Intrauterine Growth Retardation Affects Intestinal Health of Suckling Piglets via Altering Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity, Glucose Uptake, Tight Junction, and Immune Responses

Tang, Xiaopeng; Xiong, Kangning

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2644205

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 2644205 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2644205

Intrauterine Growth Retardation Affects Intestinal Health of Suckling Piglets via Altering Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity, Glucose Uptake, Tight Junction, and Immune Responses

Xiaopeng Tang^1,2and Kangning Xiong^1,2

Academic Editor: Juan Gambini

Received11 Oct 2021

Revised23 Jan 2022

Accepted02 Mar 2022

Published19 Mar 2022

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) on the intestinal morphology, intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis, intestinal antioxidant capacity, intestinal glucose absorption capacity, and intestinal barrier function of piglets during the suckling period. A total of eight normal-birth-weight (NBW) piglets and eight IUGR newborn piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) were selected from eight litters, one NBW and one IUGR newborn piglet per litter. In each litter, piglets with birth weight of (within one SD of the mean birth weight) were selected as NBW piglets and piglets with birth weight of (two SD below the mean birth weight) were selected as IUGR piglets. At 21 days of age, all piglets were killed by exsanguinations for sampling. The results showed the body weight (BW) of IUGR piglets on day 0, day 7, day 14, and day 21, and the body weight gain (BWG) of IUGR piglets was significantly lower than that of NBW piglets. IUGR piglets exhibited impaired intestinal morphology, raised enterocyte apoptosis, and increased oxidative damage. It showed that IUGR leads to a lower antioxidant capacity and glucose absorption in the jejunum. In accordance, IUGR caused the intestinal barrier dysfunction by impairing tight junctions and increasing intestinal inflammatory injury. Collectively, these results add to our understanding that IUGR affects intestinal health of suckling piglets via altering intestinal antioxidant capacity, glucose uptake, tight junction, and immune responses, and the slow growth of piglets with IUGR may be associated with intestinal injury.

1. Introduction

Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) is usually defined as a failure of normal growth and development of a mammalian embryo/fetus or its organs during pregnancy, which has become a difficult problem in human medicine and animal husbandry [1, 2]. Animals with IUGR are characterized by feeding intolerance and gut dysfunction, which negatively influences neonatal survival, postnatal growth, feed utilization, and normal function of tissues or organs [3, 4]. As a kind of common domestic mammal animal with multiple pregnancies, pigs have a high incidence of IUGR (about 15%-20%), which would cause considerable economic losses in large-scale pig production farms [1, 5]. Therefore, a good understanding of the characteristics of intestinal injury in IUGR piglets is of prime importance to improve the growth performance and health status of IUGR animals. Meanwhile, due to the high similarities between pigs and humans in anatomy, physiology, and nutrient metabolism, IUGR pigs can be used as an ideal animal model to study human diseases [6, 7].

The suckling period is an important stage for the continuous improvement of intestinal digestive function, the gradual maturity of the immune system, and the early colonization of intestinal microorganisms, which has a profound impact on the growth and development of animals [8]. Previous studies had confirmed that IUGR could cause impaired development of the gastrointestinal tract of piglets, which is manifested by decreased intestinal length and weight [9], decreased villus height (VH) and increased crypt depth (CD) [10], increased apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells [11], and increased oxidative damage [12]. The delay and alteration of gut development of IUGR piglets are likely to play a major role in poor adaptability, slow growth, and high morbidity and mortality after birth [13].

Normally, oxidative stress and damage are due to high concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the negative effects can be balanced by antioxidant defense mechanisms, including nonenzymatic antioxidant systems (such as ascorbic acid, vitamin E, and glutathione) and enzymatic antioxidant systems, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) [14]. Previous studies revealed that IUGR could impair intestinal morphology and cause serious oxidative damage [12, 15], which may result in a poor intestinal absorption of nutrients, such as glucose. Intestinal health of piglets at the end of lactation is critical to postweaning adaptation. However, studies that describe the intestinal health of IUGR neonatal piglets at the end of lactation are currently very limited. Therefore, in the present study, we chose IUGR piglets as animal model to investigate the effects of IUGR on intestinal health of piglets from the aspects of intestinal antioxidant capacity, glucose absorption, and intestinal barrier function.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

The experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the animal welfare committee of the Guizhou Normal University (Guiyang, China). The sows with similar birth order (third or fourth) were fed with the same gestating diet. On the day of delivery, the body weight of each newborn piglet was recorded. A total of eight normal-birth-weight (NBW) and eight IUGR newborn piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) were selected from eight litters (4 males and 4 females), one NBW and one IUGR newborn piglet per litter. In each litter, piglets with birth weight of (within one SD of the mean birth weight) were selected as NBW piglets and piglets with birth weight of (two SD below the mean birth weight) were selected as IUGR piglets. During suckling, selected NBW and IUGR piglets were suckled by their mother sows to 21 days of age. The body weight (BW) of the piglets was recorded at days of 0, 7, 14, and 21 to observe the average body weight gain (BWG) of the piglets during suckling.

2.2. Sample Collection

At 21 days of age, blood was obtained by jugular venipuncture and then centrifuged at for 15 min at 4°C to obtain serum samples (). All pigs were exsanguinated after being anaesthetized with an injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg kg^-1 BW). One piece of jejunum segment was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for examination of intestinal morphology (). Jejunum mucosa samples were collected from the middle jejunum and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for subsequent analysis (), among which four jejunum mucosa samples (2 males and 2 females) were used for real-time PCR analysis (). The jejunal mucosa was homogenized in ice-cold PBS and then centrifuged at for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.3. Intestinal Histomorphology

Paraffin sections (approximately 5 mm) of jejunum samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and VH and CD were measured using a light microscope with a computer-assisted morphometric system (BioScan Optimetric, BioScan Inc., Edmonds, WA, USA) according to a previous study [16].

2.4. Flow Cytometry

The apoptosis of jejunum mucosa cells was measured by flow cytometry according to previous study [14]. Gently scrape the jejunum mucosa with a clean glass slide, place it in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Solarbio, Beijing, China), wash with PBS twice, and prepare into single cell suspension. Collected cells were incubated with 10 μM Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) (Annexin V-FITC/PI kits) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Apoptotic cells were identified using a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using the CELLQuest software.

2.5. Serum and Jejunal Antioxidant Capacity of Suckling Piglets

Serum and jejunum antioxidant indices, including total SOD (SOD Assay Kit, no. A001-3-2), GSH-Px (GSH-Px Activity Testing Kit, no. A005-1-2), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC Activity Testing Kit, no. A015-2-1), and malonaldehyde (MDA Concentration Testing Kit, no. A003-1-2), were measured according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.6. ELISA Analysis of Immunoglobulins and Cytokines

The secreted immunoglobulin (sIgA) and cytokines including interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) in jejunum mucosa were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Cusabio Biotech Co., Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. AKP and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase Activity in Jejunum Mucosa

Jejunum mucosa alkaline phosphatase (AKP) was measured using an alkaline phosphatase assay kit (no. A059-2-2), and sodium/potassium-transporting adenosine triphosphatase (Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase) activity was measured using the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase assay kit (no. A070-2-2) according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.8. Real-Time PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

The mRNA expression of SGLT1, GLUT2, AMPK-α1, ZO-1, Claudin-1, and Occludin was analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR as described previously [17]. The primers of genes (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) are shown in Table 1. β-Actin was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize the target gene expression. The formula 2-^(ΔΔCt), where , was used to calculated the relative gene expression [16].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data were performed using Shapiro-Wilk of IBM SPSS statistics 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to test data of normal distribution, and was considered the data are normally distributed. Then, the statistical analysis between the two groups was performed by Student’s -test of IBM SPSS statistics 21.0. The results were presented as the (SEM). The results of all data analyses were input into GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) software for graphical display. Mean values were considered to be significantly different when .

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

The effects of IUGR on weight gain of piglets during the suckling period are listed in Figure 1. It showed that the BW of IUGR piglets on day 0, day 7, day 14, and day 21 were significantly lower () than those of NBW piglets (Figure 1(a)); the BWG of IUGR piglets were significantly lower () than those of NBW piglets (Figure 1(b)). It means that IUGR had a significantly negative effect on weight gain of piglets during the suckling period.

(a)

(b)

3.2. Intestinal Histomorphology

The effects of IUGR on intestinal morphology are presented in Figure 2. In comparison with NBW piglets, the IUGR piglets exhibited a decrease () of VH and the ratio of villous height to crypt depth (VCR). It also showed that there was a tendency () to increase the jejunum CD of IUGR piglets compared to NBW piglets.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Intestinal Damage Caused by IUGR

To determine the effects of IUGR on intestinal damage, the apoptosis of mucosa cells and oxidative damage in the jejunum was measured. The flow cytometry results showed that the apoptosis of jejunum mucosa cells was higher () in IUGR piglets than in NBW piglets (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). IUGR could cause a serious intestinal oxidative injury, which is indicated by a higher () MDA level in serum (Figure 3(c)) and jejunum intestine (Figure 3(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.4. Antioxidant Activities

The effects of IUGR on serum and intestinal antioxidant property are presented in Figure 4. Compared with the NBW piglets, the IUGR piglets had a lower () T-AOC level (Figure 4(a)), GSH-Px activity (Figure 4(b)), and SOD activity (Figure 4(c)) in serum and a lower () T-AOC level (Figure 4(e)), GSH-Px activity (Figure 4(f)), SOD activity (Figure 4(g)), and CAT activity (Figure 4(h)) in the jejunum.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

3.5. Glucose Absorption Capacity

To determine the effects of IUGR on glucose absorption capacity, AKP and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase activity and SGLT1, GLUT2, and AMPK-α1 gene expression were measured. The results showed that the AKP activity (Figure 5(a)), Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase activity (Figure 5(b)), and SGLT1 (Figure 5(c)) and AMPK-α1 (Figure 5(e)) mRNA expression in jejunum mucosa decreased significantly () when piglets suffered from IUGR, while there was no difference in the expression of GLUT2 (Figure 5(d)) between the NBW piglets and IUGR piglets.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

3.6. Tight Junctions

The effects of EGF on gene expression of tight junctions (ZO-1, Claudin-1, and Occludin) in jejunum mucosa of piglets are presented in Figure 6. The results showed that, compared with the NBW piglets, the IUGR piglets had a lower () gene expression of ZO-1 (Figure 6(a)) and Occludin (Figure 6(c)) in jejunum mucosa, as well as a tendency () to decrease the gene expression of Claudin-1 (Figure 6(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.7. Immune Response

To determine the immune function in the jejunum mucosa of NBW and IUGR piglets, sIgA and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods. The results showed that the sIgA level (Figure 7(a)) in jejunum mucosa decreased significantly (), while IL-1β (Figure 7(b)) and TNF-α (Figure 7(c)) increased significantly () when piglets suffered from IUGR. There was no difference in IL-6 () between the NBW group and the IUGR group (Figure 7(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

4. Discussion

The birth weight of newborn piglets is an important index in large-scale pig farm, largely because it is positively correlated with survival rate and weaning weight of pigs [18, 19]. IUGR impairs the growth and development of the fetus and is ultimately characterized by a low birth weight. In the present study, IUGR significantly reduced BW and BWG in the whole suckling period (day 0 to day 21), which were consistent with the previous studies that IUGR piglets showed a lower birth weight [4] and weaning weight [20], a slow growth before [20, 21] and after weaning [4, 5, 22] compared to NBW piglets. Previous studies as well as the present study all confirmed that IUGR have an adverse effect on growth performance of piglets.

The intestinal tract is not only an important organ for nutrients digestion, absorption, and metabolism but also an important barrier for animals to prevent the toxins, allergens, and pathogens from the external environment into the circulation system [23–25]. The integrity of morphology and function of the intestine is critical to intestinal health and the utilization of nutrients. So, the slow growth of piglets with IUGR may be associated with intestinal injury. To verify the above hypothesis, we chose 21-day-old IUGR piglets as animal model to investigate the effects of IUGR on intestinal morphology, intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis, intestinal oxidative damage and antioxidant capacity, intestinal glucose absorption capacity, intestinal tight junctions, and immune response.

Substantial evidence has indicated that IUGR is associated with impaired intestinal development [9, 26, 27]. Intestinal morphology which is often evaluated by VH, CD, and VCR can reflect the intestinal development and function [28]. In the present study, the IUGR piglets exhibited a decrease of VH and VCR and an increase tendency of CD in the jejunum. These results are consistent with previous studies who also reported IUGR damage to the intestinal morphology of piglets [13, 26, 27, 29]. The integrity of intestinal morphology is regulated by both cell proliferation and apoptosis [14, 30]. The balance between intestinal epithelial cellular proliferation and apoptosis is necessary to maintain the intestinal barrier function [14]. In the present study, piglets with IUGR had a higher apoptosis rate in jejunum epithelial cells than NBW piglets, which is similar to previous studies that IUGR increased cell apoptosis in the small intestine of neonatal piglets [31], weaned piglets [27], and rats [32].

Oxidative stress is widely recognized as a state of imbalance of oxidation and antioxidation, which has been widely implicated in intestinal epithelium apoptosis [14, 33, 34]. MDA is the primary product of lipid peroxidation and usually considered as one of the markers of oxidative stress [35]. The increased level of MDA in serum and jejunum in the present study indicated that IUGR caused intestinal oxidative damage, which is similar to the previous study who also reported that IUGR can increase the content of MDA in jejunum mucosa of pigs [36]. SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT activities antioxidant enzymes are important indicators of antioxidant function [37, 38]. Previous studies have demonstrated that IUGR increased oxidative stress by decreasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as GSH-Px, SOD, and CAT [4, 12, 15, 26, 36]. We also found that IUGR significantly decreased the activities of antioxidant enzymes of GSH-Px, SOD, and CAT. Numerous studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress is associated with many pathological conditions, including intestinal barrier dysfunction and various digestive tract diseases [14, 39–41]. Therefore, alleviating the negative effects of oxidative stress damage is crucial for the development of IUGR newborn piglets.

It is commonly accepted that glucose is the main carbon and energy source of animals and the small intestine is an important site for glucose absorption [42]. SGLT1, GLUT2, AMPK-α1, AKP, and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase play important roles in glucose absorption in the small intestine. SGLT1, a high-affinity and low-transport-capacity glucose transporter, is the primary carrier protein responsible for the absorption of glucose from the lumen of the intestine across the brush border membrane of intestinal epithelial cells, which is dependent on Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase for energy supply [42–45]. GLU2, a low-affinity and high-transport-capacity glucose transporter, can mediate the intracellular glucose transporter to portal vein [42, 43, 45]. AKP is a key enzyme in intestinal digestion and absorption, which can accelerate the uptake and transfer of nutrients and provide energy for the body indirectly [46]. AMPK is a key molecule in the regulation of biological energy metabolism and has been demonstrated to play important roles in the regulation of cellular glucose uptake through the stimulation of SGLT1 and GLUT2 [47–49]. In the present study, piglets with IUGR had a lower AKP and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase activity and a lower SGLT1 and AMPK-α1 mRNA expression in jejunum mucosa while there was no difference in the expression of GLUT2 compared to NBW piglets. These results indicated that IUGR negatively affects the intestinal glucose absorption capacity, through inhibiting the expression of AMPK-α, thereby reducing express SGLT1 transporters but not GLU2 transporters. Previous studies revealed that the continuous impairment of intestinal development of piglets with IUGR would result in a poor intestinal nutrient absorption capacity by inhibiting the expression of proteins involved in key biological processes such as nutrient absorption, digestion, and transport and protein synthesis in the small intestine of newborn and preweaning piglets [2, 5, 50, 51], which are similar to the present study.

Tight junctions including zonula occludens (ZO-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3), Claudins, Occludin, and junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) are important components of the intestinal mechanical barrier, which is critical in protecting the intestinal barrier function, reducing the intestinal permeability, and preventing bacteria endotoxin and toxic macromolecules’ entry into the body [23, 36]. In the present study, the IUGR piglets had a lower gene expression of ZO-1 and Occludin in jejunum mucosa than NBW piglets. Similar result also found that the Occludin mRNA expression in the IUGR growing pigs was lower than that in NBW pigs [36]. These results indicated that IUGR damaged the intestinal barrier function by decreasing the transcription of tight junction genes.

In addition, the immune and inflammatory response is closely associated with intestinal barrier function [52, 53]. sIgA, an immunoglobulin secreted by plasma cells of the intestinal mucosa, is a major effector of the intestinal mucosal immunity, which acts as the first defense line to prevent the colonization of pathogens in the intestinal mucosa and plays an important role in local anti-infection of the body [24, 54]. Our results from the present study showed that the sIgA content in jejunum mucosa significantly decreased when piglets suffered from IUGR, which indicated that IUGR damages the intestinal immune function. It was reported that excessive intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis and uncontrolled oxidative stress in the intestine could result in intestinal dysfunction, thereby leading to the inflammatory response and release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [26, 27, 55]. The results of the present study suggested that IUGR enhanced the concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) in the jejunum. Similar to our study, Niu et al. [27] reported that weaned piglets with IUGR had a higher IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α concentrations than NBW weaned piglets; Yan et al. [36] showed that pigs in the IUGR group had a higher mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ than NBW pigs; Huang et al. [56] demonstrated that piglets with IUGR have increased TNF-α and IL-6 level at birth, and Wang et al. [57] also showed that the mRNA expression of TNF-α in IUGR piglets was higher than that in NBW piglets. All these studies as well as our study could indicate that IUGR caused swine intestinal inflammatory injury.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present results showed that IUGR had a significantly negative effect on growth performance of piglets during the suckling period. Meanwhile, IUGR could cause intestinal injury in the jejunum of suckling piglets, which is indicated by injured intestinal morphology and tight junctions, increased apoptosis of enterocytes, increased oxidative damage, decreased glucose absorption capacity, reduced jejunum immunity, and increased intestinal inflammatory injury. Collectively, these results add to our understanding that the slow growth of piglets with IUGR may be associated with intestinal injury.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the Key Project of Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province (No. 5411 2017 Qiankehe Pingtai Rencai), the World Top Discipline Program of Guizhou Province (No. 125 2019 Qianjiao Keyan Fa), the Natural Science Research Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province (Qianjiaohe KY Zi [2021] 294), and the Doctoral Launched Scientific Research Program of Guizhou Normal University (GZNUD [2018] 26).

References

G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, J. M. Walace, and T. E. Spencer, “Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 2316–2337, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, L. Chen, D. Li et al., “Intrauterine growth restriction affects the proteomes of the small intestine, liver, and skeletal muscle in newborn pigs,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. K. Pallotto and H. W. Kilbride, “Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 257–269, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Niu, J. He, H. Ahmad et al., “Dietary curcumin supplementation increases antioxidant capacity, upregulates Nrf2 and Hmox1 levels in the liver of piglet model with intrauterine growth retardation,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 12, article 2978, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xiong, J. You, W. Zhang et al., “IIntrauterine growth restriction alters growth performance, plasma hormones, and small intestinal microbial communities in growing-finishing pigs,” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 86, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ferenc, P. Pietrzak, M. M. Godlewski et al., “Intrauterine growth retarded piglet as a model for humans - studies on the perinatal development of the gut structure and function,” Reproductive Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hu, X. Peng, H. Chen et al., “Effects of intrauterine growth retardation and Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on growth performance, intestinal development and immune function of piglets during the suckling period,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1753–1765, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mickiewicz, R. Zabielski, B. Grenier et al., “Structural and functional development of small intestine in intrauterine growth retarded porcine offspring born to gilts fed diets with differing protein ratios throughout pregnancy,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 225–239, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Wang, Y. Huo, F. Shi, R. Xu, and R. Hutz, “Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on development of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal pigs,” Neonatology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D'Inca, L. Che, T. Thymann, P. T. Sangild, and I. Le Huërou-Luron, “Intrauterine growth restriction reduces intestinal structure and modifies the response to colostrum in preterm and term piglets,” Livestock Science, vol. 133, no. 1-3, pp. 20–22, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, D. Chen, X. Mao, and B. Yu, “Effects of maternal folic acid supplementation on morphology and apoptosis-related gene expression in jejunum of newborn intrauterine growth retarded piglets,” Archives of Animal Nutrition, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 376–385, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, Y. Li, and T. Wang, “Antioxidant capacity and concentration of redox-active trace mineral in fully weaned intrauterine growth retardation piglets,” Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 201–207, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Che, Q. Zhou, Y. Liu et al., “Flaxseed oil supplementation improves intestinal function and immunity, associated with altered intestinal microbiome and fatty acid profile in pigs with intrauterine growth retardation,” Food & Function, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 8149–8160, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tang, B. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Yu, and R. Fang, “Epidermal growth factor, through alleviating oxidative stress, protect IPEC-J2 cells from lipopolysaccharides-induced apoptosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 3, article 848, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hu, X. Peng, L. Qin et al., “Dietary nucleotides supplementation during the suckling period improves the antioxidative ability of neonates with intrauterine growth retardation when using a pig model,” RSC Advances, vol. 8, no. 29, pp. 16152–16160, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Peng, D. Deng, S. Chen et al., “The effects of dietary porous zinc oxide supplementation on growth performance, inflammatory cytokines and tight junction’s gene expression in early-weaned piglets,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 311–318, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tang, W. Su, and R. Fang, “Effects of calcitonin on porcine intestinal epithelial cells proliferation, phosphorus absorption, and NaPi-IIb expression,” Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 2167–2174, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. Dwyer, J. M. Fletcher, and N. C. Stickland, “Muscle cellularity and postnatal growth in the pig,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 3339–3343, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. D. Beaulieu, J. L. Aalhus, N. H. Williams, and J. F. Patience, “Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 2767–2778, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, Y. Niu, J. He, L. Zhang, C. Wang, and T. Wang, “Dietary dihydroartemisinin supplementation attenuates hepatic oxidative damage of weaned piglets with intrauterine growth retardation through the Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway,” Animals, vol. 9, no. 12, article 1144, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Han, L. Hu, Y. Xuan et al., “Effects of high nutrient intake on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and immune function of neonatal intra-uterine growth-retarded pigs,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 1819–1827, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xu, K. Bai, J. He et al., “Leucine improves growth performance of intrauterine growth retardation piglets by modifying gene and protein expression related to protein synthesis,” Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tang, H. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Li, J. Zhong, and R. Fang, “Epidermal growth factor and intestinal barrier function,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2016, article 1927348, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Tang, X. Liu, J. Zhong, and R. Fang, “Potential application of Lonicera japonica extracts in animal production: from the perspective of intestinal health,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 12, article 719877, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Curciarello, K. E. Canziani, G. H. Docena, and C. I. Muglia, “Contribution of non-immune cells to activation and modulation of the intestinal inflammation,” Frontirs in Immunology, vol. 10, article 647, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Chen, L. Zhang, and T. Wang, “N-Acetylcysteine protects against intrauterine growth retardation-induced intestinal injury via restoring redox status and mitochondrial function in neonatal piglets,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 3335–3347, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Niu, Y. Zhao, J. He et al., “Dietary dihydroartemisinin supplementation alleviates intestinal inflammatory injury through TLR4/NOD/NF-κB signaling pathway in weaned piglets with intrauterine growth retardation,” Animal Nutrition, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 667–678, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Zou, X. Xiong, H. N. Liu, J. Zhou, Y. H. Liu, and Y. L. Yin, “Effects of dietary lysozyme levels on growth performance, intestinal morphology, immunity response and microbiota community of growing pigs,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1643–1650, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Che, L. Hu, Q. Zhou et al., “Microbial insight into dietary protein source affects intestinal function of pigs with intrauterine growth retardation,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 327–344, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nunes, C. Bernardazzi, and H. S. D. Souza, “Cell death and inflammatory bowel diseases: apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy in the intestinal epithelium,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, article 218493, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wang, L. Zhang, G. Zhou et al., “Dietary L-arginine supplementation improves the intestinal development through increasing mucosal Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin signals in intra-uterine growth retarded piglets,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1371–1381, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baserga, C. Bertolotto, N. K. Maclennan et al., “Uteroplacental insufficiency decreases small intestine growth and alters apoptotic homeostasis in term intrauterine growth retarded rats,” Early Human Development, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 93–105, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhu, X. Cai, Q. Guo, X. Chen, S. Zhu, and J. Xu, “Effect of n-acetyl cysteine on enterocyte apoptosis and intracellular signalling pathways’ response to oxidative stress in weaned piglets,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 110, no. 11, pp. 1938–1947, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Denning, H. Takaishi, S. E. Crowe, I. Boldogh, A. Jevnikar, and P. B. Ernst, “Oxidative stress induces the expression of Fas and Fas ligand and apoptosis in murine intestinal epithelial cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1641–1650, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Pirinccioglu, D. Gökalp, M. Pirinccioglu, G. Kizil, and M. Kizil, “Malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyl (PCO) levels as biomarkers of oxidative stress in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 1220–1224, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yan, J. Zhang, H. Han et al., “Curcumin alleviates IUGR jejunum damage by increasing antioxidant capacity through Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in growing pigs,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 1, article 41, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zha, Z. Cui, M. Qi et al., “Dietary baicalin zinc supplementation alleviates oxidative stress and enhances nutrition absorption in deoxynivalenol challenged pigs,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 614–625, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Liao, Y. Li, M. Li et al., “Baicalin alleviates deoxynivalenol-induced intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress damage by inhibiting NF- _κ_ B and increasing mTOR signaling pathways in piglets,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 140, article 111326, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Chen, J. Chen, Q. Chen et al., “Lactobacillus delbrueckii protected intestinal integrity, alleviated intestinal oxidative damage, and activated toll-like receptor-bruton's tyrosine kinase-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 pathway in weaned piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide,” Antioxidants, vol. 10, no. 3, article 468, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Navarro-Yepes, M. Burns, A. Anandhan et al., “Oxidative stress, redox signaling, and autophagy: cell death versus survival,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–85, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zha, D. Yuan, Z. Cui et al., “The evaluation of the antioxidant and intestinal protective effects of baicalin-copper in deoxynivalenol-challenged piglets,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2020, article 5363546, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Tang and K. Xiong, “Effects of epidermal growth factor on glutamine and glucose absorption by IPEC-J2 cells challenged by lipopolysaccharide using the Ussing chamber system,” Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 417–422, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Huerzeler, V. Petkovic, M. Sekulic-Jablanovic, K. Kucharava, M. B. Wright, and D. Bodmer, “Insulin receptor and glucose transporters in the mammalian cochlea,” Audiology and Neurootology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. Chen, B. G. Tuo, and H. Dong, “Regulation of intestinal glucose absorption by ion channels and transporters,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Wang, W. L. Chang, Y. C. Huang et al., “An essential role of cAMP response element-binding protein in epidermal growth factor-mediated induction of sodium/glucose cotransporter 1 gene expression and intestinal glucose uptake,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 64, pp. 239–251, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Geddes and D. J. Philpott, “A new role for intestinal alkaline phosphatase in gut barrier maintenance,” Gastroenterology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Carling, “The role of the AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation of energy homeostasis,” Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol. 286, pp. 72–85, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sopjani, S. K. Bhavsar, S. Fraser, B. E. Kemp, M. Föller, and F. Lang, “Regulation of Na⁺-coupled glucose carrier SGLT1 by AMP-activated protein kinase,” Molecular Membrane Biology, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 137–144, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Walker, H. B. Jijon, H. Diaz, P. Salehi, T. Churchill, and K. L. Madsen, “5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR) enhances GLUT2-dependent jejunal glucose transport: a possible role for AMPK,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 385, no. 2, pp. 485–491, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, W. Wu, G. Lin, D. Li, G. Wu, and J. Wang, “Temporal proteomic analysis reveals continuous impairment of intestinal development in neonatal piglets with intrauterine growth restriction,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 924–935, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Huang, Z. H. Wu, T. T. Li et al., “Perturbation of the lipid metabolism and intestinal inflammation in growing pigs with low birth weight is associated with the alterations of gut microbiota,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 719, article 137382, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tang, D. Yuan, and P. Liao, “Berberine improves intestinal barrier function and reduces inflammation, immunosuppression, and oxidative stress by regulating the NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathway in deoxynivalenol-challenged piglets,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 289, article 117865, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zha, R. Tu, Z. Cui et al., “Baicalin-zinc complex alleviates inflammatory responses and hormone profiles by microbiome in deoxynivalenol induced piglets,” Frontiers in Nutrition, vol. 8, article 738281, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhou, Q. Lu, X. Kang, G. Tian, D. Ming, and J. Yang, “Protective role of a new polysaccharide extracted from Lonicera japonica Thunb in mice with ulcerative colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2021, article 8878633, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Jozawa, A. Inoue-Yamauchi, S. Arimura, and Y. J. Yamanashi, “Loss of C/EBPδ enhances apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells and exacerbates experimental colitis in mice,” Genes to Cells, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 619–626, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Huang, N. Li, C. Liu et al., “Characteristics of the gut microbiota colonization, inflammatory profile, and plasma metabolome in intrauterine growth restricted piglets during the first 12 hours after birth,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 748–758, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, J. Degroote, C. Van Ginneken et al., “Intrauterine growth restriction in neonatal piglets affects small intestinal mucosal permeability and mRNA expression of redox-sensitive genes,” FASEB Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 863–873, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Xiaopeng Tang and Kangning Xiong. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

630

Downloads

527

Citations

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Intrauterine Growth Retardation Affects Intestinal Health of Suckling Piglets via Altering Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity, Glucose Uptake, Tight Junction, and Immune Responses

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

2.2. Sample Collection

2.3. Intestinal Histomorphology

2.4. Flow Cytometry

2.5. Serum and Jejunal Antioxidant Capacity of Suckling Piglets

2.6. ELISA Analysis of Immunoglobulins and Cytokines

2.7. AKP and Na+/K+-ATPase Activity in Jejunum Mucosa

2.8. Real-Time PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

2.9. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

3.2. Intestinal Histomorphology

3.3. Intestinal Damage Caused by IUGR

3.4. Antioxidant Activities

3.5. Glucose Absorption Capacity

3.6. Tight Junctions

3.7. Immune Response

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Data Availability

Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

2.7. AKP and Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase Activity in Jejunum Mucosa