Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2017, Article ID 6713012, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6713012
Research Article

The Development of a Measurement Tool Evaluating Knowledge Related to Sensory Processing among Graduate Occupational Therapy Students: A Process Description

1Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA
2University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Bryan M. Gee; ude.usi@ayrbeeg

Received 23 July 2016; Revised 24 October 2016; Accepted 29 November 2016; Published 11 January 2017

Academic Editor: Claudia Hilton

Copyright © 2017 Bryan M. Gee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Reynolds, R. Watling, A. L. Zapletal, and T. May-Benson, “Sensory integration in entry-level occupational therapy education,” in Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly Newsletter, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education, “Blueprint for the future of entry-level education in occupational therapy,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 186–203, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. American Occupational Therapy Association, Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE) Standards and Interpretive Guide, American Occupational Therapy Association, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2012.
  4. S. Reynolds, R. Watling, A. L. Zapletal, and T. May-Benson, “Sensory integration in entry-level occupational therapy education: a preliminary report,” American Occupational Therapy Association, Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Quarterly Newsletter, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. V. A. Green, K. A. Pituch, J. Itchon, A. Choi, M. O'Reilly, and J. Sigafoos, “Internet survey of treatments used by parents of children with autism,” Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 70–84, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. C. Schaaf and Z. Mailloux, Clinician's Guide for Implementing Ayres Sensory Integration: Promoting Participation for Children with Autism, AOTA Press, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Miller, Sensational Kids: Hope and Help for Children with Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD), Perigee Books, New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  8. M. Corcoran, “AJOT and the AOTA centennial vision,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 267–268, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. A. B. Schell and J. W. Schell, Clinical and Professional Reasoning in Occupational Therapy, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2007.
  10. M. E. Neistadt, “Teaching clinical reasoning as a thinking frame,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. L. Crabtree, “The end of occupational therapy,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 52, pp. 205–214, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Higgs and M. Jones, “Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces,” in Clinical Reasoning in the Healing Professions, J. Higgs, M. Jones, S. Loftus, and N. Christensen, Eds., pp. 3–17, Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3rd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  13. D. A. Schon, How Professionals Think in Action, The Reflective Practitioner, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  14. J. N. Scanlan and N. Hancock, “Online discussions develop students' clinical reasoning skills during fieldwork,” Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 401–408, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. P. Norris and R. H. Ennis, Evaluating Critical Thinking. The Practitioners' Guide to Teaching Thinking Series, Critical Thinking Press and Software, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA, 1989.
  16. D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–23, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Murphy, “An instrument to support thinking critically about critical thinking in online asynchronous discussions,” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 295–318, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Avi-Itzhak and A. Krauss, “An outcome assessment for evaluating occupational therapy students' proficiency and skills required for passing the NBCOT computer-based certification test,” Journal of Allied Health, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 81–87, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. A. McCarron and F. D. Amico, “The impact of problem-based learning on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy education,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Coker, “Effects of an experiential learning program on the clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills of occupational therapy students,” Journal of Allied Health, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 280–286, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. B. Royeen, K. Mu, K. Barrett, and A. J. Luebben, “Pilot investigation: evaluation of clinical reflection and reasoning before and after workshop intervention,” in Innovations in Occupational Therapy Education, P. Crist, Ed., pp. 107–114, American Occupational Therapy Association, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. A. Facione, N. C. Facione, S. W. Blohm, and C. A. F. Giancarlo, The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: CCTST, California Academic Press, 2002.
  23. A. W. Mitchell and R. E. Batorski, “A study of critical reasoning in online learning: application of the occupational performance process model,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 134–153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Charlin and C. van der Vleuten, “Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty the script concordance approach,” Evaluation & the Health Professions, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 304–319, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. A. Creel, “Chat rooms and level II fieldwork,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Thomas and C. Storr, “WebCT in occupational therapy clinical education: implementing and evaluating a tool for peer learning and interaction,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 162–179, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Wooster, “An exploratory study of web-based supports for occupational therapy students during level II fieldwork,” Occupational Therapy in Health Care, vol. 18, no. 1-2, pp. 21–29, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Trujillo and J. Painter, “The effectiveness of discussion board usage for occupational therapy fieldwork II students,” Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, vol. 5, pp. 80–88, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  29. T. Poulton, E. Conradi, S. Kavia, J. Round, and S. Hilton, “The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning,” Medical Teacher, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 752–758, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. Gee, Exploring the Effectiveness of an E-Learning Module for Graduate Level First Year Occupational Therapy Students, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA, 2015.
  31. D. S. Bialer and L. J. Miller, No Longer A SECRET: Unique Common Sense Strategies for Children with Sensory or Motor Challenges, Sensory World, Arlington, Tex, USA, 2011.
  32. B. M. Gee and T. W. Peterson, “Changes in caregiver knowledge and perceived competency following group education about sensory processing disturbances: an exploratory study,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 338–345, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  33. L. G. Portney and M. P. Watkins, Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2015.
  34. B. Williams, T. Brown, R. Scholes, J. French, and F. Archer, “Can interdisciplinary clinical DVD simulations transform clinical fieldwork education for paramedic, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and nursing students?” Journal of Allied Health, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. P. Bethea, D. C. Castillo, and N. Harvison, “Use of simulation in occupational therapy education: way of the future?” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 68, supplement 2, pp. S32–S39, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Tomlin, “The use of interactive video client simulation scores to predict clinical performance of occupational therapy students,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus