Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility
Table 5
Clients’ engagement and reflection in the two types of interviews.
Clients’ engagement
Clients’ reflection
COPM with TM
COPM
COPM with TM
COPM
Client
Age
Type of brain injury
To a higher degree
To a lesser degree
Not scored
To a higher degree
To a lesser degree
Not scored
To a higher degree
To a lesser degree
Not scored
To a higher degree
To a lesser degree
Not scored
(1) Male
55
Multiple sclerosis
4
1
0
4
1
0
3
2
0
2
3
0
(2) Female
60
Cerebral palsy
4
0
1
0
4
1
4
0
1
0
4
1
(3) Male
51
Trauma
4
1
0
1
4
0
3
1
1
0
3
2
(4) Female
55
Stroke
4
0
1
3
0
2
4
0
1
2
1
2
(5) Male
52
Cerebral palsy
5
0
0
0
4
1
4
1
0
0
4
1
(6) Male
51
Stroke
5
0
0
5
0
0
2
3
0
4
1
0
The table shows the distribution of the scores of the five members in the evaluation team (). To a higher degree combined the scores “to a large extent” and “to some extent.” To a lesser degree combined the scores “to a lesser extent” and “not at all.”
