Physics Research International

Physics Research International / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Advances in Novel Optical Materials and Devices

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 798906 |

Kailash Kasala, Kalaichelvi Saravanamuttu, "Coaxial Self-Trapping of White and Gray Regions of an Incandescent Field: A Bright Core with a Dark Cladding", Physics Research International, vol. 2012, Article ID 798906, 5 pages, 2012.

Coaxial Self-Trapping of White and Gray Regions of an Incandescent Field: A Bright Core with a Dark Cladding

Academic Editor: Michael R. Gleeson
Received14 May 2012
Accepted23 Jul 2012
Published09 Sep 2012


We report the generation of a self-trapped incoherent hybrid beam comprising a dark-sheathed bright core. The hybrid beam originates from refractive index changes in a photocrosslinkable organosiloxane, which allow simultaneous and cooperative self-trapping of a gray ring with a white core embedded in a broad incandescent beam. The core narrowed and increased in intensity while the encircling gray ring decreased in intensity until rendered very dark. This dark sheath improves light confinement in the bright core and protects it from interactions with nearby self-trapped filaments. This is the first example of a self-trapped hybrid beam, which is moreover spatially and temporally incoherent.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we report that a new self-trapped spatially and temporally incoherent species—a hybrid beam—forms in a photocrosslinkable organosiloxane [1, 2]. This photopolymer, which undergoes free-radical polymerization and a corresponding increase in refractive index upon irradiation, can be classified as a self-focusing medium (Figure 1). The hybrid beam forms when an incandescent beam embedded with a gray ring propagates through the photopolymer. Refractive index changes (Δn) along the beam path lead to self-trapping of the white core into a narrow, intense bright beam. Simultaneously, the gray ring is depleted of intensity by the self-trapped bright core and self-traps into a very dark sheath. The decreased intensity and lack of divergence of the sheath is the signature of self-trapping dark beams [3].

Our finding is counter-intuitive because it shows for the first time that self-trapped bright and dark regions can coexist within the same optical field. Until now, self-trapped bright and dark beams could only be generated separately under the opposite conditions of self-focusing [4, 5] and self-defocusing [3], respectively. For example, self-trapped bright incoherent beams can be generated in a photorefractive crystal under self-focusing conditions, in which Δn increases with intensity [4, 5]. By contrast, self-trapped dark incoherent beams must be generated under self-defocusing conditions [3]. Here, an incoherent beam bearing a dark depression (dip) propagating in an appropriately biased photorefractive crystal induces the greatest Δn along the path of the dip. The consequent defocusing of the bright background into the greater index (dark) regions counteracts the divergence of the dip and in this way, generates a self-trapped dark beam [3].

The hybrid beam in our study was created with incandescent light, which is incoherent in space and time. Self-trapping of a wavepacket with such poor correlation of phase and amplitude was experimentally discovered in 1997 [5]. The finding raised fundamental questions about the spatial correlation [6], shape [7], frequency distribution [8], and modulation instability (MI) [9] of incoherent white light. Self-trapping of white light was first demonstrated in a photorefractive crystal, which at very low intensities exhibits a noninstantaneous and saturable photoresponse [5]. These critical properties permit copropagation of the multiple modes of white light and time-average out its femtosecond phase fluctuations, respectively.

We have shown that such a saturable and noninstantaneous photoresponse is inherent to the organosiloxane photopolymer [2]. Spatial and temporal variations of Δn in the photopolymer can be described through [10]: Δ𝑛(𝑟,𝑧,𝑡)=Δ𝑛𝑠11exp𝑈00𝑡𝑟||||𝐸(𝑡)2,𝑑𝑡(1) where Δ𝑛𝑠 is the maximum index change of 1.46 [1] (at saturation), 𝑈0 is the critical exposure (total energy) required to initiate polymerisation, 𝜏 is the monomer radical lifetime (assumed to be negligible), and |𝐸(𝑡)|2 is the square of the electric field amplitude of the incident optical field. We previously reported that the photoresponse of the polymer medium allowed self-trapping of individual incandescent light beams. Studies in this photopolymer also provided insight into the intensity-dependent dynamics, interactions [11], MI [12], and spontaneously formed lattices of self-trapped white beams [13]. We now find that the photopolymer permits simultaneous, coaxial propagation of a bright core and dark sheath as a hybrid beam.

In a typical experiment, a broad, collimated beam of white light (background beam) from a quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp (4 mW) was passed through an amplitude mask, which introduced a weakly dark (gray) ring (Figure 2(a)). The ring-embedded background beam was launched into a transparent cuvette containing an organosiloxane photopolymer gel, which was doped with a titanocene photoinitiator (𝜆max = 393 nm, 460 nm) to sensitise it to visible light [2]. At the entrance face (propagation distance (𝑧) = 0.0 mm), the gray ring had an outer diameter (od) of 350 μm, while its white core had a FWHM diameter of 220 μm. The relative intensity of the ring was 44% while that of the core and background was 50%. The beam profile at 𝑧 = 6.0 mm in the photopolymer was imaged with a CCD camera. At early times (when polymerization was negligible), the natural divergence of the background beam causes significant broadening of the ring and core with propagation from 𝑧 = 0.0 mm to 𝑧 = 6.0 mm. Based on the spatial correlation length (𝑙𝑐) = 0.31 μm for the central wavelength (600 nm) of our incandescent source, the bright core can be calculated using 𝜃𝜆/𝜋𝑙9𝑐 to diverge to 20-fold its original width at 𝑧 = 6.00 mm. The decrease in intensity due to the extensive divergence of the core diminished its contrast with the grey ring to the extent that at 𝑧 = 6.0 mm, the beam appeared effectively uniform with a relative intensity of ~40% (Figure 2(b)). This significant divergence, which erases any distinction between dark and bright regions of the optical field, is characteristic of incandescent light and originates from its random and rapid phase fluctuations [14].

Experimental results in Figure 2 show the evolution of the spatial intensity profile of the ring-bearing incandescent beam at z = 6.0 mm. 2D and 3D intensity profiles are shown; for clarity, both a top-down 3D view tracing the intensity increase of the white core and a bottom-up 3D view tracing the depletion of intensity from the gray ring are presented. Over time, polymerization and consequent refractive index changes (Δn) along the beam propagation path caused self-trapping of both the gray ring and its white core. At 36 s, self-trapping of the white core was indicated by a decrease in width to 141 μm and increase in relative intensity from 40% to 60%. Simultaneous self-trapping of the gray ring was evidenced through the emergence of a well-defined dark ring with od = 410 μm. Characteristic of self-trapped dark beams, the gray ring showed a decrease in relative intensity from 40% to 31% (Figure 2(c)). This dark- sheathed bright core propagated coaxially without significant divergence as a self-trapped hybrid beam.

Over time, the dark sheath of the hybrid beam continued to darken even as its core increased in intensity. The contrast between the sheath and core maximized at 72 s at relative intensities of 12% and 100%, respectively (Figure 2(e)). At this time, the core was only 105 μm wide, while the ring od was 440 μm. Although the core later decreased in intensity with a concomitant (slight) increase in width (characteristic of individual self-trapped white beams) [1], (Figures 2(f) and 2(g)) both the ring and core remained self-trapped. Figure 2(h) shows that at ~1200 s, the widths of the ring and core were 440 μm and 90 μm, respectively. This confirmed that the self-trapped hybrid beam was stable and nontransient.

To explain its mechanism of formation, we first reason that self-trapping of the core of the hybrid beam follows the same process as self-trapping of an individual white beam in the photopolymer [1]. The latter was extensively studied and described elsewhere [1]. Briefly, the core induces noninstantaneous and saturable refractive index changes along its propagation path. This results in a multimode waveguide, which permits self-consistent propagation and self-trapping of the core as observed in Figure 2. Temporal plots in Figures 3(a) and 3(b) trace the decrease in width and increase in intensity of the self-trapping core. Notably, these plots follow the same trend that was previously observed for an individual self-trapped incandescent beam. This includes the slight increase in width and decrease in intensity at late times when Δn of the self-induced waveguide approaches saturation [1]. However, the white core remains self-trapped and never reverts to its original diverged form over long times (>1200 s) (Figure 2).

The critical difference in the current study is that the same conditions that cause self-trapping and an increase in intensity of the core elicit self-trapping and a decrease in intensity of the gray ring. To explain this dichotomy, we consider that according to (1), the most intense regions of the optical field (i.e., the bright core and background beam) induce the greatest values of Δn in the photopolymer. These bright regions, which have the same initial intensity at z = 0.0 mm, must initiate comparable rates of polymerization. The positive Δn values induced in these regions are therefore similar and suppress the divergence of the core and background beam. While this can be directly observed as self-trapping of the core (Figure 2), similar changes to the background beam are not as evident. This is because the background illuminates nearly the entire photopolymer sample and changes to its boundaries cannot be easily detected (vide infra). However, as the core and the background now propagate without divergence, the embedded gray ring is essentially “held” in focus all along the propagation axis. No longer divergent, the ring effectively self-traps and becomes visible at z = 6.0 mm (Figure 2(c)).

The mechanism described above is confirmed by comparing the temporal variation in the widths of the core and gray ring (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). The plots show that the ring and core self-trap simultaneously within the same time scale: in the first 30 s, the ring and core suffer the greatest decrease in width to 410 μm and 141 μm, respectively. This is consistent with the notion that self-trapping and divergence-free propagation of the bright regions of the optical field causes concomitant self-trapping of the embedded gray ring.

During self-trapping, light intensity spontaneously flows from the gray ring to the core until maximum contrast is achieved between the two. The intensity transfer from the ring to the core is evident in their temporal plots of intensity (Figures 3(b) and 3(d)): at early times, the core increases in intensity from 40% to 99% by depleting the ring of intensity during the same period from 40% to 12%. This results in the simultaneous formation of a self-trapped bright core and self-trapped dark ring (Figure 2). The intensity flow form the ring to the core originates from differences in their photoinduced refractive indices: according to (1), Δn in the photopolymer is intensity-dependent. Δn induced by the gray ring is therefore smaller than that induced by the white core. The resulting gradient in refractive index between the two regions triggers the flow of intensity from the lower-index ring to the higher-index core. As its intensity increases, the core induces even greater values of Δn and attracts additional intensity from the ring. A cycle is established in which the core continually grows in intensity by depleting the ring, which reaches a minimum intensity of 12% at 72 s (Figures 2(e) and 3(d)). Intensity transfer ceases when Δn of the core approaches saturation. At this time, similar to individual self-trapped white beams [1], the core intensity decreases together with a slight increase in its width (Figures 2(f) and 3(b)). While the ring shows a corresponding increase in width, it remains dark and does not undergo any further significant changes (Figures 2(f) and 3(d)).

Our findings indicate that the hybrid beam originates from simultaneous self-trapping and cooperative interactions of the gray ring and white core. Once the hybrid beam is formed, the background beam, which as mentioned above also induces index changes, undergoes an entirely different type of nonlinear behaviour, modulation instability (MI) [12]. By 210 s, the uniform background spontaneously divided into multiple filaments (Figure 2(f)). The filaments, which are akin to individual self-trapped beams, were approximately 80 μm wide with ~74% relative intensity. They originate from noise such as random, weak amplitude variations, which become amplified due to polymerization and render the beam unstable. The beam stabilizes by spontaneously dividing into multiple filaments [12].  We note that although they originate in the same medium under identical conditions, MI-induced filaments form at a later time (210 s) than the self-trapped bright core (36 s). This is because the dark ring serves as a low-index sheath, which enhances light confinement in the core. This in turn increases the rate and efficiency of self-trapping of the core relative to MI-induced filaments. Furthermore, although filaments immediately surrounding the dark rings were within interacting distance [11] with the self-trapped core (Figure 2(e)), no interactions (e.g., fusion) were observed. We previously showed that interactions between self-trapped white light beams rely on index changes induced by their overlapping optical fields [11]. In the current study, the smaller index of the dark sheath inhibits such overlap and protects the bright core from interactions.

In summary, this to our knowledge is the first report of a self-trapped hybrid beam, which moreover is generated with spatially and temporally incoherent light. The hybrid beam originates from the simultaneous and cooperative self-trapping of a gray ring and its bright core embedded in a broad incandescent beam. The core grows by depleting the ring of most of its intensity and rendering it very dark. Like the cladding of an optical fiber, the dark, low-index sheath enhances light confinement in the core and protects it from interactions. The hybrid beam opens entirely new opportunities to manipulate the confinement and interactions of self-trapped beams through designed introduction of gray and white regions in an optical field. Importantly, they would be accessible with other inexpensive and miniature incoherent light sources such as LEDs. Because of its spatial and temporal incoherence, the hybrid beam also raises intriguing questions about the coherence structure of the dark ring and its bright core.


Funding from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Institute of Technology and McMaster University is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank CIBA for generous donation of IRGACURE-784.


  1. K. Saravanamuttu, X. M. Du, S. I. Najafi, and M. P. Andrews, “Photoinducd structural relaxation and densification in sol-gel-derived nanocomposite thin films: implications for integrated optics device fabrication,” Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1717–1729, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. Zhang and K. Saravanamuttu, “The dynamics of self-trapped beams of incoherent white light in a free-radical photopolymerizable medium,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 46, pp. 14913–14923, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Z. Chen, M. Mitchell, M. Segev, T. H. Coskun, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Self-trapping of dark incoherent light beams,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5365, pp. 889–891, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Mitchell, Z. Chen, M.-F. Shih, and M. Segev, “Self-trapping of partially spatially incoherent light,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 490–493, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Mitchell and M. Segev, “Self-trapping of incoherent white light,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6636, pp. 880–883, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Buljan, A. Šiber, M. Soljačić, and M. Segev, “Propagation of incoherent “white” light and modulation instability in noninstantaneous nonlinear media,” Physical Review E, vol. 66, no. 3, Article ID 035601, 4 pages, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Buljan, A. Šiber, M. Soljačić, T. Schwartz, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Incoherent white light solitons in logarithmically saturable noninstantaneous nonlinear media,” Physical Review E, vol. 68, no. 3, part 2, Article ID 036607, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. H. Buljan, M. Segev, M. Soljačić, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “White-light solitons,” Optics Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 1239–1241, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. T. Schwartz, T. Carmon, H. Buljan, and M. Segev, “Spontaneous pattern formation with incoherent white light,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 22, Article ID 223901, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. S. Kewitsch and A. Yariv, “Self-focusing and self-trapping of optical beams upon photopolymerization,” Optics Letters, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 24–26, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Kasala and K. Saravanamuttu, “An experimental study of the interactions of self-trapped white light beams in a photopolymer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 5, Article ID 051111, 3 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. B. Burgess, W. E. Shimmell, and K. Saravanamuttu, “Spontaneous pattern formation due to modulation instability of incoherent white light in a photopolymerizable medium,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 15, pp. 4738–4746, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. I. B. Burgess, M. R. Ponte, and K. Saravanamuttu, “Spontaneous formation of 3-D optical and structural lattices from two orthogonal and mutually incoherent beams of white light propagating in a photopolymerisable material,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 35, pp. 4133–4139, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, University of Rochester, New York, NY, USA, 7th edition, 1999.

Copyright © 2012 Kailash Kasala and Kalaichelvi Saravanamuttu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.