Research Article  Open Access
Vibration Analysis of EulerBernoulli Beams Partially Immersed in a Viscous Fluid
Abstract
The vibrational characteristics of a microbeam are well known to strongly depend on the fluid in which the beam is immersed. In this paper, we present a detailed theoretical study of the modal analysis of microbeams partially immersed in a viscous fluid. A fixedfree microbeam vibrating in a viscous fluid is modeled using the EulerBernoulli equation for the beams. The unsteady Stokes equations are solved using a Helmholtz decomposition technique in a twodimensional plane containing the microbeams cross sections. The symbolic software Mathematica is used in order to find the coupled vibration frequencies of beams with two portions. The frequency equation is deduced and analytically solved. The finite element method using Comsol Multiphysics software results is compared with present method for validation and an acceptable match between them was obtained. In the eigenanalysis, the frequency equation is generated by satisfying all boundary conditions. It is shown that the present formulation is an appropriate and new approach to tackle the problem with good accuracy.
1. Introduction
The objective of this paper is to provide an analytical method to calculate the coupled frequencies of vibration of microbeams partially immersed in a viscous fluid. The microbeams are clamped on one edge while the other edge is free.
The motivation of this work is to provide a theoretical model that can be used in the design and interpretation of density and viscosity sensors.
Due to their size and potential for highly sensitive and low cost compact device applications, microstructures are becoming increasingly attractive for sensing applications and have been studied extensively in recent years. Microstructures are commonly used in atomic force microscopy (AFM) to probe surface properties and to measure interfacial forces [1–7], in biological and chemical sensors [8–10]. A precise modeling of the solidfluid interaction and the determination of the frequency response enable the measurement of the density and the rheological behavior of fluids [11–16]. Reference [16] uses finite element analysis (FEA) method in order to predict the dynamic response of the cantilever beam. This method can be easily applied to the measurement of the fluid viscosity.
For microstructures, fluid viscosity can greatly affect their frequency response. Reference [7] presented a rigorous theoretical model for the frequency response of cantilever beams that are undergoing flexural vibrations and immersed in viscous fluids, which is of particular relevance to applications of the AFM. The knowledge and understanding of the frequency analysis of microbeams are of fundamental practical importance in application to the AFM.
The frequency analysis of a microbeam can be dramatically affected by the properties of the fluid in which it is immersed. Whereas calculation of the natural frequencies in vacuum can be performed routinely, analysis of the effects of immersion in fluid poses a formidable challenge. The modal response of an immersed microbeam can be considerably affected by the properties of fluid. The added mass effect due to the fluid structure interaction can, however, cause considerable variations in natural frequencies. The knowledge and understanding of this viscous fluidstructure coupling are lacking at present.
In this contribution, we investigate the vibrational behavior of microbeams partially immersed in a viscous fluid, which describes the interrelation between the fluid’s density and viscosity. For a viscous fluid problem, the analytical formulation is based upon a convenient decomposition of the velocity field into two contributions, one being related to the scalar potential and the other being the vector potential. The solutions of the differential equations of motion turn out to be complex and can be conveniently treated with the aid of the symbolic software Mathematica. Furthermore, this work investigates the influence of the fluid’s viscosity on the vibrational behavior of the microbeams.
2. Modal Analysis of Beams and Frequency Equation
Modal analysis of elastic immersed structures is needed in every modern construction and should have wide engineering application. In this study, modal analysis is important to predict the dynamic behavior of the submerged beams. It is well known that the natural frequencies of the submerged elastic structures are different from those in vacuum. The effect of fluid forces on the immersed beam decreases the natural frequencies from those that would be measured in the vacuum. This decrease in the natural frequencies is caused by the increase of the kinetic energy of the fluidbeams system without a corresponding increase in strain energy. The EulerBernoulli beam is partially immersed inside rectangular fluid domain (Figure 1). Consider a beam of length 3.06·10^{−2} [m], width 4.6·10^{−3} [m], and thickness 1.27·10^{−4} [m] as shown in Figure 1, which corresponds to a model developed in [16]. The interaction between the fluid and the EulerBernoulli beams is taken into account to calculate the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the coupled system. The dynamics of each beam portion are treated separately. It is assumed that the beam has aligned neutral axis.
2.1. Mathematical Formulation
In this section we present the general theory for the dynamic deflection of beams partially submerged in a viscous fluid. A schematic depiction of beams partially submerged in viscous fluid is displayed in Figure 1. We begin by discussing some general assumptions and approximations taken into account in the present theoretical model. It is assumed that the cross section of the beams is uniform over its entire length and the length of the beams greatly exceeds its width. Also the beams are an isotropic linearly elastic solid and internal frictional effects are negligible. The amplitude of the vibrations of the beams is small. In addition, we shall neglect all torsional effects in the beams and only consider the flexural modes of vibration and we shall consider modes whose motion is strict in the direction. For beams vibrating at small amplitudes (small compared to the beams dimensions), the governing dynamical equations ignoring shear deformation and rotary inertia effects for the transverse deflection ( for submerged portion and for portion in vacuum) of uniform elastic beams can be written in the formwhere and are the lateral deflections at distance (spatial coordinate) along the length of the beams and is time; , , and are the flexural rigidity, the mass per unit volume, and the crosssectional area of the beam, respectively. is the external force per unit length acting on the beam in the direction of the flexural displacement, which is caused by the viscous fluid in the beams. The dynamics of each beam portion are treated separately.
For a beam moving in a viscous fluid, the applied load can be obtained by integrating the normal component of the total force exerted by the fluid over the beam section. To proceed with the analysis, the general form of is required. We therefore examine the equations of motion for the fluid. For this, the viscous fluid mode shapes are first computed for the square domain fluid assuming the boundary conditions given in Figure 1. From conservations of mass and momentum, the motion of the fluid is governed by (see [17])in which is the fluid velocity vector, is the density of the fluid, and is the total fluid stress tensor (pressure and viscous forces). Since the amplitude of vibration of each beam is small compared to its crosssectional dimensions, it then follows that all nonlinear convective inertial effects in the fluid can be neglected, and the hydrodynamic loading on the beam will be a linear function of its displacement. This implies that the fluid dynamics can be modeled as an unsteady linear Stokes flow. Assuming that the fluid is Newtonian, its constitutive equation is given bywhere is a unit tensor, is the dynamic viscosity, and is the fluid pressure. The boundary conditions which define the fluid domain areThe equations of motion (3) and (4) are highly complex and coupled. However, a simpler set of equations can be obtained by introducing scalar potentials and , known as the Helmholtz decomposition [18] in a way which permits easily transferring the vector problem formulation ((3) and (4)) to scalar problem formulation. In flow fields, the velocity is thereby decomposed into a potential flow and a viscous flow. In other words, the velocity can be expressed as a sum of the gradient of a scalar potential and the curl of a vector potential as follows [18]:where is a vector stream function. Using the problem symmetry, the vector potential reduces to a scalar equation; that is, , using the condition , and substituting the above resolutions into (3) and (4), after some manipulations, the equation for the conservation of mass (3) becomes the Laplace equationand the equation for the conservation of momentum (4) becomeswhere is the kinematic fluid viscosity and is the Laplacian operator. Thus, the Stokes equation is reduced to formulation (10) and (11). Moreover, adopting the Cartesian coordinate system and using expression (9), the velocity components, , may be expressed as simple functions of compressional and shear wave potentials in the formand the pertinent stressvelocity relations are
2.1.1. Field Expansions
Consider time harmonic motion throughout with angular frequency and with the dependence suppressed for simplicity. Applying the classical technique of separation of variables in the Cartesian coordinates, the solution of (10) and (11) after some manipulations, and taking into account boundary condition (6) can be shown to bewith the complexvalued coefficients where and is an integer. , , , and are unknown coefficients which will be determined later by imposing the appropriate boundary conditions. Hence, the fluid particle velocity field can be determined from (12) in the formConsequently, direct substitution of the expansions (14)–(19) into the stressvelocity relations (13), after some manipulations, leads toIn order to determine the unknown constants, the appropriate boundary conditions (7) and (8) must be explicitly used. Substituting the total fluid stress tensor components (20)–(22) into boundary conditions equations (8) and velocity components (18)(19) into boundary conditions equations (7), and after some considerable algebraic manipulation, the scalar potentials and becomewhere Using the expressions of and from (23) and (24), in (12), we have the following expressions for the velocity components:Components of the stress tensor can be obtained by substituting the expressions of velocity components ; , from (26) and (27), and the expression of scalar potential from (24) in (13) which comes out as Now we can integrate the normal component of the total force exerted by the fluid over the beam section in order to obtain the external force per unit length acting on the beam in the direction of the flexural displacement . Hence, the deflection of the immersed part of the beam (which is equal to ) can be determined from (1) and (28) in the formwhere primes denote differentiation with respect to the position variable .
2.2. Method of Solution and Frequency Equation
The general solutions of the ordinary differential equations (31) and (2) for the beams system, as shown in Figure 1, can be written in different segments in terms of trigonometric functions and represent propagating waves and hyperbolic functions represent evanescent waves aswhere is the flexural wavenumber and is given byEquation (32) shows that the parameters are resonance frequency parameters and can be plotted for different values of .
The nine constants , , , , , , , , and can be found by imposing the following boundary conditions. Equations (32) and (33) are the general solution for the vibration modes of beams partially immersed in fluid. In the case of a coupled system, the effect of fluid viscosity on the flexible beams must be considered. On the fluidbeams interface, the normal velocity must be continuous. Therefore, the fluid velocity and the deflection of a beam satisfy the relation Substituting (26) and (32) into (36), and after some manipulations, leads to the following equation:Both sides of (37) are integrated over to yield the following equation:where and the coefficients , , , and are written down explicitly in Appendix E. Now the expression of the lateral movement of the submerged beams in contact with the fluid can be formulated using (32) and taking into account (38) aswhere Now, to derive the frequency equation of beams partially immersed in fluid, one assumes that, on the interface between each portion of the beam at the position , the deflection, the rotation angle, the internal shear force, and bending moment of the beam must be continuous. This is satisfied whenTo complete the formulation of the boundaryvalue problem, the four boundary conditions for the beam ends ( and ) considered in this work are specified as follows:Combining the boundary conditions ((41) and (42)) with (33) and (39) yields the following linear homogeneous system of eight equations:where is a matrix whose elements are designated as . This system can have nontrivial solutions only if the determinant of the matrix is zero, leading to the frequency equation. The matrix is written down explicitly in Appendix F.
3. Analytical and Numerical Results and Validation
The model that was developed in Section 2 can be validated by comparing the analytical results to model results calculated using Comsol Multiphysics FEM Simulation Software. This comparison used beams with Young’s modulus being = 200·10^{9} [Pa], Poisson’s ratio being , and density being . The fluid used in the rectangular container for which density of [kg·m^{−3}] and dynamic’s viscosity of [Pa·s] is assumed.
For coupled vibration analysis of beams partially immersed in a viscous fluid, the accuracy of the present method has been compared with the results obtained with Comsol Multiphysics FEM Simulation Software. The FEM used model had number of degrees of freedom and was analyzed using the algorithm based on the UMFPACK method [19].
In this paper the comparison of the values of the angular frequency parameter is given in Table 1. As one can see from the comparison, very good agreement with those of FEM is obtained.

With the derived eigenfrequency equations, natural frequencies are calculated in the software Mathematica. To validate the analytical results, the natural frequencies and mode shapes are also computed using Comsol Multiphysics FEM Simulation Software. The natural frequencies are computed directly from determinant of (43).
Table 1 shows the comparison of the first 24 natural frequencies and the corresponding mode shapes of viscous fluid by FEM and the present method (43). The good agreement is observed between the results of the present method and those of FEM and the relative difference is ⩽2%. This shows that the algorithm implemented in Comsol Multiphysics [20] software for numerical computation is highly reliable and accurate. Mesh refinement can significantly decrease the relative difference.
The two possible first coupled mode shapes are represented in Figure 2. A very good agreement with Figure 3 of [16] confirms the adequate implementation of the method in the FEM software.
Figures 3 and 4 show the influence of fluid’s viscosity on the odd and even natural frequencies. It is seen that the effect of viscosity is very interesting and decreases the frequency of beams. These figures show also for small fluid’s viscosity that the model is not suitable to describe properly the vibrational behavior of beams immersed in a viscous fluid. In this case, the most appropriate model is the model developed in [21]. In other words, the viscosity terms can be neglected and the resulting model is called inertial coupling [22].
Figures 5(a)–5(f)–8(a)–8(f) obtained by Comsol show the first 24 coupled modal shapes with the corresponding eigenvalues . In these figures, solid lines denote streamlines (i.e., Stokes eddies) caused by system boundaries and fluid structure interaction. In addition, the formation of Stokes eddies is not affected by the presence of an obstacle (beam) in the fluid domain. As expected these Stokes eddies increase when the angular frequency is raised like in the case without obstacle. Finally, these Stokes eddies are symmetric with respect to the obstacle.
(a) Mode 1
(b) Mode 2
(c) Mode 3
(d) Mode 4
(e) Mode 5
(f) Mode 6
(a) Mode 7
(b) Mode 8
(c) Mode 9
(d) Mode 10
(e) Mode 11
(f) Mode 12
(a) Mode 13
(b) Mode 14
(c) Mode 15
(d) Mode 16
(e) Mode 17
(f) Mode 18
(a) Mode 19
(b) Mode 20
(c) Mode 21
(d) Mode 22
(e) Mode 23
(f) Mode 24
4. Conclusion
This paper has presented an analytical method to understand the modal behavior of beams partially immersed in a viscous fluid. The validity of the present solution is solidly confirmed numerically. The main application of the proposed method is in characterization of rheological properties of viscous materials [16]. In addition the study can be also extended further for the optimization tool for complex engineering design problems.
Appendices
A. Analytical Expression for the Scalar Potentials
(i) Solution of (11). A time harmonic dependence is assumed, with being the imaginary unit, being the circular frequency, and being the time. We introduce a new auxiliary variable defined as . The first of the two subequations (Equation (11)) consists of determining the scalar potential satisfying the homogeneous diffusion equation By separation of variables, the scalar potential can be written as where and are given by the following ordinary differential equation: The linear independent solutions of these equation yield a general pressure field of the form where , , , and are unknown coefficients which will be determined later by imposing the appropriate boundary conditions.
(ii) Solution of (10). In a similar manner, the solution of (10) can be defined. The solution consists of determining the scalar potential satisfying the Laplace equation By separation of variables, after some elementary manipulations, the linear solution of these equations yields a general scalar potential of the form
(iii) Boundary Conditions. The boundary condition equation (6) can be expressed by Substituting and into boundary condition above gives the analytical solution for potential function (14) and (15). Now using the second equation of (11), the pressure can be presented by (16).
B. NoSlip Condition and StressFree Boundary Condition
In this paper the interface (7) is assumed to be rigid, leading to Substituting (18) and (19) into above rigid boundary equations gives The interface (8) is assumed to be free boundary stress, leading to Substituting (21) and (22) into above free boundary stress equations gives the first conditions, for example, Note that, from the above equation, we can obtain By replacing the constants into (14) and (15), the potential functions and can be expressed by
C. Solution of the Submerged Part of the Beam
We postulate the following solution of (1): describing the lateral deflexion of the submerged beam Substitution into (1) and taking into account (28) yield The software Mathematica was used in order to obtain (32) solution of the above equation. Similarly, we can also find (33) solution of (2) describing the lateral deflexion of the beam in vacuum.
D. Frequency Equation
For nontrivial solution, the determinant of the matrices must be equal to zero This equation indicates a relationship between the kinematic fluid viscosity , fluid density , angular frequency , and the elastic constants. For given material and geometric properties, (DM) constitutes an implicit transcendental function of and . The roots may be computed for a fixed .
E. Auxiliary Coefficients
The coefficients , , , , and in (38) are defined as follows: where
F. The Elements of the Matrix
The matrix in (13) is defined as follows: wherewhere
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 G. Y. Chen, R. J. Warmack, T. Thundat, D. P. Allison, and A. Huang, “Resonance response of scanning force microscopy cantilevers,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 2532–2537, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. K. Hansma, J. P. Cleveland, M. Radmacher et al., “Tapping mode atomic force microscopy in liquids,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 64, no. 13, pp. 1738–1740, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Mertesdorf, M. Schönhoff, F. Lohr, and S. Kirstein, “Scanning nearfield optical microscope designed for operation in liquids,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 755–759, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Despont, H. Takahashi, S. Ichihara et al., “Dualcantilever afm probe for combining fast and coarse imaging with highresolution imaging,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 13th Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS '00), Cat. No.00CH36308, pp. 126–131, Miyazaki, Japan, January 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Napoli, W. Zhang, K. Turner, and B. Bamieh, “Characterization of electrostatically coupled microcantilevers,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 295–304, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. P. Green and J. E. Sader, “Torsional frequency response of cantilever beams immersed in viscous fluids with applications to the atomic force microscope,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 92, article 6262, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. E. Sader, “Frequency response of cantilever beams immersed in viscous fluids with applications to the atomic force microscope,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 64–76, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Muralidharan, A. Wig, L. A. Pinnaduwage, D. Hedden, T. Thundat, and R. T. Lareau, “Adsorptiondesorption characteristics of explosive vapors investigated with microcantilevers,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 97, no. 1–4, pp. 433–439, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. M. Goeders, J. S. Colton, and L. A. Bottomley, “Microcantilevers: sensing chemical interactions via mechanical motion,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 522–542, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Rogers, L. Manning, M. Jones et al., “Mercury vapor detection with a selfsensing, resonating piezoelectric cantilever,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 4899–4901, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. O. Kim, Y. Wang, and H. H. Bau, “The effect of an adjacent viscous fluid on the transmission of torsional stress waves in a submerged waveguide,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1414–1422, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Inaba, K. Akaishi, T. Mori, and K. Hane, “Analysis of the resonance characteristics of a cantilever vibrated photothermally in a liquid,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 2654–2658, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Bergaud and L. Nicu, “Viscosity measurements based on experimental investigations of composite cantilever beam eigenfrequencies in viscous media,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 2487–2491, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Y. Shih, X. Li, H. Gu, W.H. Shih, and I. A. Aksay, “Simultaneous liquid viscosity and density determination with piezoelectric unimorph cantilevers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 1497–1505, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. O. Kim and H. Y. Chun, “Interaction between the torsional vibration of a circular rod and an adjacent viscous fluid,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Hossain, L. Humphrey, and A. Mian, “Prediction of the dynamic response of a minicantilever beam partially submerged in viscous media using finite element method,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1339–1345, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon Press, 1959. View at: MathSciNet
 M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGrawHill, New York, NY, USA, 1946.
 T. A. Davis, “Algorithm 832: UMFPACK, an unsymmetricpattern multifrontal method,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 165–199, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 COMSOL Multiphysics, User's Guide and Reference Guide, Version 3.5a, 2008.
 A. El Baroudi and F. Razafimahery, “Transverse vibration analysis of EulerBernoulli beam carrying point masse submerged in fluid media,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 369–380, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Axisa and J. Antunes, Fluid Structure Interaction, vol. 3 of Modeling of Mechanical Systems, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Wafik Abassi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.