Clinical Study
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Does Not Improve the Sequence Effect in Freezing of Gait
Table 1
Comparison of the sequence effect between and within the groups.
| | Tn | Real group (mean ± SD) | Sham group (mean ± SD) | MMRM | value | Post hoc value |
| | T0 | −0.611 ± 0.319 | −0.521 ± 0.422 | Group | 0.782 | Real | Sham | | T1 | −0.718 ± 0.446 | −0.797 ± 0.591 | Visit | 0.287 | 1.000 | 1.000 | | T2 | −0.539 ± 0.670 | −0.508 ± 0.397 | Group visit | 0.641 | 1.000 | 1.000 | | T3 | −0.744 ± 0.820 | −0.385 ± 0.185 | | | 1.000 | 1.000 | | T4 | −0.281 ± 0.731 | −0.430 ± 0.348 | | | 1.000 | 1.000 | | T5 | −0.644 ± 0.531 | −0.612 ± 0.267 | | | 1.000 | 1.000 |
|
|
Post hoc: comparing with T0; Tn: time points; SD: standard deviation; MMRM: mixed effect model repeated measures.
|
