Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 5286929 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5286929

Pitchou Mukaz Mbey, Olivier Mukuku, Willy Kalau Arung, Guylain Kitoko Tengu, Nasser Lubosha Amisi, Véronique Kabila Kyabu, Etienne Fwamba Koshe Odimba, François Katombe Tshilombo, "Clinical, Histopathological, and Prognostic Characteristics of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo", Prostate Cancer, vol. 2020, Article ID 5286929, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5286929

Clinical, Histopathological, and Prognostic Characteristics of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

Academic Editor: Hendrik Van Poppel
Received26 May 2020
Revised03 Oct 2020
Accepted04 Dec 2020
Published10 Dec 2020

Abstract

Introduction. Prostate cancer is currently a public health problem with a frequency that varies from country to country. This study aims to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological and outcome features of prostate cancer in Lubumbashi in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Materials and Methods. This was a descriptive longitudinal study of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer at the University Clinics of Lubumbashi. The study period was 3 years (2017 to 2019). Parameters studied were age and clinical, biological (PSA level, prostatic specific antigen), histopathological, and outcome features. Results. The mean age of patients was 68.7 years (range: 47 and 90 years). The 60 to 69 age group was the most affected (43.18%). Elderly subjects (≥60 years old) represented 89.77% of the cases (n = 79). Voiding disorders were the main reason for consultation in 55.68% of the cases. The mean PSA level was 133.7 ng/ml (range: 4 and 1564.5 ng/ml) at diagnosis and 125.4 ng/ml after 3 months of follow-up (range: 0.16 and 1782.1 ng/ml). Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histological type (100%). In prognosis, 31.82% of patients had a Gleason score greater than 7 and 59.10% had a high risk at the D’Amico risk classification for Prostate Cancer. Hormone therapy was administered alone in 75% of the cases and in combination with pulpectomy in 13.64% of the cases. The 3-year overall survival was 56.82%. Conclusion. Prostate cancer is frequent and has a poor outcome in our country. The establishment of an individual screening policy would be an undeniable advantage in improving the prognosis.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men [1]. In developed countries, it ranks second after lung cancer but ranks first with liver cancer in West Africa [2]. Globally, black men are more affected than whites. Its frequency varies according to the age pyramid, economic development, and access to healthcare for populations. It is estimated that by 2030 the global annual incidence will reach 1.7 million new cases [3]. Admittedly, this incidence has been increasing steadily since the popularization of diagnostic means, in particular by suspicious digital rectal examination and the determination of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) [4]. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), in Kinshasa, a screening study carried out on 162 men aged 40 to 70 years reported a detection rate of PCa of 2.5% [5]. However, it is difficult for us, as in most developing countries, to assess the extent and impact of this cancer due to the lack of epidemiological indicators.

This study aims to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological and outcome features of prostate cancer in Lubumbashi in the DRC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Patients

This was a longitudinal prospective study, conducted in the urology service of the University Clinics of Lubumbashi for a period of 3 years, from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2019. The samples consisted of biopsies and operating pieces fixed in 10% formalin. These samples were processed using conventional histology techniques. Parameters studied were age at diagnosis, circumstances of discovery, PSA level at diagnosis and 3 months after initiation of treatment, histological analysis, Gleason score, D’Amico risk classification for PCa, treatment administered, and outcome of the patients.

The PSA assay was carried out using a HumanReader HS brand device with a PSA kit from the Human Diagnostics Worldwide laboratory (65205 Wiesbaden, Germany). For the prostate biopsy, we used sterile Fast-Cut disposable needles 20 cm long and 20 mm in diameter from the firm Sterylab (Milan, Italy). The biopsy was echo-guided using a Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound System model S11 (Sonomed, 74-00128 Rome, Italy) with an endorectal probe equipped with a device for the biopsy needle.

Per patient, twelve sextant biopsies (due to 3 cores in the 4 anatomical zones of the prostate described by Mc Neal) were fixed in 10% formalin in vials previously labeled, packaged, and shipped for histological analysis.

2.2. Data Collection and Analysis

Data collected were double cross-checked and edited for every existing error. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0. Descriptive analysis was carried out using calculations of proportions for qualitative variables (frequency, percentage) and means (standard deviation [SD]) for the continuous variables. To compare frequencies, we used Pearson’s chi-square test and the ANOVA test to compare means between different outcomes. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyze the 3-year overall survival rate of the cases. All cases without the event of interest (death) at the end of the follow-up period were censored. We considered as significance level a probability of error lower than 0.05.

2.3. Ethical Approval

Permission was obtained from the medical ethic committee of the University of Lubumbashi.

3. Results

3.1. Age

The age of the patients varied between 47 and 90 years with a mean age of 68.7 years; 79.5% of the patients were between 60 and 79 years old (Table 1).


VariableNumber (n = 88)Percentage

Age
<50 years22.27
50–59 years77.95
60–69 years3843.18
70–79 years3236.36
≥80 years910.23
Mean ± SD (range)68.73 ± 8.0247–90

Comorbidity
None6169.32
High blood pressure1517.05
Diabetes89.09
Respiratory failure33.41
Heart failure22.27

Circumstances of discovery
Voiding disorder4955.68
Lucky find3236.36
Spinal pain910.23
Edema of the lower limbs55.68
Hematuria33.41
Hemospermia22.27
Paraplegia22.27

Prostate state on digital rectal examination
Normal4955.68
Abnormal3944.32

3.2. Circumstances of Discovery

The telltale signs of PCa were dominated by voiding disorders presented by 49 patients representing 55.68% of the cases. The rest of the patients consulted for low back pain (10.23%) or hematuria (3.68%) or hemospermia (2.27%). The diagnosis of PCa was incidentally discovered during a health check in 32 patients (36.36%). In 44.32% of the patients, the digital rectal exam was malignant.

3.3. PSA Level

The mean PSA level at diagnosis was 133.7 ng/ml (range: 4 and 1564.5 ng/ml) and at 3 months of follow-up was 125.4 ng/ml (range: 0.16 and 1782.1 ng/ml). Table 2 shows distribution of the patients according to the PSA level at diagnosis and at 3 months of follow-up.


VariableNumber (n = 88)Percentage

PSA level at diagnosis
<10 ng/ml1112.50
10–100 ng/ml4854.55
>100 ng/ml2932.95
Mean (range)133.7(4–1564.5)

PSA level at 3 months of follow-up
<4 ng/ml1719.32
4–9.9 ng/ml1011.36
10–100 ng/ml3034.09
>100 ng/ml3135.23
Mean (range)125.4(0.16–1782.1)

Gleason score
<72629.55
73438.64
>72831.82

D’Amico risk classification
Low risk1820.45
Intermediate risk1820.45
High risk5259.10

Treatment
Hormone therapy6675.00
Hormone therapy + pulpectomy1213.64
Surveillance66.82
Radical prostatectomy44.55

Outcome
Survived5056.82
Deceased2427.27
Lost to follow-up1415.91

3.4. Histological Features

Histologically, PCa was essentially adenocarcinoma observed in all of the cases in our series. Distribution of the patients, according to the Gleason score and the D’Amico risk classification, is presented in Table 2.

PSA levels increase steadily based on the Gleason score. The analysis of the correlation between PSA level at diagnosis and Gleason score is illustrated in Figure 1.

3.5. Treatment

Regarding the treatment administered to our patients, 75% of the cases were put on hormone therapy alone and 13.64% in combination with a pulpectomy (Table 2).

3.6. Outcomes

After 3 years of follow-up, we recorded 24 deaths (27.27%) and 14 lost to follow-up (15.91%). The main causes of death in our patients were severe anemia (16/24), and chronic renal failure (11/24). The 3-year overall survival rate was 56.82%. The mean follow-up time for deceased patients was 12.33 months (range: 5 and 24 months).

Table 3 shows characteristics of the patients according to their outcome. We find that there is a statistically significant correlation between the appearance of PCa on digital rectal examination and outcome of the patients ; the same is true for mean PSA level and patients’ outcome . The mean PSA levels at diagnosis were 80.38 ng/ml, 268.35 ng/ml, and 93.53 ng/ml, respectively, in surviving, deceased, and lost to follow-up patients. The comparison of these means shows a statistically significant difference . At 3 months of follow-up, the mean PSA levels were 28.44 ng/ml, 357.66 ng/ml, and 73.39 ng/ml, respectively, in surviving, deceased, and lost to follow-up patients. These three means were statistically different . We found that means PSA level of deceased patients were significantly high compared to other patients.


VariableSurvived (n = 50)Deceased (n = 24)Lost to follow-up (n = 14) value

Age (in years)
Mean (range)68.48 (49–90)68.79 (47–83)69.57 (60–80)0.905

PSA level at diagnosis (in ng/ml)
Mean (range)80.38 (6.5–89.32)268.35 (9–1564.50)93.53 (4–251.00)0.007

PSA level at 3 months of follow-up (in ng/ml)
Mean (range)28.44 (0.16–87.12)357.66 (88.13–1782.10)73.39 (0.23–201.16)<0.0001

Comorbidity0.6966
Present14 (28.00%)9 (37.50%)4 (28.57%)
Absent36 (72.00%)15 (62.50%)10 (71.43%)

Prostate on digital rectal examination0.0013
Normal35 (70.00%)6 (25.00%)8 (57.14%)
Abnormal15 (30.00%)18 (75.00%)6 (42.86%)

D’Amico risk classification0.1163
Low risk12 (24.00%)4 (16.67%)2 (14.29%)
Intermediate risk13 (26.00%)1 (4.17%)4 (28.57%)
High risk25 (50.00%)19 (79.17%)8 (57.14%)

Gleason score0.0513
<719 (38.00%)3 (12.50%)4 (28.57%)
719 (38.00%)8 (33.33%)7 (50.00%)
>712 (24.00%)13 (54.17%)3 (21.43%)

The risk of dying among the patients included in this study was increasing with clinical stage. Patients without abnormalities on digital rectal examination were dying at a long interval compared to those with abnormalities (Figure 2). Additionally, it was also observed that the difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the two groups was statistically significant .

In this study, despite the risk of dying among patients with Gleason score >7, the 3-year overall survival rate was not significantly different from the patients who had Gleason score ≤7 although the ones with Gleason score were more likely to die than those with Gleason score ≤7. Even the Kaplan–Meier curves for the three Gleason score groups compared were almost overlying (Figure 3).

The probability of dying among patients with PSA >100 ng/ml in our study was higher than those with PSA <10 ng/ml and PSA between 10 and 100 ng/ml. This contributed to the gap in the 3-year overall survival rate between the two groups although the survival rate was significantly different (Figure 4).

Figure 5 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves for D’Amico risk classification in relation to 3-year overall survival rate. The correlation of D’Amico risk classification and the 3-year overall survival rate was not statistically significant . Patients in the group with high risk were more likely to die than patients with low and intermediate risks. In less than 10 months of overall survival after diagnosis, patients in all groups had almost equal survival. Thereafter, the survival rate of those at high risk decreased compared to those with low and intermediate risks.

4. Discussion

This preliminary study cannot be considered as globalizing all the cases of PCa observed in Lubumbashi, because only the flow of patients seen in consultation and follow-up was taken into account in the urology service of the University Clinics of Lubumbashi, which is responsible for ensuring biopsy samples. Some patients consult in private centers or outside the country or even die without consulting. Nevertheless, it translates the various current presentations of PCa in Lubumbashi.

This study finds 68.7 years as the mean age of the patients with PCa, comparable to those found in the African literature reporting a mean age of 69 years [4, 6, 7]. Other African and European studies have noted a mean age of 71 years [8, 9] reflecting that PCa is a disease of the elderly. According to Villiers and Grosclaude [10], it is the most common cancer in men over 50 years of age. In this study, 2 (2.27%) patients were exceptionally less than 50 years old with the notion of cancer in first degree relatives. However, it should be noted that this notion of family cancer in our series had not been documented and was based only on patient claims. The mean age at diagnosis was high, hence the presence of these very advanced forms beyond any therapeutic resource, especially in our context. The delay in diagnosis is linked to the natural history of PCa but also to the apprehensions that men had coming to see the urologist. In addition, there are a lack of information and awareness-raising policy among the population on this condition and difficulties in accessing PCa screening services [11].

Clinically, voiding disorders (55.68%) and spinal bone pain (10.23%) were frequent reasons for consultation. Botto et al. [12] found 69% and 70%, respectively, for voiding disorders and spinal bone pain; Magoha [13] also noted 64.5% for spinal pain. The existence of functional manifestations is a constant witness to the spread of cancer pathology. Voiding disorders frequently revealed PCa and this prevalence is reported in the literature [4].

With the advent of Pca screening, incidental discoveries just about elevating PSA levels without clinical signs become frequent [14]. In the present study, we also observed 36.36% of incidental discovery during a health check, the result of awareness for individual screening. But this rate is still very low compared to European studies because this individual screening is not yet common practice in our country.

On digital rectal examination, abnormalities in favor of Pca were observed in 44.32% of our patients. Tengue et al. [15] reported 81.9% of cases with abnormalities on the digital rectal examination. This is mainly due to an advanced stage of Pca as is the case in most African series [7, 13, 15]. This is also demonstrated in the present study where we found that there was a statistically significant correlation between the prostate abnormality on digital rectal examination and mortality .

In the present study, mean PSA level is relatively high (133.7 ng/ml). Mean values vary according to studies: 120 ng/ml for Diallo et al. [16] in Guinea, 121.94 ng/ml for Troh et al. [17] in Côte d’Ivoire, 125.7 ng/ml for Niang et al. [18] in Senegal, and 419.71 ng/ml for Engbang et al. [19] in Cameroon. This situation could be explained by an often-late diagnosis of PCa in our country. However, these values are not always a function of the degree of tumor differentiation, which shows great variability in PSA levels compared to the histological type. PSA (biological reference marker) is a kallikrein primarily secreted by prostate epithelial cells under the control of an androgen-dependent gene. The interest of its dosage in prostatic pathology (cancerous or benign) is well known: diagnostic aid, prognostic value, monitoring of the effectiveness of treatment, and detection of recurrences and metastases [18, 20, 21]. In the present study, we found that the mean PSA levels (at diagnosis and at 3 months of follow-up) were statistically very high in the deceased patients compared to those who survived, reflecting a strong association between the PSA level and patients’ outcome.

In terms of diagnosis, only conventional histopathology techniques are practiced in Lubumbashi where histopathological examination remains the only means of diagnosing PCa. The absence of labeling techniques makes diagnosis sometimes difficult. In our study, adenocarcinomas represent most of the histological types as in the literature [17, 2224]. According to Mostofi et al. [25], other types are rare (around 3%) and their diagnosis requires the contribution of different techniques not accessible in our environment outside the standard PSA dosage.

Therapeutically, the majority of our patients had received first-line hormone therapy in 75% of the cases as in the series by Tengue et al. [15] in Togo, sometimes associated with pulpectomy in 13.64% of the cases. This indicates the advanced stage of these tumors. Patients with locally advanced cancer had received only hormone therapy while hormone radiotherapy is recommended [26], a method which is not available in Lubumbashi due to lack of adequate technical platform in our structures. The initiation of treatment, particularly hormone therapy, leads to a considerable reduction in clinical manifestations [27]. Similarly, PSA drops also at a variable rate in three to six months, and the lowest rate observed has a prognostic value on survival without recurrence [15].

In this study, we observed at three months of follow-up a decrease in the PSA level in surviving patients (low risk cancer) with a mean PSA level of 28.44 ng/ml (range: 6.5 and 89.32 ng/ml), while in deceased patients the mean PSA level was 357.66 ng/ml (range: 88.13 and 1782.10 ng/ml). This supposes the existence of aggressive forms in the deceased patients faced with soaring PSA levels instead of its decrease. Only 4 patients benefited from a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic route, a technique which deserves to be popularized more and which does not yet have an easy adhesion on the part of our patients.

The present study shows that the 3-year survival rate was 56.82%. Other authors have found 1-year survival rates of 86% [28] and 91% [15] after hormone therapy. Some parameters have been associated with a significant decrease in overall survival: high PSA levels and prostate abnormalities on digital rectal examination. This observation reflects the spread of PCa from a distance in most of our patients. A Ugandan study reported a 3-year overall survival rate of 67.6% with a median survival of 36.5 months [29]. These authors had found that Gleason score, clinical stage, and lymphovascular invasion can independently predict the overall survival of the patients with PCa [29]. Ndoye et al. [8] emphasize not only the delay in diagnosis observed in most sub-Saharan countries but also the lack of policy of channeling these patients suffering from PCa to a center applying the recommendations of learned societies for a codification of management.

The present study reports a poor prognosis in patients followed for prostate cancer. Hence the introduction of this screening in our context could improve the prognosis of our patients while limiting itself to an individual PSA screening after having provided the adapted and informed information to the men wishing a PSA assay on the advantages and disadvantages of the screening, and in particular the risks associated with the diagnostic process and the treatment. A European study demonstrated a reduction in specific mortality linked to prostate cancer of around 20% (relative risk (RR): 0.79; 0.69-0.91) in the group of patients who received PSA screening [30].

One of the contributing factors is the ecological peculiarities of the south-eastern region of the DRC, in particular the province of Katanga where the intensification of metallurgical activities of extraction and processing of ores expose men to physicochemical conditions different from those of the rock putting in the environment potentially toxic trace elements and heavy metals whose effects on the prostate may explain the aggressive forms of prostate cancer observed. In the study by Saleh et al. [31], an association has been observed between disturbance of serum trace elements and prostate cancer. Reduced levels of Se, Zn, and Mn and increased levels of Cu and Fe may play an important role in the initiation of prostate cancer. However, future prospective studies are needed to illustrate the relationship between the different stages of prostate cancer and the levels of trace elements.

5. Conclusion

PCa remains a reality in our environment, its diagnosis often occurs at an advanced stage of the disease, and its clinic features are dominated by voiding disorders and spinal pain. Efforts must be made to improve individual screening because the earlier the diagnosis, the better the management strategy to improve survival.

Data Availability

The datasheet used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. P. Grosclaude, Y. Davin, and C. Neuzillet, “Coulange: évolution de l’épidémiologie du cancer de la prostate depuis 20 ans,” Progres en Urologie, vol. 16, pp. 653–660, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. K. Echimane, A. A. Ahnoux, I. Adoubi et al., “Cancer incidence in abidjan, ivory coast,” Cancer, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 653–663, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. I. A. Shah, “Trace minerals and heavy metals: implications in prostate cancer,” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Biochemistry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. M. Gueye, M. Jalloh, I. E. Labou, L. Niang, R. Kane, and M. Ndoye, “Profil clinique du cancer de la prostate au Sénégal,” African Journal of Urology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. M.-L. Punga-Maole, D. M. Moningo, P. K. Kayembe, M. L. Tshikuela, and J.-M. M. Kabongo, “Étude de dépistage du cancer de la prostate au sein d'une population d’employés d’une entreprise de Kinshasa en république démocratique du Congo. Taux de détection et facteurs de risques nutritionnels et géographiques,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 512–518, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. G. Konan, E. E. Gowe, and A. H. Dekou, “Cancer métastatique de la prostate dans le service d’urologie du CHU de Cocody,” Revue Africaine d'Urologie et d'Andrologie, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 172–176, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  7. B. Kirakoya, P. P. Hounnasso, A. K. Pare, A. B. Mustapha, and B. Zango, “Clinico-pathological features of prostate cancer at the university hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso,” Journal of the West African College of Surgeons, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 69–78, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Ndoye, L. Niang, K. I. Gandaho, M. Jalloh, I. Labou, and S. Gueye, “Cancer avancé de la prostate au Sénégal. Aspects diagnostiques à l'hôpital de Grand Yoff,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 271–275, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. O. Helfrich, S. Crouzet, A. Ruffion et al., “Évolution du nombre de cas incidents de cancer de la prostate en France de 2001 à 2012 à partir de données hospitalières de 5 centres,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 147–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Villers and P. Grosclaude, “Épidémiologie du cancer de la prostate: article de revue,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 32, pp. 2–4, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. F. C. Bugoye, G. H. Leyna, K. Moen, and E. J. Mmbaga, “Knowledge, perceived risk and utilization of prostate cancer screening services among men in dar Es salaam, Tanzania,” Prostate Cancer, vol. 2019, Article ID 2463048, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Botto, M. Rouprét, F. Mathieu, and F. Richard, “Etude randomisée multicentrique comparant la castration médicale par triptoréline à la castration chirurgicale dans le traitement du cancer de la prostate localement avancé ou métastatique,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 235–239, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. A. Magoha, “Management and survival in advanced prostate cancer in Nairobi,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 260–263, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Francois, E. Alezra, J.-C. Kikassa, F. Saint, and G. Raynal, “Le dépistage du cancer de la prostate vu par les médecins généralistes,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 1407–1411, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Tengue, T. M. Kpatcha, G. Botcho et al., “Profil épidémiologique, diagnostique, thérapeutique et évolutif du cancer de la prostate au Togo,” African Journal of Urology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 76–82, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. B. Diallo, N. Youwe Dombeu, A. M. Barry et al., “Caractéristiques cliniques du cancer de la prostate en Guinée. Résultats sur la période 2000-2006,” African J Urol, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 280–287, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. Troh, K. J. N’Dah, B. Doukouré et al., “Cancers de la prostate en Côte-d'Ivoire: aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et anatomopathologiques,” Journal Africain du Cancer/African Journal of Cancer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 202–208, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. S. Niang, N. Drame, M. Jalloh et al., “Distribution de l’antigène spécifique de la prostate dans une population sénégalaise,” Immuno-analyse & Biologie Spécialisée, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. Engbang, B. Sala, H. Moby et al., “Epidemiomorphology of prostate cancer in Cameroon: about 1047 cases,” Journal of Cancer and Tumor International, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Boissier, “L'antigène spécifique de la prostate ou PSA,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 798–800, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Audenet and M. Rouprêt, “Controverses dans le cancer de la prostate localisé: épidémiologie, dépistage et stadification,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 21, pp. S75–S79, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Amégbor, T. Yao Seddoh, K. Tengué, B. Songne-Gnamkoulamba, G. Napo-Koura, and K. James, “Épidémiologie et histopronostic du cancer de la prostate au Togo: à propos de 202cas diagnostiqués au laboratoire d'anatomie pathologique du CHU Tokoin de Lomé,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–115, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. Fournier, A. Valeri, P. Mangin, and O. Cussenot, “Cancer de la prostate. Épidémiologie. Facteurs de risques. anatomopathologie,” Annales d’Urologie, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 187–206, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. F. Peko, P. Bouya, J. Kokolo et al., “Cancers de la prostate au CHU de Brazzaville: épidémiologie et histopronostic,” Médecine d’Afrique Noire, vol. 50, pp. 8-9, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. K. Mostofi, I. A. Sesterhenn, and C. J. Davis, “A pathologist's view of prostatic carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 71, no. S3, pp. 906–932, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. Salomon, D. Azria, C. Bastide et al., “Recommandations en onco-urologie 2010: cancer de la prostate,” Progrès en Urologie, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 5217–5252, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. R. Denmeade and J. T. Isaacs, “Development of prostate cancer treatment: the good news,” The Prostate, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 211–224, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. A. Isaacs, L. M. Reyno, D. I. Jodrell et al., “Suramin, an active drug for prostate cancer: interim observations in a phase I trial,” JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 611–621, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. J. Yahaya, T. Okecha, M. Odida, and H. Wabinga, “Prognostic factors for overall survival of patients with prostate cancer in Kyadondo County, Uganda,” Prostate Cancer, vol. 2020, Article ID 8517130, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. H. Schröder, J. Hugosson, M. J. Roobol et al., “Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up,” The Lancet, vol. 384, no. 9959, pp. 2027–2035, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. A. K. Saleh, H. M. Adly, A. A. Abdelkhaliq, and A. M. Nassir, “Serum levels of selenium, zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in prostate cancer patients,” Current Urology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 44–49, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Pitchou Mukaz Mbey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1085
Downloads947
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.