Table of Contents
Physics Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 152846, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/152846
Research Article

Modified Theories of Gravitation behind the Spacetime Deformation

Ambartsumian Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory, Aragatsotn, 378433 Byurakan, Armenia

Received 6 June 2014; Revised 1 September 2014; Accepted 11 September 2014

Academic Editor: Bennie F. L. Ward

Copyright © 2015 Gagik Ter-Kazarian. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Utiyama, “Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction,” Physical Review Letters, Physical Review, and Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 101, pp. 1597–1607, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. T. W. B. Kibble, “Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 212–221, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. D. W. Sciama, “On the analog between charge and spin in general relativity,” in Recent Developments in General Relativity, Festschrift for Leopold Infeld, p. 415, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. W. Sciama, “The physical structure of general relativity,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 463–469, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Papapetrou, “Einstein's theory of gravitation and flat space,” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, vol. 52, pp. 11–23, 1948. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. A. Papapetrou, “Spinning test-particles in general relativity. I,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 209, no. 1097, pp. 248–258, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Papapetrou, Lectures on General Relativity, Reidel D, 1974.
  8. A. Trautman, “On the structure of the EinsteinCartan equations,” in Differential Geometry, vol. 12 of Symposia Mathematica, pp. 139–162, Academic Press, London, UK, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  9. J.-P. Francoise, G. L. Naber, and S. T. Tsou, Eds., Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2006.
  10. B. Kuchowicz, “Two-component neutrino field and spherical symmetry in a space-time with curvature and torsion,” Physics Letters A, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 267–268, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. S. Stelle and P. C. West, “De Sitter gauge invariance and the geometry of the Einstein-Cartan theory,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. L205–L210, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. K. S. Stelle and P. C. West, “Spontaneously broken de Sitter symmetry and the gravitational holonomy group,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1466–1488, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, “Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry,” Physics Reports C, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 213–393, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. F. W. Hehl and B. K. Datta, “Nonlinear spinor equation and asymmetric connection in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, pp. 1334–1339, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester, “General relativity with spin and torsion: foundations and prospect,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 393–416, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. F. W. Hehl and J. D. McCrea, “Bianchi identities and the automatic conservation of energy-momentum and angular momentum in general-relativistic field theories,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 267–293, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. F. W. Hehl, E. A. Lord, and L. L. Smalley, “Metric-affine variational principles in general relativity II. Relaxation of the RIEmannian constraint,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1037–1056, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne'eman, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,” Physics Reports, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 1–171, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. A. B. Borisov and V. I. Ogievetskii, “Theory of dynamical affine and conformal symmetries as the theory of the gravitational field,” Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1179–1188, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. W. MacDowell and F. Mansouri, “Unified geometric theory of gravity and supergravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 739–742, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. F. Mansouri and L. N. Chang, “Gravitation as a gauge theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3192–3200, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. F. Mansouri, “Conformal gravity as a gauge theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 42, no. 16, pp. 1021–1024, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Schweizer and N. Straumann, “Poincaré gauge theory of gravitation and the binary pulsar 1913 + 16,” Physics Letters A, vol. 71, no. 5-6, pp. 493–495, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Schweizer, N. Straumann, and A. Wipf, “Post-Newtonian generation of gravitational waves in a theory of gravity with torsion,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 951–961, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. G. Grignani and G. Nardelli, “Gravity and the Poincaré group,” Physical Review D, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 2719–2731, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. L. N. Chang and F. Mansouri, “Nonlinear gauge fields and the structure of gravity and supergravity theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3168–3178, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. E. A. Ivanov and V. I. Ogievetsky, “Gauge theories as theories of spontaneous breakdown,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 309–313, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Ne'eman and T. Regge, “Gravity and supergravity as gauge theories on a group manifold,” Physics Letters B, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 54–56, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Neeman and D. J. Sijacki, “Unified affine gauge theory of gravity and strong interactions with finite and infinite overline GL(4, R) spinor fields,” Annals of Physics, vol. 120, pp. 292–315, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  30. Y. Ne'eman and D. Šijački, “World spinors—construction and some applications,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1105–1122, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. M. Toller, “Classical field theory in the space of reference frames,” II Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 67–98, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  32. G. Cognola, E. Soldati, M. Toller, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, “Theories of gravitation in the space of reference frames,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 325–348, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. J. Niederle and E. A. Ivanov, “Gauge formulation of gravitation theories. I. The Poincaré, de Sitter, and conformal cases,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 976–987, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. P. G. Bergmann, V. de Sabbata, G. T. Gillies, P. I. Pronin, and A. Zichichi, Eds., Spin in Gravity: Is It Possible to Give an Experimental Basis to Torsion?: International School of Cosmology and Gravitation XV Course Erice, Italy 13–20 May 1997, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.
  35. V. de Sabbata and M. Gasperini, “Introduction to gravitation,” in Unified Field Theories of More Than Four Dimensions, V. de Sabbata and E. Schmutzer, Eds., World Scientific Publishers, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  36. V. de Sabbata and M. Gasperini, “On the Maxwell equations in a Riemann-Cartan space,” Physics Letters A, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 300–302, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. V. de Sabbata and C. Sivaram, Spin and Torsion in Gravitation, World Scientific Publishers, Singapore, 1994.
  38. J. Nitsch and F. W. Hehl, “Translational gauge theory of gravity: post-newtonian approximation and spin precession,” Physics Letters B, vol. 90, no. 1-2, pp. 98–102, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Ivanenko and G. A. Sardanashvily, “The gauge treatment of gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1–45, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  40. T. W. B. Kibble and K. S. Stelle, “Gauge theories of gravity and supergravity,” in Progress in Quantum Field Theory, H. Ezava and S. Kamefuchi, Eds., p. 57, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  41. C. Wiesendanger, “Poincaré gauge invariance and gravitation in Minkowski spacetime,” vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 681–700, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. F. Gronwald and F. W. Hehl, “On the gauge aspects of gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9602013.
  43. E. Cartan, “On a generalization of the notion of Riemann curvature and spaces with torsion,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, vol. 174, pp. 593–595, 1922. View at Google Scholar
  44. E. Cartan, “On manifolds with an affine connection and the theory of general relativity,” Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, vol. 40, pp. 325–412, 1923. View at Google Scholar
  45. E. Cartan, “Sur les variétés à connexion affine et la théorie de la relativité généralisée (première partie suite),” Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, vol. 41, pp. 1–25, 1924. View at Google Scholar
  46. E. Cartan, Sur les Variables a Connexion Affine et la Theorie de la Relativite Generalisee, Gauthier-Villard, Paris, France, 1955.
  47. Y. Ne'eman and F. W. Hehl, “Test matter in a spacetime with nonmetricity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 14, no. 1A, pp. A251–A259, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. E. W. Mielke, F. Gronwald, Y. N. Obukhov, R. Tresguerres, and F. W. Hehl, “Towards complete integrability of two-dimensional Poincaré gauge gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 3648–3662, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. E. W. Mielke, Y. N. Obukhov, and F. W. Hehl, “Yang-Mills configurations from 3D Riemann-Cartan geometry,” Physics Letters A, vol. 192, no. 2–4, pp. 153–162, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. E. W. Mielke, “Consistent coupling to Dirac fields in teleparallelism: comment on ‘metric-afflne approach to teleparallel gravity’,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 128501, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. Sternberg, Semi-Riemannian Geometry and General Relativity, 2003, http://www.math.harvard.edu/~shlomo/docs/semi_riemannian_geometry.pdf.
  52. M. Blagojevic, Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries, High Energy Physics, Cosmology and Gravitation, Edited by: B. Foster, L. Grishchuk , E. W. Kolb, M. A. H. MacCallum , D. H. Perkins and B. F. Schutz, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  53. E. A. Lord, “Poincaré gauge theory from self-coupling,” Pramana, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 359–368, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. T. Hammond, “Torsion gravity,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 599–649, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  55. R. Tresguerres, “Unified description of interactions in terms of composite fiber bundles,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 064025, 15 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  56. R. Tresguerres, “Translations and dynamics,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 905–946, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  57. A. Tiemblo and R. Tresguerres, “Gauge theories of gravity: the nonlinear framework,” Recent Research Developments in Physics, vol. 5, p. 1255, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  58. S. Capozziello and M. de Laurentis, “Gravity from local Poincaré gauge invariance,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  59. G. Basini and S. Capozziello, “A general covariant symplectic structure for gravitational, electromagnetic and Dirac fields,” International Journal of Modern Physics D: Gravitation, Astrophysics, Cosmology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 583–602, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  60. S. A. Ali, C. Cafaro, S. Capozziello, and C. Corda, “On the Poincaré gauge theory of gravitation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3426–3448, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. D. K. Wise, “MacDowell- mansouri gravity and cartan geometry,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 15, Article ID 155010, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. B. Coll, in Proceedings of the Spanish Relativity Meeting (ERES '98), Salamanca, Spain, 1998.
  63. B. Coll, J. Llosa, and D. Soler, “Three-dimensional metrics as deformations of a constant curvature metric,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 269–282, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. J. Llosa and D. Soler, “Reference frames and rigid motions in relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 3067–3094, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  65. J. Llosa and D. Soler, “On the degrees of freedom of a semi-Riemannian metric,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 893–908, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  66. J. Llosa and J. Carot, “Flat deformation theorem and symmetries in spacetime,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 5, Article ID 055013, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  67. S. Capozziello and C. Stornaiolo, “Space-time deformations as extended conformal transformations,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. J. Alfaro, D. Espriu, and D. Puigdomènech, “Spontaneous generation of geometry in four dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 025015, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. M. Blagojevic and F. W. Hehl, Eds., Gauge Theories of Gravitation: A Reader with Commentaries, Imperial College Press, 2013.
  70. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1963. View at MathSciNet
  71. J. Plebanski, “Forms and riemannian geometry,” in Proceedings of the International School of Cosmology and Gravitation, Erice, Italy, May 1972.
  72. A. Trautman, Differential Geometry for Physicists, Stony Brook Lectures, Bibliopolis, Napoli, Italia, 1984.
  73. F. W. Hehl, Y. Ne'eman, J. Nitsch, and P. von der Heyde, “Short-range confining component in a quadratic poincaré gauge theory of gravitation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 102–106, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  74. D. E. Neville, “Gravity Lagrangian with ghost-free curvature-squared terms,” Physical Review D, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 3535–3543, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. D. Neville, “Gravity theories with propagating torsion,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 867–873, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  76. D. E. Neville, “Spin-2 propagating torsion,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1244–1249, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. Sezgin and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “New ghost-free gravity Lagrangians with propagating torsion,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3269–3280, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  78. D. D. Ivanenko, P. I. Pronin, and G. A. Sardanasvily, The Gauge Gravitational Theory, Moscow Publishing House, 1985, (Russian).
  79. V. N. Ponomariev, A. O. Barvinsky, and Y. N. Obukhov, Geometrodynamica l Methods and Gauge Approach to Gravitational Theory, Moscow, Russia, Atomizdat, 1985, (Russian).
  80. J. Daum and M. Reuter, “Einstein-Cartan gravity, asymptotic safety, and the running Immirzi parameter,” Annals of Physics, vol. 334, pp. 351–419, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  81. E. W. Mielke, “Is Einstein-Cartan theory coupled to light Fermions asymptotically safe?” Journal of Gravity, vol. 2013, Article ID 812962, 5 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  82. G. Ter-Kazarian, “Two-step spacetime deformation-induced dynamical torsion,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 5, Article ID 055003, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  83. R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, An Introduction to Geometrical Physics, World Scientific Publishers, Singapore, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  84. R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, An Introduction to Teleparallel Gravity, Instituto de Fisica Teorica, UNSEP, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2007.
  85. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  86. H. I. Arcos, V. C. de Andrade, and J. G. Pereira, “Torsion and gravitation: a new view,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 807–818, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. H. I. Arcos and J. G. Pereira, “Torsion gravity,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2193–2240, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  88. R. Aldrovandi, P. B. Barros, and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitation as anholonomy,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 991–1005, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  89. R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira, and K. H. Vu, “Gravitation: global formulation and quantum effects,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 51–62, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  90. R. Aldrovandi, J. G. Pereira, and K. H. Vu, “Gravitation without the equivalence principle,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  91. R. Aldrovandi, L. C. T. Guillen, J. G. Pereira, and K. H. Vu, “Bringing together gravity and the quanta,” in Proceedings of the Albert Einstein Century International Conference, pp. 18–22, Paris, France, July 2005.
  92. V. C. de Andrade and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational Lorentz force and the description of the gravitational interaction,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 4689–4695, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  93. V. C. de Andrade, L. C. T. Guillen, and J. G. Pereira, “Teleparallel spin connection,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 2, Article ID 027502, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  94. N. J. Poplawski, “Propagating torsion in the Einstein frame,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 11, Article ID 112504, 7 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  95. W.-T. Ni, “Searches for the role of spin and polarization in gravity,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 73, Article ID 056901, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. W.-T. Ni, “A new theory of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 2880–2883, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. D. L. Lee, A. P. Lightman, and W. T. Ni, “Conservation laws and variational principles in metric theories of gravity,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 10, pp. 1685–1700, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  98. W. T. Ni, “Equivalence principles and electromagnetism,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 301–304, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  99. W.-T. Ni, “Their empirical foundations, and the role of precision experiments to test them,” in Proceedings of the International School and Symposium on Precision Measurement and Gravity Experiment, W.-T. Ni, Ed., p. 491, National Tsing Hua University, Taipei, Taiwan, 1983.
  100. A. B. Balakin and W.-T. Ni, “Non-minimal coupling of photons and axions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 5, Article ID 055003, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  101. G. T. Ter-Kazarian, “Gravitation and inertia; a rearrangement of vacuum in gravity,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 327, no. 1, pp. 91–109, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. L. S. Pontryagin, Continous Groups, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1984.
  103. B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov, and A. T. Fomenko, Contemporary Geometry, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1986.
  104. S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, “Structure of phenomenological lagrangians. I,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2239–2247, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. C. G. Callan, S. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, “Structure of phenomenological lagrangians. II,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2247–2250, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. S. Weinberg, Brandeis Lectures, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1970.
  107. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, “Nonlinear realizations. II. Conformal symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 184, pp. 1760–1768, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  108. C. J. Isham, A. Salam, and J. Strathdee, “Nonlinear realizations of space-time symmetries. Scalar and tensor gravity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 62, pp. 98–119, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  109. D. V. Volkov, “Phenomenological Lagrangians,” Soviet Journal of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 4, pp. 1–17, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  110. V. I. Ogievetsky, “Nonlinear realizations of internal and space-time symmetries,” in Proceedings of the 10th Winter School of Theoretical Physics, Wroclaw, Poland, 1974.
  111. F. W. Hehl, J. Lemke, and E. W. Mielke, “Two lectures on fermions and gravity,” in Geometry and Theoretical Physics, J. Debrus and A. C. Hirshfeld, Eds., pp. 56–140, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Metric-affine approach to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, 044016, 17 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  113. Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Lessons of spin and torsion: reply to “Consistent coupling to Dirac fields in teleparallelism”,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 128502, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. J. W. Maluf, “Dirac spinor fields in the teleparallel gravity: comment on Metric-affine approach to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, Article ID 108501, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  115. I. M. Singer, “Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  116. R. Tresguerres, “Exact vacuum solutions of 4-dimensional metric-affine gauge theories of gravitation,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 347–354, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. R. Tresguerres, “Exact static vacuum solution of four-dimensional metric-affine gravity with nontrivial torsion,” Physics Letters A, vol. 200, no. 6, pp. 405–410, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  118. J. K. Ho, D. Chern, and J. M. Nester, “Some spherically symmetric exact solutions of the metric-affine gravity theory,” Chinese Journal of Physics, vol. 35, pp. 640–650, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  119. W.-T. Ni, “Constraints on pseudoscalar-photon interaction from CMB polarization observation,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 172, no. 49, pp. 175–178, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  120. F. W. Hehl, G. D. Kerlick, and P. von der Heyde, “On a new metric affine theory of gravitation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 446–448, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  121. J. D. McCrea, F. W. Hehl, and E. W. Mielke, “Mapping Noether identities into Bianchi identities in general relativistic theories of gravity and in the field theory of static lattice defects,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1185–1206, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  122. P. Baekler and F. W. Hehl, “Beyond Einstein-Cartan gravity: quadratic torsion and curvature invariants with even and odd parity including all boundary terms,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 21, Article ID 215017, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus