The Beneficial Effects of Saffron Extract on Potential Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Su, Xin; Yuan, Chao; Wang, Li; Chen, Runqi; Li, Xiangying; Zhang, Yijun; Liu, Can; Liu, Xu; Liang, Wanping; Xing, Yanwei

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699821

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Natural Products in the Prevention and Treatment of ROS-induced Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6699821 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699821

The Beneficial Effects of Saffron Extract on Potential Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Xin Su,¹Chao Yuan,²Li Wang,³Runqi Chen,⁴Xiangying Li,³Yijun Zhang,⁵Can Liu,¹Xu Liu,⁶Wanping Liang,⁵and Yanwei Xing¹

Academic Editor: Guodong Zhang

Received26 Nov 2020

Revised22 Dec 2020

Accepted07 Jan 2021

Published20 Jan 2021

Abstract

Saffron is commonly used in traditional medicines and precious perfumes. It contains pharmacologically active compounds with notably potent antioxidant activity. Saffron has a variety of active components, including crocin, crocetin, and safranal. Oxidative stress plays an important role in many cardiovascular diseases, and its uncontrolled chain reaction is related to myocardial injury. Numerous studies have confirmed that saffron exact exhibits protective effects on the myocardium and might be beneficial in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. In view of the role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease, people have shown considerable interest in the potential role of saffron extract as a treatment for a range of cardiovascular diseases. This review analyzed the use of saffron in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases through antioxidant stress from four aspects: antiatherosclerosis, antimyocardial ischemia, anti-ischemia reperfusion injury, and improvement in drug-induced cardiotoxicity, particularly anthracycline-induced. Although data is limited in humans with only two clinically relevant studies, the results of preclinical studies regarding the antioxidant stress effects of saffron are promising and warrant further research in clinical trials. This review summarized the protective effect of saffron in cardiovascular diseases and drug-induced cardiotoxicity. It will facilitate pharmacological research and development and promote utilization of saffron.

1. Introduction

Crocin, crocetin, and safranal, which are active components of saffron, have been widely studied. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is a perennial flowering plant of the family Iridaceae [1, 2]. Its officinal part is obtained from the dried stigma, which is a rare spice worldwide, and it is used in the treatment of several diseases [3, 4]. Saffron is widely cultivated in Iran and southern European countries, such as Greece, and it is rarely cultivated in China [5]. Saffron was first documented in the “Collected Essentials of Species of Materia Medica” in China, even though it was used earlier than the 1500s. Its uses have been recorded during the time of the Assyrians [6]. The main active compound of saffron is crocin [7]. Crocin, a saffron glycoside, is a water-soluble carotenoid having predominantly four analogues: crocin 1, crocin 2 [8, 9], crocin 3 [10], and crocin 4 [11]. In traditional Chinese medicine, saffron is considered to promote blood circulation, remove blood stasis, and relieve pain [12]. Scientific studies have shown saffron to possess therapeutic value with multiple pharmacological effects, including antioxidant [13, 14], anti-inflammatory [15], and cardioprotective effects [16]. Additionally, some studies have shown that it confers protective effects against cardiovascular diseases [17], asthma [18], diabetes mellitus [19], Parkinson’s disease [20], depression [21], cancer [22], and other diseases.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the major causes of mortality worldwide and currently provide a considerable challenge for clinical treatments [23].CVDs were the primary cause of 17.7 million deaths worldwide in 2015, which is predicted to increase to 23.6 million by 2030 [24, 25]. In recent years, the introduction of novel drugs and innovative devices has contributed to protecting patients with cardiopathy from CVDs. Recent in vitro and in vivo studies have indicated that saffron might have cardioprotective effects by modulating oxidative stress, thereby decreasing injury to the myocardium, which protects the heart (see Figure 1). Attention has been drawn to the widespread medicinal value of saffron, and researchers have focused on its potential bioactive components and mechanisms of action, particularly antioxidant stress, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects. Few general reviews have discussed the phytochemical constituents and cardioprotective pharmacological attributes of saffron to bridge the gap among the studies in recent years. This review summarizes the protective effects of saffron compounds in CVDs and chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity to facilitate pharmacological research, development, and utilization of saffron.

Figure 1

Source and functions and of saffron extract. (a) “Collected Essentials of Species of Materia Medica.” (b) Complete morphology of saffron. (c) Prepared officinal part of saffron. (d) Chemical structures of saffron compounds. (e) Pharmacological effects of saffron. Saffron was first documented in (a) “Collected Essentials of Species of Materia Medica” in China. (d) The chemical structure of saffron extract from top to bottom is crocetin, safranal, and crocin. Many studies have demonstrated that saffron compounds can protect the cardiovascular system by modulating oxidative stress and improving drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, they have been known to have antiatherosclerosis, antimyocardial ischemia, anti-ischemia reperfusion injury, and several other effects.

2. Review

2.1. Chemistry and Bioactivity of Saffron Compounds

Crocin is distributed in flowers, fruits, stigmas, leaves, and roots of saffron, and the content of crocin in different parts varies. For example, crocin is predominantly distributed in the stigma. Crocin is a group of hydrophilic carotenoids that are either mono- or di-glycosylpolyene-esters of crocetin in which D-glucose and/or D-gentiobiose occur as carbohydrate residues [26]. The aglycone (crocetin) of these natural products is the same (see Figure 2). Additionally, safranal is also the main active compound in saffron. The crocin family includes various glycosyl esters, of which four types have been detected in saffron. Crocin analogues, including crocin 1-4, are predominantly glycosides of trans-crocetin in saffron, among which experimental research on crocin 1 is more popular [27]. All crocin derivatives, except crocin-1, have been reported to be cis-trans isomer pairs [28]. Other than the three derived compounds (crocin, crocetin, and safranal), a number of carotenoid compounds have been identified in saffron, including minor amounts of lycopene, alpha/beta carotene, zeaxanthin, phytoene, and phytofluene, which are oil-soluble color pigments of saffron [29]. In the 1940s, a study indicated that trans-crocin underwent photoisomerization reactions and converted to cis-crocin using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [30]. The yield of the saffron stigma is extremely low. The extraction process depends on agricultural and environmental conditions in the area of the plant’s origin. The stigma accounts for 7.4% of the total flower mass; hence, to obtain a kilogram of dried stigma requires over 150,000 flowers [31]. The laborious and hand-made production of saffron and its low yield account for its reputation as the ultimate high-cost spice and an expensive traditional medicine. The quality and extraction method of saffron compounds affects the content and efficacy of crocin. At present, the common qualitative and quantitative analysis methods mainly include HPLC [32], ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry [33], gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [34], and spectroscopy [35]. Yield of saffron compounds is optimized by the solvent, temperature, light, and stirring time used in the process. Renowned for its antioxidant activity and cardioprotective effects, saffron extract is generally regarded as a water-soluble adjunct; it is soluble in diethyl ether and ethanol, as well.

2.2. Molecular Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), a group of small reactive molecules, play critical roles in the regulation of biological processes and various vital activities. ROS plays a crucial role in many CVDs, and its uncontrolled production is involved in myocardial damage. The endogenous antioxidant function as checkpoints to avoid these adverse effects of ROS, and an imbalance in the oxidant/antioxidant mechanisms leads to oxidative stress [36]. The main sources of ROS in the body are shown in Figure 3 [37–40]: (1) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) oxidase, (2) xanthine oxidase, (3) endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and (4) myeloperoxidase. These pathways may be related to the development of adverse cardiovascular changes. NADH oxidase is the most important enzyme in the formation of vascular ROS [41]. ROS induce endothelial apoptosis and the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, promote lipid peroxidation, and cause the development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is caused when ROS damage the endothelial-dependent vascular function, induce endothelial apoptosis and the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, promote the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, and induce lipid peroxidation [42]. There are four main mechanisms for the increase in ROS in ischemic heart disease. First, after myocardial ischemia and hypoxia, the energy supply of myocardial cells is insufficient, and the levels of adenosine triphosphate degradation products (xanthine and hypoxanthine) increase, thereby generating a large amount of ROS in the process of the xanthine metabolism during its transformation into uric acid [43]. Second, a large amount of catecholamine secretion and utilization increases the synthesis, and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines or directly stimulates endothelial cells, which eventually leads to the activation of the NADH/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidation system and the production of ROS in cardiomyocytes. Third, the enzyme activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain system decreases during ischemia, thereby blocking electron transfer when the energy was deficient, which changes the oxidative phosphorylation process from oxygen to H₂O by four-electron oxidation into single-electron reduction [44, 45]. Fourth, there are obstacles in ROS clearance during ischemia, causing the accumulation of a large amount of ROS in cells, which begins the cycle of damage once again.

Figure 3

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in cardiovascular diseases. NAD(P)H: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate); eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO^●: nitric oxide; O₂^●−: superoxide; HOCl: hypochlorite; SOD: superoxide dismutase activity; H₂O₂: hydrogen peroxide; ONOO⁻: peroxynitrite; OH^●: hydroxyl radicals; GSH: glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; GPx: glutathione peroxidase; Trx: thioredoxin. O₂^●− can be generated in extracellular myocardium by NAD(P)H, uncoupled eNOS, xanthine oxidase, and mitochondrial respiration chains. H₂O₂ can be spontaneously converted to OH^●− by Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ reaction and SOD. H₂O₂ can detoxify H₂O and O₂ by GSH peroxidase, Trx peroxidase, and catalase. Additionally, the uncoupling of eNOS decreases NO^● production in endothelial cells, which is further aggravated by the reduced expression and activity of eNOS. Myeloperoxidase uses hydrogen peroxide to oxidize chloride to form a strong oxidant (HOCl).

2.3. Safety of Saffron Extract in Animals and Humans

The safety of any drug used for treatment needs to be carefully evaluated to ensure that the potential side effects of treatment are clear. Although saffron has been used through the centuries as a medicinal plant, most have been performed in animals, whereas only small-scale clinical trials have been reported in recent years. Bahmani et al. [46] observed the safety of water extract of saffron and demonstrated that the oral lethal dose(LD50) is mg/kg in mice. Ramadan et al. [47] demonstrated that the oral administration of the ethanolic extract of saffron in doses up to 5 g/kg did not cause any demonstrable acute toxic effect or death in mice, whereas Mohajeri et al. [48] found that the intraperitoneal median LD50 of ethanolic extract was 3.5 g/kg in rats. The toxic doses when saffron extract is administered intraperitoneally are lower than those studies in the oral administration. It is inaccurate to directly convert animal doses to humans because it does not take into account the different physiological functions of organisms [49]. Researchers have suggested conversion methods based on the body surface area as a guide [50]. In this case, taking the study of Bahmani et al. as an example, the equivalent human dose after conversion is 20 g for a 60 kg person in oral [51].In addition, few studies have directly evaluated the safety of saffron extract. Mohamadpour et al. [52] found that in healthy volunteers, the oral administration of crocin at a dose of 20 mg/day within one month did not produce any clinically significant adverse events compared with placebo.

2.4. Effect of Saffron Extract on Cardiovascular Diseases

Cell and tissue damage caused by oxidative stress are broadly implicated in human pathophysiology, particularly CVDs [53]. To date, our increasingly complex knowledge of redox signaling in the cardiovascular system has not resulted in our ability to target it for the prevention and management of CVDs. Oxidation-reduction reactions play a crucial part in physiological signal transduction, mediating receptor-coupled regulation of ion channels and transporters, kinases, and other intracellular signaling pathways in cardiomyocytes through reversible redox modification of proteins. However, there is an unbalanced change from the incipient stage of the disease process, with oxidation-reduction overwhelming cellular protective mechanisms, such as the early pathological process of atherosclerosis [54–56]. In the case of hyperglycemia and abnormal glucose metabolism, glucose is oxidized by itself or enters the mitochondria of cells through the polyol pathway. This process induces the production of excess oxygen free radicals, which exceed the ability of endothelial cells to protect themselves and cause endothelial damage. This occurs in the majority of cardiovascular pathologies, whether the arterial wall contributing to atherosclerosis and vascular dysfunction or the myocardium from the beginning of heart failure [57, 58]. Although a massive global burden is ascribed to CVDs, progress in the field has lagged behind others such as oncology in the development and clinical translation of effective new drugs [59]. This central role of dysregulation represents an excellent opportunity for emerging clinical therapies aimed at all levels of oxidation-reduction reactions to prevent the progression and clinical consequences of the full spectrum of CVDs. It is noteworthy that crocin, a common active component in natural medicines, may play a role in modulating CVDs through oxidation-reduction reactions. The main findings of some studies that investigated the potential antioxidative stress activity of saffron in CVDs are summarized in Table 1.

2.5. Antiatherosclerosis

As the dominant cause of CVDs, oxidative stress plays a vital role in atherosclerosis. In the early stage of atherogenesis, inflammation in the innermost layer of the blood vessels leads to the release of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and chemokines [60]. Additionally, redox stress is involved in several different representations of CVDs. The overproduction of ROS leads to inflammation and is associated with atherogenesis through several key enzymes, including nitric oxide synthase (NOS), xanthine oxidase, and NADPH oxidases [61–63]. Moreover, due to its high oxidative metabolism and low antioxidant defense, which is different from other tissues, the myocardium is susceptible to oxidative damage [64, 65].

2.5.1. In Vitro Study

He et al. [17] used oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL) to incubate bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) to simulate the atherosclerotic state in vitro. After incubation with Ox-LDL, the activity of nitric oxide (NO) in culture media and that of NOS in endothelial cells were measured. Compared with the control group, crocin reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and inhibited the decrease of NO. Tang et al. [66] used crocetin as an experimental drug to intervene in the same model and obtained similar results. In BAECs, Ox-LDL treatment decreased NO production and downregulated activity and mRNA expression of eNOS, which was inhibited by cotreatment with crocetin (0.1, 1, and 10 μmol/L) in a dose-dependent manner.

2.5.2. In Vivo Study

Zheng et al. [67] studied the pharmacological effect of crocetin on atherosclerosis in rabbits. The results showed severe atherosclerosis and hypercholesterolemia in rabbits that were fed a high-fat diet. In contrast, no severe atherosclerosis was detected in rabbits with atherosclerosis treated with crocetin, which indicated that crocetin has an antiatherosclerotic effect. The underlying mechanism thereof may be reduced activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and inhibition of the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). In a follow-up study [68], supplementation with crocetin reduced the progression of atherosclerotic lesions and plasma levels of Ox-LDL. Moreover, crocetin increased the plasma total antioxidant capacity (by the ferric reducing/antioxidant power test) and superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) in rabbits, thereby inhibiting LDL oxidation and partially contributing to the reduction of atherosclerosis. He et al. [69] observed the influence of crocetin on experimental atherosclerosis in quails that were fed a hyperlipidemic diet. Crocetin was administered by oral gavage. The study found that crocetin inhibited the formation of aortic plaque observed using hematoxylin-eosin staining. Additionally, it reduced MDA and inhibited the decrease in NO levels in serum. Endothelial dysfunction strongly contributes to the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, as seen in a study [66] that formed an endothelial dysfunction model by feeding a high cholesterol diet (HCD) to rabbits and measured their endothelium-dependent relaxation (EDR) evoked by acetylcholine (Ach) and thoracic aorta. The results indicated that the EDR in HCD-only fed rabbits was notably impaired, and that the maximal relaxation induced by Ach was 54% compared with that in control rabbits who were fed a regular diet. Oral supplementation with crocetin (15 and 30 mg/kg) dose-dependently improved this impairment and restored the maximal relaxation to 68% and 80% compared with the control group. Supplementation with crocetin simultaneously increased the NO serum level, upregulated vessel activity, mRNA expression levels of eNOS, and vessel cyclic guanosine monophosphate content compared with those in rabbits fed with HCD alone.

2.5.3. Clinical Findings

A single, short-duration trial [70] investigated the bioactivity of saffron in CVD. Oral consumption of saffron (50 mg/day for six weeks) dissolved in milk was administered to 10 healthy participants and 10 with coronary artery disease, who were compared to 10 control patients consuming milk only. The sensitivity to lipoprotein oxidation was notably reduced in both intervention groups (from 76.0 to 48.8 units in patients with coronary artery disease), whereas it was not in the control patients. Recently, a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial [71] that evaluated the potential impacts of saffron aqueous extract (SAE) and crocin on some atherosclerosis-related gene expression and serum levels of Ox-LDL and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients were categorized into three groups: group 1 received crocin (30 mg/day), group 2 SAE (30 mg/day), and group 3 placebo for eight weeks. Lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 (LOX-1), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and MCP-1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were assessed. Compared with the placebo group, the expression of the LOX-1 and NF-κB genes decreased. Serum Ox-LDL levels decreased in the crocin group after treatment, and serum MCP-1 levels decreased in the crocin and SAE groups. Crocin may have beneficial effects on patients with CAD by decreasing the expression of LOX-1 and NF-κB.

2.6. Antimyocardial Ischemia

Myocardial ischemia (MI) is a pathological state that cannot support the normal functioning of the heart due to decreased blood perfusion and oxygen supply and abnormal myocardial energy metabolism. Hypertension, aortic insufficiency, and coronary artery occlusion are the risk factors of MI. Isoproterenol (ISO) is commonly used to simulate MI in animal experiments [72]. Oxidative stress is a critical factor in inducing cardiovascular dysfunction as it worsens the endothelial function and leads to insufficient blood supply, which is the possible pathological basis of MI. Under normal circumstances, the rate of ROS produced by oxidative stress reactions is in balance with its clearance rate [73, 74]. The most important ROS in blood vessels is the superoxide anion (O₂^-), and SOD can disassociate O₂^- to generate H₂O in terms of antioxidation. Generally, MDA, SOD, and NOS are used to reflect the ROS content, which is used to evaluate the degree of oxidative stress [75–77].

2.6.1. In Vivo Study

Joukar et al. [78] assessed the effects of saffron compounds on rat hearts with ISO-induced myocardial injury. The results showed that the saffron+ISO group, when compared to the ISO group, significantly increased serum levels of troponin I and reduced the glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) activity of the heart muscle. Mehdizadeh et al. [79] chose the same model to observe the antioxidant effect of the aqueous extract of saffron and safranal. Pretreatment with aqueous extract of saffron (20, 40, 80, and 160 mg/kg) or safranal (0.025, 0.050, and 0.075 mL/kg) reduced the level of MDA as a marker of lipid peroxidation in the myocardium when compared with rats treated with ISO alone. Goyal et al. [80] investigated the effects of crocin on ISO-induced cardiotoxicity with reference to hemodynamic, antioxidant, histopathological, and ultrastructural parameters. Rats were administered crocin (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg/day) or a vehicle orally for 21 d with ISO (85 mg/kg subcutaneously at 24 h intervals) on the twentieth and twenty-first days. Compared with the ISO group, a notable improvement in the activities of SOD, catalase, and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels with a reduction in the MDA content was observed. Crocin (20 mg/kg/day) significantly inhibited oxidant derangements. Light microscopy and ultrastructural analyses were used to visualize changes in the crocin group, which were improved myocardial necrosis and edema. It was demonstrated that crocin can prevent myocardial infarction induced by ISO. Another study [81] showed that crocetin ester (CE) protected against ISO-induced acute MI through the Rho/ROCK/NF-κB pathway. CE (25 and 50 mg/kg) decreased the MDA content and SOD activity. Additionally, CE ameliorated the cardiac expression of Zn-superoxide dismutase, MDA5, Rho, ROCK, p-IκB, and p-NF-κBp65 in ISO-induced rats. These results indicated that saffron could maintain the redox state of cells by regulating oxidative stress, which has a cardioprotective effect in ISO-induced cardiotoxicity. Jin et al. [82] observed the effects of crocin on ISO-induced cardiotoxicity in mice by intraperitoneal injection of crocin (100 and 200 mg/kg/day for 14 d). Administration of crocin improved the morphology of the heart and caused a significant reduction in oxidative stress levels (SOD, catalase, and GSH) in ISO-induced cardiotoxicity in mice. Additionally, crocin treatment suppressed the expression of NF-κB and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). The protective effects of crocin might be achieved by regulating the TLR4/NF-κ B signal transduction pathway. Xue et al. [83] found that safranal played a cardioprotective role in ISO-induced cardiotoxicity in mice. Safranal (0.025 and 0.075 mL/kg) reduced the activity of serum MDA and intracellular calcium concentration and increased the activity of serum SOD. This was a step further than previous studies; saffron extract increased the activity of SOD and intracellular calcium concentration.

2.7. Anti-Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury leads to disorders of the cardiac function, tissue damage, and metabolic changes. Hearts that experience IR and coronary artery insufficiency exhibit myocardial damage and abnormal ECG conduction, malignant arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest [84]. ROS and lipid peroxidation are the causes of myocardial IR injury. The effects of crocin and crocetin on myocardial IR are similar in that they play a role in improving myocardial energy metabolism through an antioxidant effect. Previous studies [85, 86] suggested that there is a close relationship between myocardial IR injury and the production of oxygen free radicals. In patients with MI, the number of intracellular free radical scavengers is reduced, resulting in a large number of free radicals that cannot be removed in time, which plays a role in promoting cell damage and accelerating cell death.

2.7.1. In Vitro Study

Dianat et al. [87] studied the effects of crocin antioxidant pretreatment on hemodynamics and infarct size against IR in isolated rat hearts. Animals were divided into a control group, an ischemia-reperfusion control group, and three treatment groups: crocin (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), vitamin E (100 mg/kg), and a combination (crocin 40 mg/kg with vitamin E 100 mg/kg). Crocin significantly improved cardiac dysfunction and reduced infarct size in rat hearts. However, the combination of crocin (40 mg/kg) and vitamin E (100 mg/kg) had a significant improvement on hemodynamic parameters and infarct size, as well as an increase in SOD and catalase enzyme activities, and a decrease in MDA was noticed. Therefore, the protective role of crocin may be due to the stability or reinforcement of antioxidant systems [88], and crocin could be useful for the treatment or prevention of cardiac dysfunction.

2.7.2. In Vivo Study

Bharti et al. [89] investigated safranal-induced myocardial protection against IR injury in rats by promoting antioxidant effects. Safranal (0.1-0.5 mL/kg/day, i.p.) dose-dependently enhanced phosphorylation of Akt/GSK-3β/eNOS and suppressed the IKK-β/NF-κB protein expression in IR-challenged myocardium. Moreover, safranal normalized GSHPx, LDH, and CK-MB in IR-injured myocardium in a dose-dependent manner. Efentakis et al. [90] found that SAE improved myocardial IR injury in wild-type and ApoE (-/-) mice via the Nrf2 pathway. This in vivo study established three interventions: water for injection, SAE at a dose of 60 mg/kg/day, SAE as described above, and wortmannin at a dose of 60 μg/kg bolus 15 min before reperfusion. SAE reduced the infarct size by the ratio of the ischemic area to the risk area (I/R%) in wild-type and ApoE (-/-) mice. The administration of wortmannin resulted in partial inhibition of the infarct size limitation efficacy of saffron (in wild-type and ApoE (-/-) mice). Mice receiving SAE showed increased levels of eNOS, p-Akt, p-ERK1/2, p-44/p-42, and p-GSK3β-Ser9 and reduced inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Saffron limits myocardial infarction in wild-type and ApoE(-/-) mice in a multifaceted manner, including activation of the Akt/eNOS/ERK1/2/GSK3-β pathway. A study by Jahanbakhsh et al. [91] showed that crocin had a protective effect on myocardial IR-induced arrhythmia in rats. Crocin (20 mg/kg, i.p.) protected against IR injury by increasing the activity of peroxidase, SOD, and GSH, and reducing the content of MDA. Yan et al. [92] showed that crocetin (50 mg/kg, i.p.) improved myocardial injury induced by hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in anesthetized rats. The mechanism of action is as follows: crocetin maintained the activity of total SOD, reduced the superoxide anion or free radical, weakened the activity of iNOS, and increased the production of NO. Wang et al. [93] investigated the mechanism of crocetin in repairing myocardial injury after IR in vivo. Wistar rats were randomly divided into the sham operation, IR, and crocetin groups and administered crocetin (50 mg/kg, i.g. for 7 d) or sodium carboxymethylcellulose prior to the operation. The results affirmed that pretreatment with crocetin reduced myocardial injury and oxidative stress. In this study, it was observed that IR in rats results in the upregulation of MDA and downregulation of SOD. Additionally, the administration of crocetin increased the expression of eNOS and NO, indicating that crocetin could protect myocardial cells by inhibiting ROS production and blocking inflammatory reactions.

2.8. Improvement in Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Drug cardiotoxicity refers to the side effects of drugs that cause myocardial damage, arrhythmia, abnormal cardiac systolic or diastolic function, and cardiac hypertrophy [94, 95]. The decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction is also considered a cardiotoxic event [96]. Cardiovascular toxicity due to therapeutic drug use has the highest incidence and severity of adverse drug reactions in late-stage clinical development [97, 98]. Based on previous reports [99–102], the role of saffron in preventing these drug-induced cardiotoxic events may be attributed to stability or increase in the capacity of antioxidant systems.

Cardiotoxicity appears to be a major cause of drug withdrawal from the pharmaceutical market [103, 104]. Several chemotherapeutic compounds, particularly antitumor drugs, have been noted for their propensity to induce dangerous cardiac-specific side effects. Cardiac toxicity has a serious impact on the quality of life of cancer patients. Moreover, the development of toxicity may lead to the adjustment or cessation of antitumor treatment, affecting the survival of patients [105]. Common chemotherapy drugs [106–108] that cause cardiotoxicity include anthracyclines, alkylating agents, antimetabolic drugs, platinum, anticell microtubule agents, and targeted therapy drugs, predominantly anthracycline-derived [109]. The main mechanism of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is the production of ROS mediated by iron and the promotion of oxidative stress in the myocardium [110, 111]. Anthracyclines chelate iron ions and trigger the generation of oxygen free radicals, particularly hydroxyl radicals, which lead to lipid peroxidation of myocardial cell membranes and damage of mitochondrial DNA [112]. Compared with other cells, anthracyclines are more likely to be present in cardiomyocytes due to their myocardial affinity, the lack of catalase in the myocardium, and its weak antioxidant activity [113]. Additionally, cardiomyocytes are rich in mitochondria, which is another source of ROS; anthracycline drugs have a high affinity for cardiolipin, which can enter mitochondria and bind cardiolipin, thereby inhibiting the respiratory chain and causing cardiac damage [114–116]. Clinical research and experimental studies [117–119] show that the majority of cardiotoxicity induced by anthracycline drugs are progressive and irreversible; in particular, their first use can easily cause heart injury. Therefore, early monitoring and active prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity are highly important [120].

2.8.1. In Vitro Study

Chahine et al. [121, 122] used the model of an isolated rabbit heart perfused in retrograde. In one set of experiments, SOD was generated by electrolysis of the perfused heart solution (3 mmol/L for 30 min) in the presence and absence of saffron extract at the optimal dose (10 μg/mL). In another set, researchers perfused the heart with an anthracycline, that is 3 mmol/L doxorubicin (DOX) in the presence and absence of 10 μg/ml saffron extract. SOD generated by DOX significantly affected the cardiovascular function. Saffrons perfused during electrolysis help trap SOD and significantly improve the myocardial function. Another study [123] found that the administration of saffron extract during reperfusion significantly reduced oxidative myocardial damage, although it was less effective when administered before ischemia was induced. Upon confirming the protective effects of the saffron extract on DOX-induced oxidative cytotoxicity in isolated rabbit hearts, this effect was investigated in H9c2 cardiomyocytes against IR and DOX combined toxicity. H9c2 cells were treated with simulated IR and DOX in the presence or absence of saffron extract (10 μg/mL). The data indicated that treatment with saffron extract attenuated DOX-induced toxicity by increasing cell viability and attenuating LDH activity. Thus, the saffron extract had a significant protective effect against DOX-induced myocardial cell death. Chu [124] demonstrated that crocin prevented doxorubicin-induced toxicity through antioxidant stress in H9c2 cells. H9c2 cardiomyoblasts were incubated with DOX (2.0 μM) after treatment with crocin (40,80 μM for 120 min) or were pretreated with crocin (50 μM for 120 min) before being administered DOX. The results revealed that the DOX administration elevated ROS levels (SOD, catalase, and GSH) in contrast with the no treatment group, whereas crocin pretreatment notably restrained ROS expression in DOX-treated H9c2 cells.

2.8.2. In Vivo Study

Razavi et al. [99, 125] used diazinon to induce cardiac injury in rats. Administration of crocin decreased MDA in the myocardium and hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), which showed that crocin had an antioxidative stress effect, thus playing a pharmacological role in the treatment of CVDs. HIF-1 is the master regulator of the translational response, which regulates cellular responses to hypoxia [126]. It is a heterodimeric transcription factor including HIF-1α and hypoxia inducible factor-1β subunits [127, 128]. The alpha subunit is sensitive to oxygen [129]. HIF-1α may have the opposite reaction with ROS at different stages. Under the hypoxia condition, HIF-1α could be activated by ROS through a variety of signal pathways to protect cells from hypoxia. At this point, the hydroxylation of HIF-1α is blocked, which leads to the stabilization of HIF-1 and protects cells from hypoxia [130]. Under normoxic conditions, the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway could degrade HIF-1α via tumor suppressor protein von Hippel Lindau (VHL). VHL is one of the components of ubiquitin in E3 ligase. This process is triggered by the hydroxylation of specific prolyl residues at the HIF-α subunits through VHL [131]. This study found that diazinon increased the HIF-1α protein level. The increase of HIF-1α may be related to the compensation mechanism after diazinon-induced oxidative stress. Crocin alleviated this condition caused by diazinon. This is consistent with other studies: under certain conditions, many antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid and catalase, reduce the HIF-1 expression via reduction of ROS [132]. Salem et al. [101] showed that crocin reduced the level of lipid peroxidation and regulated the activity of SOD and peroxidase, indicating that crocin had a protective effect on zearalenone-induced cardiotoxicity. Razmaraii [133] conducted a study to assess the protective effect of crocin on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. The rats were divided into four groups: control, DOX (2 mg/kg/48 h for 12 d), and crocin groups that received DOX as in DOX group and crocin (20 and 40 mg/kg/24 h for 20 d) starting 4 d prior to the first DOX injection. DOX treatment resulted in cardiotoxicity manifested by decreased left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures, ejection fraction, fractional shortening, and contractility index, as compared to those of the control group. Additionally, histopathological analysis of the heart demonstrated adverse structural changes in myocardial cells following the DOX administration. Moreover, crocin treatment significantly improved DOX-induced heart damage, structural changes in the myocardium, and ventricular function. Additionally, crocin did not affect the in vitro antitumor activity of DOX. However, the limitation of the study was that crocin had not demonstrated to improve cardiotoxicity by regulating antioxidant stress. Elsherbiny [134] evaluated that crocin protected against DOX-induced myocardial toxicity in rats. Rats received DOX (3.5 mg/kg twice weekly) for three weeks with and without daily administration of crocin (10 and 20 mg/kg, orally) for three weeks. There was a significant increase in MDA levels associated with the reduced SOD activity in myocardial homogenates in DOX-administered rats compared to those of the control group. Furthermore, there was a significant dose-dependent decrease in the level of MDA and restoration of the SOD activity in myocardial homogenates of rats treated with crocin (10 and 20 mg/kg) compared to those in the DOX group. Chu [124] identified the cardioprotective action of crocin against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Crocin (50 and 100 mg/kg/d, i.p. for 4 d) was administered to rats, and DOX (10 mg/kg/day, i.p.) administered on the fourth day. Crocin exerted positive effects on DOX-induced ROS production and changes in oxidative stress biomarkers. Crocin significantly decreased intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration and increased mitochondrial membrane potentiation in H9c2 cells. Crocin notably inhibited DOX-mediated elevated expression of TLR2 and NF-κB in the ventricular tissue. These cardioprotective effects might be closely related to the TLR2/NF-κB pathway.

3. Conclusions

Research on the use of saffron extract in CVDs has made great progress in recent years (see Figure 4). Based on the available evidence that the active components of saffron may play great role by regulating antioxidation on atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia, ischemia reperfusion injury, and drug-induced cardiotoxicity, saffron extract can inhibit the occurrence of oxidative stress by protecting vascular endothelial and myocardial cells and normalizing the hypersensitive oxidative stress. Currently, many aspects of saffron and its bioactivity remain unknown. First, many potential mechanisms of antioxidative stress and the pharmacological effects of saffron are not clearly elucidated. The majority of the existing research on the pharmacological effects of saffron extract are relatively isolated and require more in-depth and extensive investigations. Second, the majority of the research reports on the pharmacological effects of saffron concentrate on the animal and cell level, while rarely assessing its clinical applications. Hence, it is necessary to carry out such studies to verify the potential cardioprotective efficacy of saffron extract in patients with CVDs. As a traditional medicine, saffron has been widely used since many ages in clinical practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study the effective components of saffron, such as crocin, crocetin, and safranal. Further, elucidation of the mechanisms of active constituents in saffron, its pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and the medicinal value of crocin are required for their broader application.

Figure 4

Pharmacological mechanism of crocin in the evolution of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).ROS: reactive oxygen species; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B; Ox-LDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein; LOX-1: lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1; O₂^●−: superoxide; SOD: superoxide dismutase activity; MDA: malondialdehyde; eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NO: nitric oxide; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; GSH: glutathione; IKK-β: inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase beta; Akt: protein kinase B; ERK 1/2: extracellular regulated protein kinases 1/2; GSK3-β: glycogen synthase kinase-3beta; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; HIF-1α: hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha; TLR-2: toll-like receptor 2; Rho: Ras homolog; ROCK: Rho-associated coiled-coil forming protein kinase; TLR-4: toll-like receptor 4. (a) During the evolution of atherosclerotic plaques, the main role of crocin is to reduce the oxidation of LDL and inhibit the various oxidative stress responses that ox-LDL triggers. (b) Saffron in MI regulates superoxide reaction by increasing SOD, GSH, and catalase, thereby preventing excessive myocardial injury. Saffron may regulate oxidative stress through the NF-κ B signaling. (c) In the progress of myocardial IR, saffron predominantly reduces the damage caused by oxidative stress by inhibiting the activation of the ROS system. (d) Saffron resists oxidative stress by regulating ROS-related enzymes and through HIF-α, to improve drug-induced cardiotoxicity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Xin Su, Chao Yuan, Li Wang, Runqi Chen, and Xiangying Li contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos. 2018YFC1704901 and 2018YFC1704900).

References

M. Shafiee, S. Arekhi, A. Omranzadeh, and A. Sahebkar, “Saffron in the treatment of depression, anxiety and other mental disorders: cqurrent evidence and potential mechanisms of action,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 227, pp. 330–337, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Pitsikas, “Constituents of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) as potential candidates for the treatment of anxiety disorders and schizophrenia,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 303, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Gresta, G. M. Lombardo, L. Siracusa, and G. Ruberto, “Saffron, an alternative crop for sustainable agricultural systems. A review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 95–112, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Aghaei, S. M. Jafari, and D. Dehnad, “Effect of different drying methods on the physicochemical properties and bioactive components of saffron powder,” Plant foods for human nutrition, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Yue, R. Wang, X. Ma et al., “Full-length transcriptome sequencing provides insights into the evolution of apocarotenoid biosynthesis in Crocus sativus,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 18, pp. 774–783, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mollazadeh, S. A. Emami, and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Razi's Al-Hawi and saffron (Crocus sativus): a review,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1153–1166, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Rahaiee, S. Moini, M. Hashemi, and S. A. Shojaosadati, “Evaluation of antioxidant activities of bioactive compounds and various extracts obtained from saffron (Crocus sativus L.): a review,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1881–1888, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Inoue, Y. Shimizu, R. Masui et al., “Effects of saffron and its constituents, crocin-1, crocin-2, and crocetin on α-synuclein fibrils,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 274–279, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, F. Ding, W. Shao, G. Wang, and G. Wang, “Regulated preparation of crocin-1 or crocin-2 triggered by the cosolvent DMSO using Bs-GT/at-SuSy one-pot reaction,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 67, no. 45, pp. 12496–12501, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Ahrazem, A. Rubio-Moraga, M. L. Jimeno, and L. Gómez-Gómez, “Structural characterization of highly glucosylated crocins and regulation of their biosynthesis during flower development in Crocus,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, p. 971, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Chalatsa, D. A. Arvanitis, N. S. Koulakiotis et al., “The compounds -crocin 4 and -crocetin modulate the amyloidogenic pathway and tau misprocessing in Alzheimer disease neuronal cell culture models,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 249, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Kumar, Z. A. Bhat, D. Kumar, N. A. Khan, I. A. Chashoo, and M. Y. Shah, “Pharmacological profile of Crocus sativus-a comprehesive review,” Pharmacology, vol. 3, pp. 799–811, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Boussabbeh, A. Prola, I. Ben Salem et al., “Crocin and quercetin prevent PAT-induced apoptosis in mammalian cells: involvement of ROS-mediated ER stress pathway,” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1851–1858, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. el-Beshbishy, M. H. Hassan, H. A. A. Aly, A. S. Doghish, and A. A. A. Alghaithy, “Crocin "saffron" protects against beryllium chloride toxicity in rats through diminution of oxidative stress and enhancing gene expression of antioxidant enzymes,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 83, pp. 47–54, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Samaha, E. Said, and H. A. Salem, “A comparative study of the role of crocin and sitagliptin in attenuation of STZ-induced diabetes mellitus and the associated inflammatory and apoptotic changes in pancreatic β-islets,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 72, p. 103238, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Baradaran Rahim, M. T. Khammar, H. Rakhshandeh, A. Hosseini, V. R. Askari, and V. R. Askari, “Crocin protects cardiomyocytes against LPS-Induced inflammation,” Pharmacological reports, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1228–1234, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. He, Z. Y. Qian, F. T. Tang, G. L. Xu, L. Sheng, and L. Sheng, “Effect of crocin on experimental atherosclerosis in quails and its mechanisms,” Life Sciences, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 907–921, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yosri, W. F. Elkashef, E. Said, and N. M. Gameil, “Crocin modulates IL-4/IL-13 signaling and ameliorates experimentally induced allergic airway asthma in a murine model,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 50, pp. 305–312, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xi, Z. Qian, X. Shen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Crocetin prevents dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance in rats,” Planta Medica, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 917–922, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Purushothuman, C. Nandasena, C. L. Peoples et al., “Saffron pre-treatment offers neuroprotection to Nigral and retinal dopaminergic cells of MPTP-treated mice,” Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Hosseinzadeh, V. Motamedshariaty, and F. Hadizadeh, “Antidepressant effect of kaempferol, a constituent of saffron (Crocus sativus) petal, in mice and rats,” Pharmacology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1003–1003, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, Q. Xu, J. Shang, L. Lu, and G. Chen, “Crocin inhibits the migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of gastric cancer cells via miR-320/KLF5/HIF-1α signaling,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 234, no. 10, pp. 17876–17885, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Cui, S. Miao, T. Esworthy et al., “3D bioprinting for cardiovascular regeneration and pharmacology,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 132, pp. 252–269, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Go, D. Mozaffarian, V. L. Roger et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 129, no. 3, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Simon-Yarza, I. Bataille, and D. Letourneur, “Cardiovascular bio-engineering: current state of the art,” Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 180–193, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Li and T. Wu, “Constituents of the stigmas of Crocussativusand their tyrosinase inhibitory activity,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1452–1456, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Alavizadeh and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Bioactivity assessment and toxicity of crocin: A comprehensive review,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 64, pp. 65–80, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. K. Dhingra, T. R. Seshadri, and S. K. Mukerjee, “Minor carotenoid glycosides from saffron (Crocus sativus),” Indian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 339–341, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Pfander and H. Schurtenberger, “Biosynthesis of C₂₀-carotenoids in Crocus sativus,” Phytochemistry, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1039–1042, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Amanpour, H. Kelebek, and S. Selli, GLC/HPLC Methods for Saffron (Crocus sativus L.), Springer, Cham, 2019.
J. Serrano-Díaz, A. M. Sánchez, M. Martínez-Tomé, P. Winterhalter, and G. L. Alonso, “Flavonoid determination in the quality control of floral bioresidues from Crocus sativus L,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 14, pp. 3125–3133, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. García-Rodríguez, H. López-Córcoles, G. L. Alonso, C. S. Pappas, M. G. Polissiou, and P. A. Tarantilis, “Comparative evaluation of an ISO 3632 method and an HPLC-DAD method for safranal quantity determination in saffron,” Food Chemistry, vol. 221, pp. 838–843, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. D'Archivio and M. A. Maggi, “Geographical identification of saffron ( Crocus sativus L.) by linear discriminant analysis applied to the UV -visible spectra of aqueous extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 219, pp. 408–413, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sereshti, R. Heidari, and S. Samadi, “Determination of volatile components of saffron by optimised ultrasound- assisted extraction in tandem with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 143, pp. 499–505, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, Q. Shao, Z. Lu, C. Duan, H. Yi, and L. Su, “Rapid determination of crocins in saffron by near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometric techniques,” Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, vol. 190, pp. 283–289, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Kattoor, N. V. K. Pothineni, D. Palagiri, and J. L. Mehta, “Oxidative stress in atherosclerosis,” Current atherosclerosis reports, vol. 19, no. 11, p. ???, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yang, Y. Li, Y. Li et al., “Oxidative stress-mediated atherosclerosis: mechanisms and therapies,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 8, p. 600, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Brieger, S. Schiavone, F. J. Miller, and K. H. Krause, “Reactive oxygen species: from health to disease,” Swiss Medical Weekly, vol. 142, p. w13659, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Finkel, “Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species,” The Journal of cell biology, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Bayir, “Reactive oxygen species,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, Supplement, pp. S498–S501, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. T. Lee, C.-C. Lin, C.-H. Wang, W. J. Cherng, J. S. Wang, and C. M. Yang, “ATP stimulates PGE₂/cyclin D1-dependent VSMCs proliferation via STAT3 activation: Role of PKCs-dependent NADPH oxidase/ROS generation,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 954–964, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Sack, F. Y. Fyhrquist, O. J. Saijonmaa, J. C. Kovacic, and J. C. Kovacic, “Basic biology of oxidative stress and the cardiovascular system: part 1 of a 3-part series,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 196–211, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, P. Murugesan, K. Huang, and H. Cai, “NADPH oxidases and oxidase crosstalk in cardiovascular diseases: novel therapeutic targets,” Nature Reviews. Cardiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 170–194, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. S. Dhalla, R. M. Temsah, and T. Netticadan, “Role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 655–673, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yang, Y. Chen, and J. Shi, “Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based Nanomedicine,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 4881–4985, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bahmani, M. Rafieian, A. Baradaran, M. Rafieian-Kopaei, and M. Rafieian-Kopaei, “Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity evaluation of Crocus sativus stigmas in neonates of nursing mice,” Journal of nephropathology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ramadan, G. Soliman, S. S. Mahmoud, R. F. Abdel-Rahman, and R. F. Abdel-Rahman, “Evaluation of the safety and antioxidant activities of Crocus sativus and Propolis ethanolic extracts,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mohajeri, G. Mousavi, M. Mesgari, Y. Doustar, and M. H. K. Nouri, “Subacute toxicity of Crocus Sativus L. (saffron) stigma Ethanolic extract in rats,” American Journal of Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 189–193, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Reagan-Shaw, M. Nihal, and N. Ahmad, “Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 659–661, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
V. G. Desai, T. Lee, C. L. Moland et al., “Effect of short-term exposure to zidovudine (AZT) on the expression of mitochondria-related genes in skeletal muscle of neonatal mice,” Mitochondrion, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Lymperopoulou and F. N. Lamari, “Saffron safety in humans: lessons from the animal and clinical studies,” Medicinal & Aromatic Plants, vol. 4, no. 5, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. H. Mohamadpour, Z. Ayati, M.-R. Parizadeh, O. Rajbai, and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Safety evaluation of Crocin (a constituent of saffron) tablets in healthy volunteers,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Ruskovska, V. Maksimova, and D. Milenkovic, “Polyphenols in human nutrition: from thein vitroantioxidant capacity to the beneficial effects on cardiometabolic health and related inter-individual variability - an overview and perspective,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 241–254, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tousoulis, T. Psaltopoulou, E. Androulakis et al., “Oxidative stress and early atherosclerosis: novel antioxidant treatment,” Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xi, M. Akishita, K. Nagai et al., “Potent free radical scavenger, edaravone, suppresses oxidative stress-induced endothelial damage and early atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 281–289, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Santolini, S. A. Wootton, A. A. Jackson, and M. Feelisch, “The redox architecture of physiological function,” Current Opinion in Physiology, vol. 9, pp. 34–47, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Legchenko, P. Chouvarine, P. Borchert et al., “PPARγ agonist pioglitazone reverses pulmonary hypertension and prevents right heart failure via fatty acid oxidation,” Science translational medicine, vol. 10, no. 438, p. eaao0303, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Rosca, B. Tandler, and C. L. Hoppel, “Mitochondria in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 55, pp. 31–41, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Bubb, G. R. Drummond, and G. A. Figtree, “New opportunities for targeting redox dysregulation in cardiovascular disease,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 532–544, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ghaffari and N. Roshanravan, “Saffron; an updated review on biological properties with special focus on cardiovascular effects,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 109, pp. 21–27, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Marchio, S. Guerra-Ojeda, J. M. Vila, M. Aldasoro, V. M. Victor, and M. D. Mauricio, “Targeting early atherosclerosis: a focus on oxidative stress and inflammation,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 8563845, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
U. Förstermann, N. Xia, and H. Li, “Roles of vascular oxidative stress and nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 713–735, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lozhkin, A. E. Vendrov, H. Pan, S. A. Wickline, N. R. Madamanchi, and M. S. Runge, “NADPH oxidase 4 regulates vascular inflammation in aging and atherosclerosis,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 102, pp. 10–21, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Saito, A. Kuroda, H. Tanaka, A. Yoshida, H. Yoshida, and V. J. Ferrans, “Differential sensitivity of rat cardiac sarcolemma and mitochondria to damage induced by lipid peroxidation,” Journal of Electron Microscopy, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 305–309, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Knight-Lozano, C. G. Young, D. L. Burow et al., “Cigarette smoke exposure and hypercholesterolemia increase mitochondrial damage in cardiovascular tissues,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 849–854, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. T. Tang, Z. Y. Qian, P. Q. Liu et al., “Crocetin improves endothelium-dependent relaxation of thoracic aorta in hypercholesterolemic rabbit by increasing eNOS activity,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 558–565, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zheng, Z. Qian, F. Tang, and L. Sheng, “Suppression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression by crocetin contributes to attenuation of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1192–1199, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zheng, Z. Qian, L. Sheng, and N. Wen, “Crocetin attenuates atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic rabbits through inhibition of LDL oxidation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-Y. He, Z.-Y. Qian, N. Wen, F. T. Tang, G. L. Xu, and C. H. Zhou, “Influence of crocetin on experimental atherosclerosis in hyperlipidamic-diet quails,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 554, no. 2-3, pp. 191–195, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Verma and A. Bordia, “Antioxidant property of saffron in man,” Indian Journal of Medical ences, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 205–207, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Abedimanesh, B. Motlagh, S. Abedimanesh, S. Z. Bathaie, A. Separham, and A. Ostadrahimi, “Effects of crocin and saffron aqueous extract on gene expression ofSIRT1,AMPK,LOX1,NF‐κB, andMCP‐1in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Phytotherapy research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1114–1122, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. W. Wong, P. V. Thanikachalam, and S. Ramamurthy, “Molecular understanding of the protective role of natural products on isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction: A review,” Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, vol. 94, pp. 1145–1166, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cadenas, “ROS and redox signaling in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 117, pp. 76–89, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wu, G. Chang, L. Gao et al., “Trimetazidine protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting excessive autophagy,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 791–806, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Enli, M. Turk, R. Akbay et al., “Oxidative stress parameters in patients with slow coronary flow,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Erdoğan, A. Oner, A. Aydin, A. Işimer, G. Demircin, and M. Bülbül, “Effect of vitamin E treatment on the oxidative damage occurring in Henoch-Schönlein purpura,” Acta paediatrica, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 546–550, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Taner, S. Aydın, M. Bacanlı et al., “Modulating effects of pycnogenol® on oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by sepsis in rats,” Phytother Res, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1692–1700, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Joukar, H. Najafipour, M. Khaksari et al., “The effect of saffron consumption on biochemical and histopathological heart indices of rats with myocardial infarction,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mehdizadeh, M.-R. Parizadeh, A.-R. Khooei, S. Mehri, and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Cardioprotective effect of saffron extract and safranal in isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction in wistar rats,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. N. Goyal, S. Arora, A. K. Sharma et al., “Preventive effect of crocin of Crocus sativus on hemodynamic, biochemical, histopathological and ultrastuctural alterations in isoproterenol-induced cardiotoxicity in rats,” Phytomedicine, vol. 17, no. 3-4, pp. 227–232, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Huang, C. Nan, H. Wang et al., “Crocetin ester improves myocardial ischemia via Rho/ROCK/NF-κB pathway,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 38, pp. 186–193, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jin, Y. Zhang, Y. Xue et al., “Crocin attenuates isoprenaline-induced myocardial fibrosis by targeting TLR4/NF-κB signaling: connecting oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 393, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xue, W. Jin, Y. Xue et al., “Safranal, an active constituent of saffron, ameliorates myocardial ischemia via reduction of oxidative stress and regulation of Ca²⁺ homeostasis,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 156–164, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Min, X. J. Jia, Q. Gao et al., “Remote ischemic post-conditioning protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting the Rho-kinase signaling pathway,” Experimental and therapeutic medicine, vol. 19, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Bugger and K. Pfeil, “Mitochondrial ROS in myocardial ischemia reperfusion and remodeling,” Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease, vol. 1866, no. 7, p. 165768, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Guler, M. A. Sahin, O. Yucel et al., “Proanthocyanidin prevents myocardial ischemic injury in adult rats,” Medical science monitor, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. BR326–BR331, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dianat, M. Esmaeilizadeh, M. Badavi, A. Samarbafzadeh, and B. Naghizadeh, “Protective effects of crocin on hemodynamic parameters and infarct size in comparison with vitamin E after ischemia reperfusion in isolated rat hearts,” Planta Medica, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 393–398, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dianat, M. Esmaeilizadeh, M. Badavi, A. R. Samarbaf-zadeh, and B. Naghizadeh, “Protective effects of crocin on ischemia-reperfusion induced oxidative stress in comparison with vitamin E in isolated rat hearts,” Jundishapur journal of natural pharmaceutical products, vol. 9, no. 2, article e17187, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Bharti, M. Golechha, S. Kumari, K. M. Siddiqui, and D. S. Arya, “Akt/GSK-3β/eNOS phosphorylation arbitrates safranal-induced myocardial protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 719–727, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Efentakis, A. Rizakou, E. Christodoulou et al., “Saffron (Crocus sativus) intake provides nutritional preconditioning against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in Wild Type and ApoE^(−/−) mice: Involvement of Nrf2 activation,” Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 919–929, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Jahanbakhsh, B. Rasoulian, M. Jafari et al., “Protective effect of crocin against reperfusion-induced cardiac arrhythmias in anaesthetized rats,” EXCLI Journal, vol. 11, pp. 20–29, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Yan, Z. Qian, L. Sheng et al., “Effect of crocetin on blood pressure restoration and synthesis of inflammatory mediators in heart after hemorrhagic shock in anesthetized rats,” Shock, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 83–87, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, J. Sun, C. Liu, and C. Fang, “Protective effects of crocetin pretreatment on myocardial injury in an ischemia/reperfusion rat model,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 741, pp. 290–296, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. V. Varga, P. Ferdinandy, L. Liaudet, and P. Pacher, “Drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiotoxicity,” American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 309, no. 9, pp. H1453–H1467, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Babiker, A. McBride, M. Newton et al., “Cardiotoxic effects of chemotherapy: a review of both cytotoxic and molecular targeted oncology therapies and their effect on the cardiovascular system,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 126, pp. 186–200, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Avila, S. M. Ayub-Ferreira, M. R. de Barros Wanderley et al., “Carvedilol for prevention of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity: the CECCY trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 71, no. 20, pp. 2281–2290, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Savoji, M. H. Mohammadi, N. Rafatian et al., “Cardiovascular disease models: a game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening,” Biomaterials, vol. 198, pp. 3–26, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Potter and T. H. Marwick, “Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography: the case for routinely adding global longitudinal strain to ejection fraction,” JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 260–274, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Razavi, H. Hosseinzadeh, M. Imenshahidi, M. Malekian, M. Ramezani, and K. Abnous, “Evaluation of protein ubiquitylation in heart tissue of rats exposed to diazinon (an organophosphate insecticide) and crocin (an active saffron ingredient): role of HIF-1α,” Drug research, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 561–566, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Boussabbeh, I. Ben Salem, F. Neffati, M. F. Najjar, H. Bacha, and S. Abid-Essefi, “Crocin prevents patulin-induced acute toxicity in cardiac tissues via the regulation of oxidative damage and apoptosis,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 479–488, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. B. Salem, M. Boussabbeh, F. Neffati, M. F. Najjar, S. Abid-Essefi, and H. Bacha, “Zearalenone-induced changes in biochemical parameters, oxidative stress and apoptosis in cardiac tissue,” Human & Experimental Toxicology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 623–634, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Razavi, H. Hosseinzadeh, K. Abnous, V. S. Motamedshariaty, and M. Imenshahidi, “Crocin restores hypotensive effect of subchronic administration of diazinon in rats,” Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Singh, Y. K. Loke, and C. D. Furberg, “Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with Rosiglitazone,” JAMA, vol. 298, no. 10, pp. 1189–1195, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ferdinandy, I. Baczkó, P. Bencsik et al., “Definition of hidden drug cardiotoxicity: paradigm change in cardiac safety testing and its clinical implications,” European Heart Journal, vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 1771–1777, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. E. Levis, P. F. Binkley, and C. L. Shapiro, “Cardiotoxic effects of anthracycline-based therapy: what is the evidence and what are the potential harms?” The Lancet. Oncology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. e445–e456, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Madeddu, M. Deidda, A. Piras et al., “Pathophysiology of cardiotoxicity induced by nonanthracycline chemotherapy,” Journal of cardiovascular medicine, vol. 17, Supplement 1, pp. e12–e18, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Alexandre, J. J. Moslehi, K. R. Bersell, C. Funck-Brentano, D. M. Roden, and J.-E. Salem, “Anticancer drug-induced cardiac rhythm disorders: Current knowledge and basic underlying mechanisms,” Pharmacology & therapeutics, vol. 189, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Swain, M. S. Ewer, G. Viale et al., “Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and standard anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive localized breast cancer (BERENICE): a phase II, open-label, multicenter, multinational cardiac safety study,” Annals of oncology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 646–653, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Suter and M. S. Ewer, “Cancer drugs and the heart: importance and management,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 1102–1111, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Lyu, J. E. Kerrigan, C.-P. Lin et al., “Topoisomerase IIβ–Mediated DNA double-strand breaks: implications in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity and prevention by dexrazoxane,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 18, pp. 8839–8846, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Šimůnek, M. Štěrba, O. Popelová, M. Adamcová, R. Hrdina, and V. Geršl, “Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: overview of studies examining the roles of oxidative stress and free cellular iron,” Pharmacological reports, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 154–171, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Hershko, A. Pinson, and G. Link, “Prevention of anthracycline cardiotoxicity by iron chelation,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. J. Kang, X. Sun, Y. Chen, and Z. Zhou, “Inhibition of doxorubicin chronic toxicity in catalase-overexpressing transgenic mouse hearts,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Marques-Aleixo, E. Santos-Alves, P. J. Oliveira, P. I. Moreira, J. Magalhães, and A. Ascensão, “The beneficial role of exercise in mitigating doxorubicin-induced Mitochondrionopathy,” Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1869, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lebrecht, B. Setzer, U.-P. Ketelsen, J.̈. Haberstroh, and U. A. Walker, “Time-dependent and tissue-specific accumulation of mtDNA and respiratory chain defects in chronic doxorubicin cardiomyopathy,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 19, pp. 2423–2429, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lebrecht, A. Kokkori, U.-P. Ketelsen, B. Setzer, and U. A. Walker, “Tissue-specific mtDNA lesions and radical-associated mitochondrial dysfunction in human hearts exposed to doxorubicin,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 207, no. 4, pp. 436–444, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kusumoto, H. Kawano, T. Hayashi et al., “Cyclophosphamide-induced cardiotoxicity with a prolonged clinical course diagnosed on an endomyocardial biopsy,” Internal medicine, vol. 52, no. 20, pp. 2311–2315, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Ayza, K. A. Zewdie, B. A. Tesfaye, D. Z. Wondafrash, and A. H. Berhe, “The role of antioxidants in ameliorating cyclophosphamide-induced Cardiotoxicity,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, Article ID 4965171, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
B. F. Bulten, M. Sollini, R. Boni et al., “Cardiac molecular pathways influenced by doxorubicin treatment in mice,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2514, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Wenningmann, M. Knapp, A. Ande, T. R. Vaidya, and S. Ait-Oudhia, “Insights into doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: molecular mechanisms, preventive strategies, and early monitoring,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 219–232, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chahine, J. Hanna, H. Makhlouf, L. Duca, L. Martiny, and R. Chahine, “Protective effect of saffron extract against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in isolated rabbit heart,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1564–1571, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chahine, H. Makhlouf, L. Duca, L. Martiny, and R. Chahine, “Cardioprotective effect of saffron extracts against acute doxorubicin toxicity in isolated rabbit hearts submitted to ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, vol. 69, no. 11-12, pp. 459–470, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Chahine, M. Nader, L. Duca, L. Martiny, and R. Chahine, “Saffron extracts alleviate cardiomyocytes injury induced by doxorubicin and ischemia-reperfusion in vitro,” Drug and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Chu, Y. Zhang, Y. Xue et al., “Crocin protects against cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin through TLR-2/NF-κB signal pathway in vivo and vitro,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 84, p. 106548, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Razavi, H. Hosseinzadeh, A. R. Movassaghi, M. Imenshahidi, and K. Abnous, “Protective effect of crocin on diazinon induced cardiotoxicity in rats in subchronic exposure,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 203, no. 3, pp. 547–555, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Akanji, D. Rotimi, and O. S. Adeyemi, “Hypoxia-inducible factors as an alternative source of treatment strategy for cancer,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 8547846, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
G. L. Semenza, “Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 721–732, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Yewalkar, V. Deore, A. Padgaonkar et al., “Development of novel inhibitors targeting HIF-1α towards anticancer drug discovery,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 6426–6429, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Balamurugan, “HIF-1 at the crossroads of hypoxia, inflammation, and cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1058–1066, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Pialoux, R. Mounier, A. D. Brown, C. D. Steinback, J. M. Rawling, and M. J. Poulin, “Relationship between oxidative stress and HIF-1α mRNA during sustained hypoxia in humans,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 321–326, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. V. Dang, J.-w. Kim, P. Gao, and J. Yustein, “The interplay between MYC and HIF in cancer,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Trachootham, W. Lu, M. A. Ogasawara, N. R. D. Valle, and P. Huang, “Redox regulation of cell survival,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1343–1374, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Razmaraii, H. Babaei, A. Mohajjel Nayebi, G. Assadnassab, J. Ashrafi Helan, and Y. Azarmi, “Crocin treatment prevents doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 157, pp. 145–151, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. M. Elsherbiny, M. F. Salama, E. Said, M. el-Sherbiny, and M. M. H. al-Gayyar, “Crocin protects against doxorubicin-induced myocardial toxicity in rats through down-regulation of inflammatory and apoptic pathways,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 247, pp. 39–48, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Xin Su et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2594

Downloads

1280

Citations