Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3426925 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3426925

Zepeng Zhang, Lu Zhai, Jing Lu, Sanmiao Sun, Dandan Wang, Daqing Zhao, Liwei Sun, Weimin Zhao, Xiangyan Li, Ying Chen, "Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo Formula Attenuates Macrophage Inflammation and Lipid Accumulation through the Activation of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 3426925, 19 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3426925

Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo Formula Attenuates Macrophage Inflammation and Lipid Accumulation through the Activation of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway

Academic Editor: Alin Ciobica
Received16 Apr 2020
Revised29 Jul 2020
Accepted04 Aug 2020
Published05 Oct 2020

Abstract

Atherosclerosis (AS) is the killer of human health and longevity, which is majorly caused by oxidized lipoproteins that attack macrophages in the endarterium. The Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo (SHTL) formula has shown great clinical efficacy and vascular protective effect for over 30 years in China, to attenuate AS progression. However, its pharmacological mechanism needs more investigation. In this study, we first investigated the chemical composition of SHTL by fingerprint analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography. In primary mouse peritoneal macrophages induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), we found that SHTL pretreatment suppressed reactive oxygen species accumulation and reversed the increases of the inflammatory factors, TNF-α and IL-6. Moreover, lipid accumulation induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) in macrophages was inhibited by SHTL. Additionally, network pharmacology was used to predict the potential targets of SHTL as the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 signaling pathway, which was validated in macrophages and ApoE-/- mice by histopathological staining, qPCR, and Western blot analysis. Importantly, the protective effect of SHTL in the LPS- and Ox-LDL-induced macrophages against inflammation and lipid accumulation was attenuated by GW9662, a PPAR-γ antagonist, which confirmed the prediction results of network pharmacology. In summary, these results indicated that SHTL pretreatment reduced inflammation and lipid accumulation of macrophages by activating the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway, which may provide a new insight into the mechanism of SHTL in the suppression of AS progression.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerosis (AS) is a disease with narrowing of the arteries due to plaque accumulation, resulting in cardiac disorders, stroke, and vascular diseases with a high mortality rate worldwide [1]. Most studies have shown the importance of oxidized lipoprotein accumulation and inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of AS. Thus, the interventions targeting these pathogenic processes might be effective therapeutic strategies for AS treatment [2, 3]. Macrophages are the driving force in all stages of atherosclerosis [4], which can internalize oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) to maintain the lipid balance in the blood vessels. However, macrophages usually lose their compensatory capacity and elicit local inflammation, causing themselves to become foam cells, which are the main pathogenic factors in AS [5, 6]. Collectively, the maintenance for macrophage homeostasis is the potential strategy to slow down the progression of AS [7].

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are important regulators in many pathological processes, including plasma lipoprotein balance, foam cell formation, inflammatory response, and plaque stability [8]. Potential crosstalk has been identified between PPAR and liver X receptors (LXRs) for the prevention and treatment of AS [9]. PPAR-γ can induce cholesterol efflux from macrophages via the induction of LXRs [10, 11]. The LXRs can regulate cholesterol removal by the induction of plasma membrane transporters, such as ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1 (ABCA1) and subfamily G member 1 (ABCG1) [12]. Meanwhile, recent studies have revealed that the activation of PPAR-γ can reduce the expression of inflammatory factors in the aortic root, thus inhibiting the development of AS [13]. Therefore, the PPAR-γ/LXR-α pathway could be a potential therapeutic target in regulating the progression of AS [14].

For centuries, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has played an irreplaceable role in Chinese healthcare [15]. In Chinese medicine, the disease characteristics of AS have already been recorded and called Xiong Bi with common symptoms, like Qi deficiency, phlegm stagnation, and blood stagnation, which are used to guide TCM doctors for AS diagnosis and treatment [1618]. According to the principles of TCM above, the Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo (SHTL) formula was developed and used to treat the patients with AS by tonifying Qi and invigorating blood circulation for over thirty years in the Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine by decreasing the incidence of secondary terminal events and total angina pectoris score [19, 20]. SHTL contains eight herbs, including Panax ginseng C.A. Mey, Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, Rhodiola crenulata (Hook.f. & Thomson) H. Ohba, Lonicera japonica Thunb, Paeonia anomala subsp. veitchii (Lynch) D.Y.Hong & K.Y.Pan, Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim, Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels, and Dalbergia odorifera T.C.Chen. However, the molecular mechanism of SHTL against AS progression remains unclear. Here, we first elucidated the protective effects of SHTL against inflammation and lipid accumulation in the LPS- or Ox-LDL-induced macrophages. Next, the potential target of SHTL, the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 signaling pathway, was predicted by network pharmacology and validated by a series of experiments using a PPAR-γ antagonist. This study may provide a new insight on the therapeutic effects and molecular mechanism of SHTL against AS progression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Ox-LDL and DiI-Ox-LDL were purchased from Yiyuan Biotechnology (Guangzhou, China). Antibodies against PPAR-γ (57 kDa, ab59256), LXR-α (50 kDa, ab41902), and ABCA1 (254 kDa, ab18180) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). β-Actin (42 kDa, #3700) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). GW9662 was obtained from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA).

2.2. Preparation of SHTL

The 8 herbs present in SHTL were purchased from the Department of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine (Jilin, China). The composition of SHTL at a weight ratio of 4 : 5 : 3 : 3 : 3 : 4 : 4 : 2 is presented in Table 1 and was deposited to the Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine. According to the standard procedure from Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2015 edition), 280 g of herb mixture was extracted in 300 mL of distilled water at 100°C for 30 min. The procedure was repeated two times to obtain the aqueous extract. The aqueous extract was filtered and centrifuged; and the supernatant was dried under vacuum to produce a powder with a yield of 15.71% [21].


Chinese nameLatin nameFamilyWeight (g)Part usedVoucher specimen

Ren shenPanax ginseng C.A. MeyAraliaceae20Root180516-1
Dan shenSalvia miltiorrhiza BungeLamiaceae25Root180913-1
Hong jingtianRhodiola crenulataCrassulaceae15Root180913-2
Jin yinhuaLonicera japonica ThunbCaprifoliaceae15Flower180913-3
Chi shaoPaeonia anomala subsp. veitchii (Lynch) D.Y.Hong & K.Y.PanRanunculaceae15Root180913-4
Gua louTrichosanthes kirilowii MaximCucurbitaceae20Fruit180913-5
Dang guiAngelica sinensis (Oliv.) DielsApiaceae20Root180913-6
Jiang xiangDalbergia odorifera T.C.ChenLeguminosae10Rhizome180913-7

2.3. Quality Control Analysis

Based on previous reports, 10 different batches of SHTL powders were separated using a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (, 5 μm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analyzed for chemical fingerprints using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu Corp., Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a diode array detector (DAD) (Shimadzu Corp.) [21]. Acetonitrile in water (solvent A) and 0.4% phosphoric acid in water (solvent B) constituted the mobile phase (Supplementary Table 1). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min at 25°C, and the detection wavelength was set at 203 nm. Salidroside, chlorogenic acid, paeoniflorin, ferulic acid, luteoloside, ginsenoside Rg1, and luteolin were used as controls to analyze the retention time (Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; Shanghai, China).

2.4. Animal Study

All animal protocols adopted in the present study were approved by the Experimental Animal Administration Committee of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine (Approval No. 20190048), which follows the guidelines established by the US National Institutes of Health. After adaptive feeding for 1 week, ApoE-/- mice from Beijing Huafukang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., were fed with high-fat diet (HFD, 40 kcal% fat, 1.25% cholesterol, 0.5% cholic acid, D12109, Research Diets, Inc., NJ, USA) for 6 weeks, then orally administrated with SHTL, and received HFD for 8 weeks. All animals are kept in a specific pathogen-free environment.

2.5. Analysis of the Atherosclerotic Plaque Area

The heart and aorta were extracted, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded to make tissue blocks, which were cut into 6 μM sections. Tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and covered with 3% H2O2 for 10 min. After blocking with BSA, slides were incubated with primary antibodies, PPAR-γ, LXR-α, and ABCA1 for 1 h at 37°C and with corresponding secondary antibodies for an additional 1 h. Antigenic sites were visualized by the addition of DAB and counterstained with hematoxylin. En face aorta Oil red O staining was performed to evaluate lipid and plaque accumulation in the aorta following the protocol published before [22]. Cryocut cross-sections were washed twice with ultrapure water and stained with 0.3% Oil red O (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in 60% isopropanol for 10 min, washed with 75% isopropanol for 1 min, and then counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 min. After washing with ultrapure water for 3 min, cross-sections were covered with glycerogelatin. The positively stained areas were determined using Image-Pro Plus 5.0 software.

2.6. Cell Culture and Model Establishment

Briefly, 8-week-old mice received intraperitoneal injections of 4% Brewer thioglycollate medium (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) to produce peritoneal macrophages. After 3 days, the peritoneal cells were isolated in ice-cold PBS, centrifuged, and washed with lysis buffer to remove red blood cells (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Next, cells were seeded in culture dishes for 2 h followed by washing with PBS to remove floating cells. After 24 h incubation, adherent cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, New York, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Clark Bioscience, Claymont, DE, USA), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Biosharp, Hefei, China) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 [23]. THP-1 human monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 150 nM) for 24 h to differentiate into adherent macrophages [24]. Peritoneal macrophages and differentiated THP-1 cells were incubated with LPS (100 ng/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 8 h or Ox-LDL (40 μg/mL) for 24 h to establish cell models of inflammation or lipid accumulation for further experimentation.

2.7. Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well cell culture plates and treated with SHTL for 48 h. After adding MTT (0.5 mg/mL), the formazan crystals were dissolved with 150 μL of DMSO, and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Infinite M200 PRO, Tecan, ZH, Switzerland) [25].

2.8. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Measurement

Cells were treated with various concentrations of SHTL for 24 h, prior to incubation with 100 ng/mL LPS for 8 h. Next, they were equilibrated in carboxy-H2DCFDA (10 μM, Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) in culture medium for another 20 min at 37°C. Fluorescence intensity was analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) [26].

2.9. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

After incubation with SHTL, LPS, and GW9662, the supernatants of macrophages from each group were collected. The levels of the proinflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-6 in the supernatants were detected using the mouse TNF-α (88-7324-22) and IL-6 (88-7064-22) ELISA kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [27].

2.10. DiI-Ox-LDL Uptake Assay

To assess lipid accumulation in macrophages, different groups of cells were serum-starved for 8 h, followed by exposure to 50 μg/mL of DiI-Ox-LDL for 4 h. Then, the samples were washed with PBS and analyzed using a flow cytometry (BD Biosciences); the images were collected and analyzed using a high-content analysis system (Perkin Elmer, Massachusetts, USA).

2.11. Cholesterol Efflux Fluorometric Assay

To assess cholesterol efflux in macrophages, this assay was conducted as previously described [28]. Briefly, after SHTL pretreatment for 24 h, macrophages were incubated with fluorescently labeled cholesterol for 4 h in a humidified cell culture incubator and then incubated in a medium containing different interventions for another 4 h. At the end of incubation, we transferred the supernatants of each well (including control wells) to a white 96-well plate (with opaque, flat-bottom wells) and measured the fluorescence () in the endpoint mode. The adherent cells were solubilized by cell lysis buffer to measure the fluorescence (Ex/Em = 482/515 nm): cholesterol efflux% = fluorescence intensity of the media/fluorescence intensity of the cell lysate + media100.

2.12. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA from the macrophages treated under different conditions was extracted to determine the relative mRNA levels of PPAR-γ, LXR-α, ABCA1, IL-6, and TNF-α using the total RNA kit (Omega, Norcross, GA, USA). 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, USA). The assay was performed in a Bio-Rad CFX96 system, and the gene expression was normalized to β-actin and calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [29]. The primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 2.

2.13. Western Blotting Analysis

Western blot analysis was conducted using a previously described method [30]. Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer, and protein concentration was quantified using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). Equal amounts of protein (40 μg) were separated using 8% or 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies (PPAR-γ, LXR-α, and ABCA1) overnight at 4°C after blocking with 5% nonfat milk, followed by incubation with appropriate secondary antibodies. The protein bands were visualized and analyzed using a chemiluminescent imaging system (FluorChem, ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.14. Target Prediction of SHTL

Network pharmacology was conducted to identify the potential targets of the eight herbs in SHTL. The SHTL formula was input by the herb list (pinyin name) to the BATMAN-TCM database. The required parameters settings were , and the enrichment analyses of a group of protein targets are all based on the hypergeometric cumulative distribution test (for KEGG enrichment pathway analysis, we exclude those targets located in ≥10% KEGG pathways), and the multiple testing correction of the value was based on the Benjamini-Hochberg correction method [31]. Data visualization of the herb components and the potential pathways for SHTL were obtained using Gephi 0.9.2 software and OmicShare Tools, respectively [32, 33]. Then, we screened the relevant compounds from SHTL with the following screening parameters: , , , and to dig out the core targets in the potential pathways. In the STRING database, the basic and analytic settings, including the meaning of network edges, text mining, experiments, and databases, were selected to analyze the potential target proteins from the above candidates [34]. Finally, the core potential targets of SHTL were validated using the prediction of disease targets by BATMAN-TCM database.

2.15. Statistical Analysis

Data from three independent experiments were expressed as the and were studied using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). For multiple comparisons, data were subjected to one-way ANOVA (Turkey’s post hoc) to determine statistical significance. For all the statistical tests, was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Quality Control Analysis of SHTL

To investigate the main components and the similarity between different batches of the SHTL formula, we investigated the chromatographic fingerprints of SHTL and standard compounds. As shown in Figures 1(a) and 1(b), twenty-five peaks of the SHTL extract were identified through the HPLC fingerprints. Seven peaks were identified by comparing the retention times with the standards. These included salidroside in Rhodiola, chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, luteolin in honeysuckle, paeoniflorin in Paeoniae radix rubra, ferulic acid in Angelica, and ginsenoside Rg1 in Panax ginseng C.A. Mey in SHTL (Figure 1(b)). Moreover, all the 10 batches of SHTL were found to be 98.4% to 99.9% similar, indicating that the SHTL formula was reproducible with good quality control (Figure 1(c)).

3.2. SHTL Inhibits Inflammation Response in LPS-Induced Macrophages

To observe dose-dependent cytotoxic effects of SHTL in mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs), cell viability was measured. As shown in Figure 2(a), SHTL had no cytotoxic effect at concentrations below 500 μg/mL on macrophages after 24 h of pretreatment. To further examine the anti-inflammatory effect of SHTL, MPMs were treated with different doses of SHTL for 24 h and incubated with LPS for 8 h. In the LPS-induced cell model, LPS incubation significantly increased the level of intracellular ROS, which was reduced by SHTL pretreatment (Figure 2(b)). Meanwhile, LPS increased the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the supernatants of MPMs to 400.71 pg/mL and 167.38 pg/mL, respectively. SHTL pretreatment for 24 h significantly attenuated the increase in expression of TNF-α and IL-6 that was induced by LPS (Figure 2(c)). These results indicated that SHTL pretreatment inhibited the inflammatory response induced by LPS in macrophages.

3.3. SHTL Reduces Lipid Accumulation in the Ox-LDL-Induced Macrophages

Further, we performed Oil red O or DiI-Ox-LDL staining to evaluate the protective effect of SHTL against Ox-LDL-induced lipid accumulation in mouse peritoneal and THP-1-differentiated macrophages. As shown in Figure 3(a) (top), Oil red O staining showed that pretreatment with SHTL for 24 h lowered the Ox-LDL-induced cellular accumulation of lipid droplets in MPMs. Moreover, fluorescence microscopic analysis revealed that Ox-LDL stimulation increased DiI-Ox-LDL internalization, which was inhibited by SHTL pretreatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3(a), bottom). Additionally, flow cytometric analysis showed that pretreatment with SHTL inhibited the uptake of DiI-Ox-LDL in THP-1-drived macrophages (Figure 3(b)). These results indicated that SHTL obviously reduced lipid accumulation in Ox-LDL-induced macrophages.

3.4. The Target Prediction of SHTL by Network Pharmacology

The molecular mechanism of SHTL involved in the reduction of inflammation and lipid accumulation was explored using BATMAN-TCM, to find the potential targets of the candidate compounds from SHTL. Based on the screening conditions, 447 candidate active compounds were identified in SHTL (Figure 4(a)) and are listed in Table 2. After GO enrichment pathway analysis, we found that the target pathways significantly involved in the mechanism of SHTL included the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction; calcium signaling pathway; glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism; TGF-β signaling pathway; and PPAR signaling pathway (Supplementary Table 3). The top 20 enrichment pathways of SHTL are shown in Figure 4(b) and are also listed in Supplementary Table 3. Furthermore, the STRING database was used for digging out the core targets of active compounds in SHTL. As shown in Figure 4(c), 112 nodes and 841 edges were found and built the interactions of active compounds of SHTL and their targets, with an average local clustering coefficient 0.552 and the PPI enrichment value < 1.0-16. Among these nodes, the PPAR-γ pathway was the most interactive and participated in the negative regulation of lipid storage and inflammatory response and lipid homeostasis (Figure 4(c) and Supplementary Table 4). Meanwhile, SHTL showed a strong regulation and control function of PPAR-γ on NR1H3 (LXR-α), ABCA1, TNF-α, and IL-6, which were involved in the regulation of inflammatory response and lipid accumulation. Finally, the disease target network verified the central role of PPAR-γ in regulating AS, inflammation, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and other diseases (Supplementary Figure S1). These results suggested that the PPAR-γ pathway may be the core potential target of SHTL for inhibiting the inflammatory response and lipid accumulation.


HerbsNumberComponents

Panax ginseng C.A. Mey155Ginsenoyne B, ginsenoyne E, argininyl-fructosyl-glucose uridine alpha-cadinol, octanal, beta-elemene, chrysanthemaxanthin, biotin, chikusetsusaponin IV, pandamine, panasinsanol A, N-pentadecane, ginsenoside F1, aposiopolamine, D-mannuronic acid, palmitic acid, etc.
Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge75Miltionone II, miltipolone, danshenol B, tanshiquinone B, miltirone, isocucurbitacin D, baicalin, tigogenin neotigogenin, isotanshinone I, monomethyl lithospermate, salonitenolide, magnesium lithospermate B, miltionone I, etc.
Rhodiola crenulata1Salidroside
Lonicera japonica Thunb72Menthyl acetate, inositol, 2-furaldehyde, linalyl oxide, carvacrol, methyl palmitate, methyl linoleate, chrysoeriol, eugenol methyl ether, farnesyl acetate, loganoside, benzyl cyanide, lonicerin, 2-heptadecanone, loganin, macrocarpal A, stigmasterol, geranyl acetate, citronellyl acetate, etc.
Paeonia anomala subsp. veitchii31Trichothecin, menthyl acetate, tetradecane, karounidiol 3-benzoate, methyl palmitate, myristicin, N-nonanol, palmitone, gamma-aminobutyric acid, cucurbitacin B, naphthalene, 5, 25-stigmastadien-3beta-Ol-beta-D-glucoside, karounidiol, caproic acid, stigmastanol, stearin, 20-hexadecanoylingenol, bryonolic acid, etc.
Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim19Oxypaeoniflorin, lactiflorin, paeonin, benzoylpaeoniflorin, albiflorin, paeonolide, galloylpaeoniflorin, (+)-catechin, gallocatechin, paeoniflorin, (-)-catechin, beta-sitosterol, acetic acid, paeonoside, paeonol, paeoniflorigenone, catechin, epigallocatechin, daucosterol, etc.
Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels120Dimethyl phthalate, suchilactone, beta-myrcene, ethanol, tetradecane, carvacrol, 2,4,5-trimethylbenzaldehyde, 2,4-dimethylbenzaldehyde, 2,4-dihydroxyacetophenone, uridine, 2-propene, 3-O-tetradecanoyl-1-cyano-2-methyl-1, beta-elemene, chrysanthemaxanthin, palmitic acid, azelaic acid, dimethyl-beta-propiothetin, 4-ethylresorcinol, vanillin, dimethyl sebacate, etc.
Dalbergia odorifera T.C.Chen4Nordalbergin, isodalbergin, dalbergin, luteolin

3.5. SHTL Activates the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway in the Ox-LDL-Induced Macrophages

Based on the results of enrichment analysis of network pharmacology, we further validated whether the protective effect of SHTL against inflammation and lipid accumulation was dependent on the PPAR-γ signaling pathway. The PPAR-γ/LXR-α signaling pathway is a negative regulator of inflammation and lipid metabolism, which also regulates ABCA1 expression for lipid homeostasis [35, 36]. qPCR and Western blot analyses detected the expression profiles of PPAR-γ, LXR-α, and ABCA1 in macrophages. We first found that SHTL pretreatment increased the mRNA levels of LXR-α and ABCA1 in untreated macrophages (Supplementary Figure S2A). In the Ox-LDL-induced macrophages, qPCR analysis showed that Ox-LDL inhibited the levels of LXR-α and ABCA1 in a time-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure S2B). Importantly, SHTL pretreatment for 24 h significantly increased the mRNA levels of PPAR-γ, LXR-α, and ABCA1 in a dose-dependent manner in the Ox-LDL-induced macrophages (Figure 5(a)). Moreover, SHTL pretreatment upregulated the protein levels of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABAC1 pathway, compared with the Ox-LDL induction (Figures 5(b)5(d)). In addition, we found that SHTL also could upregulate the protein level of PPAR-γ after LPS incubation in macrophages (Figure 5(e)). Therefore, these findings suggested that SHTL activated the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABAC1 pathway in Ox-LDL- and LPS-induced macrophages.

3.6. SHTL Decreased the Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Regulates the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABAC1 Pathway in ApoE-/- Mice

To further examine the antiatherosclerotic effect of SHTL, we collected the aortic tissues in ApoE-/- mice after 6 weeks of high-fat diet and 8 weeks of SHTL intervention. Both en face aorta and cross-section Oil red O stainings showed that SHTL reduced the lesion area and atherosclerotic plaque area for about 30% (Figures 6(a)6(c)). Meanwhile, immunohistochemical staining in Figure 6(d) showed that SHTL upregulated the protein expressions of PPAR-γ, LXR-α, and ABAC1 in plaque. The fatty degeneration and plaque volume of the SHTL group were significantly smaller than the HFD group (Figure 6(d)). These results proved that SHTL decreased the progression of atherosclerotic plaque by upregulating the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABAC1 pathway in ApoE-/- mice.

3.7. SHTL Inhibits LPS-Induced Inflammatory Response in a PPAR-γ-Dependent Manner in Macrophages

The above findings have shown that SHTL pretreatment upregulates the PPAR-γ pathway to decrease lipid accumulation in macrophages. To further validate the molecular mechanism of SHTL, GW9662, a specific PPAR antagonist, was used in this study. Given the observed inhibitory effect of SHTL on inflammation, we examined whether the anti-inflammatory role of SHTL was mediated by the activation of the PPAR-γ pathway. As shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b), flow cytometric (FCM) analysis showed that SHTL reduced the ROS in LPS-induced mouse peritoneal macrophages, but the combination of SHTL and GW9662 has no obvious effect on the decrease of ROS levels by SHTL. Moreover, we found that the combination of SHTL and GW9662 reversed the inhibitory effects of SHTL on the levels of mRNA and protein levels of TNF-α induced by LPS stimulation (Figure 7(c)). Additionally, a similar trend was observed in the mRNA and protein levels of IL-6 in the LPS-induced macrophages, after combined treatment of SHTL with GW9662 (Figure 7(d)). These data suggested that SHTL inhibited LPS-induced inflammation in macrophages by the activation of the PPAR-γ signaling pathway.

3.8. SHTL Attenuates LPS- and Ox-LDL-Induced Lipid Accumulation through the Activation of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway in Macrophages

Inflammatory- and lipid-accumulated macrophages play an important role in plaque formation in AS [37, 38]. Combined with the above results, the antiatherosclerosis effect of SHTL by the upregulation of the PPAR-γ pathway was further confirmed in a combined macrophage model. M1 proinflammatory macrophages were induced by LPS incubation followed by treatment with Ox-LDL or DiI-Ox-LDL to establish a lipid accumulation model. First, we found that LPS stimulation enhanced DiI-Ox-LDL accumulation in macrophages (Supplementary Figure S3). Consistent with the findings in Figure 3(b), SHTL decreased DiI-Ox-LDL accumulation in LPS-induced inflammatory macrophages, which was attenuated by GW9662 (Figures 8(a)8(c)). The percentage of cholesterol efflux in DiI-Ox-LDL- and LPS-induced macrophages showed a similar trend in Figure 8(d). Moreover, the mRNA levels of LXR-α and ABCA1 were significantly decreased by incubation with LPS and Ox-LDL, which were increased by pretreatment with SHTL for 24 h. The combination of SHTL with GW9662 inhibited the increases in LXR-α and ABCA1 levels after SHTL treatment in the inflammatory and lipid overloading macrophages (Figure 8(e)). Also, Western blot analysis revealed a similar expression pattern of these key molecules, LXR-α and ABCA1 (Figures 8(f) and 8(g)). These results suggested that SHTL attenuated LPS- and Ox-LDL-induced lipid accumulation by the activation of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway in macrophages.

4. Discussion

Inflammatory response and lipid accumulation are regarded as the major pathogenesis of macrophage disorders in AS [39]. Therefore, the inhibition of inflammatory response and lipid accumulation in macrophages could slow down the process of AS [40, 41]. Here, we used network pharmacology to predict the potential targets of SHTL for protecting the macrophages. This study provides experimental evidence for the inhibitory effect of SHTL against inflammation response and lipid accumulation by activating the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 signaling pathway in macrophages and ApoE-/- mice, which may be the potential mechanism of SHTL treatment for AS patients.

In AS, macrophages ensure tissue cholesterol homeostasis by removing Ox-LDL from the intercellular space [42]. LDL retained in the intima by binding to proteoglycan and was oxidatively modified to form lipid hydroperoxides, lysophospholipids, and other active moieties, which can induce the expression of adhesion molecules, chemokines, and proinflammatory cytokines in macrophages. Meanwhile, foamy macrophages are unable to induce an inflammatory response as strong as nonfoamy cells [43]. Importantly, TNF-α, IL-2, IFN-γ, and other proinflammatory cytokines downregulate cholesterol efflux and promote lipid accumulation in the lesion, which may accelerate macrophage transformation to foam cells and decrease cholesterol clearance [44]. Therefore, inflammation and lipid homeostasis are interacting in a dynamic equilibrium in macrophages during AS.

Most studies of TCM only focus on only one of them, like quercetin and rographolide, which have shown the functions of decreasing the level of ROS and the release of inflammatory cytokines by LPS in macrophages [45, 46]. In our study, we found that the pretreatment of SHTL showed similar efficacy of inflammatory inhibition to the above TCM. We also suggested that the pretreatment with SHTL could inhibit lipid accumulation in macrophages. Interestingly, SHTL pretreatment significantly inhibited the inflammation-induced foam formation. These results confirmed the therapeutic ability of SHTL in the multiple processes of AS.

Generally, it is difficult for us to explain the mechanisms involved in the TCM formulas because of the complicated compositions from multiple natural product-based prescriptions [47]. Network pharmacology can analyze multicomponent and multitarget agents to reveal the potential therapeutic mechanisms of TCM formulas [48]. In the present study, we combined the BATMAN-TCM, TCMSP, and STRING databases to find out the potential targets of SHTL [49]. We found that the PPAR pathway was the potential pathway of SHTL through enrichment analysis and identified its core targets using the STRING database analysis. Disease target network analysis showed that the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway, the most valuable targets of SHTL, participated in inflammatory responses and cellular lipid homeostasis during AS, which was in line with our findings from LPS- and/or Ox-LDL-induced macrophage models. Furthermore, in HFD-induced ApoE-/- mice, SHTL could reduce atherosclerotic plaque by upregulating the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway. Finally, we used the selective PPAR-γ antagonist GW9662 to further verify the predicted pathway of SHTL by network pharmacology. Therefore, our study used several easy-to-operate databases and rescue experiments by a specific inhibitor to explore the targets of SHTL, the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway, against inflammation and lipid accumulation [50].

As the common feature of TCM, SHTL contains multiple ingredients and has multiple intracellular targets. Although several major components of SHTL were identified by HPLC, the direct relationship between active ingredients of SHTL and their targets against AS needs to be further investigated. In the present study, the PPAR-γ signaling pathway was identified by network pharmacology and experimental outcome; other potential pathways of SHTL should be further detected. In addition, the protective role of SHTL for the treatment of AS needs to be evaluated in animal and clinical studies.

5. Conclusion

This study describes the protective effect of SHTL against inflammation and lipid accumulation in macrophages. The PPAR-γ pathway was predicted as the potential target of SHTL by network pharmacology and validated by a PPAR-γ antagonist, GW9662. These findings indicated that SHTL could protect macrophages by activating the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 pathway; our experiments in ApoE-/- mice further support its antiatherosclerotic effect, which may provide a new insight into the mechanism of SHTL in the suppression of AS progression.

Abbreviations

AS:Atherosclerosis
SHTL:Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo
Ox-LDL:Oxidized low-density lipoprotein
PPAR-γ:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ
LXR-α:Liver X receptor-α
ABCA1:ATP-binding cassette subfamily A member 1
TCM:Traditional Chinese medicine
LPS:Lipopolysaccharide
DiI-Ox-LDL:DiI-labeled Ox-LDL
HFD:High-fat diet.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

ZZ performed in vitro experiments and drafted the manuscript. LZ and SS assisted with HPLC analyses. JL and DW assisted with in vitro experiments. LS, DZ, and WZ interpreted the data and modified the manuscript. XL and YC designed this study.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1702103, 2018YFC170203, and 2019YFC1709901), the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (JDZX2015046), the Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Jilin Province (2017214), and the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Jilin Province (20160101192JC, 20190101010JH, and 20200201573JC).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1 is a supplement to the result The Target Prediction of SHTL by Network Pharmacology; the disease target network verified the central role of PPAR-γ in regulating AS, inflammation, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and other diseases. Supplementary Figure S1: the disease target network of SHTL was shown by Gephi. The bigger circles represented the disease, and the smaller circles represented the predicted targets. Supplementary Figure S2 is a supplement to the result SHTL Activates the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway in the Ox-LDL-Induced Macrophages. Supplementary Figure S2: the effect of Ox-LDL induction and SHTL treatment on ABCA1 and LXR-α mRNA levels in MPMs. (A) Mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) were stimulated without or with Ox-LDL (40 μg/mL). The time-dependent effect of Ox-LDL in MPMs was evaluated using qPCR analysis after the normalization of β-actin. (B) MPMs were incubated with SHTL for 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. The time-dependent effect of SHTL in MPMs was evaluated using qPCR analysis after the normalization of β-actin. Supplementary Figure S3 is a supplementary support to the result SHTL Attenuates LPS- and Ox-LDL-Induced Lipid Accumulation through the Activation of the PPAR-γ/LXR-α/ABCA1 Pathway in Macrophages. Supplementary Figure S3: the effect of DiI-Ox-LDL or combined with LPS on lipid accumulation in MPMs. After LPS incubation for 8 h, the lipid accumulation in MPMs was detected by DiI-Ox-LDL staining using flow cytometry. The blue line was the DiI-Ox-LDL group and the red line was LPS+DiI-Ox-LDL group. Supplementary Table 1 is the HPLC gradient elution process. Supplementary Table 2 is the sequences of primers used in the qRT-PCR. Supplementary Table 3 is the top 20 enrichment pathways of the Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo formula. It is the raw data for Figure 4(b). Term description was given for each name of the top 20 pathways. value, Benjamini value, coverage, and enrich ratio were predictive attributes of each pathway. Supplementary Table 4 is the significant enrichment of diseases and their targets that belong to the Shen-Hong-Tong-Luo formula. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. V. Sathiyakumar, K. Kapoor, S. R. Jones, M. Banach, S. S. Martin, and P. P. Toth, “Novel therapeutic targets for managing Dyslipidemia,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 733–747, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. Libby, J. Loscalzo, P. M. Ridker et al., “Inflammation, immunity, and infection in Atherothrombosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 72, no. 17, pp. 2071–2081, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Libby, J. E. Buring, L. Badimon et al., “Atherosclerosis,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 5, no. 1, article 56, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. J. Cao, “Macrophages in cardiovascular homeostasis and disease,” Circulation, vol. 138, no. 22, pp. 2452–2455, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Q. Wang, Z. H. Liu, L. Xue et al., “C1q/TNF-related protein 1 links macrophage lipid metabolism to inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 250, pp. 38–45, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Raghavan, N. K. Singh, S. Gali, A. M. Mani, and G. N. Rao, “Protein Kinase Cθ Via Activating Transcription Factor 2-Mediated CD36 Expression and Foam Cell Formation of Ly6ChiCells Contributes to Atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 138, no. 21, pp. 2395–2412, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. X. Xian, Y. Ding, M. Dieckmann et al., “LRP1 integrates murine macrophage cholesterol homeostasis and inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis,” eLife, vol. 6, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Xu, H. Y. Tan, S. Li, and Y. Feng, “Molecular mechanisms involved in oxidative stress-associated liver injury induced by Chinese herbal medicine: an experimental evidence-based literature review and network pharmacology study,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 2745, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Xu, Y. Zhai, and J. Wang, “The role of PPAR and its cross-talk with CAR and LXR in obesity and atherosclerosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 1260, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. N. Orekhov, N. Mukhamedova, E. A. Ivanova, and M. Rizzo, “PPAR in cardiovascular disorders,” PPAR Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 6293629, 2 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. I. Choi, “Astaxanthin as a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) modulator: its therapeutic implications,” Marine Drugs, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 242, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Sallam, M. Jones, B. J. Thomas et al., “Transcriptional regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis by a long noncoding RNA,” Nature Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 304–312, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. C. Li, K. K. Brown, M. J. Silvestre, T. M. Willson, W. Palinski, and C. K. Glass, “Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor–deficient mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 523–531, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C.-h. Li, D. Gong, L.-y. Chen et al., “Puerarin promotes ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux and decreases cellular lipid accumulation in THP-1 macrophages,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 811, pp. 74–86, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Qiao and W. Chen, “Atheroprotective effects and molecular targets of bioactive compounds from traditional Chinese medicine,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 135, pp. 212–229, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Wang, M. Niimi, T. Watanabe, Y. Wang, J. Liang, and J. Fan, “Treatment of atherosclerosis by traditional Chinese medicine: Questions and quandaries,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 277, pp. 136–144, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y.-L. Yin, M.-L. Zhu, J. Wan et al., “Traditional Chinese medicine xin-mai-jia recouples endothelial nitric oxide synthase to prevent atherosclerosis in vivo,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 43508, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Zhang, H. Meng, Y. Zhang et al., “The Therapeutical effect of Chinese medicine for the treatment of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 5086–5096, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Chen, Y. Deng, Y. Cui, and J. Zhang, “Study on the scheme of Chinese medicine intervention on stable angina pectoris based on phlegm and blood stasis,” Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 939–941, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Lv, S. Fan, and W. Li, “Influence of Shenhong Tongluo granules in apoptosis in atherosclerosis plaques of ApoE-/- mice and its mechanisms of anti-atherosclerosis,” Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition), vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 882–886, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  21. Q. Huang, T. Lan, J. Lu et al., “DiDang tang inhibits endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis induced by oxygen glucose deprivation and Intracerebral Hemorrhage through blockade of the GRP78-IRE1/PERK pathways,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 9, article 1423, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Zhang, X. Ma, X. Li, T. Zhang, M. Qin, and L. Ren, “Effects of Icariin on atherosclerosis and predicted function regulatory network in ApoE deficient mice,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 9424186, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Wang, M. Subramanian, A. Yurdagul Jr. et al., “Mitochondrial Fission Promotes the Continued Clearance of Apoptotic Cells by Macrophages,” Cell, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 331–345.e22, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. Zhao, L. Ma, C. Cai, and X. Gong, “Caffeine inhibits NLRP3 Inflammasome activation by suppressing MAPK/NF-κB and A2aR Signaling in LPS-induced THP-1 macrophages,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1571–1581, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Chen, J. Wei, Y. Zhang et al., “Anti-endometriosis mechanism of Jiawei Foshou san based on network pharmacology,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 9, p. 811, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. I. Kourtzelis, X. Li, I. Mitroulis et al., “DEL-1 promotes macrophage efferocytosis and clearance of inflammation,” Nature Immunology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. C. Doran, L. Ozcan, B. Cai et al., “CAMKIIγ suppresses an efferocytosis pathway in macrophages and promotes atherosclerotic plaque necrosis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 127, no. 11, pp. 4075–4089, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L.-Y. Yang, C. G. Yu, X. H. Wang et al., “Angiopoietin‐Like Protein 4 Is a High‐Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Component for HDL Metabolism and Function in Nondiabetic Participants and Type‐2 Diabetic Patients,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 6, no. 6, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. T. N. Tran, M. Hamada, H. Jeon et al., “MafB is a critical regulator of complement component C1q,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, article 1700, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Zhang, M. H. Liu, L. Qiao et al., “Ginsenoside Rb1 enhances atherosclerotic plaque stability by skewing macrophages to the M2 phenotype,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 409–416, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Z. Liu, F. Guo, Y. Wang et al., “BATMAN-TCM: a bioinformatics analysis tool for molecular mechANism of traditional Chinese medicine,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 21146, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. Parente, F. de Filippis, D. Ercolini, A. Ricciardi, and T. Zotta, “Advancing integration of data on food microbiome studies: FoodMicrobionet 3.1, a major upgrade of the FoodMicrobionet database,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 305, article 108249, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Su, C. Guo, M. Liu, X. Liang, and B. Yang, “Therapeutic targets of vitamin C on liver injury and associated biological mechanisms: A study of network pharmacology,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 66, pp. 383–387, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Chen, W. Lou, B. Ding, and X. Wang, “Overexpressed pseudogenes, DUXAP8 and DUXAP9, promote growth of renal cell carcinoma and serve as unfavorable prognostic biomarkers,” Aging, vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 5666–5688, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. S. Kappus, A. J. Murphy, S. Abramowicz et al., “Activation of liver X receptor decreases atherosclerosis in Ldlr-/- mice in the absence of ATP-binding cassette transporters A1 and G1 in myeloid cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 279–284, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Hafiane, K. Gasbarrino, and S. S. Daskalopoulou, “The role of adiponectin in cholesterol efflux and HDL biogenesis and metabolism,” Metabolism, vol. 100, article 153953, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Alaarg, M. L. Senders, A. Varela-Moreira et al., “A systematic comparison of clinically viable nanomedicines targeting HMG-CoA reductase in inflammatory atherosclerosis,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 262, pp. 47–57, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. V. Devarakonda, F. E. Pereira, J. D. Smith, L. H. Shapiro, and M. Ghosh, “CD13 deficiency leads to increased oxidative stress and larger atherosclerotic lesions,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 287, pp. 70–80, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. B. Vasamsetti, S. Karnewar, R. Gopoju et al., “Resveratrol attenuates monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and associated inflammation via modulation of intracellular GSH homeostasis: Relevance in atherosclerosis,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 96, pp. 392–405, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. C. Gage, N. Bécares, R. Louie et al., “Disrupting LXRα phosphorylation promotes FoxM1 expression and modulates atherosclerosis by inducing macrophage proliferation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 28, pp. E6556–E6565, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. X. Q. Wang, Z. H. Liu, L. Xue et al., “C1q/TNF-related protein 1 links macrophage lipid metabolism to inflammation and atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 250, pp. 38–45, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F.-Y. Chen, J. Zhou, N. Guo et al., “Curcumin retunes cholesterol transport homeostasis and inflammation response in M1 macrophage to prevent atherosclerosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 467, no. 4, pp. 872–878, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. R. F. Linton and S. Fazio, “Macrophages, inflammation, and atherosclerosis,” International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, vol. 27, no. S3, pp. S35–S40, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H.-H. Chen, K. Keyhanian, X. Zhou et al., “IRF2BP2 reduces macrophage inflammation and susceptibility to atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 671–683, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Wu, X. Chen, Y. Wang et al., “Aortic plaque-targeted andrographolide delivery with oxidation-sensitive micelle effectively treats atherosclerosis via simultaneous ROS capture and anti-inflammation,” Nanomedicine : Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2215–2226, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X.-L. Lu, C.-H. Zhao, X.-L. Yao, and H. Zhang, “Quercetin attenuates high fructose feeding-induced atherosclerosis by suppressing inflammation and apoptosis via ROS-regulated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 85, pp. 658–671, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Zhao, C. Lv, Q. Wu et al., “Computational systems pharmacology reveals an antiplatelet and neuroprotective mechanism of Deng-Zhan-Xi-Xin injection in the treatment of ischemic stroke,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 147, p. 104365, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Zheng, M. Wu, H. Wang et al., “Network pharmacology to unveil the biological basis of health-strengthening herbal medicine in Cancer treatment,” Cancers, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 461, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Zeng, K. Yang, H. Liu, and G. Zhang, “A network pharmacology approach to investigate the pharmacological effects of Guizhi Fuling wan on uterine fibroids,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 4697–4710, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Kang, Y. Nakanishi, Y. Kioi et al., “Semaphorin 6D reverse signaling controls macrophage lipid metabolism and anti-inflammatory polarization,” Nature Immunology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 561–570, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Zepeng Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views350
Downloads239
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.