Research Article

Prostate Cancer Severity Associations with Neighborhood Deprivation

Table 2

Stratified analysis—associations of neighborhood SES characteristics with indicators of prostate cancer severity (GEE) adjusted for age and diagnosis year.

EffectTumor aggressivenessHigh stageHigh Gleason
Caucasian
OR (95% CI)
African American OR (95% CI)Caucasian
OR (95% CI)
African American
OR (95% CI)
Caucasian
OR (95% CI)
African American OR (95% CI)

≥ Median % neighborhood poverty0.98
(0.86, 1.12)
1.08
(0.79, 1.48)
0.92
(0.83, 1.03)
0.97
(0.78, 1.22)
1.05 (0.97, 1.14)1.39***
(1.15, 1.67)
≥ Median % household income <$30,0001.06
(0.93, 1.22)
0.98
(0.74, 1.29)
1.01
(0.91, 1.12)
0.99
(0.80, 1.23)
1.08
(0.99, 1.17)
1.26*
(1.05, 1.51)
< Median % high school education1.12
(0.99, 1.28)
1.14
(0.87, 1.48)
1.01
(0.91, 1.13)
1.02
(0.84, 1.24)
1.07
(0.98, 1.15)
1.34**
(1.13, 1.60)
≥ Median % female head of household with dependent child(ren)1.03
(0.90, 1.18)
0.97
(0.71, 1.32)
0.94
(0.84, 1.04)
1.00
(0.79, 1.27)
1.07
(0.99, 1.16)
1.18
(0.97, 1.44)
≥ Median % households with no car1.02
(0.89, 1.16)
0.99
(0.74, 1.33)
0.94
(0.84, 1.04)
0.91
(0.73, 1.14)
1.09*
(1.01, 1.19)
1.46***
(1.20, 1.78)
≥ Median % public assistance0.96
(0.84, 1.10)
1.02
(0.75, 1.40)
0.89*
(0.80, 0.99)
0.95
(0.76, 1.19)
1.04
(0.96, 1.13)
1.32**
(1.08, 1.62)
Deprivation quartile 2 versus 11.04
(0.89, 1.21)
1.84
(0.98, 3.46)
0.98
(0.87, 1.11)
1.28
(0.82, 2.01)
1.05
(0.96, 1.15)
1.32
(0.89, 1.95)
Deprivation quartile 3 versus 10.91
(0.76, 1.08)
1.45
(0.81, 2.58)
0.90
(0.78, 1.04)
0.97
(0.65, 1.45)
1.01
(0.90, 1.13)
1.36
(0.96, 1.94)
Deprivation quartile 4 versus 11.27*
(1.01, 1.59)
1.62
(0.93, 2.81)
0.98
(0.82, 1.18)
1.13
(0.77, 1.64)
1.34***
(1.19, 1.52)
1.71**
(1.21, 2.40)
Deprivation quartile, P value

, , .