Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Occupational Therapy International
Volume 2018, Article ID 7412686, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7412686
Review Article

Occupational Therapy for Adults with Overweight and Obesity: Mapping Interventions Involving Occupational Therapists

1The Research Initiative of Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, The University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9a, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
2The Research Unit for Physical Activity and Health at Work, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, The University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark

Correspondence should be addressed to Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen; kd.uds.htlaeh@draagloss

Received 23 March 2018; Revised 30 June 2018; Accepted 23 August 2018; Published 30 October 2018

Academic Editor: Lynette Mackenzie

Copyright © 2018 Svetlana Solgaard Nielsen and Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Worldwide obesity rates are increasing. The effectiveness of occupational therapy in overweight and obese adults has not yet been clarified. Objectives. The scoping review aimed at examining the evidence on interventions involving occupational therapists in the treatment of adults with overweight and obesity. Methods. Data on interventions involving occupational therapists and reporting on lifestyle-related outcomes in overweight and obese adults was extracted from the databases Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase, including hand and reference search. The scoping review methodology of Arksey and O’Malley was used. Conclusions were based on numerical and narrative analysis. Results. Thirteen articles reporting on eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Several studies showed significant weight loss. However, the studies possessed high heterogeneity and showed insufficient explication of the role and contribution of occupational therapy to the outcomes. Conclusions. The interventions with involvement of occupational therapists were suggested to help short-term weight loss. Occupational therapists contributed to the outcomes with a holistic approach, educating on the role of activity, providing technological support, and promoting enjoyment of being active. There is a need for further documentation of the effectiveness, role, and contributions of occupational therapy in the treatment of overweight and obese adults in all settings.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of obesity has increased continuously since 1980 and has even doubled in more than 70 countries [1]. Obesity relates to numerous health issues, such as cardiovascular disease, several types of cancer, and diabetes mellitus [2]. Besides resulting in health problems, obesity can impede engagement in meaningful daily activities and lower one’s opportunities in education, leisure time, and work [35].

Lifestyle interventions, dieting, pharmacology, and bariatric surgery have been named as the methods typically used today in the treatment of adults with overweight and obesity [69]. The evidence has recommended combining a calorie-reduced diet (with the energy deficit of at least 500 kcal/day) and physical activity increased to 30 min in most weekdays, as the first-line option in obesity treatment [68]. An intervention ought to include behavioral treatment as the third component facilitating adherence to diet and physical activity recommendations, to be called “a lifestyle intervention” [6].

There is strong evidence for intensive lifestyle interventions which vary up to 6 months, for clinically significant weight loss (5–10% of initial weight, approximately 8 kg) [6]. There is moderate evidence for lifestyle interventions in intermediate-term weight loss (weight reduction with another 8 kg during the next 6 months of intervention) [6]. Although lifestyle interventions of duration ≥ 1 year have been associated with weight regain, they have shown a higher effect on weight loss compared to standard care, e.g., advice [6]. The interventions of high-frequency contacts with health professionals (≥14 contacts in total for the first 3 to 6 months) have achieved the best effect [6]. Single-component approaches have been found less effective than multicomponent approaches [6, 7]. The optimal duration of lifestyle interventions leading to clinically significant weight loss and optimal strategy for additional weight loss beyond the initial 6 months of intervention, as well as long-term approaches (2–5 years) to the maintenance of lost weight, are still to be clarified [6, 8, 10].

Researchers point at the need for all health professionals to be upskilled for effective management of the “obesity epidemic” [11, 12]. Occupational therapists possess key skills that help to promote health and to establish persistent lifestyle changes through participation in activities of choice, prevention of occupational deprivation, and increase in the perceived quality of life [3, 13]. However, the evidence of the effectiveness of occupational therapy in overweight and obese clients is scarce [1417]. Several nonsystematic reviews have outlined the role, main target populations, domains, and strategies for occupational therapy addressing individuals with overweight and obesity [14, 17, 18]. Neither a systematic review nor a systematic investigation of the scope of occupational therapy interventions in the field has yet been conducted [14, 17, 18]. This study aimed at examining the evidence from studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions involving occupational therapists in the treatment of adults with overweight and obesity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

The current review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five steps of scoping review procedure with the advantage of methodological improvements done by Davis et al., Levac et al., Colquhoun et al., Tricco et al., and Peters et al. These are (1) defining the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection and inclusion; (4) data charting; and (5) collating, summarising, and reporting of the results [1925]. The 6th step of Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review procedure, consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component, will be reflected in Discussion. This study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [26].

2.2. Defining the Research Questions

(i)What characterizes the interventions involving occupational therapists identified in the current evidence?(ii)Which significant improvements in lifestyle and health behavior were made by adults with overweight and obesity who participated in interventions involving occupational therapists?

The search strategy with inclusion and exclusion criteria was developed using the PCC model (population, concept, and context) [24]. The three-fold focus in the search strategy was related to the following: adults with overweight or obesity, interventions that involved occupational therapists, and intervention outcomes showing changes in lifestyle and health behavior.

2.3. Identifying Relevant Studies

A three-step literature search was performed from February to April 2017 (last search: 22 April 2017) to identify studies that reported outcomes of interventions for adults with overweight or obesity, where occupational therapists were involved. Firstly, an initial literature search was made in PubMed to identify relevant keywords, synonyms, word modifications, and thesaurus terms, according to the PCC criteria in this study [24]. Secondly, the database-specific searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library using block search strategy. The thesaurus terminology of each database and words, e.g., “occupational therapy”, “occupational therapists”, “obesity”, “obese”, “overweight”, “bariatric”, “lifestyle”, “health behaviour”, “habits”, and “activities of daily living”, as well as their terminological variations, were included. Truncations were used when relevant. No time restrictions were used. Thirdly, additional publications of relevance were searched manually in reference lists. Google Scholar and Bibliotek.dk were inspected using the terms “occupational therapy” and “obesity” and “occupational therapy” and “overweight”. Unpublished items on interventions of interest were searched in ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Websites of organisations with expert knowledge in the field, the University of Southern California (USA), and Ergoterapeutforeningen (the Labour-Union for Occupational therapists in Denmark) were inspected. The second search was done in OTseeker on 22 April 2017. No further articles were found. The software reference program Endnote X8 was used to organise search results.

2.4. Study Selection and Inclusion

Selection of articles eligible for inclusion was guided by inclusion and exclusion criteria according to the research questions. The articles were selected in agreement with the authors. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) interventions in all settings addressing lifestyle in overweight or obese adults > 18 years; (ii) identified occupational therapists’ involvement in the interventions; (iii) reported outcomes on the effectiveness of the interventions between participants before and after or between groups; and (iv) both articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and “grey literature,” e.g., treatment reports, evaluations, and public presentations. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) parents to children with overweight or obesity problems; (ii) pregnant women; (iii) articles written in languages other than English, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, or German; and (iv) expert opinions, editorials, commentaries, interviews, conference thesis, lectures, periodicals, or abstracts.

A selection form was developed to reduce the risk of selecting bias and support the iterative approach to the selection process [21] (Figure 1). The selection form assisted the decision-making process upon data screening. The articles that did not fit into the selection form were excluded. Both authors were involved in all parts of the review process. An agreement was achieved upon discussion between the authors.

Figure 1: Selection form.
2.5. Data Charting

The data charting form was developed and pilot-tested on a sample of three of the included articles in terms of further justifications. The final data charting form included information on the first author, year of publication, country of origin, publication source, study design, methods, sample size, the participants’ age and gender, intervention’s duration and content, comparator, and the role and contributions of occupational therapy to outcomes. Descriptive statistics on study results and effects at baseline, post intervention, and follow-up (when available) and values were extracted and provided in the data extraction form.

2.6. Collating, Summarising, and Reporting the Results

Analysis of the extent, nature, and composition of the included studies was conducted. Infographics were applied to illustrate the results, supported by narrative comments. Nonnumerical findings were subject to qualitative thematic analysis. A tabular summary of the results across the reviewed studies was made in terms of mapping the evidence for answering the research question.

3. Results

The process for literature search, assessment, and selection is specified in the flowchart [27] (Figure 2). Initially, 582 records were sourced from the database search. Additional articles () were found through reference lists (). After removing the duplicates (), the inclusion of the articles () was made in two steps. All titles and abstracts were screened for relevance on the topic and excluded if they were not relevant for occupational therapy and obesity or overweight in the title, abstract, or keywords (). The remaining articles () were inspected in full-text.

Figure 2: Flowchart, according to PRISMA [27].

A total of 13 articles representing 11 studies describing interventions addressing adults with overweight and obesity, where occupational therapists were involved, were found eligible for this review.

The articles () representing different phases of the same study () were considered one study, in terms to avoid repetitive descriptions of the identical approach [2831].

3.1. The Sample Characteristics

Three of the identified studies were RCT’s [2832], and three were quasiexperiments [3335]. The rest () were pre-/posttest studies of single cohorts [3638] or single cases [39] or case groups [40] (Table 1).

Table 1: Data extraction form.

Over the half of the included studies () addressed individuals with mental problems (range 22–71 years old) [28, 29, 3336, 39]. One study addressed diabetes patients (age range 37–87) [32] and another cancer patients (age range 42–79) [38]. Study samples of the participants who completed the interventions varied from 2 to 91 participants [2831, 39, 40]. Many studies had high dropout rates 30–38% [28, 29, 32, 33, 37]. However, one study had only a few dropouts [30, 31], and another no dropout at all [35]. The interventions were composed of the following: 1-phase intervention (), 2-phase intervention (), and 3-phase intervention () (Figure 3). Of the 2-phase intervention, two studies had an active maintenance phase that included ongoing treatment [30, 31, 35]. Thus, there were short-term (≤6 months of active treatment) (), intermediate-term (>6 months and ≤12 months of active treatment) (), and long-term weight loss interventions (>1 year of active treatment) () in the sample [6].

Figure 3: Interventions’ phases and length.

The extent of occupational therapy involvement varied across the identified interventions. Two studies were solely occupational therapist-led [36, 39]. In another two studies, occupational therapists collaborated with other health professionals, either psychiatric nurses [34] or physical therapists [37]. The remaining studies () were multidisciplinary interventions. The multidisciplinary profile in five studies included nurses, psychologists, dietitians, podiatrists, fitness instructors, sports scientists, or social workers [2831, 33, 35, 38]. In two studies, the professionals involved, besides the occupational therapists, remained unspecified [32, 40]. The levels of transparency of occupational therapy engagement varied from reporting on the involvement of occupational therapists in several intervention processes, e.g., planning, execution, team supervision, and intervention management [2831, 3336, 3840], to limited involvement, e.g., executing or team supervision only [32, 37].

Various attempts to promote the healthy lifestyle and health behavior changes in overweight and obese adults were described in the identified studies. Several studies from the sample did not declare any specific occupational therapy role and contribution. However, the studies operated with methods relevant to occupational therapy. Intervention components (as focus fields in an intervention) and intervention strategies (as methods of impact on the focus fields) across the studies were synthesized and differentiated according to the level of transparency in the declaration of the occupational therapy role and contribution (Table 2).

Table 2: Intervention components (a) and intervention strategies (b) presented in the included studies.

Regarding the major components of lifestyle interventions in obesity treatment described in the international guidelines in treatment of overweight and obesity, one-component (physical activity, ) [35, 39, 40], two-component (physical activity and cognitive techniques, ) [32], and three-component (diet, physical activity and CBT-elements, ) [2831, 33, 34, 3638] studies were represented in the included articles.

3.2. The Reported Outcomes

All the studies aimed at making an impact on body weight in populations with obesity and/or risk of metabolic complications. Six studies (55%) were directly addressing weight change, while the rest focused on change in overall health behavior () [37], self-management of disease symptoms () [32, 38], or sedentary lifestyle () [35, 39]. Weight loss, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were the most commonly used outcomes across the sample (Table 3).

Table 3: Summary of the reported outcomes.
3.2.1. Weight Loss

Eight studies from the sample used weight loss to evaluate the intervention effect, and all found improvements [2836, 40]. Significant body weight reductions were identified in short- [2830, 32, 33, 36, 40], intermediate- [31], and long-term [34, 35]. The weight loss was most frequently achieved through a comprehensive approach combining physical activity, dieting and behavioral treatment [2831, 33] compared to controls or in-group [36]. However, the combination of physical activity and behavioral treatment [32], as well as stand-alone physical activity or behavioral treatment [34, 35, 40], could also result in significant weight loss.

3.2.2. BMI

BMI was assessed in five of the included in this research studies [30, 31, 33, 34, 38, 40]. Three studies identified a significant effect on BMI at intervention discharge [30, 33, 40], and one at the end of the maintenance phase [31]. Thus, one RCT found significant effects on BMI in short-term and intermediate-term [30, 31]. However, mixed results in different subgroups [40] and no significant results on BMI [38] were also found.

3.2.3. Waist Circumference

A significant effect on waist circumference was experienced by the participants in two studies, one RCT and one quasiexperiment [30, 31, 33]. Waist circumference as an effect measure was chosen less frequently than changes in weight across the sample. The effects on waist circumference were maintained up to one year.

3.2.4. Other Outcomes

Most studies used multiple outcome measures, such as a combination of objective anthropometric, biochemical, and physical variables and self-reported psychosocial variables. Both significant and nonsignificant findings were represented.

4. Discussion

The current study aimed at examining the evidence from studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions involving occupational therapists in the treatment of adults with overweight and obesity. The most reviewed interventions were composed as multicomponent and multidisciplinary, involved graduated health professionals, offered frequent client contacts, and used elevated daily physical activity combined with better nutrition control, as recommended by the evidence on managing lifestyle changes in overweight and obese adults [1114]. However, only seven interventions would fully match the definition of “comprehensive lifestyle interventions” having three components—physical activity, dieting, and cognitive behavioral therapy (or its elements) [11]. The sample did not sufficiently match the clinical recommendations to intervention length and reduction of energy intake, while the daily range of physical activity planned was not apparent [6, 8, 9].

4.1. Treatment Effects
4.1.1. Weight Loss

Comprehensive lifestyle interventions having an impact on physical activity, diet, and behavior are recognized in other evidence as the most effective treatment aimed at weight loss in overweight and obese adults [6]. Overall evidence found three-component lifestyle interventions resulting in significant weight loss at the average follow-up of three years, with an average weight reduction of −2.2 kg [41]. Dieting in combination with physical activity brought better results in weight loss than physical activity alone [42, 43].

The current research found no significant improvement in weight from education as the only intervention form, which partly supports the importance of the comprehensive approach [38]. However, a number of interventions from the sample showing significant improvements in weight were not comprehensive per definition, as they had no dietary component included. The only intervention from the sample comparable in its duration (min. of 3 years) with the other evidence showed weight reduction above the average for lifestyle interventions in general [34].

The long-term (>1 year) effect on weight loss was found in two one-component interventions from the sample [34, 35]. They both had a high level of user-involvement and flexibility in planning, according to the participants’ actual needs. We believe that the core principles of occupational therapy, such as client-centeredness and promotion of active participation, as well as the setting of realistic goals and using of meaningful occupations, might be the factors that allowed significant weight loss, despite less comprehensive intervention composition. As the two studies were both based on long-term contacts with occupational therapists and their collaborators, the results also supported the positive impact on weight loss of prolonged and frequent contacts with educated healthcare professionals [6, 7].

Only three interventions operated with the clinically significant weight loss measure (≥5% of the initial body weight) [28, 29, 34, 36]. Clinically significant weight loss was considered moderate and realistic to achieve, as well as being an important indicator for the satisfactory level of weight loss concerning human metabolic function and ability to prevent diabetes and hypertension [6, 7, 9]. Being aware of that would prevent unrealistic goals and underpin the favourable effects of weight loss starting with low weight loss levels [44]. Many other health science studies assessed clinically significant weight loss, and the parameter became an inclusion criterion for a systematic review on the topic [42].

The little focus on clinically significant weight loss in the identified interventions could be the consequence of the paucity in quantitative research on the topic, particularly RCTs, in the field of occupational therapy. We suppose that attention to clinically significant weight loss in occupational therapy interventions will become more common, as soon as further investigations of strong methodology emerge in the field, urging higher comparability of the results.

4.1.2. Weight Regain

One study from the sample (an RCT with active treatment period = 6 months) showed nonsignificant weight regain in the intervention group at follow-up (12 months post recruitment/6 months post intervention) [29]. On the other hand, three interventions with active treatment duration ≥ 1 year were effective in the maintenance of the initial weight loss at the final assessment [30, 31, 34, 35]. The current research showed that sufficient weight maintenance can be achieved by 1-year continuous treatment, inclusive maintenance phase [30, 31].

Lifestyle interventions longer than 1 year were associated with weight regain [6]. Weight maintenance phases were recommended not to be ended earlier than ≥1 year from baseline [42]. However, maintenance phase duration > 1 year was not associated with a better effect on maintenance of the initial weight loss and its percentage [42]. Weight regain to preintervention level at 5 years post intervention was considered common for weight loss interventions and independent of BMI or metabolic status [7]. Weight regain could though be prevented by adapting individual weight maintenance strategies including continued healthy eating, high-level physical activity on regular basis, continued contacts with healthcare professionals (in any format), self-monitoring of body weight (e.g. once a week), and environmental support [7]. Additionally, maintenance of lost weight was found to require another approach, different from that for the initial weight loss [45].

While our findings supported the evidence, no interventions from the sample assessed the effect at 5 years post intervention. However, the two studies with the longest treatment durations (20–48 months) proved to achieve sufficient weight maintenance at the final assessment showing occupational therapy potentially capable of weight maintenance up to 4 years of treatment [34, 35]. The interventions were mainly based on either behavioral treatment or recreational outdoor physical activities.

From the above-named treatment elements important for weight maintenance, the two studies had their regularity, continued contact with occupational therapists, and environmental support (during the treatment sessions) in common. The presence of the other elements seemed more uncertain. Prolonged contacts with occupational therapists and supportive in-treatment environments might build up the sense of belonging through occupation in the participants and thus support weight maintenance after the initial weight loss. The positive correlation between belonging and well-being was found previously [46].

4.1.3. BMI

BMI is a commonly used and recommended variable in weight loss interventions [6, 7]. However, the variable requires attention to possible assessment issues [7]. BMI may vary in different populations, because of differences in body fat and lean mass ratio depending on age, sex, race or nationality, or occupation, e.g., in athletes [4749]. Other methods, e.g., measuring waist circumference, can be recommended to support BMI assessments in estimating the overweight and obesity burden on health [6].

4.1.4. Waist Circumference

Similar to the sample studies, measuring of waist circumference was rather rare in other lifestyle interventions for adults with overweight and obesity [41]. However, lifestyle interventions may significantly reduce waist circumference compared to standard care, as well as maintain the effect for up to three years [41]. It is not known yet, whether the reported effects on waist circumference will sustain beyond one year of active treatment. Further investigations with at least three years of follow-up will also improve the comparability of occupational therapy results with other evidence on the reduction of waist circumference.

4.2. Occupational Therapy Role and Contribution to the Outcomes

As seen in the previous evidence, the identified interventions involving occupational therapists belonged to the secondary and tertiary health promotions, i.e., addressing adults in the risk of impairments or with present diagnoses [17, 50]. However, this review showed that the involvement of occupational therapists may also be relevant in primary health promotion of overweight and obesity, e.g., among healthcare workers and university students. As seen in the included interventions, occupational therapists appeared competent in the planning and execution of weight loss interventions, whether of mono- or multidisciplinary study setup. However, monodisciplinary occupational therapy interventions gave more space for an explication of the occupational therapy role and contributions to positive outcomes. However, we believe that multidisciplinary interventions involving occupational therapists offered a more specialized impact on lifestyle in overweight and obese adults as recommended in the international clinical recommendations. The occupational therapy impact declared in the included interventions did not include either education on nutrition and diabetes nor meal replacement. Since the topics on nutrition and disease may require specialized knowledge and skills, we found it appropriate that occupational therapists co-operated with dietitians, nurses, etc. in these fields. The multimodal and multidisciplinary approach to overweight and obesity has its advantages and is supported by evidence [51]. Thus, occupational therapy will consequently face the demand on an explication of its role, especially in multidisciplinary approaches.

We experienced that the current occupational therapy involvement was not comprehensively explicated and transparent in the reviewed interventions. The occupational therapy role and approach to treatment were reflected in a few articles from the sample. At the same time, the intervention components and strategies described in the articles with less transparency of occupational therapy involvement were close to those with clearly declared occupational therapy involvement, independently of mono- or multidisciplinary intervention character. Both types of interventions named above had similar components, e.g., physical activity practice, nutrition adjustments, relaxation techniques, cognitive techniques, and disease-specific elements. Both used collaborating with clients, education, setting individual goals, delivering instrumental, and social support, promoting active learning and sharing experiences, and supporting skill transfer to everyday life. However, education on the role of activity, focus on enjoyment from being active, and holistic approach to rehabilitation involving family and friends were only mentioned in the articles that delivered more comprehensive descriptions of occupational therapy contribution. Those qualities may be highlighted as the professional occupational therapy contribution in the interventions for overweight and obese adults. Additionally, occupational therapists contributed to the outcomes with a more rigorous use of VR (virtual reality) technology for exercise. Surprisingly, meal preparation and coping were only mentioned in the articles with no reports on a defined occupational therapy role. Meal preparation as a therapeutic tool would often be considered by occupational therapists in treatment planning [52]. Coping strategies, e.g., strengthening self-efficacy in an individual, would rather be in the occupational therapy scope as well [53]. We suppose that some core parts of the occupational therapy scope were lacking in this review due to the rather small sample size.

On the basis of the identified intervention components and strategies, all the reviewed studies could to a certain extent be linked to the previously outlined occupational therapy focus domains (e.g., “health promotion and prevention, increasing physical activity participation, modifying dietary intake, and reducing the impact of obesity”) and strategies (e.g., “assessment, modifying the environment, education, and introducing and adapting occupations”) [17]. All the interventions were promoting participation in adapted activities for weight loss to improve health and well-being and prevent disability [18]. However, the levels of adaptation and voluntary choice, as well as the scope of activities used within the interventions, varied across the sample. The fact of occupational therapists’ involvement in the included studies contrasted with a poor specification of occupational therapy impact in the intervention descriptions. On the other hand, the similarities in the intervention components and strategies declared across the sample, including few monodisciplinary occupational therapy interventions, allowed us to suppose that occupational therapy impact in vivo might be greater than it was possible to detect in the current review.

The identified interventions link to occupational therapy also due to their focus on implementing of the new healthy lifestyle and sustainable changes in everyday practice related to physical activity, nutrition, and cognition, rather than only on weight-related outcomes. The evidence has described the occupational therapy role in lifestyle approaches as the mediator between some new wanted and needed healthy behaviors and an individual’s habitual conditions [18]. Changing lifestyle and health behavior demands improvements in occupational performance through a holistic approach, which cannot be reduced solely to better physical fitness in an individual [54]. Thus, occupational therapy interventions may operate with a broader understanding of lifestyle, not limited to the presence of the three components (physical activity, nutrition, and cognitive treatment) mentioned in clinical recommendations to overweight and obesity treatment. We believe that every true occupational therapy intervention would potentially be “a lifestyle intervention” due to its focus on the whole person, knowledge transfer, and skills’ adaptation into real life. Consultations with stakeholders, such as former and potential study participants, occupational therapy practitioners, other healthcare professionals from the multidisciplinary intervention teams, and researchers in the field of overweight and obesity may prove our assumptions and deepen the definition of the role and the impact of the OT in this area.

Occupational therapy contributed to the outcomes in the reviewed interventions with a holistic approach, sharing knowledge on the role of activity in people’s life, supporting the new exercise routines with technology and encouraging enjoyment from being active. Further explication of the occupational therapy role and contribution in overweight and obesity treatment would deepen the understanding of occupational therapy potential in the field and let occupational therapists be involved in the future interventions for overweight and obese individuals at all levels of health promotion. For example, the use of assessment tools and indicators for changes in lifestyle and health behavior that are relevant for occupational therapy would open the door for more comprehensive descriptions of occupational therapy impact in future overweight and obesity interventions involving occupational therapists. We hope that the current review will inspire occupational therapy researchers to improve the quality and transparency of the evidence on the topic.

4.3. Study Limitations

Limitation of the methodological approach in this study is that scoping reviews provide an in-breadth overview on the topic, and not in-depth. This scoping review was not aimed to map all the literature on occupational therapy in the field of overweight and obesity but only focused on experimental studies from selected databases and with the identifiable involvement of occupational therapists. The selection strategy included keywords assigned by authors and may cause some of the relevant studies to be missing. Both primary and secondary articles usually are in focus of scoping reviews [55]. This review differentiated between these two categories, referring to the secondary evidence in the background and discussion sections of this study. Only primary publications were subject to analysis. Therefore, the scope of interventions addressing individuals with overweight and obesity and involving occupational therapists may be not accurately reflected in this scoping review.

5. Conclusion

The current review suggested that the interventions involving occupational therapists may help overweight and obese adults to achieve a significant change in weight loss in the short-term. Additional studies are still needed to confirm the suggestion. Whether occupational therapy can help the achievement of clinical significant intermediate- and long-term weight loss is still to be investigated.

This study found a little improvement in the evidence quality since Haracz et al. underscored insufficiency of the evidence in this field of research in 2013–14. A few randomized controlled blinded trials were identified in this study, which was indicating ongoing development in this area of practice and research. The review showed occupational therapists being competent actors in different parts of the intervention process in both the mono- and multidisciplinary overweight and obesity interventions. We found that occupational therapists contributed to the intervention outcomes with a holistic approach, providing knowledge on the role of activity in humans, supporting changes in health behavior with technology and promoting the enjoyment from being active.

We recommend the initiation of further comprehensive lifestyle interventions, e.g., randomized clinical trials, with the involvement of occupational therapists in the treatment of overweight and obese adults in all settings. The international clinical recommendations in the field, the OT-relevant assessment methods, and long-term follow-up phases ought to be considered for inclusion in the future interventions. Further evaluations of the effectiveness of the overweight and obesity interventions for adults involving occupational therapists together with a more comprehensive explication of the OT role and contributions to the intervention outcomes will improve the current evidence in this area.

Disclosure

The authors are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators, A. Afshin, M. H. Forouzanfar et al., “Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years,” The New England journal of medicine, vol. 377, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. World Health Organization, “Obesity and overweight, fact sheet,” January 2017, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
  3. F. Clark, F. S. Reingold, and K. Salles-Jordan, “Obesity and occupational therapy (position paper),” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 701–703, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. M. Ilvig and J. R. Christensen, “Degree of disability among female healthcare workers who are overweight or obese,” Cogent Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, article 1282032, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. S. Wang, K. D. Brownell, and T. A. Wadden, “The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals,” International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1333–1337, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. National Health, Lung, and Blood Institute, Managing overweight and obesity in adults: Systematic evidence review from the Obesity expert panel. Evidence report, National Health, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDoHaH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 2013, November 2013, https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/media/docs/obesity-evidence-review.pdf.
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, Adolescents and Children in Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, 2013, January 2017, https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/n57_obesity_guidelines_140630.pdf.
  8. D. C. Lau, J. D. Douketis, K. M. Morrison et al., “2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary],” CMAJ, vol. 176, no. 8, pp. S1–13, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. V. Yumuk, C. Tsigos, M. Fried et al., “European guidelines for obesity management in adults,” Obesity Facts, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 402–424, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. The Danish Health Authority, Overweight – The Prevention Pack, The Danish Health Authority, Copenhagen, 2018, https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2018/~/media/92E34F6D5D94489F803C677FE757C3C2.ashx.
  11. W. P. James, “WHO recognition of the global obesity epidemic,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 32, no. S7, pp. S120–S126, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Lang, C. James, S. Ashby et al., “The provision of weight management advice: an investigation into occupational therapy practice,” Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 387–394, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Forhan, “Obesity and healthy occupations,” in Discussion Document, Professional issue forum, CAOT, Whitehorse, Yukon, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Forhan and S. Gill, “Cross-border contributions to obesity research and interventions: a review of Canadian and American occupational therapy contributions,” Occupational Therapy In Health Care, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Forhan, “Weight loss interventions for rehabilitation patients with obesity,” Current obesity reports, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 330–335, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Heslop, “A critical review into the role of occupational therapy in promoting the quality of life for people with bariatric needs,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 72, no. 4, p. 173, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Haracz, S. Ryan, M. Hazelton, and C. James, “Occupational therapy and obesity: an integrative literature review,” Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 356–365, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. S. Reingold and K. Jordan, “Obesity and occupational therapy,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 67, pp. S39–S46, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Arksey and L. O'Malley, “Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework,” International journal of social research methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Davis, N. Drey, and D. Gould, “What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature,” International journal of nursing studies, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1386–1400, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Levac, H. Colquhoun, and K. K. O'Brien, “Scoping studies: advancing the methodology,” Implementation Science, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 69, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. L. Colquhoun, D. Levac, K. K. O'Brien et al., “Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1291–1294, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. C. Tricco, E. Lillie, W. Zarin et al., “A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 15, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. D. Peters, C. M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C. B. Soares, “Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews,” International journal of evidence-based healthcare, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Khalil, M. Peters, C. M. Godfrey, P. McInerney, C. B. Soares, and D. Parker, “An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews,” Worldviews on evidence-based nursing., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118–123, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. World Medical Association, “Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects,” JAMA, vol. 310, no. 20, pp. 2191–2194, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and The PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement,” PLoS medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, article e1000097, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Brown, J. Goetz, and E. Hamera, “Weight loss intervention for people with serious mental illness: a randomized controlled trial of the RENEW program,” Psychiatric services, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 800–802, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Brown, J. Goetz, E. Hamera, and B. Gajewski, “Treatment response to the RENEW weight loss intervention in schizophrenia: impact of intervention setting,” Scizophrenia Research, vol. 159, no. 2-3, pp. 421–425, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Christensen, A. Faber, D. Ekner, K. Overgaard, A. Holtermann, and K. Søgaard, “Diet, physical exercise and cognitive behavioral training as a combined workplace based intervention to reduce body weight and increase physical capacity in health care workers - a randomized controlled trial,” BMC Public Health, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 671, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. R. Christensen, K. Overgaard, I. G. Carneiro, A. Holtermann, and K. Søgaard, “Weight loss among female health care workers - a 1-year workplace based randomized controlled trial in the FINALE-health study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 625, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. K. McClure, R. J. McClure, R. Day, and A. M. Brufsky, “Randomized controlled trial of the breast cancer recovery program for women with breast cancer–related lymphedema,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Brown, J. Goetz, A. Van Sciver, D. Sullivan, and E. Hamera, “A psychiatric rehabilitation approach to weight loss,” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 267–273, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Pendlebury, R. Holt, H. Wildgust, and R. I. G. Holt, “Long-term maintenance of weight loss in patients with severe mental illness through a behavioural treatment programme in the UK,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 286–294, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Voruganti, J. Whatham, E. Bard et al., “Going beyond: an adventure- and recreation-based group intervention promotes well-being and weight loss in schizophrenia,” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 575–580, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Brown, H. Read, M. Stanton, M. Zeeb, J. A. Jonikas, and J. A. Cook, “A pilot study of the nutrition and exercise for wellness and recovery (NEW-R): a weight loss program for individuals with serious mental illnesses,” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 371–373, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Haber, C. Looney, K. Babola, M. Hinman, and C. J. Utsey, “Impact of a health promotion course on inactive, overweight, or physically limited older adults,” Family & Community Health, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 48–56, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. A. Rynne and K. McKenna, “Evaluation of an outpatient diabetes education programme,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 459–465, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. N. Bacon, L. Farnworth, and R. Boyd, “The use of the Wii fit in forensic mental health: exercise for people at risk of obesity,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 61–68, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Jacobs, L. Zhu, M. Dawes et al., “Wii health: a preliminary study of the health and wellness benefits of Wii fit on university students,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 262–268, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Galani and H. Schneider, “Prevention and treatment of obesity with lifestyle interventions: review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Public Health, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 348–359, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Ramage, A. Farmer, K. Eccles, and L. McCargar, “Healthy strategies for successful weight loss and weight maintenance: a systematic review,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Batsis, L. E. Gill, R. K. Masutani et al., “Weight loss interventions in older adults with obesity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials since 2005,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 257–268, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. Womble, S. Wang, D. Sarwer et al., “Do patients adjust weight loss expectations?” Obesity Research, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 41, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  45. C. Sciamanna, M. Kiernan, B. J. Rolls et al., “Practices associated with weight loss versus weight-loss maintenance: results of a national survey,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. K. R. Whalley Hammell, “Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: an exploration: Appartenance, occupation et bien-être humain: Une étude exploratoire,” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Bambrick, “Relationships between BMI, waist circumference, hypertension and fasting glucose: rethinking risk factors in indigenous diabetes,” Australian Indigenous Health Bulletin, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 1, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  48. P. Deurenberg, M. Deurenberg-Yap, and S. Guricci, “Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. W. James, R. Jackson-Leach, C. NiMhurchu et al., “Overweight and obesity (high body mass index),” in Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors, M. Ezzati, A. Lopez, A. Rodgers, and C. Murray, Eds., pp. 497–596, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Scriven and A. Atwal, “Occupational therapists as primary health promoters: opportunities and barriers,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 424–429, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Z. Brewster, B. Nowrouzi, and L. Davis, “The role of occupational therapy in obesity management,” University of Toronto Medical Journal, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 33–35, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  52. W. Bryant and E. McKay, “What's cooking? Theory and practice in the kitchen,” British Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Gage, “The appraisal model of coping: an assessment and intervention model for occupational therapy,” The American journal of occupational therapy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 353–362, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. Orellano, W. I. Colón, and M. Arbesman, “Effect of occupation- and activity-based interventions on instrumental activities of daily living performance among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review,” The American journal of occupational therapy, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 292–300, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. Grimshaw, L. McAuley, L. Bero et al., “Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes,” Quality & safety in health care, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 298–303, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar