Research Article | Open Access
Luis Agüera-Ortiz, Rocío García-Ramos, Francisco J. Grandas Pérez, Jorge López-Álvarez, José Manuel Montes Rodríguez, F. Javier Olazarán Rodríguez, Javier Olivera Pueyo, Carmelo Pelegrín Valero, Jesús Porta-Etessam, "Focus on Depression in Parkinson’s Disease: A Delphi Consensus of Experts in Psychiatry, Neurology, and Geriatrics", Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2021, Article ID 6621991, 11 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621991
Focus on Depression in Parkinson’s Disease: A Delphi Consensus of Experts in Psychiatry, Neurology, and Geriatrics
Major and minor forms of depression are significant contributors to Parkinson’s disease morbidity and caregiver burden, affecting up to 50% of these patients. Nonetheless, symptoms of depression are still underrecognized and undertreated in this context due to scarcity of evidence and, consequently, consistent clinical guideline recommendations. Here, we carried out a prospective, multicentre, 2-round modified Delphi survey with 49 questions about the aetiopathological mechanisms of depression in Parkinson’s disease (10), clinical features and connections with motor and nonmotor symptoms (10), diagnostic criteria (5), and therapeutic options (24). Items were assessed by a panel of 37 experts (neurologists, psychiatrists, and a geriatrist), and consensus was achieved in 81.6% of them. Depressive symptoms, enhanced by multiple patient circumstances, were considered Parkinson’s disease risk factors but not clinical indicators of motor symptom and disease progression. These patients should be systematically screened for depression while ruling out both anhedonia and apathy symptoms as they are not necessarily linked to it. Clinical scales (mainly the Geriatric Depression Scale GDS-15) can help establishing the diagnosis of depression, the symptoms of which will require treatment regardless of severity. Efficacious and well-tolerated pharmacological options for Parkinson’s comorbid depression were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (especially sertraline), dual-action serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine), multimodal (vortioxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine, and tianeptine), and anti-Parkinsonian dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine). Tricyclic antidepressants and combining type B monoamine oxidase inhibitors with serotonergic drugs have serious side effects in these patients and therefore should not be prescribed. Electroconvulsive therapy was indicated for severe and drug-refractory cases. Cognitive behavioural therapy was recommended in cases of mild depression. Results presented here are useful diagnostic and patient management guidance for other physicians and important considerations to improve future drug trial design.
Neuropsychiatric disorders (and nonmotor symptoms more widely) such as depression very often accompany core motor impairments of Parkinson’s disease (PD) . More and more, they are perceived as significant contributors to PD morbidity and caregiver burden as they have a major impact on patient’s function, quality of life, and long-term outcomes. In fact, it has been suggested that PD should be classified as a neuropsychiatric disease itself rather than a movement disorder .
Up to half of PD patients suffer from major or minor forms of depression at a given time during the disease course, and although they have been widely studied in this context, they remain both underrecognized and undertreated [2, 3]. Standard diagnostic criteria for depression in PD have not been established, perhaps due to an existing overlap between motor and depression symptoms such as (fatigue, insomnia, and psychomotor slowing) as well as the co-occurrence of other nonmotor symptoms such as (anxiety and apathy) . Similarly, therapeutic interventions for depression in the context of PD are neither definitive nor specific. Controlled pharmacological studies and clinical practice reports on antidepressants are still scarce and encompass important limitations such as small sample size, trial duration, and heterogeneity in the assessment and diagnosis of depression [5, 6]. Moreover, information on the management of depression and PD comorbid patients is usually extrapolated from depression, geriatrics, or PD clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), which leads to an increased variability of habits and disagreement among physicians [5, 7].
Hence, the aim of this study is to help homogenize diagnostic and treatment approaches to offer a higher quality healthcare assistance to PD patients with depression. To do it, a 2-round, Delphi questionnaire was used to gather psychiatry, neurology, and geriatrics experts’ opinions and preferences based on their expertise along with current scientific evidence.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This study uses the modified Delphi method [8–10] as in Agüera-Ortiz et al. and Luquin et al. [11, 12]. A two-round closed-ended questionnaire included 49 items revisiting some fundamental clinical aspects of depression in PD: aetiology and risk factors (10), clinical presentation (10), diagnosis (5), and treatment (24). In the second round, participants were presented with the results and comments from the first one. This way, items for which consensus had not been reached could be reassessed. The survey was available on a specifically designed website.
The Scientific Committee was composed of 8 expert physicians in the neurodegenerative diseases field (4 psychiatrists and 4 neurologists) from different Spanish centres. After careful review of the literature, they prepared the questionnaire and validated the study design and protocol. The committee was also in charge of adding the first-round statistical analysis and feedback to the online platform for subsequent reconsideration.
A panel of 37 physicians who routinely assist PD patients (19 neurologists, 17 psychiatrists, and 1 geriatrist) participated in both rounds of the study. They were selected by the committee following a snowball sampling procedure . All of them bring more than 10 years of clinical practice as well as an established and verifiable academic and research career.
2.3. Delphi Methodology
Participants anonymously responded to the questionnaire using a single ordinal 9-point Likert scale: 1–3 (disagreement with the statement; the lower the score, the higher the level of disagreement), 4–6 (neither agreement nor disagreement; a score of 4 is closer to disagreement), and 7–9 (agreement with the statement; the higher the score, the higher the level of agreement). RAND/UCLA criteria was used, for which consensus is reached when less than one-third of participants rates the item outside the 3-point region (1–3, 4–6, and 7–9) containing the median [8, 10, 14]. Median value determined the nature of the consensus (≤3, disagreement; ≥7, agreement). Items were reanalysed in the second round if the median was between 4 and 6 or if one-third or more of the votes fell outside the 3-point region containing it.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Results were interpreted based on the mean and the confidence interval for the average at a 95% confidence level for each item. The higher (closer to 9) or lower (closer to 1) the average, the stronger the collective agreement or disagreement with the statement, respectively. A high unanimity of opinions was mirrored by a low confidence interval. Nonconsensus items were also defined by an interval containing the value 5 (neither agreement nor disagreement). Such items were accompanied by a descriptive reasoning (there was either heterogeneity of opinions or a lack of definitive individual criteria).
The modified Delphi survey on depression in PD patients included a total number of 49 items, which were responded by a panel of experts on neuropsychiatric disorders of the elderly.
Overall, consensus was achieved in most cases (40 statements; 81.6%), either in the first round (36; 73.5%) or in the second one (4; 8.2%; S5, S21, S22, and S25). The majority of them were accepted by the panellists (37; 75.5%). Only a small part of the questionnaire was left for future consideration as consensus could not be reached (9; 18.4%; S4, S8, S23, S30, S32, S37, S46, S47, and S49) (Figure 1). Agreed, disagreed, and nonconsensus items are given in detail in Tables 1–4 according to the following sections: aetiology and risk factors (consensus in 8 (80%) out of 10 statements; Table 1), clinical presentation (consensus in all 10 statements (100%); Table 2), diagnosis (consensus in 4 (80%) out of 5 statements; Table 3), and treatment of depression in PD patients (consensus in 18 (75%) out of 24 statements; Table 4).
PD, Parkinson’s disease; DA, dopamine.
PD, Parkinson’s disease.
PD, Parkinson’s disease; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.
TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; DA, dopamine; NE, norepinephrine; SNRIs, serotonin and NE reuptake inhibitors; MAO-BIs, type B monoamine oxidase inhibitors; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy.
Participants agreed on most questions regarding the management of patients suffering from depression and PD comorbidities. Opinions were based on their own clinical experience and available scientific evidence, and key consensus messages are wrapped up in Figure 2. In the following lines, consensus and controversial topics related to pathophysiological mechanisms of depression in PD, clinical parameters, and connections with other nonmotor symptoms as well as treatment options are addressed in depth in separate sections. This information can be used as guidance for other physicians given that diagnosis of depression in the context of PD is generally challenging and there are no specific guidelines available. Refining diagnosis is also important to reduce heterogeneity among trials and improve consistency. Treatment recommendations including newly commercialized antidepressants complement those found in general CPGs (either PD or depression-dedicated guidelines) from across countries as well as several published systematic literature reviews (SLRs) and meta-analyses.
4.1. Section I: Aetiology and Risk Factors for Depression in PD Patients
Previous evidence has shown that some neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety can occur prior to PD diagnosis, sometimes even years before this is established . In this regard, more than half of the panellists acknowledged that depression is a nonmotor and premotor symptom of PD (Table 1; S1). Moreover, there was major consensus on agreeing that depression is more frequent in future PD patients. Hence, most of responders were certain that depression contributes to the development of the disease, i.e., it can be considered a risk factor (Table 1; S2). In this regard, a recent meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies performed by Wang et al. found a significant association between depression and an increased risk of subsequent PD .
On the contrary, the experts declared that depression would not qualify as a PD progression risk factor while responding to the diagnosis part of the questionnaire (Table 3; S21) and that motor and depression symptom intensities are not related with each other (Table 2; S17). In line with this question, consensus could not be reached when participants were asked about a putative relation between depression and distinct PD motor phenotypes (Table 1; S4). However, it seemed clear to most of participants that the presence of depression in the context of PD is indeed associated with greater severity of motor symptoms (Table 1; S5). Until now, some recent studies on emotional disorders and gait impairments suggest that depressive symptoms are worse [17, 18] and more frequent  during off periods, although they may not meet strict depressive disorder diagnostic criteria . If mood and motor fluctuations are concomitant events , PD modifying agents such as dopamine agonists could delay or prevent psychiatric symptoms (Section IV: Treatment of Depression in PD Patients) . Certainly, further research is warranted to unravel whether depression and motor symptoms are truly interrelated in PD patients and the nature of this link.
What held up to a vast majority of participants was that depression is associated with a higher prevalence of other nonmotor PD symptoms (Table 1; S7) as well as poorer cognitive performance (Table 2; S15). Again, literature shows some discrepancy with regards to the directionality of the latter association [21, 22]. A 4-year longitudinal study from Petkus and colleagues could detect that cognitive decline correlates with a subsequent increase in symptoms of anxiety and depression . On the contrary, Wu et al. suggest that symptoms of depression that occur after PD onset are prodromal signs of dementia .
The pathophysiological link between depression and PD remains elusive. It is thought that a multifactorial model could explain why PD patients also suffer from depression, and this includes genetic susceptibility, adverse vital events and levels of support, coping strategies, and specific disease and psychosocial factors such as low educational and financial status [5, 20, 23]. When asked about specific risk factors, consensus was reached on female gender and older aged PD patients being associated with higher depression rates (Table 1; S6).
From a structural point of view, depressive patients share several brain alterations with PD patients alongside dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin depletion . In the study presented herein, consensus was reached on the contribution of the following phenomena to the development of depression: neurotransmitter depletion (DA, serotonin, and acetylcholine), the impaired basal ganglia limbic system, and connections with orbitofrontal cortex (Table 1; S3 and S9). During early premotor stages of PD, experts acknowledged the existence of data pointing towards the impairment of the habenula having a role on depression (Table 1; S10). For instance, Borgonovo and colleagues suggested that the pathological hyperactivation of the lateral habenula may be at least partially responsible for affective disorders in PD through inhibition of dopaminergic and serotonergic neuronal activities .
4.2. Section II: Clinical Presentation of Depression in PD Patients
Depression in PD is a relevant matter from an epidemiologic point of view, the prevalence of which can reach high values but also vary significantly across studies depending on the setting (outpatient and inpatient clinics, nursing homes, and general population) and the diagnostic approach used . In their systematic review, Reijnders et al. calculated a weighted prevalence for major depression and clinically relevant depressive symptoms of 17% and 35%, respectively . Accordingly, Delphi participants agreed that up to one-third of PD patients can present with these symptoms (Table 2; S11).
There are other neuropsychiatric symptoms that PD patients may present with such as anxiety, apathy, and anhedonia . Although very common (between 3.6% and 40% of PD patients), anxiety is another psychiatric comorbidity in PD patients that lacks robust recommendations to guide its diagnosis and management . According to the expert panel, anxiety was considered a prevalent symptom in PD but not more than depression (Table 2; S13). Still, routine screening was deemed necessary for the majority of them, both at the start of the treatment and upon regimen change as symptoms of anxiety are thought to be enhanced by motor fluctuations  and anti-Parkinsonian drugs (Table 2; S14).
Unlike anxiety, apathy has been wrongly considered a clinical criterion of depression exclusively, but for more than a decade, efforts have been made to recognize it as a standalone syndrome too in older patients with at least some neurological impairment [26, 27]. In fact, international consensus was achieved in 2009 (and revised in 2018) to establish the diagnostic criteria and assessment tools for apathy, defined as the quantitative reduction of goal-directed activity in several dimensions (cognitive, emotional, or social) . Thus, most participants agreed that apathy and depression require differential diagnosis (Table 2; S16). On the one hand, serotonergic affective symptoms such as hopelessness, sad mood, or suicidal thoughts would classify as key depression diagnostic criteria as they are not distinctive features of apathy, which has a nonserotonergic origin (Table 2; S18 and S19). Similar to apathy, experts agreed that anhedonia may be a consequence of the neurodegenerative process and unrelated to a depressive disorder (Table 3; S24).
On the other hand, the mere absence of the former affective symptoms would not rule out a diagnosis of depression. In these cases, it has been proposed that a key discriminant factor would be the low to absent subjective suffering in apathy compared with depression . Additionally, experts have observed that depression can manifest not only as sadness but also as dysphoria (irritation) (Table 2; S20).
4.3. Section III: Diagnosis of Depression in PD Patients
Screening for depression in PD population was found required by the survey responders (Table 2; S12), and it coincides with the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Movement Disorder Society-European Section (EFNS-MDS-ES) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendations [28–30]. According to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Evidence (NICE) and the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (CNSF) CPGs, clinicians should lower the threshold for diagnosing depression in these patients, especially for mild depression, since several clinical features of depression overlap with PD motor symptoms such as (hypophonic speech, lack of facial expression, sleep disorders, and reduced appetite) [29–33]. On top of that, gender may modulate the intricate repertoire of symptoms of depression discussed in Section II, although consensus on this topic could not be reached among participants (Table 3; S23). Hence, it seems reasonable to propose more studies to dissect clinical variables according to gender since prevalence of depression is not equivalent between women and men, as discussed earlier on (Table 1; S6).
Whether the use of depression scales in PD is essential remains an open question. Both SIGN and EFNS/MDS-ES CPGs recommend several validated tools such as the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [28–30], as long as diagnosis is not solely based on them but together with a clinical interview . Of them, GDS-15 is the most specific screening tool for depression in PD, and together with HADS, they are not influenced by somatic symptoms, which makes them suitable for patients with notorious physical impairments . In line with CPG recommendations, participants of this Delphi do not necessarily require tools to unequivocally diagnose depression in PD (Table 3; S22). While the opinion was robust among psychiatrists who found that patient interviews suffice the purpose, a subgroup of neurologists objected to it (data not shown). This observation may be interpreted as a need to provide more advanced training in psychiatric diagnosis to fellow neurologists. Regardless of the diagnostic method, there was a strong stand for the early treatment of depression symptoms in every PD patient, even in the absence of major depression (Table 3; S25).
4.4. Section IV: Treatment of Depression in PD Patients
The benefits of depression treatment are still unclear with the current available data . A couple of meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) by Bomasang-Layno et al. and Mills et al. found that pharmacological therapy of depression in PD ameliorates this condition [35, 36], while Troeung and colleagues determined a modest yet not a statistically significant effect of antidepressants compared with placebo . Other more sceptical authors argue that antidepressants ensure only partial success (as in depression not associated with PD) and that poor adherence to treatment is associated to an increase in all-cause mortality in PD patients . Overall, there is a need of comparative RCT to consistently pinpoint treatment efficacy and select one drug over another [7, 24, 39].
In order to establish consensus, experts were queried on a broad range of treatment approaches for depression in PD. About tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), there are some evidence for treatment with amitriptyline, nortriptyline, and desipramine in PD [6, 7, 11, 40–43]. However, according to the literature and the expert panel opinion, their prescription within the scope of PD is questionable due to their anticholinergic adverse effects such as (cognitive impairment, orthostatic hypotension, increased risk of falls, constipation, and urinary retention) (Table 4; S26) [5, 29, 30, 40, 44]. Furthermore, other sources including the STOPP-START geriatric criteria distrust the administration of nortriptyline and amitriptyline in older PD patients [42, 45]. Bearing that in mind and compared with other TCAs, nortriptyline may be the safest option given its lower risk of anticholinergic effects and therapeutic window . As such, it was also deemed the safest option among tricyclic antidepressants in PD (Table 4; S29). Nevertheless, when tolerability was taken into account together with efficacy, consensus was not achieved (Table 4; S46).
Among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), sertraline was voted as the safest drug among its class (Table 4; S27), which was considered a good treatment approach to tackle depression in the context of PD (Table 4; S42). SSRIs are also recommended by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) CPG as well as the NICE, the Spanish NHS, and the EFNS/MDS-ES guidelines, but they do alert on the potential exacerbation of PD symptoms associated to SSRI uptake [31, 40, 44, 46]. Here, consensus could not be reached when discussing the deleterious effect of both SSRIs and dual-action serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) on motor symptoms (Table 4; S30), which may be linked to the existence of controversial results in previous studies. On the one hand, recent observational studies have documented an association between the prescription of some SSRIs, SNRIs, and other antidepressants and the incidence of movement disorders [47–49]. On the other hand, former RCTs had not observed significative effects on the motor function when comparing SSRIs (paroxetine and escitalopram) with dual SNRIs (venlafaxine and duloxetine) in PD patients [50, 51]. Regarding other side effects, they seem to increase the risk of pharmacological interactions (fluoxetine, paroxetine, and fluvoxamine) and dose-dependent cardiac arrythmia (citalopram and escitalopram), although the FDA and Health Canada-dose limitations in older patients have been challenged by recent data .
Given their efficacy and tolerability, the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine and the dual-action SNRIs venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and duloxetine were considered good options for PD patients with depression (Table 4; S28, S40, S43). Starkstein et al.’s review on RCT, patient-control studies, and case series concluded that both SSRIs and SNRIs are the gold standard treatments, with TCAs being used when patients do not respond well to the second SSRI or SNRI . Last year, the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS) identified some SSRIs (sertraline, citalopram, paroxetine, and fluoxetine) and a SNRI (venlafaxine) as possibly or clinically useful for depression in PD . Other consensus recommendations on the administration of SNRIs in the elderly [11, 53, 54] and in PD patients are found elsewhere [42, 44]. There are no studies assessing the benefits and safety profile of desvenlafaxine or the newly commercialized vortioxetine in depression and PD comorbidities, yet a very recent postmarketing study with a WHO pharmacovigilance database has documented some harmful associations between movement disorders and a plethora of old and new generation antidepressants.
Following efficacy and tolerability criteria (especially regarding the absence or a minimal increase in motor symptoms), other supported drugs for PD and depression comorbidities were bupropion (NE-DA reuptake inhibitor; Table 4; S33 and S45), mirtazapine (NEergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant; Table 4; S31 and S44), and tianeptine (glutamatergic modulator; Table 4; S35 and S48). Bupropion may be an ideal candidate given its dopaminergic action, lack of serotonergic activity, and subsequent low risk of Parkinsonism but may also induce psychotic symptoms [11, 42, 44]. A part from the revision from Costa and colleagues, no other specific studies addressing mirtazapine in PD patients have been found, but its extended use in psychogeriatric population is well known, which may be due to a higher antidepressant response of multitarget drugs such as mirtazapine and dual-action agents in neurodegenerative conditions [42, 54]. In spite of its relatively short marketing time, all participants agreed with the efficacy of tianeptine in depressed PD patients (Table 4; S35). This is accompanied by the previously observed decrease in Hamilton and BDI depression scales scores in the subgroup of PD patients treated with this drug, particularly in those with mild depressive, motor, and cognitive symptoms .
No conclusions could be drawn on whether agomelatine and trazodone constitute good treatment choices in this context (Table 4; S32, S37, S47 and S49). There is still little evidence on both drugs, but it is thought that agomelatine may bear double therapeutic potential as a safe antidepressant and a circadian rhythm regulator due to its novel melatonergic mechanism of action [56, 57].
There is also weak evidence supporting the role of anti-Parkinsonian drugs in depression treatment , although APA, EFNS/MDS-ES, and CNSF guidelines recommend them with substantial confidence [32, 44, 46]. The expert panel seconded the use of dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine) (Table 4; S34) as several controlled studies and meta-analyses have proven them effective in this scenario [5, 6, 58–60]. However, caution should be taken when prescribing them to PD patients. A recent study that was published after concluding the present Delphi survey showed that depression predisposes to the development of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in these patients and that this risk is magnified by dopamine agonists . Also, they should be replaced by other pharmacological options such as antidepressants when patients do not respond to 3 mg and 15 mg daily doses of pramipexole and ropinirole, respectively . Caution should also be taken when combining serotonergic medications with type B monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAO-BIs) such as selegiline to avoid serotonin syndrome (Table 4; S38) [31, 44, 62]. Unlike serotonin-enhancing antidepressants, tianeptine was considered safe together with Parkinson’s medication (Table 4; S39). Thus, personalized management of depression in PD is key to avoid drug interactions and side effects due to any coexisting therapies [31, 32, 40].
Main CPGs do not discard nonpharmacological therapies, but they specifically state that there is insufficient evidence to formally recommend them in patients with PD and depression [31, 32, 40, 44, 46]. Nonetheless, there is considerable amount of reported experience on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) by psychiatrists and, to a lesser extent, neurologists and geriatrists (data not shown). ECT is specifically used in patients with drug-refractory and life-threatening affective disorders (Table 4; S41) [5, 11, 63].
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is mostly indicated when symptoms of depression are mild . A controlled RCT assessing the efficacy of CBT versus clinical management alone in PD patients observed significant improvements in cognitive and behavioural (but not somatic) symptoms of depression , which may have required antidepressant prescription. Consensus on its appropriateness in PD patients was achieved in this study (Table 4; S36), and it may well be considered when antidepressants are contraindicated or undesired .
This Delphi-based study provides an expert opinion on the aetiology and clinical manifestations of depression in PD and offers specific diagnostic and treatment hints (Figure 2). In summary, the presence of depressive symptoms was considered a PD risk factor, but it should not be used as a surrogate of motor symptom exacerbation during the progression of the disease. Female gender, older age, and brain structural factors together with neurotransmitter depletion could contribute to the development of depression in the context of PD. Thus, PD patients should be systematically screened for depression and anxiety, the diagnostic of which can be aided using clinical scales such as the GDS. Anhedonia and apathy should be ruled out as they are not necessarily linked to depression. The latter is characterized by the presence of affective symptoms of hopelessness, sadness, and suicidal thoughts or dysphoria.
Regardless of the clinical severity, symptoms of depression require treatment. SSRIs, SNRIs, vortioxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine, tianeptine, and dopamine agonists were considered efficacious and well-tolerated pharmacological options for depression in PD. TCAs and combining MAO-BIs with serotonergic antidepressants should be of limited use in this context due to significant side effects. ECT is especially indicated for severe and drug-refractory cases, whereas CBT constitutes a nonpharmacological option worth exploring in patients with mild depression. Future large-scale studies are needed to consolidate this information and recommendations for depression in PD.
The datasets used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Agüera-Ortiz has received grants from and served as consultant, advisor, or CME speaker for Janssen-Cilag, Exeltis, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Neuraxpharm, Sanofi-Aventis, and Servier. Dr. López-Álvarez has prepared a monograph on this Delphi consensus with the financial help of Exeltis Pharmaceuticals Holding S.L. Dr. Montes has received grants from and served as consultant, advisor, or CME speaker for Almirall, Angelini, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Qualigen, Recordati, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM). Dr. Grandas received honoraria for lecturing from Abbvie, Zambon, Exeltis, and Teva as well as research grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish Ministry of Health) and the European Commission (Horizon 2020).
The authors would like to acknowledge the medical writing services provided by Neus Cantariño, MSc, from Trialance SCCL (Spain). Exeltis Pharmaceuticals Holding, S.L., Manuel Pombo Angulo street, 28, 3rd floor, 28050, Madrid, has given support to the Scientific Committee to finance all meetings and required logistics to carry out this Delphi study, without interfering with its design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation or the preparation of this manuscript.
- D. Weintraub, P. J. Moberg, J. E. Duda, I. R. Katz, and M. B. Stern, “Effect of psychiatric and other nonmotor symptoms on disability in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 784–788, May 2004.
- D. Weintraub, “Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease,” Neurotherapeutics, 2020.
- J. S. A. M. Reijnders, U. Ehrt, W. E. J. Weber, D. Aarsland, and A. F. G. Leentjens, “A systematic review of prevalence studies of depression in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2008.
- D. Weintraub, P. J. Moberg, J. E. Duda, I. R. Katz, and M. B. Stern, “Recognition and treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 178–183, 2003.
- S. E. Starkstein and S. Brockman, “Management of depression in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review,” Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 470–477, 2017.
- K. Seppi, K. Ray Chaudhuri, M. Coelho et al., “Update on treatments for nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease-an evidence‐based medicine review,” Movement Disorders, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 180–198, 2019.
- Z. Goodarzi, B. Mele, S. Guo et al., “Guidelines for dementia or Parkinson's disease with depression or anxiety: a systematic review,” BMC Neurology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 244, 2016.
- R. Boulkedid, H. Abdoul, M. Loustau, O. Sibony, and C. Alberti, “Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20476, 2011.
- A. Hutchings, R. Raine, C. Sanderson, and N. Black, “A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines,” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 218–224, 2006.
- R. L. Custer, J. A. Scarcella, and B. R. Stewart, “The modified Delphi technique - a rotational modification,” Journal of Career and Technical Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 1999.
- L. Agüera-Ortiz, M. D. Claver-Martín, M. D. Franco-Fernández et al., “Depression in the elderly. Consensus statement of the Spanish psychogeriatric association,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 11, p. 380, 2020.
- M.-R. Luquin, J. Kulisevsky, P. Martinez-Martin, P. Mir, and E. S. Tolosa, “Consensus on the definition of advanced Parkinson's disease: a neurologists-based Delphi study (CEPA study),” Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2017, Article ID 4047392, 8 pages, 2017.
- L. A. Goodman, “Snowball sampling,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 148–170, 1961.
- N. C. Dalkey, The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1969.
- E. L. Jacob, N. M. Gatto, A. Thompson, Y. Bordelon, and B. Ritz, “Occurrence of depression and anxiety prior to Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 576–581, 2010.
- S. Wang, S. Mao, D. Xiang, and C. Fang, “Association between depression and the subsequent risk of Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 86, pp. 186–192, 2018.
- B. A. Fernie, M. M. Spada, and R. G. Brown, “Motor fluctuations and psychological distress in Parkinson's disease,” Health Psychology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 518–526, 2019.
- S. E. Pålhagen, M. Carlsson, E. Curman, J. Wålinder, and A.-K. Granérus, “Depressive illness in Parkinson's disease - indication of a more advanced and widespread neurodegenerative process?” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 295–304, 2008.
- R. M. J. van der Velden, M. P. G. Broen, M. L. Kuijf, and A. F. G. Leentjens, “Frequency of mood and anxiety fluctuations in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: a systematic review,” Movement Disorders, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1521–1527, 2018.
- M. H. M. Timmer, M. H. C. T. van Beek, B. R. Bloem, and R. A. J. Esselink, “What a neurologist should know about depression in Parkinson's disease,” Practical Neurology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 359–368, 2017.
- A. J. Petkus, J. V. Filoteo, D. M. Schiehser, M. E. Gomez, and G. Petzinger, “Worse cognitive performance predicts increased anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: a bidirectional analysis,” Neuropsychology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2019.
- Y.-H. Wu, Y.-H. Chen, M.-H. Chang, and C.-H. Lin, “Depression in Parkinson's disease: a case-control study,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 2, Article ID e0192050, 2018.
- L. Pinto, C. Alva Diaz, and L. Torres, “Factores asociados a síntomas depresivos en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson,” Medicina Clínica, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 119-120, 2018.
- M. Ryan, C. V. Eatmon, and J. T. Slevin, “Drug treatment strategies for depression in Parkinson disease,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1351–1363, 2019.
- J. Borgonovo, C. Allende-Castro, A. Laliena, N. Guerrero, H. Silva, and M. L. Concha, “Changes in neural circuitry associated with depression at pre-clinical, pre-motor and early motor phases of Parkinson's disease,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 35, pp. 17–24, 2017.
- R. Levy and B. Dubois, “Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 916–928, 2006.
- P. Robert, K. L. Lanctôt, L. Agüera-Ortiz et al., “Is it time to revise the diagnostic criteria for apathy in brain disorders? The 2018 international consensus group,” European Psychiatry, vol. 54, pp. 71–76, 2018.
- A. Berardelli, G. K. Wenning, A. Antonini et al., “EFNS/MDS-ES recommendations for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 16–34, 2013.
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Parkinson’s Disease: A National Clinical Guideline, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Edinburgh, Scotland, 2010.
- D. G. Grosset, G. J. A. Macphee, and M. Nairn, “Diagnosis and pharmacological management of Parkinson's disease: summary of SIGN guidelines,” BMJ, vol. 340, no. 12 2, Article ID b5614, 2010.
- Royal College of Physicians, “National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (National Institute for Health and clinical evidence (NICE)),” Parkinson’s Disease: National Clinical Guideline for Diagnosis and Management in Primary and Secondary Care, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK, 2006.
- D. Grimes et al., “‘Supplement 4: Canadian guidelines on Parkinson’s disease’,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. S1–S30, 2012.
- T. Patel, F. Chang, and P. S. Canada, “Parkinson's disease guidelines for pharmacists,” Canadian Pharmacists Journal/Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 161–170, 2014.
- S. Kadhim, T. Pringsheim, A. Le et al., “Validating screening tools for depression in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1184–1186, 2018.
- E. Bomasang-Layno, I. Fadlon, A. N. Murray, and S. Himelhoch, “Antidepressive treatments for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 833–842, 2015.
- K. A. Mills, M. C. Greene, R. Dezube, C. Goodson, T. Karmarkar, and G. M. Pontone, “Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 642–651, 2018.
- L. Troeung, S. J. Egan, and N. Gasson, “A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled treatment trials for depression and anxiety in Parkinson's disease,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79510, 2013.
- G. Shoval, B. Stubbs, R. D. Balicer et al., “Low adherence to antidepressants is associated with increased mortality in Parkinson disease patients,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, vol. 43, pp. 92–96, 2017.
- F. L. Rocha, M. G. Murad, B. P. Stumpf, C. Hara, and C. Fuzikawa, “Antidepressants for depression in Parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Psychopharmacology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 417–423, 2013.
- 2014, Working group of the clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with Parkinson’s disease-Spanish NHS, clinical practice Guideline for the Management of Patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ministry of Health, Social Services, and Equality. Institute of Health Sciences of Aragon.
- A. Price, L. Rayner, E. Okon-Rocha et al., “Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 82, no. 8, pp. 914–923, 2011.
- F. H. d. R. Costa, A. L. Z. Rosso, H. Maultasch, D. H. Nicaretta, and M. B. Vincent, “Depression in Parkinson's disease: diagnosis and treatment,” Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 617–620, 2012.
- M. Menza, R. D. Dobkin, H. Marin et al., “A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression,” Neurology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 886–892, 2009.
- A. J. Gelenberg et al., Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder, American Psychiatry Association, Washington, DC, USA, Third Edition edition, 2010.
- E. Delgado Silveira, B. Montero Errasquín, M. Muñoz García et al., “Mejorando la prescripción de medicamentos en las personas mayores: una nueva edición de los criterios STOPP-START,” Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2015.
- J. J. Ferreira, R. Katzenschlager, B. R. Bloem et al., “Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2013.
- J. M. Hawthorne and C. F. Caley, “Extrapyramidal reactions associated with serotonergic antidepressants,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1136–1152, 2015.
- M. Y. Guo, M. Etminan, R. M. Procyshyn et al., “Association of antidepressant use with drug-related extrapyramidal symptoms,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 349–356, 2018.
- A. Revet, F. Montastruc, A. Roussin, J.-P. Raynaud, M. Lapeyre-Mestre, and T. T. H. Nguyen, “Antidepressants and movement disorders: a postmarketing study in the world pharmacovigilance database,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 308, 2020.
- I. H. Richard, M. P. McDermott, R. Kurlan et al., “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson disease,” Neurology, vol. 78, no. 16, pp. 1229–1236, 2012.
- M. Takahashi, H. Tabu, A. Ozaki, T. Hamano, and T. Takeshima, “Antidepressants for depression, apathy, and gait instability in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter randomized study,” Internal Medicine, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 361–368, 2019.
- G. Crépeau-Gendron, H. K. Brown, C. Shorey et al., “Association between citalopram, escitalopram and QTc prolongation in a real-world geriatric setting,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 250, pp. 341–345, 2019.
- G. S. Alexopoulos, “Pharmacotherapy for late-life depression,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 72, no. 01, p. e04, 2011.
- S. Psychogeriatric Society (SEPG), [Consensus on Depression in the Elderly, Marketing Aid Systems & Services SL, Barcelona, 2 edition, 2019.
- O. S. Levin, “Coaxil (tianeptine) in the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease,” Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 419–424, 2007.
- D. De Berardis, M. Fornaro, N. Serroni et al., “Agomelatine treatment of major depressive disorder in Parkinson's disease: a case series,” The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 343–345, 2013.
- A. Avila, X. Cardona, M. Martin-Baranera et al., “Agomelatine for depression in Parkinson disease,” Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 719–723, 2015.
- P. Barone, L. Scarzella, R. Marconi et al., “Pramipexole versus sertraline in the treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 253, no. 5, pp. 601–607, 2006.
- P. Barone et al., “‘Pramipexole for the treatment of depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial’,” Lancet Neurol, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 573–580, 2010.
- H.-t. Wang, L. Wang, Y. He, and G. Yu, “Rotigotine transdermal patch for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 393, pp. 31–38, 2018.
- J. Marín-Lahoz, F. Sampedro, S. Martinez-Horta, J. Pagonabarraga, and J. Kulisevsky, “Depression as a risk factor for impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 762–769, 2019.
- E. Peña, M. Mata, L. López-Manzanares et al., “Antidepressants in Parkinson's disease. Recommendations by the movement disorder study group of the Neurological Association of Madrid,” Neurología (English Edition), vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 395–402, 2018.
- A. Borisovskaya, W. C. Bryson, J. Buchholz, A. Samii, and S. Borson, “Electroconvulsive therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease: systematic review of evidence and recommendations,” Neurodegenerative Disease Management, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–176, 2016.
- R. D. Dobkin, S. L. Mann, A. Interian, M. A. Gara, and M. Menza, “Cognitive behavioral therapy improves diverse profiles of depressive symptoms in Parkinson's disease,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 722–729, 2019.
Copyright © 2021 Luis Agüera-Ortiz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.