Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Oxidative Stress in Pathologies and Aging: Molecular Mechanisms, Therapies and Perspectives 2021

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 4136071 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4136071

Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Željko Reiner, Mona Alidadi, Matthew Kroh, Vladimiro Cardenia, Suowen Xu, Khalid Al-Rasadi, Raul D. Santos, Amirhossein Sahebkar, "The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Circulating Levels of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins Is Apparently Independent of Changes in Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 4136071, 13 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4136071

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Circulating Levels of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoproteins Is Apparently Independent of Changes in Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Academic Editor: Claudio Cabello-Verrugio
Received05 Aug 2021
Revised10 Oct 2021
Accepted15 Nov 2021
Published06 Dec 2021

Abstract

Background. Obesity is related to dyslipidemia and increased circulating oxidated LDL (ox-LDL) concentrations that may predispose to atherosclerosis. Bariatric surgery may lower the risk of cardiovascular mortality. Elevated plasma ox-LDL has been associated with atherogenesis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of bariatric surgery on proatherogenic circulating ox-LDL levels in patients with severe obesity. Methods. Four databases were systematically searched from inception to May 1, 2021. Also, to clarify the heterogeneity of studies with regard to treatment duration, research design, and the demographic features, a random-effects model and the generic inverse variance weighting approach were utilized. To determine the association with the estimated effect size, a random-effect meta-regression approach was performed. Finally, a meta-regression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of, respectively, baseline and changes in body mass index (BMI), baseline ox-LDL, and postsurgery follow-up period with the estimated effect size of surgery on ox-LDL levels. Results. Meta-analysis of 11 studies including 470 subjects showed a significant decline in circulating ox-LDL following bariatric surgery (SMD: -0.971, 95% CI: -1.317, -0.626, , : 89.43%). The results of meta-regression did not show any significant association between the changes in ox-LDL after bariatric surgery and baseline BMI, duration of follow-up or baseline ox-LDL values. However, there was a significant association between ox-LDL alteration and percentage of BMI change. Conclusion. Bariatric surgery in patients who had severe obesity causes a decrease of circulating ox-LDL that was apparently dependent in BMI changes.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a major risk factor for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [1]. Obesity is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia, low-grade inflammation, and an overall prothrombotic state [24]. Dyslipidemia, and especially elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, is a pivotal risk factor for atherosclerosis [5]. It is well established that atherogenesis begins with endothelial dysfunction or damage. When LDL particles rich in cholesterol are present in plasma in larger quantities, they permeate through the altered endothelium into the subendothelial space entering the intima. Once this occurs, the LDL particles are oxidized by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and modified into oxidated LDL (ox-LDL) [6, 7]. Ox-LDL particles are strong ligands for macrophage scavenger receptors (CD36, SR-AI/II, and SR-BI) allowing them to enter macrophages and transform them into foam cells [8]. Foam cells, when piled up, appear macroscopically as fatty streaks which are an important step towards fibro-lipid atherosclerotic plaques build-up. Therefore, it is not surprising that increased circulating ox-LDL levels are linked to clinical ASCVD events [9].

Bariatric surgery is a durable and effective therapeutic approach in severely obese individuals. Most endocrinology societies recommend surgical therapy for individuals with or for those with a BMI ranging from 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 and comorbidities who may benefit from weight reduction, as well as for severe obese individuals with a BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2 and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. The most common types of bariatric surgery are sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGP), one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB), laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), and biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (BPD/DS) [10]. Weight loss following bariatric surgery can lower ASCVD risk as well as ensuing mortality in severely obese individuals [1115].

Since severe obesity is associated with dyslipidemia and increased LDL oxidation that may predispose to atherosclerosis and its ominous consequences, it would be important to verify if bariatric surgery would reduce oxidative stress.

Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the effect of bariatric surgery on levels of circulating ox-LDL.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This systematic review and meta-analysis were done based on the 2009 preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [16]. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 1, 2021, using keywords in abstracts and titles (also in combination with MESH terms) as follows: (“bariatric surgery” OR gastroplast OR “gastric bypass” OR “Roux-en-Y” OR “gastric band” OR “biliopancreatic diversion” OR gastrectom OR “duodenal switch” OR “gastrointestinal diversion” OR gastroenterostom OR “jejunoileal bypass” OR “obesity surgery” OR “weight loss surgery” OR “weight-loss surgery” OR “bariatric procedure” OR “sleeve surgery” OR “metabolic surgery”) AND (“oxidized low density lipoprotein” OR “oxidized LDL” OR “OxLDL” OR “ox-LDL” OR “oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein” OR “minimally modified oxidized-LDL” OR “MM-LDL” OR “MMLDL” OR “malondialdehyde-low density lipoprotein” OR “malondialdehyde low density lipoprotein” OR “MDA-LDL” OR “MDALDL”).

2.2. Study Selection

For inclusion, only original peer-reviewed studies written in English language were considered. All forms of bariatric surgery procedures were taken into account. Articles must have reported circulating ox-LDL before and after surgery. The exclusion criteria were only abstracts, letters, case reports, comments, meta-analyses, duplicate studies, animal studies, reviews, non-English papers, studies with no surgical intervention, and studies without outcomes.

2.3. Data Extraction

Following the removal of duplicate research, two independent authors reviewed the abstracts and titles of the remaining papers for inclusion. The whole texts of the applicable studies were collected. When two papers with the same research purpose were published by the same organization and/or authors, the study published more recently with a larger sample size was included. Any differences were discussed by authors. The following data was gathered from studies which were eligible for inclusion: (1) the name of the first author, (2) the year of publication, (3) the type of surgery, (4) the study design, (5) the characteristics of the patients, (6) oxidized LDL levels, and (7) the period of follow-up.

2.4. Quality Assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was performed to evaluate the study quality in this meta-analysis [17]. Three features of each eligible study are taken into account for this scale: (1) the selection of the studied patients (4 items), (2) the comparability of the studied populations (1 item), and (3) the ascertainment of the exposure (3 items) in case-control studies or outcome of interest in cohort studies.

2.5. Quantitative Data Synthesis

Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V2 software (Biostat, NJ) [18]. Information regarding sample size, means, and standard deviations from each group were extracted to calculate the standardized mean differences (SMDs). SMD was applied since several different assays were utilized to determine plasma ox-LDL levels. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to get overall estimate of effect size. Postoperative mean and SD were used to calculate the final effect size. To clarify the heterogeneity of studies regarding treatment duration, design of study, and the characteristics of the studied populations, a random-effects model (owing to interstudy heterogeneity) and the generic inverse variance weighting method were utilized [16]. Clinical heterogeneity was judged by study locations and recruited populations, methods applied for ox-LDL assay, baseline ox-LDL values, and differences in biochemical parameters among studied populations. Statistical heterogeneity was appraised by index and Cochrane’s test. The mean and standard deviation were calculated using the method described by Hozo et al. if the outcome measures were reported as median and range (or 95 percent confidence interval (CI)) [19]. When only standard error of the mean (SEM) was supplied, SD was calculated using the following formula: , where “” denotes the number of participants. A sensitivity analysis using the leave-one-out approach was carried out to explore the impact of each study on the overall effect size (i.e., deleting one study each time and repeating the analysis) [20, 21].

2.6. Meta-Regression

A meta-regression analysis was carried out to investigate the impact of, respectively, baseline and changes in BMI, baseline ox-LDL and duration of postsurgery follow-up with the estimated effect size of surgery on ox-LDL concentrations.

2.7. Subgroup Analysis

A subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of follow-up duration (≥12 months and <12 months) with the estimated effect size of surgery on ox-LDL concentrations.

2.8. GRADE Scoring

We used the grade of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the strength of evidence for each outcome [22]. To summarize the findings for each outcome, the GRADEpro GDT software was used. We assigned four points to each outcome and then evaluated factors that reduced the quality of the evidence. For each outcome, points were reduced based on the presence of the following; the overall RoB for each study, inconsistency (significant heterogeneity), indirectness (significant differences in the population, comparisons, and outcomes), and imprecision (the size of the cohort, width, and significance of the confidence intervals (CIs)). As a result, we classified the evidence into four groups depending on the aggregate GRADE ratings for each intervention: high-grade evidence (at least 4 points), moderate grade evidence (3 points), low-grade evidence (2 points), and very low-grade evidence (1 point).

2.9. Publication Bias

In the meta-analysis, the funnel plot was used to realize the presence of publication bias. Hence, Begg’s rank correlation and Egger’s weighted regression tests were often performed to help publication bias detection. When asymmetry in the funnel plot was found, potentially missing studies were inserted using the “trim and fill” method. In the event of a significant result, the “fail-safe N” approach was used to compute the number of potentially missing studies required to make the value nonsignificant. This is another sign of publishing bias [23].

3. Results

A thorough database search identified 93 published papers, 43 of which were directly connected to the issue of this study. After careful consideration, 32 studies were excluded:10 studies were reviews, 17 studies did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 5 studies did not disclose enough data. As a result, 11 studies which evaluated the levels of ox-LDL after bariatric surgery were included (Table 1). The study selection procedure was indicated in Figure 1.


Author, year, countryDesign of studyFollow-upType of surgeryControl ()OutcomePatients’ characteristic
Age
Sex
No. of patients
ox-LDL methods of ox-LDL assessmentBMI change (%)

Carmona-Maurici et al., 2020 [24]
Spain
Prospective observational cohort study6 months
12 months
Laparoscopic RYGB or SGSignificant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-32.27Obese patients with atheromatous plaque
years old
18 (F)/14 (M)
32
-33.91Obese patients without atheromatous plaque
years old
29 (F)/5 (M)
34
Ho et al., 2021 [25]Prospective, observational study6 months
12 months
RYGB, SG, or omega loop bypassPatients seeking weight management [16]Unchanged
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-29.95Morbid obesity patients
years old
-
59
Coimbra et al., 2019 [26]Observational study13 monthsLaparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB)Healthy volunteers [17]Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-11.85Obese patients
years old
18 (F)/2 (M)
20
Gomez-Martin et al., 2018 [27]Observational study6 months
12 months
SGWomen matched for age and cardiovascular risk (modified Mediterranean diet)
[18]
Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels after 12 months in comparison to baseline and control group
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-28.83Obese women
years old
20
Laparoscopic RYGB-33.82Obese women
years old
20
Kelly et al., 2016 [28]Longitudinal cohort6 months
12 months
RYGB or vertical SGSignificant decrease in ox-LDL levels at 12 months
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-32.6Adolescents with severe obesity
years old
10 (M)/29 (F)
39
3 months
12 months
Laparoscopic RYGBUnchanged
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-35.6Adolescents with severe obesity
years old
3 (M)/10 (F)
13
Müller-Stich et al., 2015 [29]Prospective cohort6 months
12 months
RYGBUnchanged
(OxiSelect MDA-LDL-quantitation kit)
-25Patients with BMI more than 35 kg/m2 and insulin-dependent T2DM
years old
10 (M)/10 (F)
20
Van der Schueren et al., 2015 [30]Observational study4 months
7 years
Laparoscopic RYGBLean controls
[24]
Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels at 7 years
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-26.6Obese patients
years old
5 (M)/12 (F)
17
Julve et al., 2014 [31]Observational study6 months
12 months
RYGBSignificant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
Obese patients
20-60 years old
15 (F)/6 (M)
21
Martín-Rodríguez et al., 2014 [32]Prospective cohort12 monthsBariatric surgeryLean
Control subjects
[30]
Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels (immunodiagnostic system)-31.37Obese patients without metabolic syndrome
years old
19(F)/4(M)
23
-16.33Obese patients with metabolic syndrome
years old
34(F)/5(M)
39
Garrido-Sánchez et al., 2008 [33]Observational study7 monthsBiliopancreatic diversion, or RYGBHealthy, nonobese persons
[11]
Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-33.9Morbidly obese patients with:21
Normal fasting glucose
years old
14(F)/7(M)
-30.39Impaired fasting glucose
 years old
21(F)/10(M)
31
-30.74Type 2 diabetes
 years old
14(F)/7(M)
21
Uzun et al., 2004 [34]Observational study6 monthsOpen Swedish adjustable gastric band (SAGB)Significant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-24.24Morbidly obese patients
 years old
10(F)/10(M)
20
Laparoscopic SAGBSignificant decrease in ox-LDL levels
(Mercodia ox-LDL kit)
-24.27Morbidly obese patients
 years old
11(F)/9(M)
20

3.1. Quality Assessment of the Included Studies

All selected studies showed insufficient information for case definition, and most of them had lack of information for representativeness of the cases. Because most of the studies did not include a control group, they were not evaluated for selection of controls, definition of controls, comparability, the same method of ascertainment, and nonresponse rate. However, all studies which included met the ascertainment of exposure criteria. Table 2 shows the details of quality assessment.


StudySelectionComparabilityExposure
Case definitionRepresentativeness of the casesSelection of controlsDefinition of controlsComparability of cases and controlsAscertainment of exposureSame method of ascertainmentNonresponse rate

Ho et al. 2021
Carmona-Maurici et al. 2020
Coimbra et al. 2019
Gómez-Martín et al. 2018
Kelly et al. 2016
Van der Schueren et al. 2015
Müller-Stich et al. 2015
Martín-Rodríguez et al. 2014
Julve et al. 2014
Garrido-Sánchez et al. 2008
Uzun et al. 2004

Only for comparability a maximum of two stars can be given.
3.2. Assay Methods

In most of the included studies, serum ox-LDL was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Nine studies used Mercodia ox-LDL kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) [2428, 30, 31, 33, 34], one study used immunodiagnostic system (Boldon, UK) [32], and one study used OxiSelect MDA-LDL-Quantitation kit (Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, USA) [29].

3.3. Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Circulating Concentrations of Oxidized LDL

Meta-analysis of 11 publications including 470 subjects demonstrated a significant reduction of circulating ox-LDL following bariatric surgery (SMD: -0.971, 95% CI: -1.317, -0.626, , : 89.43%) (Figure 2(a)). In the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the reduction in circulating ox-LDL was robust (Figure 2(b)) (low-grade evidence, Table 3).


Summary of findings:
Effect of bariatric surgery on circulating levels of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in obese patients
Patient or population: obese patients
Setting: -
Intervention: bariatric surgery
Comparison: -

Outcome no. of participants (studies)Relative effect (95% CI)Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)CertaintyWhat happens
Difference

Ox_LDL levels (ox-LDL) assessed with: ELISA/Mercodia/immunodiagnostic/OxiSelect follow-up: range 6 months to 7 years no. of participants: 470 (11 observational studies)The mean ox-LDL levels were 00 (0 to 0)⨁⨁◯◯
Lowa,b,c
The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval

GRADE working group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

3.4. Subgroup Analysis

A subgroup analysis was also performed based on follow-up duration (≥12 months and <12 months). Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant reduction of circulating ox-LDL following bariatric surgery in both follow-up periods (≥12 months and <12 months ). However, this analysis did not show significant associations between follow-up duration and change in ox-LDL levels () (Figure 3).

3.5. Meta-Regression

Random-effects meta-regression was used to assess the effect of potential confounders on the ox-LDL reducing effect of bariatric surgery. The results did not designate any significant association between the changes in ox-LDL and baseline BMI (slope: 0.018; 95% CI: -0.041, 0.078; ), follow-up duration (slope: -0.007; 95% CI: -0.028, 0.012; ) or baseline ox-LDL (slope: 0.00005; 95% CI: -0.00005, 0.00016; ). However, there was a significant association between changes in ox-LDL and percentage of BMI change (slope: 0.069; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.135; ) (Figures 4(a)4(d)).

3.6. Publication Bias

Egger’s linear regression test (, ; , -5.533, , , two-tailed ) and Begg’s rank correlation test (Kendall’s Tau with continuity , , two-tailed ) indicated the presence of publication bias in this meta-analysis of bariatric surgery effects on circulating ox-LDL. Trim-and-fill analysis revealed that among all included papers in meta-analysis, there could be five missing studies. The “fail-safe N” test showed that 817 missing studies were required to reduce the effect size to a nonsignificant () value (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The results of this meta-analysis revealed a substantial decrease of circulating ox-LDL after bariatric surgery. Of importance, the results of meta-regression did not reveal any significant relationship between the changes in baseline BMI, duration of follow-up or baseline ox-LDL value, and ox-LDL after bariatric surgery. However, there was significant association between the changes in ox-LDL after bariatric surgery and percentage of BMI change.

Some authors have tried to explain the beneficial effect of bariatric surgery on ASCVD by decreasing not only body weight, oxysterols, and ox-LDL but also by decreasing plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), which is elevated in extremely obese patients and by decreased proliferation of vasa vasorum [35]. Bariatric surgery is a well-documented technique for weight loss can have numerous favorable consequences, such as rise in GLP-1 and its potential function in the metabolism including remission of T2DM [36]. Furthermore, bariatric surgery may be a useful therapy for people who have cardiovascular risk factors [37]. Also, bariatric surgery decreases oxidative stress parameters and glycoproteins and increases antioxidant enzymes paraoxonase-1 and catalase as well, which supports the idea that this procedure decreases oxidation of lipoproteins thus having antiatherogenic effects [34, 35].

Others have tried to explain the beneficial effect of bariatric surgery, besides reducing oxysterols and ox-LDL, by increasing not only HDL-cholesterol but also the number of larger HDL particles which are more atheroprotective and reducing the number of small HDL particles which are less protective [9]. Bariatric surgery, apart from decreasing ox-LDL, also reduces the levels of triglycerides and often decreases the number of LDL particles with a decreased proportion of smaller, more atherogenic LDL particles [38]. Already two decades ago, it has been proposed that small dense LDL particles confer greater risk for atherosclerosis and ASCVD than large, buoyant LDL particles, which might be attributed to the greater oxidative vulnerability of small dense LDL [39].

BMI is an indicator of general obesity and demonstrates significant associations with CVDs and ASCVD risk factor. However, as previously suggested, our data support a direct relationship between the magnitude of improvement in cardiovascular risk factors and the amount of BMI reduction [40]. These consequences may be related to positive correlation between change in serum LDL—as a marker of cardiovascular status—and change in BMI [41]. Furthermore, weight loss-induced LDL reduction might decrease the circulating level of the substrate (i.e., LDL particles) for oxidation, and this could partially account for reduction in the generation of ox-LDL [42]. Also, some think that waist circumference, which has been shown to be associated with elevated ASCVD risk, is a better indicator of abdominal obesity [43]. The others suggest that waist-to-hip ratio is even better for measuring abdominal obesity, and it has been proven that this measure corresponds with ASCVD [44].

The favorable effects of bariatric surgery are most likely to be multifactorial [45]. It should be highlighted that weight reduction is not always required to see improvements in some of with ASCVD risks. Indeed, there is considerable evidence to imply that bariatric surgery may cause changes in oxidative stress, inflammation, and adipokines via nonweight loss pathways [28].

Also, this rather surprising issue that bariatric surgery can improve markers of cardiovascular disorders among patients with severe obesity as long as body fat mass is redistributed or replaced by muscle mass independent of significant weight loss needs further investigation.

This study has some advantages. One of them is that this is the first meta-analysis trying to establish the effect of bariatric surgery on circulating ox-LDL in patients with severe obesity. Further investigations should focus on this premise. This meta-analysis has some limitations as well. The studies which were included had an overall relatively small number of patients. Also, there is heterogeneity in types of operations performed, with known differences in metabolic effects between operations. Also, the methods for measuring ox-LDL concentrations in some studies included in this meta-analysis were different and might have explained heterogeneity in our findings. Besides, the quality of the evidence which was evaluated with GRADE approach was low. Additionally, the time intervals and follow-up compliance are not known in some of the reported studies.

In conclusion, bariatric surgery seems to cause a decrease of circulating ox-LDL which is associated with percentage of BMI change, baseline BMI, duration of follow-up, or baseline ox-LDL value. Future studies may focus on the potential neurohormonal effects that could contribute to this reduction, both dependent and independent of weight loss factors.

Data Availability

There is not any raw data associated with this review article.

Additional Points

Key Points. (i) Obesity is related to increased circulating oxidated LDL (ox-LDL) and atherosclerotic risks. (ii) Bariatric surgery may lower the risk of cardiovascular mortality. (iii) Bariatric surgery in severely obese causes a decrease of circulating ox-LDL.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Tannaz Jamialahmadi was supported by the Wael-Almahmeed & IAS research training grant. RDS is a recipient of a research scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Brazil, (CNPq) #303734/2018-3.

References

  1. N. Wiebe, P. Stenvinkel, and M. Tonelli, “Associations of chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and severe obesity with mortality, myocardial infarction, cancer, and chronic pulmonary disease,” JAMA network open, vol. 2, no. 8, article e1910456, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Chait and L. J. den Hartigh, “Adipose tissue distribution, inflammation and its metabolic consequences, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease,” Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, vol. 7, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Bray, K. Kim, J. Wilding, and on behalf of the World Obesity Federation, “Obesity: a chronic relapsing progressive disease process. A position statement of the World Obesity Federation,” Obesity reviews, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 715–723, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. J. Fuster, N. Ouchi, N. Gokce, and K. Walsh, “Obesity-induced changes in adipose tissue microenvironment and their impact on cardiovascular disease,” Circulation research, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 1786–1807, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. Graham, M.-T. Cooney, D. Bradley, A. Dudina, and Z. Reiner, “Dyslipidemias in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: risks and causality,” Current cardiology reports, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 709–720, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. Harrison, K. K. Griendling, U. Landmesser, B. Hornig, and H. Drexler, “Role of oxidative stress in atherosclerosis,” The American journal of cardiology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 7–11, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Carnevale, S. Bartimoccia, C. Nocella et al., “LDL oxidation by platelets propagates platelet activation via an oxidative stress-mediated mechanism,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. J. Binder, N. Papac-Milicevic, and J. L. Witztum, “Innate sensing of oxidation-specific epitopes in health and disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 485–497, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Gao, D. Zhao, M. Wang et al., “Association between circulating oxidized LDL and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1624–1632, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Coelho, J. Crane, R. Agius, and B. McGowan, “The bariatric-metabolic physician’s role in managing clinically severe obesity,” Current Obesity Reports, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 263–273, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Kaul, A. Kumar, A. Baksi et al., “Impact of bariatric surgery on carotid intima-medial thickness and cardiovascular risk: results of a prospective study,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 6006–6012, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. L. Syn, D. E. Cummings, L. Z. Wang et al., “Association of metabolic-bariatric surgery with long-term survival in adults with and without diabetes: a one-stage meta-analysis of matched cohort and prospective controlled studies with 174 772 participants,” The Lancet, vol. 397, no. 10287, pp. 1830–1841, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. G. Doumouras, J. A. Wong, J. M. Paterson et al., “Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study,” Circulation, vol. 143, no. 15, pp. 1468–1480, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Weinbrenner, H. Schröder, V. Escurriol et al., “Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with increased waist circumference independent of body mass index in men and women,” The American journal of clinical nutrition, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. S. Kelly, D. R. Jacobs Jr., A. R. Sinaiko, A. Moran, L. M. Steffen, and J. Steinberger, “Relation of circulating oxidized LDL to obesity and insulin resistance in children,” Pediatric diabetes, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 552–555, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Sutton, K. R. Abrams, D. R. Jones, D. R. Jones, T. A. Sheldon, and F. Song, Methods for meta-analysis in medical research, Wiley Chichester, 2000.
  17. G. A. Wells, B. Shea, D. O’Connell et al., The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses, Oxford, 2000, , http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.aspref.
  18. M. Borenstein, L. Hedges, J. Higgins, and H. Rothstein, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, Version 2 Biostat, Englewood NJ, 2005.
  19. S. P. Hozo, B. Djulbegovic, and I. Hozo, “Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample,” BMC medical research methodology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Banach, C. Serban, S. Ursoniu et al., “Statin therapy and plasma coenzyme Q10 concentrations—A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 99, pp. 329–336, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Sahebkar, C. Serban, S. Ursoniu et al., “Lack of efficacy of resveratrol on C-reactive protein and selected cardiovascular risk factors—Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 189, pp. 47–55, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, G. E. Vist et al., “GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations,” BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7650, pp. 924–926, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Duval and R. Tweedie, “Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis,” Biometrics, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 455–463, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Carmona-Maurici, E. Cuello, E. Sánchez et al., “Impact of bariatric surgery on subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with morbid obesity,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1419–1428, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. H. Ho, S. Adam, Y. Liu et al., “Effect of bariatric surgery on plasma levels of oxidised phospholipids, biomarkers of oxidised LDL and lipoprotein(a),” Journal of clinical lipidology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 320–331, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Coimbra, F. Reis, C. Ferreira et al., “Weight loss achieved by bariatric surgery modifies high-density lipoprotein subfractions and low-density lipoprotein oxidation towards atheroprotection,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 63, pp. 46–53, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. M. Gómez-Martin, J. A. Balsa, E. Aracil et al., “Beneficial changes on plasma apolipoproteins A and B, high density lipoproteins and oxidized low density lipoproteins in obese women after bariatric surgery: comparison between gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 145, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. S. Kelly, J. R. Ryder, K. L. Marlatt, K. D. Rudser, T. Jenkins, and T. H. Inge, “Changes in inflammation, oxidative stress and adipokines following bariatric surgery among adolescents with severe obesity,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 275–280, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. P. Müller-Stich, A. T. Billeter, T. Fleming, L. Fischer, M. W. Büchler, and P. P. Nawroth, “Nitrosative stress but not glycemic parameters correlate with improved neuropathy in nonseverely obese diabetic patients after Roux-Y gastric bypass,” Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 847–854, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. B. van der Schueren, R. Vangoitsenhoven, B. Geeraert et al., “Low cytochrome oxidase 4I1 links mitochondrial dysfunction to obesity and type 2 diabetes in humans and mice,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1254–1263, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Julve, E. Pardina, M. Pérez-Cuéllar et al., “Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients improves the atherogenic qualitative properties of the plasma lipoproteins,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 200–205, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Martín-Rodríguez, A. Cervera-Barajas, A. Madrazo-Atutxa et al., “Effect of bariatric surgery on microvascular dysfunction associated to metabolic syndrome: a 12-month prospective study,” International journal of obesity, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1410–1415, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Garrido-Sanchez, J. M. Garcia-Almeida, S. Garcia-Serrano et al., “Improved carbohydrate metabolism after bariatric surgery raises antioxidized LDL antibody levels in morbidly obese patients,” Diabetes Care, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2258–2264, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Uzun, K. Zengin, M. Taskin, S. Aydin, G. Simsek, and N. Dariyerli, “Changes in leptin, plasminogen activator factor and oxidative stress in morbidly obese patients following open and laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding,” Obesity surgery, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 659–665, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Carmona-Maurici, N. Amigó, E. Cuello et al., “Bariatric surgery decreases oxidative stress and protein glycosylation in patients with morbid obesity,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 50, no. 11, article e13320, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. R. Hutch and D. Sandoval, “The role of GLP-1 in the metabolic success of bariatric surgery,” Endocrinology, vol. 158, no. 12, pp. 4139–4151, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Singh, A. Subramanian, N. Adderley et al., “Impact of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: a population-based cohort study,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 432–442, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. E. Bays, P. H. Jones, T. A. Jacobson et al., “Lipids and bariatric procedures part 1 of 2: scientific statement from the National Lipid Association, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, and obesity medicine association: full report,” Journal of clinical lipidology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33–57, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. L. Tribble, M. Rizzo, A. Chait, D. M. Lewis, P. J. Blanche, and R. M. Krauss, “Enhanced oxidative susceptibility and reduced antioxidant content of metabolic precursors of small, dense low-density lipoproteins,” The American journal of medicine, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. Benraouane and S. E. Litwin, “Reductions in cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery,” Current Opinion in Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 555–561, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Khalaj, A. Salman Yazdi, Z. Sabet et al., “Serum lipid profile changes after bariatric surgery,” Thrita, vol. 7, no. 2, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  42. E. Tumova, W. Sun, P. H. Jones, M. Vrablik, C. M. Ballantyne, and R. C. Hoogeveen, “The impact of rapid weight loss on oxidative stress markers and the expression of the metabolic syndrome in obese individuals,” Journal of obesity, vol. 2013, Article ID 729515, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Zhang, K. M. Rexrode, R. M. Van Dam, T. Y. Li, and F. B. Hu, “Abdominal obesity and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 13, pp. 1658–1667, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. N. T. T. Tran, C. L. Blizzard, K. N. Luong et al., “The importance of waist circumference and body mass index in cross-sectional relationships with risk of cardiovascular disease in Vietnam,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 5, article e0198202, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. K. Dimitriadis, M. S. Randeva, and A. D. Miras, “Potential hormone mechanisms of bariatric surgery,” Current obesity reports, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 253–265, 2017. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Tannaz Jamialahmadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views113
Downloads118
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.