Review Article

Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Previous Prostate Surgery and Radiotherapy

Table 3

Perioperative outcomes in clinical series consisting of patients who underwent RARP after prostate surgery.

SeriesStudy populationMean follow-up, mosMean EBL, mLMean OR time, minMean days on catheter, dMean hospital stay, dNerve sparing,

Zugor et al. [38]80 pts with TURP before RARP versus 80 pts with RARP13.5165 versus 144189 versus 149 6.8 versus 5.2NA42 versus 54
Martin et al.
[36]
24 pts with previous treatment to the prostate and RARP versus 486 with no previous treatment and RARP NA155 versus 137200 versus 18612 versus 8 ( )2.2 versus 1.514 versus 403
Gupta et al.
[37]
18 pts with TURP before RARP versus 8 pts with pT1b CaP and RARP versus 132 pts with RARP15.34941 versus 358.3 versus 324.2 ( )189.1 versus 162.5 versus 16615.5 versus 14.2 versus 13.34.4 versus 4.1 versus 3.2NA
Martin- schek et al.
[39]
19 pts with previous TURP and RARP versus 19 pts with previous TURP and RRPNA333 versus 1103 ( )217 versus 174 ( )7.9 versus 11.7 ( )8.5 versus 11.7 ( )14 versus 13

TURP: transurethral resection of the prostate; RARP: robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; CaP: prostate cancer; EBL: estimated blood loss; OR: operating; and NA: not available.