Which Aspects of Postural Control Differentiate between Patients with Parkinson’s Disease with and without Freezing of Gait?
Table 2
SOT equilibrium score descriptive variables.
Test
Freezers
Nonfreezers
Controls
value
SOT1
94.3 (92.7–94.7)
93.2 (92.0–94.3)
94.3 (93.0–96.0)
0.20
SOT2
92.0 (90.7–92.3)
89.3 (88.0–93.0)
92.2 (90.0–93.7)
0.52
SOT3
90.0 (87.7–92.3)
88.0 (88.0–92.0)
89.7 (88.3–91.7)
0.82
SOT4
75.7 (70.7–84.3)
74.8 (68.3–82.0)
75.5 (65.7–81.3)
0.82
SOT5
55.0 (43.0–69.3)
55.0 (48.3–61.3)
56.2 (50.7–69.0)
0.61
SOT6
54.0 (52.0–65.0)
53.0 (42.3–58.0)
58.9 (58.0–61.0)
<0.01*
Estimated median interquartile range of the SOT equilibrium scores is presented in percentage (%). *Significant differences for Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA overall group analysis.
