Impact of Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Energy Metabolism on Aging and Longevity 2021View this Special Issue
Canonical Wnt Signaling in the Pathology of Iron Overload-Induced Oxidative Stress and Age-Related Diseases
Iron accumulates in the vital organs with aging. This is associated with oxidative stress, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction leading to age-related disorders. Abnormal iron levels are linked to neurodegenerative diseases, liver injury, cancer, and ocular diseases. Canonical Wnt signaling is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway that regulates many cellular functions including cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell migration, and stem cell renewal. Recent evidences indicate that iron regulates Wnt signaling, and iron chelators like deferoxamine and deferasirox can inhibit Wnt signaling and cell growth. Canonical Wnt signaling is implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases, and there are significant efforts ongoing to develop innovative therapies targeting the aberrant Wnt signaling. This review examines how intracellular iron accumulation regulates Wnt signaling in various tissues and their potential contribution in the progression of age-related diseases.
A multitude of age-related diseases are associated with disrupted cellular iron homeostasis. Wnt/β-catenin signaling, also known as canonical Wnt signaling, is a crucial pathway that mediates cell development and proliferation. Hence, abnormal Wnt signaling can be detrimental and is implicated in diseases across different tissue types. Interestingly, an overlap between dysregulated iron homeostasis and aberrant Wnt signaling exists in pathologies including colorectal carcinoma (CRC) [1–3], diabetic retinopathy (DR) [4, 5], and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [6–8]. For this reason, there has been a recent interest in studying the interplay between iron homeostasis and canonical Wnt signaling.
Iron is a necessary dietary component, as it is crucial to processes ranging from oxygen transport by red blood cells  to fetal neurodevelopment . Cellular iron homeostasis and mitochondrial iron homeostasis are interdependent as mitochondria must import iron to form iron–sulfur clusters and heme, which are critical for vital cellular functions. Imbalances in iron homeostasis leading to its accumulation can be particularly dangerous, such as in hereditary hemochromatosis . The toxicity due to iron overload is largely related to the potential of iron to induce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation. Iron-mediated oxidative stress arises because excess iron, a prooxidant, generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) via the Fenton reaction . ROS can then affect the integrity of DNA , as well as other important proteins and lipids involved in cellular function . Iron-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction is a result of iron-induced mitochondrial DNA damage, which correlates with defects in iron–sulfur cluster biogenesis, electron transport chain, and heme synthesis . Iron-mediated inflammation occurs due to the proinflammatory nature of both excess labile iron  and iron bound to ferritin [17, 18], an iron storage protein. Cellular labile iron promotes inflammation via interleukin-1β (IL-1β) secretion and NLRP3 inflammasome stimulation in human monocytes through the NF-κB pathway . Similarly, ferritin has been shown to function as a local cytokine through NF-κB pathway activation in activated rat stellate cells, leading to significant increases in inflammatory molecules such as IL-1β . Hyperferritinemia, a condition characterized by excess ferritin levels, is constitutively linked to disorders like familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis  and macrophage activation syndrome  that are characterized by overactive inflammatory responses. In addition, research has demonstrated that inflammation itself can lead to iron accumulation in tissues such as the retina  and the liver  by upregulating hepcidin and thereby decreasing ferroportin expression. These findings indicate a positive feedback loop, where iron-mediated inflammation leads to further iron accumulation and subsequently increased iron-mediated inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction.
The rationale for much of the research discussed in the following sections is that oxidative stress [21–23], inflammation [24, 25], and mitochondrial dysfunction  have also been indicated as mediators of abnormal canonical Wnt signaling. This overlap raises the fundamental question of our review: what role does iron overload have in regulating Wnt signaling? While the relationship between iron, Wnt signaling, and cancer has become increasingly well-established [27–29], this same relationship is less documented in pathologies outside of cancer. The present review is aimed at providing an update on the canonical Wnt pathway with respect to iron-mediated aberrant Wnt/β-catenin signaling in several tissue-specific contexts.
2. The Canonical Wnt Pathway
2.1. Contextualizing Wnt
The first Wnt gene was discovered in 1982 as an oncogene activated in mouse models of virally induced mammary carcinoma and was named Int-1 . Several years later, an important gene in Drosophila larval development known as the wingless (Wg) gene was found to be a homolog of the murine Int-1 . The discovery of the Wg homolog to mouse Int-1 and subsequent research [32, 33] has demonstrated that the canonical Wnt pathway is highly conserved amongst a variety of species. Even complexity within the Wnt gene family seems to be conserved, as the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis shares 11 of the 12 known Wnt gene subfamilies with humans . Because of the conserved nature of the Wnt genes and the implication of Wnt regulation in a variety of physiological events, Wnt/β-catenin research has led to a plethora of discoveries over the last four decades.
Today, we know of 19 Wnt genes in the mammalian genome that encode 12 subfamilies of Wnt proteins (Wnts) . These Wnts are involved in a range of cell events but centrally act as growth factors and cause cell proliferation in a variety of cell types during both embryogenesis and adult tissue homeostasis [35–37]. In addition, Wnts contribute to the directional organization of proliferating cells by altering gene expression and affecting cytoskeletal and mitotic architecture [38–43]. All Wnt genes encode glycoproteins that are about 40 kDA in size and that contain many conserved cysteine residues . After translation, important palmitoylation and glycosylation events occur on Wnt proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Palmitoylation involves the attachment of a palmitoleic acid to a conserved serine residue on Wnt proteins [45, 46] by an O-acyltransferase known as porcupine [47, 48]. This lipid modification is necessary for Wnt signaling, as it is used downstream as a binding site for the Wnt receptor, Frizzled , as well as the Wntless protein that aids in Wnt secretion [50, 51]. Of the two major types of posttranslational modifications in the ER, glycosylation is the one less understood. Wnts vary in the number of glycosylated sites present, and the presence of these glycans seems to have varying importance. Site-directed mutagenesis of specific glycosylated regions impairs secretion in certain Wnts , while in other Wnt isoforms, it does not seem to have any affect at all . Though further studies are required to determine the exact function of posttranslational Wnt glycosylation, glycosylation currently has significance as a signal for the secretion of few specific Wnt glycoproteins.
2.2. Wnt Trafficking and Secretion
The trafficking and secretory pathways are two examples of conserved characteristics between the human Wnt proteins [54, 55]. As aforementioned, Wnt trafficking and secretion are dependent upon proper lipid modification by porcupine in the ER [47, 48]. This is because Wntless (Wls), a transmembrane protein, binds the palmitoleic acid in the ER for proper Wnt trafficking and subsequent Wnt release [50, 51, 56]. Indeed, knockouts of Wls or inhibitors of porcupine result in the accumulation of Wnt proteins in ER . Once bound to Wnt, Wls will travel with Wnt through the Golgi and ultimately to the plasma membrane [50, 51, 56]. Here, Wls may act in one of the two ways. One possibility is that Wls can leave its respective Wnt glycoprotein and return to the trans-Golgi network [58–60]. This occurs via retrograde movement involving clathrin-mediated endocytosis and retromer retrieval mediated by a specialized ER-retrieval motif [50, 57, 61, 62]. Alternatively, Wls may be incorporated into the membrane of an exosome along with Wnt for secretion [63, 64].
The distance of Wnt secretion and subsequent signaling is a heavily debated topic, as there is evidence for Wnt targeting both local [34, 65] and distant [66, 67] cells. At the Wnt secreting membrane, varying events can occur depending on the desired distance of secretion. Wnts can be tethered for contact-dependent interactions with nearby cells  or used for longer range signaling either through expression on an exosome with Wntless requiring R-SNARE Ykt6 activity  or by binding to solubilizing molecules, such as Swim . After Wnt trafficking and secretion, signaling occurs. The known Wnt pathways can be organized into single canonical Wnt pathway and two noncanonical Wnt pathways . This review will focus on the canonical Wnt pathway, which involves the nuclear localization of active β-catenin, as this is the best studied pathway in relation to iron homeostasis.
2.3. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Cascade
In canonical Wnt signaling, there is a complex system of transducing factors that cooperate to instill cell responsiveness to the Wnt ligands. A central player in this cascade is β-catenin, as it is the primary regulator in Wnt target gene expression. With cytosolic accumulation of β-catenin, subsequent nuclear translocation occurs allowing the protein to bind to the T-Cell Factor/Lymphoid Enhancer Factor (TCF/LEF) transcription factor family [70, 71]. Wnt target cells exhibit the surface receptors Frizzled (FZD) and low-density lipoprotein-related receptor protein 5 or 6 (LRP5/6) to initiate the signal cascade . FZD is a family of cell surface proteins with seven transmembrane domains that contain both an extracellular N-terminal cysteine-rich domain that interacts with Wnt [49, 72, 73], as well as a hydrophobic groove that binds the lipid modifications on Wnt . LRP5 and LRP6 serve as coreceptors necessary for Wnt transduction that form heterodimers with FZD in the presence of Wnt [74, 75]. It has been posited that LRPs contain binding regions for Wnt, as described by several anti-LRP monoclonal antibody studies . While there are a variety of other Wnt receptors that are important for noncanonical signaling , the FZD and LRP-mediated pathway will remain the focus of this review as it is the best understood with relation to iron.
In the absence of Wnt, cytoplasmic β-catenin is bound by an intact destruction complex and targeted for ubiquitin-mediated degradation, preventing β-catenin accumulation and nuclear translocation. This ultimately results in Wnt target gene repression. The destruction complex consists of proteins Axin, Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and Wilms tumor gene on the X chromosome (WTX), casein kinase 1-α (CK1α), glycogen synthase kinase 3-β (GSK-3β), and other factors . Axin is a scaffolding protein that interacts with β-catenin and other members of the destruction complex . APC and WTX, two tumor suppressor proteins, are also essential for an effective destruction complex . CK1α and GSK-3β are serine-threonine kinases that perform multiple functions related to Wnt signaling. In terms of the destruction complex, they phosphorylate Axin-bound β-catenin to target it for ubiquitination [34, 78]. β-Transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP), a component of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, recognizes phosphorylated β-catenin and catalyzes the addition of ubiquitin polymers to direct β-catenin for degradation by proteasomes preventing their nuclear translocation . The absence of β-catenin in the nucleus leaves the repressive TCF/LEF complex active, which then permits Groucho/transducin-like enhancer (Gro/TLE) family proteins to recruit histone deacetylases that inhibit Wnt target gene expression .
In the presence of Wnt, canonical Wnt stimulation begins with Wnt ligand facilitating the heterodimerization of FZD and its coreceptor, such as LRP5 or LRP6. Ligation induces a conformational change in the receptors and by a currently unclear mechanism, recruits, and activates GSK-3β and CK1γ [80–82]. At the membrane, GSK-3β and CK1γ phosphorylate the LRP tail at the PPPSP motif  and in regions adjacent to the PPPSP motifs , respectively. This sequential phosphorylation of the LRP tail results in Axin relocation to the plasma membrane and its physical removal from the cytosol, inhibiting the formation of the β-catenin destruction complex . β-Catenin then accumulates in the cytosol and subsequently translocates to the nucleus. Nuclear β-catenin interacts with the TCF/LEF interface discussed earlier to activate Wnt target gene expression [70, 71, 85, 86] as shown in Figure 1.
2.4. Wnt/β-Catenin Modulation
As previously discussed, Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays a multitude of roles in a host of tissues throughout life. Wnts generally function as growth factors to cause proliferation and have more than 100 downstream target genes [35–37, 87]. Many of these target genes are important cell cycle regulators including C-Myc  and Cyclin D . Others include those related to angiogenesis like VEGF , as well as nearly every component of the Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) . Wnt signaling activates mitochondrial biogenesis, in turn producing elevated levels of ROS and oxidative damage , which is considered to be the cause for certain pathological consequences. Given the wide-ranging functions of canonical Wnt signaling, it is logical that dysfunctional Wnt/β-catenin signaling would have a variety of negative implications. The nature of this aberrance, however, is not as intuitive. In some diseases, such as in cases of CRC  or AMD [7, 8], Wnt signaling is pathologically upregulated, while in others, such as in Norrie disease  or osteopenia , Wnt signaling is pathologically downregulated. For this reason, a variety of positive and negative modulators exist and are important for the understanding of Wnt signaling.
2.4.1. Positive Modulation
Positive modulators of Wnt/β-catenin signaling are those that lead to an increase in active β-catenin translocating to the nucleus and thus increasing the expression of Wnt target genes. In cases of chronic wounds , vitiligo [96, 97], or other diseases characterized by Wnt/β-catenin inactivation, positive Wnt modulators can be protective. However, in the context of diseases characterized by Wnt/β-catenin activation, positive Wnt modulators may be harmful. For example, patients being treated with lithium, a canonical Wnt activator, were shown to have a significantly increased chance of developing renal carcinogenesis .
One important positive regulation pathway of vertebrate Wnt signaling involves the four R-spondin (RSPO) proteins, which are characterized by two furin domains and a thrombospondin domain . In the absence of RSPO ligands, the disheveled protein promotes the destruction of FZD on the membrane by the E3 ligases . However, in the presence of RPSO proteins, the RSPO ligands will bind to leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled 5 (Lgr5) family receptors [101–103] resulting in the membrane clearance of E3 ligases RNF43 and ZNRF3 [104, 105]. In effect, this promotes FZD accumulation on the membrane and increases the sensitivity of a cell to Wnt ligands [104, 105]. Norrin is a second example of a secreted protein that positively modulates Wnt signaling . It is characterized by its cysteine-knot motif  and, with the help of its coreceptor tetraspanin 12 [108, 109], acts by binding directly to the FZD4/LRP5 complex to activate the canonical Wnt pathway [93, 110, 111].
In addition to the well-studied RSPO and Norrin positive modulators, there are several others that have been discovered over the years. Protein phosphatase-2A (PP2A) is a serine-threonine phosphatase composed of three subunits that can positively regulate the canonical Wnt pathway by dephosphorylating a variety of proteins including β-catenin . Other examples include microRNAs miR-135a and miR-135b that directly repress APC expression in colorectal cancer cells, thereby destabilizing the β-catenin destruction complex and allowing Wnt target gene expression . Still, others like heparin sulfate proteoglycans serve as cofactors to promote Wnt signaling in the control of C. elegans mitotic spindle orientation , distal-tip cell migration , and neuronal positioning .
2.4.2. Negative Modulation
Negative modulators of Wnt/β-catenin signaling are those that lead to the destruction of β-catenin and a decrease in the expression of Wnt target genes. This may be protective in diseases characterized by Wnt/β-catenin activation, but deleterious during diseases characterized by Wnt/β-catenin inactivation . The potentially deleterious effect of negative modulators can be seen in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, a disease characterized by Wnt inactivation . Specifically, the worsening of amyloid beta plaque accumulation and subsequent synaptic loss was observed with the presence of the negative regulator Dickkopf-1 [119, 120].
A prototypical downregulator of Wnt signaling is Notum, an extracellular enzyme that inhibits Wnt proteins by removing their vital palmitoylate residues [121, 122]. Notum also partakes in a negative feedback loop, as the TCF/LEF family transcription factors have binding sites in the Notum promoter region to increase its expression [121, 123]. In addition to Notum, extracellular Wnt inhibitors include Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF) proteins [124, 125] and secreted FZD-related proteins (SFRPs) [126–128] that directly bind Wnt proteins to inhibit signaling. There is also another important class of negative Wnt modulators that act as transmembrane antagonists by binding and subsequently blocking Wnt receptors from interacting with Wnt. These include Shisa , Wnt-activated inhibitory factor , Adenomatosis polyposis coli downregulated 1 , and Tiki1 . Lastly, miRNAs have been a recent area of research that have been implicated for negatively modulating Wnt signaling. Some examples include miR-200a, which decreases Wnt target gene transcription , miR-21, which directly represses Wnt1 protein production , and miR-184, which targets Wnt coreceptor FZD-7 to prevent Wnt signaling in retinal neovascularization .
In addition to the Notum feedback loop, there are several other negative feedback loops that regulate canonical Wnt signaling. An important one of these was mentioned in our discussion of positive Wnt regulation, with regard to the E3 ligases RNF43 and ZNRF3. These two ligases are known to control FZD membrane expression by mediating the ubiquitination of the FZD cytoplasmic loops, which leads to FZD lysosomal degradation [136, 137]. A third canonical Wnt signaling negative feedback loop is the conductin/Axin2 loop. Axin2 is a Wnt target gene, and its expression mimics Axin in the destruction complex to increase β-catenin degradation [138, 139], which subsequently downregulates Wnt target gene expression.
2.5. Iron-Mediated Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling during Pathological Conditions
In the remainder of this review, we will discuss the recent findings on how iron modulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling leading to multiple disorders as outlined in Figure 2.
The role of Wnt signaling in cancerous pathologies is historically validated, with the discovery of Wnt signaling based on experimentation involving mouse models of breast cancer and cancer-causing retrovirus mouse mammary tumor Virus (MMTV) . In experiments that lasted until the 1990s, MMTV was found to insert proviral DNA into specific regions of the mouse genome, inducing oncogene formation and mammary hyperplasia, and these genes were all later connected to Wnt signaling [141–143]. In addition, the growing clinical significance of Wnt signaling is also closely related to cancer, as the most well-known pathology that involves Wnt is familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) . In FAP, mutation in APC and stabilization of β-catenin results in increased colonic cell proliferation, yielding a presentation of colonic polyps associated with increased colorectal cancer risk [145–147]. In addition to MMTV studies and FAP being related to cancer, recent research has demonstrated that Wnt contributes to gastrointestinal, hematopoietic, breast, skin, brain, and colonic cancers .
With researchers investigating more on the connection between cancer and Wnt, iron has emerged as a prominent Wnt regulator in the context of proliferative pathologies. In studies using APC knockout cell lines Caco-2 and SW480, it was highlighted that growth on FeSO4-loaded media and hemin-loaded media, both rich in iron, increased Wnt signaling . Thus, iron-mediated Wnt signaling upregulation was demonstrated in cell lines that resembled FAP-associated cancer cells with the presence of APC knockout . Another recent study that investigated Nrf2 mutations and their association with hepatocellular carcinoma reported that alterations in iron homeostasis and subsequent Wnt signaling activation play a role in the occurrence and proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma . These studies show a potential contribution of iron in Wnt upregulation during cancerous pathologies.
Two recent reports revealed that iron chelators can reverse the Wnt activation during cancer. In the first study, a specific iron chelator HQBA inhibited Wnt signaling in a variety of cancer cell lines and inhibited growth of mammary tumors in MMTV-Wnt1 mouse models of Wnt-dependent breast cancer and in MMTV-PyMT mouse models of Wnt-independent breast cancer  indicating the plausible proliferative effects of iron both dependent and independent of Wnt signaling. The significance of this study with relation to iron is garnered from the fact that HQBA premixed with iron prior to cancer cell line exposure prevented its ability to reverse Wnt/β-catenin activation in several tissue-specific cancer cell lines confirming that the antitumor effect of HQBA is through iron chelation . A second study identified acyl hydrazones as inhibitors of Wnt/β-catenin signaling by chelating iron. Upon treatment with acyl hydrazones, intracellular iron was chelated, Wnt/β-catenin activation was reversed, and cell proliferation significantly decreased in human CRC cell lines SW480 and DID-1 . Taken together, these studies strongly suggest that excess iron upregulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in certain cancerous pathologies, and that iron chelation may be a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent cancer progression.
2.5.2. Neurodegenerative Disorders
The relationship between iron overload and aberrant Wnt signaling has been described in two studies that suggest excess iron in neuronal cells pathologically increases Wnt/β-catenin signaling. The first study discusses posthemorrhagic chronic hydrocephalus (PHCH), a potentially fatal medical condition often arising after an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) . PHCH is known to cause an increase in both cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) iron concentration  and ferritin content within the brain . Additionally, PHCH is characterized by fibrotic changes, which, in other tissues, are known to be linked to dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling [153, 154]. As iron accumulation and fibrotic changes are both major players in the progression of PHCH, authors investigated the therapeutic ability of the iron chelator deferoxamine (DFX) in the treatment of abnormal Wnt signaling in a PHCH model. The study revealed that by chelating excess iron from CSF and brain ferritin, DFX normalized the upregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling seen in PHCH after an IVH. This served to broadly improve PHCH occurrence and severity . Similarly, another recent study reported that upregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) could be normalized by DFX, leading to an increase in NPC differentiation and outgrowth . These studies indicate that iron overload is detrimental to the cells in neural tissues due to Wnt/β-catenin activation, which can be therapeutically resolved with DFX treatment.
2.5.3. Bone Remodeling
Iron [157, 158] and canonical Wnt signaling  are both important players in the maintenance of bone. While dietary iron is critical for healthy bone density in populations such as postmenopausal women , iron overload inducing diseases like β-thalassemia and hemochromatosis are often associated with decreased bone density and integrity . Indeed, chelation of iron with deferasirox has been shown to improve bone density in patients with β-thalassemia , suggesting that excess iron is detrimental to bone health. On the other hand, normal Wnt signaling is crucial for appropriate bone remodeling because Wnt signaling is involved in both osteoblast differentiation and osteoclastogenesis [159, 162, 163]. In addition, osteoporosis, a disease characterized by reduced bone density due to ineffective bone remodeling , is associated with both decreased Wnt signaling and oxidative stress . For these reasons, a recent article investigated iron-dependent Wnt signaling in bone marrow stromal cells differentiated towards osteoblasts . The study found that excess iron is detrimental to osteoblast differentiation, and that iron chelation using DFX can reverse the negative effects of iron overload in the same cells. Moreover, the results conclude that induction of Wnt5a expression by DFX is the mediator of this recovery, which occurs through the PI3K and NFAT pathways . These results indirectly indicate that excess iron reduces Wnt expression in bone; iron chelation by DFX treatment induces Wnt5a expression to recover the Wnt signaling. However, the study neither demonstrated directly that iron overload decreases Wnt signaling, nor showed that chelation of iron brings back Wnt signaling in the osteoblasts. A final consideration is that Wnt5a operates through a noncanonical Wnt pathway . Despite these limitations, we can still conclude that the induction of Wnt through DFX treatment is therapeutic for iron-overloaded osteoblasts. Moreover, recent research on an in vivo iron-induced osteoporotic rat model demonstrated similar reduction of Wnt signaling that was recovered with DFX in bone tissues . Another in vivo mouse study suggests that hepcidin-induced osteoporosis, mediated through iron overload, may also be targeted via inhibition of Forkhead box O3a to recover canonical Wnt signaling .
Interestingly, while iron overload leads to decreased activity of the Wnt pathway in osteoblasts, another study reported that iron overload induces ROS-mediated apoptosis and upregulation of the Wnt pathway in bone marrow mesenchymal cells of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes . This highlights the variation in Wnt signaling in response to iron overload between different cell types even within the context of a single tissue like bone.
2.5.4. Liver Injury
Chronic iron overload in hepatocytes, such as in cases of hemochromatosis, is associated with severe hepatic injury and cancer largely because of iron-induced steatosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress [171, 172]. Interestingly, liver-specific β-catenin knockout (KO) mice are known to have similar hepatic pathology resulting from factors such as fibrosis and oxidative stress [173, 174]. For these reasons, a recent study investigated the role of iron overload in hepatic pathology of liver-specific β-catenin KO mice . This study concluded that following iron overload, liver-specific β-catenin KO mice have increased steatohepatitis and fibrosis that is preceded by both inflammation and oxidative stress. Moreover, they demonstrate that treatment with an antioxidant can help prevent this disease progression. In effect, the absence of β-catenin exacerbates the detrimental effects of hepatic iron overload. The study also showed that iron overload led to a decrease in β-catenin in mice where it was not knocked out. This is postulated to be an initial protective mechanism, because these mice had less expression of Cype2e1, a β-catenin target associated with oxidative stress . However, the delicate nature of Wnt/β-catenin expression was proven to be detrimental in cases of β-catenin KO which increased inflammation and eventually lead to Cype2e1 reappearance, and, thus, further decrease in β-catenin due to prolonged iron overload could prove to be similarly detrimental in liver tissue. We recently showed that iron overload in normal mouse liver decreases Wnt pathway by suppressing Sirtuin 3 signaling . Thus, studies so far indicate that iron overload downregulates Wnt signaling in liver contributing towards the progression of liver fibrosis.
2.5.5. Ocular Diseases
Visual impairment is a national and a global health concern that impairs physical and mental health in affected individuals. The retina is one of the highest energy consuming organs in the body. Impaired metabolic changes in eye diseases often drive neuronal and vascular pathologies [177, 178]. The most prevalent retinal degenerative diseases are age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. Identification of risk factors and the molecular mechanisms that govern neuronal cell loss and vascular changes is of interest for translational researchers and clinicians to discover preventive and interventional therapeutics for retinal disorders of the eye.
Retina expresses many iron containing proteins like RPE65, an isomerohydrolase that converts all-trans-retinyl ester to 11-cis-retinol in the visual cycle , fatty acid desaturase, an enzyme involved in synthesis of membrane lipids 9 , and guanylate cyclase, involved in the synthesis of cGMP, a second messenger in the phototransduction pathway. So iron is critical for the retinal health. However, excess iron due to its prooxidant property induces oxidative stress  resulting in impaired retinal function. We have previously shown that excess iron alters retinal barrier integrity and accelerates the retinal cell loss by augmenting oxidative stress and inflammasome activation . Retinal iron accumulation has been reported in the human patients and mouse models of AMD and DR [4, 6]. Similarly, multiple studies have confirmed the pathogenic role of canonical Wnt signaling in the etiology of AMD [7, 8, 182] and DR [5, 183]. Recently, we reported a critical role for iron-induced oxidative stress in the activation of canonical Wnt pathway mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR-) alpha signaling in retina . A comprehensive understanding of what drives iron overload and the downstream Wnt signaling in an increasingly wide range of diseases would help in preventing the progression of diseases at an earlier stage in the future.
A multivariate genomic scan has revealed high levels of iron in the blood to be intimately associated with reduced healthspan . Also, intake of iron-rich diet and excess iron supplements are implicated in many age-related disorders. Iron-mediated oxidative stress induces inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction thereby playing a critical role in the progression of cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, osteoporosis, liver fibrosis and steatosis, and ocular diseases. Similarly, aberrant changes in the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway are a hallmark of cancer, diabetes mellitus, and other degenerative disorders. Elucidating the complex interplay between iron and Wnt pathway could lead to new insights into the mechanisms of disease progression and enrich our understanding of the aging biology. Control of body iron stores and Wnt inhibitors can thus serve as promising clinical targets to overcome the myriad ramifications of aging.
Data supporting this Review are from previously reported studies, which have been cited.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
A.A., A.M., M.M., and J.P.G wrote, edited, and finalized the manuscript. Austin Armstrong and Ashok Mandala contributed equally to this work.
The financial support from the National Eye Institute (R01-EY031008) and the American Heart Association (14SDG20510062) is kindly acknowledged.
D. N. Seril, J. Liao, K. L. K. Ho, A. Warsi, C. S. Yang, and G. Y. Yang, “Dietary iron supplementation enhances DSS-induced colitis and associated colorectal carcinoma development in mice,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1266–1278, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Ilsley, G. S. Belinsky, K. Guda et al., “Dietary iron promotes azoxymethane-induced colon tumors in mice,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 162–169, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Brookes, S. Hughes, F. E. Turner et al., “Modulation of iron transport proteins in human colorectal carcinogenesis,” Gut, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1449–1460, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
K. Chaudhary, W. Promsote, S. Ananth et al., “Iron overload accelerates the progression of diabetic retinopathy in association with increased retinal renin expression,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3025, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
Q. Chen and J. X. Ma, “Canonical Wnt signaling in diabetic retinopathy,” Vision Research, vol. 139, pp. 47–58, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
P. Hahn, A. H. Milam, and J. L. Dunaief, “Maculas affected by age-related macular degeneration contain increased chelatable iron in the retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch's membrane,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 8, pp. 1099–1105, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
T. Zhou, Y. Hu, Y. Chen et al., “The pathogenic role of the canonical Wnt pathway in age-related macular degeneration,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 4371–4379, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. Tuo, Y. Wang, R. Cheng et al., “Wnt signaling in age-related macular degeneration: human macular tissue and mouse model,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 13, p. 330, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
N. C. Andrews, “Disorders of iron metabolism,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 26, pp. 1986–1995, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
M. K. Georgieff, “The role of iron in neurodevelopment: fetal iron deficiency and the developing hippocampus,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1267–1271, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. K. Crownover and C. J. Covey, “Hereditary hemochromatosis,” American Family Physician, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 183–190, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
B. Halliwell and J. M. Gutteridge, “Oxygen toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition metals and disease,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1984.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Toyokuni, “Iron-induced carcinogenesis: the role of redox regulation,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 553–566, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
T. S. Koskenkorva-Frank, G. Weiss, W. H. Koppenol, and S. Burckhardt, “The complex interplay of iron metabolism, reactive oxygen species, and reactive nitrogen species: insights into the potential of various iron therapies to induce oxidative and nitrosative stress,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 65, pp. 1174–1194, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Urrutia, N. P. Mena, and M. T. Nunez, “The interplay between iron accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation during the execution step of neurodegenerative disorders,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 5, p. 38, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nakamura, T. Kawakami, N. Yamamoto et al., “Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by cellular labile iron,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 116–124, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
R. G. Ruddell, D. Hoang-le, J. M. Barwood et al., “Ferritin functions as a proinflammatory cytokine via iron-independent protein kinase C zeta/nuclear factor kappaB-regulated signaling in rat hepatic stellate cells,” Hepatology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 887–900, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rosário, G. Zandman-Goddard, E. G. Meyron-Holtz, D. P. D’Cruz, and Y. Shoenfeld, “The hyperferritinemic syndrome: macrophage activation syndrome, Still's disease, septic shock and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome,” BMC Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Gnana-Prakasam, P. M. Martin, B. A. Mysona, P. Roon, S. B. Smith, and V. Ganapathy, “Hepcidin expression in mouse retina and its regulation via lipopolysaccharide/Toll-like receptor-4 pathway independent of Hfe,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 411, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
K. Y. Yeh, M. Yeh, and J. Glass, “Hepcidin regulation of ferroportin 1 expression in the liver and intestine of the rat,” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 286, no. 3, pp. G385–G394, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
H. C. Korswagen, “Regulation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway by redox signaling,” Developmental Cell, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 687-688, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Funato, T. Michiue, M. Asashima, and H. Miki, “The thioredoxin-related redox-regulating protein nucleoredoxin inhibits Wnt-beta-catenin signalling through dishevelled,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 501–508, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
A. Vikram, Y. R. Kim, S. Kumar et al., “Canonical Wnt signaling induces vascular endothelial dysfunction via p66Shc-regulated reactive oxygen species,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2301–2309, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
K. Oguma, H. Oshima, M. Aoki et al., “Activated macrophages promote Wnt signalling through tumour necrosis factor-alpha in gastric tumour cells,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1671–1681, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
B. Ma and M. O. Hottiger, “Crosstalk between Wnt/β-Catenin and NF-κB signaling pathway during inflammation,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 7, p. 378, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Yoon, A. Ng, B. H. Kim, A. Bianco, R. J. Xavier, and S. J. Elledge, “Wnt signaling regulates mitochondrial physiology and insulin sensitivity,” Genes & Development, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 1507–1518, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Brookes, J. Boult, K. Roberts et al., “A role for iron in Wnt signalling,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 966–975, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
Z. Chen, J. Sun, T. Li et al., “Iron chelator-induced up-regulation of Ndrg1 inhibits proliferation and EMT process by targeting Wnt/β-catenin pathway in colon cancer cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 506, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2018.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Coombs, A. A. Schmitt, C. A. Canning et al., “Modulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and proliferation by a ferrous iron chelator with therapeutic efficacy in genetically engineered mouse models of cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 213–225, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nusse and H. E. Varmus, “Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome,” Cell, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 1982.View at: Google Scholar
F. Rijsewijk, M. Schuermann, E. Wagenaar, P. Parren, D. Weigel, and R. Nusse, “The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless,” Cell, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 649–657, 1987.View at: Google Scholar
A. Kusserow, K. Pang, C. Sturm et al., “Unexpected complexity of the Wnt gene family in a sea anemone,” Nature, vol. 433, no. 7022, pp. 156–160, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
A. P. McMahon and R. T. Moon, “Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis,” Cell, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1075–1084, 1989.View at: Google Scholar
H. Clevers and R. Nusse, “Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Disease,” Cell, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 1192–1205, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Logan and R. Nusse, “The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 20, pp. 781–810, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
F. J. Staal, F. Weerkamp, M. R. M. Baert et al., “Wnt target genes identified by DNA microarrays in immature CD34+ thymocytes regulate proliferation and cell adhesion,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 1099–1108, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Clevers, “Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Development and Disease,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 469–480, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Niehrs and S. P. Acebron, “Mitotic and mitogenic Wnt signalling,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2705–2713, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
B. Goldstein, H. Takeshita, K. Mizumoto, and H. Sawa, “Wnt signals can function as positional cues in establishing cell polarity,” Developmental Cell, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 391–396, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
Y. L. Huang and C. Niehrs, “Polarized Wnt signaling regulates ectodermal cell fate in Xenopus,” Developmental Cell, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 250–257, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
J. Schneider, A. A. Arraf, M. Grinstein, R. Yelin, and T. M. Schultheiss, “Wnt signaling orients the proximal-distal axis of chick kidney nephrons,” Development, vol. 142, no. 15, pp. 2686–2695, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
K. M. Loh, R. van Amerongen, and R. Nusse, “Generating cellular diversity and spatial form: Wnt signaling and the evolution of multicellular animals,” Developmental Cell, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 643–655, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
H. Sawa, “Control of cell polarity and asymmetric division in C. elegans,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 101, pp. 55–76, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
K. Tanaka, Y. Kitagawa, and T. Kadowaki, “Drosophila segment polarity gene product porcupine stimulates the posttranslational N-glycosylation of wingless in the endoplasmic reticulum,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 15, pp. 12816–12823, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
K. Willert, J. D. Brown, E. Danenberg et al., “Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6938, pp. 448–452, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
R. Takada, Y. Satomi, T. Kurata et al., “Monounsaturated fatty acid modification of Wnt protein: its role in Wnt secretion,” Developmental Cell, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 791–801, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
K. Hofmann, “A superfamily of membrane-bound O-acyltransferases with implications for wnt signaling,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 111-112, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
T. Kadowaki, E. Wilder, J. Klingensmith, K. Zachary, and N. Perrimon, “The segment polarity gene porcupine encodes a putative multitransmembrane protein involved in Wingless processing,” Genes & Development, vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 3116–3128, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
C. Y. Janda, D. Waghray, A. M. Levin, C. Thomas, and K. C. Garcia, “Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled,” Science, vol. 337, no. 6090, pp. 59–64, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. Yu, J. Chia, C. A. Canning, C. M. Jones, F. A. Bard, and D. M. Virshup, “WLS retrograde transport to the endoplasmic reticulum during Wnt secretion,” Developmental Cell, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 277–291, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
P. Herr and K. Basler, “Porcupine-mediated lipidation is required for Wnt recognition by Wls,” Developmental Biology, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 392–402, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
H. Komekado, H. Yamamoto, T. Chiba, and A. Kikuchi, “Glycosylation and palmitoylation of Wnt-3a are coupled to produce an active form of Wnt-3a,” Genes to Cells, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 521–534, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
X. Tang, Y. Wu, T. Y. Belenkaya et al., “Roles of N-glycosylation and lipidation in Wg secretion and signaling,” Developmental Biology, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
R. Najdi, K. Proffitt, S. Sprowl et al., “A uniform human Wnt expression library reveals a shared secretory pathway and unique signaling activities,” Differentiation, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 203–213, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
K. D. Proffitt and D. M. Virshup, “Precise regulation of porcupine activity is required for physiological Wnt signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 41, pp. 34167–34178, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
G. S. Coombs, J. Yu, C. A. Canning et al., “WLS-dependent secretion of WNT3A requires Ser 209 acylation and vacuolar acidification,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 19, pp. 3357–3367, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Moti, J. Yu, G. Boncompain, F. Perez, and D. M. Virshup, “Wnt traffic from endoplasmic reticulum to filopodia,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 2, article e0212711, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
F. Port, M. Kuster, P. Herr et al., “Wingless secretion promotes and requires retromer-dependent cycling of Wntless,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 178–185, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
T. Y. Belenkaya, Y. Wu, X. Tang et al., “The retromer complex influences Wnt secretion by recycling wntless from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network,” Developmental Cell, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
X. Franch-Marro, F. Wendler, S. Guidato et al., “Wingless secretion requires endosome-to-Golgi retrieval of Wntless/Evi/Sprinter by the retromer complex,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 170–177, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
M. Harterink, F. Port, M. J. Lorenowicz et al., “A SNX3-dependent retromer pathway mediates retrograde transport of the Wnt sorting receptor Wntless and is required for Wnt secretion,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 914–923, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
I. Gasnereau, P. Herr, P. Z. Chia, K. Basler, and P. A. Gleeson, “Identification of an endocytosis motif in an intracellular loop of Wntless protein, essential for its recycling and the control of Wnt protein signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 50, pp. 43324–43333, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
C. Korkut, B. Ataman, P. Ramachandran et al., “Trans-synaptic transmission of vesicular Wnt signals through Evi/Wntless,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 393–404, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
R. Nusse and H. Clevers, “Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities,” Cell, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 985–999, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Farin, I. Jordens, M. H. Mosa et al., “Visualization of a short-range Wnt gradient in the intestinal stem-cell niche,” Nature, vol. 530, no. 7590, pp. 340–343, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Mulligan, C. Fuerer, W. Ching, M. Fish, K. Willert, and R. Nusse, “Secreted Wingless-interacting molecule (Swim) promotes long-range signaling by maintaining Wingless solubility,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 370–377, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. Zecca, K. Basler, and G. Struhl, “Direct and long-range action of a wingless morphogen gradient,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 833–844, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
C. Alexandre, A. Baena-Lopez, and J. P. Vincent, “Patterning and growth control by membrane-tethered Wingless,” Nature, vol. 505, no. 7482, pp. 180–185, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Gross, V. Chaudhary, K. Bartscherer, and M. Boutros, “Active Wnt proteins are secreted on exosomes,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1036–1045, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. Behrens, J. P. von Kries, M. Kühl et al., “Functional interaction of beta-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6592, pp. 638–642, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
M. Molenaar, M. Van De Wetering, M. Oosterwegel et al., “XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates beta-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos,” Cell, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 391–399, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
P. Bhanot, M. Brink, C. H. Samos et al., “A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6588, pp. 225–230, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
C. E. Dann, J. C. Hsieh, A. Rattner, D. Sharma, J. Nathans, and D. J. Leahy, “Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains,” Nature, vol. 412, no. 6842, pp. 86–90, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
K. I. Pinson, J. Brennan, S. Monkley, B. J. Avery, and W. C. Skarnes, “An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 535–538, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
K. Tamai, M. Semenov, Y. Kato et al., “LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 530–535, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Gong, E. Bourhis, C. Chiu et al., “Wnt isoform-specific interactions with coreceptor specify inhibition or potentiation of signaling by LRP6 antibodies,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 9, article e12682, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
C. Niehrs, “The complex world of WNT receptor signalling,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 767–779, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
H. Aberle, A. Bauer, J. Stappert, A. Kispert, and R. Kemler, “Beta-catenin is a target for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 3797–3804, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
G. Chen and A. J. Courey, “Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression,” Gene, vol. 249, no. 1-2, pp. 1–16, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
X. He, M. Semenov, K. Tamai, and X. Zeng, “LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: arrows point the way,” Development, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 1663–1677, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
K. Tamai, X. Zeng, C. Liu et al., “A mechanism for Wnt coreceptor activation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 149–156, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
J. Mao, J. Wang, B. Liu et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway,” Molecular Cell, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 801–809, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
X. Zeng, K. Tamai, B. Doble et al., “A dual-kinase mechanism for Wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7069, pp. 873–877, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
G. Davidson, W. Wu, J. Shen et al., “Casein kinase 1 gamma couples Wnt receptor activation to cytoplasmic signal transduction,” Nature, vol. 438, no. 7069, pp. 867–872, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
H. Hikasa, J. Ezan, K. Itoh, X. Li, M. W. Klymkowsky, and S. Y. Sokol, “Regulation of TCF3 by Wnt-dependent phosphorylation during vertebrate axis specification,” Developmental Cell, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 521–532, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
W. Lee, S. Swarup, J. Chen, T. Ishitani, and E. M. Verheyen, “Homeodomain-interacting protein kinases (Hipks) promote Wnt/Wg signaling through stabilization of beta-catenin/Arm and stimulation of target gene expression,” Development, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 241–251, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
J. Willert, M. Epping, J. R. Pollack, P. O. Brown, and R. Nusse, “A transcriptional response to Wnt protein in human embryonic carcinoma cells,” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. He, A. B. Sparks, C. Rago et al., “Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5382, pp. 1509–1512, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
O. Tetsu and F. McCormick, “Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6726, pp. 422–426, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhang, J. P. Gaspard, and D. C. Chung, “Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by the Wnt and K-ras pathways in colonic neoplasia,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 6050–6054, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhou, Y. Li, S. Hao et al., “Multiple genes of the renin-angiotensin system are novel targets of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mori, H. Nagse, H. Ando et al., “Somatic mutations of the APC gene in colorectal tumors: mutation cluster region in the APC gene,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 229–233, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
Q. Xu, Y. Wang, A. Dabdoub et al., “Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 883–895, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
Ö. Uluçkan, M. Jimenez, S. Karbach et al., “Chronic skin inflammation leads to bone loss by IL-17-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling in osteoblasts,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 8, no. 330, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shi, B. Shu, R. Yang et al., “Wnt and Notch signaling pathway involved in wound healing by targeting c-Myc and Hes 1 separately,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 6, p. 120, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Harris, “Melanocyte regeneration in vitiligo requires WNT beneath their Wings,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 135, no. 12, pp. 2921–2923, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
C. Regazzetti, F. Joly, C. Marty et al., “Transcriptional analysis of vitiligo skin reveals the alteration of WNT pathway: a promising target for repigmenting vitiligo patients,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 135, no. 12, pp. 3105–3114, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
M. Zaidan, F. Stucker, B. Stengel et al., “Increased risk of solid renal tumors in lithium-treated patients,” Kidney International, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 184–190, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
O. Kazanskaya, A. Glinka, I. del Barco Barrantes, P. Stannek, C. Niehrs, and W. Wu, “R-Spondin 2 is a secreted activator of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and is required for Xenopus myogenesis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 525–534, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
X. Jiang, O. Charlat, R. Zamponi, Y. Yang, and F. Cong, “Dishevelled promotes Wnt receptor degradation through recruitment of ZNRF3/RNF43 E3 ubiquitin ligases,” Molecular Cell, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 522–533, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
K. S. Carmon, X. Gong, Q. Lin, A. Thomas, and Q. Liu, “R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 28, pp. 11452–11457, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
W. De Lau, N. Barker, T. Y. Low et al., “Lgr 5 homologues associate with Wnt receptors and mediate R-spondin signalling,” Nature, vol. 476, no. 7360, pp. 293–297, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
A. Glinka, C. Dolde, N. Kirsch et al., “LGR4 and LGR5 are R-spondin receptors mediating Wnt/β‐catenin and Wnt/PCP signalling,” EMBO Reports, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1055–1061, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xie, R. Zamponi, O. Charlat et al., “Interaction with both ZNRF3 and LGR4 is required for the signalling activity of R-spondin,” EMBO Reports, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1120–1126, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
W. de Lau, W. C. Peng, P. Gros, and H. Clevers, “The R-spondin/Lgr 5/Rnf43 module: regulator of Wnt signal strength,” Genes & Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 305–316, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
A. Ohlmann and E. R. Tamm, “Norrin: molecular and functional properties of an angiogenic and neuroprotective growth factor,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 243–257, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
T. Meitinger, A. Meindl, P. Bork et al., “Molecular modelling of the Norrie disease protein predicts a cystine knot growth factor tertiary structure,” Nature Genetics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 376–380, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
H. J. Junge, S. Yang, J. B. Burton et al., “TSPAN12 regulates retinal vascular development by promoting Norrin- but not Wnt-induced FZD4/beta-catenin signaling,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 299–311, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
M. B. Lai, C. Zhang, J. Shi et al., “TSPAN12 is a Norrin co-receptor that amplifies Frizzled 4 ligand selectivity and signaling,” Cell Reports, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 2809–2822, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
X. Ye, Y. Wang, H. Cahill et al., “Norrin, frizzled-4, and Lrp 5 signaling in endothelial cells controls a genetic program for retinal vascularization,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 285–298, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
T. H. Chang, F. L. Hsieh, M. Zebisch, K. Harlos, J. Elegheert, and E. Y. Jones, “Structure and functional properties of Norrin mimic Wnt for signalling with Frizzled 4, Lrp 5/6, and proteoglycan,” eLife, vol. 4, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
W. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. Liu et al., “PR55 alpha, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates PP2A-mediated beta-catenin dephosphorylation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 34, pp. 22649–22656, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
R. Nagel, C. le Sage, B. Diosdado et al., “Regulation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene by the miR-135 family in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 5795–5802, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schwabiuk, L. Coudiere, and D. C. Merz, “SDN-1/syndecan regulates growth factor signaling in distal tip cell migrations in C. elegans,” Developmental Biology, vol. 334, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
K. Dejima, S. Kang, S. Mitani, P. C. Cosman, and A. Chisholm, “Syndecan defines precise spindle orientation by modulating Wnt signaling in C. elegans,” Development, vol. 141, no. 22, pp. 4354–4365, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
K. Saied-Santiago, R. A. Townley, J. D. Attonito et al., “Coordination of heparan sulfate proteoglycans with Wnt signaling to control cellular migrations and positioning inCaenorhabditis elegans,” Genetics, vol. 206, no. 4, pp. 1951–1967, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kahn, “Can we safely target the WNT pathway?” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 513–532, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
C. Tapia-Rojas and N. C. Inestrosa, “Loss of canonical Wnt signaling is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1705–1710, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
A. Caricasole, A. Copani, F. Caraci et al., “Induction of Dickkopf-1, a negative modulator of the Wnt pathway, is associated with neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's brain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 26, pp. 6021–6027, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Purro, E. M. Dickins, and P. C. Salinas, “The secreted Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1 is required for Amyloid -Mediated Synaptic Loss,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 3492–3498, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kakugawa, P. F. Langton, M. Zebisch et al., “Notum deacylates Wnt proteins to suppress signalling activity,” Nature, vol. 519, no. 7542, pp. 187–192, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Giraldez, R. R. Copley, and S. M. Cohen, “HSPG modification by the secreted enzyme Notum shapes the Wingless morphogen gradient,” Developmental Cell, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 667–676, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhang, S. M. Cheong, N. G. Amado et al., “Notum is required for neural and head induction via Wnt deacylation, oxidation, and inactivation,” Developmental Cell, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 719–730, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Hsieh, L. Kodjabachian, M. L. Rebbert et al., “A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities,” Nature, vol. 398, no. 6726, pp. 431–436, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
C. Surmann-Schmitt, N. Widmann, U. Dietz et al., “Wif-1 is expressed at cartilage-mesenchyme interfaces and impedes Wnt3a-mediated inhibition of chondrogenesis,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 20, pp. 3627–3637, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Leyns, T. Bouwmeester, S. H. Kim, S. Piccolo, and E. M. De Robertis, “Frzb-1 is a secreted antagonist of Wnt signaling expressed in the Spemann organizer,” Cell, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 747–756, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
S. Wang, M. Krinks, K. Lin, F. P. Luyten, and M. Moos Jr., “Frzb, a secreted protein expressed in the Spemann organizer, binds and inhibits Wnt-8,” Cell, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 757–766, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
P. W. Finch, X. He, M. J. Kelley et al., “Purification and molecular cloning of a secreted, Frizzled-related antagonist of Wnt action,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 13, pp. 6770–6775, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
A. Yamamoto, T. Nagano, S. Takehara, M. Hibi, and S. Aizawa, “Shisa Promotes Head Formation through the Inhibition of Receptor Protein Maturation for the Caudalizing Factors, Wnt and FGF,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Kagermeier-Schenk, D. Wehner, G. Özhan-Kizil et al., “Waif1/5T4 Inhibits Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Activates Noncanonical Wnt Pathways by Modifying LRP6 Subcellular Localization,” Developmental Cell, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1129–1143, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shimomura, D. Agalliu, A. Vonica et al., “APCDD1 is a novel Wnt inhibitor mutated in hereditary hypotrichosis simplex,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7291, pp. 1043–1047, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhang, J. G. Abreu, C. Yokota et al., “Tiki 1 is required for head formation via Wnt cleavage-oxidation and inactivation,” Cell, vol. 149, no. 7, pp. 1565–1577, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. Korpal, E. S. Lee, G. Hu, and Y. Kang, “The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 22, pp. 14910–14914, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
S. T. Hashimi, J. A. Fulcher, M. H. Chang, L. Gov, S. Wang, and B. Lee, “MicroRNA profiling identifies miR-34a and miR-21 and their target genes JAG1 and WNT1 in the coordinate regulation of dendritic cell differentiation,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 404–414, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takahashi, Q. Chen, R. V. S. Rajala, and J. X. Ma, “MicroRNA-184 modulates canonical Wnt signaling through the regulation of frizzled-7 expression in the retina with ischemia-induced neovascularization,” FEBS Letters, vol. 589, no. 10, pp. 1143–1149, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. X. Hao, Y. Xie, Y. Zhang et al., “ZNRF3 promotes Wnt receptor turnover in an R-spondin-sensitive manner,” Nature, vol. 485, no. 7397, pp. 195–200, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
B. K. Koo, M. Spit, I. Jordens et al., “Tumour suppressor RNF43 is a stem-cell E3 ligase that induces endocytosis of Wnt receptors,” Nature, vol. 488, no. 7413, pp. 665–669, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. Behrens, B. A. Jerchow, M. Würtele et al., “Functional interaction of an Axin homolog, conductin, with beta-catenin, APC, and GSK3beta,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5363, pp. 596–599, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Jho, T. Zhang, C. Domon, C. K. Joo, J. N. Freund, and F. Costantini, “Wnt/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling induces the transcription of Axin 2, a negative regulator of the signaling pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1172–1183, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
R. Nusse and H. Varmus, “Three decades of Wnts: a personal perspective on how a scientific field developed,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 2670–2684, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
C. Dickson, R. Smith, S. Brookes, and G. Peters, “Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: proviral activation of a cellular gene in the common integration region int-2,” Cell, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 529–536, 1984.View at: Google Scholar
H. Roelink, E. Wagenaar, S. L. Da Silva, and R. Nusse, “Wnt-3, a gene activated by proviral insertion in mouse mammary tumors, is homologous to int-1/Wnt-1 and is normally expressed in mouse embryos and adult brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4519–4523, 1990.View at: Google Scholar
D. Gallahan and R. Callahan, “Mammary tumorigenesis in feral mice: identification of a new int locus in mouse mammary tumor virus (Czech II)-induced mammary tumors,” Journal of Virology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 66–74, 1987.View at: Google Scholar
N. Ghosh, U. Hossain, A. Mandal, and P. C. Sil, “The Wnt signaling pathway: a potential therapeutic target against cancer,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1443, no. 1, pp. 54–74, 2019.View at: Google Scholar
N. S. Fearnhead, M. P. Britton, and W. F. Bodmer, “The ABC of APC,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 721–733, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Morin, A. B. Sparks, V. Korinek et al., “Activation of β-Catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in β-Catenin or APC,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5307, pp. 1787–1790, 1997.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. Caldwell, C. E. Jones, A. M. Ashley et al., “Wnt signalling in adenomas of familial adenomatous polyposis patients,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 910–917, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. Tao, Y. Krutsenko, A. Moghe et al., “Nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 and β‐Catenin coactivation in hepatocellular cancer: biological and therapeutic implications,” Hepatology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 741–759, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Song, T. Christova, S. Perusini et al., “Wnt inhibitor screen reveals iron dependence of β-Catenin signaling in cancers,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 24, pp. 7628–7639, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Whitelaw, “Intraventricular haemorrhage and posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: pathogenesis, prevention and future interventions,” Seminars in Neonatology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
J. Wu, Y. Hua, R. F. Keep, T. Nakamura, J. T. Hoff, and G. Xi, “Iron and iron-handling proteins in the brain after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2964–2969, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
Z. Chen, C. Gao, Y. Hua, R. F. Keep, K. Muraszko, and G. Xi, “Role of iron in brain injury after intraventricular hemorrhage,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 465–470, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
P. Cisternas, C. P. Vio, and N. C. Inestrosa, “Role of Wnt signaling in tissue fibrosis, lessons from skeletal muscle and kidney,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 510–522, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
C. G. Miao, Y. Y. Yang, X. He et al., “Wnt signaling in liver fibrosis: progress, challenges and potential directions,” Biochimie, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2326–2335, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
H. Meng, F. Li, R. Hu et al., “Deferoxamine alleviates chronic hydrocephalus after intraventricular hemorrhage through iron chelation and Wnt1/Wnt3a inhibition,” Brain Research, vol. 1602, pp. 44–52, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ziaei, M. R. P. Ardakani, M. S. Hashemi et al., “Acute course of deferoxamine promoted neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells through suppression of Wnt/β-catenin pathway: A novel efficient protocol for neuronal differentiation,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 590, pp. 138–144, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Harris, L. B. Houtkooper, V. A. Stanford et al., “Dietary iron is associated with bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal women,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 3598–3602, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
S. I. Katsumata, R. Katsumata-Tsuboi, M. Uehara, and K. Suzuki, “Severe iron deficiency decreases both bone formation and bone resorption in rats,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 238–243, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
R. Baron and M. Kneissel, “WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 179–192, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
V. Jeney, “Clinical impact and cellular mechanisms of iron overload-associated bone loss,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, p. 77, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
M. Casale, S. Citarella, A. Filosa et al., “Endocrine function and bone disease during long-term chelation therapy with deferasirox in patients with β-thalassemia major,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 1102–1106, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gong, R. B. Slee, N. Fukai et al., “LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 513–523, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
K. Maeda, Y. Kobayashi, N. Udagawa et al., “Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 405–412, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, “Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 569–573, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
S. C. Manolagas, “From estrogen-centric to aging and oxidative stress: a revised perspective of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 266–300, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
U. Baschant, M. Rauner, E. Balaian et al., “Wnt5a is a key target for the pro-osteogenic effects of iron chelation on osteoblast progenitors,” Haematologica, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 1499–1507, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Mikels and R. Nusse, “Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits β-Catenin–TCF signaling depending on receptor context,” PLoS Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, article e115, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xu, R. Yu, X. Zhu et al., “Iron-chelating agent can maintain bone homeostasis disrupted by iron overload by upregulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 8256261, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
G. Li, H. Zhang, J. Wu et al., “Hepcidin deficiency causes bone loss through interfering with the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway via Forkhead box O3a,” Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, vol. 23, pp. 67–76, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Liu et al., “Iron overload impairs bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells from higher-risk MDS patients by regulating the ROS-related Wnt/beta-catenin pathway,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2020, Article ID 8855038, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
X. Huang, “Iron overload and its association with cancer risk in humans: evidence for iron as a carcinogenic metal,” Mutation Research, vol. 533, no. 1-2, pp. 153–171, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
L. Valenti, A. L. Fracanzani, P. Dongiovanni et al., “Iron depletion by phlebotomy improves insulin resistance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hyperferritinemia: evidence from a case-control study,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1251–1258, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
P. K. Awuah, B. H. Rhieu, S. Singh, A. Misse, and S. P. S. Monga, “β-Catenin loss in hepatocytes promotes hepatocellular cancer after diethylnitrosamine and phenobarbital administration to mice,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 6, article e39771, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. F. Zhang, X. Tan, G. Zeng et al., “Conditional beta-catenin loss in mice promotes chemical hepatocarcinogenesis: role of oxidative stress and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha/phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling,” Hepatology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 954–965, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Preziosi, S. Singh, E. V. Valore et al., “Mice lacking liver-specific β-catenin develop steatohepatitis and fibrosis after iron overload,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 360–369, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mandala, W. J. Chen, A. Armstrong et al., “PPARα agonist fenofibrate attenuates iron-induced liver injury in mice by modulating the Sirt 3 and β-catenin signaling,” American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 321, no. 3, pp. G262–G269, 2021.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Joyal, M. L. Gantner, and L. E. H. Smith, “Retinal energy demands control vascular supply of the retina in development and disease: the role of neuronal lipid and glucose metabolism,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 64, pp. 131–156, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
S. Selvam, T. Kumar, and M. Fruttiger, “Retinal vasculature development in health and disease,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 63, pp. 1–19, 2018.View at: Google Scholar
G. Moiseyev, Y. Chen, Y. Takahashi, B. X. Wu, and J. X. Ma, “RPE65 is the isomerohydrolase in the retinoid visual cycle,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 35, pp. 12413–12418, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
H. Chen, T. J. Lukas, N. Du, G. Suyeoka, and A. H. Neufeld, “Dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium with age: increased iron decreases phagocytosis and lysosomal activity,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1895–1902, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
B. S. Rogers, R. C. Symons, K. Komeima et al., “Differential sensitivity of cones to iron-mediated oxidative damage,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 438–445, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
A. Vallee, Y. LeCarpentier, R. Vallee, R. Guillevin, and J. N. Vallée, “Circadian Rhythms in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Key Role of the Canonical WNT/β-Catenin Pathway,” International journal of molecular sciences, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 820, 2020.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Y. Hu, T. Zhou et al., “Activation of the Wnt pathway plays a pathogenic role in diabetic retinopathy in humans and animal models,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 2676–2685, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
A. Mandala, A. Armstrong, B. Girresch et al., “Fenofibrate prevents iron induced activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin and oxidative stress signaling in the retina,” NPJ Aging And Mechanisms Of Disease, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 12, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Timmers, J. F. Wilson, P. K. Joshi, and J. Deelen, “Multivariate genomic scan implicates novel loci and haem metabolism in human ageing,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 3570, 2020.View at: Google Scholar