 treated with SNX-2112 alone or in combination with TRAIL for 48 h in HeLa cells. First, the combination of TRAIL and SNX-2112 was found to markedly upregulate LC3-II and Beclin1 (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Additionally, the autophagy markers were dramatically upregulated by SNX-2112 alone in other treated groups (Figures 5(c)-5(f)). This indicates that SNX-2112 can markedly induce autophagy in HeLa cells in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, as shown in Figures 5(g) and 5(h), SNX-2112 was found to inhibit the expression of Akt, a client protein of Hsp90. Subsequent testing showed that Akt/mTOR signaling protein, p-Akt, p-mTOR, p-4EBP1, and p-S6 were inhibited by SNX-2112 alone or in combination with TRAIL in HeLa (Figures 5(g)-5(j)). These results suggest that the autophagy effect of SNX-2112 is a result of the inhibition of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in HeLa cells.

Subsequently, an autophagy inhibitor, bafilomycin A1 (BFA), was used to determine the correlation between autophagy and DR5 expression. BFA is an inhibitor of vacuolar ATPase that prevents fusion between lysosomes and autophagosomes [52]. The accumulation of LC3-II induced by SNX-2112 was found to increase in HeLa cells that had been pretreated with BFA at a concentration of 50 nM for 2 h (Figures 5(k) and 5(l)). These results indicate that BFA inhibits the degradation of LC3-II, thus blocking the autophagy. As expected, subsequently, this resulted in the downregulation of SNX-2112-induced DR5 and cleaved PARP (Figures 5(k) and 5(l)). Furthermore, we applied two specific siRNAs to silence Atg7 expression, a protein marker for autophagy. Western blotting demonstrated that SNX-2112-induced upregulation of Atg7, LC-II, DR5, and c-PARP was abolished by Atg7 siRNAs (Figures 5(m) and 5(n)). Flow cytometry analysis showed that the silencing of Atg7 significantly decreased the apoptosis induced by TRAIL/SNX-2112 (Figures 5(o) and 5(p)). These results suggest that autophagy induced by SNX-2112 is dependent on Akt/mTOR signaling and plays an important role in improving the expression of DR5 but also affects SNX-2112-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells.

3.6. SNX-2112 Increases p53 Expression to Enhance TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis

DR5 is a p53-regulated DNA damage-inducible cell death receptor. p53 is an important protein for the regulation of DR4 and DR5 expression at the transcriptional level. Some agents have been found to induce p53-dependent transcription of DR5 to synergize with TRAIL [53, 54].

To investigate whether p53 contributed to SNX-2112-induced DR5 upregulation, we treated HeLa cells with SNX-2112 and examined p53 levels by Western blotting. As shown in Figures 6(a)-6(d), the expression of p53 was increased in a time-dependent and concentration-dependent manner by SNX-2112. Furthermore, we found that SNX-2112-induced p53 was inhibited by PFTα, a p53-specific inhibitor. Moreover, DR5 expression induced by SNX-2112 was abolished in these p53-inhibited HeLa cells (Figures 6(e) and 6(f)), indicating a p53-dependent mechanism. Here, we were particularly interested in the relationship between autophagy and p53. Interestingly, p53 inhibition was correlated with the downregulated expression of LC3-II (Figures 6(e) and 6(f)). Furthermore, the results of the flow cytometry assay showed that PFTα significantly reduced apoptosis induced by TRAIL and SNX-2112 (Figures 6(g) and 6(h)). These results suggest that SNX-2112-induced DR5 is p53-dependent and regulated through the p53-autophagy pathway. Additionally, we found that SNX-2112-induced c-PARP was abolished by PFTα (Figures 6(e) and 6(f)), suggesting that p53 also regulates the apoptosis induced by SNX-2112 alone. In summary, the apoptotic effect induced by the combination of SNX-2112 with TRAIL is involved in the activation of the p53-autophagy-DR5 signaling pathway in HeLa cells.

3.7. JNK Activation Is Involved in TRAIL/SNX-2112-Induced Apoptosis

It has been previously reported that by upregulating the level of ROS, drugs can activate the MAPK signaling pathway to overcome TRAIL resistance, sensitizing TRAIL-induced cancer cells to apoptosis. Here, we investigated whether SNX-2112 could induce MAPK in TRAIL/SNX-2112-induced apoptosis.

Western blotting was used to detect the expression of MAPKs, including extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), JNKs, and p38-MAPKs. The results showed that SNX-2112 markedly increased JNK and p38 phosphorylation, but slightly downregulated ERK phosphorylation, in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). Downregulation of ERK by SNX-2112 may account, at least in part, for the synergistic effect.

HeLa cells were pretreated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125, p38 inhibitor SB203580, and ERK inhibitor PD98059. The results of the flow cytometry assay showed that SP600125 significantly reduced the apoptosis induced by a combination of SNX-2112 with TRAIL (Figures 7(c) and 7(d)). However, SB203580 and PD98059 did not abolish apoptosis induced by TRAIL and SNX-2112 (Figures 7(e)-7(h)). These results suggest that SNX-2112 can induce the activation of JNK to potentiate TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells.

We further analyzed the relationship of JNK between the p53-autophagy-DR5 signaling pathways. As shown in Figures 7(i) and 7(j), JNK inhibitor SP600125 was applied to determine the role of JNK in the p53-autophagy-DR5 pathway. We detected the expression levels of p53, LC3, and DR5 in the presence of SP600125 by Western blotting in HeLa cells. The data showed that the upregulation of SNX-2112-induced DR5 was abolished, as with p53 and LC3-II. Thus, our results suggested that the apoptotic effect induced by the combination of SNX-2112 with TRAIL is induced by the activation of the JNK-p53-autophagy-DR5 signaling pathway in HeLa cells.

3.8. SNX-2112-Induced Accumulation of ROS Activates the JNK-p53-Autophagy Pathway to Mediate DR5 Expression

Many studies have confirmed that DR5 expression was induced by ROS generation [55, 56] and that autophagy-mediated cell death was mediated by ROS [57]. The effect of ROS on the potentiation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by SNX-2112 was also investigated here.

To determine the role of ROS to JNK-p53-autophagy-mediated DR5 signaling, NAC, a reactive oxygen scavenger, was applied. In HeLa cells pretreated with NAC, we found that the upregulation of SNX-2112-induced DR5 was abolished, as with p-JNK, p53, LC3-II, and c-PARP (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)). SNX-2112-induced ROS activated the expression of p-JNK, p53, autophagy protein LC3-II, and death receptor DR5. Overall, it suggested that by increasing the level of ROS, SNX-2112 enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis via the JNK-p53-autophagy-mediated DR5 pathway in HeLa cells.

4. Discussion

TRAIL is a promising anticancer drug, but the resistance of cancer cells to this agent presents a huge obstacle for effective TRAIL-targeted therapy. As a result, agents that can either enhance the effect of TRAIL or overcome its resistance are needed. Many reports have shown that combination therapies produced a higher rate of apoptosis than did monotherapies in many cancers, including renal carcinoma [58] and human colon cancer [59]. In our study, we found that the Hsp90 inhibitor SNX-2112 enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human cervical cancer cells.

The Hsp90 complex mediates the maturation and stability of a variety of client proteins, many of which are crucial in oncogenesis, including Akt and mutant p53 [60]. Inhibition of Hsp90 function disrupts the complex and leads to degradation of client proteins in a proteasome-dependent manner. This results in simultaneous interruption of many signal transduction pathways pivotal to tumor progression and survival. It has been reported that the trial of silencing Hsp90 expression through transfection of Hsp90 siRNAs into HeLa cells could prevent the proliferation, the same as treating with the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG [61]. Also, in lung cancer Calu-1 and H157 cells, inhibiting the Hsp90 expression by special siRNAs could reduce the expression of c-FLIPL [62, 63].

Although SNX-2112 has been previously found to be an anticancer agent against various cancer cells, its effect was generally limited. Our study first provided that the combination of SNX-2112 with TRAIL could enhance cancer cell death by downregulating antiapoptosis proteins, including Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and FLIP, and elucidate the mechanism by which SNX-2112 sensitizes TRAIL to apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. At a mechanistic level, our results showed that SNX-2112 inhibited Akt/mTOR signaling to induce autophagy by the downregulation of Hsp90 client protein Akt (Figure 5) and upregulated the TRAIL-receptor DR5 (Figure 4) through the ROS-activated JNK-p53-autophagy singling pathway (Figures 3-8). We concluded that low concentrations of SNX-2112 allowed TRAIL to activate the death-receptor pathways.

It has been shown that when inhibiting the Hsp90 expression by special siRNAs, the expression of c-FLIPL was reduced in the cells, suggesting that c-FLIPL is a client protein of Hsp90, consistent with the downregulation induced by SNX-2112 (Figure 2(h)). 17-AAG, one of the Hsp90 inhibitors, could downregulate the expression of FLIP and, due to the inhibition of Hsp90, could recruit the CHIP to degrade the FLIP [62, 63].

In clinical studies, the downregulation of death-receptor expression has been one of the crucial causes of cancer cell resistance to TRAIL, and competitive antibodies targeting death-receptors are increasingly gaining attention. Understanding the role of DR5 in synergistic effect and the mechanisms of DR5 upregulation would be very informative. In colorectal cancer cells, tunicamycin was found to effectively enhance TRAIL-induced apoptosis through JNK-CHOP-mediated DR5 upregulation [59], and gefitinib enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis by autophagy- and JNK-mediated death-receptor upregulation [64]. Isoobtusilactone A sensitizes human hepatoma Hep G2 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via ROS and CHOP-mediated DR5 upregulation [56]. Apigenin potentiates TRAIL therapy of non-small cell lung cancer via upregulation of DR4/DR5 expression in a p53-dependent manner [48]. These reports indicated that the drug-induced upregulation of death-receptor DR5 played a key role in the sensitization of TRAIL to cancer cells and demonstrated the great potential of DR5 in the development of antitumor drugs. Our results showed that SNX-2112 upregulated DR5 expression in HeLa cells in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner (Figures 4(d)-4(g)). Silencing of DR5 by DR5 siRNA significantly decreased cell apoptosis induced by SNX-2112 and TRAIL (Figures 4(j)-4(h)). This result was consistent with previous reports and indicated that death-receptor DR5 played a key role in TRAIL/SNX-2112-induced apoptosis. Our study showed for the first time that the upregulation of DR5 induced by SNX-2112 was the result of the activation of the ROS-p53-autophagy pathway. These results provide a novel strategy for oncological treatment, which is the combination of TRAIL with SNX-2112.

Both apoptosis and autophagy are essential cellular pathways related to degradation. They are induced by similar stimuli and regulated by similar pathways. Their crosstalk affects anticancer drug sensitivity and cell death [65]. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. It has been previously reported that autophagy and apoptosis cooperated to affect the fate of cells [66, 67]. Our previous study indicated that SNX-2112 could promote tumor cell death by inducing apoptosis and autophagy in human melanoma A-375 cells [36]. It was this same SNX-2112 that was found to induce autophagy by affecting the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in HeLa cells in this study (Figures 5(a)-5(j)). The autophagy inhibitor BFA was found to effectively inhibit SNX-2112-induced cleavage of PARP, indicating that autophagy synergistically promoted apoptosis in HeLa cells (Figures 5(k) and 5(l)).

It has also been previously reported that TRAIL resistance was regulated by autophagy in some cells. However, the molecular mechanism of autophagy-mediated TRAIL resistance was not yet known [68]. The Guidelines by Klionsky et al. 2016 reported that lysosomal degradation can be prevented by protease inhibitors bafilomycin A1 and chloroquine, which could block the fusion of autophagosomes and increase the level of LC3-II [69]. It was recently found that, in the selected TRAIL-resistant cells (HepG2-TR), the inhibition of autophagy partially restored TRAIL-induced apoptosis and cytotoxicity [70]. However, in a study with colorectal cancer cell lines, the inhibition of autophagy by 3MA was found to significantly decrease DR4 and DR5 upregulation and reduce apoptosis [64]. These results indicated that autophagy might affect TRAIL resistance by regulating the expression of DR5, and our own results are consistent with these findings. We found that autophagy was induced by low concentrations of SNX-2112, and the inhibition of autophagy by BFA or Atg7 siRNAs significantly decreased upregulation of DR5 and the synergistic effect of TRAIL and SNX-2112 (Figure 5). Our findings provide an insight into the mechanism of action between SNX-2112-induced autophagy and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.

The role of autophagy in DR5 regulation has been previously explored in human breast cancer cells. The data showed that high basal levels of autophagosomes sequestered DR4 and DR5 and effected cellular localization of death receptors, thought to contribute to their deficiency on the cell surface [49]. Also, the researchers speculated that bafilomycin A1 hinders the fusion of autophagosomes after apoptotic proteins are enclosed in lysosomes, in which the proteins were degraded. Hence, we considered the possibility that many apoptotic proteins are already trapped in the autophagosomes without being degraded during SNX-2112/TRAIL-induced apoptosis, which could not be stimulated to induce apoptosis. Same as our results, when the HeLa cells incubated with bafilomycin A1, DR5, a cell membrane receptor, was downregulated as shown in Figure 5(k).

From this, we hypothesized that drug-induced autophagy may play a different role than basal autophagy and that its function may be to act as an effective vector for death receptors or to protect and stabilize the structure of the death receptor. Further studies would be needed to determine the precise role of autophagy on death receptors.

As we all know, TRAIL has two receptors DR4 and DR5, and both can induce cell death in cancer cells. It has been reported that the two genes were transcriptional targets of p53 [71]. However, some cancer cells are not equally sensitive to TRAIL through the two receptors [72]. In accordance with these findings, our data showed that SNX-2112 could induce the expression of both DR4 and DR5, but only DR5 affects the apoptosis induced by a combination of TRAIL with SNX-2112 (Figure 4).

TRAIL receptors are differentially regulated. TRAIL differentially binds to TRAIL-R as illustrated by the phosphorothioate-modified CpG nucleotides, which block the binding of TRAIL to DR5 but not to DR4 [73]. TRAIL mutants with selective binding to DR4 or DR5 also showed that binding of TRAIL to DR4 and DR5 involved different amino acids [74].

SNX-2112 has been previously found to significantly decrease the expression of p53 and inhibit the proliferation of esophageal cancer cells [39]. As a target gene of p53, the gene transcription of DR5 is directly regulated by p53. Triptolide increased the level of DR5 in OCI-AML3, whereas increased DR5 was found to decrease in p53-knockdown OCI-AML3 and p53-mutated U937 cells, confirming the role of p53 in regulating DR5 expression [53]. The same phenomena were observed in myeloma cells [72], human hepatocellular carcinoma cells [75], prostate cancer cells [76], and human renal carcinoma cells [54]. Our results confirmed that SNX-2112-induced p53 could upregulate DR5 expression in cervical cancer HeLa cells. Interestingly, our results were the first to find that SNX-2112-induced p53 also conduced to the autophagy, contributing to a synergistic effect between SNX-2112 and TRAIL (Figure 6). This is a novel idea to explain the mechanism of action between p53 and DR5. Above all, our results suggest that the combination of TRAIL and SNX-2112 is more effective in cervical cancer cells with wild-type p53.

The detection of the MAPK signaling pathway proved that SNX-2112 activated TRAIL-induced apoptosis by activating JNK signaling in HeLa cells (Figure 7). The generation of drug-induced ROS has previously been found to activate JNK signaling in cancer cells, subsequently perturb the function of mitochondria, and result in mitochondria-related apoptosis in HeLa and other cancer cells [7781]. Consistently, our results confirmed that SNX-2112-induced ROS upregulated p-JNK, following activation of the p53-autophagy-DR5 pathway.

One of the hallmarks of cancer is the deregulation of cellular energetics, causing a production of higher levels of ROS concomitant with alterations in antioxidant pathways [22]. Suffering from oxidative stress in the long term has made cancer cells acquire the adaptivity allowing them to survive in hypoxia and to become drug-resistant [82], so that, for different treatment strategies aiming at enhancing ROS production in cancer cells, it indicated a grand prospect leading to the selective killing of these cells when compared to normal cells [22]. There is much evidence that drug-induced ROS acting as an upstream signal can induce the upregulation of DR5 [77, 78]. Our results showed that ROS generation contributed to SNX-2112-induced upregulation of JNK-p53-autophagy-mediated DR5 (Figure 8), consistent with the induction of ROS production by other Hsp90 inhibitors [83]. The accumulation of ROS in HeLa cells is a striking feature of SNX-2112-induced apoptosis. Moreover, excessive ROS accumulation might play crucial roles in inducing both cell apoptosis and autophagy [57, 84]. Besides destabilizing Hsp90 client oncoproteins, SNX-2112 exerts cytotoxicity by generating ROS. There may be two explanations for this mechanism. Firstly, it has been reported that some Hsp90 inhibitors could induce mitochondrial ROS production by elevating endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress originating from the accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER [21]. As a consequence of increased ER stress, mitochondrial homeostasis was disrupted and, thereby, the production of mitochondrial ROS was increased [21, 23]. Meanwhile, we have previously proven that SNX-2112 could elevate the role of ER stress to induce apoptosis [41]. Hsp90, a chaperone protein, regulates a variety of cellular processes by assisting in the folding of client proteins. Secondly, the α,β-unsaturated ketone moiety of SNX-2112 may interact with some oxidoreductases, such as thioredoxin reductase, and consequently cause the accumulation of ROS in cells [8587].

In summary, our study is the first to demonstrate that SNX-2112 enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HeLa cells through the ROS-mediated activation of JNK-p53-autophagy-DR5 (Figure 9). Our work contributes to further understanding the antitumor mechanism of SNX-2112. Most importantly, our results detailed the mechanisms of SNX-2112 in combination with TRAIL in cervical cancer cells, providing a reliable theoretical basis for the combination of TRAIL with Hsp90 inhibitor as a novel strategy for the treatment of human cervical cancer.

Abbreviations

TRAIL:Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
Hsp90:Heat shock protein 90
DISC:The death-inducing signal complex
VEGFR2:Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
Z-VAD-fmk:The cell-permeable pan caspase inhibitor
NAC:N-Acetyl-L-cysteine
BFA:Bafilomycin A1.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Liubing Hu and Yan Wang carried out most of the experiments; Liubing Hu, Yan Wang, and Zhong Liu wrote the manuscript; Liubing Hu, Zhong Liu, and Manmei Li analyzed the data and results. Zhong Liu, Yifei Wang, and Manmei Li designed this study and revised the entire manuscript. Manmei Li, Zui Chen, Liangshun Fu, and Sheng Wang participated in some of the experiments and revised the paper. Pengchao Zhang, Xinyue Zhang, Xueping Lu, and Huiyang Jie participated in the study design and some of the experiments. Zui Chen was added as one of the co-authors after acceptance of the manuscript since he performed some of the experiments while revising the manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673670), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2017A030306008, 2017A030313732, and 2015A030313724), Guangdong Special Support Plan for High-level Talents (2016TQ03R849), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (201610010108, 201707010399), and Jinan Double Hundred Talents Plan.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1: the effect of SNX-2112 on the expression level of p62. HeLa cells were treated with SNX-2112 for the indicated (a-b) time (12, 24, and 48 h) or (c-d) concentration (0, 14, 42, and 125 nM). Western blotting was performed to detect the levels of p62. Densitometry analyses of the bands for each protein were performed. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Error bars represent SD from three separate experiments. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. Z. Chen, V. Sangwan, S. Banerjee et al., “Triptolide sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL-induced activation of the death receptor pathway,” Cancer Letters, vol. 348, no. 1-2, pp. 156–166, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Azijli, B. Weyhenmeyer, G. J. Peters, S. de Jong, and F. A. E. Kruyt, “Non-canonical kinase signaling by the death ligand TRAIL in cancer cells: discord in the death receptor family,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 858–868, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Y. Dimberg, C. K. Anderson, R. Camidge, K. Behbakht, A. Thorburn, and H. L. Ford, “On the TRAIL to successful cancer therapy? Predicting and counteracting resistance against TRAIL-based therapeutics,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1341–1350, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. G. Clohessy, J. Zhuang, J. de Boer, G. Gil-Gómez, and H. J. M. Brady, “Mcl-1 interacts with truncated Bid and inhibits its induction of cytochrome c release and its role in receptor-mediated apoptosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 9, pp. 5750–5759, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Chawla-Sarkar, S. I. Bae, F. J. Reu, B. S. Jacobs, D. J. Lindner, and E. C. Borden, “Downregulation of Bcl-2, FLIP or IAPs (XIAP and survivin) by siRNAs sensitizes resistant melanoma cells to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 915–923, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. V. Franco, X. D. Zhang, E. van Berkel et al., “The role of NF-κB in TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis of melanoma cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 166, no. 9, pp. 5337–5345, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Mahalingam, E. Szegezdi, M. Keane, S. . Jong, and A. Samali, “TRAIL receptor signalling and modulation: are we on the right TRAIL?” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 280–288, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. J. Song, J. Y. An, Y. T. Kwon, and Y. J. Lee, “Evidence for two modes of development of acquired tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand resistance. Involvement of Bcl-xL,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 319–328, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. H. A. M. de Wilt, J. Kroon, G. Jansen, S. de Jong, G. J. Peters, and F. A. E. Kruyt, “Bortezomib and TRAIL: a perfect match for apoptotic elimination of tumour cells?” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Lemke, S. von Karstedt, J. Zinngrebe, and H. Walczak, “Getting TRAIL back on track for cancer therapy,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1350–1364, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Neckers and P. Workman, “Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: are we there yet?” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 64–76, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Miyata, H. Nakamoto, and L. Neckers, “The therapeutic target Hsp90 and cancer hallmarks,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 347–365, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. O. M. Grbovic, A. D. Basso, A. Sawai et al., “V600E B-Raf requires the Hsp90 chaperone for stability and is degraded in response to Hsp90 inhibitors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. D. Siegelin, “Inhibition of the mitochondrial Hsp90 chaperone network: a novel, efficient treatment strategy for cancer?” Cancer Letters, vol. 333, no. 2, pp. 133–146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Kamal, L. Thao, J. Sensintaffar et al., “A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6956, pp. 407–410, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. J. van de Vijver, Y. D. He, L. J. van 't Veer et al., “A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 25, pp. 1999–2009, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. J. Van't Veer, H. Dai, M. J. Van De Vijver et al., “Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6871, pp. 530–536, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Modi, A. Stopeck, H. Linden et al., “HSP90 inhibition is effective in breast cancer: a phase II trial of tanespimycin (17-AAG) plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing on trastuzumab,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 5132–5139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Taiyab and C. M. Rao, “HSP90 modulates actin dynamics: inhibition of HSP90 leads to decreased cell motility and impairs invasion,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1813, no. 1, pp. 213–221, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Travers, S. Sharp, and P. Workman, “HSP90 inhibition: two-pronged exploitation of cancer dependencies,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 242–252, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. G. Kim, S. C. Lee, O. H. Kim et al., “HSP90 inhibitor 17-DMAG exerts anticancer effects against gastric cancer cells principally by altering oxidant-antioxidant balance,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 34, pp. 56473–56489, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Postovit, C. Widmann, P. Huang, and S. B. Gibson, “Harnessing oxidative stress as an innovative target for cancer therapy,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 6135739, 2 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Taiyab, A. S. Sreedhar, and C. M. Rao, “Hsp90 inhibitors, GA and 17AAG, lead to ER stress-induced apoptosis in rat histiocytoma,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 142–152, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Jhaveri, T. Taldone, S. Modi, and G. Chiosis, “Advances in the clinical development of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitors in cancers,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1823, no. 3, pp. 742–755, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. M. Gartner, P. Silverman, M. Simon et al., “A phase II study of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 933–937, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Stolfi, F. Pallone, and G. Monteleone, “Molecular targets of TRAIL-sensitizing agents in colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 7886–7901, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. I. A. Vasilevskaya and P. J. O’Dwyer, “17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin overcomes TRAIL resistance in colon cancer cell lines,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 580–589, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. D. Siegelin, A. Habel, and T. Gaiser, “17-AAG sensitized malignant glioma cells to death-receptor mediated apoptosis,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 243–249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. R. Williams, R. Tabios, W. M. Linehan, and L. Neckers, “Intratumor injection of the Hsp90 inhibitor 17AAG decreases tumor growth and induces apoptosis in a prostate cancer xenograft model,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1528–1532, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Pacey, M. Gore, D. Chao et al., “A phase II trial of 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG, tanespimycin) in patients with metastatic melanoma,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 341–349, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. E. H. Day, S. Y. Sharp, M. G. Rowlands et al., “Inhibition of Hsp90 with resorcylic acid macrolactones: synthesis and binding studies,” Chemistry - A European Journal, vol. 16, no. 34, pp. 10366–10372, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. V. Georgakis, Y. Li, G. Z. Rassidakis, H. Martinez-Valdez, L. J. Medeiros, and A. Younes, “Inhibition of heat shock protein 90 function by 17-allylamino-17-demethoxy-geldanamycin in Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells down-regulates Akt kinase, dephosphorylates extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and induces cell cycle arrest and cell death,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 584–590, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Wang, W. Ju, J. Renouard, J. Aden, S. A. Belinsky, and Y. Lin, “17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin synergistically potentiates tumor necrosis factor-induced lung cancer cell death by blocking the nuclear factor-κB pathway,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1089–1095, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S.-X. Wang, H.-Q. Ju, K.-S. Liu et al., “SNX-2112, a novel Hsp90 inhibitor, induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MCF-7 cells,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 75, no. 8, pp. 1540–1545, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Okawa, T. Hideshima, P. Steed et al., “SNX-2112, a selective Hsp90 inhibitor, potently inhibits tumor cell growth, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis in multiple myeloma and other hematologic tumors by abrogating signaling via Akt and ERK,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 846–855, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. S. Liu, H. Liu, J. H. Qi et al., “SNX-2112, an Hsp90 inhibitor, induces apoptosis and autophagy via degradation of Hsp90 client proteins in human melanoma A-375 cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 180–188, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. S. Liu, W. C. Ding, S. X. Wang et al., “The heat shock protein 90 inhibitor SNX-2112 inhibits B16 melanoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo,” Oncology Reports, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1904–1910, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. Wang, F. Shao, Z. Liu et al., “The Hsp90 inhibitor SNX-2112, induces apoptosis in multidrug resistant K562/ADR cells through suppression of Akt/NF-κB and disruption of mitochondria-dependent pathways,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Y. Li, Y. J. Ren, and Y. D. Li, “Effect of SNX-2112 on proliferation of esophageal cancer cells via regulation of excision repair cross-complementing 1, epidermal growth factor receptor, and p53 expression,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 15, no. 2, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. A. Friedman, S. C. Wise, M. Hu et al., “HSP90 inhibitor SNX5422/2112 targets the dysregulated signal and transcription factor network and malignant phenotype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Translational Oncology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 429–IN5, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. X. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Liu et al., “The Hsp90 inhibitor SNX-2112 induces apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells: the role of ER stress,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 446, no. 1, pp. 160–166, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. H. Qin, K. Wang, X. L. Fu et al., “Hsp90 inhibitor induces KG-1a cell differentiation and apoptosis via Akt/NF-κB signaling,” Oncology Reports, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1517–1524, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. T. C. Chou, “Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 440–446, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. C. Chou, “Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 621–681, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Chou and N. Martin, CompuSyn for Drug Combinations: PC Software and User’s Guide: a Computer Program for Quantitation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combinations, and the Determination of IC50 and ED50 and LD50 Values, ComboSyn, Paramus, NJ, USA, 2005.
  46. Q. Liu, X. H. Xiao, L. B. Hu et al., “Anhuienoside C ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis through inhibition of MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, p. 299, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. F. Y. Shao, Z. Y. du, D. L. Ma et al., “B5, a thioredoxin reductase inhibitor, induces apoptosis in human cervical cancer cells by suppressing the thioredoxin system, disrupting mitochondrion-dependent pathways and triggering autophagy,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 30939–30956, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Chen, X. Wang, D. Zha et al., “Apigenin potentiates TRAIL therapy of non-small cell lung cancer via upregulating DR4/DR5 expression in a p53-dependent manner,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 35468, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Di, G. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Takeda, L. A. Rivera Rosado, and B. Zhang, “Accumulation of autophagosomes in breast cancer cells induces TRAIL resistance through downregulation of surface expression of death receptors 4 and 5,” Oncotarget, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1349–1364, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. L. Zhao, S. Liu, J. Xu et al., “A new molecular mechanism underlying the EGCG-mediated autophagic modulation of AFP in HepG2 cells,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 11, article e3160, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Zhu, W. Yu, B. Liu et al., “Escin induces caspase-dependent apoptosis and autophagy through the ROS/p38 MAPK signalling pathway in human osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 10, article e3113, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. J. Hsieh, T. L. Tsai, Y. S. Hsieh, C. J. Wang, and H. L. Chiou, “Dioscin-induced autophagy mitigates cell apoptosis through modulation of PI3K/Akt and ERK and JNK signaling pathways in human lung cancer cell lines,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1927–1937, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. B. Z. Carter, D. H. Mak, W. D. Schober et al., “Triptolide sensitizes AML cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via decrease of XIAP and p53-mediated increase of DR5,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 3742–3750, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K.-j. Min, J.-O. Nam, and T. Kwon, “Fisetin induces apoptosis through p53-mediated up-regulation of DR5 expression in human renal carcinoma Caki cells,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. T. Do, M. K. Na, H. G. Kim et al., “Ilimaquinone induces death receptor expression and sensitizes human colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through activation of ROS-ERK/p38 MAPK-CHOP signaling pathways,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 71, pp. 51–59, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Y. Chen, S. J. Yiin, J. L. Hsu, W. C. Wang, S. C. Lin, and C. L. Chern, “Isoobtusilactone a sensitizes human hepatoma Hep G2 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis via ROS and CHOP-mediated up-regulation of DR5,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 13, pp. 3533–3539, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. L.-U. Ling, K. B. Tan, H. Lin, and G. N. C. Chiu, “The role of reactive oxygen species and autophagy in safingol-induced cell death,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 2, no. 3, article e129, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. K. J. Min, J. H. Jang, J. T. Lee, K. S. Choi, and T. K. Kwon, “Glucocorticoid receptor antagonist sensitizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in renal carcinoma cells through up-regulation of DR5 and down-regulation of c-FLIP(L) and Bcl-2,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. X. Guo, Y. Meng, X. Sheng et al., “Tunicamycin enhances human colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by JNK-CHOP-mediated DR5 upregulation and the inhibition of the EGFR pathway,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. H. Zhang and F. Burrows, “Targeting multiple signal transduction pathways through inhibition of Hsp90,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 488–499, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. Niikura, S. Ohta, K. J. Vandenbeldt, R. Abdulle, B. F. McEwen, and K. Kitagawa, “17-AAG, an Hsp90 inhibitor, causes kinetochore defects: a novel mechanism by which 17-AAG inhibits cell proliferation,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 30, pp. 4133–4146, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Q. Wang, W. Sun, X. Hao, T. Li, L. Su, and X. Liu, “Down-regulation of cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (Long Form) contributes to apoptosis induced by Hsp90 inhibition in human lung cancer cells,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 54, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Panner, J. C. Murray, M. S. Berger, and R. O. Pieper, “Heat shock protein 90alpha recruits FLIPS to the death-inducing signaling complex and contributes to TRAIL resistance in human glioma,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 19, pp. 9482–9489, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Chen, Y. Meng, X. Guo et al., “Gefitinib enhances human colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis of via autophagy- and JNK-mediated death receptors upregulation,” Apoptosis, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1291–1301, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. Yang, L. Liu, M. Xie et al., “Poly-ADP-ribosylation of HMGB1 regulates TNFSF10/TRAIL resistance through autophagy,” Autophagy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 214–224, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. S. Mukhopadhyay, P. K. Panda, N. Sinha, D. N. Das, and S. K. Bhutia, “Autophagy and apoptosis: where do they meet?” Apoptosis, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 555–566, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Liu, B. Yang, L. Zhang et al., “Ginkgolic acid induces interplay between apoptosis and autophagy regulated by ROS generation in colon cancer,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 498, no. 1, pp. 246–253, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. B. Z. Yuan, J. Chapman, M. Ding et al., “TRAIL and proteasome inhibitors combination induces a robust apoptosis in human malignant pleural mesothelioma cells through Mcl-1 and Akt protein cleavages,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 140, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. J. Klionsky, K. Abdelmohsen, A. Abe et al., “Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition),” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–222, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. C. Lim, H. J. Jeon, K. H. Kee, M. J. Lee, R. Hong, and S. I. Han, “Involvement of DR4/JNK pathway-mediated autophagy in acquired TRAIL resistance in HepG2 cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1983–1990, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. X. Liu, P. Yue, F. R. Khuri, and S. Y. Sun, “p53 upregulates death receptor 4 expression through an intronic p53 binding site,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 5078–5083, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. Surget, D. Chiron, P. Gomez-Bougie et al., “Cell death via DR5, but not DR4, is regulated by p53 in myeloma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 17, pp. 4562–4573, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. D. Chiron, C. Pellat-Deceunynck, M. Maillasson, R. Bataille, and G. Jego, “Phosphorothioate-modified TLR9 ligands protect cancer cells against TRAIL-induced apoptosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 4371–4377, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. A. M. van der Sloot, V. Tur, E. Szegezdi et al., “Designed tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand variants initiating apoptosis exclusively via the DR5 receptor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 23, pp. 8634–8639, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. Wang, R. Qi, N. Li et al., “Notch1 signaling sensitizes tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting Akt/Hdm2-mediated p53 degradation and up-regulating p53-dependent DR5 expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 24, pp. 16183–16190, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. H. Xiaowen and S. Yi, “Triptolide sensitizes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells via p53-mediated DR5 up-regulation,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 8763–8770, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. R. Trivedi, R. Maurya, and D. P. Mishra, “Medicarpin, a legume phytoalexin sensitizes myeloid leukemia cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis through the induction of DR5 and activation of the ROS-JNK-CHOP pathway,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 5, no. 10, article e1465, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. C. C. Chang, C. P. Kuan, J. Y. Lin, J. S. Lai, and T. F. Ho, “Tanshinone IIA facilitates TRAIL sensitization by up-regulating DR5 through the ROS-JNK-CHOP signaling axis in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1574–1583, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. Sophonnithiprasert, W. Mahabusarakam, Y. Nakamura, and R. Watanapokasin, “Goniothalamin induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced activation of JNK in HeLa cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 119–128, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. C. C. Su, K. I. Lee, M. K. Chen, C. Y. Kuo, C. H. Tang, and S. H. Liu, “Cantharidin induced oral squamous cell carcinoma cell apoptosis via the JNK-regulated mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum stress-related signaling pathways,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 12, article e0168095, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. K. I. Lee, C. C. Su, C. Y. Yang et al., “Etoposide induces pancreatic β-cells cytotoxicity via the JNK/ERK/GSK-3 signaling-mediated mitochondria-dependent apoptosis pathway,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 36, pp. 142–152, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. H. Xie and M. C. Simon, “Oxygen availability and metabolic reprogramming in cancer,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 41, pp. 16825–16832, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. H. Chen, K. C. Chiang, C. T. Cheng et al., “Antitumor activity of the combination of an HSP90 inhibitor and a PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor against cholangiocarcinoma,” Oncotarget, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 2372–2389, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. C. Zhang, L. Yang, X. B. Wang et al., “Calyxin Y induces hydrogen peroxide-dependent autophagy and apoptosis via JNK activation in human non-small cell lung cancer NCI-H460 cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 340, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Carlson, L. Marler, S. J. Nam, B. Santarsiero, J. Pezzuto, and B. Murphy, “Potential chemopreventive activity of a new macrolide antibiotic from a marine-derived Micromonospora sp,” Marine Drugs, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1152–1161, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. D. Duan, J. Zhang, J. Yao, Y. Liu, and J. Fang, “Targeting thioredoxin reductase by parthenolide contributes to inducing apoptosis of HeLa cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 19, pp. 10021–10031, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. E. Davioud-Charvet, M. J. McLeish, D. M. Veine et al., “Mechanism-based inactivation of thioredoxin reductase from Plasmodium falciparum by Mannich bases. Implication for cytotoxicity,” Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 45, pp. 13319–13330, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Liubing Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1082
Downloads623
Citations

Related articles